a customer can choose one of six amplifiers, one of four compact disc players, and one of eight speaker models for an entertainment system. determine the number of possible system configurations.

Therefore, the value of x that divides the area bounded by the x-axis and the function 3/(2y^2) = x^3 into two sectors of equal area is [(4/9)ln(2y^2)/a^3]^(-1/3).

To find a value of x that divides the area bounded by the x-axis and the function 3/(2y^2) = x^3 into two sectors of equal area, we need to solve for x.

The area bounded by the x-axis and the function is given by:

A = ∫(3/(2y^2)) dx from x = 0 to x = x

Using u-substitution with u = 2y^2 and du/dx = 6x^2, we can rewrite the integral as:

A = ∫(3/u) du/6x^2 from u = 0 to u = 2y^2

A = (1/2) ln(u) / 6x^2 from u = 0 to u = 2y^2

A = (1/2) ln(2y^2) / 6x^2 - (1/2) ln(0) / 6x^2

Note that the ln(0) term is undefined and can be ignored since we are only interested in finding the value of x that divides the area into two equal parts.

To find the value of x that divides the area into two equal parts, we set the integral expression equal to half of the total area:

(1/2) ln(2y^2) / 6x^2 = 1/2 ∫(3/(2y^2)) dx from x = 0 to x = a

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

x = [ln(2y^2) / 9 ∫(3/(2y^2)) dx from x = 0 to x = a)]^(-1/3)

Evaluating the integral and simplifying further, we get:

x = [(4/9)ln(2y^2)/a^3]^(-1/3)

To know more about function,

https://brainly.com/question/13502079

#SPJ11

Therefore, the gradient field is: ∇g(x,y,z) = ⟨ -2x/(x^2+y^2), -2y/(x^2+y^2), e^z ⟩.

The gradient of the function g(x,y,z)=ez−ln(x2+y2) is given by:

∇g(x,y,z) = ⟨ ∂g/∂x, ∂g/∂y, ∂g/∂z ⟩

Taking partial derivatives:

∂g/∂x = -2x/(x^2+y^2)

∂g/∂y = -2y/(x^2+y^2)

∂g/∂z = e^z

To know more about gradient field,

https://brainly.com/question/29815461

#SPJ11

The coordinates of the image of triangle ABC after it is translated 6 units down are given as follows:

A'(1, -8), B'(9, -8), C'(5,-6).

The four translation rules are defined as follows:

The coordinates for triangle ABC are given as follows:

A(1, -2), B(9, -2), C(5,2).

The translation rule for a translation 6 units down is given as follows:

(x,y) -> (x, y - 6).

Hence the coordinates of the image are given as follows:

A'(1, -8), B'(9, -8), C'(5,-6).

More can be learned about translation at brainly.com/question/29209050

#SPJ1

In an ideal form, action research is a collaborative process in which the researcher is actively engaged with those experiencing the problem versus conducting research on them.

In an ideal form, action research is a collaborative process in which the researcher is actively engaged with those experiencing the problem versus conducting research on them. This means that the researcher works together with the stakeholders to identify the problem, collect data, and develop and implement solutions. Action research is characterized by a cyclical process of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting, which allows for continuous improvement and adaptation. This approach emphasizes the importance of participation, empowerment, and social change. It recognizes that the people affected by the problem are the best experts on their own experiences and can contribute valuable insights and knowledge to the research process. Action research is particularly useful for complex and context-specific issues, as it allows for a more nuanced understanding of the problem and the development of tailored solutions. Overall, action research is a powerful tool for promoting social justice and creating meaningful change in the world.

Know more about action research here,

https://brainly.com/question/32095182

#SPJ11

Answer:Length of the prism is 9 cm.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given,

A rectangular prism with volume 72 cm², width 2 cm and height.

As, we know,

Volume of a rectangular prism = Length × Width × Height

i.e. 72 = Length × 2 × 4

i.e. 72 = Length × 8

i.e. Length =

i.e. Length = 9 cm.

Hence, the length of the prism is 9 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 80,000 possible 9-digit telephone numbers that can be formed if the last digit cannot be zero and the first 4 digits are 5286. The solution is obtained by calculating the number of choices for the last digit (8) and the number of combinations for the remaining 4 digits (10,000), and then multiplying these two values together.

To determine how many 9-digit telephone numbers are possible if the last digit cannot be zero and the first 4 digits are 5286, we need to consider how many choices we have for each of the remaining 5 digits.

Since the first 4 digits are already specified as 5286, we only need to choose the last 5 digits. The last digit cannot be zero, so we have 9 - 1 = 8 choices for the last digit.

For the remaining 4 digits, we have 10 choices for each digit (0-9), so there are 10^4 = 10,000 possible combinations of these digits.

Therefore, the total number of possible 9-digit telephone numbers that satisfy the given conditions is the product of the number of choices for the last digit and the number of combinations for the remaining 4 digits, which is 8 x 10,000 = 80,000.

Visit here to learn more about combinations:

brainly.com/question/29089154

#SPJ11

Answer:

24 units

Step-by-step explanation:

The Pythagorean theorem states that for a right triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (c) is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides (a and b). Using this formula, we can solve for the length of the missing side:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2

26^2 = 10^2 + b^2

676 = 100 + b^2

b^2 = 576

b = sqrt(576)

b = 24

Therefore, the length of side b is 24 units.

[tex]\begin{array}{llll} \textit{using the pythagorean theorem} \\\\ a^2+o^2=c^2\implies o=\sqrt{c^2 - a^2} \end{array} \qquad \begin{cases} c=\stackrel{hypotenuse}{26}\\ a=\stackrel{adjacent}{10}\\ o=\stackrel{opposite}{b} \end{cases} \\\\\\ b=\sqrt{ 26^2 - 10^2}\implies b=\sqrt{ 676 - 100 } \implies b=\sqrt{ 576 }\implies b=24[/tex]

In mathematical analysis, the radius of convergence is a value that indicates the interval in which a power series converges. Therefore, the radius of convergence is r = ∞.

To find the radius of convergence, we can use the ratio test:

[tex]|(-1)^n x^n 2n ln(n+1)| / |(-1)^n x^n 2n ln(n)|[/tex]

= |ln(n+1)/ln(n)|

As n goes to infinity, this ratio approaches 1, so the series converges if x^n 2n ln(n) has the same behavior as a convergent geometric series when n is large. The ratio test is inconclusive when the ratio approaches 1, so we need to examine the endpoints:

When x = 0, the series converges to 0.

When x = ±∞, the series diverges.

Therefore, the radius of convergence is r = ∞.

To learn more about “convergence” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/28169281

#SPJ11

Answer:

I would guess because I'm not smart and need physical help

The number of hands that contain exactly 3 kings when 6 cards are randomly chosen are :

69,184

In a standard deck of playing cards, there are 52 cards, including 4 kings. To determine how many hands contain exactly 3 kings when 6 cards are randomly chosen, we'll use combinations.

First, we need to choose 3 kings from the 4 available kings:
C(4,3) = 4! / (3! * (4-3)!) = 4

Next, we need to choose the remaining 3 cards from the 48 cards that are not kings:
C(48,3) = 48! / (3! * (48-3)!) = 17,296

Now, multiply these two combinations together to find the total number of hands with exactly 3 kings:
4 * 17,296 = 69,184

So, there are 69,184 hands that contain exactly 3 kings when 6 cards are randomly chosen from a standard deck of playing cards.

To learn more about permutations and combinations visit : https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

A statement that correctly compares the areas of these two rectangles is that the area of the yellow rectangle is greater than the area of the blue rectangle by 8 square units.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the area of a rectangle can be calculated by using the following mathematical equation:

A = LW

Where:

Based on the information provided about these rectangles, we have the following:

Area of blue rectangle = 10 × 4

Area of blue rectangle = 40 square units.

Area of yellow rectangle = 6 × 8

Area of yellow rectangle = 48 square units.

Difference = Area of yellow rectangle - Area of blue rectangle

Difference = 48 - 40

Difference = 8 square units.

Read more on area of a rectangle here: brainly.com/question/29604954

#SPJ1

The value of angle D and length of sides /FD/ and /FE/ in the right angle triangle below are 31°, 13.7 and 8.2 respectively.

A right angled triangle is a triangle in which one of the angles is 90°.

To calculate angle D in the right angle triangle, we use the formula below

Given:

Substitiute these values into equation 1

To calculate the length FD, we use the formula below

Given:

Substitute into equation 2

To calculate /FE/ use the formula below

Learn more about right angle traingle here: https://brainly.com/question/31203729

#SPJ1

We have found an x ∈ R such that f(x) = y for any y ∈ R, which means that f is onto.

(a) To prove that f is one-to-one, we need to show that if f(x1) = f(x2), then x1 = x2 for any x1, x2 ∈ R.

So, suppose f(x1) = f(x2). Then, we have:

3x1 - 5 = 3x2 - 5

Simplifying this equation, we get:

3x1 = 3x2

Dividing both sides by 3, we get:

x1 = x2

Thus, we have shown that if f(x1) = f(x2), then x1 = x2, which means that f is one-to-one.

(b) To prove that f is onto, we need to show that for any y ∈ R, there exists an x ∈ R such that f(x) = y.

So, let y ∈ R be arbitrary. We need to find an x ∈ R such that f(x) = y.

We have:

f(x) = 3x - 5

Setting this equal to y, we get:

3x - 5 = y

Adding 5 to both sides and dividing by 3, we get:

x = (y + 5)/3

Thus, we have found an x ∈ R such that f(x) = y for any y ∈ R, which means that f is onto.

To know more about arbitrary refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31828007#

#SPJ11

The average rate of change for the function is  (2cos(9) - 2cos(1)) / 2.

To find the average rate of change for the function f(x) = 2cos(x^2) on the interval [1, 3], we can use the formula:

Average rate of change = (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a)

Here, a = 1 and b = 3. First, we need to evaluate f(a) and f(b):

f(1) = 2cos(1^2) = 2cos(1)
f(3) = 2cos(3^2) = 2cos(9)

Now, plug these values into the formula:

Average rate of change = (2cos(9) - 2cos(1)) / (3 - 1)
Average rate of change = (2cos(9) - 2cos(1)) / 2

This is the average rate of change for the function f(x) = 2cos(x^2) on the interval [1, 3].

To learn more about function, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The coordinates of point b are :

(4.25,8.25)

To find the point b, we need to use the concept of dividing a segment in a given ratio. We can use the following formula to find the coordinates of point b:

b = ( (1-r) * a + r * c ), where r is the ratio in which the segment is divided.

Here, the ratio is 3:1, which means that ab is three times smaller than bc.

So we can write :

r = 3/(3+1) = 0.75

Substituting the values in the formula, we get:

b = ( (1-0.75) * (2,6) + 0.75 * (5,9) )
b = ( 0.25 * (2,6) + 0.75 * (5,9) )
b = ( (0.5,1.5) + (3.75,6.75) )
b = (4.25,8.25)

Therefore, the coordinates of point b are (4.25,8.25).

To learn more about coordinates visit : https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ11

The point B that partitions the line segment AC with endpoints A(2,6) and C(5,9) into a 3:1 ratio is found using the formula for dividing a line segment in a specific ratio. Upon substituting the given values into the formula, we get the coordinates of point B as (3.75, 8.25).

The subject of your question is Mathematics, specifically, it involves the concept of partitioning a line segment in a certain ratio. In this case, we are given a segment with endpoints A (2,6) and C (5,9), and a point B partitions this line into a ratio of 3:1. We can use the formula for dividing a line segment in a given ratio to find point B. The formula is:

[(m*x2 + n*x1) / (m+n), (m*y2 + n*y1) / (m+n)] where x1, y1 and x2, y2 are the coordinates of the two points and m:n is the given ratio. Let's substitute the known values into the formula: B = [(3*5 + 1*2) / (3+1) , (3*9 + 1*6) / (3+1) ] =

(3.75, 8.25) .Therefore, your answer is (3.75, 8.25).

https://brainly.com/question/33722858

#SPJ11

The first-order Taylor formula for f(x, y) = 19x at (0, 0) is f(x, y) ≈ 19x.

To find the first-order and second-order Taylor formulas for the function f(x, y) = 19x at the point (0, 0), we need to calculate the partial derivatives of the function at that point.

The first-order Taylor formula is given by:

f(x, y) ≈ f(0, 0) + ∂f/∂x(0, 0)(x - 0) + ∂f/∂y(0, 0)(y - 0)

Since f(x, y) = 19x, the partial derivatives are:

∂f/∂x = 19

∂f/∂y = 0

Plugging these values into the first-order Taylor formula, we get:

f(x, y) ≈ f(0, 0) + 19(x - 0) + 0(y - 0)

        ≈ 0 + 19x + 0

        ≈ 19x

Therefore, the first-order Taylor formula for f(x, y) = 19x at (0, 0) is f(x, y) ≈ 19x.

The Series Theorem of Taylor

Assume that f(x) is a real or composite function and that it is a differentiable function of a real or composite neighbourhood number. The following power series is then described by the Taylor series: f (x) = f ′ (a) (a) 1! ( x − a ) + f ” ( a ) 2 !

To learn more about Taylor formula from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28168045

#SPJ4

Answer:

The correct answer is 5b²-b-2

The 98% confidence interval for the mean time spent on paperwork by all managers is approximately 1.514 hours to 3.286 hours.

What is the confidence interval?

A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the true value of an unknown population parameter, such as the population mean or population proportion. It is based on a sample from the population and the level of confidence chosen by the researcher.

To construct a confidence interval for the mean time spent on paperwork by all managers, we can use the following formula:

Confidence Interval = sample mean ± (critical value * standard error)

First, we need to calculate the standard error, which is the standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size:

Standard Error = standard deviation / √(sample size)

In this case, the sample size is 20 and the standard deviation is 1.30 hours. Let's calculate the standard error:

Standard Error = 1.30 / √(20) ≈ 0.290

Next, we need to find the critical value corresponding to a 98% confidence level. Since we have a sample size of 20, we can use a t-distribution. For a 98% confidence level with 19 degrees of freedom (20 - 1), the critical value is approximately 2.861.

Now we can calculate the confidence interval:

Confidence Interval = 2.4 ± (2.861 * 0.290)

Lower Bound = 2.4 - (2.861 * 0.290) ≈ 1.514

Upper Bound = 2.4 + (2.861 * 0.290) ≈ 3.286

Therefore, the 98% confidence interval for the mean time spent on paperwork by all managers is approximately 1.514 hours to 3.286 hours.

Learn more about the confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

Matrix factorization is a method that reduces the dimensionality of a rating matrix, revealing latent factors and enabling clustering in recommendation systems and data analysis.

Matrix factorization is a popular technique used in recommendation systems and data analysis. Its basic intuition lies in decomposing a large rating matrix into lower-dimensional matrices, allowing for better understanding and utilization of the underlying data.

One key intuition is that matrix factorization provides a way to represent users and items in a shared low-dimensional space. By factorizing the rating matrix, we can identify latent factors or features that capture the preferences and characteristics of both users and items. These factors can be computed from the rating matrix and enable a compact representation of the data.

Another insight is that matrix factorization allows for clustering of users and items. By factoring the user and item matrices, we can partition them into clusters based on similar characteristics. This clustering enables us to treat users or items within the same cluster identically, reducing computational complexity and making recommendations more efficient by retaining representative users or items in each cluster.

Furthermore, matrix factorization reveals that content filtering and collaborative filtering are two different factorizations of the same rating matrix. Content filtering focuses on the attributes of items, while collaborative filtering analyzes user-item interactions. By factorizing the matrix, we can bridge the gap between these two approaches and gain a more comprehensive understanding of the data.

Therefore, the basic intuition behind matrix factorization lies in finding a lower-dimensional representation of the rating matrix, identifying latent factors, enabling clustering of users and items, and providing a shared space to describe them. This technique proves valuable in recommendation systems, data analysis, and uncovering hidden patterns within complex datasets.

To learn more about Matrix factorization from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/30244970

#SPJ4

Answer: Obtuse.

Step-by-step explanation:

Acute is a triangle that mesures less than 90 degrees on every side. Therefore it is small. (picture acute saying 'a cute' because its so cute and small haha)

Obtuse is a triangle that has 2 acute angles (Less than 90 degrees), and 1 angle that's larger than 90 degrees.

A right triangle is a triangle with 1 angle that equals to 90 degrees.

Therefore, this triangle is an obtuse.

Hope you get an A+ <3

Answer:

72 fahrenheit

Step-by-step explanation:

looking at line of best fit, the number of cocoas reduce by 7 for every 8 degree reduction in temperature.

we have point (48, 49). that is 49 cocoas at 48 degrees.

28 cocoas is 21 (3 X 7) less than this point.

so the temperature will be 48 + (3 X 8) degrees = 48 + 24 =72 (degrees)

The equation y = 17.5x represents the train's travel, where y represents the total number of miles traveled in x hours.

The equation y = 17.5x represents a linear relationship between the total number of miles traveled (y) by the train and the number of hours (x) it has been traveling. The equation implies that for every hour the train travels, it covers 17.5 miles. The coefficient 17.5 represents the rate at which the train is covering distance. For example, if the train travels for 2 hours, the total distance covered would be 17.5 * 2 = 35 miles. This equation allows us to calculate the distance traveled for any given time duration.

Learn more about Equation

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The limit of f(x, y) as (x, y) approaches (4, -4) is indeterminate.

Evaluate the limit of the expression f(x, y) = 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 3[tex]y^{2}[/tex] / (x + y) as (x, y) approaches (4, -4), we can substitute the given values into the expression and see if it converges to a specific value or if it is indeterminate.

Let's substitute x = 4 and y = -4 into the expression:

f(4, -4) = 3([tex]4^{2}[/tex] - 3(-[tex]4^{2}[/tex] / (4 + (-4))

= 3(16) - 3(16) / 0

Here, we encounter a problem because the denominator is 0. Dividing by 0 is undefined, and in this case, it leads to an indeterminate form.

Therefore, the limit of f(x, y) as (x, y) approaches (4, -4) is indeterminate.

To know more about limit refer here

https://brainly.com/question/23944551#

#SPJ11

The correct phrase is a horizontal shift of 2 units right and vertical shift of 3 units up.

The modification of an existing graph or graphed equation to create a different version of the following graph is known as translation.

We know that the translation of any graph or a function meant changing the position from one to another.

It is given that the two functions are:

Let's check that in what way the first function is translated to second function.

So, the first function can be written as:

[tex]\sf y = (x + 2 - 2)^2[/tex]

or

[tex]\sf y = x^2[/tex]

Here, the function is translated by 2 units right.

Now, if we add 3 to the above function we get:

[tex]\sf y = x^2 + 3[/tex]

Here, the function is translated by 3 units up.

Therefore, a horizontal shift of 2 units right and vertical shift of 3 units up has been done in the parent function.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Learn more about translation of a graph with the given link provided below: https://brainly.com/question/32062444

There are 9698 positive values of n that satisfy the given conditions.

Solving for n in each inequality, we get:
3000 ≤ n ≤ 29997

To determine the number of positive values of n for which both n/3 and 3n are four-digit integers, we can set up the following equation:
1000 ≤ n/3 ≤ 9999
3000 ≤ 3n ≤ 29997
Solving for n in each inequality, we get:
3000 ≤ n ≤ 29997
Therefore, there are more than 100 positive values of n that satisfy the condition. In fact, there are 9698 positive integers between 3000 and 29997 (inclusive) that meet the criteria of being both four-digit integers when divided by 3 and multiplied by 3. So, the answer to the question is that there are 9698 positive values of n that satisfy the given conditions.

To know more about positive values visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14803747

#SPJ11

Let's simplify the denominator first:

2x + x√x = x(2 + √x)

Now, we can write the integral as:

∫(18 / x(2 + √x)) dx

We can use substitution, u = 2 + √x, du/dx = 1/(2√x), and dx = 2u(√x)du. Substituting these values, we get:

∫(18 / x(2 + √x)) dx = ∫(18 / u^2 - 4) 2u^2 du

= 36 ∫(1 / (u^2 - 4)) du

= 18 ln|u - 2| - 18 ln|u + 2| + C

= 18 ln|2 + √x - 2| - 18 ln|2 + √x + 2| + C

= 18 ln|√x| - 18 ln|(√x + 2)| + C

= 18 ln(√x / (√x + 2)) + C

Therefore, the solution to the integral is 18 ln(√x / (√x + 2)) + C.

To learn more about  integration refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The stationary points are Primal feasibility: g1(x) <= 0, g2(x) <= 0, g3(x) <= 0, and x1, x2 >= 0, Dual feasibility: λ1, λ2, λ3 >= 0, Complementary slackness: λ1g1(x) = 0, λ2g2(x) = 0, λ3*g3(x) = 0, Gradient of Lagrangian: ∇f(x) + λ1∇g1(x) + λ2∇g2(x) + λ3∇g3(x) = 0

The given problem can be expressed as:

minimize f(x) = x1^2 + x2^2

subject to g1(x) = -x1*x2 + 5 <= 0

g2(x) = -x1 <= 0

g3(x) = -x2 <= 0

where x = (x1, x2)

To find the local minimizers of the problem, we can first find the stationary points by setting the gradient of the Lagrangian L(x, λ) = f(x) + λ1g1(x) + λ2g2(x) + λ3*g3(x) equal to zero. Here, λ1, λ2, λ3 are the Lagrange multipliers associated with the constraints.

∇L(x, λ) = [2x1 - λ1x2 - λ2, 2x2 - λ1x1 - λ3] = 0

Solving these equations, we get x1 = x2λ1/2, x2 = x1λ1/2, and λ1 = λ2 = λ3. Substituting these values in the constraint g1(x), we get λ1^2 - 4λ1 + 20/λ1 <= 0.

Solving this inequality, we get 2 <= λ1 <= 2√5.

Using the value of λ1, we can find the corresponding values of x1 and x2.

Case 1: λ1 = 2

In this case, x1 = x2, and x1*x2 = 5, so x1^2 = x2^2 = 5/2. Therefore, the local minimizer is (x1, x2) = (√(5/2), √(5/2)).

Case 2: λ1 = 2√5

In this case, x1 = x2√5, and x1x2 = 5, so x2^3 = 5/√5 = √5. Therefore, the local minimizers are (x1, x2) = (0, √5/∛2) and (x1, x2) = (√5∛2/2, √5/(2∛2)).

To check that the KKT conditions are satisfied, we need to verify that the stationary points found above satisfy the following conditions:

Primal feasibility: g1(x) <= 0, g2(x) <= 0, g3(x) <= 0, and x1, x2 >= 0

Dual feasibility: λ1, λ2, λ3 >= 0

Complementary slackness: λ1g1(x) = 0, λ2g2(x) = 0, λ3*g3(x) = 0

Gradient of Lagrangian: ∇f(x) + λ1∇g1(x) + λ2∇g2(x) + λ3∇g3(x) = 0

It can be verified that all the local minimizers found above satisfy these conditions, and hence are the optimal solutions to the given problem.

Learn more about feasibility here

https://brainly.com/question/14842003

#SPJ11

The total number of possible arrangements of 3 cards from a set of 6 is 6 choose 3, which is 20. To spell "got" with these cards, the child needs to choose the cards for g, o, and t. There is only one way to spell "got" with these cards, so the probability of guessing the correct arrangement is 1/20. This can be simplified to 1/20 or 0.05 as a decimal or 5% as a percentage. Therefore, the probability of the child correctly guessing the arrangement of cards to spell "got" is 1/20.

To know more about probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

Using four subintervals of equal width, we have Δx = (2-1)/4 = 0.25.

The left endpoints of the subintervals are: 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75.

The corresponding function values are:

f(1) = 18 - 1^2 = 17

f(1.25) = 18 - 1.25^2 = 16.4375

f(1.5) = 18 - 1.5^2 = 15.75

f(1.75) = 18 - 1.75^2 = 14.9375

So the lower sum is:

L = f(1)Δx + f(1.25)Δx + f(1.5)Δx + f(1.75)Δx

= (17)(0.25) + (16.4375)(0.25) + (15.75)(0.25) + (14.9375)(0.25)

= 16.28125

Rounding to the nearest hundredth, we get:

L ≈ 16.28

To know more about corresponding function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29754797#

#SPJ11

Answer:

34 PERCENT

Step-by-step explanation:

To describe the stride lengths of ostriches in terms of the mean and standard deviation only, we can use the empirical rule (also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule). According to this rule, for a normal distribution:

- Approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean.

- Approximately 95% of the data falls within two standard deviations of the mean.

- Approximately 99.7% of the data falls within three standard deviations of the mean.

Since the mean stride length of ostriches is 4.5 meters and the standard deviation is 0.75 meters, a stride length between 4.5 and 5.25 meters is within one standard deviation above the mean. Therefore, approximately 34% of the ostriches have stride lengths between 4.5 and 5.25 meters.

To find a similar percentage of emus, we can use the same approach. Since the mean stride length of emus is 3 meters and the standard deviation is 0.5 meters, we need to find the interval that is one standard deviation above the mean. This interval is from 3.5 meters to 2.5 meters, so approximately 34% of the emus have stride lengths between 2.5 and 3.5 meters.

To see this percentage using a graph of the normal curve, we can draw the curve for the distribution of ostrich stride lengths with mean 4.5 meters and standard deviation 0.75 meters. The area under the curve between 4.5 and 5.25 meters represents the percentage of ostriches with stride lengths in that range, which is approximately 34%. Similarly, we can draw the curve for the distribution of emu stride lengths with mean 3 meters and standard deviation 0.5 meters. The area under the curve between 2.5 and 3.5 meters represents the percentage of emus with stride lengths in that range, which is also approximately 34%.