The long-term effects of the solutions introduced in American society have had profound implications for civil rights and equality. The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s was influenced by ideals of equality and justice, leading to landmark legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
These laws were intended to combat racism and pave the way. Discrimination and Segregation Paving the way for civil rights progress for African Americans and other marginalized groups.
The struggle for equality and social justice continues to shape American society, inspiring subsequent movements and ongoing efforts to address systemic inequalities and promote inclusiveness.
To learn more about Effects on American Society:
https://brainly.com/question/14398699
#SPJ4
Compare & Contrast Consider the two groups that rebelled against the government: farmers and Revolutionary War veterans. Compare what life was probably like for these people as opposed to what life might have been like for the Founders.
Farmers and Revolutionary War veterans rebelled against the government in different contexts and had distinct experiences compared to the Founders of the United States. Here is a comparison and contrast of their lives in socioeconomic background:
Farmers: Farmers were typically rural inhabitants, heavily reliant on agriculture for their livelihood. They faced challenges such as variable crop yields, debt, and dependence on market conditions.
Revolutionary War Veterans: Veterans had served in the military during the Revolutionary War and often came from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
Founders: The Founders were primarily educated elites, well-versed in political philosophy and intellectual discourse. They held influential positions and were actively involved in shaping the new nation.
Learn more about inhabitants here:
brainly.com/question/30126043
#SPJ4
What do we mean when we say that the Declaration of Independence established the purpose of the American government? Why did the Founding Fathers believe that the Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property are inalienable? Is it fair to say that King George was being tyrannical, why or why not?
Answer:
When we say that the Declaration of Independence established the purpose of the American government, we mean that it laid out the fundamental principles that would guide the formation and operation of the government. The Declaration identifies certain rights that are considered to be inherent and inalienable, including the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It also asserts that governments are instituted to secure these rights and that the people have the right to alter or abolish government that fails to do so.
The Founding Fathers believed that these rights were inalienable because they are inherent to all human beings and cannot be legitimately taken away by any government or individual. They believed that these rights were endowed by a higher power or by nature itself, and that they were not granted by the government. Therefore, the government's role was to protect and secure these rights, rather than grant or take them away.
Regarding King George, the Founding Fathers believed that he was being tyrannical, and this is reflected in the list of grievances included in the Declaration of Independence. The King was accused of violating the rights of the colonists, imposing taxes without their consent, and denying them the right to trial by jury. The colonists believed that they were being treated unfairly and that their rights were being trampled upon. The Declaration of Independence was a statement of their resolve to establish a government that would protect their rights and secure their liberty.
It is fair to say that the colonists felt that they were being oppressed by King George, but as with any historical event, there are different perspectives and interpretations. Some historians argue that the colonists' grievances were exaggerated and that the American Revolution was not solely about the violation of rights, but also about economic and political interests. Nonetheless, it is clear that the Founding Fathers believed that the rights of the colonists were being violated and that they saw the establishment of a new government as necessary to protect those rights.
who was the open door policy suggested by
Answer:The US secretary of State John Hay
Explanation:
Secretary of State John Hay
Compare and Contrast What are some of the similarities and differences between the American Revolution and the French Revolution?
The American Revolution (1775-1783) and the French Revolution (1789-1799) were two huge occasions. While the two unrests shared specific likenesses, for example, their objectives of testing government and laying out additional libertarian social orders, they likewise showed particular contrasts in their causes, techniques, and results.
American Revolution: The American pilgrims took part in a prevalently equipped struggle against the English Crown, with prominent occasions like the clashes of Lexington and Harmony, the Attack of Yorktown, and the development of local armies and Mainland Armed force.
French Revolution: The French Revolution enveloped a more extensive scope of activities, including famous uprisings, political and social changes, the raging of the Bastille, the Rule of Fear, and the ascent of Napoleon Bonaparte.
Learn more about French Revolution, from:
brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ4
Make Inferences How might living in different cultures have helped Sacagawea as a guide?
Answer:
The inferences are Language skills, cultural understanding, Survival skills, Geographical knowledge and social collaboration
Explanation:
Language Skills: Sacagawea belonged to the Shoshone tribe but was later captured and lived among the Hidatsa tribe. As a result, she became fluent in both Shoshone and Hidatsa languages. This linguistic diversity would have been invaluable during her time as a guide, as she could communicate with various Native American tribes encountered along the journey, acting as an interpreter between different cultures.
Cultural Understanding: Sacagawea's exposure to different cultures allowed her to develop a deep understanding of Native American customs, traditions, and protocols. This understanding would have helped her navigate interactions with different tribes and ensure a more respectful and peaceful engagement between the expedition and Native Americans they encountered. Her cultural sensitivity would have made her a valuable mediator and facilitator of communication.
Survival Skills: Living in different cultures likely exposed Sacagawea to a variety of survival techniques, such as hunting, fishing, gathering food, and navigating different terrains. These skills would have been essential for survival during the arduous journey through unfamiliar territories. Sacagawea's knowledge of diverse environments, natural resources, and ways to adapt would have contributed to the expedition's overall success.
Geographic Knowledge: Sacagawea's familiarity with different cultures would have also expanded her knowledge of the geography of the regions she inhabited. She would have been aware of various landmarks, rivers, mountains, and trails, which would have been valuable when guiding the expedition through unfamiliar territory. Her understanding of the land could have helped the group navigate and make strategic decisions.
Social Connections: Sacagawea's interactions with different cultures might have provided her with valuable social connections and networks. She may have known individuals from different tribes who could offer assistance, information, or safe passage during the expedition. These relationships could have been crucial for securing supplies, guiding the group, or mitigating potential conflicts.
A central theme of the first part of this course will be how Koreans sought to imagine and create in the new nation in the wake of the collapse of the Joseon Dynasty. Based on the materials in the lecture AND readings, use this forum to discuss these questions (you don't have to answer all of them. The main point is to use one or some of them as a starting point).
What were some of the causes and consequences of Korea's crisis in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
How did Korean intellectuals imagine a new nation?
What were some of the limitations or contradictions of trying to forge a modern/enlightened nation?
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Korea faced several causes and consequences that contributed to its crisis. One significant cause was the decline and collapse of the Joseon Dynasty, which had ruled Korea for centuries.
The dynasty faced internal challenges such as corruption, factionalism, and a rigid social hierarchy, which weakened its governance and led to popular discontent. External pressures from imperial powers, particularly Japan, also played a crucial role. Japan's aggressive expansionist policies, culminating in the annexation of Korea in 1910, further destabilized the country and stripped it of its sovereignty.
In response to the crisis, Korean intellectuals and activists sought to imagine a new nation. They grappled with questions of identity, modernity, and the need for political and social reforms. Intellectuals like Yun Ch'iho and An Chunggŭn played pivotal roles in shaping the discourse around nationalism and independence. They drew inspiration from Western ideologies and concepts, such as democracy, nationalism, and enlightenment, while also incorporating elements of traditional Korean culture and values. They envisioned a Korea that would be modern, independent, and capable of resisting foreign domination.
However, forging a modern and enlightened nation in Korea also faced limitations and contradictions. One major challenge was the entrenched social structure and conservatism within Korean society. The hierarchical Confucian values and traditions clashed with the ideas of individual rights and equality propagated by the intellectuals. Moreover, the influence of traditional institutions, such as the monarchy and Confucian scholars, hindered rapid and radical changes in the social and political order.
Additionally, the imperial ambitions of Japan and other global powers posed significant obstacles to Korea's nation-building efforts. The Japanese colonization of Korea in 1910 not only extinguished the dream of independence but also suppressed Korean culture, language, and identity. The colonization period witnessed severe repression, forced assimilation, and exploitation of Korean resources, undermining the realization of the envisioned modern nation.
To know more about Joseon Dynasty. here
https://brainly.com/question/10367878
#SPJ4
In summary, Korea's crisis in the late 19th and early 20th centuries stemmed from both internal and external factors. Korean intellectuals responded by envisioning a new nation that combined Western ideas with Korean cultural heritage. However, limitations such as societal conservatism and the intervention of imperial powers hindered the realization of their vision. The struggle for a modern and enlightened Korea continues to shape the country's history and identity today.
Directions: Use this passage and your knowledge of U.S. history to answer questions 1 through 3.
African-American Sailors
African Americans contributed greatly to the growth of maritime commerce in the United States. Beginning in colonial times, slaves, with their masters’ permission, hired themselves out as sailors. Some served as translators on slave ships. Merchant ships also offered a means of escape for runaway slaves. A few escapees even took to the sea as pirates. Seafaring was one of the few occupations open to free African Americans. They served on clippers, naval vessels, and whaling ships from the 1700s into the late 1800s. Federal crew lists from Atlantic seaports show that during this time, African Americans made up 10 percent or more of sailors on American ships. Seafaring was an especially dangerous line of work for free blacks. They risked capture in southern ports, where they were often thrown in jail or sold into slavery.
The author states that life was especially dangerous for free African-American sailors because
A. American prosperity depended on their work alone.
B. the worst jobs on board ship were always assigned to them.
C. they ran the risk of capture and enslavement in southern ports.
D. they were more likely than white sailors to contract scurvy.
The correct answer is C. Free African-American sailors faced the risk of capture and enslavement in southern ports.
The passage mentions that free African Americans who worked as sailors risked being thrown in jail or sold into slavery if they were captured in southern ports.
This made seafaring a particularly dangerous occupation for them. The other options mentioned in the passage are not stated as reasons for the danger faced by free African-American sailors.
To know more about American visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11746598
#SPJ11
which characteristic enabled the city of melaka to become the largest city in southeast asia in the fourteenth century?
The Melaka's strategic location, international trade connections, political stability, cultural diversity, and technological advancements all played a significant role in its ascent as the largest city in Southeast Asia during the fourteenth century.
The rise and dominance of the city of Melaka in the fourteenth century can be attributed to several key characteristics that enabled its growth and establishment as the largest city in Southeast Asia at that time.
Strategic Location: Melaka was situated along the narrowest point of the Malacca Strait, a vital maritime trade route connecting the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea.
This advantageous location made it a crucial trading hub and a natural gathering point for ships traveling between the East and West.
International Trade: Melaka attracted merchants from various parts of the world, including China, India, Arabia, and Persia.
The city became a vibrant center for international trade, facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures.
It offered a diverse range of valuable commodities such as spices, textiles, precious metals, porcelain, and more.
Political Stability: Under the leadership of the powerful Sultanate of Melaka, the city enjoyed relative stability and security, which encouraged merchants and traders to settle and conduct their business activities.
The sultanate's administration promoted a favorable environment for trade by providing protection, issuing laws and regulations, and establishing diplomatic relations with neighboring states.
Cultural Exchange: Melaka's strategic location and cosmopolitan nature fostered a rich cultural exchange.
The city served as a melting pot of different civilizations, religions, and languages.
This cultural diversity not only enhanced the city's appeal but also contributed to the growth of arts, architecture, and knowledge, attracting scholars, artists, and thinkers from different parts of the world.
Technological Advancements: Melaka was known for its advanced maritime technology, particularly in shipbuilding and navigational expertise.
Local shipyards produced robust and efficient vessels, enabling the city to dominate maritime trade routes.
This technological advantage further bolstered Melaka's position as a thriving trading port.
These characteristics allowed Melaka to become a prosperous and influential center of commerce, culture, and knowledge, attracting traders and travelers from far and wide.
For similar questions on Melaka's strategic
https://brainly.com/question/14457076
#SPJ8
The Melaka's strategic location, international trade connections, political stability, cultural diversity, and technological advancements all played a significant role in its ascent as the largest city in Southeast Asia during the fourteenth century.
The rise and dominance of the city of Melaka in the fourteenth century can be attributed to several key characteristics that enabled its growth and establishment as the largest city in Southeast Asia at that time.
Strategic Location: Melaka was situated along the narrowest point of the Malacca Strait, a vital maritime trade route connecting the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea.
This advantageous location made it a crucial trading hub and a natural gathering point for ships traveling between the East and West.
International Trade: Melaka attracted merchants from various parts of the world, including China, India, Arabia, and Persia.
The city became a vibrant center for international trade, facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures.
It offered a diverse range of valuable commodities such as spices, textiles, precious metals, porcelain, and more.
Political Stability: Under the leadership of the powerful Sultanate of Melaka, the city enjoyed relative stability and security, which encouraged merchants and traders to settle and conduct their business activities.
The sultanate's administration promoted a favorable environment for trade by providing protection, issuing laws and regulations, and establishing diplomatic relations with neighboring states.
Cultural Exchange: Melaka's strategic location and cosmopolitan nature fostered a rich cultural exchange.
The city served as a melting pot of different civilizations, religions, and languages.
This cultural diversity not only enhanced the city's appeal but also contributed to the growth of arts, architecture, and knowledge, attracting scholars, artists, and thinkers from different parts of the world.
Technological Advancements: Melaka was known for its advanced maritime technology, particularly in shipbuilding and navigational expertise.
Local shipyards produced robust and efficient vessels, enabling the city to dominate maritime trade routes.
This technological advantage further bolstered Melaka's position as a thriving trading port.
These characteristics allowed Melaka to become a prosperous and influential center of commerce, culture, and knowledge, attracting traders and travelers from far and wide.
For similar questions on Melaka's strategic
brainly.com/question/14457076
#SPJ8
What did the members of NATO pledge to do if any member nation was attacked?
Accept refugees from the nation that had been attacked
Respond as if they themselves had been attacked
Ask the United Nations for help
Allow Soviet expansion and influence to grow
Answer:
Respond as if they themselves had been attacked
Explanation:
The members of NATO pledged to respond as if they themselves had been attacked if any member nation was attacked. This principle is known as collective defense, where an attack against one member is considered an attack against all members, and they are committed to providing assistance and support.
What did Kennedy think of the policy of massive retaliation?
A. He believed it was inflexible and should not be used over minor conflicts
B. He personally did not believe in it, but Congress overruled him
C. He believed it had kept peace, and would further build nuclear weapons
D. He believed that the United States had reached a perfect level of nuclear weapons
The correct answer is A. He believed it was inflexible and should not be used over minor conflicts.
President John F. Kennedy was critical of the policy of massive retaliation, which was a Cold War strategy adopted by his predecessor, President Dwight D. Eisenhower. The policy involved the threat of using nuclear weapons in response to any aggression by the Soviet Union or its allies. Kennedy believed that this approach was inflexible and did not provide a proportional response to minor conflicts. He argued for a more nuanced and flexible approach to dealing with potential threats, which led to the development of the doctrine of "flexible response." This doctrine aimed to provide a range of military options beyond the immediate use of nuclear weapons, including conventional forces and limited military interventions.
Causes and Effects What role did Jackson’s popularity play in the elections of 1836 and 1840?
Andrew Jackson was a popular President who had gained a great deal of support from the American people. His popularity played an essential role in the elections of 1836 and 1840.
The following are the causes and effects of his popularity in these two elections:
Cause 1: Jackson was seen as a strong leader who stood up for the common man. He was a charismatic figure who had won the hearts of many Americans.
Effect 1: Jackson's popularity helped him win the presidency in 1828 and 1832. His influence was so great that he was able to choose his successor in 1836.
Cause 2: The Whig Party emerged in 1836 as a result of Jackson's policies. They were opposed to Jackson's economic policies and wanted to limit the power of the executive branch.
Effect 2: Jackson's popularity helped his chosen candidate, Martin Van Buren, win the presidency in 1836. However, the Whigs were able to win the presidency in 1840 by capitalizing on Jackson's weaknesses.
Cause 3: Jackson's policies, such as his veto of the Second Bank of the United States, made him a controversial figure. Some Americans saw him as a tyrant who was abusing his power.
Effect 3: Jackson's popularity declined in the years leading up to the election of 1840. The Whigs were able to exploit this decline by portraying themselves as the defenders of liberty and the common man.
To know more about President visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11616771
#SPJ11
In september of 1774, delegates from all of the 13 colonies (except georgia) met in philadelphia to discuss the worsening situation with the english. this meeting was called the?
The First Continental Congress was an important event in American history that helped set the stage for the American Revolution. It was a significant step toward colonial unity and resistance to British authority, and it established a framework for future collaboration and action by the colonies.
In September of 1774, delegates from all of the 13 colonies (except Georgia) met in Philadelphia to discuss the worsening situation with the English. This meeting was called the First Continental Congress.
The First Continental Congress met in 1774 in response to the British Parliament's passage of the Coercive Acts, which were intended to punish the colonies for the Boston Tea Party and to strengthen British authority over colonial affairs. The Congress resolved to stop the importation of British goods and to demand that the Coercive Acts be repealed. It also approved a statement of grievances and rights that affirmed the colonists' loyalty to the British Crown while also asserting their right to self-government and freedom from parliamentary authority. It established the Continental Association, which would oversee the enforcement of a boycott of British goods, and agreed to reconvene in May 1775 if their demands were not met.
In September of 1774, delegates from all of the 13 colonies (except Georgia) met in Philadelphia to discuss the worsening situation with the English. This meeting was called the First Continental Congress. The Coercive Acts, which were intended to punish the colonies for the Boston Tea Party and to strengthen British authority over colonial affairs, prompted the Congress to meet.
The Congress resolved to stop the importation of British goods and to demand that the Coercive Acts be repealed. It also approved a statement of grievances and rights that affirmed the colonists' loyalty to the British Crown while also asserting their right to self-government and freedom from parliamentary authority. It established the Continental Association, which would oversee the enforcement of a boycott of British goods, and agreed to reconvene in May 1775 if their demands were not met.
The First Continental Congress was an important event in American history that helped set the stage for the American Revolution. It was a significant step toward colonial unity and resistance to British authority, and it established a framework for future collaboration and action by the colonies.
To know more about collaboration visit:
brainly.com/question/30235523
#SPJ11
Connect Today to What are some issues that the two leading American political parties disagree on today?
The Democratic and Republican parties in the United States disagree on several key issues today.
The disagreements of the Democratic and Republican partiesDemocrats generally support expanding access to healthcare, progressive taxation, climate change action, comprehensive immigration reform, stricter gun control measures, and progressive stances on social issues.
Republicans, on the other hand, tend to favor limited government involvement in healthcare, lower taxes, varied positions on climate change, stricter immigration enforcement, protecting Second Amendment rights, and conservative positions on social issues.
It's important to note that individual politicians within each party may hold different views, and party stances can change over time.
Read more on political parties here https://brainly.com/question/19298043
#SPJ4
State 3 possible goals of human rights campaigns
We can see here that 3 possible goals of human rights campaigns are:
Promote Equality and Non-DiscriminationProtect Civil and Political RightsEnsure Social and Economic Rights: What is human rights?Human rights are inherent rights and freedoms that every individual possesses by virtue of being human. They are universal, indivisible, and inalienable, meaning they apply to all people, cannot be separated or taken away, and are applicable regardless of nationality, ethnicity, gender, religion, or any other status.
One goal of a human rights campaign may be to advocate for equality and non-discrimination in all aspects of society. This could involve addressing discrimination based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, disability, or any other characteristic.
Learn more about human rights on https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Explain the importance of
• Copperheads • Clara Barton
• writ of habeus corpus
Copperheads were an important part of the American Civil War. They were Northern Democrats who opposed the Lincoln administration's war policies and wanted the war to end with a peaceful settlement.
This group of people was key in shaping the course of the war, as they helped to sway the public opinion in the North against the war. They formed the Union party and held sway in some state legislatures, where they passed laws meant to impede the war effort, such as imposing high taxes on certain items related to the war.
This taxation, and their opposition to the war, served to cause even wider divisions among the populace than already existed. Copperheads also played a key role in inflaming distrust and hatred between the opposing factions.
They sought to "persuade" citizens in the North to join their cause, and in doing so, they caused significant sectarian divides. The disdain for the Copperheads was so deep that their homes and businesses were sometimes the targets of violence. Copperheads were thus an important part of the Civil War, having a profound effect on both the course of the war and the way the American people viewed the conflict.
To know more about Copperheads , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1488582
#SPJ4
The Question-
Explain the importance of Copperheads
Make Inferences What were some long-term effects of the Vietnam War?
The Vietnam War had several long-term effects and continues to shape many aspects of today's society. First, war was widely viewed as unnecessary and based on false assumptions, leading to a loss of confidence in government.
The war also fueled anti-war sentiment and activism, increased skepticism about military intervention, and focused on diplomatic solutions to future conflicts. In addition, the war had a significant impact on veterans, many of whom suffered physical and mental health problems and difficulties reintegrating into civilian life. It also drew attention to the plight of prisoners of war and the need for better support systems for returning soldiers.
The divisive nature of war and its impact on society continues to be an important subject of debate and reflection, influencing foreign policy decisions and military operations.
To learn more about Vietnam War:
https://brainly.com/question/182779
#SPJ4
Use the Terms & Names list to identify each sentence online or on your own paper.
A. Horace Mann
B. Dorothea Dix
C. Elizabeth Cady Stanton
D. steerage
E. suffrage
F. strike
G. nativist
H. Sojourner Truth
I. Harriet Tubman
J. Shaker
K. "push" factor
L. "pull" factor
M. temperance movement
I was opposed to recent immigrants.
Answer:
The correct answer is G. nativist
POSTTEST: Skills for Social Studies 1
The Roman Empire fell because of hostile invaders. These invaders took down
the powerful empire and even destroyed the city of Rome itself. According to
historian Dr. Adrian Goldsworthy, the Roman Empire had been in decline for
decades. In his book How Rome Fell, he explains that food shortages, poor
leadership, and divisions within the empire all weakened Rome. These
weaknesses weren't enough to end the Roman Empire, however. It took hostile
invaders to defeat Rome once and for all.
Which sentence best evaluates the credibility of this historical
argument?
The sentence that best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument is: According to historian Dr. Adrian Goldsworthy, the Roman Empire had been in decline for decades. In his book How Rome Fell, he explains that food shortages, poor leadership, and divisions within the empire all weakened Rome.
What is a posttest?A posttest refers to an evaluation or test that is done after an instructional unit to measure the effectiveness of the teaching or instruction. It is a form of test given after the learning session is over. Its main purpose is to assess and evaluate the learner's knowledge retention, understanding, and level of mastery of the subject taught. In simple words, it helps in measuring whether the learner has successfully achieved the learning objectives or not.
What is credibility?Credibility refers to the ability to be believed or trusted. In other words, credibility means the degree of confidence that an individual has in a particular argument, theory, or information. Credibility is crucial when it comes to evaluating the reliability and truthfulness of a piece of information.
According to the text given, the historian Dr. Adrian Goldsworthy explains that food shortages, poor leadership, and divisions within the Roman Empire all weakened Rome. This shows that the argument is based on historical evidence and reliable sources.
Therefore, the sentence that best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument is: According to historian Dr. Adrian Goldsworthy, the Roman Empire had been in decline for decades. In his book How Rome Fell, he explains that food shortages, poor leadership, and divisions within the empire all weakened Rome.
For more questions on: credibility
https://brainly.com/question/24266723
#SPJ8
Draw Conclusions Over time, do you think the Catholic Church’s missions were more helpful or harmful to the Native Americans? Explain.
The Catholic Church's missions had both helpful aspects, such as education and healthcare, and harmful effects, including cultural erasure and forced assimilation, making it difficult to make a definitive conclusion about their overall impact on Native Americans.
Assimilation refers to the process of incorporating or absorbing individuals or groups into a dominant culture, often resulting in the loss of their distinctive cultural practices, traditions, and identities.
In the context of the Catholic Church's missions and Native Americans, assimilation entailed pressuring indigenous people to adopt European customs, languages, and religious beliefs while suppressing their own cultural heritage.
This forced assimilation had profound consequences, leading to the erosion of Native American cultures, languages, and ways of life.
Assimilation efforts aimed to reshape indigenous populations in the image of the dominant society, often at the expense of their cultural autonomy and resilience.
Learn more about Assimilation here:
https://brainly.com/question/23064258
#SPJ4
Explain how close the South came to victory in 1862.
This close to the South came to victory in 1862. The loss of control of these rivers was a significant strategic defeat for the Confederacy.
The states of the United States that had formally announced their separation from the Union fought for the Confederacy as well during the American Civil War. They were South Carolina, Virginia, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Tennessee. Confederate States of America.
From February 8, 1861, through May 9, 1865, the Confederate States of America, sometimes known as the Confederate States just the Confederacy, was an unofficial separatist confederate republic located in the Southern United States.
Learn more about the Confederacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766761
#SPJ4
Draw Conclusions Why is the donkey resisting FDR?
The donkey is resisting FDR in the political cartoon because the cartoonist is portraying FDR's New Deal policies as being excessive and burdensome. The New Deal policies were FDR's way of responding to the Great Depression, which was a time of economic hardship for many Americans.
Some of the policies that were implemented included creating jobs through public works programs, establishing social security, and regulating the stock market.
However, the cartoonist is suggesting that these policies are causing more harm than good. The donkey is a symbol of the Democratic Party, which was the party that FDR represented. The fact that the donkey is resisting FDR's policies suggests that there were some members of the Democratic Party who were opposed to the New Deal.
The donkey is depicted as being weighed down by the New Deal policies, with its legs sinking into the ground. This is meant to convey the idea that the policies were burdensome and excessive. The cartoonist is drawing the conclusion that FDR's policies were doing more harm than good, and that they were stifling economic growth rather than promoting it.
Overall, the cartoon is a criticism of FDR's New Deal policies, and it is suggesting that they were causing more harm than good. The donkey's resistance is meant to convey the idea that there were some members of the Democratic Party who were opposed to these policies, and that they were having a negative impact on the economy.
To know more about policies visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30702255
#SPJ11
Explain the relationship between Soviet actions in Eastern Europe and the formation of NATO.
Soviet actions in Eastern Europe, particularly their establishment of communist governments through military occupation, led to different things.
What did these lead to?This heightened concerns among Western European countries about the spread of Soviet influence and potential aggression. In response, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was formed in 1949 as a collective defense alliance.
Its primary purpose was to provide a security umbrella for its member states against any potential Soviet aggression. The Soviet Union's actions in Eastern Europe served as a catalyst for the formation of NATO, creating a military alliance that aimed to deter Soviet expansion and safeguard Western European nations.
Read more about North Atlantic Treaty Organization here:
https://brainly.com/question/8415530
#SPJ4
how did robert mcnamara describe the reason that the u.s. sent troops to vietnam? did this agree or disagree with what lyndon johnson said on tv to the american people?
Answer:
Robert McNamara, who served as Secretary of Defense under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, described the reason that the U.S. sent troops to Vietnam as an effort to contain the spread of communism. He believed that the Vietnam War was part of a broader global struggle against communism, and that the U.S. had a responsibility to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.
This view is consistent with the policy of containment that had been adopted by the U.S. government in the early years of the Cold War, which sought to prevent the spread of communism through military and diplomatic means.
However, McNamara's view did not entirely agree with what President Lyndon Johnson said on TV to the American people. In his public statements, Johnson emphasized the need to defend South Vietnam from communist aggression and portrayed the U.S. involvement in Vietnam as a response to an external threat. He did not explicitly frame the war as part of a global struggle against communism, as McNamara did.
Furthermore, Johnson's public statements downplayed the difficulty of the conflict and the challenges that U.S. forces faced in Vietnam. He expressed confidence in the U.S. military's ability to achieve victory and reassured the American people that the war would not be a protracted conflict. McNamara, on the other hand, was well aware of the challenges and complexities of the war and expressed doubts about the effectiveness of U.S. strategy and tactics.
Overall, while McNamara and Johnson shared some common views about the reasons for U.S. involvement in Vietnam, there were also significant differences in how they framed the conflict and the challenges that the U.S. faced.
what was the first year that a president officially pardoned a turkey?
1. True or false? The House and the Senate each have to pass an identical version of a bill before it can be signed into law by the President.
2. What is the role of Congress in the policymaking process?
1) The given statement, "The House and the Senate each have to pass an identical version of a bill before it can be signed into law by the President," is false because the House and the Senate can pass different versions of a bill. 2) The role of Congress in the policymaking process is to propose, debate, and pass legislation that can become law.
1) In the legislative process, both the House of Representatives and the Senate need to pass a bill, but they can propose and pass different versions of it. If the two chambers pass different versions, the bill goes through a process called reconciliation. During reconciliation, representatives from both chambers come together to resolve the differences between the two versions and create a single, unified bill.
2) Congress plays a crucial role in the policymaking process by proposing, debating, and passing legislation that can be enacted into law. As the legislative branch of the U.S. government, it represents the interests of the people, conducts hearings, and votes on bills, shaping the direction and implementation of public policy.
To know more about policymaking , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30488596
#SPJ4
After 700 CE, the highest and largest buildings in North America north of Mexico were built by the Anasazi Six Nations Mandan Iroquois
Answer:yes，it is.
Explanation:Just as Teotihuacan had emerge.
Problems and Solutions Why did the colonists react so violently to the Tea Act?
The colonists reacted violently to the Tea Act for several reasons. First, the Tea Act of 1773 allowed the British East India Company to have a monopoly on tea trade in the colonies. This meant that colonists could only buy tea from this company, which angered local merchants and smugglers who relied on tea trade for their livelihoods.
Second, the Tea Act also imposed a tax on tea, although it made the price of tea lower overall. This angered the colonists because they believed that Parliament did not have the right to tax them without their consent. They viewed the tax as a violation of their rights as British subjects.
Third, the colonists saw the Tea Act as another example of British oppression and control over their trade. They felt that it was an attempt to assert British authority and maintain control over the colonies.
As a result of these grievances, the colonists reacted violently to the Tea Act. They organized protests, such as the Boston Tea Party, where they dumped tea into the harbor. These actions were a form of resistance and a way for the colonists to assert their opposition to British policies. The violent reaction to the Tea Act ultimately contributed to the growing tensions between the colonies and Britain, and played a significant role in the lead-up to the American Revolution.
To know more about violently visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27409768
#SPJ11
katsushika hokusai - primary source charles stewart smith collection, gift of mrs. charles stewart smith, charles stewart smith jr., and howard caswell smith, in memory of charles stewart smith, 1914 (made in the 19th century)
lThe primary source you are referring to is a collection of Japanese woodblock prints by Katsushika Hokusai (1760-1849), one of the most famous Japanese artists of all time.
How to explain the informationThe collection was donated to the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston in 1914 by Mrs. Charles Stewart Smith, Charles Stewart Smith Jr., and Howard Caswell Smith, in memory of their father, Charles Stewart Smith.
The collection includes over 1,000 prints, dating from the early 1800s to the late 1830s. The prints depict a wide variety of subjects, including landscapes, flowers, animals, and scenes from Japanese mythology and history.
The Charles Stewart Smith Collection is one of the most important collections of Japanese woodblock prints in the world. It is a valuable resource for scholars and students of Japanese art, and it is also a popular attraction for visitors to the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
Learn more about primary source
https://brainly.com/question/896456
#SPJ4
(12) Summarize the Reagan Coalition of the 1980's in two paragraphs.
(10) Summarize the New Deal Coalition of 1932 in two paragraphs.
(4) List the eight reasons why many political scientists argue that there has been a decline in America's two-party system on the national level
The Reagan Coalition of the 1980s was a political alliance between conservative Republicans and Democrats.
The Reagan coalition was formed in 1980 when Ronald Reagan, a former actor and California governor, defeated incumbent Democratic President Jimmy Carter. The coalition was made up of four main groups: social conservatives, economic conservatives, foreign policy hawks, and libertarians.
The social conservatives of the coalition included religious fundamentalists, anti-abortion activists, and supporters of traditional family values. The economic conservatives were mostly business leaders who supported free-market policies and deregulation. The foreign policy hawks were concerned with strengthening American national defense and taking a hard line against communism. Libertarians favored individual liberty and minimal government intervention in the economy. The Reagan coalition's platform included lower taxes, smaller government, and a stronger national defense.
(10) The New Deal Coalition of 1932 was a political alliance between various groups that supported President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal policies during the Great Depression. The coalition was made up of four main groups: urban liberals, ethnic minorities, labor unions, and farmers.
Urban liberals included intellectuals, academics, and professionals who supported social reform policies.
Ethnic minorities were attracted to the New Deal's policies that helped alleviate poverty and discrimination. Labor unions were supported by the New Deal's pro-labor policies, which included the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act. Farmers were supported by New Deal policies that provided subsidies and price supports for agricultural products. Together, these groups formed a broad-based coalition that supported FDR's policies of government intervention in the economy.
4) The eight reasons why many political scientists argue that there has been a decline in America's two-party system on the national level are:
1. Increasing polarization: Both parties have become increasingly ideologically polarized, making it harder to find common ground.
2. Third-party challenges: Third-party candidates have become more common, challenging the dominance of the two major parties.
3. Decline in party loyalty: Fewer Americans identify strongly with either the Democratic or Republican parties.
4. Money in politics: The influence of money in politics has made it harder for third-party candidates to compete.
5. Media fragmentation: The rise of new media platforms has made it harder for the two major parties to control the political narrative.
6. Changing demographics: America's changing demographics have made it harder for the two major parties to appeal to a broad range of voters.
7. Rise of independent voters: More Americans are identifying as independent voters, making it harder for the two major parties to hold onto their base.
8. Gerrymandering: Gerrymandering has allowed the two major parties to create safe districts, reducing competition and making it harder for third-party candidates to win.
To learn more about Reagan Coalition, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9993866
#SPJ11
Alcatuieste un text narativ de cel putin 10 randuri in care sa povestesti o intamlare petrecuta in vacanta de vara
Am explorat și zona înconjurătoare, vizitând și alte plaje în apropiere.
Înr-una dintre seri, am hotărât să facem o plimbare pe faleza în timpul apusului.
Pe măsură ce soarele cobora pe cer, culorile roșu-oranj și mov au împânzit cerul. Atmosfera era de-a dreptul magică și am făcut multe fotografii pentru a păstra acele momente de neuitat.
Desigur, voi fi bucuroasă să te ajut cu întrebarea ta. Iată un text narativ de cel puțin 10 rânduri în care povestesc o întâmplare petrecută în vacanța de vară:
În vara trecută, am avut o experiență minunată în timpul vacanței mele de vară. M-am decis să merg într-o excursie la mare împreună cu familia mea. Destinația noastră a fost o frumoasă stațiune de pe litoralul Mării Negre.
Am plecat devreme dimineața și am ajuns în stațiune în jurul prânzului. Am găsit un hotel confortabil chiar pe malul mării și am făcut rapid check-in-ul.
To know more about întrebarea visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3791591
#SPJ11
In vacanta de vara, am avut parte de o intamplare neobisnuita. Mergeam impreuna cu familia mea intr-un mic orasel de pe litoral. Intr-una din zile, am hotarat sa ne aventuram intr-o excursie cu barca pe mare. Vremea era frumoasa, iar valurile linistite ne-au incantat privirea.
Dupa cateva ore de plimbare, am observat un grup de delfini jucandu-se in apropierea barcii noastre. Erau atat de gratioși și jucau cu atata bucurie incat nu am putut sa nu ii admiram. Am reusit sa filmam si sa fotografiem acest moment magic.
Pe masura ce continuam sa navigam, am descoperit o mica insula neexplorata. Am decis sa ancoram si sa ne aventuram pe tarmul insulei. Plaja era neatinata, cu nisip fin si apa limpede. Am petrecut cateva ore plimbandu-ne pe plaja, explorand flora si fauna insulei. Am gasit chiar si scoici unice pe care le-am adaugat la colectia noastra.
Inainte de a pleca, am decis sa facem un picnic pe plaja. Am savurat mancarea delicioasa, privind apusul de soare spectaculos. A fost o experienta unica care ne-a adus multa bucurie si amintiri pretioase. Aceasta intamplare ne-a demonstrat cat de frumoasa si diversa poate fi natura si cat de important este sa petrecem timp de calitate impreuna.
Learn more about aventuram
https://brainly.com/question/12543172
#SPJ11
