A baker makes peanut butter cookies and chocolate chip cookies. She needs 2 cups of flour and 34 cup of butter to make one batch of peanut butter cookies. She needs 3 cups of flour and 1 cup of butter to make one batch of chocolate chip cookies. Today, the baker used 52 cups of flour and 18 cups of butter to make cookies. How many batches of each type of cookie did she make

To determine the convergence or divergence of the series Σ(n^2)/(n+1) as n goes from 1 to 10, let's consider the ratio test.

The ratio test states that if the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is less than 1, then the series converges. If the limit is greater than 1 or does not exist, the series diverges. Let's apply the ratio test to the given series: |((n+1)^2)/((n+1)+1)| / |(n^2)/(n+1)| = ((n+1)^2)(n+1) / (n^2)(n+2). Taking the limit as n approaches infinity: lim (n -> ∞) (((n+1)^2)(n+1)) / ((n^2)(n+2)) = 1.  Since the limit is equal to 1, the ratio test makes no claims about the convergence or divergence of the series.

Therefore, we cannot conclude whether the series is convergent or divergent based on the ratio test alone.

To learn more about ratio test click here: brainly.com/question/31700436

#SPJ11

The two events are independent.

Given,

A person is chosen in random .

Now,

Independent events are those events that are not affected by each other.

If events X and Y are independent then the occurrence of one of these two events does not depend on the other in any way.

For two independent events X and Y the joint probability is:

P(X∩Y) = P(X) × P(Y)

Define X and Y as follows:

X = a person has eyes

Y = a person is associated/independent.

The event of a person being  associated/independent does not depend on the event of the person having eyes.

The two events are not at all related.

Thus, the two events are independent.

Know more about independent events,

https://brainly.com/question/32716243

#SPJ4

To determine the height the ball will reach on the third bounce, we need to consider the pattern of the ball's bounces.

The ball is initially dropped from a height of 128 cm. On the first bounce, it reaches a height equal to the height of the previous bounce, which is 128 cm. On the second bounce, the ball again reaches a height equal to the height of the previous bounce, which is 128 cm. Therefore, we can observe that the height of each bounce remains constant at 128 cm. Since the question asks for the height the ball will reach on the third bounce, we can conclude that the third bounce will also reach a height of 128 cm.

Hence, the height reached on the third bounce will be 128 cm, or three-quarters of the original height.

To learn more about height click here:brainly.com/question/29131380

#SPJ11

a. The design described Related sample (Repeated measures)

b. The design described Related sample (Matched subjects)

Repeated measures

Here, the researcher collects data from the same participants at two different time points, one month apart.

The participants are exposed to two conditions: eating a meal with no time restriction and eating a meal with a time restriction.

Half of the participants experience the hurried meal first, while the other half experience it second.

By comparing the amount eaten at each sitting, the researcher is examining how the time restriction affects people's eating behavior.

This design involves a related sample because the same participants are measured under different conditions.

Matched subjects,

Here, the researcher compares the sleep quality of two different groups, lonely people and nonlonely people.

The researcher collects data from a random sample of participants from each group.

Although it is not explicitly mentioned how the subjects are matched,

The design involves comparing two distinct groups based on a specific characteristic loneliness.

Therefore, this design can be considered a related sample design with matched subjects.

The matching process may involve ensuring that participants from both groups have similar demographics or characteristics.

To reduce potential confounding factors.

Learn more about design here

brainly.com/question/23529636

#SPJ4

She bought b. 6 black ranchu goldfish, 9 calico gold fish.

Marsha bought 15 fish for a total cost of $29.25, where the black ranchu goldfish cost $2.10 each and calico goldfish cost $1.85 each.

Let b be the number of black ranchu goldfish and c be the number of calico goldfish. We can write the following two equations:

b + c = 15 ..........(i)

2.1b + 1.85c = 29.25 ..........(ii)

Multiplying equation (i) by 1.85 and subtracting from (ii) yields:

2.1b + 1.85c - (1.85b + 1.85c) = 29.25 - (1.85 x 15)

0.25b = 1.5

b = 6

Putting this value of b in equation (i) gives:

c = 15 - b = 9

Thus, Marsha bought 6 black ranchu goldfish and 9 calico goldfish.

To learn more about equations, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

(1) (4.17 x 10⁻³) (4 x 10⁻²), the simplified expression is 1.67 x 10⁻⁴

(2) [tex]\frac{2 \times 10^{-6} }{8.38 \times 10^{-2}}[/tex] , the simplified expression is 2.39 x 10⁻⁵.

(3) [tex]\frac{7.72 \times 10^{2} }{4.39 \times 10^{3}}[/tex], the simplified expression is 0.176.

(4) [tex]\frac{4 \times 10^{3} }{2 \times 10^{4}}[/tex],  the simplified expression is 0.2.

(5) [tex]\frac{8.96 \times 10^{-5} }{4.6 \times 10^{-4}}[/tex], the simplified expression is 0.195.

(7) (7.4 x 10⁻³)⁻², the simplified expression is 1.826 x 10⁴.

(8) (5 x 10²) (3.5 x 10³), the simplified expression is 1.75 x 10⁶.

(9) (3.2 x 10²)³, the simplified expression is 3.28 x 10⁷.

(10) (7 x 10⁻⁴) (6.29 x 10⁻⁴), the simplified expression is 4.403 x 10⁻⁷.

(11) (4.95 x 10² ) ( 7.29 x 10⁴), the simplified expression is 3.609 x 10⁷.

The simplification of the expressions is calculated by applying the following method.

(1) (4.17 x 10⁻³) (4 x 10⁻²)

The expression is simplified as follows;

= (4.17 x 4 ) x 10⁻³ ⁻ ²

= 16.7 x 10⁻⁵

= 1.67 x 10⁻⁴

(2) [tex]\frac{2 \times 10^{-6} }{8.38 \times 10^{-2}}[/tex]

The expression is simplified as follows;

= (2/8.38) x 10⁻⁶ ⁺ ²

= 0.239 x 10⁻⁴

= 2.39 x 10⁻⁵

(3) [tex]\frac{7.72 \times 10^{2} }{4.39 \times 10^{3}}[/tex]

The expression is simplified as follows;

= 0.176

(4) [tex]\frac{4 \times 10^{3} }{2 \times 10^{4}}[/tex]

The expression is simplified as follows;

= (4/2) x 10⁻¹

= 2 x 10⁻¹

= 0.2

(5) [tex]\frac{8.96 \times 10^{-5} }{4.6 \times 10^{-4}}[/tex]

The expression is simplified as follows;

= 0.195

(7) (7.4 x 10⁻³)⁻²

The expression is simplified as follows;

= (1000/7.4)²

= 1.826 x 10⁴

(8) (5 x 10²) (3.5 x 10³)

The expression is simplified as follows;

= (5 x 3.5) x 10²⁺³

= 17.5 x 10⁵

= 1.75 x 10⁶

(9) (3.2 x 10²)³

The expression is simplified as follows;

= 3.28 x 10⁷

(10) (7 x 10⁻⁴) (6.29 x 10⁻⁴)

The expression is simplified as follows;

= (7 x 6.29) x 10⁻⁴⁻⁴

= 44.03 x 10⁻⁸

= 4.403 x 10⁻⁷

(11) (4.95 x 10² ) ( 7.29 x 10⁴)

The expression is simplified as follows;

= ( 4.95 x 7.29) x 10²⁺⁴

= 36.09 x 10⁶

= 3.609 x 10⁷

Learn more about simplification of expressions here: https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ1

The probability that a randomly selected student in my class does not read either of them is 0.20.

We are given that;

- A: the event that a student reads WSJ

- B: the event that a student reads NYT

- P(A) = 0.60, the probability that a student reads WSJ

- P(B) = 0.50, the probability that a student reads NYT

- P(A \cap B) = 0.30, the probability that a student reads both WSJ and NYT

Now,

We can plug these values into the formula and calculate the probability that a student reads at least one of them:

[tex]$$P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B) = 0.60 + 0.50 - 0.30 = 0.80$$[/tex]

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected student in my class reads at least one of them is 0.80.

To find the probability that a randomly selected student in my class does not read either of them, we can use the fact that the sum of all probabilities in a sample space is 1. So, we can subtract the probability of reading at least one of them from:

[tex]$$P(\text{neither}) = 1 - P(A \cup B) = 1 - 0.80 = 0.20$$[/tex]

Therefore, by probability the answer will be 0.20.

Learn more about probability here;

https://brainly.com/question/9326835

#SPJ4

If triangle ADE is shifted to place vertex D on vertex B, the following observations can be made:

The resulting triangle will be congruent to triangle ABC.

To demonstrate the congruence, we need to prove that corresponding sides and angles of the triangles are equal. Let's analyze the sides and angles of both triangles.

Sides:

1. Side AB of triangle ABC coincides with side DB of triangle ADE.

2. Side AC of triangle ABC coincides with side DE of triangle ADE.

3. Side BC of triangle ABC coincides with side EA of triangle ADE.

Angles:

1. Angle A of triangle ABC coincides with angle D of triangle ADE.

2. Angle B of triangle ABC coincides with angle E of triangle ADE.

3. Angle C of triangle ABC coincides with angle A of triangle ADE.

Since all corresponding sides and angles are equal, we can conclude that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle ADE.

When triangle ADE is shifted to place vertex D on vertex B, we observe that the resulting triangle is congruent to triangle ABC. Congruent triangles have the same shape and size, and their corresponding sides and angles are equal.

To know more about vertex, visit

https://brainly.com/question/29638000

#SPJ11

At least 88.89% of all students' garbage will lie within the weight limits of 385 pounds and 895 pounds, based on Chebyshev's theorem.

Chebyshev's theorem states that for any distribution (regardless of its shape), at least [tex](1 - 1/k^2)[/tex] of the data falls within k standard deviations of the mean, where k is any positive constant greater than 1.

In this case, we want to find the weight limits within which at least 88.89% of all students' garbage lies.

Therefore, we need to find the value of k that corresponds to 88.89% of the data falling within that range.

Since Chebyshev's theorem does not provide an exact percentage, but rather a lower bound, we can set up an inequality to solve for the range:

1 - 1/[tex]k^2[/tex] ≥ 0.8889

Solving this inequality, we get:

1/[tex]k^2[/tex] ≤ 0.1111

Taking the reciprocal of both sides, we have:

[tex]k^2[/tex] ≥ 1/0.1111

[tex]k^2[/tex] ≥ 9

Taking the square root of both sides, we find:

k ≥ √9

k ≥ 3

Therefore, according to Chebyshev's theorem, at least 88.89% of all students' garbage will lie within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

To find the weight limits, we can multiply the standard deviation by the value of k:

Lower limit = Mean - (k [tex]\times[/tex] Standard deviation)

Upper limit = Mean + (k [tex]\times[/tex] Standard deviation)

Substituting the values given:

Lower limit = 640 - (3 [tex]\times[/tex] 85) = 385 pounds

Upper limit = 640 + (3 [tex]\times[/tex] 85) = 895 pounds

For similar question on standard deviations.

https://brainly.com/question/12402189  

#SPJ11

John is 10 years old and Marcus is 15 years old.

Let the present age of John be j years.

Present age of Marcus = (j + 5) years

Five years ago: Age of John = (j - 5) years

Age of Marcus = ((j + 5) - 5) years = j years

According to the given statement, five years ago he was 2 times older than John. i.e.

j = 2(j - 5)

j = 10

So, present age of John = j = 10 years

Present age of Marcus = (j + 5) = 15 years

Thus, John is 10 years old and Marcus is 15 years old.

Learn more about "Age relationship" refer to the link : https://brainly.com/question/28480994

#SPJ11

If the number of people who are overweight and have high cholesterol is 324, the number of people who are overweight and have low cholesterol is 450, the number of people who are normal weight and have high cholesterol is 368, and the number of people who are normal weight and have low cholesterol is 890, then the conditional probability of sampling an individual that is overweight given that the individual has high cholesterol is 46.8%

To find the conditional probability of sampling an individual that is overweight given that the individual has high cholesterol, follow these steps:

Hence, the conditional probability of sampling an individual that is overweight given that the individual has high cholesterol is 46.8%.

Learn more about conditional probability:

brainly.com/question/7965468

#SPJ11

The supplier's claim that no more than 1% of the cards are defective is valid.

Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a statistical technique that helps in making a decision about the population parameter. Here, we need to conduct a hypothesis testing to the claim about a population proportion. The hypothesis testing is given below:

Null Hypothesis H0: p ≤ 0.01 (Supplier's claim)

Alternate Hypothesis Ha: p > 0.01 (Supplier's claim is not correct)

Where, p is the population proportion. Significance level (b) = 0.01, this means b = 0.01,

The test statistics formula is given by:

z = (p1 - p) / √(p(1 - p) / n)

Here, p1 is the sample proportion, p is the hypothesized population proportion, n is the sample size.

Substituting the given values, we get

z = (0.02 - 0.01) / √(0.01(0.99) / 600 )= 2.04 (approx.)

The critical value for the significance level of 0.01 with right-tailed z-test is given by:

zb= 2.33

Since the calculated value of z (2.04) is less than the critical value of zb (2.33), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Hence, there is not enough evidence to claim that the supplier's claim is not correct.

Therefore, the supplier's claim that no more than 1% of the cards are defective is valid.

Hence, we can conclude that the null hypothesis is accepted.

To know more about the Hypothesis Testing, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ11

a) With 95% confidence the proportion of all smart phones that break before the warranty expires is between 0.0525 and 0.0635.

b) If many groups of 1666 randomly selected smart phones are selected, then a different confidence interval would be produced for each group. About 95 percent of these confidence intervals will contain the true population proportion of all smart phones that break before the warranty expires and about 5 percent will not contain the true population proportion.

A smart phone manufacturer is interested in constructing a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of smart phones that break before the warranty expires. 95 of the 1666 randomly selected smart phones broke before the warranty expired.To calculate the confidence interval for the proportion of smart phones that break before the warranty expires, we must first calculate the point estimate of the population proportion of smart phones that break before the warranty expires:95/1666 = 0.057 (rounded to three decimal places)Then, we have to find the margin of error that is, the maximum distance between the point estimate and the confidence interval limits.

We can do that with the help of the following formula:margin of error = critical value × standard errorThe critical value can be found in the z-table or t-table, depending on the sample size. Since we do not know the population standard deviation, we can use the t-distribution. The degrees of freedom are n − 1 = 1666 − 1 = 1665.Using the t-table with degrees of freedom 1665 and level of significance α = 0.05, the critical value is:t* = 1.96 (rounded to two decimal places)The standard error can be calculated using the following formula:standard error = √[(p-hat (1-p-hat))/n] = √[(0.057(1-0.057))/1666] ≈ 0.0083 (rounded to four decimal places)Finally, we can calculate the confidence interval using the following formula:confidence interval = point estimate ± margin of error confidence interval = 0.057 ± 1.96(0.0083) = (0.0525, 0.0635)The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all smart phones that break before the warranty expires is between 0.0525 and 0.0635.

If many groups of 1666 randomly selected smart phones are selected, then a different confidence interval would be produced for each group. About 95 percent of these confidence intervals will contain the true population proportion of all smart phones that break before the warranty expires and about 5 percent will not contain the true population proportion.

Learn more about the word warranty here,

https://brainly.com/question/27919230

#SPJ11

The probability that Betty gets an A in math based on a coin flip decision is 0.8.

The given information states that Betty estimates her probability of receiving an A grade in a math course to be 0.8. However, her decision-making process is based on flipping a fair coin. In this case, the coin flip does not affect the probability of Betty's performance in the math course. Therefore, the probability of her getting an A in math remains the same as her initial estimation, which is 0.8.

In other words, the outcome of the coin flip is independent of Betty's ability or performance in the math course. It does not affect the probability she assigned to receiving an A grade. The coin flip simply serves as a random decision-making mechanism, and regardless of the coin flip's outcome, the probability of her getting an A in math remains 0.8.

Learn more about Probability

brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

The time taken to paint the room by both April and Alma is 4.44 hours.

Given that :

April can paint a room in 10 hours.

Alma can paint the same room in 8 hours.

Let t be the time taken by both April and Alma to paint the room.

Rate at which Alma paint the room is 1/8.

Rate at which April paint the room = 1/10.

So we can write this as :

Rate at which both paint the room = 1/t.

So,

1/8 + 1/10 = 1/t

(10 + 8) / 80 = 1/t

Cross multiply.

18t = 80

t = 4.44 hours.

Hence they both will complete the work in 4.44 hours.

Learn more about Rate here :

https://brainly.com/question/29334875

#SPJ4

Answer: x^2 - 3x - 18 = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the solutions are x = -3 and x = 6, another way this could be written is (x+3)(x-6) = 0 (*This is because either x+3 or x-6 must equal 0 to make this true. So when you set x+3 = 0 or x-6= 0, you get the solutions x = -3 and 6)

After this, you can FOIL* the equation above, (This is a method where the first, outside, inside and last terms of the binomials are multiplied together to get the solution.)

So we get: x*x + x*-6+ x*3 + 3*-6 = 0

We can then simplify to get x^2 - 3x - 18 = 0.

*I hope I explained this well enough, but for more information try googling Zero property with binomials for the first part and FOIL method for the second part. Hope this helps :)

The function g(x) is defined as 2 times f(x), and we need to find the values of g(2) and g'(2). Given that f(T) = 5, f'(7) = 2, 9'(7) = 3, and g'(7) = 8, we also need to find the values of h(7) and h'(x) where h(x) = 5f(x) + 29x.

To find g(2), we substitute x = 2 into the equation g(x) = 2f(x). Therefore, g(2) = 2f(2). Since we are not given the specific value of f(2), we cannot determine the exact value of g(2) without additional information.

To find g'(2), we need to differentiate g(x) with respect to x. Since g(x) = 2f(x), we have g'(x) = 2f'(x). Therefore, g'(2) = 2f'(2). Again, without knowing the value of f'(2), we cannot calculate the exact value of g'(2).

Moving on to the function h(x) = 5f(x) + 29x, we are asked to find h(7) and h'(x). To find h(7), we substitute x = 7 into the equation. Therefore, h(7) = 5f(7) + 29(7). Given that f(7) = 5, we can calculate h(7) = 5(5) + 29(7) = 25 + 203 = 228.

To find h'(x), we need to differentiate h(x) with respect to x. Using the sum rule and the constant multiple rule of differentiation, we have h'(x) = 5f'(x) + 29. Therefore, h'(7) = 5f'(7) + 29(1). Given that f'(7) = 2, we can calculate h'(7) = 5(2) + 29 = 10 + 29 = 39.

Finally, we cannot determine the exact values of g(2) and g'(2) without additional information about f(x). However, we can calculate h(7) = 228 and h'(7) = 39 using the given values for f(T), f'(7), 9'(7), and g'(7).

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

The rate of the current is 1.5 mph, and the length of the course is 9 miles.

Let's assume the rate at which Ben paddles in still water is represented by r (in mph), and the rate of the current is represented by c (in mph).

When paddling upstream, Ben is paddling against the current, so his effective speed is reduced. The time it takes him to complete the course is 6 hours, and the distance he covers is represented by d (in miles). Using the formula d = (r - c) * t, we have d = (r - c) * 6.

When paddling downstream, Ben is paddling with the current, so his effective speed is increased. The time it takes him to complete the course is 2 hours. Using the same formula, we have d = (r + c) * 2.

We can solve these two equations to find the values of r and c. By dividing the second equation by the first equation, we get (r + c)/(r - c) = 1/3.

Solving this equation, we find r = 4 mph and c = 1.5 mph.

Therefore, the rate of the current is 1.5 mph, and the length of the course is determined by substituting r and c into either of the original equations. The length of the course is 9 miles.

To learn more about “distance” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/26550516

#SPJ11

The hypothesis test statement below is a Type I Error Failing to reject the claim that community college students pay at least $1,250 per year on textbooks when the actual amount that community college students pay for textbooks is actually less than $1,250 per year. Option C is the correct answer.

A Type I Error occurs when the null hypothesis is wrongly rejected, leading to the conclusion that there is a significant effect or difference when, in reality, there is no such effect or difference.

In this case, option c represents a Type I Error because it falsely fails to reject the claim of paying at least $1,250 per year on textbooks when the actual amount is less than $1,250.

Learn more about hypothesis tests at

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

The angle sum property of a triangle indicates that the variable x = 32, and the measures of the angles are;

m∠A = 115°

m∠C = 50°

The angle sum property of a triangle states that the sum obtained from adding the three interior angles of a triangle is 180°.

The expressions for the measures of the angles of the triangles are;

m∠A = (4·x - 13)°

m∠B = 15°

m∠C = (x + 18)°

The angle sum property for a triangle indicates that we get;

(4·x - 13) + 15 + (x + 18) = 180

5·x + 20 = 180

5·x = 180 - 20 = 160

x = 160/5 = 32

Therefore; m∠A = (4·x - 13)°

m∠A = (4 × 32 - 13)° = 115°

m∠B = 15°

m∠C = (x + 18)°

m∠C = (32 + 18)° = 50°

Learn more on the angle sum property here: https://brainly.com/question/31226618

#SPJ1

The type of survey that is utilized to determine the extent of problems in a certain area and then express the findings as rates affected within the population is known as an epidemiological survey.

What is an epidemiological survey?

An epidemiological survey is a type of survey used to understand the prevalence and incidence of particular health problems in a particular population. In addition, epidemiological surveys are utilized to determine the causes, transmission, and treatment of these problems.

Epidemiological studies are classified according to the types of questions that they are designed to answer. They are as follows:

Descriptive studies: These studies describe the incidence, prevalence, and distribution of diseases in populations.

Analytical studies: These studies are concerned with determining the causative factors of diseases in populations.

Experimental studies: These studies determine the efficacy and safety of new treatments for diseases.

Learn more about epidemiological survey here:

https://brainly.com/question/13497485

#SPJ11

The total number of ways the person can get 66 fours, 55 sixes, and 11 threes when rolling a standard six-sided die 1212 times is approximately 3.69941 × 10²⁶⁸.

To determine the number of ways the person can obtain a specific outcome, we need to use the concept of combinations.

The person rolls the die 1212 times. Out of those rolls, we are interested in the number of ways they can get 66 fours, 55 sixes, and 11 threes.

Let's calculate the number of ways for each case:

1. Number of ways to get 66 fours:

Since there are 6 possible outcomes on each roll of the die, the number of ways to get 66 fours out of 1212 rolls is given by the combination formula:

C(n, r) = n! / (r!(n-r)!)

In this case, n is the total number of rolls (1212) and r is the number of fours (66). So, the number of ways to get 66 fours is:

C(1212, 66) = 1212! / (66!(1212-66)!)

2. Number of ways to get 55 sixes:

Using the same approach, the number of ways to get 55 sixes out of 1212 rolls is:

C(1212, 55) = 1212! / (55!(1212-55)!)

3. Number of ways to get 11 threes:

Similarly, the number of ways to get 11 threes out of 1212 rolls is:

C(1212, 11) = 1212! / (11!(1212-11)!)

To find the total number of ways to obtain the specific outcome, we need to multiply the number of ways for each case:

Total number of ways = C(1212, 66) * C(1212, 55) * C(1212, 11)

Total number of ways ≈ (2.62279 × 10¹²¹) * (1.99129 × 10¹¹⁸) * (7.32245 × 10²⁹)

≈ 3.69941 × 10²⁶⁸

Therefore, the total number of ways the person can get 66 fours, 55 sixes, and 11 threes when rolling a standard six-sided die 1212 times is approximately 3.69941 × 10²⁶⁸.

Learn more about combinations click;

https://brainly.com/question/20211959

#SPJ4

The required sample size is 22.

Given, We want to estimate the population mean within 20, with a 90% level of confidence. The population standard deviation is estimated to be 57. We need to find how large a sample is required.

The formula for the sample size is given by,

Sample size formula n = ((z * σ) / E)^2

Where z is the z-value,σ is the population standard deviation, and E is the maximum error between the sample mean and population mean.

From the given information, The level of confidence is 90%. The maximum error between the sample mean and population mean is 20. The population standard deviation is 57. The level of confidence for a 90% confidence interval is 0.90, which means the alpha level (α) is 0.10.

Therefore, the z-value for a 90% confidence interval is 1.645.

Using the given values in the sample size formula,n = ((z * σ) / E)^2n = ((1.645 * 57) / 20)^2n = (93.765 / 20)^2n = 4.688^2n = 22.0072 ≈ 22

Hence, the required sample size is 22. The answer is 22.

To learn more about sample size refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/31734526

#SPJ11

The sum of the series is 1001.

Given,

The first term of the series = 13

The last term of the series = 130

Number of terms in the series = 14

Formula used:

The sum of n terms of an arithmetic series is given by

S = (n/2) * [2a + (n - 1) d]

Where,

S = sum of the series

n = number of terms

a = first term

d = common difference.

Now, to find the sum of the series, we need to find the common difference, d.

To find d, we use the formula for the nth term of an arithmetic series.

Tₙ = a + (n - 1)d

Where

Tₙ = nth term, a = first term, and d = common difference.

We know that the last term of the series is 130i.e,

T₁₄ = 130

Also, the first term of the series is 13i.e, a = 13

Using the above formula,

Tₙ = a + (n - 1)d

T₁₄ = a + (14 - 1)d

130 = 13 + 13d

130 - 13 = 13d

117 = 13d

Dividing by 13 on both sides,

d = 9

So, the common difference is 9.

Now, using the formula for the sum of the series,

S = (n/2) * [2a + (n - 1) d]

S = (14/2) * [2 * 13 + (14 - 1) * 9]

S = 7 * (26 + 117)

S = 7 * 143

S = 1001

Therefore, the sum of the series is 1001.

To learn more about arithmetic series from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ11

Robber number one is using a circular argument to justify why he gets more money than the other two thieves. He claims that he is the leader because he has more money, and he has more money because he is the leader. This is a logical fallacy because it assumes the conclusion of the argument as its premise.

There are a few possible outcomes that could result from this situation. The other two thieves could simply accept robber number one's reasoning and continue with the division of the money. However, they could also challenge robber number one's reasoning and argue that he should not get more money than them. If they do this, the situation could escalate into an argument or even a fight.

Ultimately, the outcome of this situation will depend on the personalities of the three thieves and how they choose to handle the situation. However, it is important to note that Robber number one's argument is logically flawed. He is using a circular argument to justify why he gets more money than the other two thieves.

To learn more about Circular argument, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15766393

#SPJ11

The initial founder population for the given function is equal to 5 million.

To determine the initial flounder population (P(0)) from the  function

Function is equal to,

P(t) = 6t + 5(0.3t² + 1),

Substitute t = 0 into the function P(t) = 6t + 5(0.3t² + 1) we get,

⇒ P(0) = 6(0) + 5(0.3(0)² + 1)

Simply the above expression we get,

⇒ P(0) = 0 + 5(0 + 1)

⇒ P(0) = 5(1)

⇒ P(0) = 5

Therefore, the initial flounder population is 5 million.

learn more about population here

brainly.com/question/32658669

#SPJ4

The probability that the 4th donation selected at random can be safely used in a blood transfusion on someone with Type B blood is 0.098, or 9.8%.

To find the probability that the 4th donation selected at random can be safely used in a blood transfusion on someone with Type B blood, we need to consider the percentages of each blood type and their compatibility with Type B blood.

From the information given, we know that 49% of donations are Type O blood and 20% of donations are Type B blood. A person with Type B blood can safely receive blood transfusions of Type O and Type B blood.

The probability of selecting a Type O blood donation on the 4th selection is 49% (0.49), and the probability of selecting a Type B blood donation on the 4th selection is 20% (0.20).

To find the probability of both events happening (selecting Type O blood and Type B blood consecutively), we multiply the probabilities together:

(0.49) * (0.20) = 0.098

Among the given options, the correct answer is (0.80)3(0.20), which calculates the probability of selecting Type O blood three times followed by selecting Type B blood on the 4th selection.

for more such questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ8

Mrs. Weeks received a Change of $195.00.

The given data is:

Type of Ball football basketball baseball softball Cost per Ball $8.00 $9.00 $7.00 $ 5.00 Total Number of Balls (from Part 1)Mrs. Weeks bought all the baseballs and softballs.

The cost per ball of baseballs and softballs are $7.00 and $5.00 respectively

The total number of balls from part 1 = 30 + 18 + 15 + 20= 83Mrs. Weeks bought baseballs and softballs:15 + 20 = 35 baseballs and softballs Cost of each baseball is $7.00

The cost of each softball is $5.00

The cost of 35 baseballs is $7.00 x 15 = $105.00

The cost of 35 softballs is $5.00 x 20 = $100.00

The total cost of all baseballs and softballs = $105.00 + $100.00 = $205.00Mrs. Weeks paid for them using four $100.00 bills.

The total amount paid by Mrs. Weeks = $100.00 x 4 = $400.00Mrs.

Weeks received change = Amount paid – Total cost of all baseballs and softballs= $400.00 – $205.00= $195.00

Therefore, Mrs. Weeks received a change of $195.00.

For more questions on Change .

https://brainly.com/question/28888240

#SPJ8

The probabilities are =

1) Probability ≈ 0.42 or 42%

2) Probability = 0.82 or 82%

3) To maximize the probability of winning, you should bid an amount just above $9,900, which is the lower limit of the range where your bid can win.

4) To maximize the expected profit, you should bid an amount less than $16,000 but as close as possible to maximize your potential profit.

To calculate the probabilities and determine the optimal bidding strategy, we need to analyze the given scenario using probability and expected value concepts.

i. Probability of your bid being accepted when you bid $12,000:

The competitor's bid x is uniformly distributed between $9,900 and $14,900. Since your bid is $12,000, it will be accepted if the competitor's bid is below $12,000.

The range of possible values for x is $9,900 to $14,900, and your bid will be accepted if x < $12,000.

The length of this range is $14,900 - $9,900 = $5,000.

Since the distribution is uniform, the probability of your bid being accepted is the ratio of the length of the range where your bid wins (x < $12,000) to the total length of the range.

Probability = (Length of the range where your bid wins) / (Total length of the range)

Probability = ($12,000 - $9,900) / ($14,900 - $9,900)

Probability = $2,100 / $5,000

Probability ≈ 0.42 or 42%

ii. Probability of your bid being accepted when you bid $14,000:

Using the same approach as before:

Probability = ($14,000 - $9,900) / ($14,900 - $9,900)

Probability = $4,100 / $5,000

Probability = 0.82 or 82%

iii. Bidding amount to maximize the probability of winning:

To maximize the probability of winning, you should bid an amount just above $9,900, which is the lower limit of the range where your bid can win.

iv. Expected profit for different bidding scenarios:

If someone is willing to pay you $16,000 for the property, we can calculate the expected profit for different bidding amounts to determine the optimal bid.

Let's consider the bidding amounts $12,950 and the previously calculated optimal bidding amount.

For a bid of $12,950:

Probability of winning = ($12,950 - $9,900) / ($14,900 - $9,900)

Probability of winning ≈ 0.65 or 65%

Expected profit = (Probability of winning x Offer price) - (Bid amount)

Expected profit = (0.65 x $16,000) - $12,950

Expected profit ≈ $10,400 - $12,950

Expected profit ≈ -$2,550 (negative profit)

For the optimal bid (just above $9,900):

Probability of winning ≈ 1 (since your bid is slightly higher than the competitor's range)

Expected profit = (Probability of winning x Offer price) - (Bid amount)

Expected profit = (1 x $16,000) - (optimal bid amount)

Expected profit = $16,000 - (optimal bid amount)

To maximize the expected profit, you should bid an amount less than $16,000 but as close as possible to maximize your potential profit.

Learn more about probability click;

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4

The ratio of e : f is 3 : 1.

To find the ratio e:f, given the equation `5e² - 13ef - 6f² = 0`, where e and f ≠ 0. The given equation can be factorised as follows: `5e² - 15ef + 2ef - 6f² = 0`==> 5e(e - 3f) + 2f(e - 3f) = 0==> (e - 3f)(5e + 2f) = 0.

We know that `e` and `f` ≠ 0.Thus, e = 3f (Since `e + 3f = 0` is not possible)The ratio of e:f is e : f = 3f : f = 3 : 1.

.Thus, the ratio of e : f is 3 : 1. Therefore, e = 3x = 3(37.5) = 112.5 and f = x = 37.5.    

Learn more on equation here:

brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11