The probability that a circuit board produced by a particular manufacturer has a defect is 1%. You can assume that errors are independent, so the event that one circuit board has a defect is independent of whether a different circuit board has a defect.
a. What is the probability that out of 100 circuit boards made exactly 2 have defects?
b. What is the probability that out of 100 circuit boards made at least 2 have defects?
c. What is the expected number of circuit boards with defects out of the 100 made?
d. Now suppose that the circuit boards are made in batches of two. Either both circuit boards in a batch have a defect or they are both free of defects. The probability that a batch has a defect is 1%. What is the probability that out of 100 circuit boards (50 batches) at least 2 have defects? What is the expected number of circuit boards with defects out of the 100 made? How do your answers compared to the situation in which each circuit board is made separately?
The total expected number of circuit boards with defects out of the 100 made is 2 times the expected number of defective batches, which is:μ = 2 * 0.5 * 2≈ 2.
a. The probability that out of 100 circuit boards made exactly 2 have defects is calculated using the binomial distribution formula:
P(X = k)
= nCk * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)
where n
= 100, p
= 0.01, and k
= 2. Thus,
P(X = 2)
= 100C2 * (0.01)^2 * (0.99)^98≈ 0.37b.
The probability that out of 100 circuit boards made at least 2 have defects can be calculated using the complement rule
.P(X ≥ 2)
= 1 - P(X < 2)
= 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 1)
where n
= 100, p
= 0.01. Thus,
P(X = 0)
= 100C0 * (0.01)^0 * (0.99)^100≈ 0.366P(X = 1)
= 100C1 * (0.01)^1 * (0.99)^99≈ 0.369
Therefore
,P(X ≥ 2) ≈ 1 - 0.366 - 0.369≈ 0.265c.
The expected number of circuit boards with defects out of the 100 made is given by the formula:μ
= n * p where n
= 100 and p
= 0.01. Therefore,μ
= 100 * 0.01
= 1d.
If the circuit boards are made in batches of two, then there are 50 batches of two circuit boards each. The probability that a batch has a defect is 1%. Therefore, the probability that a batch is defect-free is 99%.a. The probability that out of 100 circuit boards (50 batches) at least 2 have defects is calculated using the binomial distribution formula:P(X ≥ 2)
= 1 - P(X < 2)
= 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 1)
where n
= 50, p
= 0.01. Thus,P(X = 0)
= 50C0 * (0.01)^0 * (0.99)^50≈ 0.605P(X = 1)
= 50C1 * (0.01)^1 * (0.99)^49≈ 0.324
Therefore,
P(X ≥ 2) ≈ 1 - 0.605 - 0.324≈ 0.071b.
The expected number of circuit boards with defects out of the 100 made can be calculated as follows:For each batch of two circuit boards, either both have a defect or both are defect-free. Therefore, the number of defective circuit boards in each batch follows a binomial distribution with n = 2 and p = 0.01. The expected number of defective circuit boards in each batch is given by the formula:μ = n * pwhere n
= 2 and p
= 0.01.
Therefore,
μ
= 2 * 0.01
= 0.02The expected number of defective batches out of 50 batches is given by the formula:
μ = n * pwhere
n = 50 and
p = 0.01.
Therefore,
μ = 50 * 0.01
= 0.5.
The total expected number of circuit boards with defects out of the 100 made is 2 times the expected number of defective batches, which is:
μ = 2 * 0.5 * 2≈ 2.
To know more about circuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12608516
#SPJ11
What is the total variance of the following portfolio consisting of 2 assets invested in the ratio of 1:2. Asset A: E(r) = 0.2,0 = 0.5 Asset B: E(r) = 0.4, 6 = 0.7 Correlation: -0.8 rf = 0.1 A) 0.14 B) 0.12 C) 0.10 D) 0.08
The total variance of the portfolio is 0.11644, which is equal to option b-To 0.12 when rounded to two decimal places.
To calculate the total variance of a portfolio, we need to consider the variances of individual assets as well as the covariance between them. Given the correlation coefficient (ρ) of -0.8, we can calculate the covariance (σAB) using the formula:
σAB = ρ * σA * σB
σA = 0.5 (standard deviation of Asset A)
σB = 0.7 (standard deviation of Asset B)
ρ = -0.8 (correlation coefficient)
σAB = -0.8 * 0.5 * 0.7 = -0.28
The total variance (σp²) of the portfolio is calculated as follows:
σp² = w₁² * σ₁² + w₂² * σ₂² + 2 * w₁ * w₂ * σAB
w₁ = 1/3 (weight of Asset A)
w₂ = 2/3 (weight of Asset B)
σp² = (1/3)² * 0.5² + (2/3)² * 0.7² + 2 * (1/3) * (2/3) * (-0.28)
= 0.01444 + 0.22644 - 0.12444
= 0.11644
learn more about Variance here:
https://brainly.com/question/29615374
#SPJ4
A glass jar contains 33 marbles. There are 25 red marbles and 8 blue marbles. Describe the probability of a red marble.
The probability of selecting a red marble from the glass jar is 25/33, which can be simplified to approximately 0.758 or 75.8%.
To understand the probability, we need to consider the total number of marbles in the jar, which is 33. Out of these 33 marbles, 25 are red and 8 are blue.
When we talk about probability, we are interested in the likelihood of a specific outcome occurring. In this case, the specific outcome is selecting a red marble from the jar.
To calculate the probability, we divide the number of favorable outcomes (number of red marbles) by the total number of possible outcomes (total number of marbles). In this case, we divide 25 (the number of red marbles) by 33 (the total number of marbles).
Therefore, the probability of selecting a red marble is 25/33.
This means that if you were to randomly pick a marble from the jar, the chances of picking a red marble would be 25 out of 33, or approximately 0.758, or 75.8%.
To learn more about Probability, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6649771
#SPJ11
Observa el ejemplo resuelto y calcula de este modo los restantes
. [(-14)- (+3)] - (+8) =
. [(-16) - (-9)] (-7) =
[(+18) - (-6) - (+18) =
[(+21) - (-16) - (-14) =
[(-32) - (-19)] -(-11) =
[(-49) - (-21)] - (+12)=
The values for the remaining calculations are:
[(-14)- (+3)] - (+8) = -25[(-16) - (-9)] (-7) = 0[(+18) - (-6) - (+18) = 6[(+21) - (-16) - (-14) = 51[(-32) - (-19)] -(-11) = -2[(-49) - (-21)] - (+12) = -40How to solve addition and subtractions?To calculate the remaining values step by step:
Simplify the first expression: [(-14) - (+3)] - (+8) =
Subtracting 8: = -14 - 3 - 8
= -25
Simplify the first expression: [(-16) - (-9)] - (-7) =
Adding 7: = -16 + 9 + 7
= 0
Simplify the first expression: [(+18) - (-6)] - (+18) =
Subtracting 18: = 18 + 6 - 18
= 6
Simplify the first expression: [(+21) - (-16)] - (-14) =
Adding 14: = 21 + 16 + 14
= 51
Simplify the first expression: [(-32) - (-19)] - (-11) =
Adding 11: = -32 + 19 + 11
= -2
Simplify the first expression: [(-49) - (-21)] - (+12) =
Subtracting 12: = -49 + 21 - 12
= -40
Therefore, the remaining calculations are:
-250651-2-40Find out more on addition and subtraction here: https://brainly.com/question/4721701
#SPJ4
At noon three students, Abby, Ben, and Cassie, are standing so that Abby is 100 m west of Ben and Cassie is 160 m east of Ben. While Ben stays in his initial position, Abby begins walking south at a constant rate of 20 m min and Cassie begins walking north at a constant rate of 41 m min. In how many minutes will the distance between Cassie and Ben be the twice the distance between Abby and Ben?
The time taken for the distance between Cassie and Ben to be twice the distance between Abby and Ben is 44 seconds (approximately).
The given distances between Abby, Ben, and Cassie are:Abby is 100 m west of BenCassie is 160 m east of BenThe initial distance between Cassie and Ben is 160 + 100 = 260 m
The given rates of Abby and Cassie are:Abby walks at a rate of 20 m/minCassie walks at a rate of 41 m/minLet the time taken for Abby to cover the required distance be t minAfter t minutes, the distance covered by Abby would be 20t mThe distance covered by Cassie in the same time t is 41t mThe distance between Cassie and Ben is (260 - 41t) mThe distance between Abby and Ben is (100 + 20t) mAccording to the question, the distance between Cassie and Ben should be twice the distance between Abby and Ben.So, we get the equation:2 × (100 + 20t) = 260 - 41t.
Solving for t:200 + 40t = 260 - 41t81t = 60t = 60/81 h = (20/27) minTherefore, the time taken for the distance between Cassie and Ben to be twice the distance between Abby and Ben is 44 seconds (approximately).Answer: 44
Learn more on distance here:
brainly.com/question/31713805
##SPJ11
Luka wants to know the theoretical and experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than a 5 on a 6-sided number cube numbered 1 to 6. he rolls the number cube 10 times and records the results in this table. 1 5 2 6 4 6 2 5 6 3 drag and drop the answers in the boxes to correctly complete the sentences comparing theoretical probability and experimental probability. the theoretical probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is response area because this is what response area. the experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is response area because this is what response area.
The experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is: 6 successful outcomes / 10 total outcomes = 0.6 or 60%
The theoretical probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is 2/3 because this is what the cube shows (1, 2, 3, 4).
The experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is 0.6 or 60% because this is what is obtained from rolling the cube 10 times.
Given that the number cube has six sides, numbered 1 to 6 and Luka rolled it 10 times, we can find the theoretical probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 by dividing the possible number of outcomes by the total number of outcomes.
The possible outcomes that are smaller than 5 are 1, 2, 3, and 4, which is a total of four outcomes. The total number of outcomes is six since the cube has six sides. The theoretical probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is:
4 possible outcomes / 6 total outcomes = 2/3
The experimental probability of rolling a number smaller than 5 is obtained by calculating the ratio of the number of times Luka obtained a number smaller than 5 and the total number of times he rolled the cube.
In this case, the number of times Luka obtained a number smaller than 5 is 6 since there are 6 numbers less than 5, and the total number of times he rolled the cube is 10.
To learn more on probability:
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
An experiment is designed to test whether a new drug can be used to reduce auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics. Schizophrenics who experience auditory hallucinations are randomly assigned to receive either a placebo drug, a very low dosage, a moderate dosage, or a high dosage of the drug. The results of the experiment show that the moderate dosage is the most effective. What is the major problem with this experiment
Option A : There is possible order effect.
Given,
Experiment to test whether the new drug reduce auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics .
There may be order effects. Order effects refer to the order of the conditions having an effect on the person on which the experiment is being done .
Performance in the second condition may be better because the participants know what to do or their performance might be worse in the second condition because they are tired .
Hence option A is correct.
Learn more about experiments,
https://brainly.com/question/15088897
#SPJ4
Correct question with option:
Q)
An experiment is designed to test whether a new drug can be used to reduce auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics. Schizophrenics who experience auditory hallucinations are randomly assigned to receive either a placebo drug, a very low dosage, a moderate dosage, or a high dosage of the drug. The results of the experiment show that the moderate dosage is the most effective. What is the major problem with this experiment
Options:
1) There is possible order effect.
2 ) there is no control group that receives no drug at all .
3) The participants doesn't match for occurence of auditory hallucinations
4) The study isn't a true experiment .
A doctor took a random sample of n = 6 patients to see how long they each spent in the waiting room.
She wants to construct a t interval for the mean waiting time with 99% confidence. The times in the
sample were roughly symmetric with a mean of z = 8. 5 minutes and a standard deviation of sx = 2. 8
minutes.
The correct answer is- we can be 99% confident that the true mean waiting time is between 4.16 and 12.84 minutes.
A doctor took a random sample of n = 6 patients to see how long they each spent in the waiting room. She wants to construct a t interval for the mean waiting time with 99% confidence. The times in the sample were roughly symmetric with a mean of z = 8.5 minutes and a standard deviation of sx = 2.8 minutes. We have to find the 99% confidence interval of the waiting time.
The formula for the confidence interval is shown below:[tex]\[\large \bar x-t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} < \mu < \bar x+t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\][/tex]
Where: [tex]\[\large \bar x\][/tex] is the sample mean [tex]\[s\][/tex] is the sample standard deviation [tex]\[n\][/tex] is the sample size[tex]\[\large t_{\alpha/2}\][/tex] is the t-score from the t-distribution with (n - 1) degrees of freedom, where α is the level of significance
The sample mean is[tex]\[\large\bar x=8.5\][/tex] and the sample standard deviation is [tex]\[\large s=2.8\].[/tex]
Since the sample size is small, we must use a t-distribution with n - 1 degrees of freedom. With 99% confidence, α = 0.01/2 = 0.005.
Using a t-table for 5 degrees of freedom and α = 0.005, we get[tex]\[\large t_{\alpha/2}\] = 4.032.[/tex]
On substituting the values, we get the interval as shown below: [tex]\[\large 8.5-4.032\frac{2.8}{\sqrt{6}} < \mu < 8.5+4.032\frac{2.8}{\sqrt{6}}\][/tex]
The confidence interval is (4.16, 12.84).
Therefore, we can be 99% confident that the true mean waiting time is between 4.16 and 12.84 minutes
know more about confidence interval
https://brainly.com/question/32546207
#SPJ11
p2 is ____________ to a3 and ____________ to M1 M2. A. inversely proportional; directly proportional B. inversely proportional; inversely proportional C. directly proportional; directly proportional D. directly proportional; inversely proportional
The p2 directly proportional is to a3 and inversely proportional to M1 M2 (option D).
If p2 is directly proportional to a3, it means that as the value of a3 increases, the value of p2 also increases. This indicates a positive correlation between p2 and a3.
On the other hand, if p2 is inversely proportional to M1 M2, it means that as the value of M1 M2 increases, the value of p2 decreases. This suggests a negative correlation between p2 and M1 M2.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. directly proportional; inversely proportional, as it accurately describes the relationship between p2, a3, and M1 M2.
To know more about proportional:
https://brainly.com/question/31548894
#SPJ4
suppose that is an eigenvalue of the matrix a with associated eigenvector v and that n is a positive integer. show that ? n is an eigenvalue of an with associated eigen?vector v
If λ is an eigenvalue of matrix A with associated eigenvector v, then for any positive integer n, the value λ^n is an eigenvalue of A^n with the same associated eigenvector v.
Let λ be an eigenvalue of matrix A with associated eigenvector v. By definition, we have A v =[tex]λ[/tex] v. We want to show that the value[tex]λ^n[/tex] is an eigenvalue of [tex]A^n[/tex] with the same eigenvector v.
To prove this, we consider the matrix [tex]A^n[/tex]. By the definition of matrix exponentiation, [tex]A^n[/tex]can be obtained by multiplying matrix A by itself n times. Therefore, we have [tex]A^n[/tex] = A * A * ... * A (n times).
Now, let's consider the action of [tex]A^n[/tex] on the eigenvector v. We have [tex]A^n[/tex]v = (A * A * ... * A) v. Since matrix multiplication is associative, we can rearrange the order of multiplication without changing the result. Hence, [tex]A^n[/tex] v = A * (A * ... * (A * (A * v))...).
Since A v = λ v, we can substitute λ v for A v in the above expression repeatedly, n times. This gives us [tex]A^n[/tex] v =[tex]λ^n[/tex] v. Therefore,[tex]λ^n[/tex] is indeed an eigenvalue of[tex]A^n[/tex] with the same associated eigenvector v.
Learn more about matrix here:
https://brainly.com/question/29132693
#SPJ11
When President Donald Trump took office, he believed that the reason he did not win the popular vote was because 3 to 5 million people voted ille-gally. Explain how hypothesis testing might be used in a similar fashion as the legal analogy example
Hypothesis testing would help evaluate the validity of President Trump's belief by providing statistical evidence to support or reject the claim of widespread illegal voting.
In a similar fashion to the legal analogy example, hypothesis testing can be used to examine President Donald Trump's belief that 3 to 5 million people voted illegally in the presidential election.
To conduct a hypothesis test, we can define the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In this case, the null hypothesis would be that there is no significant illegal voting, while the alternative hypothesis would be that there is significant illegal voting.
Next, we would collect data on voting records, investigate cases of potential illegal voting, and analyze the data to determine if it provides evidence for or against the null hypothesis. Statistical techniques such as sampling, data analysis, and inferential statistics can be utilized to test the hypothesis.
For example, we could randomly sample a subset of voting records and compare them against various criteria to identify any potential instances of illegal voting. Based on the results, we can calculate test statistics and p-values to determine if the evidence supports or refutes the claim of illegal voting.
Ultimately, hypothesis testing would help evaluate the validity of President Trump's belief by providing statistical evidence to support or reject the claim of widespread illegal voting.
For more questions on Hypothesis
https://brainly.com/question/29576929
#SPJ8
Comparing a T distribution to a Z distribution, a test statistic with a larger absolute value is more likely by chance alone with a T distribution. Group of answer choices True False
False - A test statistic with a larger absolute value is less likely by chance alone with a T distribution.
False - When comparing a T distribution to a Z distribution, a test statistic with a larger absolute value is less likely by chance alone with a T distribution.
The T distribution has heavier tails compared to the Z distribution, meaning it has more probability in the tails and less in the center. As a result, extreme values or larger absolute values of the test statistic are less likely to occur by chance alone in a T distribution compared to a Z distribution.
The T distribution is typically used when dealing with smaller sample sizes and when the population standard deviation is unknown and estimated from the sample. In such cases, the T distribution accounts for the added uncertainty associated with smaller sample sizes, resulting in a more conservative approach when evaluating the likelihood of extreme test statistics.
To learn more about “probability” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
During the last football season, the percentage of tight ends in the league who made a touchdown reception was 45%. A sports statistician is interested in how the spread of receptions is affected by sampling a different number of tight ends in the league. What is the standard error of the sampling distribution of sample proportions for samples of size n= 32, n=42 and n=52?
The standard error of the sampling distribution of sample proportions for samples of size 32, 42, and 52 can be calculated to determine the spread of receptions among tight ends in the league.
To calculate the standard error of the sampling distribution of sample proportions, we use the formula:
SE = √[p * (1 - p) / n],
where SE is the standard error, p is the proportion of successes (touchdown receptions), and n is the sample size.
Given that the percentage of tight ends who made a touchdown reception was 45% (or 0.45), we can substitute this value into the formula for each sample size.
For n = 32:
SE = √[0.45 * (1 - 0.45) / 32] ≈ 0.0644
For n = 42:
SE = √[0.45 * (1 - 0.45) / 42] ≈ 0.0597
For n = 52:
SE = √[0.45 * (1 - 0.45) / 52] ≈ 0.0533
Therefore, the standard error of the sampling distribution of sample proportions for samples of size 32, 42, and 52 is approximately 0.0644, 0.0597, and 0.0533, respectively. These values indicate the variability or spread of the proportion of tight ends making touchdown receptions when different sample sizes are considered.
To learn more about percentage - brainly.com/question/32197511
SPJ11
evaluate ∫10(−6f(t)−5g(t)) dt given that ∫200f(t) dt=−4, ∫10f(t) dt=4, ∫200g(t) dt=−10, and ∫10g(t) dt=5.
The given integral is ∫10(-6f(t)-5g(t)) dt. The value of the integral ∫10(-6f(t)-5g(t)) dt is -49. To evaluate it, we can distribute the integral and use the properties of linearity of integrals.
1. ∫10(-6f(t)-5g(t)) dt = ∫10(-6f(t)) dt - ∫10(5g(t)) dt
Using the property of linearity, we can split the integral into two parts:
= -6∫10(f(t)) dt - 5∫10(g(t)) dt
Now, we can substitute the given values of the integrals:
= -6(4) - 5(5)
= -24 - 25
= -49
2. Therefore, the value of the integral ∫10(-6f(t)-5g(t)) dt is -49. The explanation of the answer is that we applied the linearity property of integrals to split the integral into two separate integrals. Then, we substituted the given values of the integrals for f(t) and g(t). By simplifying the expression, we obtained the final result of -49.
Learn more about linearity property of integrals here: brainly.com/question/31585009
#SPJ11
One independent survey showed that 70% on people asked like coffee. Another independent survey showed that 80% of people like tea. What is the upper and lower bound of peoples who likes both coffee and tea?
The range of people who like both coffee and tea is between 75% and 75%, with the total number of people who like both being 75%.
If 70% of people like coffee, and 80% of people like tea, the minimum number of people who like both coffee and tea is the smaller percentage, which is 70%. The maximum number of people who like both coffee and tea is the smaller of the two percentages, which is 80%.
Therefore, the range of people who like both coffee and tea is 70% to 80%.
To calculate the actual range, you must first calculate the difference between the two percentages:80% - 70% = 10%
Then divide that difference by 2 and subtract and add it to the smaller number:
10% ÷ 2 = 5%
Lower bound: 70% + 5% = 75%
Upper bound: 80% - 5% = 75%
To know more about range visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29204101
#SPJ11
Pleasee help me this is a test In kite STUV, m ∠ TUV = 80°, and TU=7. Round your answer to the nearest whole number
The length of segment ST, rounded to the nearest whole number is 4
Given: In kite STUV, m ∠ TUV = 80°, and TU=7.
Let's find the length of segment ST using the Pythagorean Theorem.
Pythagorean Theorem states that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. It is used to find the missing side of a right triangle.
Let us draw a diagram and apply the theorem.
Triangle TUV is a right triangle since it contains an angle measuring 90 degrees. Therefore, we can use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the length of TV. Since ST is a diagonal, we can find its length using the distance formula.
Distance Formula:
For two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) in a coordinate plane, the distance between the points is given
byd = √(x₂ − x₁)² + (y₂ − y₁)²
Since we know the coordinates of points S, T, U, and V, we can use the distance formula to find the length of ST. Therefore, ST = √((x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)²)We can substitute the given values to the equation to get
ST = √((2 - 5)² + (3 - 0)²)ST = √((-3)² + 3²)
ST = √(9 + 9)ST = √18ST = 4.24 (rounded to the nearest whole number)
Therefore, the length of ST is 4.
Learn more about Pythagorean Theorem from:
https://brainly.com/question/343682
#SPJ11
A test In kite STUV, m ∠ TUV = 80°, and TU=7. that the measure of angle m∠UTV is 100°.
To solve this problem, the fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. Since that m∠TUV = 80°, find the measure of angle m∠UTV by subtracting 80° from 180°:
m∠UTV = 180° - m∠TUV
m∠UTV = 180° - 80°
m∠UTV = 100°
To know more about angle here
https://brainly.com/question/31818999
#SPJ4
How long will it take 40 bacteria in a certain population to grow to 1,650,000 if it doubles every 14 minutes? Provide your answer in hours rounded to the tenths
It will take 10.2 hours for 40 bacteria to grow to 1,650,000 if it doubles every 14 minutes.
First, we need to find the number of doublings that will occur. Since 1 hour is equal to 60 minutes, 10.2 hours is equal to 612 minutes. Since the bacteria doubles every 14 minutes, there will be 612 / 14 = 43 doublings.
Next, we need to find the final number of bacteria. Since the bacteria doubles every time, the final number of bacteria will be 40 * 2^43 = 1,650,000.
Therefore, it will take 10.2 hours for 40 bacteria to grow to 1,650,000 if it doubles every 14 minutes.
To learn more about population here brainly.com/question/29095323
#SPJ11
8. Find the measure of
212 degrees
148 degrees
74 degrees
106 degrees
The value of the angle m<CED = 74 degrees
How to determine the valueTo determine the value of the angle, we need to take note of the following;
The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is 180 degreesSupplementary angles are defined as angles that sum up to 180 degreesComplementary angles are defined as angles that sum up to 90 degreesThe measure of the angles on a straight line is 180 degreesFrom the information given, we have that;
m<BEC = 106 degrees
But we have that;
m<BEC + m<CED = 180 degrees
Substitute the values, we have;
m<CED = 180 - 106
subtract the values
m<CED = 74 degrees
Learn more about supplementary angles at: https://brainly.com/question/12919120
#SPJ1
A vertical curve length is 683 feet. The PVC is at sta. 81 00 and the elevation of PCI is 434 feet. The grade into the curve is 3.6% and the grade out of the curve is -4.2%. What is the elevation of PVT
The elevation of the Point of Vertical Tangency (PVT) is approximately 436.295 feet.
To determine the elevation of the Point of Vertical Tangency (PVT), we need to calculate the change in elevation from the Point of Vertical Curvature (PVC) to the Point of Crest (POC) and then subtract it from the elevation of the PVC.
Given information:
Vertical curve length (L) = 683 feet
PVC station (sta.) = 81+00
Elevation of PVC (Elevation_PVC) = 434 feet
Grade into the curve (Grade_in) = 3.6%
Grade out of the curve (Grade_out) = -4.2%
First, let's find the change in elevation from PVC to POC:
Change in Elevation = L * (Grade_in + Grade_out) / 200
Substituting the given values:
Change in Elevation = 683 * (0.036 - 0.042) / 200
Calculating the change in elevation:
Change in Elevation = 683 * (-0.006) / 200
Change in Elevation = -2.295 feet
Next, we can find the elevation of the PVT by subtracting the change in elevation from the elevation of the PVC:
Elevation of PVT = Elevation_PVC - Change in Elevation
Elevation of PVT = 434 - (-2.295)
Elevation of PVT = 434 + 2.295
Elevation of PVT = 436.295 feet
Therefore, the elevation of the Point of Vertical Tangency (PVT) is approximately 436.295 feet.
for such more question on Point of Vertical Tangency
https://brainly.com/question/17074269
#SPJ11
You are performing a hypothesis test of a single population proportion. You find out that np is less than five. What must you do to be able to perform a valid hypothesis test
Use an alternative method such as the binomial test or the exact test for proportions when np is less than five.
When the product of the sample size (n) and the population proportion (p) is less than five (np < 5), the conditions for applying the normal approximation to the binomial distribution are not met. In such cases, it is recommended to use alternative methods to perform a valid hypothesis test.
One common approach is to utilize the exact test or Fisher's exact test. This method calculates the probabilities directly based on the binomial distribution, providing more accurate results when the sample size is small or np is low.
By employing the exact test, you consider all possible outcomes and calculate the exact probabilities of observing the data under the null hypothesis. This allows for a reliable hypothesis test, even when the normal approximation is not suitable.
Therefore, to perform a valid hypothesis test when np is less than five, you should opt for the exact test or Fisher's exact test rather than relying on the normal approximation.
To learn more about “hypothesis test” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/4232174
#SPJ11
help please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
24 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a rhombus is half the product of its diagonals.
[tex]\boxed{\sf Area\;of\;a\;rhombus=\dfrac{diagonal\;1 \cdot diagonal\;2}{2}}[/tex]
Therefore, to find the area of the rhombus, we need to find the lengths of the diagonals AC and BD.
The diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular bisectors of each other.
The point of intersection of the diagonals of rhombus ABCD is point O.
We can use the given information to find the lengths of BO and OC, then double these to find diagonals AC and BD.
The sides of a rhombus are equal in length. Therefore, if the perimeter of rhombus ABCD is 20 cm, each side length is 5 cm.
Therefore, the hypotenuse of right triangle BOC is BC = 5 cm.
If the ratio of AC : BD = 4 : 3, then the ratio of OC : BO = 2 : 1.5.
Let OC = 2x and BO = 1.5x.
Use Pythagoras Theorem to find the value of x.
[tex]\begin{aligned}BO^2+OC^2&=BC^2\\(1.5x)^2+(2x)^2&=5^2\\1.5^2x^2+2^2x^2&=25\\2.25x^2+4x^2&=25\\6.25x^2&=25\\x^2&=4\\\sqrt{x^2}&=\sqrt{4}\\x&=2\end{aligned}[/tex]
Therefore, to find the lengths of OC and BO, substitute x = 2:
[tex]OC = 2x = 2(2) = 4\; \sf cm[/tex]
[tex]BO = 1.5x = 1.5(2) = 3\; \sf cm[/tex]
As the diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other:
[tex]AC = 2\cdot OC=2 \cdot 4 = 8\; \sf cm[/tex]
[tex]BD = 2\cdot BO=2 \cdot 3 = 6\; \sf cm[/tex]
Finally, substitute the lengths of the diagonals into the formula for the area of a rhombus:
[tex]\begin{aligned}\textsf{Area of rhombus $ABCD$}&=\sf \dfrac{diagonal\;1 \cdot diagonal\;2}{2}}\\\\&= \dfrac{AC \cdot BD}{2}\\\\&=\dfrac{8 \cdot 6}{2}\\\\&=\dfrac{48}{2}\\\\&=24\; \sf cm^2 \end{aligned}[/tex]
Therefore, the area of rhombus ABCD is 24 cm².
On a winter night the air temperature cooled to the dew point and fog was formed. Before the formation of fog, the dew point remained almost constant. After the fog formed, the dew point began to decrease. Explain why?
Before the formation of fog, the dew point remained almost constant, and after the fog formed, the dew point began to decrease because of the continuous process of condensation.
Fog is a type of cloud that is formed by the condensation of water vapor present in the air on small particles like dust, smoke or salt, etc. which forms the nuclei for condensation.
During the winter night, when the temperature is cool and the air cools down, the dew point temperature also drops down.
The dew point temperature is the temperature below which the air starts to cool down, and the water vapors present in the air start to condense.
When the air temperature becomes equal to the dew point temperature, it starts to condense and form fog.
Before the formation of fog, the dew point remained almost constant because the air temperature was not as low as it was required to cool down the water vapors present in the air to the dew point temperature.
The dew point temperature remains constant until the air temperature drops below the dew point temperature.
After the fog formed, the dew point began to decrease because the process of condensation of water vapor continues to occur and the water vapors present in the air continue to convert into water droplets.
As the water droplets are removed from the air, it causes the humidity of the air to decrease, which in turn causes the dew point temperature to decrease.
Hence, on a winter night, the air temperature cooled to the dew point and fog was formed.
Before the formation of fog, the dew point remained almost constant, and after the fog formed, the dew point began to decrease because of the continuous process of condensation.
Learn more about dew point
https://brainly.com/question/12485698
#SPJ11
The general manager, marketing director, and 3 other employees of Company A are hosting a visit by the vice president and 2 other employees of Company B. The eight people line up in a random order to take a photo. Every way of lining up the people is equally likely. (a) What is the probability that the general manager is next to the vice president
The probability that GM is next to VP is 3/7.
We are given that;
Number of employees=3
Company B= 2
Now,
We can use this formula to find the total number of ways to arrange eight people in a line, which is P(8,8):
[tex]$$P(8,8) = \frac{8!}{(8-8)!} = \frac{8!}{0!} = \frac{8!}{1} = 8! = 40320$$[/tex]
We can also use this formula to find the number of ways to arrange GM and VP next to each other, which is P(2,2):
[tex]$$P(2,2) = \frac{2!}{(2-2)!} = \frac{2!}{0!} = \frac{2!}{1} = 2! = 2$$[/tex]
We also need to consider that GM and VP can be next to each other in six different positions: (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5), (5,6), or (6,7). For each position, we have two ways to arrange GM and VP (GM-VP or VP-GM). So, we need to multiply P(2,2) by 6 and by 2 to get the total number of ways to arrange GM and VP next to each other in any position:
[tex]$$P(2,2) \times 6 \times 2 = 24$$[/tex]
Finally, we need to consider that for each arrangement of GM and VP next to each other, we have six other people who can be arranged in any order in the remaining six positions. The number of ways to arrange six people in six positions is P(6,6):
[tex]$$P(6,6) = \frac{6!}{(6-6)!} = \frac{6!}{0!} = \frac{6!}{1} = 6! = 720$$[/tex]
So, we need to multiply P(2,2) by 6 by 2 by P(6,6) to get the total number of ways to arrange eight people in a line such that GM is next to VP:
[tex]$$P(2,2) \times 6 \times 2 \times P(6,6) = 24 \times 720 = 17280$$[/tex]
To find P(A), we need to divide this number by the total number of ways to arrange eight people in a line:
[tex]$$P(A) = \frac{P(2,2) \times 6 \times 2 \times P(6,6)}{P(8,8)} = \frac{17280}{40320} = \frac{3}{7}$$[/tex]
Therefore, by probability the answer will be 3/7.
Learn more about probability here;
https://brainly.com/question/9326835
#SPJ4
A circle is inscribed in a regular octagon. If the perimeter of the octagon is 16, what is the circumference of the circle
The circumference of the circle inscribed in the regular octagon is approximately 4.8046.
How long is the octagon's circumference?To find the circumference of the circle inscribed in a regular octagon, we need to determine the length of one side of the octagon first. Since the octagon is regular, all its sides are equal in length.
Let's denote the length of one side of the octagon as "s". Since the perimeter of the octagon is given as 16, the sum of all eight sides of the octagon is equal to 16:
8s = 16
Dividing both sides of the equation by 8, we find:
s = 16/8
s = 2
So, the length of one side of the octagon is 2.
To find the circumference of the circle inscribed in the octagon, we can use the relationship between the radius of the circle and the side length of the octagon. In a regular octagon, the radius of the inscribed circle is equal to the distance from the center of the octagon to one of its vertices. This radius is also the apothem of the octagon.
The apothem of a regular octagon can be calculated using the formula:
apothem = s/(2 * tan(π/8))
where "s" is the length of one side of the octagon.
Substituting the value of "s" we found earlier:
apothem = 2/(2 * tan(π/8))
Now, let's calculate the value of the apothem:
apothem ≈ 0.7654
The circumference of the circle is equal to 2π times the radius, which in this case is the apothem:
circumference = 2π * apothem
Substituting the value of the apothem we found:
circumference ≈ 2π * 0.7654
circumference ≈ 4.8046
Therefore, the circumference of the circle inscribed in the regular octagon is approximately 4.8046.
Learn more about octagon
brainly.com/question/30182906
#SPJ11
find the average rate of change in the interval from 6 to 7
The average rate of change in the interval from 6 to 7 cannot be determined without the specific function or data set.
To calculate the average rate of change, we need a function that describes the relationship between two variables, typically denoted as f(x). Without this function or any data points, we don't have the necessary information to perform the calculation.
The average rate of change is typically determined by finding the difference in the function's values at the endpoints of the interval and dividing it by the length of the interval. In this case, the interval is from 6 to 7, so the length of the interval is 7 - 6 = 1.
If we had the function or data set, we could calculate the average rate of change using the following formula:
Average Rate of Change = (f(7) - f(6)) / (7 - 6)
Without the specific function or data set, it is not possible to calculate the average rate of change in the interval from 6 to 7. To determine the average rate of change, we need the function or at least some data points that describe the relationship between the variables.
To know more about rate of change , visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29181688
#SPJ11
How much does the hourly capacity of the dry-cleaning machine change if tanks are switched only every 5 runs
The final result represents the change in hourly capacity when tanks are switched every 5 runs instead of 6 runs.
To calculate the change in the hourly capacity of the dry-cleaning machine when tanks are switched every 5 runs instead of 6 runs, we need the following information:
Original hourly capacity: Let's assume the machine has an original hourly capacity of X garments per hour.Number of runs per hour: Let's assume the machine runs Y times per hour.Number of runs before tank switch: Let's assume the machine can complete Z runs before needing a tank switch.With these assumptions, we can calculate the hourly capacity change as follows:
Calculate the number of tank switches per hour with the original setup: Since the machine runs Y times per hour and a tank switch occurs every Z runs, the number of tank switches per hour is Y/Z.Calculate the original capacity reduction per tank switch: Since a tank switch takes time, it reduces the machine's capacity. Let's assume the original capacity reduction per tank switch is R garments.Calculate the original capacity reduction per hour due to tank switches: Multiply the number of tank switches per hour by the original capacity reduction per tank switch. This is equal to (Y/Z) * R.Now, let's calculate the change in capacity when tanks are switched every 5 runs instead of 6 runs:
Calculate the number of tank switches per hour with the new setup: Since the machine runs Y times per hour and a tank switch occurs every 5 runs, the number of tank switches per hour is Y/5.Calculate the new capacity reduction per tank switch: Assuming the same tank switch time, the new capacity reduction per tank switch is still R garments.Calculate the new capacity reduction per hour due to tank switches: Multiply the number of tank switches per hour with the new capacity reduction per tank switch. This is equal to (Y/5) * R.To find the change in hourly capacity, subtract the new capacity reduction per hour due to tank switches from the original capacity reduction per hour due to tank switches:
Capacity change = (Y/Z) * R - (Y/5) * R
The final result represents the change in hourly capacity when tanks are switched every 5 runs instead of 6 runs.
Learn more about Capacity at
brainly.com/question/29794179
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Find the attached image for complete question.
Kelvin found that the least common denominator needed to subtract 22−9 2 x x 2 - 9 – 1+3 1 x + 3 is (x + 3)(x – 3). Which is a correct next step?
The least common denominator for the given fractions is (x+6)(x-2). Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
The given expression is [tex]\frac{x}{x^2+4x-12}-\frac{3}{x+6}[/tex] and the least common denominator is (x+6)(x-2).
When two or more fractions have the same denominators, they are termed as the common denominators. The least common denominator (LCD) refers to the smallest number that is a common denominator for a given set of fractions.
Here, [tex]\frac{x}{x^2+6x-2x-12}-\frac{3}{x+6}[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{x}{x(x+6)-2(x+6)}-\frac{3}{x+6}[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{x}{(x+6)(x-2)}-\frac{3}{x+6}[/tex]
Here, least common denominator is (x+6)(x-2)
[tex]=\frac{x}{(x+6)(x-2)}-\frac{3(x-2)}{(x+6)(x-2)}[/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
Learn more about the least common denominators here:
brainly.com/question/8393834.
#SPJ12
"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"
Kelvin found that the least common denominator needed to subtract [tex]\frac{x}{x^2+4x-12}-\frac{3}{x+6}[/tex] is is (x+6)(x-2). Which is the correct next step?
A) [tex]\frac{x-3}{x^2+3x-18}[/tex]
B) [tex]\frac{x}{(x+6)(x-2)} - \frac{3(x-2)}{(x+6)(x-2)}[/tex]
C) [tex]\frac{x}{(x+6)(x-2)} - \frac{3(x+2)}{(x+6)(x-2)}[/tex]
D) [tex]\frac{x(x+6)(x-2)}{(x+6)(x-2)} - \frac{3(x+6)(x-2)}{(x+6)(x-2)}[/tex]
In a class of 30 students, there are 14 girls and 16 boys. Of the girls, 5 have blonde hair and 9 have dark hair. Of the boys, 12 have dark hair and 4 have blonde hair. What is the probability of randomly choosing 2 blonde girls and 3 dark haired boys if 5 students are randomly chosen to be class representatives
The probability of randomly choosing 2 blonde girls and 3 dark-haired boys as class representatives, given the provided information, can be calculated as 0.0714 or approximately 7.14%.
To calculate the probability, we need to consider the total number of possible outcomes and the number of favorable outcomes. The total number of ways to choose 5 students from a class of 30 is given by the binomial coefficient C(30, 5), which is calculated as 30! / (5! * (30-5)!), resulting in 142,506 possible outcomes.
For the favorable outcomes, we need to consider the number of ways to choose 2 blonde girls out of 5 (C(5, 2)) and 3 dark-haired boys out of 12 (C(12, 3)). The number of favorable outcomes is given by C(5, 2) * C(12, 3), which is equal to 10 * 220 = 2,200.
Therefore, the probability is calculated as the number of favorable outcomes divided by the total number of possible outcomes: 2,200 / 142,506 ≈ 0.0714 or approximately 7.14%.
Hence, the probability of randomly choosing 2 blonde girls and 3 dark-haired boys as class representatives is approximately 7.14%.
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
find a pair of factors of 25 with the difference of 24
The factors of 25 that have the difference of 24 are -1 and -25
What is a factor?Factor, is a number or algebraic expression that divides another number or expression i.e with no remainder.
For example the factors of 8 are , 1, 2,4 ,8 this means that 8/1 = 8
8/2 = 4 and 8/4 = 2
Similarly, the factors of 25 are 1,-1, -5, 5 ,25and -25.
This means that, 25/-25 = -1
25/5 = 5.
Therefore the factors of 25 that will have a difference of 24 will be
-1 -(-25)
= -1 + 25
= 24
Therefore that factors of 25 that will give a difference of 24 are -1 and -25
learn more about factors from
https://brainly.com/question/219464
#SPJ4
When a flame suddenly contacts one side of a glass pane while the unexposed side is relatively cool, a stress can develop between the two faces and the glass can fracture between the faces. _____ is a term used in the fire investigation community to describe a complicated pattern of short cracks in glass arising from this condition.
Stress fracturing is a term used in the fire investigation community to describe a complicated pattern of short cracks in glass arising from this condition.
When a flame comes into contact with one side of a glass pane, it heats that side, causing it to expand. At the same time, the unexposed side of the glass remains relatively cool and does not expand as much. This temperature gradient creates non-uniform expansion and differential stresses within the glass. As a result, the glass may fracture between the faces, forming a complex pattern of short cracks.
Stress fracturing is a phenomenon commonly observed in fire investigations, particularly in situations where rapid heating or cooling of glass occurs. It is important to understand and analyze these patterns to gain insights into the behavior of glass under fire conditions and to help determine the sequence of events during a fire incident.
learn more about stress fracturing here:
https://brainly.com/question/29633198
#SPJ4
