according to erin meyer, which country is more consensual in its approach to decision-making than all the others?

Both statements 1 and 2 are true regarding the Ottoman Empire.

1. The empire spanned Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East. The Ottoman Empire was a vast empire that existed from the 14th century until the early 20th century. At its height, it encompassed territories in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, including parts of modern-day Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, Egypt, Iraq, and many others.

2. The empire influenced the emerging trade routes for people, goods, and money that spanned from England to China. The Ottoman Empire played a significant role in shaping the trade routes of the time. It controlled key strategic locations, such as the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits, which connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Black Sea and facilitated trade between Europe and Asia. The empire's influence impacted the Silk Road and the emerging trade networks that spanned from Europe to Asia, facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures.

However, statement 3 is incorrect:

3. The empire did not drive the search for sea routes to Asia or the expeditions that discovered the Americas. The Ottoman Empire was not directly involved in the Age of Exploration or the European voyages of discovery that led to the discovery of the Americas. These expeditions were primarily driven by European powers, such as Spain, Portugal, and later England, seeking new sea routes to Asia and expanding their colonial ambitions.

To learn more about the Ottoman Empire visit

brainly.com/question/21258779

#SPJ11

Following the John Brown's 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry, many Southerners assumed that it was a sign of a widespread Northern conspiracy against slavery.

Brown's violent attempt to incite a slave uprising deeply alarmed the South, reinforcing their belief that Northern abolitionists were actively plotting to undermine their way of life.

Southerners saw the raid as evidence of Northern aggression and a threat to their social and economic system based on slavery. The event further deepened sectional tensions and contributed to the growing divide between the North and the South, ultimately leading to the outbreak of the American Civil War.

To learn more about   Northern conspiracy  click here: brainly.com/question/31298690

#SPJ11

The two regions that experienced significant conflict during the early 19th century were North America and Latin America.

North America witnessed the War of 1812, a military confrontation between the United States and Britain. In contrast, Latin America was characterized by revolts against Spanish colonial rule.

Throughout the first quarter of the 19th century, North America experienced significant tension between the United States and Britain, culminating in the War of 1812. The war was fought over a range of issues, including territorial disputes, trade restrictions, and impressment of American sailors by the British Navy. Although the conflict ended in a stalemate, it had far-reaching consequences. For instance, it secured American independence, strengthened nationalism, and heightened military capabilities.

In contrast, Latin America witnessed a series of revolutionary movements that aimed to overthrow Spanish colonial rule. These revolts were sparked by a range of factors, including economic exploitation, political repression, and ideological differences. The most notable of these movements were the Haitian Revolution, the Mexican War of Independence, and the Venezuelan War of Independence. Although they varied in scope and outcome, they collectively challenged Spanish imperialism and contributed to the emergence of independent republics across the region.

While conflict occurred in other regions around the world during the early 19th century, it was the conflict in North America and Latin America that had the most significant geopolitical impact. Together, they shaped the political, economic, and social direction of the Americas and influenced global affairs for years to come.

To learn more about war of 1812 click brainly.com/question/13899658

#SPJ11

In a holistic Native American view of health, humans are considered a part of the natural world (option d) and their well-being is connected to the health of the environment.

This includes the plants, animals, water, and air around them. By living in harmony with the natural world, Native Americans believed they could maintain good health and prevent illness.

This view also recognizes the importance of spirituality and community in promoting overall wellness.

Therefore, it is important to maintain a balance between physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual health to achieve optimal well-being.

In summary, the well-being of humans in a Native American view of health is deeply connected to the natural world.

For more such questions on environment, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/721753

#SPJ11

As described in the second paragraph, the arguments made by the supporters of the opium trade were most similar to the arguments made in the early nineteenth century by supporters(one who appeals in favor ) of the continued use of slavery.

Both groups argued that their respective trades were essential to the economy and that abolition would lead to economic ruin. They also justified their practices by claiming that they were providing a service to those who relied on their products, whether it was the slave owners who needed labor or the Chinese who needed opium for medicinal purposes. However, both trades had severe moral and ethical implications that eventually led to their abolition.

Hence, Based on your question, the arguments made by supporters of the opium trade in the second paragraph were most similar to the arguments made in the early nineteenth century by supporters of the continued use of slavery. Both groups justified their positions based on economic benefits, despite the negative social and moral implications.

To know more about appeals  visit

https://brainly.com/question/19242877

#SPJ11