Didion portrays marriage in Las Vegas as a hollow, meaningless ritual that has been stripped of all its cultural and emotional significance. She concludes by suggesting that the city's wedding industry is a reflection of the broader cultural values, which she characterizes as shallow.
"Marriage is distinctly and repeatedly excluded from heaven. Is that because it is thought likely to mar the general felicity?" These are the opening lines of Joan Didion's essay "Marrying Absurd," in which she describes the act of marriage in Las Vegas.
Didion's tone is one of biting sarcasm, as she examines the kitschy, commercialized version of marriage that has emerged in the city. She writes about the "instant weddings" that are performed by ordained ministers at drive-through chapels, and the "gimmicky" packages that include everything from Elvis impersonators to live streaming of the ceremony.
Didion argues that the Las Vegas wedding industry is a reflection of the culture of the city itself, which is built on the idea of instant gratification and the pursuit of pleasure. She writes that "the business of catering to people who are in a hurry to get divorced has developed in Las Vegas as in no other place.
Know more about cultural values here:
https://brainly.com/question/31375471
#SPJ11
Under the OSH Act, employees have the following rights except which of the following?
A. Refusal to wear safety equipment
B. File a safety and health grievance
C. Participate in OSHA inspections
D. Participate in union activities concerning job safety and health
Under the OSH Act, employees have the following rights except which of A. Refusal to wear safety equipment.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act, employees have several rights related to safety and health in the workplace, including the right to file a safety and health grievance, the right to participate in OSHA inspections, and the right to participate in union activities concerning job safety and health.
However, employees do not have the right to refuse to wear safety equipment if such equipment is required for their job and is determined to be necessary for their safety and health by their employer.
To learn more about employees, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/21847040
#SPJ11
T/F The Supreme Court has no discretion over the cases it hears each term.
The given statement "The Supreme Court has no discretion over the cases it hears each term." is false because the Supreme Court does have discretion over the cases it hears each term.
The Court exercises this discretion through a process known as "granting certiorari" or "granting cert." The Court receives a vast number of requests, known as petitions for writs of certiorari, from parties seeking the Court's review of lower court decisions.
The Supreme Court has the authority to choose which cases it will hear, and it typically selects cases that raise significant legal questions, involve conflicting interpretations of federal law, or present constitutional issues of national importance. The Court's discretionary power allows it to prioritize cases that have the potential to impact the interpretation of laws and shape legal precedents.
The Court's discretion is crucial for managing its workload and ensuring that it focuses on cases that warrant the attention of the highest court in the land. The Court receives thousands of petitions each year but only grants certiorari to a limited number of cases, typically around 100 or fewer.
Know more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
fed statement indicates the political leaders are supportive of policy?
The Federal Reserve (Fed) statement often reflects the views and intentions of policymakers regarding the economy. When the statement indicates that political leaders are supportive of the Fed's policy,
it suggests that there is alignment between the government and the central bank on economic goals and strategies.
This support can lead to more effective implementation of monetary policies, such as controlling inflation and promoting employment. In turn, this collaboration can foster economic stability and growth.
Cooperation between the Fed and political leaders is crucial in creating an environment conducive to businesses and individuals, ultimately benefiting the broader economy.
Learn more about The Federal Reserve at https://brainly.com/question/14986553
#SPH11
which constitutional amendment was intended to provide for the protection of black voters?
The constitutional amendment that was intended to provide for the protection of black voters is the Fifteenth Amendment. It was ratified on February 3, 1870, and it prohibited any state from denying a citizen the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
This amendment was a crucial victory for the civil rights movement and for African Americans who had been denied their right to vote for years. It was designed to protect the voting rights of black men who had been granted the right to vote by the 14th Amendment, but who were still being excluded from voting through discriminatory practices such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and intimidation tactics.The Fifteenth Amendment was a significant milestone in the struggle for equal rights and the protection of minority voting rights. However, it was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that the federal government took action to enforce the amendment and eliminate discriminatory voting practices.Overall, the Fifteenth Amendment remains an essential component of the US Constitution, as it protects the voting rights of all citizens regardless of race, ethnicity, or previous status as a slave.
To know more about amendment visit:
brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ11
You are legally required to include which of the following in gross income?
Alimony received
Illegal income
All of these
Lottery winnings
Al of the following must be included in gross income: alimony received, illegal income, and lottery winnings.
Acording to the IRS, gross income includes all income from whatever source derived, including alimony received, illegal income, and lottery winnings. Alimony received is taxable income to the recipient and must be reported on their tax return. Illegal income, while obtained through illegal means, is still considered taxable income and must be reported on a tax return. Lottery winnings, including prizes and jackpots, are also considered taxable income and must be reported on a tax return.
Learn more about gross income: https://brainly.com/question/19670696
#SPJ11
true/false. crime prevention through environmental design (cpted) applies law enforcement strategies, physical design, and investor participation to build and maintain urban neighborhoods.
The answer is True. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is an approach that combines law enforcement strategies, physical design principles, and community involvement to create and maintain safer urban environments. CPTED aims to prevent crime by designing and managing the built environment in a way that discourages criminal activity and promotes a sense of safety and security.
CPTED principles involve strategies such as:
1. Natural surveillance: Designing spaces to maximize visibility and promote natural surveillance, making it easier for residents and passersby to observe and monitor their surroundings.
2. Access control: Implementing measures to control and manage access to buildings and spaces, such as fencing, lighting, and entry points, to discourage unauthorized entry.
3. Territorial reinforcement: Establishing clear boundaries and delineating ownership of spaces to create a sense of ownership and territoriality among residents, making it less likely for criminals to target those areas.
4. Maintenance and management: Ensuring that the physical environment is well-maintained, with regular upkeep, proper lighting, and clear signage, to signal that the area is cared for and monitored.
5. Community involvement: Encouraging community engagement and participation in the design, maintenance, and management of public spaces, fostering a sense of ownership and collective responsibility for safety.
By combining these elements, CPTED aims to create environments that are less conducive to criminal behavior and more supportive of community well-being.
In conclusion, true. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) utilizes law enforcement strategies, physical design principles, and community involvement to build and maintain urban neighborhoods that are safer and more secure.
To know more about Prevention, visit:
brainly.com/question/14938514
#SPJ11
why guns are not a proven deterrent in the context of burglary
While guns can be used for self-defense, there is no evidence to suggest that owning a gun serves as a proven deterrent in the context of burglary.
There are several reasons why guns are not a proven deterrent for burglaries. First, burglars are often looking for quick and easy targets, and the presence of a gun in a home may not deter them if they believe they can quickly take what they want and leave undetected. Additionally, many burglaries occur when the homeowners are away from the property, meaning that the gun would not be accessible for self-defense anyway.
Furthermore, owning a gun can actually increase the risk of violence in a burglary situation. If a homeowner confronts a burglar with a gun, it can escalate the situation and increase the likelihood of injury or death for both parties. Additionally, there is the risk that the gun could fall into the hands of the burglar if they are able to overpower the homeowner.
Overall, while guns can be used for self-defense, they are not a proven deterrent in the context of burglary and can actually increase the risk of violence. Other measures such as alarm systems, security cameras, and secure locks may be more effective in deterring burglars and protecting one's home.
Learn more about burglary: https://brainly.com/question/9930490
#SPJ11
What is the name of the local agency which regulates coffee shops in Florida?
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Establishes standards for food additives used in meat and poultry
Principal Display Panel
The local agency which regulates coffee shops in Florida is typically the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services is responsible for regulating a wide range of industries in the state, including food and agriculture. This includes overseeing the production, processing, and distribution of food products, as well as ensuring that food establishments meet state and federal health and safety standards. In the case of coffee shops, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services would likely be responsible for inspecting the establishment to ensure that it meets health and safety regulations, and that its products are accurately labeled and properly prepared.
In addition to its role in regulating food and agriculture, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services also establishes standards for food additives used in meat and poultry, and oversees a range of other consumer protection activities in the state. The Principal Display Panel is a requirement for food packaging that displays specific information, such as the product name, ingredients, net weight, and nutritional information.
To know more about local agency click here
brainly.com/question/11405748
#SPJ11
Samson is a government employee. Samson is limited in drug testing by the U.S. Constitution's called_________
Samson is limited in drug testing by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment requires that searches and seizures be conducted with a warrant or with probable cause, and that warrants must be supported by oath or affirmation and describe the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. In the case of drug testing, the Supreme Court has held that drug testing is a search under the Fourth Amendment and must meet the Fourth Amendment's requirements for reasonableness. Therefore, government employers like Samson must have a legitimate reason for testing their employees for drugs and must follow certain guidelines to ensure that the testing is reasonable and does not violate employees' Fourth Amendment rights.
To know more about, fourth amendment click here: https://brainly.com/question/7955252
#SPJ11
Which of the following can be said about the concept of a regime?
a. A regime is a set of political institutions that generate and carry out policy.
b. Regimes are most often transformed slowly by the evolving legislative and social preferences of citizens.
c. A regime guides the state regarding individual freedom and collective equality, where power should reside, and how power should be used.
d. A regime may consist of democratically elected legislators, presidents, and prime ministers, or it may be made up of leaders who gained office through force.
All of the above statements can be said about the concept of a regime
So, the correct answer is A, B, C and D.
The concept of a regime refers to the set of political institutions that generate and carry out policy. It is a guide that dictates the state's stance on individual freedom and collective equality, power distribution, and usage.
The regime may consist of democratically elected leaders or those who gained office through force. It is not often transformed quickly but rather evolves slowly, influenced by the changing legislative and social preferences of citizens.
A regime's stability is influenced by its ability to adapt to changing circumstances, respond to citizens' needs and demands, and maintain a balance of power.
Ultimately, the success of a regime depends on its ability to provide stable and effective governance that meets the needs of its citizens.
Hence, the answer of the question is A, B, C and D..
Learn more about political institutions at
https://brainly.com/question/14424848
#SPJ11
the outcome of a trihybrid cross is predicted by the law of segregation.
True or False
The statement that the outcome of a trihybrid cross is predicted by the law of segregation is True.
The law of segregation, also known as Mendel's first law, states that pairs of alleles separate or segregate during gamete formation, and each gamete receives only one allele from each parent.
This means that the outcome of a trihybrid cross, which involves the inheritance of three different traits, can be predicted based on the segregation of alleles during meiosis.
For example, if a plant with the genotype AABBCC is crossed with a plant with the genotype aabbcc, the offspring will all be heterozygous for each trait (AaBbCc).
This is because during meiosis, the alleles for each trait segregate independently of one another, resulting in eight different gamete combinations (AB, Ab, aB, ab, AC, Ac, aC, ac).
By using the principles of the law of segregation, along with the law of independent assortment, it is possible to predict the probability of particular phenotypes and genotypes in the offspring of a trihybrid cross or any other type of genetic cross.
This knowledge is essential in fields such as genetics and biotechnology, where understanding inheritance patterns is crucial for developing new treatments and therapies.
learn more about meiosis here:
https://brainly.com/question/29383386
#SPJ11
what was congress’s most important legislation to strengthen the banking system as a result of bank failures that were occurring in the 1930s due to the effects of the great depression
The most important legislation passed by Congress to strengthen the banking system in response to the bank failures during the Great Depression in the 1930s was the Banking Act of 1933, also known as the Glass-Steagall Act.
The Glass-Steagall Act had several key provisions aimed at stabilizing the banking sector and restoring public confidence. Here are some of the significant elements of the legislation:
1. Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The act mandated the separation of commercial banking (traditional deposit-taking and lending) from investment banking activities (such as securities underwriting and trading).
It established a clear division between commercial banks and investment banks to prevent the risks associated with speculative investments from impacting the deposits of ordinary individuals.
2. Creation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): The FDIC was established as part of the Glass-Steagall Act. It provided deposit insurance to individual bank accounts, guaranteeing that if a bank failed, depositors would be protected up to a certain amount. This measure aimed to restore confidence in the banking system and prevent bank runs
3. Regulation of Securities Activities: The act established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to regulate securities activities, protect investors, and ensure transparency and fairness in the financial markets.
4. Prohibition of Risky Bank Practices: The Glass-Steagall Act restricted banks from engaging in certain speculative activities, such as investing in the stock market or participating in certain types of securities transactions. It aimed to limit the risks banks could take with their customers' deposits.
The Glass-Steagall Act was a crucial piece of legislation that sought to address the weaknesses in the banking system and provide stability and confidence during a time of financial crisis.
However, it is important to note that significant changes were made to banking regulations over subsequent decades, and the Glass-Steagall Act was eventually repealed in 1999 with the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allowed for greater integration between commercial and investment banking.
To know more about Glass-Steagall Act refer here
brainly.com/question/14054317#
#SPJ11
which of the following describes the view that holds that terrorists join networks of terror because they are homesick while in foreign nations and seek out people with similar backgrounds?
The view that holds that terrorists join networks of terror because they are homesick while in foreign nations and seek out people with similar backgrounds is known as the "root cause theory."
This theory posits that individuals who become involved in terrorism do so because they are marginalized, oppressed, or otherwise dissatisfied with their current circumstances. In this view, terrorists are motivated by a desire for social belonging, and they join terrorist networks in order to find a sense of community and purpose.
Proponents of the root cause theory argue that addressing the underlying social, economic, and political conditions that give rise to terrorism is the most effective way to combat the problem. They believe that by addressing the root causes of terrorism, such as poverty, political oppression, and social exclusion, it is possible to reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies and prevent individuals from joining terrorist networks in the first place.
Critics of the root cause theory, however, argue that it oversimplifies the complex motivations and beliefs of terrorists, and that it ignores the role of ideology and religious extremism in driving terrorist activity. They also point out that not all terrorists come from disadvantaged or marginalized backgrounds, and that some individuals who join terrorist networks are motivated by a desire for power, prestige, or a sense of adventure.
To know more about terrorists, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15203676
#SPJ11
true/false. in her law practice, elise performed the litigation work while her partner handled the transactional law.
True. In Elise's law practice, she primarily focused on litigation work, while her partner specialized in transactional law.
Litigation involves representing clients in court and handling disputes, such as civil lawsuits or criminal defense cases. This work typically includes conducting legal research, drafting pleadings and motions, representing clients in hearings or trials, and negotiating settlements. On the other hand, transactional law pertains to legal matters related to business transactions, contracts, and agreements. This could involve drafting and reviewing contracts, negotiating deals, advising clients on legal issues related to mergers and acquisitions, real estate transactions, or intellectual property matters.
Elise's role in performing litigation work suggests that she is responsible for representing clients in legal disputes, advocating their interests, and ensuring their rights are protected. Her partner's focus on transactional law indicates a specialization in structuring and facilitating business transactions, providing legal advice on contractual matters, and ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations. By dividing their areas of expertise, Elise and her partner can offer comprehensive legal services to their clients, covering both contentious and non-contentious aspects of the law.
Elise's primary responsibility in her law practice is litigation work, while her partner specializes in transactional law. Their complementary roles enable them to effectively serve their clients' needs across a broad range of legal matters.
To know more about Litigation ,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31209879
#SPJ11
a court that holds sessions in various locations within its jurisdiction is called a
A court that holds sessions in various locations within its jurisdiction is commonly known as a circuit court. This type of court serves multiple counties or districts, and is responsible for hearing a wide range of cases, including civil and criminal matters.
Circuit courts are designed to bring the court system to the people, as they allow residents in more remote areas to access justice without having to travel long distances. In some cases, circuit courts may also hold special sessions for specific types of cases, such as family law or juvenile matters.
Overall, circuit courts play a vital role in ensuring that justice is accessible to all members of a community.
To know more about circuit court, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30404502#
#SPJ11
discuss the role of the prosecutor in regards to investigating violent crimes
The role of the prosecutor in investigating violent crimes is to work with law enforcement agencies and other relevant parties to build a strong case against the accused. Prosecutors have a responsibility to seek justice and hold those who commit violent crimes accountable for their actions.
Prosecutors play a crucial role in the investigation of violent crimes because they are responsible for determining whether charges should be filed against a suspect. They must review the evidence gathered by law enforcement agencies to determine whether it is sufficient to bring charges against the accused. If the prosecutor decides to pursue charges, they will work with law enforcement to build a case that proves the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
During the investigation, the prosecutor must also balance the rights of the accused with the safety of the community. This means that the prosecutor must ensure that the accused is given a fair trial while also working to protect the community from violent criminals.
In addition to working with law enforcement to investigate violent crimes, prosecutors also play a role in plea bargaining and sentencing. Prosecutors may negotiate plea deals with defendants in exchange for a guilty plea, and they may recommend a sentence to the judge if the defendant is found guilty.
Overall, the role of the prosecutor in investigating violent crimes is to seek justice and ensure that those who commit violent crimes are held accountable for their actions.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29422434
#SPJ1#SPJ11
which factors may best explain the high number of african americans on death row in the united states?
The high number of African Americans on death row in the United States can be attributed to systemic racism, socioeconomic disparities, biased law enforcement practices, inadequate legal representation, and historical racial injustices.
Systemic racism has deeply rooted itself within various institutions, including the criminal justice system. African Americans have historically faced discrimination and prejudice, resulting in disparities in arrest rates, convictions, and sentencing. Studies have consistently shown that African Americans are more likely to be arrested, charged with more serious crimes, and receive harsher punishments than their white counterparts for similar offenses.
Socioeconomic disparities also contribute to the overrepresentation of African Americans on death row. Poverty and limited access to quality education and healthcare can increase the likelihood of involvement in criminal activities. Economic disadvantages often lead to inadequate legal representation, further exacerbating the disparities in sentencing outcomes.
Biased law enforcement practices, such as racial profiling and targeting of minority communities, can contribute to the disproportionate arrest and conviction rates of African Americans. Unconscious biases and stereotypes can influence police decisions, leading to the over-policing and over-criminalization of African American communities.
Additionally, inadequate legal representation plays a significant role. Many individuals facing capital punishment cannot afford competent legal counsel, resulting in poorly prepared defenses and increased likelihood of conviction. Racial biases within the legal system can also affect jury selection and trial proceedings.
Lastly, historical racial injustices, such as slavery, segregation, and discriminatory policies, have created enduring socioeconomic disadvantages for African Americans. The lingering effects of these injustices continue to shape the social and economic circumstances that contribute to the overrepresentation of African Americans on death row.
Addressing these issues requires comprehensive criminal justice reform, including efforts to eliminate systemic racism, promote equal access to education and economic opportunities, provide adequate legal representation, and increase transparency and accountability within the criminal justice system.
To learn more about African Americans refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28847012
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not a federal law referenced in the textbook that regulates product labeling?
Multiple Choice
The Wool Products Labeling Act
The Fur Products Labeling Act
The Flammable Fabrics Act
The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act
The Conspicuous and Comprehensive Product Labeling Act
The Conspicuous and Comprehensive Product Labeling Act is not a federal law referenced in the textbook that regulates product labeling.
The textbook mentions several federal laws that regulate product labeling, including the Wool Products Labeling Act, the Fur Products Labeling Act, the Flammable Fabrics Act, and the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. These laws require manufacturers to disclose certain information about their products, such as the materials used, the country of origin, and any potential hazards. However, the Conspicuous and Comprehensive Product Labeling Act is not a real federal law. It appears to be a made-up name for illustrative purposes only. Therefore, it is not a law that regulates product labeling and is not mentioned in the textbook.
The other options, including The Wool Products Labeling Act, The Fur Products Labeling Act, The Flammable Fabrics Act, and The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act, are all federal laws that regulate product labeling.
Learn more about product labeling: https://brainly.com/question/28654738
#SPJ11
true/false. once a duty is delegated, it relieves the delegator of his or her own liability to perform the contract.
The given statement "Once a duty is delegated, it does not relieve the delegator of his or her own liability to perform the contrac" is FALSE because Even when a duty is delegated, the delegator remains liable for any failure or breach of the contract.
This is because the delegator is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the delegate performs the duty properly.
Therefore, it is important for the delegator to choose a competent delegate and to provide clear instructions and supervision to ensure that the duty is performed in accordance with the contract.
In addition, the delegator should ensure that the contract explicitly states the terms of delegation and any limits to the delegate's responsibilities
Learn more about delegation at https://brainly.com/question/31869190
#SPJ11
Which perspective examines the essential components of policy design?
analyze.
The perspective that examines the essential components of policy design is known as the policy analysis perspective.
This viewpoint focuses on the process of developing and putting policies into action by looking at their goals, costs, advantages, and potential effects on various stakeholders.
Policy analysis is a thorough examination of the issue at hand, the potential solutions, and the trade-offs involved.
The goals and objectives of the policy, the intended beneficiaries and the anticipated outcomes, the potential costs and benefits, the institutional and political context, and the implementation process are all crucial elements of policy design that are examined from the perspective of policy analysis.
The unintended repercussions of policies, as well as the necessity of continuing examination and modification to keep policies useful and timely over time, are other factors that policy analysts take into account.
To know more about Policy analysis,
https://brainly.com/question/31557904
#SPJ1
most modern statutes use the unilateral approach to conspiracy crimes. this means that
The unilateral approach to conspiracy crimes means that only one party needs to have the intent to commit a crime for a conspiracy to exist.
The unilateral approach to conspiracy crimes is a legal principle that allows a person to be convicted of conspiracy even if their co-conspirator is acquitted or not found guilty. In other words, under the unilateral approach, a person can be found guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime even if the other members of the conspiracy did not take any steps to carry out the crime. This approach is different from the traditional bilateral approach, which required at least two people to agree to commit a crime before a conspiracy charge could be brought against them.
The unilateral approach has been adopted in most modern statutes because it allows prosecutors to charge and convict a wider range of conspirators. It's important to note that while the unilateral approach allows for broader prosecution of conspiracies, it also requires prosecutors to prove that the defendant had the intent to commit the crime and took some steps towards its completion. Merely discussing a crime or having knowledge of its planning is not sufficient to establish a conspiracy under the unilateral approach.
To know more about, unilateral approach click here: https://brainly.com/question/16011883
#SPJ11
the ""interest group"" or ""conflict"" model of the law argues that the criminal law:
The interest group or conflict model of criminal law argues that criminal law:
1. Reflects the interests and values of powerful groups in society, who use their influence to shape the legal system to serve their interests.
2. Results from conflicts between various groups who compete to have their views represented in the legal system, leading to a constant struggle for control over the law.
3. Often benefits the dominant groups in society, as they can shape criminal laws to maintain their position of power and suppress challenges from other groups.
4. Can lead to the marginalization of less powerful or minority groups, as their interests may not be adequately represented in the legal system.
Overall, the interest group or conflict model views criminal law as a product of power dynamics and competing interests in society, rather than an impartial system of justice.
Learn more about criminal law: https://brainly.com/question/30712009
#SPJ11
the administrator: i is permitted to deny an exemption retroactively ii cannot deny an exemption retroactively iii can vacate a stop order retroactively iv cannot vacate a stop order retroactively
Administrator i is permitted to deny an exemption retroactively and III can vacate a stop order retroactively
Administrators have the power to examine and evaluate exemptions given to people or companies, often referring to regulatory or governing bodies. The administrator may retrospectively revoke an exemption if it is shown to have been granted inadvertently, to have failed to satisfy the requirements or to have been invalid. This implies that the exemption is ignored, even during the time it was first given.
Further, an administrative measure known as a stop order stops or limits specific operations or activities. The administrator has the power to retrospectively revoke or cancel the stop order if they decide it was issued incorrectly, wasn't justified, or the situation has changed. This indicates that even at the time it was first issued, the halt order is regarded as being invalid and having never existed.
Read more about Administrator on:
https://brainly.com/question/32333030
#SPJ4
peter rueter’s study found little association with the mafia and organized crime and referred to organized crime as a _________________, living off its reputation.
Peter Rueter's study found little association with the mafia and organized crime and referred to organized crime as a "phantom menace," living off its reputation.
In his study, Peter Rueter discovered a lack of substantial evidence linking the mafia and organized crime. Instead, he characterized organized crime as a "phantom menace," a term implying that its perceived influence and impact are exaggerated and largely based on reputation rather than concrete evidence.
By referring to organized crime as a "phantom menace," Rueter suggests that the public perception and fear surrounding organized crime may be disproportionate to its actual presence and influence. This view challenges the popular narrative that portrays organized crime as an all-pervasive and highly organized entity with significant control over various aspects of society.
Rueter's findings shed light on the importance of critically examining and questioning prevailing beliefs and assumptions about organized crime. It highlights the potential for media sensationalism and public imagination to contribute to an inflated perception of the power and reach of organized crime groups.
This notion aligns with the idea that the perception of organized crime can be driven by factors such as media portrayals, cultural myths, and collective imagination rather than verifiable data. It serves as a reminder to approach discussions on organized crime with a nuanced understanding and to differentiate between the reality and the perception of its influence.
To learn more about phantom menace refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30387799
#SPJ11
most members of the courtroom work group are essentially part of what class?
The courtroom work group refers to the professionals who participate in the daily operations of the criminal justice system and work together to move cases through the system.
The group typically includes the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, and other court personnel such as clerks, bailiffs, and court reporters. These individuals are part of the occupational class of legal professionals, with specialized education and training in law and criminal justice. The work group operates in a collaborative manner, with each member playing a specific role and relying on the others to fulfill their respective responsibilities. The group's main goal is to ensure that justice is served in each case, while balancing the rights of the accused and the interests of society. The courtroom work group plays a crucial role in the functioning of the criminal justice system and the administration of justice.
To learn more about courtroom work, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15162489
#SPJ11
TRUE OR FALSE if planning analytical procedures identify some unexpected relationships, the auditor would conclude that there may be a heightened risk of material misstatements.
The statement is generally true. When an auditor plans analytical procedures, they are analyzing data and looking for unexpected relationships or patterns that may indicate a risk of material misstatement. If the auditor does identify unexpected relationships during the planning stage.
It suggests that there may be a heightened risk of material misstatement. However, it is important to note that unexpected relationships do not always indicate a heightened risk of material misstatement. There may be other factors at play that are causing the unexpected relationships, such as changes in the company's operations or accounting practices.
Therefore, the auditor should conduct further investigation and gather additional evidence before concluding that there is a heightened risk of material misstatement. In summary, while identifying unexpected relationships during planning analytical procedures can indicate a heightened risk of material misstatement, it is important for the auditor to conduct further investigation and gather additional evidence before reaching a conclusion.
To know more about Analyzing data visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28223777
#SPJ11
After the powers of Congress are enumerated in Article I of the Confederation, there is a clause that says Congress also has the power to enact any law that is “necessary and proper” in exercising its enumerated powers. Another commonly used word for this “necessary and proper” powers is ______.
a) Express power
b) Impressed power
c) Implied power
d) Reserved power
which actor in the criminal justice system is the only official who works with all other actors of the criminal justice system on a daily basis?
The actor in the criminal justice system who works with all other actors on a daily basis is the judge.
As a key figure, the judge interacts with various professionals, including prosecutors, defense attorneys, law enforcement officers, and correctional staff, to ensure a fair and impartial judicial process.
Their role involves presiding over court proceedings, determining the admissibility of evidence, and providing legal guidance to the jury.
Overall, the judge plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and balance of the criminal justice system.
Learn more about judicial system at https://brainly.com/question/31250115
#SPJ11
which statement(s) are true about the tax law changes in 2017? multiple choice congress wanted businesses to invest more in long-lived assets. companies are temporarily allowed to take 100% bonus depreciation in the first year that an asset is placed in service. this bonus will be phased out beginning in 2023 and expire by 2027. all of these are true.
All three statements are true about the tax law changes in 2017.
The Congress wanted to incentivize businesses to invest more in long-lived assets, which led to the implementation of the temporary 100% bonus depreciation for the first year of an asset's service. This means that companies can deduct the entire cost of an eligible asset in the first year of service, rather than spreading it out over several years.
However, this bonus depreciation will begin to be phased out in 2023 and will expire by 2027. These changes were intended to stimulate economic growth by providing businesses with more cash flow to reinvest in their operations and create jobs. All three statements are true about the tax law changes in 2017.
For more about tax law:
https://brainly.com/question/29664519
#SPJ11
by the year 2000, how many domestic violence cases resulted in arrests?
By the year 2000, domestic violence cases had risen to 58%. In 2001, an estimated 691,710 domestic violence cases were reported to law enforcement agencies, and 63% of those cases resulted in an arrest.
Domestic violence cases resulting in arrests have been increasing since the 1980s. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 1994, the police arrested offenders in 49% of domestic violence cases reported to them.
The increase in arrests for domestic violence is due to a variety of factors. One factor is the enactment of mandatory arrest laws in many states, which require the police to make an arrest when they have probable cause to believe that domestic violence has occurred.
Another factor is the increased awareness and training of police officers and prosecutors about the seriousness of domestic violence and the need to hold offenders accountable.
However, despite the increase in arrests, domestic violence continues to be a significant problem in the United States. Many victims are still reluctant to report the abuse or seek help, and many cases go unreported. In addition, the criminal justice system is often criticized for not providing adequate protection to victims or holding offenders accountable.
In conclusion, the number of domestic violence cases resulting in arrests increased from 49% in 1994 to 58% in 2000, and by 2001, an estimated 63% of reported cases resulted in an arrest. However, domestic violence remains a significant problem in the United States, and more needs to be done to protect victims and hold offenders accountable.
To know more about domestic violence refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30297361#
#SPJ11
