g A student council consists of 15 students. (a) How many ways can a committee of five be selected from the membership of the council

The solution to the given initial value problem is y(t) = (11/5)e^(2t) + (4/5)e^(5t) + (9/25)e^(5t).

The given initial value problem (IVP) can be solved by using the method of undetermined coefficients. First, we find the complementary solution by solving the associated homogeneous equation: y'' - 7y' + 10y = 0. The characteristic equation is r^2 - 7r + 10 = 0, which factors as (r - 2)(r - 5) = 0.

Therefore, the complementary solution is y_c(t) = c1e^(2t) + c2e^(5t), where c1 and c2 are constants. For the particular solution, we assume y_p(t) = Ae^(5t), where A is a constant to be determined. Plugging this into the original equation, we get 20Ae^(5t) - 35Ae^(5t) + 10Ae^(5t) = 9e^(5t). Solving for A, we find A = 9/5. Hence, the particular solution is y_p(t) = (9/5)e^(5t).

Finally, the general solution is y(t) = y_c(t) + y_p(t) = c1e^(2t) + c2e^(5t) + (9/5)e^(5t). Using the initial conditions, we can solve for c1 and c2 to obtain the unique solution.

To learn more about initial value click here

brainly.com/question/17613893

#SPJ11

The simplified ratio is 1 inch to 6 inches, or 1/6.

To express the ratio of 6 inches to 3 feet in its simplest form, we need to convert the measurements to a common unit. Since there are 12 inches in a foot, we can convert the feet to inches.

3 feet is equal to 3 x 12 = 36 inches.

So, the ratio becomes 6 inches to 36 inches.

The ratio is defined as the comparison of two quantities of the same units that indicates how much of one quantity is present in the other quantity. Ratios can be classified into two types. One is part to part ratio and the other is part to whole ratio.

The part-to-part ratio denotes how two distinct entities or groups are related. For example, the ratio of boys to girls in a class is 12: 15, whereas, the part-to-whole ratio denotes the relationship between a specific group to a whole. For example, out of every 10 people, 5 of them like to read books. Therefore, the part to the whole ratio is 5: 10, which means every 5 people from 10 people like to read books.

To simplify the ratio, we divide both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor (GCD), which is 6 in this case.

6 ÷ 6 = 1

36 ÷ 6 = 6

Therefore, the simplified ratio is 1 inch to 6 inches, or 1/6.

Hence, the answer is 1/6.

For more questions on ratio

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ8

There are 19 students on the bus total of $1668 was collected from 70 passengers

Let x be the number of students on the bus.

Then, the number of adults is 70 - x.

We know that the bus fare for each adult is $26 and the fare for each student is $18, thus we can write the equation:

18x + 26(70 - x) = 1668

Simplifying the above equation, we get:18x + 1820 - 26x = 1668-8x = -152x = 19

Therefore, the number of students on the bus is x = 19.

Therefore, there are 19 students on the bus.

To summarize, we used the equation 18x + 26(70 - x) = 1668 to solve the problem.

This is because we needed to determine the number of students on the bus given that the total fare collected from 70 passengers was $1668.

Therefore, the required answer is there are 19 students on the bus.

Learn more about equation here https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ11

Set B contains 35 elements.

Let's assume that Set B contains x elements.

We know that the total number of elements in either Set A or Set B is 84. This can be represented as:

|Set A ∪ Set B| = 84

Since Set A contains 75 elements and Set B contains x elements, we can express the number of elements in either Set A or Set B as the sum of their individual sizes minus the number of elements they have in common:

|Set A ∪ Set B| = |Set A| + |Set B| - |Set A ∩ Set B|

Substituting the given values:

84 = 75 + x - 26

Now, let's solve for x:

84 = 75 + x - 26

84 = 49 + x

84 - 49 = x

35 = x

Therefore, Set B contains 35 elements.

Learn more about Elements

brainly.com/question/12947937

#SPJ11

There are 35 elements contained in Set B.

Let's start with what we know:

Set A has 75 elements

The total number of elements in either Set A or Set B is 84

Sets A and B have 26 elements in common

We need to find how many elements are contained in set B

We know that the total number of elements in either Set A or Set B is 84.

We also know that Set A has 75 elements.

Using this information, we can find the number of elements in Set B by subtracting the number of elements in Set A from the total number of elements:

84 - 75 = 9

So, there are 9 elements in Set B that are not in Set A. However, we also know that Sets A and B have 26 elements in common.

Therefore, the total number of elements in Set B is:

9 + 26 = 35

Learn more about sets in math at:

https://brainly.com/question/28860949

#SPJ11

The percent change in the price is 4%.

The new price is $228.8.

To determine the percent change in the price of Software A, we can simply multiply the original price by the percentage increase.

Percent change = 4%

Original price = $220

Percent increase = 4% = 4/100 = 0.04

New price = Original price + (Percent increase * Original price)

New price = $220 + (0.04 * $220)

= $220 + $8.8

= $228.8

Therefore, for Software A:

The percent change in the price is 4%.

We can multiply the original price ($220) by 1.04 to determine the new price.

The new price is $228.8.

To know more about percent refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31323953#

#SPJ11

The probability that none of the five randomly selected adults in Holland have a car is 0.0328 or 3.28%.

To calculate the probability that none of the five randomly selected adults in Holland have a car, we need to use the concept of independent events and apply the multiplication rule.

Given that 68% of the people in Holland own a car, the probability of an individual not owning a car is 1 - 0.68 = 0.32.

Since each selection is independent, we can multiply the probabilities of not having a car for each of the five adults:

Probability of none of the five adults having a car = (0.32) × (0.32) × (0.32) × (0.32) × (0.32)

Probability of none of the five adults having a car = 0.0328

Therefore, the probability that none of the five randomly selected adults in Holland have a car is 0.0328 or 3.28%.

To learn more on probability click:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

The new mean would be 48, and the standard deviation would remain the same at 5.

When the professor decides to add 2 points to everyone's score, it affects the entire distribution of scores. Adding 2 points to each score will increase the mean by 2 points as well. Since the original mean was 46, adding 2 points would result in a new mean of 48.

However, the standard deviation remains the same. The standard deviation measures the spread or dispersion of the scores around the mean. Adding a constant value to each score does not change the spread of the scores, and therefore the standard deviation remains unchanged at 5.

In other words, the addition of 2 points to every score simply shifts the entire distribution upward by 2 units without affecting the variability or spread of the scores.

Learn more about standard deviation

brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

Based on the survey results, the student's belief that less than 40% of students at her school fear public speaking is not supported.

To conduct a hypothesis test, we need to set up the null and alternative hypotheses.

Let's denote the proportion of students at the school who fear public speaking as p.

Null Hypothesis (H₀): p ≥ 0.40 (The percentage of students at the school who fear public speaking is greater than or equal to 40%)

Alternative Hypothesis (H1): p < 0.40 (The percentage of students at the school who fear public speaking is less than 40%)

We will use a significance level of 0.05 (5%). If the p-value is less than 0.05, we will reject the null hypothesis.

To conduct the hypothesis test, we will use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution, as the sample size is large (n = 361) and the conditions for using the normal approximation are satisfied.

Let's calculate the test statistic (z-score) and the p-value:

Sample proportion (p') = 139/361 = 0.384

Standard Error (SE) = √(p'(1-p)/n) = √((0.384(1-0.384))/361) = 0.027

Test Statistic (z-score) = (p' - p) / SE = (0.384 - 0.40) / 0.027 = -0.5926

Now, we will calculate the p-value corresponding to the test statistic using a standard normal distribution table or calculator.

The p-value is the probability of observing a z-score less than or equal to the calculated z-score (-0.5926) if the null hypothesis is true.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the p-value for a z-score of -0.5926 is approximately 0.2772.

Since the p-value (0.2772) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, based on the survey results, the student's belief that less than 40% of students at her school fear public speaking is not supported.

Learn more about hypothesis test click;

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

The number of different signals consisting of 6 flags if the first flag must be blue is `15,120 different signals.`.

We have to find out the number of different signals consisting of 6 flags, if the first flag must be blue.If the first flag is blue, then there are 14 colors of flags that can be used to select the remaining 5 flags.

Using the fundamental principle of counting, the number of possible signals can be calculated by multiplying the number of options for each flag position.

That is:

14 options × 13 options × 12 options × 11 options × 10 options × 1 option= 240,240 different signals

However, this calculation also considers the order in which the flags are placed. The flags on the pole can be arranged in 6! ways. Since the order of the flags does not matter, each signal has been counted 6! times

.To get the number of different signals consisting of 6 flags, we need to divide 240,240 by 6! 240,240 / (6!)= 240,240 / 720= 333 different signals, to the nearest whole number.

The first flag is blue, hence, there are five more flags left to choose from the 14 remaining colors.

The number of signals that can be created with these five flags is: 13 × 12 × 11 × 10 × 9 = 15,120

The total number of signals that can be made using a blue flag as the first flag is:15,120 × 1 = 15,120 different signals.

Learn more about Combinations at:

https://brainly.com/question/27173663

#SPJ11

The equation of the line in slope-intercept form is y = 5x − 18.

Point-Slope Form:
The equation of the line in point slope form is (y − y1) = a(x − x1) \

given that the slope is 5 and the line passes through (4,2).

Here, x1 = 4, y1 = 2, and slope, a = 5.

Substituting these values in the given formula,

we get(y − 2) = 5(x − 4)Slope-Intercept Form:

The given equation in point slope form is (y − 2) = 5(x − 4).

Now, we will convert it into the slope-intercept form y = mx + b,

where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

To convert the given equation into the slope-intercept form,

we simplify it by solving for y.(y − 2) = 5(x − 4)

⇒ y − 2 = 5x − 20 (distribute 5)⇒ y

= 5x − 20 + 2 (add 2 to both sides)⇒ y

= 5x − 18

To know more about line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2696693

#SPJ11

Jill will have approximately $394,881.39 in her account when she reaches the age of 65.

To calculate the amount Jill will have in her account when she reaches the age of 65, we can use the formula for the future value of a series of monthly deposits compounded monthly.

Let's break down the given information:

- Jill deposited $300 at the end of each month from age 25 to 40, which means there are 15 years (40 - 25) of monthly deposits.

- The interest rate is 6% per year, compounded monthly. To calculate the monthly interest rate, we divide the annual interest rate by 12 and express it as a decimal. Therefore, the monthly interest rate is (6/12)/100 = 0.005.

Using the formula for the future value of a series of monthly deposits:

Future Value = Monthly Deposit * [((1 + Monthly Interest Rate)^(Number of Months) - 1) / Monthly Interest Rate]

Let's plug in the values:

Monthly Deposit = $300

Monthly Interest Rate = 0.005

Number of Months = 15 * 12 = 180 (15 years * 12 months/year)

Future Value = $300 * [((1 + 0.005)¹⁸⁰ - 1) / 0.005]

Calculating this expression will give us the future value of Jill's retirement account at age 65.

Future Value ≈ $394,881.39

Therefore, Jill will have approximately $394,881.39 in her account when she reaches the age of 65.

Learn more about Future Value here

https://brainly.com/question/30787954

#SPJ4

For linear programming problem Minimize z = 40x₁ + 30x₂, Subject to:

3x₁ + 7x₂ ≥ 120; 5x₁ + 2x₂ ≥ 200; x₁, x₂ ≥ 0, the optimal point of this problem, the value of z is 1600.

To determine the value of z in the optimal point of the given linear programming problem, we need to solve the problem using the constraints and objective function.

The linear programming problem is as follows:

Minimize z = 40x₁ + 30x₂

Subject to:

3x₁ + 7x₂ ≥ 120

5x₁ + 2x₂ ≥ 200

x₁, x₂ ≥ 0

To solve this problem, we can graph the feasible region defined by the constraints and find the corner point that minimizes the objective function.

Graphing the constraints, we have:

First constraint: 3x₁ + 7x₂ ≥ 120

Plotting the line 3x₁ + 7x₂ = 120, we shade the region above the line.

Second constraint: 5x₁ + 2x₂ ≥ 200

Plotting the line 5x₁ + 2x₂ = 200, we shade the region above the line.

Now, we identify the feasible region, which is the region where the shaded areas intersect.

Next, we calculate the value of the objective function at each corner point of the feasible region.

Corner point candidates:

The intersection of the two lines

The x-intercept of each line

The y-intercept of each line

By solving the system of equations, we find that the intersection point is (x₁, x₂) = (40, 0).

Now, we calculate z at this point:

z = 40x₁ + 30x₂

z = 40(40) + 30(0)

z = 1600.

Therefore, in the optimal point of this problem, the value of z is 1600.

Learn more about linear programming problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/29405467

#SPJ11

The phenomenon of being able to determine the true probabilities of events using a large number of trials is known as the law of large numbers.

The Law of Large Numbers states that in the long run, as the number of trials or observations increases, the observed relative frequencies of events will converge to the true probabilities.

It suggests that when an experiment is repeated a large number of times, the average or expected relative frequency of an event will approach its theoretical probability.

In other words, although the true probabilities of events cannot be determined with certainty based on a small number of trials, repeated trials or observations will result in more accurate and predictable relative frequencies.

More on the law of large numbers can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/31960941

#SPJ4

a quadrilateral ASTU, the vertices of the quadrilateral are A(-2, 2), S(2, 2), T(4, -2), and U(-4, -2).

The reflection of the given quadrilateral over the y-axis is shown below:

In order to find the coordinates of the vertices of ASTU after it is reflected over the y-axis, we will follow the below steps:

Step 1: Change the sign of the x-coordinate of each vertex of the given quadrilateral ASTU.

Step 2: Now, plot the vertices of the reflected quadrilateral on the coordinate plane.

A(-2, 2) will become A(2, 2)

S(2, 2) will become S(-2, 2)

T(4, -2) will become T(-4, -2)

U(-4, -2) will become U(4, -2)

Therefore, the coordinates of the vertices of ASTU after it is reflected over the y-axis are A(2, 2), S(-2, 2), T(-4, -2), and U(4, -2).

To learn more on quadrilateral:

https://brainly.com/question/27991573

#SPJ11

Complete Question: Attached below

The correct answer of a) The solutions for both inequalities are x = 4. b) The constants in both equations don't matter and they will have the same solution. This is how we can tell that these inequalities will have the same solutions without performing any calculations.

Higher-order thinking is a cognitive skill that involves analyzing, evaluating, synthesizing, and creating. The inequalities 5x + 7 = 11 and -x-72-11 have the same solutions. The solutions for both inequalities are x = 4.

To solve for x, we will first solve for 5x + 7 = 11.

We will subtract 7 from both sides. 5x = 4.

Then, we will divide both sides by 5. x = 4/5.

The solutions for -x-72-11 are the same.

We will add 72 and 11 to both sides. -x= -61.

Then we will multiply both sides by -1. x = 61.  

Hence, the solutions for both inequalities are x = 4.  

By observing the constants in both equations, it is clear that they will have the same solution.

This is because when solving an equation such as ax + b = c, the solution is always (c-b)/a, no matter the values of a, b, and c.

Therefore, the constants in both equations don't matter and they will have the same solution. This is how we can tell that these inequalities will have the same solutions without performing any calculations.

know more about inequalities

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ11

We have conducted a one-sample Z-test, and you obtained a z-value of 5.7, the conclusion is that the null hypothesis is rejected, and the alternative hypothesis is accepted.

The decision rule for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis based on the Z-value is that if the Z-value is greater than or less than 1.96, the null hypothesis is rejected. Otherwise, if the Z-value falls within the range of -1.96 to 1.96, then the null hypothesis is accepted . As the calculated Z-value of 5.7 is greater than the critical value of 1.96, the null hypothesis is rejected. This indicates that the alternative hypothesis is true. The significance of the results suggests that the sample mean is significantly different from the population mean. Thus, the conclusion is that there is a significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean.

Let's learn more about hypothesis:

https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

We can conclude that there is no measurable effect of immersing them in water or dropping them. Thus, we cannot conclude that the treatment has any significant effect.

To answer whether there appears to be any measurable effect of immersing the devices in water or dropping them, we have to compare the average scores of each group before and after submerging them in water or dropping them.

The null and alternative hypotheses are stated as follows:

Null Hypothesis H0:

µ1 = µ2 = µ3

Alternative Hypothesis Ha:

µ1 ≠ µ2 ≠ µ3

The level of significance is α = 0.05.

ANOVA table helps us to calculate the test statistic.

The calculated F-value of 1.56 is less than the critical F-value of 3.05 at the 0.05 level of significance.

Since the calculated F-value is less than the critical F-value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.There is no significant difference in the scores between the groups.

Learn more about null hypothesis at:

https://brainly.com/question/32572205

#SPJ11

A required confidential interval is 0.11 ≤ σ ≤ 0.27 when a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation.

Given that,

We have to find a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation.

We know that,

The data has of size n = 12

That is 2.32, 2.09, 2.36, 1.95, 1.98, 2.25, 2.16, 2.07, 1.88, 1.94, 1.97, 2.02.

Let S be the sample standard deviation,

S = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{Z(X_i-\bar X)^2}{n-1} }[/tex]

Here [tex]\bar X[/tex] is the sample mean

By using the formula we estimate the value of S

Construct 95% confidence interval for population standard deviation σ.

Formula is [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(n-1)S^2}{X^2_{\frac{\alpha }{2},n-1} } }\leq \sigma\leq \sqrt{\frac{(n-1)S^2}{X^2_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},n-1} } }[/tex]

Here, n= 12 ⇒ n-1 = 11

c = 95% = 0.95

α =1 -c =1 -0.95 =0.05

[tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] = 0.025 and 1 - [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] = 0.975

[tex]X^2_{\frac{\alpha }{2},n-1}[/tex] = [tex]X^2_{0.025,11}[/tex] = 21.92

[tex]X^2_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},n-1}[/tex] = [tex]X^2_{0.975,11}[/tex] = 3.82

The required confidential interval is

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{(11)(0.156)^2}{21.92 } }\leq \sigma\leq \sqrt{\frac{(11)(0.156)^2}{3.82 } }[/tex]

0.11 ≤ σ ≤ 0.27

Therefore, A required confidential interval is 0.11 ≤ σ ≤ 0.27 when a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation.

To know more about interval visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ4

The complete question is not given so the one that appears here is the full question:

A healthcare provider monitors the number of CAT scans performed each month in each of its clinics. The most recent year of data for a particular clinics follows 2.32, 2.09, 2.36, 1.95, 1.98, 2.25, 2.16, 2.07, 1.88, 1.94, 1.97, 2.02. Find a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation.

If the pressure is decreased to 5 pounds per square inch, the volume of the gas will be 680 cubic inches.

If the volume of a gas varies inversely as the pressure on the gas, we can use the formula:

Volume 1 * Pressure 1 = Volume 2 * Pressure 2

Let's denote the initial volume as V1 (340 cubic inches) and the initial pressure as P1 (10 pounds per square inch). We want to find the new volume, V2, when the pressure is decreased to P2 (5 pounds per square inch).

Putting the values into the formula, we have:

V1 * P1 = V2 * P2

340 * 10 = V2 * 5

3400 = V2 * 5

Dividing both sides of the equation by 5:

V2 = 3400 / 5

V2 = 680 cubic inches

Therefore, if the pressure is decreased to 5 pounds per square inch, the volume of the gas will be 680 cubic inches.

Learn more about Volume of a Gas at

brainly.com/question/15110960

#SPJ4

The null hypothesis (H0) is a statistical hypothesis that the researcher thinks is true. On the other hand, an alternative hypothesis (Ha) is a statement of a counter-hypothesis to the null hypothesis.

Based on the information provided, we can formulate the null and alternative hypotheses as follows:

Null Hypothesis (H0): The mean anxiety scores of bullies and bully-victims are equal.

Alternative Hypothesis (HA): The mean anxiety scores of bullies and bully-victims are not equal.

Symbolically, we can represent these hypotheses as:

H0: μ1 = μ2

HA: μ1 ≠ μ2

where:

- μ1 represents the population mean anxiety score of bullies,

- μ2 represents the population mean anxiety score of bully-victims.

These hypotheses assume that there is no inherent difference in the mean anxiety scores between bullies and bully-victims (null hypothesis), and the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is indeed a difference between the two groups.

To learn more about hypothesis: https://brainly.com/question/25263462

#SPJ11

Devin has 8 candies.

Norman has four less than triple the amount of candy Devin has. Let's denote the number of candies Devin has as 'x'. Therefore, the number of candies Norman has can be expressed as 3x - 4.

We are given that Norman has twenty candies. Plugging this information into the expression we derived earlier, we can set up the equation 3x - 4 = 20.

To find the value of 'x', we need to solve this equation. It can start by isolating the variable term by adding 4 to both sides of the equation:

3x - 4 + 4 = 20 + 4

Simplifying the equation, we have:

3x = 24

Next, solve for 'x' by dividing both sides of the equation by 3:

3x/3 = 24/3

Simplifying further,  get:

x = 8

Therefore, Devin has 8 candies.

To learn more about Devin - brainly.com/question/3324823

#SPJ11

The commonly used critical value for a 91% confidence level is approximately 1.70 (option a).

Given that the population appears to be very skewed and s is known, we can use the z-distribution to find the critical value.

For a 91% confidence level, we need to find the critical value za/2. This value represents the z-score corresponding to an area of (1 - 0.91) / 2 = 0.045 in the tails of the distribution.

Since the values given for the critical values do not match the common critical values for a 91% confidence level, we need to calculate the critical value za/2. However, the correct value depends on the specific z-table used. The commonly used critical value for a 91% confidence level is approximately 1.70.

Therefore, the correct answer is (a) za/2 = 1.70.

The complete question is:

Do one of the following, as appropriate: (a) Find the critical value za/2, (b) find the critical value ta/2, (c) state that neither the normal nor the t distribution applies.

91%; n = 45; s is known; population appears to be very skewed.

a. za/2 = 1.70

b. ta/2 = 1.645

c. za/2 = 1.75

d. ta/2 = 1.34

To know more about critical value:

https://brainly.com/question/32607910

#SPJ4

If we add the extra vertex E at the center of the square, we can construct a minimum-weight spanning tree with a total weight of 600, which is less than the 300 weight achieved without the additional vertex.

We start by adding a vertex at the center of the square and label it  E, we can create a minimum-weight spanning tree as follows:

1. We connect Connect E to each of the vertices A, B, C, D.

2. Connect the remaining vertices with the minimum-weight edges.

This construction creates additional edges in the spanning tree, reducing the total weight. The additional edges will be :

Half of the square's side length, or 50, is required to reach any vertex (A, B, C, or D). Therefore, each of these extra edges has a 50 weight.

Total weight = Weight of AB + Weight of BC + Weight of CD + Weight of DA + Weight of EA + Weight of EB + Weight of EC + Weight of ED

= 100 + 100 + 100 + 100 + 50 + 50 + 50 + 50

= 600

Learn more about spanning tree, at:

https://brainly.com/question/29991588

#SPJ4

The equilibrium quantity for the commodity is approximately 14.6 units, and the equilibrium price is approximately $384.8.

To find the equilibrium quantity and price, we need to set the supply and demand functions equal to each other and solve for q, which represents the quantity, and p, which represents the price.

Setting the supply and demand functions equal to each other:

q² + 2q + 16 = -8q² + 5q + 436

Rearranging the equation:

9q² + 3q - 420 = 0

Now we can solve this quadratic equation for q. Using the quadratic formula, we get:

q = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / 2a

Plugging in the values a = 9, b = 3, and c = -420, we can calculate q.

q = (-3 ± √(3² - 4 * 9 * -420)) / (2 * 9)

q = (-3 ± √(9 + 15120)) / 18

q = (-3 ± √15129) / 18

Taking the positive value, we get q ≈ 14.6.

Now we can substitute this value of q back into either the supply or demand function to find the equilibrium price. Using the demand function:

p = -8(14.6)² + 5(14.6) + 436

p ≈ 384.8

Therefore, the equilibrium quantity is approximately 14.6 units, and the equilibrium price is approximately $384.8.

To learn more about equilibrium quantity click here

brainly.com/question/13501330

#SPJ11

The estimated probability that a randomly selected customer will pay by credit card is approximately 0.4452 for the given set of credit cards purchased.

Given that,

In the last three months a total of 84,572 purchases, and 37,618 of them were paid for by credit card.

Now,

The estimated probability that a randomly selected customer will pay by credit card can be calculated by dividing the number of purchases paid for by credit card by the total number of purchases.

Therefore, using the given information:

Total purchases (n) = 84,572

Credit card purchases (x) = 37,618

The estimated probability (p) of a randomly selected customer paying by credit card can be calculated using the formula;

p = x/n

Substitute the given values of purchases we have;

p = 37,618/84,572p ≈ 0.4452

Therefore, the estimated probability that a randomly selected customer will pay by credit card is approximately 0.4452 for the given set of credit cards purchased.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Elrond can seat the other six guests in (5!) × (2!) ways.

The required number of ways is 2,880.

Given that, Elrond is organizing a council in Rivendell, he has invited two men, two dwarves, and two elves, and plans to seat them along with himself in a circle with seven seats. He wants to seat them so that no dwarf is sitting next to an elf.

Since the circle has a head chair, he must sit at the head of the circle.

Thus, the total number of ways in which Elrond can seat the other six guests is given by:

(5!) × (2!), where the first factor, 5! is the number of ways of arranging the 5 guests in a circle and the second factor, 2! is the number of ways in which the dwarves can be seated among themselves so that they are not sitting next to an elf.

Hence, Elrond can seat the other six guests in (5!) × (2!) ways.

Therefore, the required number of ways is 2,880.

Learn more about "Combination and Permutation" : https://brainly.com/question/4658834

#SPJ11

The likelihood of single adolescent mothers breastfeeding their newborn infants is not statistically significant based on the given p-value of 0.18.

In statistical analysis, p-value measures the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. A p-value less than 0.05 is typically considered statistically significant, indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis. Conversely, a p-value greater than 0.05 suggests that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

In this case, the p-value of 0.18 indicates that there is a 18% chance that the observed results occurred by chance alone, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Since this p-value is greater than the commonly used threshold of 0.05, it suggests that there is not enough evidence to conclude a significant association between single adolescent mothers and breastfeeding rates of their newborn infants.

Based on the p-value of 0.18, there is no strong statistical evidence to suggest a significant association between being a single adolescent mother and the likelihood of breastfeeding their newborn infant. However, it is important to consider other factors and conduct further research to gain a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between these variables.

To know more about p-value follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/4621112

#SPJ11

The source of bias in the survey embarked upon would stem from that 'many people refuse to respond to telephone surveys.'

The behaviour whereby people refuse to respond to telephone surveys is called non-response bias. It can occur for a variety of reasons, such as people being too busy, not interested in the survey, or not trusting the surveyor. Non-response bias can lead to the survey results being inaccurate, as the people who do respond may not be representative of the population as a whole.

Therefore , the presence of bias would likely stem from the fact that "many people refuse to respond to telephone surveys."

Learn more on bias: https://brainly.com/question/24491228

#SPJ4

The surface area of the pyramid formed from the net shown here is 62.4cm²

We know that

The surface area of the triangular pyramid is equal to the area of the triangular base plus the area of its three lateral triangular faces

In this problem the triangles are equilateral, that means, the surface area is equal to the area of four congruent equilateral triangles

so

A = 4 (bh)/2

since b = 6cm and

h = 5.2cm

Substitute and  we have

A = 4 ((6 x 5.2)/2)

= 62.4cm²

Learn more about surface area at:

https://brainly.com/question/76387

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

What is the surface area of the pyramid formed from the net shown here? The triangles are equilateral, and each triangle has a height of 5.2 centimeters. See attached image.

46,656 is a number whose 6th root is a whole number.

A whole number, n, greater than 5 is 6.

One such example of a number whose nth root (n = 6) is a whole number is 46,656.46,656 = 6^6

= 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 Approach to finding the example:

To find a number whose nth root is a whole number, we need to multiply n together n times.

For example, if we want to find a number whose 4th root is a whole number, we need to multiply 4 together 4 times. Therefore, we can find a number whose nth root is a whole number by multiplying n together n times

For n = 6, we multiply 6 together 6 times, which gives us 6^6.

To know more about root visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16932611

#SPJ11