Find AP if PQ=1 and AR=2
Geometry

Answer:

$50,328

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the amount after 18 years you find 2.4 percent of 27,000 which you then multiply by 2 (semiannually) and then multiply that number by 18. Once you get that you add it to the original 27,000.

The point on the plane x - 2y + 3z = 6 that is closest to the point ( 0 , 1 , 1 ) is (3, 1, 0).

To find the point on the plane closest to (0, 1, 1), we need to find a point (x, y, z) on the plane x - 2y + 3z = 6 that minimizes the distance between (x, y, z) and (0, 1, 1). This is equivalent to minimizing the square of the distance between the points, which is given by:

Using the equation of the plane, we can write:

Substituting this into the equation for d², we get:

Taking the derivative of d² with respect to both x and y, and setting them equal to 0, we get a system of two equations:

2(x - 0) + 2((6 - x + 2y)/3 - 1)(-1/3) = 0

2(y - 1) + 2((6 - x + 2y)/3 - 1)(2/3) = 0

Simplifying these equations, we get:

x - 2y + 3z = 6

x + 4y = 18

Solving for x and y in terms of z, we get:

x = 18 - 4y

y = (18 - x)/4

Substituting these expressions into the equation of the plane, we get:

Substituting y = (18 - x)/4 into this expression, we get:

Thus, the point on the plane closest to (0, 1, 1) is given by:

x = 9

y = (18 - x)/4 = 3/2

z = 1 - x/9 = 2/3

So the point is (9, 3/2, 2/3).

Learn more about plane

https://brainly.com/question/28247880

#SPJ4

The probability that all three measurements of the voltage will lie between 116 and 118 is approximately 0.0025.

To solve this problem, we need to standardize the measurements of the voltage to obtain a standard normal distribution. We can do this by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the measured voltage, μ = 120 is the mean, σ = 2 is the standard deviation, and Z is a standard normal random variable. We want to find the probability that all three measurements will lie between 116 and 118, which can be written as:

P(116 < X < 118)³ = P((116 - 120)/2 < Z < (118 - 120)/2)³ = P(-2 < Z < -1)³

Using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard normal distribution, we can find that P(Z < -1) = 1 - P(Z < 1) = 1 - 0.841 = 0.159 and P(Z < -2) = 1 - P(Z < 2) = 1 - 0.977 = 0.023. Therefore, P(-2 < Z < -1) = P(Z < -1) - P(Z < -2) = 0.159 - 0.023 = 0.136. Finally, the probability that all three measurements will lie between 116 and 118 is:

P(-2 < Z < -1)³ = 0.136³ ≈ 0.0025

Therefore, the probability is approximately 0.0025.

To know more about probability, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780#
#SPJ11

According to the information provided, we have a figure with three points labeled X, O, X, the distance between the first X and O is 11 cm, and the distance between O and the second X is 5 cm looks like

The quadratic equation is x ax2+bx+c=0, which is a single-variable quadratic polynomial. a 0. Since this polynomial is quadratic, the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that it has at least one solution. Solutions can be simple or complex. A quadratic equation is a quadratic equation. This indicates that there is at least one word that needs to be squared. The expression "ax2 + bx + c = 0" is one of the commonly used solutions to quadratic equations. where are the numerical coefficients or constants a,b,c. where the variable 'X' is unknown.

According to the information provided, I have a shape with three points labeled X, O, and X, with 11cm spacing between primary X and O, and 5cm spacing between O and secondary X. there is. We are given the task of finding a solution for x, but this is not stated directly.

Knowing that x denotes the length of the segment labeled 'X', we can proceed as follows:

Consider the length of each of the three segments.

First X in O:

11 cm sec X to O:

5cm

First X to second X:

x cm (whatever you are looking for)

A point O acts as a connection from segment X to O from O to the second X, so the sum of their lengths must equal the length from segment X to the second X .

11cm+5cm=xcm

16 cm = ×

So the value of x is 16 cm.

In this case, measurements are displayed in centimeters, so there is no need to round to the nearest hundredth.

To know more about quadratic equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30098550

#SPJ1

The value of in the form y = f(x) by eliminating the parameter is y(t) = x - 2.

Identify the parameter that needs to be eliminated. Determine what type of parameter it is (independent, dependent, etc.). Determine how the parameter relates to the other variables in the equation.

Use algebraic manipulation techniques to eliminate the parameter. Check the final result to ensure that the parameter has been eliminated.

The expressions are x(t) = 3 + t² - 1 and y(t) = t².

We represent x(t) as x.

Now the expression is:

x = 3 + t² - 1

Simplify the expression

x = 2 + t²

Subtract 2 on both side, we get

t² = x - 2

Take square root on both side, we get

t = √x - 2

Now substitute the value of t in y(t) = t².

y(t) = (√x - 2)²

y(t) = x - 2

To learn more about eliminating the parameter link is here

brainly.com/question/15316914

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Express x(t) = 3 + t² - 1 and y(t) = t² in the form y=f(x) by eliminating the parameter. (express numbers in exact form. use symbolic notation and fractions where needed.)

Y =

Amy can make 9 half-pound servings of chicken with 4 1/2 pounds of chicken.

To determine the number of half-pound servings of chicken, Amy can make with  [tex]4 1/2[/tex] pounds of chicken, we need to divide the total weight of chicken by the weight of each serving.

Convert 4 1/2 pounds to an improper fraction:

[tex]4 1/2 = (4 \times 2 + 1) / 2 = 9/2[/tex]

Divide the total weight of chicken by the weight of each serving:

[tex]9/2 / 1/2 = 9/2 \times 2/1[/tex] (reciprocal of 1/2) = 9/1 = 9

Therefore,  Amy can make 9 half-pound servings of chicken with 4 1/2 pounds of chicken.

Learn more about fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/21449807

#SPJ1

If you had used a lower confidence level with the same set of students, the confidence interval would have been narrower. Lower confidence levels result in smaller intervals, as they require less certainty about the parameter being estimated.

If a lower confidence level had been used with the same set of students, the confidence interval would have been narrower. This is because a lower confidence level means that there is less certainty required, and therefore a smaller range of values that would be considered acceptable. However, it's important to note that using a lower confidence level also means that there is a higher chance of the interval not capturing the true population parameter, so it's important to consider the trade-off between precision and accuracy when choosing a confidence level.

Learn more about confidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/29048041

#SPJ11

The evaluated integral is: [tex]e^t i + t^5 j + (In(5t) t - t) k + C[/tex]

To evaluate the integral [tex]\int (e^t i + 5t^4 j + In(5t) k) dt[/tex], we integrate each component of the vector function separately, with respect to t:

[tex]\int e^t i dt = e^t i + C_1[/tex]

[tex]\int 5t^4 j dt = t^5 j + C_2[/tex]

[tex]\int In(5t) k dt = (In(5t) t - t) k + C_3[/tex]

where C₁, C₂, and C₃ are constants of integration.

Therefore, the antiderivative of the vector function is:

[tex]\int (e^t i + 5t^4 j + In(5t) k) dt = e^t i + t^5 j + (In(5t) t - t) k + C[/tex]

where C is a constant of integration that encompasses all three constants of integration.

Thus, the final answer is:

[tex]\int (e^t i + 5t^4 j + In(5t) k) dt = e^t i + t^5 j + (In(5t) t - t) k + C[/tex]

Learn more about integral

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

Rounding to two decimal places, we can say that Hannah's equivalent number of hours in Canada is approximately 341.80

To answer this question, we need to convert Hannah's hours worked in the US to the equivalent number of hours in Canada, based on the reported average and standard deviation.

First, we need to calculate the z-score for Hannah's hours worked:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is Hannah's hours worked (11), μ is the reported average for self-employed individuals in Canada (41), and σ is the reported standard deviation (10).

z = (11 - 41) / 10 = -3

Next, we can use a z-score table or calculator to find the corresponding percentile rank for this z-score. A z-score of -3 corresponds to a percentile rank of approximately 0.13, or the 13th percentile. This means that Hannah's hours worked in the US are lower than approximately 87% of self-employed individuals in Canada.

To find the equivalent number of hours in Canada, we can use the percentile rank and the inverse cumulative distribution function (CDF) for a normal distribution with the reported mean and standard deviation:

z = invNorm(p, μ, σ)

where p is the percentile rank (0.13), μ is the reported average (41), and σ is the reported standard deviation (10).

z = invNorm(0.13, 41, 10) = 30.28

This means that the z-score corresponding to the 13th percentile is 30.28. We can now use this z-score to find the equivalent number of hours in Canada:

x = μ + z * σ

x = 41 + 30.28 * 10 = 341.8

Know more about z-score here:

https://brainly.com/question/15016913

#SPJ11

.

To prove that if a is an integer and d is an integer greater than 1, then the quotient and remainder obtained when a is divided by d are [a/d] and a − d[a/d], respectively, we need to use the Division Algorithm.

The Division Algorithm states that for any two integers a and d with d>0, there exist unique integers q and r such that a = dq + r, where r is the remainder and 0 ≤ r < d.

Now, let's apply this algorithm to the given problem. We have:

a = dq + r

We want to express q and r in terms of a and d. To do this, we first divide both sides by d, giving:

a/d = q + r/d

Now, we take the floor function of both sides (i.e., the greatest integer less than or equal to a/d), giving:

[a/d] = q

Next, we multiply both sides by d and subtract from a, giving:

a - d[a/d] = a - dq = r

Therefore, the quotient and remainder obtained when a is divided by d are [a/d] and a − d[a/d], respectively. This proves the statement.

To learn more about integer click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29834917

#SPJ4

the correct statements are: H1 is closed under scalar multiplication and matrix addition, H2 is closed under scalar multiplication but is NOT a subspace of V, and H2 is NOT closed under matrix addition.

First, let's examine the properties of the two subsets, H1 and H2, in relation to the vector space V. H1 is the subset of V that contains all 3 x 3 triangular matrices, and we can see that it is closed under scalar multiplication because multiplying a triangular matrix by a scalar will still result in a triangular matrix.

Additionally, H1 is closed under matrix addition because adding two triangular matrices will result in another triangular matrix.

On the other hand, H2 is the subset of V that contains all 3 x 3 matrices whose traces are integers. We can see that H2 is closed under scalar multiplication because multiplying any matrix by a scalar will not affect the trace, so the resulting matrix will still have an integer trace.

However, H2 is not a subspace of V because it is not closed under matrix addition. Adding two matrices with integer traces may result in a matrix with a non-integer trace.

Therefore, the correct statements are: the correct statements are: H1 is closed under scalar multiplication and matrix addition, H2 is closed under scalar multiplication but is NOT a subspace of V, and H2 is NOT closed under matrix addition.

To know more about scalar multiplication, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/8349166

#SPJ11

To find the regression's prediction for a classroom with 22 students, you can use the given OLS regression equation: Test-Score = 520.4 - 5.82 × CS. In this equation, CS represents the class size.

Since the class size is 22 students, you can plug this value into the equation:

Test-Score = 520.4 - 5.82 × 22

Test-Score = 520.4 - 127.04

Test-Score ≈ 393.36

So, the regression's prediction for that classroom's average test score is approximately 393.36.

Learn more about  regression's prediction here:

https://brainly.com/question/30670065

#SPJ11

The inventory management formula A(q) = k/q + cm + qh/2, we will find the first and second derivatives with respect to q, dA/dq and d^2A/dq^2.

1. Find the first derivative, dA/dq:
Start by differentiating each term of the formula with respect to q.

For the first term, k/q:
Using the power rule, rewrite the term as kq^(-1), and differentiate.
d(kq^(-1))/dq = -kq^(-2)

For the second term, cm:
Since it has no q term, its derivative is 0.

For the third term, qh/2:
Differentiate using the power rule.
d(qh/2)/dq = h/2

Combine the derivatives:
dA/dq = -kq^(-2) + 0 + h/2
dA/dq = -k/q^2 + h/2

2. Find the second derivative, d^2A/dq^2:
Now differentiate dA/dq with respect to q.

For the first term, -k/q^2:
Rewrite the term as -kq^(-2), and differentiate.
d(-kq^(-2))/dq = 2kq^(-3)

For the second term, h/2:
Its derivative is 0, as there is no q term.

Combine the derivatives:
d^2A/dq^2 = 2kq^(-3) + 0
d^2A/dq^2 = 2k/q^3

In summary, using the inventory management formula the first derivative of the average weekly cost function, dA/dq, is -k/q^2 + h/2, and the second derivative, d^2A/dq^2, is 2k/q^3.

To know more about inventory management formula - https://brainly.com/question/15577575

#SPJ11

The rate of change of the area of a rectangle with one of its sides given by a(s) = 10s² is 20s.

To find the rate of change of the area with respect to the side length, we need to differentiate the area function a(s) with respect to s.

The area function is given by a(s) = 10s². To differentiate, we apply the power rule: d(a(s))/ds = 2 * 10s²⁻¹ = 20s.

This means that the rate of change of the area with respect to the side length is 20s, which represents the rate at which the area is increasing or decreasing as the side length s changes.

To know more about power rule click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/23418174#

#SPJ11

The measure of the angle m<C is 34 degrees

To determine the measure of the angle, we need to take into considerations the trigonometric identities in mathematics.

These identities are;

Trigonometric identities also have their ratios written as;

sinθ = opposite/hypotenuse

tan θ = opposite/adjacent

cos θ = adjacent/hypotenuse

Using the sine identity, we have;

sin C = 14/25

Divide the values

sin C= 0. 5600

Find the sine inverse of the value

C = 34 degrees

Learn more about trigonometric identities at: https://brainly.com/question/7331447

#SPJ1

In a Monopsonistic labor market, the employer will maximize profits by employing workers up to that point at which marginal revenue product equals marginal resource (labor) cost.

The statement is TRUE

A monopsony occurs when a labor market has a single or dominant employer. This means that the employer has negotiating power with potential employees. As a result, they have wage-setting power in the industry labor market.

In a competitive market, the imposition of a minimum wage above the equilibrium wage necessarily reduces employment, as we learned in the module on perfectly competitive labor markets. In a monopsony market, however, a minimum wage above the equilibrium wage could increase employment at the same time as it boosts wages!

The statement is TRUE

Learn more about Monopsonist at:

https://brainly.com/question/30547071

#SPJ4

The area of the surface is 180π.

The intersection of the paraboloid and the plane is given by x² + y² = 20. This is a circle of radius √(20) centered at the origin.

To find the surface area, we can use the formula:

A = ∫∫√(1 + [tex](fx)^2[/tex] + [tex](fy)^2)[/tex] [tex]dA[/tex]

where [tex]fx[/tex] and [tex]fy[/tex] are the partial derivatives of f([tex]x,y[/tex]) = x² + y² with respect to x and y, respectively, and [tex]dA[/tex] is the area element in the [tex]xy[/tex]-plane.

We have:

[tex]fx[/tex] = 2x

[tex]fy[/tex] = 2y

So,

1 + ([tex]fx[/tex])² + [tex](fy[/tex])² = 1 + 4x² + 4y² = 1 + 4(x² + y²) = 1 + 4(20) = 81

Thus, the surface area is:

A = ∫∫√(1 + ([tex]fx)[/tex]² + ([tex]fy[/tex])²) [tex]dA[/tex]

= ∫∫√81 [tex]dA[/tex]

= 9∫∫ [tex]dA[/tex]

= 9π(20)

= 180π

Therefore, the area of the surface cut from the paraboloid by the plane is 180π.

Learn more about paraboloid

brainly.com/question/30925041

#SPJ11

The exponential function f with base b is defined by f(x) = bˣ, b > 0, and b ≠ 1. Using interval notation, the domain of this function is (-∞, ∞) and the range is (0, ∞).

As an exponential function is defined for all real numbers, its domain is all real numbers, which can be written as (-∞, ∞), in interval notation.

Yet, the range of an exponential function is never zero.

This is due to the fact that the outcome of raising any real number to a positive power, as the exponential function does, will always be greater than 0. As a result, the exponential function with base b has a range of (0, ∞).

To learn more about domain visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1045262

#SPJ4

We need to be cautious in interpreting this result since it is based on a sample and not the entire population.

If the confidence interval includes the reported rate of 31%, then the result is consistent with the reported rate. This means that we can be reasonably confident that the true proportion of defective candies in the population is around 31%, based on the sample data.

On the other hand, if the confidence interval does not include the reported rate of 31%, then the result is not consistent with the reported rate. This means that we cannot be confident that the true proportion of defective candies in the population is actually 31%, based on the sample data.

In the given question, the confidence interval for the proportion of defective candies does not include 31%, so the result is not consistent with the reported rate. This suggests that the true proportion of defective candies in the population may be different from 31%, based on the sample data. However, we need to be cautious in interpreting this result since it is based on a sample and not the entire population.

To learn more about population visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11

The roof lets in 663 watts of light per square meter.

If 780 watts per square meter (w/m2) of light strikes the roof and it has an 85% transmittance, 85% of the light goes through the roof, and the other 15% is absorbed or reflected by the roof.

We can apply the following calculation to determine how many watts per square meter of light travel through the roof:

(Percent transmittance / 100) x Watts of light striking the roof = Watts of light going through the roof

When we substitute the provided values, we get:

Light streaming through the roof in watts = (85 / 100) x 780 w/m2

Light flowing through the roof in watts = 0.85 x 780 w/m2.

Light coming through the roof in watts = 663 w/m2 (rounded to the next whole number)

As a result, The roof lets in 663 watts of light per square meter.

Learn more about percent here:

https://brainly.com/question/28670903

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, slope intercept form is y = mx + b

A good way to find the slope is (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)

So, (-1 - 4)/(0 - -2) = (-5)/(2) = -5/2 or -2.5

y = -2.5x + b

b is for the y unit when the line crosses the x axis. Therefore, b = -1.

y = -2.5x -1

The Value of the double integral is 9/2.

To Evaluate the double integral ∫∫D x dA, we need to express the region D as a type I or type II region, and then integrate over that region.

For D enclosed by the lines y = x, y = 0, x = 3, we can see that the region is a right triangle with vertices at (0,0), (3,0), and (3,3), so it can be expressed as a type I region with:

a. D = {(x, y) | y ≤ x ≤ 3, 0 ≤ y ≤ x}

or as a type II region with:

b. D = {(x, y) | 0 ≤ y ≤ 3, y ≤ x ≤ 3}

To evaluate the double integral using either of these regions, we can use iterated integrals.

Using a type I region:

∫∫D x dA = ∫0³ ∫y³ x dy dx

= ∫0³ ∫0x x dy dx

= ∫0³ ½x² dx

= 9/2

Using a type II region:

∫∫D x dA = ∫0³ ∫0y y dx dy

= ∫0³ ½y² dy

= 9/2

.

To Learn More About integral

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The two other angles of rotation that take A to B are

If we wish to rotate point A on the unit circle by a negative 5π/4 radians, one method is to begin at point A and proceed clockwise with an angle of 5π/4 radians. Negative angles denote counterclockwise movement.

When attempting to find another rotation that transports A to B, we may augment -5π/4 radians by 2π (or multiples of 2π), yielding:

-5π/4 + 2π = 3π/4 radians

Alternatively, subtracting multiples of 2π from -5π/4 radians results in yet another rotation taking A to B:

-5π/4 - 2π = -13π/4 radians

Learn more about unit circle at

https://brainly.com/question/29268357

#SPJ1

The initial amount to be invested by the first-year teacher in order to retire at 40 would be $12,763. Option 2.

The future value of an investment with continuous compounding is determined by the formula:

FV = Pe^(rt)

where:

FV = $150,000

r = 7.12% = 0.0712

t = 40 years

Substituting these values into the formula:

$150,000 = Pe^(0.0712*40)

e^(2.848) = P

P ≈ $12,763

Therefore, the teacher must initially invest approximately $12,763 to retire with at least $150,000 in the account.

More on future value of investments can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/20344604

#SPJ1

The mean of monthly cell phone bills today is different from $48.41. (2) his would be a false positive result,(3) having a large sample size, or having high variability in the data.

A null hypothesis is a type of hypothesis which explains the population parameter whose purpose is to test the validity of the given experimental data.

(a) The null hypothesis for the researcher's test could be:

H0: The mean of monthly cell phone bills today is equal to $48.41.

The alternative hypothesis could be:

Ha: The mean of monthly cell phone bills today is different from $48.41.

(b) A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected, even though it is actually true. In this case, it would mean that the researcher concludes that the mean of monthly cell phone bills today is different from $48.41, when in reality it is not. This would be a false positive result, and it could happen due to various factors such as using a significance level that is too high, having a small sample size, or experiencing random sampling error.

(c) A Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected, even though it is actually false. In this case, it would mean that the researcher concludes that the mean of monthly cell phone bills today is equal to $48.41, when in reality it is different. This would be a false negative result, and it could happen due to various factors such as using a significance level that is too low, having a large sample size, or having high variability in the data.

Learn more about Hypothesis here

https://brainly.com/question/31319397

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is 7 socks.

Step-by-step explanation:

To ensure one matching pair, you need to pull out 4 socks. If none of the first three match, the fourth one will guarantee a matching pair.

You will then need to pull out 3 more socks, for a total of 7 socks, to ensure two matching pairs.

The average value of the function a(v) = 8v - 4v on the interval [1, 5] is 12.

To find the average value of a function on a given interval, we need to use the formula:

average value = (1/(b-a)) × integral from a to b of f(x)dx

In this case, the function is a(v) = 8v - 4v and the interval is [1, 5]. So we have:

average value = (1/(5-1)) × integral from 1 to 5 of (8v - 4v)dv

Simplifying the integral, we get:

average value = (1/4) × integral from 1 to 5 of 4vdv

Taking the integral, we get:

average value = (1/4) × [2v²] from 1 to 5

Plugging in the limits of integration, we get:

average value = (1/4) × [(2×5²) - (2×1²)]

Simplifying, we get:

average value = (1/4) × (50 - 2)

average value = (1/4) × 48

average value = 12

Therefore, the average value of the function a(v) = 8v - 4v on the interval [1, 5] is 12.

To learn more about average here:

brainly.com/question/24057012#

#SPJ11

b) Making a Type I error in this context would mean rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

c) Making a Type II error in this context would mean failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false.

The null and alternative hypotheses for this situation can be stated as follows:

Null hypothesis: The mean of monthly cell phone bills is equal to $48.41.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean of monthly cell phone bills is different from $48.41.

Symbolically:

H0: μ = $48.41

Ha: μ ≠ $48.41

where μ represents the population mean of monthly cell phone bills.

b) Making a Type I error in this context would mean rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

In other words, it would mean concluding that the mean of monthly cell phone bills is different from $48.41 when it is not actually different. This is also known as a false positive, or a level of significance.

c) Making a Type II error in this context would mean failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false.

In other words, it would mean concluding that the mean of monthly cell phone bills is not different from $48.41 when it is actually different. This is also known as a false negative, or a beta error.

A type II error occurs when the sample size is too small or the hypothesis test is not powerful enough to detect a real difference.

Learn more about null hypothesis.

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

To find an invertible matrix P such that D = P^-1 AP is a diagonal matrix, we need to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrix A.

First, we find the eigenvalues by solving the characteristic equation det(A - λI) = 0:

det([0 -9][9 0] - λ[1 0][0 1]) = det([-λ -9][9 -λ]) = λ^2 + 81 = 0

Solving for λ, we get λ = ±9i.

Next, we find the eigenvectors by solving the equation (A - λI)x = 0:

For λ = 9i, we have [0 -9][9 0] - 9i[1 0][0 1] = [-9i -9][9 -9i], which reduces to [-i 1][1 i]x = 0. Solving this system of equations, we get x = [i 1]T.

For λ = -9i, we have [0 -9][9 0] + 9i[1 0][0 1] = [9i -9][9 9i], which reduces to [i 1][-1 i]x = 0. Solving this system of equations, we get x = [1 -i]T.

So the eigenvectors for A are [i 1]T and [1 -i]T.

Now we construct the matrix P using the eigenvectors as columns:

P = [i 1][1 -i] = [i 1][-i -1]

To check that P is invertible, we calculate its determinant:

det(P) = det([i 1][-i -1]) = -2i

Since the determinant is not zero, P is invertible. We can find its inverse using the formula P^-1 = (1/det(P))adj(P), where adj(P) is the adjugate of P:

adj(P) = [-i -i][-1 -i] = [-1 i][-1 -i] = [-1-i -i][-1-i i]

So P^-1 = (1/-2i)[-1-i -i][-1-i i] = [(1-i)/2i (1+i)/2i][(-1-i)/2i (1-i)/2i]

Finally, we can compute D = P^-1 AP:

D = [(1-i)/2i (1+i)/2i][(-1-i)/2i (1-i)/2i][0 -9][9 0][(-1-i)/2i (1-i)/2i][(1-i)/2i (1+i)/2i]

D = [(1-i)/2i (1+i)/2i][(-1-i)/2i (1-i)/2i][0 -9][9 0][(-1-i)/2i (1-i)/2i][(1-i)/2i (1+i)/2i]

D = [(-9i)/2 0][0 9i]

Therefore, the matrix P = [(i 1)(1 -i)] and D = [(-9i)/2 0][0 9i] satisfy the condition D = P^-1 AP, and P is invertible.

For more questions on matrix: https://brainly.com/question/28202651

#SPJ11