The Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers (BREA) is a department of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the state of California. The California BREA received an “Excellent” rating from the ASC in its most recent review. So, the correct option is 1) Excellent.
The Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers (BREA) is a government organization responsible for the licensing and regulation of real estate appraisers in California. BREA is a sub-agency of the California Department of Consumer Affairs, which is responsible for protecting the public by licensing and regulating professionals in various industries. The department's principal mission is to ensure that Californians receive the highest possible standards of service and protection in the real estate appraisal industry.
ASC stands for the Appraisal Subcommittee, which is a government agency that oversees state licensing and certification programs for real estate appraisers. ASC was formed in response to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), which called for the establishment of national standards for real estate appraisers.
To know more about ASC visit: brainly.com/question/28963263
#SPJ11
For tort of Trespass one must prove intent to cause unlawful
harm. The same hurdle must be passed to establish Tort of
Negligence.
Group of answer choices
True
False
For tort of Trespass one must prove intent to cause unlawful harm. The same hurdle must be passed to establish Tort of Negligence. the statement that one must prove intent to cause unlawful harm to establish the tort of negligence is false.
To establish the tort of trespass, one does not need to prove intent to cause unlawful harm. Intent to cause harm is not an essential element of trespass. Trespass generally refers to the unauthorized entry onto another person's property or interference with their possession or use of the property.
Intent to cause harm is more relevant in intentional torts such as assault or battery. In the case of negligence, the tortfeasor's intent is not a requirement. Negligence focuses on a failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person.
Learn more about tort of Trespass
https://brainly.com/question/34630835
#SPJ11
attorney-client privilege means that a defense attorney is not permitted to violate a client's confidentiality for any reason. group of answer choices a. true
b. false
True. The attorney-client privilege means that a defense attorney is not permitted to violate a client's confidentiality for any reason.
Attorney-client privilege is a legal concept that prevents lawyers from disclosing confidential information about their clients without their consent. Clients must be able to speak candidly with their lawyers about their legal issues to get the best possible representation and advice from their lawyers, which is why the law imposes this responsibility on attorneys.
The doctrine of attorney-client privilege applies to any confidential communication between a lawyer and his or her client that is made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice or services. It is important to note that not all communications between a client and a lawyer are privileged. Communications must be made in confidence for the purposes of obtaining or providing legal advice or services to be covered by the privilege.
Learn more about attorney-client privilege: https://brainly.com/question/31847862
#SPJ11
the driver of an automobile was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the death of a cyclist. subsequently, family members of the cyclist initiated a wrongful death action against the driver. in this civil action, the plaintiffs seek to introduce testimony given by a witness at the criminal trial that the witness had observed the driver's reckless speeding less than a minute before the accident with the cyclist. the witness died of natural causes before the wrongful death action began. the driver objected, noting that, although the witness was cross-examined at the criminal trial, the driver's attorney had not, for tactical reasons, made a serious effort to undermine the witness's credibility despite the availability of substantial impeachment information. should the witness's testimony from the manslaughter case be admitted?
The admissibility of the witness's testimony from the manslaughter case in the wrongful death action would depend on the applicable laws and rules of evidence in the jurisdiction where the case is being heard.
Generally, in a civil action like a wrongful death lawsuit, the rules of evidence may differ from those in a criminal trial.
In this situation, the driver is objecting to the admission of the witness's testimony, arguing that their attorney did not make a serious effort to undermine the witness's credibility during the criminal trial. This could be a valid argument for the driver's attorney to make, as the witness's credibility is an important factor in determining the weight and reliability of their testimony.
However, the final decision on whether to admit the witness's testimony would be up to the judge presiding over the wrongful death action. The judge would consider the arguments of both parties, the relevant rules of evidence, and any applicable case law to determine the admissibility of the testimony. Factors such as the importance of the testimony, the availability of impeachment evidence, and the overall fairness of admitting the testimony may also be considered.
To know more about witness's testimony
brainly.com/question/14567392
#SPJ11
when a dispute arises between different countries, the preferred method of resolution is to litigate the case through the foreign court system because it is less expensive and more private to do so. True or False
Litigation in a foreign court system is often time-consuming and expensive. It's also worth noting that in certain circumstances, the laws of a foreign nation may not provide appropriate protection. As a result, countries have established alternate ways of resolving disputes that avoid the need for foreign litigation. Hence, the statement is false.
When a dispute arises between different countries, litigating the case through the foreign court system is not the preferred method of resolution due to several reasons. First, it is false that litigating the case through foreign courts is less expensive. International litigation can be costly due to legal fees, travel expenses, and the need for expert witnesses. Additionally, navigating the foreign legal system may require engaging local counsel, which adds to the overall expense.
Second, it is also false that litigating through foreign courts is more private. International litigation often involves public proceedings and court records, which may be accessible to the public. This can result in a lack of privacy and confidentiality.
Instead of litigation, countries typically prefer alternative methods of dispute resolution, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or diplomatic channels. These methods offer more flexibility, confidentiality, and the potential for a mutually satisfactory resolution without the need for costly and time-consuming court proceedings.
To know more about Litigation visit: brainly.com/question/28542877
#SPJ11
as chief justice, ___________ led the supreme court into a new era of prominence and power.
As Chief Justice, John Marshall led the Supreme Court into a new era of prominence and power.
Marshall served as the fourth Chief Justice of the United States from 1801 to 1835 and played a significant role in shaping the Court's authority and influence. Through landmark cases such as Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland, Marshall established the principle of judicial review and asserted the Court's power to interpret the Constitution.
His decisions solidified the Court's role as the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation and greatly enhanced its stature as a co-equal branch of government.
Learn more about Prominence
https://brainly.com/question/16489495
#SPJ11
