In an effort to protect the dwindling California condor population, Congress enacted the Condor Preservation Act, which made it illegal to take or sell any part of a California condor. The constitutionality of the Act is challenged by a seller of gifts and artifacts, including artifacts made out of California condor feathers.
Is the statute valid?
A No, the statute violates due process because the absolute prohibition on sale is an effective taking under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause without just compensation.
B No, because the statute is discriminatory as applied.
C Yes, because the statute is rationally related to interstate commerce.
D Yes, because the statute is designed to protect a dwindling national resource.

Benito Mussolini instituted a governmental system, fascism, stressing nationalism rather than individual liberty. Fascism is a form of government that is characterized by extreme authoritarianism, totalitarianism, nationalism, and a belief in the superiority of one's own race or nation.

It was instituted by Italian dictator Benito Mussolini during the early 20th century, and it later became a political system adopted by other countries, including Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler. Fascist governments are typically highly centralized, with power concentrated in the hands of a single leader or small group of leaders. The government is often characterized by authoritarianism and totalitarianism, with strict control over the media, economy, and society as a whole.

In summary, fascism is a highly authoritarian and nationalist form of government that places the nation or race above the individual. It is characterized by extreme centralized control, militarism, and the use of force to achieve political goals.

To know more about fascism go to

https://brainly.com/question/16475365

#SPJ4

The practice of elected officials giving jobs to political supporters is called patronage.

Political patronage is when a person is hired or appointed to a position in the government on the basis of their partisan allegiance. Such appointments are used by elected officials at the federal, state, and local levels of government to thank and reward supporters. According to Bearfield, patronage should be used to bridge political gaps and forge new coalitions as well as to change the current patronage system.

Other uses for patronage include advancing democratic or egalitarian goals and strengthening or creating political organizations. A patron or superior provided protection and support to a subordinate or client, who owed him loyalty and service in return. Patronage was a system of interpersonal connections.

Learn more about patronage at:

brainly.com/question/29870571

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Constitution grants Congress the power to make laws, declare war, raise and maintain the armed forces, regulate interstate and foreign commerce, tax and spend for the general welfare, and borrow money. Congress also has the power to establish a national currency, regulate immigration, coin money and set its value, establish post offices and roads, and set rules for patents and copyrights.

In Moler v. State, the court allowed the jury to disregard the expert opinion that Moler was legally insane at the time of the offense, stating that the ultimate issue of sanity is a question of law and not a medical or scientific one. The role of precedent in this case is important because it reflects the long-standing legal principle that the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence is a question of fact for the jury, not a question of law for the expert.

The court justified this by arguing that expert testimony on mental state is not binding on the jury and that it is the jury's responsibility to weigh the evidence and decide whether the defendant had the required mental state to commit the crime.

The role of precedent in essential as this principle has been established in previous cases, such as Durham v. United States, where the court held that expert opinion on mental state is admissible but not conclusive.

Therefore, the court in Moler v. State followed the precedent and allowed the jury to decide whether the defendant had the required mental state to commit the crime, based on all the evidence presented, including the expert opinion.

To know more about role of precedent:

https://brainly.com/question/2033336

#SPJ4

_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:

Read Moler v. State Case and answer the following: what justification was offered by the court for permitting the jury to disregard the expert opinion that moler was, in fact, legally insane at the time of the offense? discuss the role of precedent in your response.

The Credit CARD Act of 2009 amended the Truth in Lending Act and requires credit and charge card issuers to provide certain disclosures in direct mail, telephone, and other applications and solicitations for open-ended credit and charge accounts and under other circumstances.

In order to give customers further rights in relation to billing problems and unlawful charges on credit and charge accounts, the FCBA was passed in 1974 and updated TILA.

According to the FCBA, credit and charge card issuers must give customers a billing statement that includes details about their accounts as well as how to challenge billing inaccuracies and unauthorized payments.

Additionally, it places restrictions on a consumer's liability for unauthorized charges and calls for the creditor to look into billing problems very away.

For such more question on Act:

https://brainly.com/question/29553499

#SPJ11

A Member of Congress is elected to represent their constituents. The congress main work is to promote their interests, expressing their viewpoints etc.

An individual who a member of Congress has been chosen to represent is known as a constituent. To put it another way, a constituent is a person who lives in a certain congressional district and has the right to cast a ballot for the lawmaker who will represent that district in the House of Representatives or the Senate.

Addressing the wants and needs of their constituents, promoting their interests, and expressing their viewpoints in Congress are the responsibilities of the representative or senator.

For such more question on Congress:

https://brainly.com/question/16880802

#SPJ11

The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1368 was adopted on 12 September 2001, in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. It strongly condemned the acts, reiterated the UN's determination to combat all forms of terrorism and affirmed the need to bring those responsible to justice.

In response to the terrorist attacks that took place in the United States on September 11, 2001, the United Nations Security Council enacted Resolution 1368 on September 12. The resolution denounced the assaults and reaffirmed the council's commitment to taking all necessary action in response.

This resolution prepared the way for additional responses to the 9/11 attacks by the US and its allies, including as the invasion of Afghanistan and the launch of the global War on Terror.

For such more question on United Nations:

https://brainly.com/question/30674987

#SPJ11

The courts referred to in this statement are the federal courts in the United States.

The U.S. Constitution establishes the federal court system and grants the federal courts the power to hear cases involving federal law or disputes between parties from different states (known as diversity jurisdiction). The Constitution also outlines the powers of the federal courts, including the power of judicial review, which allows the courts to interpret the Constitution and federal laws and strike down laws that are deemed unconstitutional.

In addition to the Constitution, federal laws also define the jurisdiction and powers of the federal courts. For example, the Judiciary Act of 1789 established the basic structure of the federal court system and authorized the creation of lower federal courts, such as the district courts and circuit courts of appeals. Other federal laws have expanded or modified the jurisdiction and powers of the federal courts, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which gave federal courts the power to enforce anti-discrimination laws.

Overall, the power of the federal courts is derived from the U.S. Constitution and federal laws, and they play a critical role in interpreting and enforcing federal law and protecting the rights of citizens.

Learn more about federal laws here brainly.com/question/28498485

#SPJ4

Before the Mexican elections of 2000, the presidential nominee of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) had been chosen by the process of Dedazo.

Dedazo, which literally means "big finger" in Spanish, was a process used by the PRI to select its presidential candidate. It involved the sitting president choosing his successor, often in a secretive and undemocratic manner. This process allowed the PRI to maintain control of the presidency for over 70 years, from 1929 to 2000. However, in the 2000 elections, the PRI lost the presidency for the first time, with Vicente Fox of the National Action Party (PAN) winning the election.

Learn more about elections

https://brainly.com/question/21910013

#SPJ11

Answer:

These points led to integrated crime prevention hope it helps.

Explanation:

The government, criminal justice committees, police, courts, probation service, prison service, and Crown Prosecution Service.

The Fair Credit and Charge Card Disclosure Act (FCCCDA) of 1988 amended the Truth in Lending Act and requires credit and charge card issuers to provide certain disclosures in direct mail, telephone, and other applications and solicitations for open-ended credit and charge accounts, as well as under other circumstances.

By requiring issuers to give uniform disclosures on the fees and conditions of credit card plans, the FCCCDA was passed to encourage consumers' educated use of credit cards.

The annual percentage rate (APR), annual fees, grace period, and other important terms and conditions must all be disclosed by credit and charge card issuers in a clear and straightforward way, according to the law.

The FCCCDA also established standards for the presentation of credit and charge card disclosures and required that they be clearly displayed in applications and solicitations for open-ended credit and charge accounts sent via direct mail, telephone, and other channels.

For such more question on Fair Credit:

https://brainly.com/question/30840840

#SPJ11

The legal right to make decisions affecting children and responsibility for their care is called commitment. Hence, the above statement is False.

A promise is someone who promises to do or not to do something. As a noun, promise refers to a statement that guarantees that one will or will not do something. As a verb, it means to bind by promising to do or give. It can also denote good abilities, similar to values ​​that will be realized in the near future.

Legal rights are a product of law. Therefore, their legal force, i.e. the legal status of law, often derives from other legal norms or legal sources (McCormick 1977: 189 and 206; Sumner 1987: 68-70; Raz 1994: 263-268).

A verbally justified assertion and  an attitude of man assuming ideal and natural rights to life, equality and property in accordance with the laws of nature. The existence of rights presupposes the existence of remedies in the event of violation of rights.

In simple terms, fundamental rights recognized by civilized societies and applied by States. There are many forms of rights, such as natural rights, moral rights, legal rights, etc.

Learn more about Legal Right:

https://brainly.com/question/28024586

#SPJ4

The one that is true for criminal cases is - A prosecutor files charges on behalf of society.

A criminal case is a sort of judicial action in which the defendant is tried for behavior that the state's legislature, or the government, deems to be unlawful. Criminal proceedings often start after the suspect is detained and charged, typically at an indictment hearing. A criminal case is a sort of judicial action in which the defendant is tried for behavior that the state's legislature, or the government, deems to be unlawful. Criminal proceedings often start after the suspect is detained and charged, typically at an indictment hearing.

Learn more on cases here:

brainly.com/question/30035277

#SPJ1

The answer is a. Court decisions defining cruel and unusual punishment involve interpretation of the Eighth Amendment.

This statement  explains how the data in the table was affected by Supreme Court decision making.

Suing someone, taking legal action on someone, or making a try at criminal prosecution all refer to taking someone to court. idiom. We'll probably have to sue them, in my opinion. Since they took our money, I want to file a lawsuit against them.

Fundamental differences between criminal and civil courts, general and restricted jurisdiction courts, and appellate and trial courts must be made. Federal, international, and constitutional courts are also present.

To know more about Court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ1

In the majority of nations, corporations have the same legal privileges as individuals when it comes to owning property, making contracts, and bringing legal actions.

A firm is not a citizen under the Citizenship Act of 1955 or Indian constitutional law, even though it is a legal organization. A company cannot be regarded as a citizen because citizenship is only available to individuals or natural persons and not to legal organizations.

A corporation provides its owners with the highest level of personal asset liability protection when compared to other business structures. For instance, a corporation's owners are not held personally accountable for the debts or legal obligations of the organization even if the assets of the corporation are insufficient to meet the liabilities of the corporation.

Learn more about corporation: https://brainly.com/question/30029715

#SPJ1

Women were granted the right to vote in 1920, which was 36 years after the Constitution was ratified in 1788.

The Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which gave women the right to vote, was first proposed in 1878 and introduced repeatedly in Congress until it was finally passed in 1919. It was then ratified by the necessary three-fourths of the states in 1920.

The amendment reads: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." The amendment was part of the growing women’s rights movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Prior to its passage, some individual states had given women the right to vote, but it was not until the Nineteenth Amendment that women's suffrage was protected by the federal government.

The Nineteenth Amendment was a milestone in the history of the United States. It was a major victory for the women's rights movement, which had been working to secure the vote for women for over a century. It also opened the door for increased political participation by women and gave them a stronger voice in the political process.

Know more about  The right of citizens here:

https://brainly.com/question/921569

#SPJ11    

It can be debatable whether or young offenders' fingerprints and pictures can be taken without their consent. The use of a minor's fingerprints in a criminal prosecution or conviction may result in stigmatization.

Criminal law: Nothing committed by a child under the age of seven constitutes a crime according to the Indian Penal Code. If it is determined that the kid has not yet developed the capacity to comprehend the nature and implications of his act, the age of criminal liability is increased to 12 years.

Juvenile refers to youngsters who are under the age and developmental stage of adults. Juvenile Justice (Care) Act For the purposes of a criminal prosecution and punishment in a court of law, a juvenile shall not be treated as an adult under the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000.

To know more about criminal prosecution visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30648159

A police officer who offers to release an arrested prostitute and file no arrest report if the prostitute will perform a sexual act with the officer is A. guilty of receiving a bribe.

A police officer is guilty of accepting a bribe if they agree to release a prostitute from custody and not file an arrest report in exchange for her engaging in sexual activity with them. Quid pro quo corruption is the term used to describe this form of conduct, which is seen as a major infraction of the law and of professional ethics.

It entails exchanging something valuable in this example, the release and failure to notify the arrest for a personal gain which is the sexual act. This kind of conduct jeopardises the credibility of the police department and could land the offending officer in jail. The other possibilities are not acceptable excuses or defences for this kind of action.

Read more about bribe on:

https://brainly.com/question/30588358

#SPJ4

Kirchhoff's junction law, also known as Kirchhoff's current law, states that the sum of the currents entering a junction is equal to the sum of the currents leaving the junction.

In other words, the total amount of electricity flowing into a junction must equal the total amount of electricity flowing out of the junction.

If we assume all plugs are parallel circuits, then each plug is connected to the same voltage source and the current is divided among the different branches of the circuit. When too many plugs are inserted into a single socket, the total current flowing through the socket increases. According to Kirchhoff's junction law, this increase in current must be equal to the sum of the currents flowing through each of the plugs.

If the total current flowing through the socket exceeds the maximum current rating of the socket, then too much electricity is flowing through the socket and it can cause the socket to overheat and potentially start a fire. Therefore, it is important to limit the number of plugs in a single socket to prevent too much electricity from flowing and causing a potentially dangerous situation.

Learn more about Kirchhoff's junction law

https://brainly.com/question/30265238

#SPJ11

A political party is an organization of ideologically similar people that nominates and elects its members to office in order to run the government and shape public policy.

A political party is a group of people with similar ideologies that nominates and elects its members to office in order to manage the government and direct public policy. Modern democratic systems are characterised by the presence of political parties, which are crucial for voter mobilisation, articulation of policy positions, and political power competition. Political parties often have a core set of beliefs and principles that they utilise to win over and keep supporters. They try to promote these beliefs through a variety of strategies, including public message, media campaigns, and lobbying activities.

For such more question on political:

https://brainly.com/question/30568978

#SPJ11

The Noerr-Pennington Doctrine is an exemption from the Sherman Act that extends to concerted efforts to lobby government officials.

The Sherman Act is a federal law that prohibits monopolies and other anti-competitive business practices. However, the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine allows businesses to work together to lobby government officials for favorable legislation or regulation without being subject to the restrictions of the Sherman Act.

This is because the right to petition the government for redress of grievances is protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, and the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine ensures that businesses can exercise this right without fear of antitrust liability.

The full question is: Which of the following is an exemption from the Sherman Act that extends to concerted efforts to lobby government officials?

Noerr-Pennington Doctrine

Duty-to-deal doctrine

Ker-Frisbie doctrine

See more about Sherman Act at https://brainly.com/question/2119756.

#SPJ11

False.

There are two primary methods for a federal court to have jurisdiction:The issue includes a federal question, which implies that it arises under federal law, the United States Constitution, or a treaty to which the United States is a party.

Federal issue jurisdiction does not need a minimum amount in controversy.Diversity jurisdiction is used when there is a dispute over more than $75,000 between parties who are from different states or countries. The federal court applies state law to diversity matters.Hence, the statement is false since federal courts may have jurisdiction over a matter based on a federal question or diversity of citizenship, but only in diversity cases is the amount in dispute important.

learn more about jurisdiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/12448353

#SPJ4

A conference committee will be formed if the house of origin declines to agree to amendments made by the Assembly to a Senate bill or vice versa. The bill moves to the Governor if the house of origin agrees.

After being released by the committee, the item is put on a calendar to be voted on, discussed, or changed. If it receives a simple majority, the bill is sent to the Senate (218 votes out of 435). If the bill is made public, discussion and voting will take place before it is submitted to another Senate committee.

A legislation cannot be passed and delivered to the President for signature without receiving a majority vote in the House, the Senate, and the President. A vetoed bill may be overridden by enacting it again in each chamber with at least two-thirds of the members of each body voting in favor.

Learn more about Senate committee: https://brainly.com/question/6710063

#SPJ1

A number of governmental measures were put into place to aid Galveston in recovering from the terrible hurricane that struck the city in 1900.

These modifications included the selection of a new governor to lead the state and the creation of a permanent State Board of Health.

This led to stronger catastrophe planning and preparedness techniques as well as a greater emphasis on public health and safety. The city also went through a period of economic revival, which saw a rise in commerce, tourism, and the construction of new infrastructure. The Texas economy eventually became stronger and more rich as a result of this development phase. Finally, after the disaster, Galveston saw political reforms that aided the city's recovery and eventually strengthened the state.

For such more questions on political changes:

brainly.com/question/8898404

#SPJ4

Most state governments are different from the federal government in that they have more power over issues related to education and health care.

A government is a system or institution responsible for making and enforcing rules and regulations, as well as for overseeing the affairs of a political unit, such as a country or city, is known as a government.

The United States has a federal system of government, which means that power is distributed between a central government and the individual states.

The federal government has enumerated powers that are granted to it by the Constitution, while the states have reserved powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government.

The federal government is responsible for a variety of national concerns such as national defense, foreign policy, trade regulation, and monetary policy.

Federal and state governments, on the other hand, have varying levels of control over certain areas of governance.

For such more question on federal government:

https://brainly.com/question/30505220

#SPJ11

Answer:

The federal civil rights law that address harassment within universities is called Tittle IX. Tittle IX allows for students to fight against harassment, sa, r****, discrimination based on s**, and etc.

Explanation:

Answer:

The activists were determined to be antifa by a symbol of vandalism they left on the property if you would like to look into that they are also know to do these things because "The atlanta police department doesn't need anymore racist cops" and non-racist being one of there many things they support that is why they did it most likely.

Explanation:

A coalition of left-wing activists soon moved into the woods after the decision was announced, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, in a bid to prevent the construction. Other left-wing activists such as antifa members, criminal justice reform activists and other environmentalists have also become involved in the protests, the New York Times reported last week.

Protests at "Cop City" hit a fever pitch back in January, when a state trooper shot and killed an environmental activist named Manuel Esteban Paez Teran, 26, who reportedly went by the name Tortuguita and identified as non-binary. Teran was shot after allegedly refusing demands from authorities and firing a gun at state troopers.

Only members of Congress can formally submit a bill for consideration by the chamber.

A bill is a proposed law or legislative act that is presented for consideration to Congress or other legislative bodies. A bill can be presented by any member of Congress, but in the United States, only members of Congress can formally submit a bill for consideration by the chamber.

A bill may be introduced for a variety of reasons, such as addressing a particular issue, responding to a crisis or emergency situation, or correcting flaws or gaps in existing laws or policies.

The process of introducing a bill is a critical step in the legislative process because it initiates the discussion, debate, and compromise that ultimately result in the creation of new laws or the amendment of existing ones.

For such more question on chamber:

https://brainly.com/question/29510119

#SPJ11