Heather was asked to find the density of a brick given the mass in kilograms and the dimensions of the brick in meters. She wrote her answer, 2,400 kilograms per square meter, on the chalkboard. Without even performing the calculations first, Jonathan knew right away that her answer was incorrect. How could he tell there was an error?

A. The units should be kilograms.

B. The units should be kilograms per cubic meter.

C. The units should be kilograms per meter.

D. The units should be cubic meters.

Jill can pay a maximum of $192 for a bedspread.

Jill wants to mark up the price of the bedspread by 30%, so she needs to pay at least 250 / 1.3 = $192 for it. If she pays more than $192, she will not be able to make a 30% profit.

Jill wants to mark up the price of the bedspread by 30%. This means that she wants to sell it for 1.3 times the price she pays for it.

The maximum price that customers are willing to pay is $250.

If Jill pays more than $192 for the bedspread, she will not be able to sell it for $250 and make a 30% profit.

Therefore, the most that Jill can pay for the bedspread is $192.

To learn more about profit here brainly.com/question/32381738

#SPJ11

Jill can pay a maximum of $192 for a bedspread.

Jill wants to mark up the price of the bedspread by 30%, so she needs to pay at least 250 / 1.3 = $192 for it. If she pays more than $192, she will not be able to make a 30% profit.

Jill wants to mark up the price of the bedspread by 30%. This means that she wants to sell it for 1.3 times the price she pays for it.

The maximum price that customers are willing to pay is $250.

If Jill pays more than $192 for the bedspread, she will not be able to sell it for $250 and make a 30% profit.

Therefore, the most that Jill can pay for the bedspread is $192.

To learn more about profit here brainly.com/question/32381738

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen applicant has a graduate degree, given that they have over 5 years of experience, is 52/217.

To find the probability that a randomly chosen applicant has a graduate degree, given that they have over 5 years of experience, we can use conditional probability.

Let's define the following events:

A: Applicant has a graduate degree

B: Applicant has over 5 years of experience

We are given:

P(B) = 217/493 (probability of having over 5 years of experience)

P(A ∩ B) = 52/493 (probability of having over 5 years of experience and a graduate degree)

The probability that a randomly chosen applicant has a graduate degree, given that they have over 5 years of experience can be calculated using the formula for conditional probability:

P(A | B) = P(A ∩ B) / P(B)

Plugging in the values:

P(A | B) = (52/493) / (217/493)

P(A | B) = 52/217

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen applicant has a graduate degree, given that they have over 5 years of experience, is 52/217.

For more about probability:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4

The conditional probability that all four balls chosen are white, given that all balls are of the same color, is approximately 0.0893 or 8.93%.

To find the conditional probability that all four balls chosen are white, given that all balls are of the same color, we need to calculate two probabilities: the probability that all four balls are white and the probability that all four balls are of the same color.

The probability that all four balls are white can be calculated as follows:

P(All four balls are white) = (Number of ways to choose 4 white balls) / (Total number of ways to choose 4 balls)

Number of ways to choose 4 white balls = C(5, 4) = 5

Total number of ways to choose 4 balls = C(4+5+6+7, 4) = C(22, 4) = 7315

P(All four balls are white) = 5 / 7315

Now, let's calculate the probability that all four balls are of the same color.

We can calculate this probability for each color (red, white, blue, and green) and sum them up:

P(All balls are of the same color) = P(All four balls are red) + P(All four balls are white) + P(All four balls are blue) + P(All four balls are green)

To calculate the probability that all four balls are of a specific color, we use the same formula as before:

P(All four balls are of a specific color) = (Number of ways to choose 4 balls of that color) / (Total number of ways to choose 4 balls)

Number of ways to choose 4 balls of a specific color = C(Number of balls of that color, 4)

Total number of ways to choose 4 balls = C(4+5+6+7, 4) = 7315

Using this formula for each color, we get:

P(All four balls are red) = C(4, 4) / 7315 = 1 / 7315

P(All four balls are white) = C(5, 4) / 7315 = 5 / 7315

P(All four balls are blue) = C(6, 4) / 7315 = 15 / 7315

P(All four balls are green) = C(7, 4) / 7315 = 35 / 7315

Now we can calculate the conditional probability using Bayes' theorem:

P(All four balls are white | All balls are of the same color) = P(All four balls are white) / P(All balls are of the same color)

P(All four balls are white | All balls are of the same color) = (5 / 7315) / [(1 / 7315) + (5 / 7315) + (15 / 7315) + (35 / 7315)]

Simplifying the expression:

P(All four balls are white | All balls are of the same color) = (5 / 7315) / (56 / 7315) = 5 / 56 ≈ 0.0893

Therefore, the conditional probability that all four balls chosen are white, given that all balls are of the same color, is approximately 0.0893 or 8.93%.

Learn more about conditional probability click;

https://brainly.com/question/10567654

#SPJ4

Complete question =

If 4 balls are randomly chosen from an urn containing 4 red, 5 white, 6 blue, and 7 green balls, find the conditional probability they are all white given that all balls are of the same color.

The value of the test statistic for this problem is given as follows:

z = 4.28.

As we are working with a proportion, the z-distribution is used, and the equation for the test statistic is given as follows:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

In which:

The parameters for this problem are given as follows:

[tex]\overline{p} = 0.59, p = 0.5, n = 565[/tex]

(p = 0.5 because the most word states that we are testing if the proportion is greater than 0.5).

Hence the test statistic is given as follows:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.59 - 0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(0.5)}{565}}}[/tex]

z = 4.28.

More can be learned about the z-distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25890103

#SPJ1

The question is asking for the calculation of the break-even point, which is the point where the total cost of production is equal to the total revenue earned. In this case, we need to find the break-even point in cuts and money.

According to the given information, Camila Peluquería has three hairdressers with three chairs and pays each of them $1.50 per cut regardless of the number of cuts they make. The operational capacity of the salon is 1,200 cuts per month. And the price per unit of hair cutting is $5. Let x be the number of cuts per month, and y be the monthly revenue earned. Then, we can write the following equations for cost and revenue:[tex]Cost = fixed cost + variable cost Variable cost = cost per unit * x[/tex]

[tex]Fixed cost = 3 (number of hairdressers) * 1.5 (cost per cut) * 30 (days per month) = $1350[/tex]

[tex]Total cost = fixed cost + variable cost = $1350 + 1.5xRevenue = price per unit * x Monthly revenue = 5x[/tex]

We need to find the break-even point where the total cost is equal to the total revenue, so:[tex]Total cost = Total revenue1350 + 1.5x = 5x[/tex]

Simplifying the equation:[tex]3.5x = 1350x = 1350/3.5x ≈ 385.71[/tex]

Therefore, the break-even point in cuts is approximately 386 cuts per month. To find the break-even point in money, we can substitute x in the revenue equation:[tex]Monthly revenue = 5xMonthly revenue = 5(385.71)[/tex]

Monthly revenue ≈ $1,928.55. Therefore, the break-even point in money is approximately $1,929.I hope this helps!

To know more about operational capacity, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14952769

#SPJ11

The probability that there will be exactly 4 flaws in 1200 feet of cable is 0.091.

The given problem can be solved using the Poisson distribution. Given below is the step-by-step explanation. Let λ be the mean number of flaws per 100 feet. Hence, the number of flaws in 1200 feet of cable follows a Poisson distribution with parameter:μ=λ×1200=0.6×12=7.2.

Let X represent the quantity of faults in the 1200 feet of cable. X then equals Poisson (7.2). The likelihood that 1200 feet of wire will include exactly 4 defects is therefore P(X = 4)=e(-7.2) (7.24) / 4!P(X = 4)=0.091. Therefore, 0.091 is the necessary probability. Therefore, there is a 0.091 percent chance that each 1200 feet of cable contains exactly 4 defects.

To know more about flaws refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12092470#

#SPJ11

The height of Animal A is approximately 2.6 inches, the height of Animal B is approximately 1.3 inches, and the height of Animal C is approximately 0.7 inches, based on the given weight-height relationship function.

| Animal  | Weight (w) | Height (h) |

|---------|------------|------------|

| Animal A | 2.5 |       -      |

| Animal B | 5.2 |       -      |

| Animal C | 9.8 |       -      |

To find the height of each animal using the given function h(w) = 6.5/w, we can substitute the weight (w) values into the function and round the results to the nearest tenth.

For Animal A, with a weight of 2.5, we can calculate its height as follows:

h(2.5) = 6.5/2.5 ≈ 2.6

The height of Animal A is approximately 2.6 inches.

For Animal B, with a weight of 5.2, we can calculate its height as follows:

h(5.2) = 6.5/5.2 ≈ 1.3

The height of Animal B is approximately 1.3 inches.

For Animal C, with a weight of 9.8, we can calculate its height as follows:

h(9.8) = 6.5/9.8 ≈ 0.7

The height of Animal C is approximately 0.7 inches.

To know more about Height, visit

https://brainly.com/question/73194

#SPJ11

To prove the theorem by contradiction, we start by assuming the fact that there exist two real numbers, x, and y, such that (x+y)/2 is greater than both x and y individually, i.e., (x+y)/2 > x or (x+y)/2 > y. So, the first option is correct.

The proof by contradiction of the theorem starts by assuming that: "There exists two real numbers, x, and y, such that (x+y)/2 > x and (x+y)/2 > y." The proof by contradiction of the theorem is as follows:

Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that (x+y)/2 > x and (x+y)/2 > y for all real numbers x and y.

This implies that (x+y) > 2x and (x+y) > 2y.

Adding these inequalities gives 2x + 2y < 2(x + y), or equivalently, x + y < x + y, which is impossible, since x + y = x + y for all real numbers x and y. Therefore, our initial assumption that (x+y)/2 > x and (x+y)/2 > y for all real numbers x and y must be false.

So there must be at least one pair of real numbers x and y such that (x+y)/2 ≤ x or (x+y)/2 ≤ y, which proves the theorem.

Hence, the option that is correct is - "There exists two real numbers, x, and y, such that (x+y)/2 > x or (x+y)/2 > y."

"There exists two real numbers, x, and y, such that (x+y)/2 > x or (x+y)/2 > y." This assumption is made to establish the contradiction that leads to the proof of the theorem.

The concept being used in the proof by contradiction is the assumption that contradicts the theorem in order to demonstrate that the theorem must be true.

In this case, the theorem states that the average of any two real numbers is less than or equal to at least one of the two numbers. The proof by contradiction aims to show that this statement is always true by assuming the opposite and reaching a contradiction.

The assumption made is that there exist two real numbers, x, and y, such that (x+y)/2 > x or (x+y)/2 > y. This assumption implies that the average of x and y is greater than one or both of the numbers individually.

To prove the theorem by contradiction, the assumption is examined and shown to lead to a contradiction with the properties of real numbers. This contradiction arises when it is shown that the assumption cannot hold true for all possible choices of x and y.

By reaching a contradiction, it demonstrates that the initial assumption was false, and therefore the opposite must be true. Hence, the theorem is proven to be valid: the average of any two real numbers is indeed less than or equal to at least one of the two numbers.

Learn more about proof by contradiction at:

brainly.com/question/30459584

#SPJ11

The completion time for the 200-meter backstroke for a female with a z-score of −1.64 is given as follows:

129.5 seconds.

We must use the z-score formula, as follows:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

In which:

The parameters for this problem are given as follows:

[tex]Z = -1.64, \mu = 141, \sigma = 7[/tex]

Hence the z-score is given as follows:

-1.64 = (X - 141)/7

X - 141 = -1.64 x 7

X = 129.5.

More can be learned about the normal distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25800303

#SPJ4

The given points A(−2,1), B(2,5), C(6,−1) and D(4,−7) are joined together to form a quadrilateral. Points P, Q, R and S are the midpoints of AB, BC, CD, and DA respectively. We have to prove that PQRS is a parallelogram by proving the diagonals have the same midpoint. Let us draw the quadrilateral ABCD as shown in the figure.

Quadrilateral ABCD with midpoints of sides P, Q, R and S. Since P and R are midpoints of sides AB and CD respectively, therefore PR is the midline of trapezium ABCD. And PS is the midline of trapezium ADCB. It is a well-known fact that the midline of a trapezium is parallel to the bases of the trapezium. Hence, PQ is parallel to AD and SR is parallel to BC.The position of the midpoints of a line segment can be found by using the midpoint formula given as: Midpoint of a line segment = (x1+x2/2,y1+y2/2)Answer in more than 100 words:Let's consider the midpoints of line segments AD and BC. Let M be the midpoint of line segment AD. Then the coordinates of M are given by: (x1 + x2/2, y1 + y2/2) = (−2 + 4/2, 1 + (−7)/2) = (1, −3)Now, let N be the midpoint of line segment BC. Then the coordinates of N are given by: (x1 + x2/2, y1 + y2/2) = (2 + 6/2, 5 + (−1)/2) = (4, 2)We have to show that the diagonals PR and QS intersect at the same midpoint. Let O be the midpoint of PR. Then the coordinates of O are given by: (x1 + x2/2, y1 + y2/2) = (−2 + 6/2, 1 + (−1)/2) = (2, 1/2)Now, let O' be the midpoint of QS. Then the coordinates of O' are given by: (x1 + x2/2, y1 + y2/2) = (2 + 4/2, 5 + (−3)/2) = (3, 1/2)Since O and O' have the same y-coordinate, therefore PQRS is a parallelogram. The given quadrilateral ABCD with midpoints P, Q, R and S is proved to be a parallelogram by proving that its diagonals PR and QS have the same midpoint. Therefore, PQRS is a parallelogram.

To know more about parallelogram:

brainly.com/question/28854514

#SPJ11

Part A: The two factors are 4 and (8 - 3x).

Part B: The first factor has one term, and the second factor has two terms.

We have,

Part A:

The expression 4(8 - 3x) consists of two factors.

The first factor is coefficient 4, which multiplies the entire expression within the parentheses.

The second factor is (8 - 3x), which represents the expression inside the parentheses.

Part B:

To determine the number of terms in each factor, we need to identify the terms within the parentheses and the term created by the coefficient.

Within the parentheses, we have two terms: 8 and -3x.

The term 8 is a constant, while -3x is a variable term with a coefficient of -3 and the variable x.

Therefore, there are two terms within the second factor.

The coefficient 4 is considered a single term in itself because it is a constant value.

Thus, there is one term in the first factor.

Thus,

Part A: The two factors are 4 and (8 - 3x).

Part B: The first factor has one term, and the second factor has two terms.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ4

The only solution for the equation 3cos(3θ) - 8 = -11 on the interval [0°, 360°) is θ = 60° or 180°. By rearranging the equation and applying inverse trigonometric functions, we find that this value satisfies the equation.

To find the solutions for the equation 3cos(3θ) - 8 = -11 on the interval [0°, 360°), we can solve for θ by rearranging the equation and using inverse trigonometric functions.

First, let's simplify the equation:

3cos(3θ) = -11 + 8

3cos(3θ) = -3

cos(3θ) = -1

Taking the inverse cosine (arc cos) of both sides, we get:

3θ = arc cos(-1)

The value of arc cos(-1) is π, so we have:

3θ = π

Now, we solve for θ by dividing both sides by 3:

θ = 60°

Therefore, the solution to the equation 3cos(3θ) - 8 = -11 on the interval [0°, 360°) is  θ = 60° or 180°.

Learn more about ”inverse cosine ” here:

brainly.com/question/32042722

#SPJ11

The quadratic function with the given properties has zeros at 2 and 3 and satisfies f(1) = 12. The quadratic function with zeros at 2 and 3 and f(1) = 12 is given by f(x) = 6(x^2 - 5x + 6).

To form a quadratic function with the given properties, we start by considering the zeros (or roots) of the function, which are given as 2 and 3. Zeros indicate the values of x where the function equals zero. We can write the factors of the quadratic function as (x - 2) and (x - 3) since these expressions become zero when x is equal to 2 and 3, respectively.

To find the quadratic function, we multiply these factors together. Multiplying (x - 2) and (x - 3) gives us the quadratic function f(x) = (x - 2)(x - 3). Expanding this equation results in f(x) = x^2 - 5x + 6, which represents the quadratic function with the desired zeros.

Now, we need to ensure that f(1) equals 12. Evaluating f(1) by substituting x = 1 into the quadratic function gives us f(1) = 1^2 - 5(1) + 6 = 1 - 5 + 6 = 2. However, we want f(1) to equal 12. To achieve this, we can scale the entire quadratic function by a factor of 6. The final quadratic function that satisfies the given properties is f(x) = 6(x^2 - 5x + 6), where f(1) does indeed equal 12.

To learn more about quadratic function click here:

brainly.com/question/18958913

#SPJ11

The numbers 1 through 9 can be divided into three groups, {1, 5, 9}, {3, 4, 8}, and {2, 6, 7}, where the sum of the numbers in each group is 15.

Here is one way to divide the numbers 1 through 9 into three groups so that the sum of the numbers in each group is the same:

Group 1: 1, 5, 9

Group 2: 3, 4, 8

Group 3: 2, 6, 7

The sum of the numbers in each group is 15. This can be verified by adding the numbers in each group together.

Group 1: 1 + 5 + 9 = 15

Group 2: 3 + 4 + 8 = 15

Group 3: 2 + 6 + 7 = 15

This is just one possible way to divide the numbers 1 through 9 into three groups so that the sum of the numbers in each group is the same. There are many other possible ways to do this.

Learn more about numbers  here

https://brainly.com/question/25734188

#SPJ4

Sharon can use the equation:

300c = 300(c - 0.20)

To find the average amount the cable company charges per channel, Sharon can set up an equation based on the information provided. Let's break it down:

Let c be the average amount the cable company charges per channel.

The cable bill for 300 channels would be 300c (300 channels multiplied by the average amount per channel).

The salesperson from Great Vista Satellite offers the same 300 channels for $0.20 less per channel, so the cost per channel would be (c - 0.20).

The monthly satellite bill is given as $180.

Setting up the equation:

300c = 300(c - 0.20)

Simplifying the equation:

300c = 300c - 60

60 = 300c - 300c

60 = 0

The equation Sharon can use to find c, the average amount the cable company charges per channel, is 300c = 300(c - 0.20). By solving this equation, she can determine the value of c and find out the average amount the cable company charges per channel.

To know more about cost visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28147009

#SPJ11

The limit of the sequence [tex]{3n^2 - 37n^2 + 8}[/tex] as n approaches infinity is 37. This can be shown using the definition of the limit of a sequence, which states that a sequence {an} approaches a limit L if for any positive number ε, there exists a positive integer N such that for all n greater than or equal to N, the absolute value of (an - L) is less than ε.

To prove that the limit is 37, let ε be a positive number. We need to find a positive integer N such that for all n greater than or equal to N, [tex]|(3n^2 - 37n^2 + 8) - 37|[/tex]< ε.

Simplifying the expression inside the absolute value, we have [tex]|(-34n^2 + 8) - 37|[/tex].

To make this expression less than ε, we can choose N to be any positive integer greater than √((ε + 29)/17). This is because for all n greater than or equal to N, the term -34n² dominates the expression, and as n increases, the term becomes arbitrarily large and negative.

Therefore, by choosing N to be a positive integer greater than sqrt((ε + 29)/17), we can ensure that |(-34n² + 8) - 37| < ε for all n greater than or equal to N. This proves that the limit of the sequence {3n² - 37n² + 8} as n approaches infinity is indeed 37.

Learn more about integer here: https://brainly.com/question/199119

#SPJ11

The horizontal cross-section of the rectangular prism has

It is in the attachment below.

A rectangular prism is a three dimensional object with a rectangular cross-section.

Given the rectangular prism with

We desire to find the orientation of its horizontal cross-section. We proceed as follows.

To draw the horizontal cross-section, we see that the horizontal cross-section of the prism is a plane parallel to the base of the prism.

So, it is a rectangle with

So, using the graph we find the horizontal cross-section of the rectangular prsm in the attachment.

Learn more about horizontal cross-section of rectangular prism here:

https://brainly.com/question/897722

#SPJ1

The total amount of money Jessica paid to rent the apartment for 6 years is $54,120.61.

   In the first year, Jessica paid $8,756.85 for rent.

   For the subsequent years, the rent increased by 1.95% annually.

To calculate the rent for each year, we can use the following formula:

New rent = Previous year's rent + (1.95% of Previous year's rent)

Let's calculate the rent for each year:

Year 2:

New rent = $8,756.85 + (0.0195 * $8,756.85)

New rent = $8,756.85 + $170.71

New rent = $8,927.56

Year 3:

New rent = $8,927.56 + (0.0195 * $8,927.56)

New rent = $8,927.56 + $174.05

New rent = $9,101.61

Year 4:

New rent = $9,101.61 + (0.0195 * $9,101.61)

New rent = $9,101.61 + $177.63

New rent = $9,279.24

Year 5:

New rent = $9,279.24 + (0.0195 * $9,279.24)

New rent = $9,279.24 + $180.94

New rent = $9,460.18

Year 6:

New rent = $9,460.18 + (0.0195 * $9,460.18)

New rent = $9,460.18 + $184.26

New rent = $9,644.44

To find the total amount paid, we add up the rent for all 6 years:

Total amount = Rent for year 1 + Rent for year 2 + Rent for year 3 + Rent for year 4 + Rent for year 5 + Rent for year 6

Total amount = $8,756.85 + $8,927.56 + $9,101.61 + $9,279.24 + $9,460.18 + $9,644.44

Total amount = $54,120.61

Therefore, Jessica paid a total of $54,120.61 to rent the apartment for 6 years.

To learn more about Jessica - brainly.com/question/15872426

#SPJ11

Given:

There are 2 male applicants and 3 female applicants for two vacant positions at a company.

Using the concept of probability-

(a). The probability that two females will be hired is given by:

P (hiring 2 female applicants) = number of ways of selecting 2 female applicants out of 3 female applicants / number of ways of selecting 2 applicants out of 5 applicants.

Number of ways to select 2 female applicants out of 3 female applicants = 3C2 = 3.

Number of ways to select 2 applicants out of 5 applicants = 5C2 = 10

P (hiring 2 female applicants) = 3/10.

Hence, the probability that two females will be hired is 3/10.

(b). The probability that two males will be hired is given by:

P (hiring 2 male applicants) = number of ways of selecting 2 male applicants out of 2 male applicants / number of ways of selecting 2 applicants out of 5 applicants.

Number of ways to select 2 male applicants out of 2 male applicants = 2C2 = 1.

Number of ways to select 2 applicants out of 5 applicants = 5C2 = 10.

P (hiring 2 male applicants) = 1/10.

Hence, the probability that two males will be hired is 1/10.

(c). The probability that one male and one female will be hired is given by:

P (hiring 1 male and 1 female) = number of ways of selecting 1 male applicant and 1 female applicant / number of ways of selecting 2 applicants out of 5 applicants.

Number of ways to select 1 male applicant out of 2 male applicants = 2C1 = 2.

Number of ways to select 1 female applicant out of 3 female applicants = 3C1 = 3.

Number of ways to select 2 applicants out of 5 applicants = 5C2 = 10.

P (hiring 1 male and 1 female) = (2*3)/10 = 6/10.

Hence, the probability that one male and one female will be hired is 6/10.

For more questions related to Probability, refer to:

https://brainly.in/question/20798570

#SPJ11

For the probability distribution of a discrete random variable x, the sum of all values of x must be equal to 1.

We have,

The sum of all values of a discrete random variable x in its probability distribution should be equal to 1 because the probability distribution represents the likelihood of each possible value occurring.

In other words, the probabilities assigned to each value of x should account for all possible outcomes and collectively add up to the total probability of 1, which represents the certainty or 100% likelihood of an event occurring.

In a probability distribution, each value of x has an associated probability assigned to it.

These probabilities must satisfy two conditions: they must be non-negative (greater than or equal to 0) and their sum must be equal to 1. This ensures that the total probability accounts for all possible outcomes and covers the entire sample space.

By summing up the probabilities for all values of x in the probability distribution, we can verify if they add up to 1. If the sum is not equal to 1, it implies that there is an error in the probability distribution, and it needs to be adjusted to meet the requirement of a valid probability distribution.

Thus,

For the probability distribution of a discrete random variable x, the sum of all values of x must be equal to 1.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ4

The complete question:

For the probability distribution of a discrete random variable x, the sum of all values of x must be?

Tim needs to tutor for at most 19 hours to afford his new DVD player the inequality is h ≤ 19

Let's denote the number of hours Tim needs to tutor as h.

Tim earns $16.50 per hour tutoring.

Tim wants to earn at most $313.50 to afford a new DVD player.

We can set up an inequality to represent the number of hours Tim needs to tutor in order to afford the DVD player:

16.50h ≤ 313.50

This inequality states that the total amount earned (16.50h) must be less than or equal to $313.50.

To solve the inequality for h, we can divide both sides by 16.50:

h ≤ 313.50 / 16.50

Simplifying the right side:

h ≤ 19

Therefore, Tim needs to tutor for at most 19 hours to afford his new DVD player.

To know more about inequality click here :

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ4

Tim needs to tutor at most 19 hours to afford his new DVD player.

Given information is:

Tim earned $16.50 per hour tutoring last month.

Tim wants to earn at most $313.50 so he can buy a new DVD player.

To find:

Write and solve an inequality to represent how many hours, h, Tim needs to tutor to afford his new DVD player.

Also, graph the inequality.

Solution:

Let "h" be the number of hours Tim needs to tutor to afford his new DVD player.

Then, his total earnings would be:

16.5h <= 313.5

[As Tim wants to earn at most $313.50, which is less than or equal to $16.50 per hour, h]

Now, we will solve for "h":

Divide both sides by 16.5h <= 313.5 / 16.5h <= 19

Thus, Tim needs to tutor at most 19 hours to afford his new DVD player.

Now, let's graph the inequality:

To graph the inequality, we will draw a horizontal line at "h = 19" as it is the maximum number of hours Tim can tutor. Then, we shade the area left to the line as it represents the solutions that are less than 19.

The inequality will look like this:

Graph of 16.5h ≤ 313.5, where "h" represents the number of hours Tim needs to tutor to afford his new DVD player.

The graph shows that Tim can afford his new DVD player if he tutors for at most 19 hours.

Learn more about inequality from:

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ11

For a quadrilateral with one diagonal  = 9 cm, the sum of perpendiculars from opposite vertices on it is 12 cm, area of quadrilateral = (9/2) × √(2BC² + (12 – p2 – p4)²) + (12 – p2 – p4)/2.

Formula used: Area of quadrilateral = [d1d2 + (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4)]/2, Where,d1 and d2 are diagonals p1, p2, p3 and p4 are perpendiculars from opposite vertices on it.

To find: Area of quadrilateralSolution: Let ABCD be a quadrilateral in which diagonal AC = 9 cmLet p1 and p3 be perpendiculars from vertices A and C on diagonal BD respectively, and p2 and p4 be perpendiculars from vertices B and D on diagonal AC respectively.

By using Pythagoras' theorem, we can calculate the length of BD.

BD² = AB² + AD²BD² = BC² + CD².

From right triangles ABC and ADC, we can get AB² + p2² = 9² ….. (1)AD² + p4² = 9² ….. (2)

From right triangles BCD and ABD, we can get BC² + p3² = BD² ….. (3)

AB² + p1² = BD² ….. (4)

Adding (3) and (4), we get: 2AB² + p1² + p3² = 2BD²

From equations (1) and (2), we get: 2AB² + p1² + p3² = AB² + p2² + AD² + p4²

Substituting AB² + AD² = BD² – BC² in the above equation, we get:

p1² + p3² = p2² + p4² + 2BC²

Using the formula of area of quadrilateral, we have area of quadrilateral = [d1d2 + (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4)]/2= [9 × BD + (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4)]/2= [9 × √(2BC² + p1² + p3²) + (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4)]/2= (9/2) × √(2BC² + p1² + p3²) + (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4)/2

The sum of perpendiculars from opposite vertices on a diagonal is 12 cm.

Therefore,p1 + p3 = 12 – p2 – p4

We substitute this in the above equation to get:

Area of quadrilateral= (9/2) × √(2BC² + (12 – p2 – p4)²) + (12 – p2 – p4)/2.

This is the required solution.

Learn more about Pythagoras' theorem at:

brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ11

The four chief weaknesses of Mesopotamian mathematics were their lack of a formalized system of notation, limited understanding of abstract concepts, absence of proofs, and reliance on concrete examples.

Mesopotamian mathematics, while impressive for its time, had several weaknesses that limited its advancement. Firstly, one of the chief weaknesses was the absence of a formalized system of notation. Unlike later mathematical systems that employed symbols to represent numbers and operations, Mesopotamian mathematics relied heavily on verbal descriptions and geometric diagrams. This lack of a standardized notation made complex calculations and the representation of abstract concepts challenging.

Secondly, Mesopotamian mathematics had a limited understanding of abstract concepts. Their mathematical knowledge was primarily practical and focused on solving real-life problems such as measuring fields, building structures, and conducting trade. They excelled in arithmetic and geometry related to these practical applications but struggled with more abstract mathematical concepts, such as algebra and formalized proofs.

Thirdly, the Mesopotamians did not have a concept of proof in their mathematical practice. While they had algorithms and methods for solving problems, they did not develop a systematic approach to proving mathematical statements. This absence of rigorous proof limited their ability to explore and establish general mathematical principles.

Lastly, Mesopotamian mathematics heavily relied on concrete examples and specific cases. They often approached mathematical problems by providing solutions to specific scenarios rather than developing general formulas or principles. This empirical approach hindered the development of broader mathematical theories and hindered the advancement of mathematics as a discipline.

In summary, the chief weaknesses of Mesopotamian mathematics were the lack of a formalized system of notation, limited understanding of abstract concepts, absence of proofs, and reliance on concrete examples. These limitations prevented the Mesopotamians from achieving a higher level of mathematical abstraction and hindered the development of more sophisticated mathematical theories. However, their contributions laid the foundation for future mathematical advancements in other civilizations.

Learn more about Mesopotamian mathematics here:

https://brainly.com/question/13266040

#SPJ11

The expression 5 × [(2 × 2.4) + 3.2] - 24 equals 29.6.

To solve the expression, we need to follow the order of operations, which is commonly known as PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division from left to right, Addition and Subtraction from left to right).

First, we solve the expression within the parentheses:

2 × 2.4 = 4.8

(2 × 2.4) + 3.2 = 4.8 + 3.2 = 8

Now, we substitute the value back into the main expression:

5 × 8 - 24

Next, we perform the multiplication:

5 × 8 = 40

Finally, we subtract:

40 - 24 = 16

Therefore, the expression 5 × [(2 × 2.4) + 3.2] - 24 equals 16.

By following the order of operations, we simplify the expression and find that the value is 16.

To know more about expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

The power series representation for the given function centered at x = 0 is Σ (-1)ⁿxⁿ from n = 1 to ∞.

The given function is

f(x) = 7/(1 - x²).

We know that

1/(1 - x) = Σ xⁿ, for |x| < 1.

Hence,

f(x) = 7/(1 - x²)

= 7/(1 - x)(1 + x)

= 7[1/(1 - x) - 1/(1 + x)]

∴ f(x) = 7[x + x² + x³ + .... - x - x² - x³ - ... ]

∴ f(x) = 7(x - x² + x³ - x⁴ + .... )

Therefore, the power series representation for the given function centered at x = 0 is Σ (-1)ⁿxⁿ from n = 1 to ∞.

To know more about power series, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32614100

#SPJ11

The composition f ∘ g, g ∘ f, and g ∘ g are determined. In the given scenario, f(x) = 3x − 9 and g(x) = x³ + 9. The composition f ∘ g is calculated as 3(g(x)) − 9, g ∘ f is calculated as (f(x))³ + 9, and g ∘ g is calculated as (g(x))³ + 9.

To find f ∘ g, we substitute g(x) into f(x), resulting in f(g(x)) = f(x³ + 9) = 3(x³ + 9) − 9 = 3x³ + 27 − 9 = 3x³ + 18. This means f ∘ g(b) = 3b³ + 18.

For g ∘ f, we substitute f(x) into g(x), resulting in g(f(x)) = g(3x − 9) = (3x − 9)³ + 9. Expanding this expression, we get g ∘ f(c) = (3c − 9)³ + 9.

Finally, for g ∘ g, we substitute g(x) into itself, resulting in g(g(x)) = g(x³ + 9) = (x³ + 9)³ + 9. This yields the expression g ∘ g = (x³ + 9)³ + 9.

In summary, f ∘ g is 3x³ + 18, g ∘ f is (3c − 9)³ + 9, and g ∘ g is (x³ + 9)³ + 9.

Learn more about composition here:

https://brainly.com/question/30660139

#SPJ11

To determine how many pages Sydney needs to accommodate her collection of 584 coins, we divide the total number of coins by the number of coins per page, which is 12. The quotient will give us the number of pages required. Therefore, Sydney needs 49 pages to accommodate her collection of 584 coins, with each page holding 12 coins.

Given: Sydney has 584 coins and each page can hold 12 coins.

To find: The number of pages Sydney needs.

To calculate the number of pages, we divide the total number of coins by the number of coins per page:

Number of pages = Total number of coins / Number of coins per page

Substituting the given values:

Number of pages = 584 coins / 12 coins per page

Performing the division:

Number of pages = 48.6667

Since we cannot have a fraction of a page, we round up to the nearest whole number, which is 49.

Therefore, Sydney needs 49 pages to accommodate her collection of 584 coins, with each page holding 12 coins.

Learn more about division here:

https://brainly.com/question/2273245

#SPJ11

The flat fee of the first car rental company is $50, and the second car rental company charges a flat fee plus an additional cost per day.

To find out the absolute value of the difference between the flat fees charged by the two companies, we have to compare the first company's flat fee with the second company's flat fee. It is given in the question that the flat fee charged by the second company is $150. Therefore, the absolute value of the difference in dollars between the flat fees the two companies charge is $|50 - 150| = $|(-100)| = 100.The absolute value of the difference, in dollars, between the flat fees the two companies charge is $100.    

Learn more on dollars here:

brainly.com/question/29846475

##SPJ11

Proportion of respondents say Internet has been a good thing for them personally for 95% confidence interval  is 0.8412 to 0.9588, or 84.12% to 95.88%.

Sample proportion (p) = 0.90 (90%)

Confidence interval = 95 %

To develop a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of respondents who say the Internet has been a good thing for them personally,

use the formula,

Confidence Interval = sample proportion ± z × standard error

First, calculate the standard error (SE),

which represents the measure of uncertainty in estimating the true population proportion.

The formula for SE is,

SE = √[(p× (1 - p)) / n]

where p is the sample proportion and n is the sample size.

Since the sample proportion is given as 0.90 and no sample size is provided,

Assuming that the sample size is sufficiently large (generally recommended to be at least 30) and using the information,

we can approximate the standard error using the formula,

SE ≈ √[(p × (1 - p)) / n]

Since the sample size is not provided,

Assume a sample size of 100 for demonstration purposes.

SE ≈ √[(0.90 × (1 - 0.90)) / 100]

SE ≈ √[0.09 / 100]

SE ≈ √0.0009

SE ≈ 0.03

The critical value (z) corresponding to a 95% confidence level.

For a standard normal distribution, the critical value for a 95% confidence level is approximately 1.96.

Using the formula for the confidence interval, calculate the lower and upper bounds of the interval,

Lower Bound = p - z × SE

Upper Bound = p + z × SE

Lower Bound = 0.90 - 1.96 × 0.03

⇒Lower Bound = 0.90 - 0.0588

⇒Lower Bound ≈ 0.8412

Upper Bound = 0.90 + 1.96 × 0.03

⇒Upper Bound = 0.90 + 0.0588

⇒Upper Bound ≈ 0.9588

Therefore, 95% confidence interval for proportion of respondents who say Internet has been a good thing for them personally is 0.8412 to 0.9588, or 84.12% to 95.88%.

Learn more about confidence interval here

brainly.com/question/14241148

#SPJ4

The point (3/5, 4) does not lie on the circle with center (0, -2) and radius 7.

Given the center of the circle with radius 7 is (0, -2), and the point to be determined is (3/5, 4).

To determine if (3/5, 4) lies on the circle with radius 7 centered at (0, -2), we will use the Distance Formula and the equation of a circle.

Distance Formula:

The distance formula is used to calculate the distance between two points. It is derived from the Pythagorean theorem and can be used to determine the length of the sides of a right-angled triangle.

The formula for calculating the distance between two points is given as:

d = √((x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)²)

Equation of a Circle:

The equation of a circle with center (h, k) and radius r is given as:

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²

Let's use the equation of a circle to determine if the point (3/5, 4) lies on the circle with center (0, -2) and radius 7.

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r², where (h, k) is the center and r is the radius.

Substituting h = 0, k = -2, and r = 7 into the equation gives:

(x - 0)² + (y - (-2))² = 7²

x² + (y + 2)² = 49

Now, substituting the coordinates of the point (3/5, 4) into the equation gives:

(3/5)² + (4 + 2)² = 49

This simplifies to:

9/25 + 36 = 49 ⇒ 9/25 + 900/25 = 49/25 ⇒ 909/25 = 49/25

Therefore, the point (3/5, 4) does not lie on the circle with center (0, -2) and radius 7.

To learn more about circle, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/12930236

#SPJ11