Convictions can be based on the testimony of a single eyewitness, as long as he is the only witness, there are no legal rules or evidence to the contrary. Independent corroboration of his testimony was carried out in great detail before a conviction was entered.
Eyewitness testimony is what happens when a person witnesses a crime (or accident or other significant event of legal significance) and then goes to court and reminds the court all the details of what she witnessed. This involves a more complex process than initially suspected.
Human memory cannot record like a video camera: Witnesses to crimes are often unable to later recall important details, such as a full physical description of the assailant, including hair color, height, weight and age. Witness statements must be truthful and describe what the person writing the statement saw, heard or felt. It is important to remember that witness statements should be shared with everyone involved in the case, not just the court.
Eyewitness testimony is a legal term that refers to people's accounts of events they saw. For example, they might be required to describe a theft someone witnessed or a traffic accident lawsuit. This includes the identity of the perpetrator, crime scene details and more.
Learn more about Testimony:
https://brainly.com/question/29244222
#SPJ4
Symbolize the following arguments using the key
Added. Then use a long truth table to test the first for
ty. Use short truth tables to test the second and third for
ty.
1) Zither Mario is a police officer or a felon. But Mario can’t be a police officer .Therefore,Mario is a felon.
P)Mario is a police officer
F)Mario is a felon
2) If Marx was completely right about capitalism, then if the
working class becomes alienated, they will revolt. But the
working class did not revolt. Therefore, Marx was not
completely right about capitalism.
C)Marx was completely right about capitalism
A)The working class becomes alienated
R) The working class revolts
Marx was entirely correct about capitalism. A: Alienation of the working class occurs R: A working-class uprising
What is truth table explanation?A truth table is a table used in logic to assess the plausibility of complex expressions or arguments based on the plausibility of the propositions that make up those expressions or arguments. The resultant truth value of the expression or argument is shown in a separate column of a truth table, where each row represents a unique combination of truth values for the component propositions. Truth tables are used to assess the reliability of arguments and ascertain the connections between propositions that follow logically from one another. They serve as a fundamental tool in the study of logic and mathematics by offering a methodical and rigorous approach for deciphering the logical structure of intricate expressions and arguments.
To Know more about Truth table Visit:
brainly.com/question/17259890
#SPJ1
the expansion of executive authority during the new deal reflected an increasing demand by the american people for ____.
A growing demand for good administration among Americans was mirrored in the new deal's extension of presidential power.
What is meant by presidential power?Bills and resolutions voted by Congress may be approved or vetoed by the President. possesses the authority to issue checks in accordance with appropriation legislation through the Treasury Department. I shall uphold, defend, and preserve the United States Constitution in accordance with my oath of office. The Constitution specifically grants the President the power to sign or veto laws, direct the armed forces, solicit the written advice of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.The President has the authority to either sign legislation into law or veto laws passed by Congress, albeit Congress can overturn a veto with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.To learn more about presidential power, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29613013
"The expansion of executive authority during the New Deal reflected an increasing demand by the American people for more government involvement in the economy and society."
During the New Deal, President Franklin D. Roosevelt significantly expanded the power of the executive branch through the creation of new agencies and programs to address the economic crisis of the Great Depression. This expansion of executive authority reflected an increasing demand by the American people for the government to play a larger role in regulating the economy and providing support for those affected by the depression.
This shift in public opinion was a result of the widespread economic hardship and instability caused by the Great Depression. As millions of Americans struggled with unemployment and poverty, there was a growing demand for the government to take action to stabilize the economy and provide relief for those in need.
As a result, the New Deal saw the creation of programs such as the National Recovery Administration (NRA), the Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA), and the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), which expanded the government's role in regulating business practices, providing direct relief to those in need, and creating jobs. These programs, and the expansion of executive authority that accompanied them, reflected the increasing demand by the American people for a stronger government role in the economy during the New Deal era.
Learn more about New Deal https://brainly.com/question/11739226
#SPJ11
one of the major tools of bureaucratic control presidents possess is the
The president controls the bureaucracy by appointing the heads of fifteen Cabinet departments and numerous independent executive agencies, such as the CIA, EPA, and FBI. These Cabinet and agency appointments are subject to Senate confirmation.
The term bureaucracy refers to a group of unelected government officials as well as a group of executive decision makers. Historically, a bureaucracy was a government executive headed by departments composed of unelected officials. Today, a bureaucracy is the administrative system that governs any large institution, whether public or private.
Bureaucratic control is an aspect of bureaucracy that involves controlling the behavior of people in an organization through organizational structures. It replaces the direct control of managers with indirect control through hierarchies, roles, policies, rules, procedures and other structural means of standardizing activities. Tax collectors, government accountants, policemen, firefighters and soldiers are typical bureaucrats.
More directly, the president controls the bureaucracy by appointing the heads of 15 cabinet departments and numerous independent executive agencies, such as the CIA, EPA, and FBI. These Cabinet and agency appointments are subject to Senate confirmation.
Learn more about Bureaucracy:
https://brainly.com/question/30696747
#SPJ4
in the accident between joe and mary, which took place in richmond, mary proves that joe negligently ran the red light. however, joe shows that mary would not have been as seriously injured had she been wearing her seat belt as the law required. who wins?
The outcome of the case will depend on the specific facts of the case, the state's laws of comparative negligence laws and contributory negligence laws, and how the court interprets and applies those laws.
The outcome of the case will depend on the state's laws regarding comparative negligence and seat belt laws. In some states, comparative negligence laws allow for the reduction of damages awarded to a plaintiff who was partially at fault for their injuries.
In other states, failure to wear a seat belt may be considered contributory negligence, which could result in the plaintiff being barred from recovering damages.
If the state follows comparative negligence laws, the court may apportion fault between Joe and Mary and reduce Mary's damages accordingly. For example, if Mary was found to be 20% at fault for her injuries due to her failure to wear a seat belt, her damages may be reduced by 20%.
If the state follows contributory negligence laws, Mary may be barred from recovering any damages if her failure to wear a seat belt is deemed to have contributed to her injuries.
To know more about comparative negligence laws:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ4
When there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed, officers may search, arrest, or question suspects withoug obtaining a warrant or following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
In case of threat to public safety the legal procedure should be abided.
A police officer may restrict an individual to conduct a field interview if the officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity has been, is being or is about to be committed.
At the the field interview, the officer may conduct a pat-down search of the outer garments for weapons if the officer has a reasonable fear for his or her own safety as well as that of others.
A judge release a search warrant to authorize law enforcement officers to search a particular location and seize specific items.
To get a search warrant, police must show probable cause that a crime was committed and that items connected to the crime are likely to be found in the place particular by the warrant.
To know more about search warrant, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20287622
#SPJ4
what does creon initially assume is the motivating factor in the lawbreaker’s act?
Creon asserts that the Law of the God, which he believes to be the higher law than the law of the land, is what drives the lawbreaker's act behavior.
In Sophocles' book Antigone, the character Creon makes an appearance. While Creon, the king of Thebes, is tethered to the responsibilities of rule, Antigone, a young girl, assumes the role of the tragic heroine. Creon was crowned king following the contest for the throne, and after ordering Eteocles' honorary burial, he abandoned Polynices to rot on the pain of death.
The main goal of these laws, according to Creon, is to maintain stability and punish those who cause trouble or break social laws. They are based on morality and civic obligations. Creon claims that pride and defiance are also driving forces behind the lawbreaker's behavior.
Learn more about lawbreaker's act at:
brainly.com/question/13138885
#SPJ4
when they are appointed, how long do federal and supreme court justices serve?
Justices of the Federal and Supreme Courts are hired for life or until retirement, whichever comes first.
They remain in office until they pass away, resign, but are impeached and dismissed by Congress. The lifetime nomination is intended to give the judicial branch of the government stability and independence.
The President appoints justices to the federal and supreme courts with the advice and approval of the Senate. This procedure makes sure that the justices are suitably trained and experienced to do their duties. Once nominated, the justices are required to make decisions without respect to political pressure or the general public's view.
Although the political appointment of justices promotes independence and stability, it can make it more difficult to make sure that the courts reflects the needs and ideals of the period. Because of this, Supreme Court nominations are frequently divisive and intensely scrutinised by the general public and political figures.
Learn more about Federal here:
https://brainly.com/question/14080872
dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people, such as government officials is called
Dishonest or illegal behavior particularly by influential individuals, for example, government authorities is called Corruption. It is a deceptive way of behaving by those in, key, influential places, like business supervisors or government authorities. option (A) is correct.
Corruption is a form of dishonesty or a criminal offense that is embraced by an individual or an association that is dependent on a strategic, influential place, to procure unlawful advantages or misuse power for one's very own benefit.
Dishonesty is the crucial part of a greater part of offenses connecting with the securing, change, and removal of property (unmistakable or elusive) defined in criminal law such as fraud. Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about government officials:
https://brainly.com/question/14788125
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people, such as government officials is called_____.
(A) Corruption
(B) business activities
(C) public sector
(D) democracy
The policy of containment, justified by George Kennan's 1947 analysis of the international situation, called for
The policy of containment, justified by George Kennan's 1947 analysis of the international situation, called for a diplomatic and military strategy of preventing the spread of Communism through the use of economic, political, and military actions.
The Soviet Union, according to Kennan, was innately expansionist, and the only way to stop communism from spreading was to "contain" it inside its present borders. In order to fend off Soviet aggression, this included forming alliances with other nations and giving military and economic assistance to nations endangered by communist expansion.
Throughout the Cold War, the containment strategy served as the cornerstone of American foreign policy and was used to defend a variety of operations, from the Korean War to the Vietnam War.
For such more question on diplomatic:
https://brainly.com/question/30674987
#SPJ11
Can a promise that is made after the consideration is past be enforced?
Generally, a promise made after the consideration has been provided cannot be enforced because there is no legally binding agreement between the parties.
The correct answer is no.
Consideration refers to something of value (e.g., money, goods, services) given by one party in exchange for something of value given by the other party. In a contractual agreement, consideration must be given by both parties when the agreement is made.
If a promise is made after the consideration has already been provided, there is no mutual exchange of consideration and, therefore, no binding contract. For example, suppose a person promises to pay another person for services they have already provided. In that case, the promise is not enforceable because the consideration was already provided before the promise was made.
To learn more about consideration, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30650636
#SPJ4
what are 3 ideas about the government that john locke believed in?
John Locke believed in the following three ideas about the government:
Limited governmentSocial contract theorySeparation of powersThe following are some of the basic notions concerning the government in which Locke believed:
Locke endorsed the idea of limited government, which contends that the boundaries on the power of the government should be set by the agreement of the governed and the rule of law.
According to Locke's social contract theory, individuals create governments to defend their fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property.
Separation of powers: In Locke's view, the government should be composed of several divisions, each with its own responsibilities.
For such more question on government:
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ11
Fill The Blank?
compared to the other branches of government, the supreme court has _____ approval ratings.
The Supreme Court has comparatively high levels of public support compared to the other arms of government.
One of the most revered and trusted institutions in the United States is frequently considered to be the Supreme Court. The majority of Americans, regardless of political affiliation, acknowledge and respect the Supreme Court's position as the last arbitrator of legal disputes, interpreting the Constitution, and maintaining the rule of law. As a result, the Supreme Court has often had very high levels of public support, frequently outpacing those of the other parts of government in terms of popularity. Its apparent impartiality, knowledge, and independence have helped to retain its legitimacy and authority despite conflicts and criticism from time to time, making the Court an essential cornerstone of American democracy.
learn more about public support here:
https://brainly.com/question/15013725
#SPJ4
What are the 3 essential elements of a contract?
Three essential elements of a contract include:
An offer is a clear expression of willingness by one party (offeror) to enter into a contract with another party (offeree) on specific terms and conditions.Acceptance is a clear expression of the agreement by the offeree to the terms and conditions of the offer. The acceptance must be communicated to the offeror and be unqualified, which means the acceptance must be on the same terms as the offer.Consideration is when one party gives something of worth in exchange for something of value that the other party gives. Consideration can be in the form of money, goods, services, or even a promise to do something. It is essential that both parties provide consideration for the contract to be legally binding.In addition to these three essential elements, a contract must have a legal purpose and be entered into by parties with the legal capacity to enter into a contract. A contract that lacks any of these elements may not be enforceable in court.
To learn more about contract, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
based on your understanding of bond ratings and bond-rating criteria, which of the following statements is true?an indenture is a legal document that details the rights of bondholders. if the indenture includes a sinking funds provision, the bond will have less default risk.an indenture is a legal document that details the rights of bondholders. if the indenture includes a sinking funds provision, the bond will have more default risk.
The rights of the bondholders are outlined in the legal document known as an indenture. If the indenture contains a sinking money clause, the bond will be more susceptible to default.
Indenture is a written contract known as an indenture establishes or safeguards a debt or purchase obligation. When used today, it is a tool used in commercial debt or real estate transactions. When used historically, it referred to the status of an indentured servant. For a period of four to seven years, indentured servants agreed to forgo their labor in exchange for passage to the New World.
Since they made up the majority of the English immigrants in the Chesapeake colonies in the 17th century, indentured servants were crucial to the expansion of the tobacco industry in those areas.
Learn more about Indenture at:
brainly.com/question/3911798
#SPJ4
assume that the supply curve for undeveloped land is relatively inelastic. a tax levied on undeveloped land will
The tax levied on an undeveloped piece of land will always fall only on the buyers of the land, when it is assumed that the supply curve for that land is relatively inelastic.
The supply curve indicates the availability of quantities of a product in the market of an economy during a given particular period of time. When the supply curve is relatively inelastic, it explains a situation that the change in price results in a proportionately smaller change in the supply of the product in the economy. Thus, it is to be ascertained that the tax on products having relatively inelastic supply curve will be imposed on the buyers of products in the market.
Learn more about supply curve here:
https://brainly.com/question/30727125
#SPJ4
Complete question
Assume that the supply curve for undeveloped land is relatively inelastic.
A tax levied on undeveloped land will _____________________.
sometimes the parties believe consideration exists when it does not. when does this occur? choose three answers.
1. False promises are ones that do not subject the promiser to any obligations consideration exists
2. Pre-existing obligations: One party is already required to carry out or refrain from carrying out an action.
Pre-existing obligations do not refer to situations where one party is already required to carry out or refrain from carrying out an action. Pre-existing obligations refer to situations where a party is already contractually obligated to perform or refrain from performing a particular act.Giving gifts without expecting anything in return is not equivalent to entering into a contract. A contract requires consideration, which is something of value that is given or promised in exchange for something else. A gift is a voluntary transfer of property or something else of value without any expectation of receiving something in return. There is no consideration in a gift exchange, and therefore, it is not a contract.
learn more about consideration exists here:
https://brainly.com/question/25113133
#SPJ4
Can police chase motorcycles in Florida?
Answer:
A traffic offense chase is permitted (yes - that includes motorcycles) as long as the chase: can be operated safely (i.e. not in heavy traffic conditions or when harm could occur to pedestrians) chase vehicle can maintain visual contact with the suspect vehicle. chase vehicle can maintain radio contact with dispatch.
At the ______ level, government is often organized on a nonpartisan basis. A) national. B) state. C) local. D) federal.
At the local level, government is often organized on a nonpartisan basis. Therefore the correct option is (C) local level.
A nonpartisan government is a government that is not based on political parties. Such a government is made up of independent or nonpartisan public officials who are not affiliated with any political party.
Rather than concentrating on political interests, nonpartisan officials concentrate on the good of the people in their region.
A nonpartisan administration is a government that functions on a nonpartisan basis at the local, state, or federal level. It is free of political bias or influence and is dedicated to achieving the good of the people.
For such more question on government:
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ11
_____: conflict over resources, beliefs, and goals which may involve elections, laws, and influence of policy makers
Conflicts over resources, opinions, and objectives that may involve elections, legislation, and the sway of decision-makers are known as politics.
What is meant by Conflict?Conflicts are struggles and clashes of ideas, beliefs, or even moral precepts. There will always be conflict in society since it can have a variety of root causes, including personal, racial, class, caste, political, and international. We want something to happen in a story, usually something negative. We don't really care till it does. Although difficulties give rise to stress, tension itself comes from problems. In fiction, these problems are referred to as conflict. Conflict is more precisely described as a threatened, thwarted, or opposing desire.There are several factors that might lead to conflict, such as organisational structures, resource constraints, task dependency, conflicting goals, personality differences, and communication difficulties.To learn more about Conflict, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
"Political Conflict: Conflict over resources, beliefs, and goals which may involve elections, laws, and influence of policy makers."
The term that best fits the description in the question is "political conflict." Political conflict refers to the disagreements and struggles that occur over resources, beliefs, and goals within a political system.
These conflicts can involve elections, laws, and the influence of policy makers, as different groups seek to advance their own interests and achieve their goals. Political conflict is a natural and inevitable part of any political system, and it can have both positive and negative effects on the functioning of the system.
Learn more about political conflict https://brainly.com/question/28045055
#SPJ11
Which of the following was the first anti slavery political party in America?
The Liberty Party was the first political party in the United States to be solely dedicated to the abolition of slavery. It was founded in 1840 and lasted until 1848 when it merged with the Free-Soil Party.
True or false: In order to be successful, a company's managers must apply different ethical standards to themselves than they apply to their employees.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
It is important for all members of a company, including managers, to uphold the same ethical standards and to be held accountable for their actions. Applying different standards to different groups can create a culture of unethical behavior and undermine the company's success in the long term.
In order to be successful, a company's managers must apply different ethical standards to themselves than they apply to their employees. This statement is false.
What Ethical Standards Do Company Managers Should Apply?The given statement "in order to be successful, a company's managers must apply different ethical standards to themselves than they apply to their employees" is false because in order to be successful, a company's managers must apply the same ethical standards to themselves as they apply to their employees. It is important for managers to lead by example and demonstrate ethical behavior in their actions and decision-making. This helps to create a positive and ethical company culture, which can contribute to the success of the company. If managers apply different ethical standards to themselves than they do to their employees, it can create distrust and a negative work environment, which can ultimately harm the success of the company.
Learn more about code of ethics at https://brainly.com/question/24606527
#SPJ11
Although many Texas courts have overlapping jurisdiction, there are patterns to where court cases are generally filed. Match the court to the type of case it is more likely to hear.
district courts = county courts = justice courts = - family cases
- landlord-tenant disputes
- debt cases
Although many Texas courts have overlapping jurisdiction, there are patterns to where court cases are generally filed. The correct match for the following are,
district courts = family cases
county courts = debt cases
justice courts = landlord-tenant disputes
The majority of federal cases, including criminal and civil cases, can be heard in district courts. The United States and its territories are divided into 94 federal judicial districts. U.S. bankruptcy courts are located in each district.
Contrary to the medieval county courts presided over by the high sheriff of each county, a county court is a court that is located in or has jurisdiction over one or more counties, which are administrative divisions (subnational entities) within a country.
According to the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999, the rental housing tribunal was established as a body to mediate and arbitrate disputes between landlords and tenants (of residential property). The cases are settled in justice courts.
Learn more about jurisdiction at:
brainly.com/question/9147899
#SPJ4
What's a scenario in which a person would have to file more than one state tax return?
what a promise to pay a previous debt barred by a statute of limitations can be enforced without consideration.?
A promise to pay a previous debt barred by a statute of limitations may be enforced in some jurisdictions without consideration if it is in writing and signed by the person or their agent, or if the person promises to pay in order to revive a right that was previously barred by the statute of limitations is known as the "doctrine of promissory estoppel".
The doctrine states that a promise, regardless of whether consideration is present, may be enforced if it is clear and unambiguous, and if there is a detrimental reliance by the promise that induces them to change their position in a detrimentally way. In this situation, the promise relies on the promise to pay a previously barred debt, and detrimentally changes their position by choosing to not pursue other means of collection.
For the doctrine to apply, it is important to consider if the person relied on the promise to their detriment. Generally, this requires more than the person simply forgoing an opportunity to pursue the debt in some other way. If the promise relied on the promise and detrimentally changed their position in a way that would not have been done otherwise, then the promise can be enforced without consideration.
Know more about A promise to pay a previous debt here:
https://brainly.com/question/29733711
#SPJ11
in 1963, the right to an attorney for those who are unable to afford one was made law by the supreme court. in what year was the law expanded to include any crime, felony, or misdemeanor for which jail or prison time was an option?
Gideon v. Wainwright in 1963, the right to an attorney for those who are unable to afford one was made law by the supreme court.
The Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) that states must provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants accused of serious crimes who cannot afford attorneys on their own.
Breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony in Florida, was the charge against Gideon. Gideon didn't have a lawyer when he appeared in court for the trial. He requested the judge's appointment of counsel in open court because he was unable to pay for one. Because Florida law only permits appointment of counsel for impoverished defendants charged with capital offenses, the trial judge rejected Gideon's request.
In order to determine whether defendants in state court are entitled to the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, the Court agreed to hear the case.
Learn more about Gideon v. Wainwright at:
brainly.com/question/30155386
#SPJ4
what type of decision delivered by the supreme court is one that sets a new precedent in the law by which all lower courts must abide? group of answer choices moral landmark civil professional ethical
Doctrine of Stare Decisis civil decision delivered by the supreme court is one that sets a new precedent in the law by which all lower courts must abide.
A legal principle known as "stare decisis" requires courts to follow earlier decisions when deciding a case that is similar to the one at hand. Stare decisis makes sure that cases with comparable facts and circumstances are handled the same way. Simply put, it requires courts to uphold the legal precedents established by earlier rulings.
The concept of legal precedent is crucial because the U.S. common law structure has a unified system of adjudicating cases that is based on the principle of stare decisis. A precedent is a previous decision or judgment in a case. Stare decisis requires courts to review prior decisions when presiding over an ongoing case with analogous facts.
Learn more about stare decisis at:
brainly.com/question/21085371
#SPJ4
what is the purpose of regulation
The purpose of regulation is to ensure the safety, health, and welfare of the public and to ensure that businesses are operating within the law.
Regulation's goal is to create laws, standards, and norms that control how people, businesses, and other entities behave. Regulation attempts to safeguard the public interest, advance safety, fairness, and competition, and guarantee adherence to the law and moral principles.
There are many different types of regulation, such as laws, policies, rules, and standards. Governmental organisations, professional groups, or other organisations with the power to impose regulations and impose sanctions for non-compliance may establish it.
Some of the key purpose is to protect the citizens, promote fairness and equality and creating a safe environment.
For such more question on law:
https://brainly.com/question/28171613
#SPJ11
which model of decision-making suggests that justices make decisions based on personal ideologies?
The "attitudinal model" of decision-making suggests that justices make decisions based on their personal ideologies and values.
According to this theory, judges make decisions that are influenced by their own personal philosophies, attitudes, and views rather than acting as impartial interpreters of the law.
In other words, rather than only deferring to established legal precedent or the original intent of the Constitution, justices are required to base their rulings on their preexisting beliefs and preferences.
One of the most popular theories of judicial decision-making, the attitudinal model is frequently utilised by academics to explain the actions of Supreme Court justices.
For such more question on justices:
https://brainly.com/question/30085240
#SPJ11
what was the purpose of the legislation which created amtrak
The purpose of the legislation that created Amtrak (the National Railroad Passenger Corporation) was to improve and streamline passenger rail service in the United States. Prior to the creation of Amtrak, passenger rail service in the U.S. was provided by private companies, many of which were struggling financially and had reduced or eliminated service on many routes.
The Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, which established Amtrak, aimed to address these issues by creating a single entity to provide passenger rail service throughout the country. Amtrak was intended to be a government-owned corporation that would take over the passenger rail operations of private companies and provide more consistent and reliable service.
The legislation also aimed to preserve some of the historic and cultural significance of passenger rail service by requiring Amtrak to continue to provide service to small and remote communities, including many that would not be served by profitable private companies.
Overall, the purpose of the legislation that created Amtrak was to establish a national passenger rail system that would provide reliable and affordable service to Americans, promote economic growth and tourism, and help preserve the cultural heritage of passenger rail travel in the United States.
The purpose of the legislation which created Amtrak was to provide a national intercity passenger rail service in the United States.
In 1970, Congress passed the Rail Passenger Service Act, which established the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, or Amtrak, as a for-profit corporation.
The legislation aimed to revitalize the struggling passenger rail industry in the United States by providing federal funding and consolidating existing passenger rail services under one entity. Prior to the creation of Amtrak, passenger rail service in the US was operated by private companies, many of which were facing financial difficulties and discontinuing service.
See more about Amtrak at https://brainly.com/question/25017918.
#SPJ11
True/False? reliance on a certain type of oral contract can be enough to remove it from the statute of frauds.
The given statement "reliance on a certain type of oral contract can be enough to remove it from the statute of frauds" is true as oral contracts are considered as valid as written contracts.
State laws include statutes of frauds. The statutes of fraud vary from state to state, but they are all constrained. Only some types of oral contracts are covered by statutes of fraud. Ordinarily, an enforceable contract can be either written or oral, but in some cases, statutes of frauds specify two key conditions that must be met for certain oral contracts in order for them to be upheld.
Six distinct categories of contracts are governed by the statute of frauds. Contracts that are enforceable are not required to be in writing under the statute. However, if a written contract is required by the statute but only an oral agreement exists, the oral agreement will be regarded as voidable in law.
Learn more about statute of frauds at:
brainly.com/question/6806950
#SPJ4
