According to Video Game Voters.org, 38% of all games sold in the U.S. would be purchased by women. Explain why is this a joint event?

Answer:

i think you could......

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

slope is always the coeffcient* the number beside the variable

Answer:

a) True

b) True

C) false

Step-by-step explanation:

just a guess..... Merry Christmas

so that's

$300,000

*30*4/100

$36,000

2

prob. = total probs./no of probs

=0.35+0.45/2

=0.575

sweetie please verify tou answer am not 100% sure but that how it should be done

please I need brainliest thanks

Answer:

The actual selling price is $58.04 and the markdown is $6.96

Hope this helps :)

Proof (reasons are given in brackets):

Consider [tex]\triangle ABC[/tex], [tex]\triangle EDC[/tex]:

[tex]\overline B \overline C = \overline D \overline C[/tex] (given)

[tex]\angle BCA = \angle DCE[/tex] (vertically opposite angles are equal)

[tex]\overline A \overline C = \overline E \overline C[/tex] (given)

[tex]\therefore \triangle ABC \cong \triangle EDC[/tex] (SAS)

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

the answer is (2, 45) geometric

Answer: Katie, Josie, Ramona, Teri

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.Katie,ramona,josie,Katie.2.katie,josie,romona,teri 3.teri,Ramona,josie,katie 4.Ramona,teri,katie,josie

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.6395 ; 0.9657 ; 0.7333

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Mean (m) = 10.1

Standard deviation (s) = 2.8

Obtain the following probabilities :

a) less than 10 minutes

P(x < 10)

Z = (x - m) / s

Z = (10 - 10.1) / 2.8

Z = 0.1 / 2.8

Z = 0.0357142

P(Z < 0.357) = 0.6395 ( Z probability calculator)

(b) longer than 5 minutes

P(x > 5)

Z = (x - m) / s

Z = (5 - 10.1) / 2.8

Z = −1.821428

P(Z < - 1.821) = 0.9657 ( Z probability calculator)

(c) between 8 and 15 minutes

P(8 < x < 15)

P(x < 8)

Z = (x - m) / s

Z = (8 - 10.1) / 2.8

Z = − 0.75

P(Z < - 0.75) = 0.22663 ( Z probability calculator)

P(x < 15)

Z = (x - m) / s

Z = (15 - 10.1) / 2.8

Z = 1.75

P(Z < 1.75) = 0.95994 ( Z probability calculator)

P(Z < 1.75) - P(Z < - 0.75)

0.95994 - 0.22663 = 0.7333

The expression (124 × 9) × (1/10 × 1/10) is NOT equivalent to 1.24 × 0.9. which is the correct answer would be an option (D).

Expressions are defined as mathematical statements that have a minimum of two terms containing variables or numbers.

A. (124 × 90) × (1/100 × 1/100) simplifies to 1.24 × 0.9 because 124 × 90 = 11160 and 1/100 × 1/100 = 1/10000, so the expression is equivalent to (11160/10000) × 0.9 = 1.24 × 0.9.

Similarly, expressions B and C can be rearranged as (9 × 1/10) × (0.124 × 10), which is also equivalent to 1.24 × 0.9.

B. (124 × 9) × (1/100 × 1/10) simplifies to 1.24 × 0.9 because 124 × 9 = 1116 and 1/100 × 1/10 = 1/1000, so the expression is equivalent to (1116/1000) × 0.9 = 1.24 × 0.9.

C. (0.124 × 9) × (10 × 1/10) also simplifies to 1.24 × 0.9 because 0.124 × 9 = 1.116 and 10 × 1/10 = 1, so the expression is equivalent to (1.116/1) × 0.9 = 1.24 × 0.9.

However, expression D cannot be rearranged to the form 1.24 × 0.9 because it contains the factors 124 and 90, which are not equivalent to 1.24 and 0.9, respectively.

Therefore, expression D is not equivalent to 1.24 × 0.9.

Learn more about the expression here :

brainly.com/question/21751419

#SPJ2

Answer:

A dilation

Step-by-step explanation:

i

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a. 35 greater than or equal to 14 + x

   35 - 14 = 21

   x = $21

b. If the shirt is 30% off it would cost $9.80

   14 x 0.3 = 4.2

   14 - 4.2 = 9.8

   35 is greater than or equal to 9.80 + x

   35 - 9.8 = 25.2

   x = $25.20

   This changes the inequality by making x greater than it was in part a

c. Yes, you do have enough money to buy the shirt that is on sale and a pair of pants. x is the amount that you have left to spend after you buy the shirt that is on sale. 25.20 is greater than the cost of the pants.

Answer: x + 16y

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 4 to x+ 2y

4x + 8y - 3x + 8y (open the bracket)

x + 16y

Answer:

x+16y

Step-by-step explanation:

4(x+2y)-(3x-8y)

we open the brackets and the sign of the second bracket changes

4x+8y-3x+8y

we group x's and y's

x+16y

Step-by-step explanation:

thats the ans okay......

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 0.13008 < 1.96 at 0.10 level of significance

null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(I):-

Given surveyed two random samples of 390 men and 360 women who were tested

first sample proportion

                    [tex]p_{1} = \frac{360}{390} = 0.9230[/tex]

second sample proportion

                  [tex]p_{2} = \frac{47}{52} = 0.9038[/tex]

Step(ii):-

Null hypothesis : H₀ : There is no difference  proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

Alternative Hypothesis:-

There is difference between proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

[tex]Z = \frac{p_{1}- p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } } }[/tex]

where

          [tex]P = \frac{n_{1}p_{1} +n_{2} p_{2} }{n_{1}+n_{2} }[/tex]

         P =  0.920

[tex]Z= \frac{0.9230-0.9038}{\sqrt{0.920 X0.08(\frac{1}{390}+\frac{1}{52} } )}[/tex]

Test statistic Z =  0.13008

Level of significance = 0.10

The critical value Z₀.₁₀ = 1.645

Test statistic Z=0.13008 < 1.645 at 0.1 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women







Answer:

x=9

Step-by-step explanation:

4(x-3)-8=16

1. Distribute

(4x) - (4*3) - 8 =16

4x-12-8=16

Combine the 12 and the 8

4x-20=16

Add 20 to both sides

4x-20+20=16+20

4x=36

Divide by 4.

x=9

Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D

Answer:

B) x = -2 or x = 3/5

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

5x² + 7x = 6

Step 2: Solve for x

Answer:

1. The journey will use 15.52 liters of petrol.

2. The approximate cost of petrol to hotel will be 2155.73 pence

3. The whole journey will take 3.36 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Distance of hotel from house = 163 miles

Distance covered by per liter = 10.5 miles

1/ The Hotel is 163 miles from your house.your car travels 10.5 miles for every litre of petrol. Work out approximately how many litres of petrol the journey will use.

Petrol used for total distance = [tex]\frac{Total\ distance}{Distance\ per\ liter}[/tex]

Petrol used for total distance = [tex]\frac{163}{10.5}=15.52\ liters[/tex]

The journey will use 15.52 liters of petrol.

2/The price of petrol is 138.9 pence per litre Work out the approximate cost for the petrol to the hotel .

Cost of per liter petrol = 138.9 pence

Cost for petrol to hotel = Petrol used for journey * Price per liter

Cost of petrol = 138.9 * 15.52 = 2155.73 pence

The approximate cost of petrol to hotel will be 2155.73 pence

3/ you expect to travel 50 miles in each hour of a jurney how long the whole journey should take.

Distance covered per hour = 50 miles

Time taken in whole journey = [tex]\frac{total\ distance}{distance\ per\ hour}[/tex]

Time taken in whole journey = [tex]\frac{168}{50}[/tex]

Time taken in whole journey = 3.36 hours

The whole journey will take 3.36 hours

Hence,

1. The journey will use 15.52 liters of petrol.

2. The approximate cost of petrol to hotel will be 2155.73 pence

3. The whole journey will take 3.36 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

3 - a/7 = -2

a/7 = 5

Therefore a = 35.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

you do 0.74 + 0.18 and then subtract 0.8

Answer:

a = 0

b = 8

c = 53

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Equality Properties

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

8r + 62 - 7 = 2

Step 2: Rewrite

Step 3: Identify Variables

a = 0

b = 8

c = 53

Answer:

2.4 kg/week

Step-by-step explanation:

(48 kg)/(20 weeks) = 2.4 kg/week

Complete Question

Leicester City Fanstore (LCF) will be selling the "new season jersey" for the 2018-2019 season. The regular price of the jersey is $80. Each jersey costs $40. Leftover jerseys will be sold at the end of the season (or later) at $30. Since jerseys are produced in China and lead time is long, Puma wants LCF to decide the quantity right now (December 2017).

a. After some analysis using historic data, LCF expects that the demand will follow a Normal distribution with a mean 40,000 and a standard deviation of 8,000 due to uncertainty in team performance. How many jerseys should LCF order?

b. If a customer cannot buy the jersey from LCF (in the case of a stock-out), they may leave the store disappointed and use other channels (such as Puma stores or puma.com) in future. LCF thinks that the lost customer goodwill is around $10. Should LCF change their decision in part (a)? If yes, please state the number of jerseys LCF should order.

c. Please state whether the following statement is always true, and give a brief explanation. If [tex]C_o =C_i[/tex], the news vendor solution is the mean.

Answer:

a

   [tex]N = 46728[/tex]

b

  [tex]n = 47728[/tex]

c

  Yes it is always true  

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The regular price of the jersey is  [tex]P_r = \$ 80[/tex]

    The cost of producing a jersey is [tex]C= \$ 40[/tex]

  The left-over price of the jersey is [tex]P_o = $ 30[/tex]

   The mean is  [tex]\mu = 40000[/tex]

   The standard deviation is [tex]\sigma = 8000[/tex]

   The cost of lost customer goodwill is [tex]C_g = \$ 10[/tex]

Generally the fund that LCF will loss for one jersey if they order for too many  jersey (i.e more than they need )is mathematically represented  

           [tex]C_o = P_o - C[/tex]

=>        [tex]C_o = 40 - 30[/tex]

=>        [tex]C_o = \$ 10[/tex]

Generally the fund that LCF will loss for one jersey if they order lesser amount  jersey (i.e less than they need )is mathematically represented  

           [tex]C_i = P_r - C[/tex]

=>        [tex]C_i = 80 - 40[/tex]

=>        [tex]C_i = \$ 40[/tex]

Generally the critical ratio is mathematically represented as

             [tex]Z = \frac{C_i }{ C_i + C_o}[/tex]

=>           [tex]Z = \frac{40}{ 40 + 10}[/tex]

=>           [tex]Z = 0.8[/tex]

Generally the critical value of  [tex]Z = 0.8[/tex] to the right of the normal curve is

         [tex]z = 0.841[/tex]

Generally the optimal quantity of jersey to order is mathematically represented as

             [tex]N = \mu * [z * \sigma][/tex]

=>          [tex]N = 40000 * [0.841 * 8000][/tex]

=>          [tex]N = 46728[/tex]

Considering question b

  Generally considering the factor of customer goodwill  the fund that LCF will loss for one jersey if they order lesser amount  jersey (i.e less than they need )is mathematically represented  as

           [tex]C_k = C_i + C_g[/tex]

=>        [tex]C_k = 40 + 10[/tex]

=>        [tex]C_k = \$ 50[/tex]

Now   the critical ratio is mathematically represented as

             [tex]Z = \frac{C_k }{ C_k + C_o}[/tex]

=>           [tex]Z = \frac{50}{ 50 + 10}[/tex]

=>           [tex]Z = 0.833[/tex]

Generally the critical value of  [tex]Z = 0.833[/tex] to the right of the normal curve is

         [tex]z = 0.966[/tex]

Generally the optimal quantity of jersey to order is mathematically represented as

             [tex]n = \mu * [z * \sigma][/tex]

=>          [tex]n = 40000 * [0.966 * 8000][/tex]

=>          [tex]n = 47728[/tex]

Considering question c

    When [tex]C_o =C_i[/tex] then

The critical ratio is mathematically represented as

             [tex]Z = \frac{C_k }{ C_k + C_k}[/tex]

=>           [tex]Z = \frac{1}{ 2}[/tex]

=>           [tex]Z = 0.5[/tex]          

Generally the critical value of  [tex]Z = 0.5[/tex] to the right of the normal curve is

         [tex]z = 0[/tex]

So

The optimal quantity of jersey to order is mathematically represented as

             [tex]n = \mu * [z * \sigma][/tex]

=>          [tex]n = 40000 * [0* 8000][/tex]

=>          [tex]n = 40000 = \mu[/tex]

Hence the statement in c is true        

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  39

Step-by-step explanation:

Put 5 where x is and do the arithmetic.

  f(5) = (5+1)^2 +3 = 6^2 +3 = 36 +3

  f(5) = 39