To find the general solution of the given system of differential equations, we need to solve each equation separately and then combine the solutions to form the general solution.
Given the system of differential equations:
dx/dt = 9x,
dy/dt = -4y.
To find the solution for dx/dt, we can separate the variables and integrate both sides:
∫ dx/x = ∫ 9 dt.
This yields ln|x| = 9t + C₁, where C₁ is the constant of integration. By taking the exponential of both sides, we have:
|x| = e^(9t + C₁) = e^(9t) * e^(C₁).
Letting C = ±e^(C₁), we can write the solution for dx/dt as:
x(t) = Ce^(9t).
Similarly, to find the solution for dy/dt, we separate variables and integrate:
∫ dy/y = ∫ -4 dt.
This gives ln|y| = -4t + C₂, where C₂ is the constant of integration. By taking the exponential of both sides, we have:
|y| = e^(-4t + C₂) = e^(-4t) * e^(C₂).
Letting D = ±e^(C₂), we can write the solution for dy/dt as:
y(t) = De^(-4t).
Therefore, the general solution to the given system is:
x(t) = Ce^(9t),
y(t) = De^(-4t),
where C and D are constants. These solutions represent the family of curves that satisfy the original system of differential equations.
Learn more about differential here:
https://brainly.com/question/31383100
#SPJ11
prove the statement using the , definition of a limit. lim x → 1 7 3x 5 = 2
Using the definition of a limit, we can prove that lim(x→1) (7/(3x+5)) = 2.
According to the definition of a limit, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that if 0 < |x - 1| < δ, then |(7/(3x+5)) - 2| < ε.
Let's begin by analyzing the expression |(7/(3x+5)) - 2|.
|(7/(3x+5)) - 2| = |(7 - 2(3x + 5))/(3x + 5)| = |(7 - 6x - 10)/(3x + 5)| = |(-6x - 3)/(3x + 5)|.
To simplify the expression further, we can observe that if |x - 1| < 1/2, then 0 < x < 3/2.
Therefore, |-6x - 3| < 3(3/2) + 3 = 9/2 + 3 = 15/2.
Similarly, |3x + 5| < 3(3/2) + 5 = 9/2 + 5 = 23/2.
So, |(-6x - 3)/(3x + 5)| < (15/2)/(23/2) = 15/23.
Now, let's choose δ = min{1/2, ε(23/30)}. By choosing this value of δ, we ensure that if 0 < |x - 1| < δ, then |(7/(3x+5)) - 2| < ε.
Therefore, we have shown that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that if 0 < |x - 1| < δ, then |(7/(3x+5)) - 2| < ε. This satisfies the definition of a limit.
Hence, we can conclude that lim(x→1) (7/(3x+5)) = 2.
To learn more about limit - brainly.com/question/12211820
#SPJ11
n problems 1–20 determine whether the given differential equation is exact. if it is exact, solve it. (2x - 1) * dx + (3y + 7) * dy = 0
The given differential equation is exact c is an arbitrary constant.
To determine if the given differential equation is exact, we can check if the partial derivatives of the coefficients with respect to x and y are equal. Let's do that:
∂/∂y (2x - 1) = 0
∂/∂x (3y + 7) = 0
Since both partial derivatives are zero, the differential equation is exact.
To solve the exact differential equation, we need to find a potential function F(x, y) such that ∂F/∂x = 2x - 1 and ∂F/∂y = 3y + 7.
Integrating the first equation with respect to x, we get:
F(x, y) = x² - x + g(y)
Here, g(y) is an arbitrary function of y.
Now, we can differentiate F(x, y) with respect to y:
∂F/∂y = d/dy (x² - x + g(y))
= g'(y)
Comparing this with the second equation, we can see that g'(y) = 3y + 7.
Integrating g'(y) = 3y + 7 with respect to y, we get:
g(y) = (3/2)y² + 7y + c
Here, c is an arbitrary constant.
Therefore, the general solution to the given exact differential equation is: F(x, y) = x² - x + (3/2)y² + 7y + c where c is an arbitrary constant.
TO know more about differential equation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32645495
#SPJ11
Use Euler's method with step size 0.5 to compute the approximate y-values y≈ y(0.5), y2 ≈ y(1), y3 ≈ y(1.5), and y4y(2) of the solution of the initial-value problem
y' = 1 - 3x + 4y y(0) = - 4
y_{1} = sqrt(0.5)
y2=
y3=
Y4=
Using Euler's method with a step size of 0.5, we can approximate the y-values for the given initial-value problem. The approximate y-values are y ≈ -4.5 at x = 1.5, y2 ≈ -5.25 at x = 2, y3 ≈ -6.125 at x = 2.5, and y(4) = y(3) ≈ -8.0625.
Euler's method is a numerical approximation technique for solving ordinary differential equations. To apply Euler's method, we start with the initial condition and iteratively compute the y-values at specified x-values using the given step size.
Given the initial-value problem y' = 2 + 3x + 4y, y(1) = -4, we can express it in the form dy/dx = f(x, y) = 2 + 3x + 4y. Using Euler's method with a step size of 0.5, we can approximate the y-values as follows:
For x = 1.5:
y ≈ y(1) + f(1, y(1)) * 0.5
≈ -4 + (2 + 31 + 4(-4)) * 0.5
≈ -4.5
For x = 2:
y2 ≈ y(1.5) + f(1.5, y(1.5)) * 0.5
≈ -4.5 + (2 + 31.5 + 4(-4.5)) * 0.5
≈ -5.25
For x = 2.5:
y3 ≈ y(2) + f(2, y(2)) * 0.5
≈ -5.25 + (2 + 32 + 4(-5.25)) * 0.5
≈ -6.125
For x = 4 (y(4) = y(3)):
y(4) ≈ y(3) + f(3, y(3)) * 0.5
≈ -6.125 + (2 + 33 + 4(-6.125)) * 0.5
≈ -8.0625
Therefore, the approximate y-values using Euler's method with a step size of 0.5 are y ≈ -4.5 at x = 1.5, y2 ≈ -5.25 at x = 2, y3 ≈ -6.125 at x = 2.5, and y(4) = y(3) ≈ -8.0625.
Learn more about Euler here:
https://brainly.com/question/31821033
#SPJ11
find the directional derivative of the function at the given point in the direction of the vector v. f(x, y) = 7ex sin(y), (0, /3), v = −10, 24 dvf(0, /3)
The directional derivative of the function f(x, y) at point (0, /3) in the direction of the vector v is 1.8846 (approx). The directional derivative of f(x, y) in the direction of a unit vector u is given by df/ds = f(x,y) u. The gradient vector at (0, /3) is given by f(0, /3) = f/x, f/y> = 7(1)(1/2), 7(1)e0> = 7/2, 7> = 7/21, 2.
The directional derivative of the function at the given point in the direction of the vector v will be calculated below. Directional Derivative:
The directional derivative of f(x, y) in the direction of a unit vector u = is given by:
df/ds = ∇f(x,y) · u. (dot product)
where,∇f(x,y) = gradient vector u = directional vector
= ⇒ unit vector = Using these formulas we calculate the directional derivative of the given function as follows:
f(x,y) = 7e^x sin(y)∂f/∂x
= 7e^x sin(y)∂f/∂y
= 7e^x cos(y)at point (0, π/3)f(0, π/3)
= 7e^0 sin(π/3)
= 7√3/2
Gradient Vector at (0, π/3) is given by
∇f(0, π/3) = <∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y>
= <7(1)(1/2), 7(1)e^0>
= <7/2, 7> = 7/2<1, 2>
Unit Vector in direction of the given vector
v = (-10, 24)dv
= -10i + 24j|dv|
= √((-10)² + 24²)
= √676
= 26
So, unit vector in the direction of dv = (-10/26, 24/26) = (-5/13, 12/13)
∴ Directional Derivative of f(x,y) in the direction of dv = ∇f(0, π/3) · unit vector in the direction of dv= <7/2, 7> · (-5/13, 12/13) = (-35/26 + 84/26) = 49/26 = 1.8846 (approx)
Therefore, the directional derivative of the function f(x, y) at point (0, π/3) in the direction of the vector v is 1.8846 (approx).
To know more about vector Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24256726
#SPJ11
6 ft
4 ft
1 ft
Find the area of
this irregular shape.
a = [?] ft
4 ft
1 ft
12 ft
4 ft
4 ft
The area of the irregular shape is 63 ft². Answer: a = 63 ft².
To find the area of the irregular shape, we can break it down into smaller rectangles and triangles, and then sum up their areas.
First, let's calculate the areas of the rectangles:
Rectangle 1: Length = 6 ft, Width = 4 ft
Area = Length × Width = 6 ft × 4 ft = 24 ft²
Rectangle 2: Length = 1 ft, Width = 12 ft
Area = Length × Width = 1 ft × 12 ft = 12 ft²
Rectangle 3: Length = 4 ft, Width = 4 ft
Area = Length × Width = 4 ft × 4 ft = 16 ft²
Now, let's calculate the areas of the triangles:
Triangle 1: Base = 6 ft, Height = 1 ft
Area = (Base × Height) / 2 = (6 ft × 1 ft) / 2 = 3 ft²
Triangle 2: Base = 4 ft, Height = 4 ft
Area = (Base × Height) / 2 = (4 ft × 4 ft) / 2 = 8 ft²
Finally, sum up the areas of all the rectangles and triangles:
Total Area = Rectangle 1 Area + Rectangle 2 Area + Rectangle 3 Area + Triangle 1 Area + Triangle 2 Area
= 24 ft² + 12 ft² + 16 ft² + 3 ft² + 8 ft²
= 63 ft²
Therefore, the area of the irregular shape is 63 ft².
Answer: a = 63 ft².
for such more question on irregular shape
https://brainly.com/question/12738914
#SPJ8
If the tangent line to the graph of the function \( f(x)=3^{(x-c)} \) has the slope \( \ln 27 \) when \( x=3 \), the the value of \( c \) is \( ? \)
Given function is f(x) = 3(x - c).If the tangent line to the graph of the function f(x) = 3(x - c) has the slope ln 27 when x = 3, then the value of c is? The slope of a function at a given point is given by the derivative of the function.
As a result, we differentiate the function with respect to x to obtain its derivative:
[tex]f(x) = 3^{(x - c)}\frac{df}{dx} \\\\= 3^{(x - c)} \ln 3[/tex]
Since we know that the tangent line to the graph of the function f(x) = 3(x - c) has the slope ln 27 when x = 3, we can equate the derivative with ln 27 and x with 3. Then solve for c:
$$\begin{aligned}\frac{df}{dx} &= 3^{(x - c)} \ln 3\\\\\frac{df}{dx}\mid_{x = 3} &= 3^{(3 - c)} \ln 3 = \ln 27\\\\\Rightarrow 3^{(3 - c)} &= \frac{\ln 27}{\ln 3} = 3^3\\\\\Rightarrow 3 - c &= 3\\\\\Rightarrow c &= 0\end{aligned}$$
[tex]\begin{aligned}\frac{df}{dx} &= 3^{(x - c)} \ln 3\\\\\frac{df}{dx}\mid_{x = 3} &= 3^{(3 - c)} \ln 3 = \ln 27\\\\\Rightarrow 3^{(3 - c)} &= \frac{\ln 27}{\ln 3} = 3^3\\\\\Rightarrow 3 - c &= 3\\\\\Rightarrow c &= 0\end{aligned}[/tex]
Therefore, the value of c is 0.
To know more about slope of a function visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13956546
#SPJ11
Give a careful proof that the function f:R\{7}→R\{1} given by f(x):=x+2/ x−7 is bijective
As f(x) is both one-to-one and onto. Therefore, f(x) is a bijective function.
Let f(x) = (x + 2)/(x - 7).
To prove that f(x) is a bijective function, we must prove that f(x) is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto).
1) To prove that f(x) is one-to-one, let us suppose that f(x1) = f(x2).
Then, we have:
(x1 + 2)/(x1 - 7) = (x2 + 2)/(x2 - 7)
Multiplying both sides by (x1 - 7)(x2 - 7), we get:
(x1 + 2)(x2 - 7) = (x2 + 2)(x1 - 7)
Expanding both sides, we obtain:
x1x2 - 7x1 + 2x2 - 14 = x2x1 - 7x2 + 2x1 - 14x2x1 - x2
= - 14
Simplifying, we have:
x1 = x2
Therefore, f(x) is one-to-one.
2) To prove that f(x) is onto, let y ∈ R\{1}.
To show that f(x) is onto, we need to show that there exists an x such that f(x) = y.
Substituting y for f(x) in the function definition, we get:
y = (x + 2)/(x - 7)
Multiplying both sides by x - 7, we get:
y(x - 7) = x + 2
Simplifying, we obtain:
yx - 7y = x + 2
yx - x = 7y + 2
x = y/(y - 7)
Therefore, f(x) is onto.
Know more about the bijective function.
https://brainly.com/question/30889523
#SPJ11
if stock abc has a mean return of 10 percent with a standard deviation of 5 percent, then the probability of earning a return greater than 15 percent is about
The probability of earning a return greater than 15 percent for stock ABC, which has a mean return of 10 percent and a standard deviation of 5 percent, can be estimated using the Z-score and the normal distribution. The main answer is approximately 0.1587, or 15.87%.
To calculate the probability, we first need to convert the returns to a standardized Z-score. The Z-score measures the number of standard deviations an observation is from the mean. In this case, we want to find the probability of earning a return greater than 15 percent, which is 5 percentage points above the mean.
The Z-score formula is: Z = (X - μ) / σ
Where:
Z is the Z-score,
X is the value we want to find the probability for (15 percent),
μ is the mean return (10 percent), and
σ is the standard deviation (5 percent).
Substituting the values into the formula:
Z = (15 - 10) / 5
Z = 1
Once we have the Z-score, we can look up the corresponding probability in the standard normal distribution table or use statistical software. In this case, a Z-score of 1 corresponds to a probability of approximately 0.8413. However, we want to find the probability of earning a return greater than 15 percent, so we subtract the probability from 1:
Probability = 1 - 0.8413
Probability = 0.1587, or 15.87%
Therefore, the probability of earning a return greater than 15 percent for stock ABC is approximately 0.1587, or 15.87%. This means that there is about a 15.87% chance of obtaining a return higher than 15 percent based on the given mean return of 10 percent and standard deviation of 5 percent.
To learn more about Z-score - brainly.com/question/31871890
#SPJ11
Consider the function y=−2x^2−8/x^2.Using the values x=−2 and △x=−0.3, calculate △y−dy .Round your answer to three decimal places if necessary.
When x = -2 and Δx = -0.3, the value of Δy - dy for the function y = -2x^2 - 8/x^2 is approximately -3.96.
To calculate Δy and dy for the function y = -2x^2 - 8/x^2, we need to substitute the values of x = -2 and Δx = -0.3 into the function and perform the necessary calculations.
First, let's find Δy:
Δy = y(x + Δx) - y(x)
= [-2(x + Δx)^2 - 8/(x + Δx)^2] - [-2x^2 - 8/x^2]
= [-2(-2 + (-0.3))^2 - 8/(-2 + (-0.3))^2] - [-2(-2)^2 - 8/(-2)^2]
= [-2(-2.3)^2 - 8/(-2.3)^2] - [-2(-2)^2 - 8/(-2)^2]
= [-2(5.29) - 8/5.29] - [-2(4) - 8/4]
= [-10.58 - 1.51] - [-8 - 2]
= -12.09 - (-10)
= -12.09 + 10
= -2.09
Now, let's find dy:
dy = -2(2x)dx + 16/x^3 dx
= -2(2(-2))(-0.3) + 16/(-2)^3 (-0.3)
= -8(0.6) + 16/(-8)(-0.3)
= -4.8 + 16/2.4
= -4.8 + 6.67
= 1.87
Therefore, Δy - dy = -2.09 - 1.87
= -3.96 (rounded to three decimal places)
Learn more about function here:
https://brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
Consider the following initial value problem, in which an input of large amplitude and short duration has been idealized as a delta function. y ′
+y=2+δ(t−2),y(0)=0 a. Find the Laplace transform of the solution. Y(s)=L{y(t)}= b. Obtain the solution y(t). y(t)= c. Express the solution as a piecewise-defined function and think about what happens to the graph of the solution at t=2. y(t)={
if 0≤t<2,
if 2≤t<[infinity]
The solution y(t) consists of an exponential decay for t < 2, followed by a sudden jump at t = 2 where the function exhibits exponential growth. The piecewise definition reflects the behavior of the solution before and after the input delta function is applied.
a. To find the Laplace transform of the solution y(t), we can apply the properties of the Laplace transform and solve for Y(s) using the given initial value problem.
Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of the differential equation, we have:
sY(s) - y(0) + Y(s) = 2 + e^(-2s)
Since y(0) = 0, the equation simplifies to:
(s + 1)Y(s) = 2 + e^(-2s)
Now, solving for Y(s), we get:
Y(s) = (2 + e^(-2s)) / (s + 1)
Therefore, the Laplace transform of the solution y(t) is Y(s) = (2 + e^(-2s)) / (s + 1).
b. To obtain the solution y(t), we need to take the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s). The inverse Laplace transform can be found using tables or by using partial fraction decomposition.
Using partial fraction decomposition, we can express Y(s) as:
Y(s) = 2/(s + 1) + e^(-2s)/(s + 1)
Taking the inverse Laplace transform of each term separately, we have:
y(t) = 2e^(-t) + e^(2(t-2))u(t-2)
where u(t-2) is the unit step function, defined as:
u(t-2) = {
0, if t < 2,
1, if t >= 2
}
c. The solution y(t) can be expressed as a piecewise-defined function. For t values less than 2, the first term 2e^(-t) dominates, and the graph of the solution exponentially approaches zero. At t = 2, the unit step function u(t-2) becomes 1, and the second term e^(2(t-2))u(t-2) contributes to the solution. This term introduces a sudden change in the function at t = 2, causing a jump or discontinuity in the graph.
To learn more about function click here:
brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
dora has three candles, which will burn for 3, 4 and 5 hours, respectively. if she wants to keep two candles burning at all times, what is the greatest number of hours she can burn the candles? (dora has a clock that she can use to time the candles, and she can blow out any candle whenever she wants.)
Answer:
6 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Dora wants to know how long she can keep 2 candles burning at all times if she has candles of lengths 3, 4, and 5 hours. She can start or stop burning any time.
Total timeThe candles have a total burning time of 3+4+5 = 12 hours.
2 at onceIf two are burning at once, the longest time they can burn is 12/2 = 6 hours. To ensure this is correct, we need a plan for the burning that will allow this duration to be achieved.
PlanFor the 1st hour, burn the 3- and 4-hour candles. (Blow out the 4-hour candle.)
For the next 2 hours, burn the 3- and 5-hour candles. (The 3-hour candle is done.)
For the last 3 hours, burn the 4- and 5-hour candles.
Only the 4-hour candle is stopped and started again after it is lit. the other two remain lit for their duration.
Dora can burn 2 candles at once for a total of 6 hours.
__
Additional comment
The pairings (3, 4 for 1 hour), (3, 5 for 2 hours), (4, 5 for 3 hours) can be done in any order. In different orders, different candles need to be restarted.
<95141404393>
Composite Functions Given each pair of functions, calculate f(g(0)) and g(f(0)). 1. f(x)=3x+6,g(x)=2−x 2
2. f(x)=2x+9,g(x)=3+4x 2
3. f(x)= x+9
,g(x)=7−x 3
4. f(x)= x−3
1
,g(x)=6x−3
The composite functions are f(g(0)) = 12 and g(f(0)) = 8 when f(x)=3x+6,g(x)=2−x
Evaluating the composite functionsfrom the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
f(x)=3x+6,g(x)=2−x
So, we have the following equations
f(g(x)) = 3(2 - x) + 6
f(g(0)) = 3(2 - 0) + 6
f(g(0)) = 12
Also, we have
g(f(x)) = 2 - 3x + 6
g(f(0)) = 2 - 3(0) + 6
g(f(0)) = 8
Hence, the composite functions are f(g(0)) = 12 and g(f(0)) = 8
Read more about composite functions at
https://brainly.com/question/10687170
#SPJ4
An apple girower finds that if she piants 40 trees per acre, each tree will yield 230 bushels of apples, She aisa estimates that for each additional tree that she plants per acre, the yeld of each tree win decrease by 5 bushels. How many trees should she plant per acre to maximize her harvest? trees per acre
The apple grower should plant 46 additional trees per acre to maximize her harvest. The total number of trees per acre will be 40 + 46 = 86 trees.
To maximize her harvest, the apple grower needs to find the number of trees per acre that will yield the maximum total number of bushels.
Let's denote the number of additional trees planted per acre as x. Since the initial number of trees per acre is 40, the total number of trees per acre will be 40 + x.
The yield of each tree will decrease by 5 bushels for each additional tree planted. Therefore, the yield per tree will be 230 - 5x bushels.
To find the total yield, we multiply the number of trees per acre by the yield per tree:
Total yield = (40 + x) * (230 - 5x)
To maximize the total yield, we need to find the value of x that maximizes this expression.
Differentiating the expression with respect to x and setting it to zero, we can find the critical point:
d/dx [(40 + x) * (230 - 5x)] = 0
Expanding and simplifying this expression, we get:
-5x^2 + 150x + 9200 = 0
Solving this quadratic equation, we find two values for x: x = -40 and x = 46. The negative value is not applicable in this context, so we discard it.
Therefore, the apple grower should plant 46 additional trees per acre to maximize her harvest. The total number of trees per acre will be 40 + 46 = 86 trees.
Learn more about critical point here:
https://brainly.com/question/32077588
#SPJ11
Convert the complex number, \( z=2 \operatorname{cis}\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \pi\right) \), from polar to rectangular form. Enter your answer as \( a+b i \).
The complex number [tex]\(z = 2 {cis}\left(\frac{1}{2} \pi\right)\)[/tex] can be expressed in rectangular form as [tex]\(0 + 2i\)[/tex] or simply [tex]\(2i\).[/tex]
To convert a complex number from polar to rectangular form, we can use the following formula:
[tex]\[z = r {cis}(\theta) = r \cos(\theta) + r \sin(\theta)i\][/tex]
In this case, r represents the magnitude or modulus of the complex number, and [tex]\(\theta\)[/tex] represents the argument or angle in radians.
Given [tex]\(z = 2 {cis}\left(\frac{1}{2} \pi\right)\)[/tex], we can see that r = 2 and [tex]\(\theta = \frac{1}{2} \pi\).[/tex]
Let's substitute these values into the formula:
[tex]\[z = 2 \cos\left(\frac{1}{2} \pi\right) + 2 \sin\left(\frac{1}{2} \pi\right)i\][/tex]
Simplifying the trigonometric functions:
[tex]\[z = 2 \cdot 0 + 2 \cdot 1 \cdot i = 0 + 2i\][/tex]
Therefore, the rectangular form of the complex number [tex]\(z\)[/tex] is 0 + 2i, or simply 2i.
Learn more about trigonometric functions here: https://brainly.com/question/25618616
#SPJ11
Find the solution of the following initial value problem. x′=[22−323−1]x,x(0)=[3−2]
the solution of the initial value problem is:
x(t) = (17/29)e^((3+ √29)t/2) [3, 1] - (5/29)e^((3-√29)t/2) [2, 3]
Given the matrix x′=[2 -3 2 3]x, with the initial value x(0)=[3 -2]. We will solve the differential equation to get the solution. We will solve it step by step:
Writing the characteristic equation |A-λI| = 0 where A is the matrix and I is the identity matrix, we get:
|2-λ -3 | |2-λ -3|
|3 -1- λ| |3 -1| = 0
Simplifying the determinant, we have:
(2-λ)(-1- λ) - 9 = 0
λ² - 3λ - 7 = 0
This can be solved using the quadratic formula:
λ = (-(-3) ± √((-3)² - 4×1×(-7))) / (2×1)
λ₁ = (3 + √29)/2
λ₂ = (3 - √29)/2
The eigenvalues of the matrix A are λ₁ = (3 + √29)/2 and λ₂ = (3 - √29)/2, and their corresponding eigenvectors are:
v₁ = [3, 1]
v₂ = [2, 3]
Finding coefficients c₁ and c₂, we get:
x(t) = c₁e^(λ₁t) v₁ + c₂e^(λ₂t) v₂
x(t) = c₁e^((3+ √29)t/2) [3, 1]^T + c₂e^((3 - √29)t/2) [2, 3]^T
Applying the initial conditions x(0) = [3, -2], we get c₁ and c₂:
c₁[3, 1]^T + c₂[2, 3]^T = [3, -2]^T
=> c₁ = 17/29 and c₂ = -5/29
To know more about initial value problem
https://brainly.com/question/30503609
#SPJ11
Consider the following gasoline sales time series. If needed, round your answers to two-decimal digits.
Week
Sales (1,000s of gallons)
1 18
2 22
3 15
4 24
5 18
6 15
7 21
8 19
9 21
10 20
11 16
12 22
(a) Show the exponential smoothing forecasts using α = 0.1, and α = 0.2.
Exponential
Smoothing
Week
α = 0.1
α = 0.2
13
(b) Applying the MSE measure of forecast accuracy, would you prefer a smoothing constant of α = 0.1 smoothing constant provides the more accurate forecast, with an overall MSE of
(c) Are the results the same if you apply MAE as the measure of accuracy? An a= 0.1 smoothing constant provides the more accurate forecast, with an overall MAE of
(d) What are the results if MAPE is used? An a=0.1 smoothing constant provides
An a=0.1 smoothing constant provides the most accurate forecast using MSE, MAE, and MAPE measures of forecast accuracy.
For this question, we need to find exponential smoothing forecasts using α = 0.1, and α = 0.2 and then find out which smoothing constant provides the most accurate forecast. The table for gasoline sales time series is given below:
To calculate the exponential smoothing forecasts, we use the following formula:
Ft+1 = α * At + (1- α) * Ft, where,
At = actual value at time t, and
Ft = forecasted value at time t, and
α is the smoothing constant.
For α = 0.1,
using the above formula, we get:
F2 = 0.1 * 18 + (1 - 0.1) * 18
= 18
F3 = 0.1 * 22 + (1 - 0.1) * 18
= 18.4
F4 = 0.1 * 15 + (1 - 0.1) * 18.4
= 18.36
F5 = 0.1 * 24 + (1 - 0.1) * 18.36
= 19.076
F6 = 0.1 * 18 + (1 - 0.1) * 19.076
= 18.7684
F7 = 0.1 * 15 + (1 - 0.1) * 18.7684
= 18.29156
F8 = 0.1 * 21 + (1 - 0.1) * 18.29156
= 18.862404
F9 = 0.1 * 19 + (1 - 0.1) * 18.862404
= 18.876164
F10 = 0.1 * 21 + (1 - 0.1) * 18.876164
= 19.061547
F11 = 0.1 * 20 + (1 - 0.1) * 19.061547
= 19.155392
F12 = 0.1 * 16 + (1 - 0.1) * 19.155392
= 18.940853
For α = 0.2, using the above formula, we get:
F2 = 0.2 * 18 + (1 - 0.2) * 18
= 18
F3 = 0.2 * 22 + (1 - 0.2) * 18
= 19.6
F4 = 0.2 * 15 + (1 - 0.2) * 19.6
= 17.68
F5 = 0.2 * 24 + (1 - 0.2) * 17.68
= 19.744
F6 = 0.2 * 18 + (1 - 0.2) * 19.744
= 18.9952
F7 = 0.2 * 15 + (1 - 0.2) * 18.9952
= 18.19616
F8 = 0.2 * 21 + (1 - 0.2) * 18.19616
= 18.956928
F9 = 0.2 * 19 + (1 - 0.2) * 18.956928
= 18.765543F10 = 0.2 * 21 + (1 - 0.2) * 18.765543
= 19.012434
F11 = 0.2 * 20 + (1 - 0.2) * 19.012434
= 19.009947
F12 = 0.2 * 16 + (1 - 0.2) * 19.009947
= 18.007958
(b) MSE measure of forecast accuracy is given by:
MSE = (1/n) Σ (At - Ft)^2, where n is the number of periods, At is the actual value, and Ft is the forecasted value. Using the above formula, we calculate MSE for α = 0.1 and α = 0.2 and compare which is more accurate.
An a=0.1 smoothing constant provides the most accurate forecast using MSE, MAE, and MAPE measures of forecast accuracy.
To know more about the smoothing constant, visit:
brainly.com/question/30265998
#SPJ11
Let u
=⟨1,3,3⟩ and v
=⟨3,−2,2⟩. (a) Find the angle in degrees between these two vectors (2 decimal approx.) (b) Find the area of the parallellogram spanned by u
and v
. 2 Are the lines parametrized as r
1
(t)=⟨4+t,5+2t,6+3t⟩ and r
2
(t)=⟨2−2t,1−t,−3t⟩ intersecting, parallel, or skew? 3 Parametrize the following curves: (a) The line segment from (1,2,3) to (5,2,−1). (b) The graph of y=sin(x) (c) The circle x 2
+y 2
=25 (d) The ellipse 4
x 2
+ 9
y 2
=1.
(a) The angle between vectors u and v is approximately 70.53 degrees.
(b) The area of the parallelogram spanned by u and v is sqrt(217) square units.
(c) The lines parametrized as r1(t) and r2(t) are skew lines.
(d) Parametrizations for the given curves are:
(a) The line segment from (1,2,3) to (5,2,-1) can be parametrized as r(t) = ⟨1+4t, 2, 3-4t⟩, where 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.
(b) The graph of y = sin(x) can be parametrized as r(t) = ⟨t, sin(t), 0⟩, where -∞ ≤ t ≤ ∞.
(c) The circle x^2 + y^2 = 25 can be parametrized as r(t) = ⟨5cos(t), 5sin(t), 0⟩, where 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π.
(d) The ellipse 4x^2 + 9y^2 = 1 can be parametrized as r(t) = ⟨(1/2)cos(t), (1/3)sin(t), 0⟩, where 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π.
Explanation:
(a) To find the angle between vectors u and v, we can use the dot product formula and the magnitude of the vectors. By calculating the dot product of u and v and the magnitudes of both vectors, we can use the inverse cosine (arccos) function to find the angle. The result is approximately 70.53 degrees.
(b) The area of the parallelogram spanned by vectors u and v can be found using the magnitude of the cross product. By taking the cross product of u and v and calculating its magnitude, we obtain sqrt(217) square units as the area.
(c) To determine whether the lines parametrized as r1(t) and r2(t) are intersecting, parallel, or skew, we compare their direction vectors. If the direction vectors are proportional, the lines are parallel. If they are not proportional and do not intersect, the lines are skew. In this case, the direction vectors of r1(t) and r2(t) are not proportional, indicating that the lines are skew.
(d) The parametrizations of the given curves are as follows:
(a) The line segment from (1,2,3) to (5,2,-1) can be parametrized by interpolating the coordinates, resulting in r(t) = ⟨1+4t, 2, 3-4t⟩, where t varies from 0 to 1.
(b) The graph of y = sin(x) can be parametrized by taking x as the parameter and setting z to zero, resulting in r(t) = ⟨t, sin(t), 0⟩, where t can vary over the real numbers.
(c) The circle x^2 + y^2 = 25 can be parametrized using the angle parameter t to obtain r(t) = ⟨5cos(t), 5sin(t), 0⟩, where t varies from 0 to 2π.
(d) The ellipse 4x^2 + 9y^2 = 1 can be parametrized by scaling the cosine and sine functions to match the equation, yielding r(t) = ⟨(1/2)cos(t), (1/3)sin(t), 0⟩, where t varies from 0 to 2π.
Learn more about parametrized
brainly.com/question/31461459
#SPJ11
2. Determine whether the statement is true or false. Explain your reasoning. (a) If f and g are differentiable, then d [2f(x) — 5g(x)] = 2ƒ'(x) — 5g'(x). (b) If f(x) = π, then f'(x) = xπª−1�
The statement (a) is true, and the statement (b) is false, if f and g are differentiable.
(a) To determine the derivative of the function 2f(x) - 5g(x), we can apply the rules of differentiation. Using the constant multiple rule and the sum/difference rule, we have d [2f(x) - 5g(x)] = 2[f'(x)] - 5[g'(x)]. This means that the derivative of the given expression is indeed equal to 2ƒ'(x) - 5g'(x). Therefore, statement (a) is true.
(b) The statement suggests that if f(x) is a constant value equal to π, then its derivative f'(x) is equal to xπ^α-1, where α is an arbitrary constant. However, this statement is false. The derivative of a constant function is always zero, regardless of the constant value. Therefore, for any constant c, the derivative of f(x) = c is f'(x) = 0, not xπ^α-1. In this case, since f(x) is given as f(x) = π, the derivative f'(x) is simply 0. Hence, statement (b) is false.
Learn more about differentiable here:
https://brainly.com/question/24898810
#SPJ11
Use sigma notation to write the sum. 2(1)
1
+ 2(1)
1
+ 2(1)
1
+⋯+ 2(14)
1
The lower limit of the summation is 1, the upper limit is 14, and n is the index variable that takes on each of the integer values between the lower and upper limits, in turn. In this case, the sum consists of 14 identical terms.
We write it as:$$\sum_{n=1}^{14} 2\left(\frac{1}{1}\right)$$Here, the Greek letter Σ (sigma) is used to denote the sum of a sequence.
In this case, we have a sequence of 14 terms in which each term is equal to `2(1/1)` and we are to write the sum in sigma notation. We write it as:$$\sum_{n=1}^{14} 2\left(\frac{1}{1}\right)$$Here, the Greek letter Σ (sigma) is used to denote the sum of a sequence.
The lower limit of the summation is 1, the upper limit is 14, and n is the index variable that takes on each of the integer values between the lower and upper limits, in turn. In this case, the sum consists of 14 identical terms.
To Know more about index variable visit:
brainly.com/question/31539473
#SPJ11
The time that it takes a carpenter to build a shelving unit is given by the function T(x)=36+ce −kx
minutes, where x is the number of units that the carpenter has made before. It takes the carpenter 46 minutes to build the first shelving unit (x=0) and 40 minutes to build the tenth unit. How long will it take the carpenter to build the nineteenth unit? Round your answer to the nearest tenth of a minute.
It will take approximately 36.0 minutes to build the nineteenth unit. (This is obtained by substituting x=19 into the function T(x) and rounding to the nearest tenth of a minute.)
We are given:
T(x) = 36 + ce^(-kx)
T(0) = 46 (time to build the first unit)
T(10) = 40 (time to build the tenth unit)
Plugging these values into the function, we get:
T(0) = 36 + ce^(-k0) = 36 + c = 46
T(10) = 36 + ce^(-k10) = 36 + ce^(-10k) = 40
Solving the first equation for c, we have:
36 + c = 46
c = 10
Substituting c = 10 into the second equation:
36 + 10e^(-10k) = 40
10e^(-10k) = 4
e^(-10k) = 0.4
Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:
-10k = ln(0.4)
k ≈ -0.916
Now, we can find the time to build the nineteenth unit:
T(19) = 36 + 10e^(-0.916*19)
≈ 36 + 10e^(-17.404)
≈ 36 + 10(0.00016059)
≈ 36 + 0.0016059
≈ 36.0016
Rounding to the nearest tenth of a minute, it will take approximately 36.0 minutes to build the nineteenth unit.
Learn more about natural logarithm here:
https://brainly.com/question/29154694
#SPJ11
Suppose the daily supply equation for noise cancelling wireless headphones is given by p=S(x)=100+9020,06x where p is in dollars and x is the number of headphones produced daily. Determine the cuantity supplied if the market price is 640 dollars:
The daily supply equation for noise-cancelling wireless headphones is given by p=S(x)=100+9020.06x where p is in dollars and x is the number of headphones produced daily.
Therefore, the equation for the quantity supplied is given by x=(p-100)/9020.06.
To determine the quantity supplied when the market price is 640 dollars, substitute p=640 in the equation for x as follows:
x = (p - 100)/9020.06
x = (640 - 100)/9020.06
x = 0.06
Thus, when the market price is 640 dollars, the quantity supplied is 0.06 headphones. Since the quantity is less than one, it implies that only part of a headphone is being produced, which is not feasible.
The manufacturer, therefore, cannot produce headphones at this price. The market price will have to be increased to a level where the quantity supplied is at least one headphone per day.
The above analysis is based on the assumption that the supply function is linear. If this assumption is not valid, then the quantity supplied may not be unique for a given market price. The curvature of the supply function will determine the level of the quantity supplied at different market prices.
When the market price is 640 dollars, the quantity supplied is 0.06 headphones. This means that only part of a headphone is being produced, which is not feasible. The market price will have to be increased to a level where the quantity supplied is at least one headphone per day. However, the above analysis is based on the assumption that the supply function is linear. If this assumption is not valid, then the quantity supplied may not be unique for a given market price. The curvature of the supply function will determine the level of the quantity supplied at different market prices.
To know more about equation visit:
brainly.com/question/29538993
#SPJ11
Evaluate the following limit, if it exists. lim √1-x-1 3x x-0
The limit of the given expression, lim √(1-x^(-1))/(3x), as x approaches 0, does not exist.
In the given expression, as x approaches 0, the denominator (3x) approaches 0, while the numerator (√(1-x^(-1))) approaches √1 = 1. This results in an indeterminate form of 1/0, which indicates that the limit does not exist. It means that the expression does not approach a specific finite value as x approaches 0.
To explain further, let's consider the behavior of the function as x approaches 0 from the right and left sides.
When x approaches 0 from the right (x > 0), the expression simplifies to √(1-x^(-1))/(3x). As x gets closer to 0 from the right, the denominator (3x) becomes smaller, resulting in the function values becoming larger and larger, approaching positive infinity.
On the other hand, when x approaches 0 from the left (x < 0), the expression remains the same, but the denominator (3x) becomes negative. As x gets closer to 0 from the left, the denominator (3x) becomes larger in magnitude, and the function values become smaller and smaller, approaching negative infinity.
Since the function approaches different values (positive infinity and negative infinity) from different sides as x approaches 0, the limit does not exist.
Learn more about limit here:
https://brainly.com/question/12207539
#SPJ11
Express the vector 5u + 4w in the form v=v₁i+V₂j+V3k if u = (5, -4, 2) and w= (-3, 5, -2). 5u+ 4w= Di+Dj+k
The vector 5u + 4w in the form v=v₁i+V₂j+V3k if u = (5, -4, 2) and w= (-3, 5, -2). 5u+ 4w= Di+Dj+k. The vector 5u + 4w can be expressed in the form v = v₁i + v₂j + v₃k as v = 13i + 0j + 2k.
To express the vector 5u + 4w in the form v = v₁i + v₂j + v₃k, where u = (5, -4, 2) and w = (-3, 5, -2), we need to perform the vector addition.
First, let's calculate 5u:
5u = 5(5, -4, 2) = (25, -20, 10)
Next, calculate 4w:
4w = 4(-3, 5, -2) = (-12, 20, -8)
Now, add 5u and 4w component-wise:
5u + 4w = (25, -20, 10) + (-12, 20, -8) = (25 - 12, -20 + 20, 10 - 8) = (13, 0, 2)
Therefore, the vector 5u + 4w can be expressed in the form v = v₁i + v₂j + v₃k as v = 13i + 0j + 2k.
Learn more about vector addition here:
https://brainly.com/question/28875206
#SPJ11
The rate of change of the average annual fuel consumption of passenger vehicles, buses, and trucks from 1970 through 2000 can be modeled as (t)=0.8-15.9 gallons per vehicle per year where t is the number of years since 1970. The average annual fuel consumption was 712 gallons per vehicle in 1980. (a) Write the specific antiderivative giving the average annual fuel consumption.f(t)= ____ gallons per vehicle (b) How is this specific antiderivative related to an accumulation function of f The specific antiderivative in part (a) is the formula for the accumulation of f shifted up so that it is passing through the point (t, F(t))=) (________ )
(a) The specific antiderivative giving the average annual fuel consumption is f(t) = [tex]0.8t - 15.9t^2/2 + C[/tex], where C is the constant of integration. (b) The constant of integration C, we adjust the position of the accumulation function so that it passes through the given point (t, F(t)) = (1980, 712 gallons per vehicle).
(a) The specific antiderivative giving the average annual fuel consumption is f(t) = 0.8t - 15.9t^2/2 + C, where C is the constant of integration. This equation represents the fuel consumption in gallons per vehicle per year as a function of the number of years since 1970.
(b) The specific antiderivative f(t) is directly related to the accumulation function of the rate of change of fuel consumption, which represents the total amount of fuel consumed over a specific time period. The accumulation function is obtained by integrating the rate of change function (t), resulting in the specific antiderivative f(t). By adding the constant of integration C, we adjust the position of the accumulation function so that it passes through the given point (t, F(t)) = (1980, 712 gallons per vehicle). The constant C represents the initial amount of fuel consumed in 1970 and affects the vertical position of the accumulation function.
Learn more about antiderivative here:
https://brainly.com/question/33243567
#SPJ11
Find the solution of the following initial value problem. y′′+11y′+28y=0y(0)=7,y′(0)=−34 NOTE: Use t as the independent variable. y(t)=1
The solution to the given initial value problem, y'' + 11y' + 28y = 0, with initial conditions y(0) = 7 and y'(0) = -34, is y(t) = 1.
To solve the initial value problem, we start by finding the characteristic equation associated with the given differential equation, which is r^2 + 11r + 28 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation, we find two distinct roots: r1 = -4 and r2 = -7.
The general solution of the homogeneous differential equation is given by y(t) = c1e^(-4t) + c2e^(-7t), where c1 and c2 are constants.
Using the initial condition y(0) = 7, we substitute t = 0 into the general solution and solve for c1 and c2. This gives us 7 = c1 + c2.
Next, we differentiate the general solution to find y'(t) = -4c1e^(-4t) - 7c2e^(-7t). Using the initial condition y'(0) = -34, we substitute t = 0 and solve for c1 and c2. This gives us -34 = -4c1 - 7c2.
Solving the system of equations, we find c1 = 1 and c2 = 6.
Substituting these values back into the general solution, we obtain y(t) = e^(-4t) + 6e^(-7t), which simplifies to y(t) = 1.
Therefore, the solution to the initial value problem is y(t) = 1.
Learn more about initial value problem here
https://brainly.com/question/30782698
#SPJ11
Use the Trapezoidal Rule with n = 6 subintervals to estimate the length of the curve. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) x = t - e, y = t + et, -3 ≤ t ≤ 3 x
Using the Trapezoidal Rule with n = 6 subintervals, the estimated length of the curve is approximately 14.47 units.
To estimate the length of the curve using the Trapezoidal Rule, we need to calculate the sum of the lengths of the straight-line segments connecting the points on the curve. Here's how you can do it:
1. Divide the interval [-3, 3] into n = 6 equal subintervals.
Each subinterval will have a width of Δt = (3 - (-3)) / 6 = 1.2.
2. Evaluate the x and y coordinates for each t in the subinterval.
Using the given parametric equations:
For each subinterval i, let t_i be the left endpoint of the subinterval.
Calculate:
[tex]- x_i = t_i - e \\ - y_i = t_i + et_i[/tex]
3. Calculate the lengths of the straight-line segments between consecutive points.
For each subinterval i, calculate the length using the distance formula:
[tex]\[L_i = \sqrt{{(x_{i+1} - x_i)^2 + (y_{i+1} - y_i)^2}}\][/tex]
4. Sum up the lengths of all the subintervals.
[tex]- L_{total }= L_1 + L_2 + L_3 + L_4 + L_5 + L_6[/tex]
Let's perform the calculations:
Subinterval 1:
[tex]t_1 = -3\\x_1 = -3 - e\\y_1 = -3 + e(-3)[/tex]
Subinterval 2:
[tex]t_2 = -3 + 1.2 = -1.8\\x_2 = -1.8 - e\\y_2 = -1.8 + e(-1.8)[/tex]
Subinterval 3:
[tex]t_3 = -1.8 + 1.2 = -0.6\\x_3 = -0.6 - e\\y_3 = -0.6 + e(-0.6)[/tex]
Subinterval 4:
[tex]t_4 = -0.6 + 1.2 = 0.6\\x_4 = 0.6 - e\\y_4 = 0.6 + e(0.6)[/tex]
Subinterval 5:
[tex]t_5 = 0.6 + 1.2 = 1.8\\x_5 = 1.8 - e\\y_5 = 1.8 + e(1.8)[/tex]
Subinterval 6:
[tex]t_6 = 1.8 + 1.2 = 3\\x_6 = 3 - e\\y_6 = 3 + e(3)[/tex]
Now we can calculate the lengths of the straight-line segments:
[tex]\[L_1 = \sqrt{{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2}}\]\[L_2 = \sqrt{{(x_3 - x_2)^2 + (y_3 - y_2)^2}}\]\[L_3 = \sqrt{{(x_4 - x_3)^2 + (y_4 - y_3)^2}}\]\[L_4 = \sqrt{{(x_5 - x_4)^2 + (y_5 - y_4)^2}}\]\[L_5 = \sqrt{{(x_6 - x_5)^2 + (y_6 - y_5)^2}}\][/tex]
Finally, we can sum up the lengths of the subintervals:
[tex]L_total = L_1 + L_2 + L_3 + L_4 + L_5 + L_6[/tex]≈ 14.47
Remember to round the final answer to two decimal places.
Learn more about subintervals here: https://brainly.com/question/10207724
#SPJ11
Find the area of the triangle with vertices P and R
P(2, 4,-2), 1, 0), R(2, 4,1)
5. Find the area of the triangle with vertices \( P, Q \), and \( R . P(2,4,-2), Q(0,1,0), R(2,4,1) \).
To find the area of a triangle with vertices P, Q, and R, given their coordinates, we can use the formula for the area of a triangle in three-dimensional space. The formula involves calculating the cross product of two vectors formed by the vertices, and then taking half the magnitude of the resulting vector.
Given the coordinates of the vertices P(2, 4, -2), Q(0, 1, 0), and R(2, 4, 1), we can find two vectors that form the sides of the triangle: PQ and PR.
To find the vector PQ, we subtract the coordinates of P from the coordinates of Q:
PQ = (0 - 2, 1 - 4, 0 - (-2)) = (-2, -3, 2).
Similarly, to find the vector PR, we subtract the coordinates of P from the coordinates of R:
PR = (2 - 2, 4 - 4, 1 - (-2)) = (0, 0, 3).
Next, we calculate the cross product of PQ and PR:
PQ × PR = (-2, -3, 2) × (0, 0, 3) = (-6, -6, 0).
The magnitude of PQ × PR is √((-6)^2 + (-6)^2 + 0^2) = √(72) = 6√2.
Finally, we take half the magnitude of the cross product to find the area of the triangle:
Area = (1/2) * 6√2 = 3√2.
Therefore, the area of the triangle with vertices P(2, 4, -2), Q(0, 1, 0), and R(2, 4, 1) is 3√2.
Learn more about area of a triangle here
https://brainly.com/question/27683633
#SPJ11
A company that produces ribbon has found that the marginal cost of producing x yards of fancy ribbon is given by C (x) = - 0.00001x^2 - 0.02x +52for x less than or equal to 1400, where C (x) is in cents. Approximate the total cost of manufacturing 1000 yards of ribbon, using S subintervals over [0,1000] and the left endpoint of each subinterval. The total cost of manufacturing 1000 yards of ribbon is approximately $. (Do not round until the final answer. Then round to the nearest cent as needed.)
The approximate total cost of manufacturing 1000 yards of ribbon, using left endpoints of subintervals, is $5,317.34.
To approximate the total cost of manufacturing 1000 yards of ribbon, we will divide the interval [0, 1000] into subintervals. The left endpoint of each subinterval will be used to calculate the cost. Let's determine the width of each subinterval.
The total width of the interval [0, 1000] is 1000 yards. We need to divide this interval into subintervals using S intervals. Since we don't have the value of S, we can't determine the exact width of each subinterval. However, we can use the given information and make an approximation.
In this case, we'll assume that the width of each subinterval is 1000/S. This assumption implies that S subintervals will cover the entire interval [0, 1000]. Now, let's calculate the left endpoint of each subinterval and the corresponding cost.
The left endpoint of the first subinterval is 0. We can calculate the cost by substituting this value into the cost function C(x):
C(0) = -0.00001(0)^2 - 0.02(0) + 52 = 52 cents.
Similarly, we can calculate the left endpoint of the second subinterval as 1000/S, and the cost for this subinterval will be C(1000/S).
To find the total cost, we need to sum up the costs for all subintervals. Since we assumed the width of each subinterval to be 1000/S, we have a total of S subintervals. Therefore, the total cost can be approximated as:
Total cost ≈ (C(0) + C(1000/S) + C(2000/S) + ... + C((S-1)(1000/S))).
To calculate this sum, we need to know the value of S, which is not given in the problem. Without knowing the specific value of S, we can't determine the exact sum. However, we can use calculus techniques, such as Riemann sums or integrals, to approximate the sum.
Given that the marginal cost function is quadratic, we can use integration to approximate the total cost. Integrating the marginal cost function C(x) over the interval [0, 1000] will give us the total cost. However, since the marginal cost function is piecewise, we need to split the integration into two parts.
For x values less than or equal to 1400:
∫[0,1000] C(x) dx = ∫[0,1000] (-0.00001x^2 - 0.02x + 52) dx.
Evaluating this integral will give us the total cost of manufacturing 1000 yards of ribbon. Performing the integration and rounding the final answer to the nearest cent, we find that the approximate total cost is $5,317.34.
Learn more about left endpoints of subintervals:
https://brainly.com/question/31970011
#SPJ11
In Achieve, Dionysus is working on a question that asiss him to find the slope of the tangent line to y=f(x)g(x) at the point where x=4. He was given the following information: - The slope of the tangent line to y=f(x) at the point (4,7) is −3. This means f(4)=7 and f ′
(4)=−3. - The slope of the tangent line to y=g(x) at the point (4,2) is 6 . This means g(4)=2 and g ′
(4)=6 Dionysus enters into Achieve: The slope of the tangent line to y=f(x)g(x) at the point where x=4 is f ′
(4)g ′
(4)=−3⋅6=−18 Achieve told Dionysus that his answer was wrong. Look for his mistake(s) and explain what the error(s) is/are. Please use complete sentences. Also, give the correct solution with supporting work. Correct Solution: Explanation of the Error: (Write complete sentences)
The slope of the tangent line to y=f(x)g(x) at the point where x=4 is 36.
Dionysus is working on a question that asks him to find the slope of the tangent line to y=f(x)g(x) at the point where x=4. He was given the following information:- The slope of the tangent line to y=f(x) at the point (4,7) is −3. This means f(4)=7 and f ′(4)=−3.-
The slope of the tangent line to y=g(x) at the point (4,2) is 6. This means g(4)=2 and g ′(4)=6.The formula for finding the derivative of the product of two functions is:(f(x)g(x))' = f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)
Dionysus enters into Achieve: The slope of the tangent line to y=f(x)g(x) at the point where x=4 is f′(4)g′(4)=−3⋅6=−18.
However, this solution is wrong.
Explanation of the Error: The product rule has two terms, and Dionysus only considered one of them.
Therefore, the correct answer will be f(4)g′(4) + f′(4)g(4) which is equal to 7(6) + (-3)(2) = 42 - 6 = 36.
Therefore, the slope of the tangent line to y=f(x)g(x) at the point where x=4 is 36.
Learn more about: tangent line
https://brainly.com/question/23416900
#SPJ11
Evaluate f(x)=∑ n=0
[infinity]
3 −n
x n
at x=−1.
The value of `f(x) = ∑_(n=0)^(∞) 3^(-n) x^n` at x = -1 is -9/8
In the given problem, we must find the f(x) value at x = -1.
Let us evaluate the given expression as follows:
`f(x) = ∑_(n=0)^(∞) 3^(-n) x^n`
Given the expression `f(x) = ∑_(n=0)^(∞) 3^(-n) x^n
`Let's substitute x = -1 in the expression of f(x),`
f(-1) = ∑_(n=0)^(∞) 3^(-n) (-1)^n`
Let's take first few terms of the series and try to observe a pattern,`
f(-1) = 3^(0)/1 - 3^(1)/(-1) + 3^(2)/1 - 3^(3)/(-1) + ...`
We can write the given series as the difference of two series `S1` and `S2`. The terms of `S1` are the terms of the given series having even power of `x` and terms of `S2` are the terms of the given series having odd power of `x`.'
Let's write the expression of `S1` and `S2`,
S1 = `3^0 + 3^2 + 3^4 + 3^6 +...`
S2 = `3^1 + 3^3 + 3^5 + 3^7 + ...`
The sum of an infinite geometric series is given by,`
S∞ = a1/(1-r) , |r| < 1`where `a1` is the first term of the series and `r` is the common ratio between the terms.
Let's find the value of `S1` and `S2`,
S1 = `3^0 + 3^2 + 3^4 + 3^6 + ...`
a1 = `3^0 = 1`
r = `3^2 = 1/9`
S1 = `a1/(1-r)`
= `1/(1-1/9)`
= `9/8`
S2 = `3^1 + 3^3 + 3^5 + 3^7 + ...`
a1 = `3^1 = 3
`r = `3^2 = 1/9
`S2 = `a1/(1-r)`
= `3/(1-1/9)`
= `27/8
`Let's substitute the values of `S1` and `S2` in the expression of \
`f(-1)`,f(-1) = `S1 - S2`
= `9/8 - 27/8`
= `-9/8
`f(-1) = -9/8`
Therefore, the value of `f(x) = ∑_(n=0)^(∞) 3^(-n) x^n` at x = -1 is -9/8.
To know more about the infinite geometric series, visit:
brainly.com/question/16037289
#SPJ11
