The earliest Opening-up policy in the listed options is granting Guangdong and Fujian flexible policies to encourage foreign trade and investment.
Answer: d. iii, ii, iv, i.
This policy was implemented in 1979. The next policy designated Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou and Xiamen as Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in 1980. In 1984, the Opened the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta and Southern Fujian Triangle Area policy was implemented.
Lastly, in 1992, the Opening 14 coastal port cities and Hainan Island policy was implemented.
Thus, the correct order of the above policies is iii, ii, iv, i.
To know more about Opening-up policy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/33495467
#SPJ4
The Question-
From the earliest to the latest, when did each of following Opening-up policies happen?
i). Opened the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta and Southern Fujian Triangle Area.
ii). Designated Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shanto and Xiamen as Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
iii). Granted Guangdong and Fujian flexible policies to encourage foreign trade and investment.
iv). Opened 14 coastal port cities and Hainan Island
Options-
a. i, ii, iii, iv
b. ii, iii. i, iv
c. iii, ii, i, iv
d. iii, ii, iv, i
Explain the significance of
• sedentary societies • Maya
• semisedentary societies • Inca
• nonsedentary societies • Aztec
• Mesoamerica • Pueblo
Sedentary societies are those in which people permanently settle in one place. They establish permanent structures and engage in agriculture to support their communities. The significance of sedentary societies is that they allow for the development of complex social, political, and economic systems.
The Maya were an ancient civilization in Mesoamerica known for their advanced knowledge in mathematics, astronomy, and writing. They built impressive cities with monumental architecture and were skilled in agriculture. The Maya had a hierarchical society with kings and priests playing key roles.
Semisedentary societies are those that combine elements of both sedentary and nonsedentary lifestyles. They have permanent settlements but also engage in nomadic activities such as herding. The Inca, an empire in South America, practiced semisedentary agriculture and herded llamas. They built a vast network of roads and had a centralized political structure.
Nonsedentary societies are those in which people move frequently in search of resources. The Aztec, a civilization in Mesoamerica, were known for their military prowess and extensive trade networks. They practiced agriculture but also engaged in hunting and gathering. The Aztec had a highly organized social and political system.
Mesoamerica refers to the region in Central America and Mexico where these civilizations thrived. It was a diverse area with various cultures and languages. Mesoamerica was a hub of cultural exchange and trade.
To know more about Sedentary visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30338375
#SPJ11
In classical Athens the reforms of established the basis for Athenian democracy. Olympiakos Pisistratus Hippias Cleisthenes What did Caesar Augustus do with the Senate after he "restored the republic"? he increased the power of individual senators who supported him he made his horse head consul of the Senate he disbanded the Senate altogether because it was of no use to him he kept the Senate in place All of the following are prominent features of Greece's topography (landscape) except for: valleys extensive open plains long seacoast mountains A building designed to express ideals of reason, moderation, symmetry, and balance; but in reality it mostly showed off wealth and power of Athens. A tactic used in Athens to remove leaders who had lost the people's confidence.
Answer:
The correct answers are:
- Cleisthenes established the basis for Athenian democracy.
- Caesar Augustus kept the Senate in place after he "restored the republic."
- Extensive open plains are not a prominent feature of Greece's topography.
- A building designed to express ideals of reason, moderation, symmetry, and balance; but in reality it mostly showed off wealth and power of Athens is a Greek temple, such as the Parthenon.
- Ostracism was a tactic used in Athens to remove leaders who had lost the people's confidence.
Note: Olympiakos is the name of a Greek football club and has no relevance to the question. Pisistratus and Hippias were both ancient Athenian tyrants, but they did not establish the basis for Athenian democracy.
Use the Terms & Names list to complete each sentence online or on your own paper.
A. Samuel de Champlain
B. Columbian Exchange
C. Treaty of Tordesillas
D. Bartolomé de Las Casas
E. plantations
F. encomienda
G. Jacques Cartier
H. Hernando Cortés
I. Amerigo Vespucci
J. racism
K. slavery
L. Francisco Pizarro
M. hacienda
N. middle passage
O. Spanish Armada
____ is a belief that some people are inferior because of their race.
Answer:
Racism is a belief that some people are inferior because of their race.
Which of the following is an argument a Social Darwinist might make about using government regulations to help the
poor and working classes?
O It is a fundamental function of government to provide a social safety net for those who are less fortunate.
O It should be up to individuals to decide whether or not to help the poor. Government shouldn't legislate it.
It is our duty to help those who cannot help themselves. What the poor need is religion and human dignity, along with some help
from the government.
The government should not directly intervene to help people. Our system relies on competition and allowing only the best of us to
succeed.
NEXT DUSTION
ASK FOR HELP
TURN IT IN
Answer:
A Social Darwinist is likely to argue that the government should not directly intervene to help the poor and working classes, as they believe in the survival of the fittest and competition as the driving forces of progress. They might argue that government regulations and social welfare programs interfere with the natural order of things and create a culture of dependency and entitlement. Therefore, the argument that a Social Darwinist might make is: "The government should not directly intervene to help people. Our system relies on competition and allowing only the best of us to succeed."
hich of the following most shaped the events described in the excerpt? the establishment of african slavery in the spanish colonies the establishment of african slavery in the spanish colonies the demands of the encomienda system in the spanish colonies the demands of the encomienda system in the spanish colonies the amount of spanish intermarriage with native americans the amount of spanish intermarriage with native americans the importance of old world crops to the subsistence of spanish colonial subjects
The establishment of African slavery in the Spanish colonies most shaped the events described in the excerpt. The introduction of African slaves was a significant factor that transformed the social and economic landscape of the colonies.
The option (A) is correct.
It led to the exploitation of labor, which was driven by the demands of the encomienda system. The encomienda system relied on forced labor from both Indigenous peoples and African slaves.
While Spanish intermarriage with Native Americans occurred to some extent, it did not have as profound an impact on the overall dynamics of colonial society as the institution of African slavery and the encomienda system.
Learn more about Spanish colonies:
https://brainly.com/question/30329600
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question.
Which of the following most shaped the events described in the excerpt?
(A) the establishment of african slavery in the spanish colonies .
(B) the demands of the encomienda system in the spanish colonies.
(C) the amount of spanish intermarriage with native americans.
(D) the importance of old world crops to the subsistence of spanish colonial subjects.
Explain the importance of
• Wilmot Proviso • Fugitive Slave Act
• Free-Soil Party • Harriet Beecher Stowe
• Stephen A. Douglas • Uncle Tom’s Cabin
• Compromise of 1850 • Kansas-Nebraska Act
These events and individuals, such as the Wilmot Proviso, Fugitive Slave Act, Free-Soil Party, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Stephen A. Douglas, Uncle Tom's Cabin, Compromise of 1850, and Kansas-Nebraska Act, played pivotal roles in deepening the divide over slavery and escalating tensions between North and South.
The Wilmot Proviso aimed to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, intensifying the sectional conflict over slavery's expansion.
The Fugitive Slave Act allowed the capture and return of escaped slaves, angering Northern abolitionists and heightening tensions.
The Free-Soil Party opposed slavery's expansion, promoting the ideals of free labor and preserving opportunities for white settlers.
Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel Uncle Tom's Cabin raised awareness of the harsh realities of slavery and influenced public opinion against it.
Stephen A. Douglas advocated popular sovereignty, allowing settlers to decide on slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska Act, leading to violent conflicts.
The Compromise of 1850 aimed to settle disputes between free and slave states, but it ultimately intensified sectional tensions.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise and led to violence as pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces clashed in Kansas, further deepening divisions.
To learn more about Proviso follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12552227
#SPJ4
Evaluate How did the Louisiana Purchase change the United States?
The Louisiana Purchase doubled the size of the United States and opened up vast opportunities for westward expansion.
The Louisiana Purchase, which took place in 1803, had a profound impact on the United States. Through this historic acquisition, the U.S. obtained approximately 828,000 square miles of territory from France, effectively doubling its size. This vast expanse of land included the Mississippi River and New Orleans, key trade routes that enhanced economic opportunities for the young nation. Additionally, the Louisiana Purchase provided fertile land suitable for agriculture, facilitating westward expansion and the settlement of new territories.
The acquisition also removed potential European threats to American interests in the region. Overall, the Louisiana Purchase significantly shaped the future of the United States, enabling its territorial growth and strengthening its position as a continental power.
To learn more about United States follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ4
the legal status of africansâ€â€slave or freeâ€â€deteriorated over the course of the seventeenth century. place the following events in the order in which they occurred.
The legal status of Africans as slaves or free deteriorated over the course of the seventeenth century.
The following events happened: The Virginia assembly defined slavery as a lifelong and inheritable status, the Royal African Company lost its monopoly on the English slave trade, and Maryland law made clear the intent of the colonies to make slavery a lifelong condition.
During the 17th century, the legal status of Africans as slaves or free worsened. Here is the order in which the following events took place:
1. The Virginia assembly defined slavery as a lifelong and inheritable status: It was in the year 1661 when Virginia adopted a law that limited the rights of slaves and defined their position as a lifetime condition. This law also prohibited slaves from holding any property or having any kind of agency. Slaves had become the property of their masters.
2. The Royal African Company lost its monopoly on the English slave trade: In the year 1698, the English government revoked the Royal African Company’s monopoly on the English slave trade. This move saw the entry of many new slave traders into the English slave market, leading to an increase in the number of slaves.
3. Maryland law made clear the intent of the colonies to make slavery a lifelong condition: Maryland adopted laws in 1663 and 1664 that formalized slavery as a lifetime condition, making it clear that they intended to make slavery a permanent and inheritable condition. This created a distinction between black and white workers and accelerated the growth of the African slave trade in North America.
In the seventeenth century, the legal status of Africans as slaves or free deteriorated rapidly. Three key events marked the transition from relative freedom to slavery.
The first was the adoption of a law by the Virginia assembly in 1661. The law defined slavery as a lifelong and inheritable condition, limiting the rights of slaves, and prohibiting them from holding property or having any agency. The second event was the revocation of the Royal African Company’s monopoly on the English slave trade in 1698.
This saw many new slave traders entering the market, which, in turn, led to an increase in the number of slaves. The third and final event was the formalization of slavery as a lifelong condition by Maryland's adoption of laws in 1663 and 1664. These laws made it clear that they intended to make slavery a permanent and inheritable condition, creating a distinction between black and white workers, and leading to the growth of the African slave trade in North America.
To learn more about North America visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23317844
#SPJ11
WHAT IF? In what ways might history have been changed if Lincoln had ordered Major Anderson to turn Fort Sumter over to the Confederacy?
If Abraham Lincoln had ordered Major Anderson to turn over Fort Sumter to the Confederacy, it would have had significant implications for the course of history. Here are a few ways in which history might have been changed:
Avoiding the American Civil War: The attack on Fort Sumter is widely regarded as the event that triggered the American Civil War. If Fort Sumter had been handed over peacefully, it might have diffused tensions between the North and the South temporarily, potentially avoiding the full-scale conflict.
Recognition of Confederate Independence: By turning over Fort Sumter, Lincoln would have implicitly acknowledged the legitimacy of the Confederacy. This act could have led to diplomatic recognition of the Confederate States of America by foreign nations, potentially including Great Britain and France.
Preservation of the Union: Lincoln's refusal to surrender Fort Sumter demonstrated his commitment to preserving the Union and upholding federal authority. If he had ordered its handover, it would have undermined his position and weakened the Union's resolve.
Potential Compromise and Negotiations: Handing over Fort Sumter might have created an opportunity for negotiations and compromises between the North and the South.
Different Emancipation Timeline: The abolition of slavery was a central objective for President Lincoln, but if Fort Sumter had been handed over, it would have likely prolonged the institution of slavery in the Confederate states.
To know about Abraham Lincoln
brainly.com/question/31691123
#SPJ4
Use the Terms & Names list to identify each sentence online or on your own paper.
A. vaquero
B. vigilante
C. buffalo soldier
D. Sitting Bull
E. frontier
F. long drive
G. Exoduster
H. sodbuster
I. Dawes Act
J. vaquero
K. standard time
L. George A. Custer
M. Homestead Act
I was defeated at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Answer:
George A. Custer was defeated at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Compare and Contrast How did Gorbachev and Yeltsin differ in their attitudes toward communism?
Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin were both prominent figures in the political landscape of the Soviet Union and Russia during times of significant political and ideological change.
Reform vs. Rejection:
Gorbachev: Gorbachev believed in reforming and revitalizing the Soviet communist system. He introduced policies such as perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness) aimed at modernizing the economy, increasing transparency, and allowing limited political reforms within the framework of communism.
Yeltsin: Yeltsin, on the other hand, had a more confrontational approach toward communism. He strongly rejected the ideology and was a vocal critic of the Soviet system. Yeltsin advocated for a transition to a market-based economy and multiparty democracy, advocating for a complete departure from the communist system.
Learn more about revitalizing here:
brainly.com/question/28492800
#SPJ4
Art Imagine you are a reformer in the mid1800s. Choose one of the problems that you read about in this section and make a poster that encourages citizens to become involved and make positive changes.
Women's suffrage was a significant issue in the mid-1800s. Women were not allowed to participate in most aspects of society, which made it difficult for them to attain independence or financial security.
If I was a reformer in the mid 1800s, I would have chosen the issue of women's suffrage. Women's suffrage was a fundamental issue in the mid 1800s. Women in most countries did not have the right to vote. Women were not permitted to participate in most aspects of society. They were not allowed to attend college or vote, for example. Women were not allowed to work in many professions or industries, which meant they were economically dependent on men. This made it difficult for them to attain independence or financial security. I would make a poster that encourages women to become involved and make positive changes in their lives and communities.
The poster would include powerful slogans such as “women's rights are human rights” and “equal rights for all.” It would also encourage women to vote, participate in politics, and speak out for their rights. The poster would feature strong images of women leaders who have made significant contributions to the cause of women's rights, such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Women's suffrage was a significant issue in the mid-1800s. Women were not allowed to participate in most aspects of society, which made it difficult for them to attain independence or financial security. Women's rights activists such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton fought for women's suffrage, and their efforts ultimately resulted in the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote. The poster would encourage women to become involved and make positive changes in their lives and communities.
To learn more about right to vote visit:
brainly.com/question/29759734
#SPJ11
The British East India Company first gained control over India through the policy of
Answer:
The British East India Company first gained control over India through the policy of Regulating Act (1773) and the India Act (1784).
Explanation:
Answer: Divide and Conquer Policy.
Explanation: The British East India Company first gained control over India through the policy of "Divide and Conquer." This policy involved exploiting existing divisions and conflicts within the Indian subcontinent to weaken and subjugate local rulers and kingdoms.
1ClaraA BartonN Timeline^
1821: Clara Barton is born in North Oxford, Massachusetts
1831: Barton cares for her brother David after he falls
1855: Barton moves to Washington D.C. to work as the first female federal patent clerk
1861: Barton begins gathering and distributing food, clothing and medical supplies to wounded soldiers during the civl war.
1862: Barton works on the front lines as a self-taught nurse
1865: After the war, Barton begins identifying anonymous soldiers
to be properly buried through the Office of missing soldiers
Part 1
According to the timeline, which of the following events happens second?
Barton identifies anonymous soldiers
Barton travels to Europe
Barton Works one the frontlines of the Civil War
Barton works as a federal patient clerk
Part 2
Which of the following words as used in the timeline indicates the chronology of events in Barton’s life?
Through
After
Front
First
Part 3
Which of the following information indicates Clara Barton has international influence ?
1865: After the war, Barton begins identifying anonymous soldiers to be properly buried through the Office of Missing Soldiers
1869: Barton travels to Europe, assisting with preparing military hospitals and supplying aid to the poor .
1881: Barton petitions President Chester A. Arthur to open an American branch of the International Red Cross organization .
1861: Barton begins gathering and distributing food, clothing and medical supplies to wounded soldiers during the Civil War.
Clara Barton was an influential figure in the United States and the world. Her work and dedication to helping others are proof of her international influence.
In 1862, she worked on the front of the Civil War as a self-taught nurse. After the war, she began identifying anonymous soldiers to be properly buried through the Office of Missing Soldiers. In 1869, Clara traveled to Europe, assisting with preparing military hospitals and supplying aid to the poor.
Her work was so impactful that in 1881, she was even able to petition President Chester A. Arthur to open an American branch of the International Red Cross organization. Thus, Clara Barton's hard work and dedication to helping those in need was recognized on an international level.
To know more about Clara Barton, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32651261
#SPJ4
Compare and Contrast In the first two years of the war, which side seemed closer to achieving its strategic goals?
Throughout the first two years of the war, the side that appeared closer to achieving its strategic objectives was the Confederacy. The Confederate army had been able to maintain its defensive position while continuing to expand and occupy large portions of the North.
Throughout the first two years of the war, the side that appeared closer to achieving its strategic objectives was the Confederacy. The Confederate army had been able to maintain its defensive position while continuing to expand and occupy large portions of the North.The Confederacy had developed a strategy to win the war that centered on defending its territory and relying on the support of foreign powers. The Union, on the other hand, struggled to develop a successful strategy to defeat the Confederacy.The Union had a number of strategic goals, including the blockade of Confederate ports, the seizure of key Southern cities, and the defeat of the Confederate army. In the first two years of the war, the Union made some progress in achieving these objectives, but it was slow and costly.By contrast, the Confederacy was able to hold on to its defensive position and continue to expand its territory in the South. This was due to the Confederacy's ability to use its resources more efficiently and to the fact that it was fighting on its home turf. It was able to recruit more soldiers and maintain a higher level of morale than the Union, which struggled to find new recruits and to keep its soldiers motivated.In conclusion, while both the Union and the Confederacy had strategic objectives in the first two years of the war, it was the Confederacy that seemed closer to achieving its goals.
To know more about strategic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26960576
#SPJ11
The proportion of single-person households has decreased dramatically since the 1960s. True or false
The proportion of single-person households has decreased dramatically since the 1960s. The given statement is False.
Since the 1960s, the percentage of single-person households has not decreased. The number of single-person homes has significantly increased during the past few decades in numerous nations, including the United States, Canada, and several European nations. This can be due to a number of things, such as shifting societal mores, a longer life expectancy, postponed marriage, greater divorce rates, and the rising number of people choosing to live alone.
Thus, the mentioned above-given statement is False.
Learn more about single-person households here:
https://brainly.com/question/32240209
#SPJ4
Why were american societies more susceptible to communicable diseases that their european counterparts after contact?
American societies were more susceptible to communicable diseases compared to their European counterparts after contact due to factors like: Lack of Immunity; Population Density and Urbanization; Lack of Domesticated Animals; and Limited Medical Knowledge.
All these factors contributed to the devastating impact of communicable diseases on indigenous American populations. Estimates suggest that diseases introduced by Europeans caused significant population declines and, in some cases, even led to the extinction of entire indigenous communities. This demographic catastrophe was often referred to as the "soil epidemic," highlighting the vulnerability of American societies to newly introduced diseases.
Learn more about communicable diseases here:
https://brainly.com/question/33455838
#SPJ4
How did the Treaty of Versailles contribute to Japanese actions that lead to the outbreak of war in Asia?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Treaty of Versailles, which was signed in 1919 at the end of World War I, did have an impact on Japanese actions that eventually led to the outbreak of war in Asia. While the treaty primarily focused on addressing issues related to Germany, its provisions indirectly affected Japan and contributed to the geopolitical climate that fueled Japanese aggression. Here are some key factors:
Shandong Peninsula: The treaty addressed German concessions in China, particularly the Shandong Peninsula, which had been under German control. The treaty transferred control of this territory to Japan instead of returning it to China. This decision caused outrage among the Chinese population and fueled anti-Japanese sentiments, as many believed that Japan, as an ally of the Allied Powers, would support Chinese sovereignty.
Colonial Ambitions: The treaty exposed Japan to the Western concept of colonialism and territorial acquisition. Japan had contributed significantly to the Allied war effort during World War I and had expected greater recognition and rewards. However, the limited gains achieved through the treaty, combined with a desire for resources and territory, led to a sense of frustration and a shift in Japanese foreign policy towards expansionism.
Economic Challenges: The global economic downturn following World War I, combined with the Great Depression in the 1930s, had a severe impact on Japan's economy. The country faced issues such as high unemployment, inflation, and a decline in industrial production. The limitations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles, such as restrictions on Japanese overseas trade and access to resources, further exacerbated these economic challenges. To address these issues, Japan sought to expand its influence and secure resources through aggressive actions in Asia.
Nationalism and Militarism: The perceived unequal treatment under the Treaty of Versailles and the economic challenges fueled nationalism and militarism within Japan. Ultra-nationalist factions gained prominence, advocating for a more assertive foreign policy and expansionism to secure Japan's interests. The military, particularly the Imperial Japanese Army, became increasingly influential in shaping Japan's foreign policy and exerted pressure on the civilian government.
Describe the goals of the New Deal.
In order to combat the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced a number of initiatives known collectively as the New Deal in the 1930s in the United States. The main objectives of the New Deal were to bring about relief, recovery, and reform.
The New Deal's first priority was to help the millions of Americans suffering from the tremendous economic hardships brought on by the Great Depression. Businesses failed, unemployment hit record highs, and families struggled with poverty and hunger. The New Deal aimed to accelerate economic recovery by boosting activity and reversing the economy's declining trend. Roosevelt sought to jump-start the economy by reviving businesses, regaining consumer confidence, and increasing government spending.
Learn more about The New Deal here:
https://brainly.com/question/32818235
#SPJ4
Was the agencies rule on the moratorium arbitrary and capricious? why or why not?
It would be required to conduct a thorough study of the unique circumstances and legal context of the rule in question to decide if an agency's moratorium rule is arbitrary and capricious.
In the United States, agencies are supposed to use a reasoned decision-making process when enacting rules or regulations. This is known as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
A legal test that courts employ to evaluate agency decisions is called the "arbitrary and capricious standard." An agency must offer a reasonable and cogent justification for the rule, backed up by facts, data, or expert views when determining whether a rule on a moratorium is arbitrary and capricious. Personal prejudice or unproven assumptions shouldn't be used to make the judgment.
Learn more about the moratorium rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/33450242
#SPJ4
Did America become an imperialist county at the end of the 19th century? Secondly, and here is a loaded question: are we an imperialist country today? NATO and the Western presence in Afghanistan recently and we are basically involved in Ukraine. Is this relevant?
Yes, America became an imperialist country at the end of the 19th century. Imperialism is a political ideology that seeks to establish or maintain the power of one nation over other countries.
It's a policy of expanding the economic and political power of one country by using military force or other means to dominate other countries or regions.
There are several reasons for the U.S. becoming an imperialist country at the end of the 19th century:
1. Economic Reasons: In the late 19th century, the U.S. experienced a period of rapid industrialization. As a result, American businesses sought new markets to sell their goods.
2. Nationalism: The U.S. believed in its superiority over other countries, and it was determined to prove it by expanding its territory and influence.
3. Military Reasons: The U.S. needed to maintain a strong navy to protect its shipping lanes and maintain its status as a world power. By acquiring colonies, the U.S. could establish military bases and coaling stations around the world.
The U.S. is still considered an imperialist country today.
The U.S. has military bases in several countries around the world, and it has been involved in several conflicts in recent years, including the war in Afghanistan and the conflict in Ukraine. The U.S. has also been accused of interfering in the politics of other countries to protect its economic and strategic interests.
However, it's worth noting that there is some debate over whether the U.S. should be considered an imperialist country today, and some argue that its policies are driven more by economic interests than a desire for political domination.
To learn more about Imperialism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30210572
#SPJ11
Connect Economics & History Why did New England come to depend on fishing and shipbuilding?
New England's dependence on fishing and shipbuilding stemmed from its abundant coastal resources, including fish and timber, its advantageous location for international trade, and the cultural heritage of maritime skills brought by early settlers.
Geographic Advantage: New England's coastal location provided access to rich fishing grounds, including cod, herring, and other valuable marine resources. The region's extensive coastline offered abundant opportunities for fishing, which became a vital economic activity.Natural Resources: New England possessed vast forests with ample timber, a crucial resource for shipbuilding. The availability of high-quality timber facilitated the construction of sturdy ships, supporting the growth of the shipbuilding industry.International Trade: New England's proximity to major international trade routes, particularly the Atlantic Ocean, positioned it favorably for commerce. The ships built in the region were essential for engaging in long-distance trade, facilitating the transportation of goods, such as timber, fish, and other commodities.Economic Demand: The demand for fish, both domestically and internationally, drove the development of the fishing industry in New England. The region's fish was sought after for consumption, preservation, and export to markets in Europe, the West Indies, and other colonies.Cultural Tradition: Fishing and shipbuilding became ingrained in New England's cultural identity. The early settlers, including the Puritans, brought maritime skills and traditions, further promoting the growth of these industries.Thus, the combination of favorable geography, access to resources, trade opportunities, economic demand, and cultural factors led to New England's dependence on fishing and shipbuilding.
For more such question on heritage
https://brainly.com/question/31739211
#SPJ8
Evaluate Do you think the popularity of television has had a positive or negative effect on American life? Explain and justify your opinion.
The popularity of television has had a somehow positive impact on American life.
It with its highly entertaining style, and visual interest has taken many people's attention for several hours each day. It has been compared to being as involved in people's lives as their own families and friends.
It could also be meant that television is used as a stress buster by people to get some daily entertainment. It is also found that it helps young minds to develop values and learn new things.
It is like all other attachments have some psychological impact on people's minds, people's attitudes and beliefs about themselves have been influenced.
Learn more about American life:
https://brainly.com/question/13493858
#SPJ4
why did david freese decline cardinals hall of fame
Answer:
David Freese, a former third baseman for the St. Louis Cardinals, has not publicly stated why he declined induction into the team's Hall of Fame. However, there has been speculation that his decision may be related to his desire to distance himself from the public spotlight and focus on his personal life and family. Freese has been open about his struggles with depression and anxiety, and he may feel that induction into the Hall of Fame would bring unwanted attention and pressure. It is also possible that there were disagreements or issues between Freese and the Cardinals organization that influenced his decision. Ultimately, the exact reasons for his decision are not known, as Freese has not publicly commented on the matter.
How and why did Texas attract American settlers?
Texas attracted American settlers through various means and factors, driven by both economic and political motivations. Here are some key reasons why Texas appealed to American settlers:
Land Grants and Cheap Land: The Mexican government, which controlled Texas at the time, implemented policies to encourage colonization and attract settlers. The Mexican Colonization Law of 1823 offered land grants to individuals and empresarios (agents who facilitated settlement), providing opportunities for Americans to acquire land at relatively low prices or even for free. These land incentives were particularly appealing to those seeking new economic prospects and the opportunity to establish their own farms or plantations.
Economic Opportunities: Texas boasted fertile soil, a favorable climate, and abundant natural resources, making it attractive for agricultural pursuits. The region was suitable for cotton cultivation, which was in high demand and offered the potential for substantial profits. Americans, including farmers, planters, and ranchers, were drawn to Texas for the opportunity to engage in large-scale agricultural production and capitalize on the expanding market for cotton.
Independence and Self-Governance: Many American settlers in Texas were drawn to the prospect of establishing their own communities and enjoying a greater degree of independence. The Mexican government initially allowed a considerable level of self-governance to the American settlers, which appealed to those seeking autonomy and political control.
Escape from Economic Hardships: During the 1820s and 1830s, the United States experienced economic hardships, including recessions and financial instability. Texas offered a fresh start for Americans looking to escape economic difficulties and seek better opportunities in a new frontier.
Land Speculation and Investment: Texas's uncertain political situation and the potential for future value appreciation enticed speculators and investors to acquire land. Many Americans saw Texas as a promising investment, anticipating that land prices would rise as the region developed and became more prosperous.
The Concept of Manifest Destiny: The idea of Manifest Destiny, the belief that it was the destiny of the United States to expand its territory from coast to coast, influenced American settlers' perception of Texas. The notion of claiming and settling new territories aligned with the ideals of westward expansion and nationalistic sentiments.
To know more about Texas visit;
https://brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
Explain the significance of the following:
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a prominent civil rights leader who fought for racial equality through nonviolent activism.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a prominent American civil rights leader and activist who played a pivotal role in the African American civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s. He is best known for his nonviolent approach to achieving racial equality and his powerful speeches, including his iconic "I Have a Dream" speech.
King's significance lies in his tireless efforts to combat racial segregation and discrimination, advocating for equal rights for all Americans. His leadership and activism brought attention to the systemic injustices faced by African Americans and inspired millions around the world to join the fight for civil rights and social justice. King's legacy continues to shape the pursuit of equality and justice today.
To learn more about rights follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/32700763
#SPJ4
Which statement best describes the beliefs of Jefferson's Republican party?
The Constitution was intended to be loosely interpreted.
The Constitution described a strong and large government.
The Constitution should be strictly read and followed.
The Constitution required a large amount of spending.
Answer: C
The Constitution should be strictly read and followed.
The statement that best describes the beliefs of Jefferson's Republican party is option C. The Constitution should be strictly read and followed.
Thomas Jefferson's Republican party, also known as the Democratic-Republican Party, believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. They believed that the federal government should have limited powers, with most authority residing in the hands of the states. Jefferson and his supporters were wary of a strong central government, fearing it could lead to tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties.
The Republicans opposed the Federalist party, led by Alexander Hamilton, who advocated for a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Hamilton believed in a strong and centralized government that could exercise broader powers for the betterment of the nation.
Jefferson's Republicans emphasized agrarianism, states' rights, and a limited role for the federal government. They championed the idea of a small, decentralized government that protected individual liberties, promoted agrarian interests, and fostered a more egalitarian society. They favored strict adherence to the Constitution as a means of preventing the federal government from overstepping its boundaries.
In summary, Jefferson's Republican party believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, limited federal powers, and a decentralized government structure. Therefore the correct option is C
Know more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ8
The Sherman Antitrust Act outlawed:
What are the two most important powers of the federal courts?
The two most important powers of the federal courts are judicial review and the ability to interpret and apply the Constitution.
1. Judicial review: This power allows the federal courts to review the actions of the other branches of government, including the legislative and executive branches. They can determine whether these actions are constitutional or not. This power is essential for maintaining the system of checks and balances in the United States, as it ensures that no branch exceeds its constitutional authority.
2. Interpreting and applying the Constitution: The federal courts have the authority to interpret and apply the provisions of the Constitution. They play a crucial role in resolving disputes and clarifying the meaning of constitutional provisions. This power helps protect individual rights and ensures that the Constitution is upheld as the supreme law of the land.
These two powers of the federal courts are fundamental to the functioning of the U.S. legal system, as they provide a mechanism for resolving conflicts, upholding the Constitution, and ensuring the fair and just administration of justice.
To know more about important visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31444866
#SPJ11
give some views on the political life in Canada
?
Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy.
The country has a multi-party system of government with two leading political parties. The Liberal Party and the Conservative Party
1. Canada is well-known for being a peaceful, stable, and democratic country with a strong commitment to human rights, freedom, and equality.
2. The country has a federal system of government with power divided between the central government and ten provincial governments. Each province has a government headed by a premier and a legislative assembly.
3. Canada has a strong tradition of civic engagement, with citizens actively participating in the political process through voting, political protests, and lobbying their elected representatives.
4. The country is known for its progressive social policies, including universal healthcare, same-sex marriage, and gender equality. However, some critics argue that progress has been slow in areas like Indigenous rights and climate change.
5. Political campaigns in Canada are regulated, with strict spending limits and transparency rules. Elections are held every four years, with the Prime Minister and Members of Parliament elected by popular vote.
6. Canada's political system is relatively open and accessible, with high levels of political transparency and accountability. However, there are concerns about the influence of money in politics and the role of corporate lobbying in shaping policy.
Learn more about monarchy.
https://brainly.com/question/30711729
#SPJ11