Answer:
Based on the given facts, the correct answer is (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages.
Explanation:
The agreement between the developer and the investor to sell the land was a contract, which was formed when the developer made an offer to purchase the land and the investor accepted it. The fact that the parties did not use attorneys or put the agreement in writing does not necessarily make the agreement unenforceable. However, the agreement does not comply with the Statute of Frauds, which requires certain contracts, including contracts for the sale of land, to be in writing in order to be enforceable.
The payment of $2,500 by the developer to the investor constitutes earnest money, which is a deposit made by a buyer to show good faith and to bind the contract. If the developer breaches the contract, the investor is entitled to keep the earnest money as liquidated damages. However, the investor cannot force the developer to purchase the land or to perform the contract because specific performance is an equitable remedy, and the court will not compel the developer to perform the contract when the contract is unenforceable due to the Statute of Frauds.
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages.
If a restriction imposed by the government is content neutral, then a court will not allow it.True False
It is false that if a restriction imposed by the government is content-neutral, then a court will not allow it.
Content-neutral regulations are those that apply to all expressions without taking into account their message or substance.
Such prohibitions frequently only regulate the place, time, and manner of speech, as opposed to laws that restrict speech based on its content. This distinction is critical in First Amendment challenges because content-based legislation is subject to intense scrutiny, the highest level of judicial review, but content-neutral legislation is only subject to intermediate, or mid-level, assessment.
Because many content-based laws are overturned and many content-neutral laws are upheld by the courts, the distinction frequently has an impact on how a case turns out.
Reviewing courts usually look at whether the government meant to repress expression when it established the law to assess whether the statute is content-based or content-neutral.
To learn more about content-neutral, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30691182
#SPJ4
A homeowner lived next door to a vacant lot owned by another neighbor. From the time the homeowner purchased his own property, he told other people that he owned the vacant lot. The homeowner had an underground dog fence installed under the vacant lot without the neighbor's knowledge. The homeowner also mowed the vacant lot regularly in the summer. When he had landscaping services performed on his own property, the landscapers dug up vegetation beds, which extended three feet into the neighbor's lot. After the statutory period for bringing a trespass action had passed, the homeowner brought an action to quiet title, claiming ownership of the vacant lot.
Which of the following additional facts, if true, would be most helpful to the homeowner's case?
A One of the people that the homeowner often told about owning the vacant lot was the neighbor herself.
B The neighbor occasionally saw the homeowner's dog on the vacant lot, but never demanded that the homeowner keep the dog in the homeowner's yard.
C The vegetation beds continued to exist with the same dimensions, and were regularly maintained by the homeowner, for the entire statutory period.
D When he told people that he owned the vacant lot, the homeowner believed that it was true.
The following additional facts, if true, would be most helpful to the homeowner's case homeowner needs to establish OPEN hostile possession of the property... so she could tell the neighbor about her ownership of the lot.
What constitutes an unfavourable possession example?A person may assert a property right in land that is the property of another under the legal theory known as adverse possession. Continuous use of a private road or driveway or agricultural development on an undeveloped plot of land are typical examples of adverse occupation.
What is the most typical method for transferring real estate between parties?Deed of Warranty: A warranty deed is the most typical document used to transfer property (sometimes called a "grant deed"). A warranty deed specifically guarantees to the new owner that the grantor/seller has good title to the property while transferring ownership.
To Know more about ownership
https://brainly.com/question/14480423
#SPJ1
michels's analysis of the iron law of oligarchy reflected the ideas of which of the following perspectives? multiple choice feminist conflict symbolic interactionist functionalist
Michels's analysis of the iron law of oligarchy reflected the ideas of the conflict perspective.
He argued that organizations are inevitably dominated by a small group of leaders who maintain power through manipulation and control.
Who was Michels, and what was the iron law of oligarchy?Robert Michels was a German-Italian sociologist who lived from 1876 to 1936. His most famous work is "Political Parties," published in 1911, in which he introduced the concept of the "iron law of oligarchy." This idea suggests that all organizations, no matter how democratic they may start out, will eventually develop a small group of leaders who hold power and make decisions on behalf of the rest of the members. Michels believed that this was an inevitable result of the complexity of modern organizations and the need for efficiency and stability.
To know more about Political Parties visit:
brainly.com/question/12401053
#SPJ1
in which of the following cases did the supreme court block states from regulating labor practices, concluding that doing so would violate factory owners' property rights?
Lochner v. New York is the cases did the supreme court block states from regulating labor practices, concluding that doing so would violate factory owners' property rights.
What did the Supreme Court decide in McCulloch v Maryland 1819?In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court determined that Congress had the implied authority to establish the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and that the state of Maryland lacked the authority to tax the Bank.
The Barron ruling successfully stopped many state cases from being heard in federal courts. Additionally, it gave the states carte blanche to ignore the Bill of Rights in their interactions with their constituents, who were forced to rely on state laws and constitutions to defend their rights.
Thus, Lochner v. New York.
For more information about Supreme Court decide in McCulloch v Maryland 1819, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14339452
#SPJ1
What is the role of the Texas Senate in appointments made by the governor?
The Texas Senate confirms the governor's nominees further they can remove nominees from office.
The governor of Texas is head of the state of Texas. The governor is head of the executive and legislative branch of the government and the commander in chief of the military of Texas. Governors were nominated across the state which is confirmed by the senate by a motion of majority further the senate has the right to remove any nomination from such a election on the basis of certain circumstances or situations. The senate can also convict the governor under the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. The senate can prohibit such officials from holding public offices in the future.
Know more about "Texas Senate" visit
brainly.com/question/15191795
#SPJ4
which two elements are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent-based crime?
a. Criminal act and criminal intent are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent-based crime
The physical or exterior component of a crime, such as the act of stealing, assault, or murder, is referred to as the criminal act. The accused must have done something that is regarded as unlawful. Contrarily, criminal intent refers to the psychological component of a crime. When committing a crime, a person must be in this frame of mind or have this mental attitude. Depending on the exact crime, criminal intent may be explicit or inferred and vary.
Crimes with a definite intent or state of mind are known as intent crimes. Crimes with intent include homicide, theft, and fraud. A defendant must have committed unlawful conduct as well as the necessary criminal intent in order to be found guilty of an intent offence. But, criminal intent is not necessary for all crimes. A person may be found guilty of certain crimes even if they did not intend to do them since they are deemed strict liability crimes.
Complete Question:
Which two elements are required to find a defendant guilty of an intent crime?
A) criminal act and criminal intent
B) victim and criminal intent
C) criminal act and proof of gain
D) motive and criminal intent
Read more about Criminal act on:
https://brainly.com/question/3788903
#SPJ4
Who was declared the rightful governor of Georgia in a special election in 1948?
Herman Talmadge was the rightful governor of Georgia in a special election in 1948.
The "three governors issue" in Georgia in 1946–1947, which was sparked by Eugene Talmadge's death as governor–elect, was one of the more peculiar political spectacles in American political history.
Upon Talmadge's passing, his supporters came up with a scheme that let the Georgia legislature choose a governor in January 1947. The newly elected lieutenant governor, Melvin E. Thompson, claimed the position of governor after the General Assembly chose Talmadge's son Herman Talmadge as governor.
Also, the previous governor, Ellis Arnall, refused to step down. Ultimately, the dispute was resolved by the Georgia Supreme Court.
The Georgia Supreme Court concluded in March 1947 that Melvin E. Thompson was the legitimate acting governor of the state because he was the lieutenant governor-elect and ran for re-election.
To know more about Herman Talmadge, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15003731
#SPJ4
what part of the constitution includes the equal protection clause and was used to decide the case brown v. board of education?
The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution contains the Equal Protection Clause, which was used in the decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This clause provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause was central to the landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. The Court held that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision paved the way for the desegregation of public schools and became a catalyst for the broader civil rights movement in the United States.
learn more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
the bureaucracy is sometimes referred to as the ""fourth branch"" of the federal government. why?
The bureaucracy is sometimes referred to as the "fourth branch" of the federal government because it plays an important role in the implementation and administration of government policy and programs, alongside the three branches of government outlined in the U.S.
Constitution: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
The bureaucracy, which includes the various federal agencies, departments, and commissions, is responsible for carrying out the day-to-day operations of the federal government. This includes implementing laws and policies enacted by Congress, administering programs such as Social Security and Medicare, and enforcing regulations to protect public health, safety, and the environment.
Although the bureaucracy is technically part of the executive branch, it operates independently of the President and Congress to a large extent, with career civil servants and agency heads making decisions and carrying out programs according to established rules and procedures. As such, it is sometimes referred to as a "fourth branch" of government, as it has significant power and influence over public policy and administration.
To know more about bureaucracy here
https://brainly.com/question/30696747
#SPJ4
1. how is the ratignolle marriage a contrast to the pontellier marriage?
In Kate Chopin's novel "The Awakening," the Ratignolle marriage is presented as a contrast to the Pontellier marriage in several ways:
Role of the HusbandGender RolesThe Ratignolle marriage is shown as a contrast to the Pontellier marriage in numerous ways in Kate Chopin's work "The Awakening":
The Husband's Role: Edna's husband, Leonce Pontellier, is revealed to be more engaged in business and social activities than in his wife and family. In contrast, Adele's husband, Alcee Ratignolle, is presented as being highly concerned in his family life as well as his wife's emotional and physical well-being.
Gender Roles: The Pontellier marriage follows traditional gender norms, with Leonce as the dominant spouse and Edna expected to fulfil her role as a faithful wife and mother. In contrast, the Ratignolle marriage is portrayed as more egalitarian, with Alcee and Adele cooperating as equal partners to produce a happy and successful marriage.
For such more question on Ratignolle :
https://brainly.com/question/19871938
#SPJ4
The state took possession of Oliver's farm when he passed away because he did not have a will or any heirs. What right did the state exercise?
a. condemnation
b. eminent domain
c. escheat
d. inverse condemnation
The state took possession of Oliver's farm when he passed away because he did not have a will or any heirs. Here the state exercised the power of escheat. The correct option is C.
The real estate of a person who passes away without heirs is given to the state or the crown under the common law doctrine of escheat. It makes sure that property does not remain unclaimed and in "limbo."
It first applied to a variety of circumstances in which a legal interest in land was eliminated by operation of law, reverting to the immediately superior feudal lord as the new owner.
Escheat is a concept that is embodied in Section 29. According to the doctrine of escheat, if a person passes away intestate and does not leave behind an eligible heir, their property passes to the government.
To know more about law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
politics a) is basically the same thing as government. b) is generally free of conflict. c) is the process that determines what government does. d) does not affect most people daily.
Politics is the process that determines what government does. Thus, option C is correct.
Politics is defined as the collection of activities involved with group decision-making or other types of power interactions among individuals. Politics is the process through which the government decides what to do.
Power is defined in social science and politics as the social creation of an impact that influences the capacities, actions, beliefs, or behavior of actors. Political action may be useful in and of itself since it socializes and educates citizens, and popular involvement can put strong elites in check.
Politics contributes to the development of decent citizens and leaders. It teaches about the state's constitution, laws, and responsibilities.
Learn more about the politics, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
Politics is the process by which the actions of the government are decided. Option C is right as a result.
The term "politics" refers to a variety of activities including group decision-making or other forms of power dynamics. The method by which the government makes decisions is called politics.
In social science and politics, power is described as the social development of an impact that affects actors' abilities, actions, beliefs, or behavior. Political action may be beneficial in and of itself since it educates and socializes the populace and can restrain powerful elites.
Politics aids in the growth of moral citizens and leaders. It imparts knowledge of the state's constitution, laws, and obligations.
To learn more about politics, refer to:
brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
what was the hypothesis of the stanford prison experiment
The hypothesis of the Stanford prison experiment was that the prisoners and guards were self-selecting.
Zimbardo and his team set out to examine the claim that the main driver of abusive conduct in jail is the intrinsic personality features of both prisoners and guards. The hypothesis was based on self-selecting which means that they were not restricted to any actions and were free to perform whatever they wanted.
A two-week jail simulation was advertised when participants were being sought out. It was assumed that participants who were given the role of a guard would act in a manner consistent with the role, and those who were given the role of a prisoner would act in that capacity.
The exchanges between the guards and the convicts were unrestricted, yet they were unfriendly or even demeaning.
While the convicts were meek and despondent, the guards started acting aggressively and abusive towards them.
To know more about Stanford prison experiment, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/3838365
#SPJ4
the 2012 fiscal cliff was avoided by the passage of ______.
The 2012 fiscal cliff was avoided by the passage of the American taxpayer relief act of 2012.
The government of United States 2012 fiscal cliff refers to the combined effect of numerous previously-enacted laws that came into effect altogether in January 2013, by increasing taxes and decreasing spending. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) was enacted and passed by the United States Congress on January 1, 2013, and was signed by the president of United State Barack Obama on January 2, 2013 . The act was passed as a approach to combine spending cuts and hiking taxes and to prevent most of the sunsetting tax from expiring. The act permanently fixed the Alternative Minimum Taxes.
Know more about "fiscal cliff" visit
brainly.com/question/28804281
#SPJ4
Who was the naacp lawyer for Brown v. Board of Education?
Jack Greenberg was the lawyer, also the first white attorney, for Brown v. Board of Education.
The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in the favor of Brown v. Board of Education was basically the product of the hard work as well as the diligence of the best attorneys from the nation which included Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Robert Carter, Oliver Hill, Spottswood Robinson, Louis Redding, Charles and John Scott, Harold R. Boulware, James Nabrit, as well as George E.C. Hayes.
These LDF lawyers were further assisted by a number of brain trust of legal scholars. These legal minds were the ones who conceived, developed as well as executed the plan to dismantle the notion of “separate but equal” in the American life.
To know more about Brown v. Board of Education
https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ4
Which courts decide more than 95 percent of the nation’s legal cases?
answer choices
State courts
Supreme court
Small claims court
District courts
The use of so-called "passive consent" processes allow eligible students to opt out of data disclosure. This is generally used for _____.
Students who meet the criteria might choose not to have their data disclosed by using so-called "passive consent" procedures. Typically, this is utilised for student's directory information.
In other words, the study team must give a subject the information necessary for consent, but they are not obligated to get the subject's signature on the informed consent form.
The full informed consent procedure is providing a subject with sufficient information about the study, giving them enough time to consider all of their alternatives, answering their questions, making sure they understand this information, and getting their free consent.
Read more about data disclosure at
https://brainly.com/question/30328376
#SPJ4
which amendment(s) address and protect the rights of women?part 3 ap gov
The 14th Amendment address and protect the rights of women. In 1937, the argument that restricting the freedom of contract by establishing minimum pay for women and children violates due process was finally abandoned.
The 14th Amendment states that all people who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and who were born or naturalized there are citizens of both the nation and the state in which they currently reside. No State shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no State shall rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection under the law.
The 14th Amendment disregarded such supporting evidence, declared it was unable to see any rational connection between the statute and the legitimate goals of health or safety, and condemned the statute as an arbitrary restriction on the right to contract in order to invalidate comparable legislation, such as laws establishing minimum wages for women and children.
Even in the Lochner era, the due process clause was interpreted to allow the States to establish maximum hours regulations that applied to female employees and those in particular professions deemed to be physically demanding or otherwise deserving of special protection.
To learn more about the 14th Amendment, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/29793577
#SPJ4
The Bill of Rights: What Does it Say?
Ten of the first amendments to the Constitution together make up the Bill of Rights. Regarding their government, it explains how Americans are entitled to certain fundamental rights.
The rights to freedom of expression, of the press, and of religion are ensured. Any jurisdiction not granted to the federal government is reserved for the people or the States, and it lays out guidelines for the administration of justice in conformity with the law. The Constitution further states that "the mention of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be regarded as a rejection or denigration of those preserved by the people." The First Amendment guarantees a number of rights, including the freedom to petition the government, form or join a group for a protest or other purpose, and the freedom to express one's political views.
Learn more about fundamental here:
https://brainly.com/question/28941950
#SPJ4
How many African Americans served in the Senate during the entire twentieth century?
a. eight
b. ten
c. two
d. three
Eight African Americans served in the Senate during the entire twentieth century.
The correct option is (a).
Eleven Black Americans have held elected or appointed positions in the Senate. During the nineteenth and twentieth century, there were two each.
Black individuals, a definite noun Black people with African heritage who reside in the United States and are connected to those who were born in Africa are known as African-Americans. African-Americans currently make approximately 12% of the population.
Regardless of whether they are a part of or distinct from mainstream culture, "African-American culture," also referred to as "Black-American culture," refers to the cultural contributions made by African Americans to American society.
Three of the eight African Americans who have served in the Senate since the American Civil Rights Movement for African Americans have represented Illinois' Class 3 seat, including Barack Obama, who later became president of the country. As a result, Illinois now has the highest number of Black Americans serving as senators.
Therefore, the correct answer will be option (a)
To know more about African
https://brainly.com/question/13734659
#SPJ4
which of the following is not an example of public law? a. administrative law b. criminal law c. constitutional law d. contract law
what theory can explain why some drug dealers experience property victimization?
The theory some drug dealers experience property was victimization, considered as, lifestyle theory.
What is experience?As the word experience is referring as, the experience refers to intended psychological feature in general, and perceptual experience in particular, as well as the practical knowledge and acquaintance produced by these intended processes.
As, the lifestyle theory is considered, as people may become the unfortunate person of law-breaking because of their lifestyles and choices. For example, someone with a speculation or substance dependence could be as an “easy victim” by a con creative person.
Therefore, As a result, the lifestyle theory was the dealers experience property victimization.
Learn more about the experience here:
https://brainly.com/question/11256472
#SPJ1
the u.s. government says a surveillance balloon from what country was found flying across the united states this year 2023 and was later shot down?
Uni Soviet
China
Japan
South Korea
The U.S. government says a surveillance balloon from China country was found flying across the united states this week and was later shot down.
It included collecting pod equipment, including cutting-edge technology that could capture communications signals and other sensitive information, positioned on the metal truss hanging below the balloon, according to government sources.
According to military officials, there was a disproportionate risk that people might be injured by debris when the balloon was over land. An F-22 Raptor from Virginia's 1st Fighter Wing's Langley Air Force Base launched one AIM-9X Sidewinder missile at the balloon.
The purported Chinese surveillance balloon is shot down in the waters off Surfside Beach, South Carolina.
To learn more about surveillance https://brainly.com/question/15136673
#SPJ4
no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The 14th amendment provides no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states.
According to the 14th Amendment, No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. According to this amendment no state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law and nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The Amendment 14 passed by the Senate on June 8, 1866 and ratified two years later on July 9, 1868. The Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship to all persons who born or naturalized in the United States including formerly enslaved people and provided all citizens with equal protection under the laws.
To learn more about 14th amendment
https://brainly.com/question/7570923
#SPJ4
The correct question is,
which amendment provides no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws ?
which is not an accurate statement regarding the crime of assault?
Answer:
It is necessary for the victim to wait until he or she has been physically assaulted before acting in self-defense
Explanation:
That is definately an inaccurate statement.
You didn't provide options, so I hope this helps
What did the investigations into the Michael Brown shooting conclude?
The grand jury declined to indict Wilson on any charges, while the St. Louis County prosecutor's office found insufficient evidence to bring charges against him.
The investigations into the shooting of Michael Brown, an 18-year-old black man, by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, reached different conclusions depending on the agency conducting the investigation. The initial investigation by the Ferguson Police Department concluded that Officer Darren Wilson, who shot Brown, acted in self-defense and that the shooting was justified. However, this conclusion was widely criticized by activists and civil rights groups who argued that it was biased and incomplete. Subsequent investigations by the St. Louis County prosecutor's office, the U.S. Department of Justice, and a grand jury reached different conclusions. The grand jury declined to indict Wilson on any charges, while the St. Louis County prosecutor's office found insufficient evidence to bring charges against him. However, the U.S. Department of Justice conducted a separate investigation and released a report in 2015 that found a pattern of racially biased policing by the Ferguson Police Department and other systemic issues in the city's criminal justice system. The report also found no evidence to contradict Wilson's claim that he acted in self-defense during the encounter with Brown. Overall, the investigations into the Michael Brown shooting were controversial and exposed ongoing concerns about racial bias and police violence in the United States.
To know more about the grand jury, click here: https://brainly.com/question/18726345
#SPJ4
what is it called when two countries get as close to possible to going to war before stopping?
When two countries get as close to possible to going to war before stopping, it is called preventive diplomacy.
The United Nations has been enthralled by the concept of preventive diplomacy ever since Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld introduced it over 50 years ago.
Article 99 of the United Nations Charter, which gives the Secretary-General the authority to alert the Security Council of dangers to international peace and security, foreshadowed preventive diplomacy.
Any actions taken to prevent conflicts from starting or spreading, as well as to prevent current disputes from growing into hostilities, are considered to be part of preventive diplomacy.
With a perspective that unifies the three pillars of the United Nations—peace and security, human rights, and inclusive development—prevention targets the core causes of conflict.
To know more about preventive diplomacy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10429812
#SPJ4
which branch power is being checked create and pass legislation
The legislative branch is the branch that has the power to check, create and pass a legislation.
The legislative branch may be referred to or taken into consideration as the branch that deals with the legal structuring and lawful observation in the society that falls under its jurisdiction. In order to maintain the legal formalities, the legislative branch also has the powers to make, amend, change, or discard the laws for creating and passing legislations within the constitution. Thus, the powers of legislative branch are given.
Learn more about the legislative branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/11883152
#SPJ4
complete question
Which branch's power is being checked to create and pass a legislation?
Give an example of current policy where we see marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix!
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a prominent example of marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix.
While providing federal cash to support private health insurance exchanges and provide other healthcare-related protections, the ACA compels states to extend Medicaid eligibility.
States can choose to implement the ACA on their own, but if they do not, the federal government will take over and do so. But, states are given significant latitude in how they carry out specific provisions of the legislation, such as how they run their Medicaid programmes and establish their insurance exchanges.
Under this form of federalism, states have some flexibility over how they carry out the law while federal authorities make sure that it is adhered to, creating the ideal balance between state and federal authority.
To learn more about legislation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ4
what is th emost important part of a judicial decision rea 411
The judicial system contributes to the creation of laws. The meaning, character, and reach of the laws passed by the legislature are really determined by the court rulings. As these interpretations define the laws, the judiciary's understanding of the law amounts to lawmaking.
By defining a crucial judicial decision as one that "establishes a legal rule or principle that is employed to resolve future cases, thereby distinguishing itself from judgments doomed to spend eternity on the ash heap of legal history," they shorthanded the term importance to mean "having precedential value."
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution expressly mandates.
To know more about judiciary, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14328711
#SPJ4
