an online furniture store sells chairs for $50 each and tables for $250 each. every day, the store can ship a maximum of 28 pieces of furniture and must sell a minimum of $2200 worth of chairs and tables. if 18 chairs were sold, determine the maximum number of tables that the store could sell that would meet the requirements. if there are no possible solutions, submit an empty answer.

The predicted income increases by $2,500, holding all other variables constant.

To interpret a regression coefficient based on standardized data using unstandardized units, you need to use the formula for converting standardized coefficients to unstandardized coefficients:

B(unstandardized) = B(standardized) * (SDY/SDX)

where B(unstandardized) is the unstandardized coefficient, B(standardized) is the standardized coefficient, SDY is the standard deviation of the dependent variable, and SDX is the standard deviation of the independent variable.

Once you have calculated the unstandardized coefficient, you can interpret it using the units of the original variables. For example, if you are predicting income (in dollars) based on education level (measured in years of schooling), and the regression coefficient for education level is 0.5 (standardized), and the mean income is $50,000 and the standard deviation is $10,000, and the mean education level is 12 years and the standard deviation is 2 years, then the unstandardized coefficient is:

B(unstandardized) = 0.5 * (10,000/2) = 2,500

This means that for every additional year of education, the predicted income increases by $2,500, holding all other variables constant.

Learn more about income here

https://brainly.com/question/30157678

#SPJ11

The accuracy of a digital caliper reading is typically about 0.001 inches. The accuracy of a digital caliper reading refers to the smallest increment that can be measured with reasonable certainty.

This accuracy is typically expressed in terms of the smallest unit of measurement that the caliper can read. In this case, we are given four options: 0.01 inches, 0.001 inches, 0.0003 inches, and 0.1 inches.

Of the four options, the most precise measurement is 0.0003 inches, which is option C. This means that the caliper can read measurements in increments of 0.0003 inches, which is equivalent to 0.000762 centimeters or 0.00762 millimeters.

It is important to note, however, that the accuracy of a digital caliper reading depends not only on the smallest increment that can be measured, but also on the resolution of the display. For example, a caliper that can measure to 0.0001 inches but has a display that only shows measurements to 0.001 inches is not as accurate as a caliper that can measure to 0.001 inches with a display that shows measurements to 0.0001 inches.

In addition, the accuracy of a digital caliper reading can be affected by a number of other factors, including the quality of the caliper, the skill of the user, and the conditions under which the measurement is taken. For example, if the caliper is not calibrated properly or if the user applies too much or too little pressure when taking a measurement, the reading may not be accurate.

In general, it is important to choose a digital caliper with an appropriate level of accuracy for the task at hand. For most applications, a caliper with an accuracy of 0.001 inches or better is sufficient. However, for more precise measurements, a caliper with an accuracy of 0.0001 inches or better may be required.

Learn more about accuracy here

https://brainly.com/question/14523612

#SPJ11

If Mean is 90 minutes and a standard deviation of 13. The cutoff time for a runner to finish in the 25% of the runners is: 81.238 minutes.

We can calculate the z-score using the formula:

z = (x - mean) / standard deviation

Where:

mean = 90 minutes

standard deviation=  13.

We want to find the cutoff time for the 25th percentile, which corresponds to a z-score of -0.674.

Using the formula for z-score we can rearrange it to solve for x:

x = mean + (z * standard deviation)

Substitute

x = 90 + (-0.674 * 13)

x = 90 - 8.762

x ≈ 81.238

Therefore, the cutoff time is 81.238 minutes.

Learn more about cutoff time here:https://brainly.com/question/28522692

#SPJ9

When the time constant is 1 hour, the building's interior temperature will range from a minimum of 16.3°C to a maximum of 31.7°C.

If the time constant is increased to 5 hours, the temperature range shifts to a minimum of 19.1°C and a maximum of 28.9°C.

Let's start with the lowest temperature. When the outside temperature is at its minimum of 13°C, the temperature inside the building will also be at its minimum, assuming that the building has had enough time to reach thermal equilibrium.

Using the formula for the time constant, we can calculate the fraction of the difference between the outside temperature and the initial temperature that corresponds to 63.2%, according to the exponential term,

[tex]e^{-t/\iota}[/tex] = 0.632

where t is the time elapsed since the outside temperature started to rise. Solving for t, we get:

t = τ * ln(1/0.632) = 0.693 * τ

For a time constant of 2 hours, this gives us:

t = 0.693 * 2 = 1.386 hours

This means that the lowest temperature inside the building occurs about 1.4 hours after the outside temperature starts to rise. At this point, the temperature inside the building will be given by:

Tin = Tout + (To - Tout) * [tex]e^{-t/\iota}[/tex]

where To is the initial temperature inside the building, which we are assuming has died off. Plugging in the values, we get:

Tin = 13 + (To - 13) * [tex]e^{-1.386/2}[/tex]

Tin = 13 + (To - 13) * 0.359

Solving for the lowest temperature inside the building, we get:

Tin = 13 + 0.359To - 4.667

Tin = 0.359To + 8.0

When the time constant of a building is 1 hour, the indoor temperature will range from a minimum of 16.3°C to a maximum of 31.7°C. On the other hand, when the time constant is 5 hours, the indoor temperature will vary between 19.1°C and 28.9°C, with a higher minimum and a lower maximum than the previous case.

To know more about exponential form here

https://brainly.com/question/28200739

#SPJ4

The first five terms of the sequence b_n = (-1)^n(4n-4) starting with n = 1 are: -4, 8, -12, 16, -20.

The sequence bn = (-1)^n(4n - 4) is an alternating sequence, where each term alternates in sign between positive and negative. The first term is 0, and every other term after that is also 0. This is because when n is odd, (-1)^n is equal to -1, and when n is even, (-1)^n is equal to 1. Therefore, the expression simplifies to 0.

For the even terms (n = 2, 4, 6, ...), the expression simplifies to 8n - 8. These terms are positive and increase by 8 as n increases.

For the odd terms (n = 3, 5, 7, ...), the expression simplifies to -8n + 8. These terms are negative and decrease by 8 as n increases.

Therefore, the first five terms of the sequence are 0, 8, -8, 0, 16, and the sequence continues alternating between 0 and positive/negative multiples of 8 as n increases.

Learn more about sequence :

https://brainly.com/question/21961097

#SPJ11

Where  F(x)= -3x²+2x-17, there are two imaginary solutions: x = 0.33 ± 2.36i

Given   F(x)= -3x²+2x-17

Using the quadratic equation formula we have

x =   (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / 2a

x = -2 √(2² - 4 x (-3) x(-17))/2 * -3

x = -2 ± √-200/-6

x = 1/3 ± 5/3√2i

x  =  0.33333333333333 ± 2.3570226039552i

x ≈   0.33 ± 2.36i

Note that i in this case is an imaginary solution. A pure imaginary number is one with a square that is a negative real number. A complex number is the product of a real and a pure imaginary number.

Learn more about quadratic equations;
https://brainly.com/question/30098550
#SPJ1

Answer:

x = 13, y = 24.

Step-by-step explanation:

5x - 8 = 180 - (4y + 27)             (Internal alternate angles are congruent)

Also 4y + 27 =  63 + (7x - 31)    (External angle of a triangles theorem)

Simplifying the above 2 equations we get:

5x + 4y = 161  ........ (A)

7x - 4y  =  -5   ........ (B)

Adding A + B:

12x = 156

x = 13.

Now substitute x = 13 in equation A:

7(13) - 4y = -5

4y = 91 + 5 = 96

y = 24.

Answer:

x = 13

y = 24

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem, when a straight line intersects two parallel straight lines, the resulting consecutive interior angles formed are supplementary (sum to 180°).

Therefore, as line l and line m are parallel, the angle marked (7x - 31)°, and the sum of the angles marked 63° and (5x - 8)°, are supplementary:

[tex](7x - 31)^{\circ}+63^{\circ}+(5x-8)^{\circ}=180^{\circ}[/tex]

Solve the equation for x:

         [tex]7x - 31+63+5x-8=180[/tex]

                              [tex]12x +24=180[/tex]

                      [tex]12x +24-24=180-24[/tex]

                                      [tex]12x =156[/tex]

                                     [tex]\dfrac{12x}{12} =\dfrac{156}{12}[/tex]

                                         [tex]x=13[/tex]

The exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the two non-adjacent interior angles of the triangle. Therefore:

[tex](7x - 31)^{\circ}+63^{\circ}=(4y+27)^{\circ}[/tex]

Substitute the found value of x into the equation and solve for y:

     [tex]7x - 31+63=4y+27[/tex]

 [tex]7(13)- 31+63=4y+27[/tex]

     [tex]91- 31+63=4y+27[/tex]

                   [tex]123=4y+27[/tex]

           [tex]123-27=4y+27-27[/tex]

                     [tex]96=4y[/tex]

                     [tex]4y=96[/tex]

                    [tex]\dfrac{4y}{4}=\dfrac{96}{4}[/tex]

                      [tex]y=24[/tex]

Therefore, the values of x and y are:

The t-statistic for the observed slope is -0.764.

To calculate the t-statistic for the observed slope, we need to use the formula:

t = (b - β) / (SE(b))

where b is the estimated slope from the regression model, β is the hypothesized slope of 0.055, and SE(b) is the standard error of the estimated slope.

From the regression output in the problem above, we see that b = 0.0488 and SE(b) = 0.0089. Substituting these values and the hypothesized slope β = 0.055 into the formula, we get:

t = (0.0488 - 0.055) / 0.0089 = -0.764

The t-statistic for the observed slope is -0.764. This indicates that the estimated slope is about 0.764 standard errors away from the hypothesized slope of 0.055.

Learn more about  t-statistic

https://brainly.com/question/15236063

#SPJ11

The Progressives were a diverse group of people who held different beliefs and opinions, but many of them were committed to social justice and equality.

They recognized that segregation was a major problem in American society, and they worked to combat it through a variety of strategies.  

Some Progressives used their positions of power in government and the legal system to challenge segregation laws and practices. For example, Theodore Roosevelt, a Progressive president, appointed African Americans to federal positions and invited Booker T. Washington, a prominent African American leader, to dine at the White House.  

Other Progressives worked at the grassroots level, organizing protests, boycotts, and other forms of activism to challenge segregation in their communities. For example, the Niagara Movement, founded by African American intellectuals and activists, called for an end to segregation and discrimination.  

Despite their efforts, the Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 upheld the constitutionality of segregation, setting back the efforts of Progressives to combat segregation through the courts. However, Progressives and civil rights advocates continued to fight against segregation, eventually leading to the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954, which declared segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional.

Learn more about advocates here:

 https://brainly.com/question/28272829

#SPJ11

A sequence is defined recursively using the formula. If the first term of the sequence is 120 and the sequence is defined recursively, the value of f(5) is 7.5.

To determine the value of f(5), we need to apply the recursive formula to calculate each term of the sequence. The formula provided is not specified in the question, so we cannot provide a specific explanation of the formula. However, based on the given answer choices, we can determine the value of f(5).

Given that the answer choices are -15, -7.5, 7.5, 15, we can see that the sequence is increasing. Since the first term is 120, and f(5) is greater than 120, the answer must be a positive value. Therefore, the only option that satisfies this condition is 7.5.

It's important to note that without the specific recursive formula, we cannot provide a detailed explanation of how the terms of the sequence are calculated. The recursive formula would be required to generate the sequence and find the exact value of f(5).

Learn more about exact here:

https://brainly.com/question/15049305

#SPJ11

The percentage can be seen on a graph of the normal curve by shading the area under the curve between the corresponding z-scores for the given interval.

For the ostrich population, the given interval of 4.5 to 5.25 meters represents one standard deviation above the mean (4.5 + 0.75 = 5.25) and includes 34% of the population.

Therefore, we can conclude that the mean stride length of the ostrich population is 4.5 meters, and the standard deviation is 0.75 meters.

To find a similar interval for the emu population, we can use the empirical rule for normal distributions.

This rule states that approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% falls within two standard deviations, and 99.7% falls within three standard deviations.

Using this rule, we know that approximately 68% of the emu population has stride lengths within one standard deviation of the mean, which is 3 meters ± 0.5 meters.

Therefore, a similar interval to the one given for the ostriches (4.5 to 5.25 meters) would be 3.5 to 4.25 meters for the emus.

The percentage of the ostrich population with stride lengths between 4.5 and 5.25 meters can be seen on a graph of the normal curve by shading the area under the curve between the corresponding z-scores. We can find the z-scores for the interval using the formula:

z = (x - μ) /

where x is the value of the upper or lower bound of the interval, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For the given interval of 4.5 to 5.25 meters for the ostrich population:

z1 = (4.5 - 4.5) / 0.75 = 0

z2 = (5.25 - 4.5) / 0.75 = 1

We can then use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the area under the curve between z = 0 and z = 1, which is approximately 0.34 or 34%.

To see this visually, we can plot the normal curve with the mean and standard deviation marked, and shade the area between the z-scores corresponding to the interval of interest.

A similar graph can be used to show the percentage of the emu population within a given interval.

For similar question on standard deviations.

https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ11

The equation that demonstrates the distributive property is c) 38(5) = 5(38). The distributive property is a fundamental algebraic concept that states that the product of a number and a sum is equal to the sum of the products of that number and each term in the sum.

In mathematical terms, for any numbers a, b, and c, the distributive property can be written as a(b + c) = ab + ac.
Given the four options, the equation that demonstrates the distributive property is c) 38(5) = 5(38). According to the distributive property, we can rewrite this equation as 38 * 5 = 5 * 38, which demonstrates that the order of multiplication does not affect the result. The other equations do not show the distributive property, as they represent different mathematical concepts:
a) 15 + 40 = 55 is an example of addition.
b) 15 x 40 = 40 x 15 demonstrates the commutative property of multiplication.
d) 15 - 40 - 5(13 - 8) is an expression involving subtraction and multiplication, but does not demonstrate the distributive property.

To know more about distributive visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

area under the curve y = x^3 from x = 0 to x = 2, approximated using a right-endpoint approximation with 4 subdivisions, is approximately 6.31 units squared

 approximate the area under the curve y = x^3 from x = 0 to x = 2 using a right-endpoint approximation with 4 subdivisions, we first need to divide the interval [0, 2] into 4 subintervals of equal width. The width of each subinterval is:

Δx = (2 - 0) / 4 = 0.5

Next, we evaluate the function at the right endpoint of each subinterval and multiply by the width of the subinterval, and then sum these products to get the approximate area:

approximate area = f(0.5)Δx + f(1.0)Δx + f(1.5)Δx + f(2.0)Δx
                = (0.5^3)(0.5) + (1.0^3)(0.5) + (1.5^3)(0.5) + (2.0^3)(0.5)
                = 0.125 + 0.5 + 1.6875 + 4
                = 6.3125

Rounding this to two decimal places, we get an approximate area of 6.31 units squared. Therefore, the area under the curve y = x^3 from x = 0 to x = 2, approximated using a right-endpoint approximation with 4 subdivisions, is approximately 6.31 units squared.

to learn more about curves click here :brainly.com/question/15082216

#SPJ11

Removing an outlier from a data set can either increase or decrease the standard deviation, depending on the nature of the outlier and its impact on the overall distribution of the data.

The standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion or spread of data points around the mean. Outliers, which are data points that significantly deviate from the rest of the data, can have a considerable effect on the standard deviation.

When an outlier has a substantial impact on the overall distribution and is not representative of the underlying data, removing it can lead to a decrease in the standard deviation. This is because the outlier was contributing to the larger variability in the data, and its removal reduces the spread and tightens the distribution.

However, there are cases where the outlier represents genuine variability or an extreme value within the data set. Removing such an outlier may cause the standard deviation to increase. This is because the outlier was providing information about the upper or lower tail of the distribution, and its removal eliminates that extreme value, resulting in a wider spread of the remaining data points and an increase in the standard deviation.

Therefore, the impact of removing an outlier on the standard deviation depends on the nature and significance of the outlier within the data set. It is crucial to carefully consider the characteristics of the data and the reasons behind the presence of outliers before deciding whether their removal will cause an increase or decrease in the standard deviation.

To learn more about standard deviation click here, brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

we can determine whether x + y = 5 based on the information provided in the two statements.


To solve for x + y, we can use a system of equations.

Statement (1) gives us the equation 4x + y = 17. We can solve for y by subtracting 4x from both sides, giving us y = 17 - 4x.

Statement (2) gives us the equation x + 4y = 8. We can substitute y with 17 - 4x (from statement 1) to get x + 4(17-4x) = 8. Simplifying this equation gives us 15x = 60, or x = 4.

Substituting x = 4 into either statement gives us y = 1.

Therefore, x + y = 4 + 1 = 5.


Based on the information provided in the two statements, we can conclude that x + y does indeed equal 5. Statement (1) and (2) together give us enough information to solve for x and y, which allows us to confirm the main answer.

To know more about subtracting visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13619104

#SPJ11

The rate at which the water is now flowing from the tap is 100 cubic centimeters per second.

We know that it takes 40 seconds to fill a 4-liter (4000 cm³) watering can. Therefore, we can calculate the initial rate at which water flows from the tap by dividing the volume (4000 cm³) by the time (40 seconds):

Initial rate = Volume / Time = 4000 cm³ / 40 seconds = 100 cm³/second

According to the problem statement, the rate at which water flows from the tap is halved. To find the new rate, we divide the initial rate by 2:

New rate = Initial rate / 2 = 100 cm³/second / 2 = 50 cm³/second

Thus, the new rate at which the water is flowing from the tap is 50 cubic centimeters per second.

LEARN MORE ABOUT water here:  brainly.com/question/28465561

#SPJ11

Answer:

  ECHA

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the slopes of four representations of linear functions.

The line rises 1 unit for each 2 to the right. Its slope is ...

  m = rise/run = 1/2 . . . letter E

The formula for the slope between two (x, y) pairs is ...

  m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)

  m = (-8 -(-12))/(1 -(-1)) = 4/2 = 2 . . . letter C

  m = (-3 -(-6))/(-4 -2) = 3/-6 = -1/2 . . . letter H

The line rises -2 units for each 1 to the right. Its slope is ...

  m = -2/1 = -2 . . . letter A

The puzzle #4 solution is ECHA.

<95141404393>

The average root mean square velocity of the gas molecules of ozone (O3) at 100K is approximately 341 m/s, and at 3000K it is approximately 1925 m/s.

The root means square velocity (v rms) of a gas molecule is given by the formula:

v rms = √(3kT/m)

where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin, and m is the mass of a single molecule. The mass of a single ozone molecule (O3) is approximately 48 g/mol or 4.8x10^-26 kg.

At 100K, the root mean square velocity is calculated as:

v rms = √(3kT/m) = √(3 x 1.38x10^-23 J/K x 100K / 4.8x10^-26 kg) = 341 m/s

At 3000K, the root mean square velocity is calculated as:

v rms = √(3kT/m) = √(3 x 1.38x10^-23 J/K x 3000K / 4.8x10^-26 kg) = 1925 m/s

Therefore, the average root mean square velocity of the gas molecules of ozone (O3) at 100K is approximately 341 m/s, and at 3000K it is approximately 1925 m/s.

For more questions like Mass click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/19694949

#SPJ11

The range of possible sums of the two cards is from 1/3 to 1.

We know that Leon drew two fraction game cards between 1/6 and 1/2. This means that each fraction card he drew must be between 1/6 and 1/2. We can represent this as an inequality:

1/6 ≤ fraction card ≤ 1/2

To find the range of possible sums of the two cards, we need to consider the smallest and largest possible fractions that Leon could have drawn. The smallest fraction he could have drawn is 1/6, so if he drew this fraction twice, the sum of the two cards would be:

1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 = 1/3

On the other hand, the largest fraction he could have drawn is 1/2, so if he drew this fraction twice, the sum of the two cards would be:

1/2 + 1/2 = 2/2 = 1

Therefore, the range of possible sums of the two cards is from 1/3 to 1.

In other words, any sum of two fractions Leon drew between 1/6 and 1/2 will be greater than or equal to 1/3 and less than or equal to 1.

Learn more about Leon

brainly.com/question/4095483

#SPJ11

Therefore, the answer is (b) -3/2 that value of n in the exponent is -3/2.

We can write 216 as a power of 6 as follows:

216 = 6^3

Substituting this in the given equation, we get:

(1/36)^n = 6^3

We can write 6^3 as a power of 6 and 36 as follows:

6^3 = 6^(21+1) = 6^(21)6^1 = 366

1/36 = 6^(-2)

Substituting these in the equation, we get:

(6^(-2))^n = (36*6)^n

6^(-2n) = 36^n * 6^n

6^(-2n) = 6^(2n+1)

Equating the exponents, we get:

-2n = 2n + 1

Solving for n, we get:

n = -1/2

To know more about exponent,

https://brainly.com/question/11401247

#SPJ11

Answer: b and e

Step-by-step explanation:

The 98% confidence interval for the population mean time workers spend getting to work in the downtown area of Buffalo, New York, based on a sample of 15 workers, is between 16.03 and 26.63 minutes.

To calculate the confidence interval, we use the formula:

[tex]\bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

Where x is the sample mean, tα/2 is the t-score with (n-1) degrees of freedom and α = 0.01/2 (since we want a 98% confidence interval), s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the values from the given data, we get:

x = 21.13, s = 6.223, n = 15, tα/2 = 2.602

Thus, the confidence interval is:

[tex]$21.13 \pm 2.602 \cdot \frac{6.223}{\sqrt{15}}$[/tex]

= (16.03, 26.63)

Therefore, we are 98% confident that the true population mean time workers spend getting to work in the downtown area of Buffalo, New York, lies between 16.03 and 26.63 minutes.

Learn more about confidence interval: https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ11

The calculated area of one of its bases is 41 square units

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Volume = 164 cubic units

Height = 4 units

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Base area = Volume / Height

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Base area = 164/ 4

Evaluate

Base area = 41

Hence, the area of one of its bases is 41 square units

Read more about volume at

https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ9

The response times observed in the two experiments suggest that the cognitive demands of the two tasks differ, with the second task being more cognitively demanding than the first.

The very short response times of less than 100 milliseconds observed in the lab might be due to several factors. One possibility is that the participant has developed a prepotent response that is initiated almost automatically upon presentation of the stimulus. This means that the participant has become so familiar with the task that their response is almost reflexive, requiring little cognitive processing. Another possibility is that the stimulus presented was so salient or intense that it elicited an immediate and involuntary response from the participant. In the second experiment where participants say the word "now" as soon as they detect the green circle, the response times were between 100 and 200 milliseconds. This suggests that the cognitive tasks involved in this version of simple detection may require more conscious effort and attention than the tasks in the first experiment. Participants in the second experiment had to actively detect the presence of the green circle and make a conscious decision to say "now", whereas in the first experiment their response may have been more automatic. Therefore, the response times observed in the two experiments suggest that the cognitive demands of the two tasks differ, with the second task being more cognitively demanding than the first.

Learn more about cognitive demands here

https://brainly.com/question/3501299

#SPJ11

Upon consulting the z-table, the z-score closest to 0.7555 is 0.67. Therefore, the value of c is approximately 0.67.

Given information: We are told that p(z > c) = 0.2445. This means we want to find the value of c such that the probability of getting a z-score greater than c is 0.2445.

Understanding the standard normal distribution: The standard normal distribution is a symmetric bell curve with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. The area under the curve represents probabilities, and the z-scores correspond to the number of standard deviations away from the mean.

Determining the complementary probability: Since we want to find p(z > c), which is the probability of getting a z-score greater than c, we can rephrase it as finding the complementary probability p(z < c). This is because the total area under the curve is 1, so p(z > c) = 1 - p(z < c).

Looking up the z-score in the z-table: The z-table provides the cumulative probabilities for various z-scores. Since the z-table typically shows values for p(z < c), we need to find the z-score corresponding to the cumulative probability of 1 - 0.2445 = 0.7555.

Finding the closest cumulative probability in the z-table: Using the z-table, we search for the cumulative probability closest to 0.7555. The z-score associated with this cumulative probability is the one we're looking for.

Determining the value of c: Upon consulting the z-table, we find that the closest cumulative probability to 0.7555 is 0.7549, corresponding to a z-score of approximately 0.67. Therefore, the value of c is approximately 0.67.

In summary, to find the value of c, we used the complementary probability approach and looked up the closest cumulative probability in the z-table, which resulted in a z-score of approximately 0.67.

Know more about the z-score click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ11

The completed program calculates and displays the distance an object falls due to gravity on the Earth and the Moon using the formula `d = 1/2gt^2` for time values 1 through 10. The table output is formatted using `printf` to align the columns.

1. The program defines two constants, `EARTH_GRAVITY` and `MOON_GRAVITY`, for the gravitational accelerations on Earth and Moon, respectively.

2. The `distanceFallen` method takes the time of falling in seconds as an argument and calculates the distance fallen on Earth using the formula `d = 1/2gt^2`, where `g` is `EARTH_GRAVITY`.

3. The `distanceFallen` method returns the distance fallen on Earth.

4. The main method outputs a table header for the time, distance fallen on Earth, and distance fallen on Moon.

5. The main method uses a loop to calculate and display the distance fallen on Earth and Moon for time values 1 through 10.

6. The distance fallen on Moon is calculated using the same formula as Earth but with the gravitational acceleration on the Moon, `MOON_GRAVITY`.

7. The table output is formatted using `printf` with tab and newline characters to align the columns.

Learn more about gravity:

https://brainly.com/question/31321801

#SPJ11

The inequalities that satisfy the region R are x < -1, y < -1 and y < -x + 4

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

The inequalities that satisfy the region R are as follows:

The equations of these lines are

x = -1

y = -1

y = -x + 4

When represented as an inequality, we have

x < -1

y < -1

y < -x + 4

Hence. the inequalities that satisfy the region R are x < -1, y < -1 and y < -x + 4

Read more about inequalities at

https://brainly.com/question/30390162

#SPJ1

Answer:

x ≈ 8.4

Step-by-step explanation:

10

using the cosine ratio in the right triangle

cos64° = [tex]\frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{MN}{LN}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3.7}{X}[/tex] ( multiply both sides by x )

x × cos64° = 3.7 ( divide both sides by cos64° )

x = [tex]\frac{3.7}{cos64}[/tex] ≈ 8.4 ( to the nearest tenth )

Answer: [tex]\frac{1}{5} ~~~~~~~~~~ \frac{9}{5}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 5 equal parts.

The length of each part is

[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex] × [tex]9[/tex] [tex]= \frac{9}{5}[/tex] Cm

The 1-unit growth factor for f is 2. The 1-unit percent change for f is 16.67%. The initial value for f is 1. The function formula for f is f(x) = 0.6 * (2)^(x).

i. The 1-unit growth factor for f is the value of f(x+1)/f(x) for any x. Using the given values, we have:

f(2)/f(1) = 21.6/3.6 = 6

f(3)/f(2) = 3.6/0.6 = 6

Therefore, the 1-unit growth factor for f is 6.

ii. The 1-unit percent change for f is 100*(f(x+1)-f(x))/f(x) for any x. Using the given values, we have:

100*(f(2)-f(1))/f(1) = 500

100*(f(3)-f(2))/f(2) = 500

Therefore, the 1-unit percent change for f is 500%.

iii. The initial value for f is the value of f(0). Using the given values, we have:

f(0) = 0.1

Therefore, the initial value for f is 0.1.

iv. The general formula for an exponential function is f(x) = a*b^x, where a is the initial value and b is the growth factor. Using the values we found above, we can write a formula for f as:

f(x) = 0.1*6^x

To know more about function,

https://brainly.com/question/30459447

#SPJ11