Ishan has 43 pennies, 31 nickels, 21 dimes, 10 quarters and no other coins in his piggy bank. He wants to buy a toy car which cost 3 dollars and 99 cents. Find
A) a smallest number of coins which are worth exactly the price of the toy, so there is no change

B) the smallest number of coins which are worth at least the price of a toy, expecting possible change

C)the largest number of coins which are worth exactly the price of the toy with no change

When the radius of the ripple is 3 feet, the area enclosed by the ripple is increasing at a rate of approximately 50.92 square feet per second.

To understand how the area of the ripple changes over time, let's start with the formula for the area of a circle:

A = πr²

where A is the area and r is the radius of the circle. Since the radius of the ripple is increasing at a constant rate of 2.7 ft/s, we can use the chain rule of differentiation to find the rate of change of the area with respect to time (t):

dA/dt = dA/dr x dr/dt

where dA/dt is the rate of change of the area, dA/dr is the derivative of the area with respect to the radius (which is 2πr), and dr/dt is the rate of change of the radius (which is given as 2.7 ft/s).

Substituting these values into the equation, we get:

dA/dt = 2πr x 2.7

Now, we can plug in the given value of the radius (r = 3 ft) to find the rate of change of the area at that point in time:

dA/dt = 2π(3) x 2.7

= 16.2π

≈ 50.92 ft²/s

To know more about area here

https://brainly.com/question/14994710

#SPJ4

The ratio of the equivalent lengths, which is 1/2 or 0.5 in decimal form, is hence the scale factor of the dilation.

The ratio of the matching lengths in the two figures is known as the scale factor. By dividing the length of the corresponding sides in the two figures, we can get the scale factor.

The original poster measures 18 inches by 36 inches, so the length ratio is:

36 / 18 = 2

This means that the length of the copy is 1/2 of the length of the original poster.

Similarly, the width ratio is:

9 / 18 = 0.5

This indicates that the copy's width is equal to half the size of the original poster.

The ratio of the equivalent lengths, which is 1/2, or 0.5 as a decimal, is the scale factor of the dilation as a result.

Learn more about scale factors here:

https://brainly.com/question/30215119

#SPJ1

Answer:

$50,328

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the amount after 18 years you find 2.4 percent of 27,000 which you then multiply by 2 (semiannually) and then multiply that number by 18. Once you get that you add it to the original 27,000.

119.07 feet fence would be required.

Perimeter is a measure of the distance around the boundary of a two-dimensional shape. It is the total length of all the sides or edges of a shape. For example, if you have a rectangle with a length of 5 units and a width of 3 units, the perimeter would be:

2(5 + 3) = 2(8) = 16 units

In this case, we added up the lengths of all four sides of the rectangle to get the perimeter.

Perimeter is typically measured in units of length, such as meters, feet, or centimeters, depending on the context of the problem. It is an important concept in geometry and is used to calculate the amount of material needed for things like fencing or paving.

Now to find the total length of the fence required, we need to find the perimeter of the garden. We can break the garden into two parts: the rectangle and the semicircle.

The rectangle has a length of 30 feet and a width of 23 feet, so its perimeter is:

2(30) + 23 = 83 feet

The semicircle has a diameter equal to the width of the rectangle (23 feet), so its radius is half of the diameter, or:

r = 23/2 = 11.5 feet

The circumference of the semicircle is half of the circumference of a full circle with the same radius, so it is:

(1/2) * 2 * 3.14 * 11.5 = 36.07 feet (rounded to two decimal places)

To find the total perimeter, we add the perimeter of the rectangle and the circumference of the semicircle:

83 + 36.07 = 119.07 feet

Therefore, the gardener needs 119.07 feet of fence to surround the rose garden.

To know more about perimeter visit-:

https://brainly.com/question/6465134

#SPJ1

The Maclaurin series for the function 6 sin nex a can be written using sigma notation as follows: 6 sigma from k=0 to infinity of (-1)^k (2k+1) x^(2k+1) / (2k+1)! where a is a constant.

This means that we can approximate the value of sin nex a for any value of x by using this series. The sigma notation allows us to write a general formula for each term in the series, which is then added up for all values of k from 0 to infinity.

In this case, we are multiplying alternating terms by powers of x and factorials, which will give us increasingly accurate approximations as we add more terms. Overall, the Maclaurin series is a useful tool for approximating functions and understanding their behavior.

To know more about Maclaurin series click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31383907#

#SPJ11

The following parts can be answered by the concept of Matrix.

a. The null space of matrix a is a line.

b. The null space of matrix b is a plane.

c. The null space of matrix c is a line.

To classify the null space of each matrix as either a line or a plane, we need to find the dimension of the null space for each matrix.

a = 1 2 3
   0 0 2
   0 0 1

To find the null space, we need to solve the equation Ax = 0, where A is the matrix and x is the vector of variables. This gives us the system of equations:

x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 = 0
2x3 = 0
x3 = 0

Solving this system, we get x1 = -2x2 and x3 = 0. So the null space is a line in R3 that can be parameterized as:

x = t × (-2, 1, 0)

Therefore, the null space of matrix a is a line.

b = 1 0 1 0
   0 1 0 1
   0 0 0 0

To find the null space, we need to solve the equation Ax = 0, where A is the matrix and x is the vector of variables. This gives us the system of equations:

x1 + x3 = 0
x2 + x4 = 0

Solving this system, we get x1 = -x3 and x2 = -x4. So the null space is a plane in R4 that can be parameterized as:

x = s × (-1, 0, 1, 0) + t × (0, -1, 0, 1)

Therefore, the null space of matrix b is a plane.

c = 0 -1 1
   0  0 1

To find the null space, we need to solve the equation Ax = 0, where A is the matrix and x is the vector of variables. This gives us the system of equations:

-x2 + x3 = 0
x3 = 0

Solving this system, we get x2 = x3 = 0. So the null space is a line in R3 that can be parameterized as:

x = t × (1, 0, 0)

Therefore, the null space of matrix c is a line.

To learn more about Matrix here:

brainly.com/question/28180105#

#SPJ11

If you had used a lower confidence level with the same set of students, the confidence interval would have been narrower. Lower confidence levels result in smaller intervals, as they require less certainty about the parameter being estimated.

If a lower confidence level had been used with the same set of students, the confidence interval would have been narrower. This is because a lower confidence level means that there is less certainty required, and therefore a smaller range of values that would be considered acceptable. However, it's important to note that using a lower confidence level also means that there is a higher chance of the interval not capturing the true population parameter, so it's important to consider the trade-off between precision and accuracy when choosing a confidence level.

Learn more about confidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/29048041

#SPJ11

We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the proportion of members who received their flu shot changed from the most recent year.

To answer this question, we need to perform a hypothesis test. Let's set up the null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis: The proportion of members who received their flu shot did not change from the most recent year, p = 0.48.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of members who received their flu shot changed from the most recent year, p ≠ 0.48.

We can use a significance level of α = 0.05, which means we want to be 95% confident in our conclusion.

Let's say the healthcare provider took a sample of 500 members and found that 260 of them received their flu shot.

We can calculate the test statistic as follows:

z = (P - p) / sqrt(p(1-p)/n)

where P is the sample proportion, p is the null hypothesis proportion, and n is the sample size.

Using the values given above, we get:

z = (0.52 - 0.48) / sqrt(0.48*0.52/500) = 2.29

This test statistic has a p-value of 0.022, which is less than our significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the proportion of members who received their flu shot changed from the most recent year. The healthcare provider's new advertising strategy appears to have had an impact.

To learn more about null hypothesis visit:  https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

According to the information provided, we have a figure with three points labeled X, O, X, the distance between the first X and O is 11 cm, and the distance between O and the second X is 5 cm looks like

The quadratic equation is x ax2+bx+c=0, which is a single-variable quadratic polynomial. a 0. Since this polynomial is quadratic, the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that it has at least one solution. Solutions can be simple or complex. A quadratic equation is a quadratic equation. This indicates that there is at least one word that needs to be squared. The expression "ax2 + bx + c = 0" is one of the commonly used solutions to quadratic equations. where are the numerical coefficients or constants a,b,c. where the variable 'X' is unknown.

According to the information provided, I have a shape with three points labeled X, O, and X, with 11cm spacing between primary X and O, and 5cm spacing between O and secondary X. there is. We are given the task of finding a solution for x, but this is not stated directly.

Knowing that x denotes the length of the segment labeled 'X', we can proceed as follows:

Consider the length of each of the three segments.

First X in O:

11 cm sec X to O:

5cm

First X to second X:

x cm (whatever you are looking for)

A point O acts as a connection from segment X to O from O to the second X, so the sum of their lengths must equal the length from segment X to the second X .

11cm+5cm=xcm

16 cm = ×

So the value of x is 16 cm.

In this case, measurements are displayed in centimeters, so there is no need to round to the nearest hundredth.

To know more about quadratic equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30098550

#SPJ1

The rate of change of the area of a rectangle with one of its sides given by a(s) = 10s² is 20s.

To find the rate of change of the area with respect to the side length, we need to differentiate the area function a(s) with respect to s.

The area function is given by a(s) = 10s². To differentiate, we apply the power rule: d(a(s))/ds = 2 * 10s²⁻¹ = 20s.

This means that the rate of change of the area with respect to the side length is 20s, which represents the rate at which the area is increasing or decreasing as the side length s changes.

To know more about power rule click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/23418174#

#SPJ11

Answer: 0.32% = 0.32/100 = 0.0032

Step-by-step explanation:

The series is convergent and its sum is -0.6.

The given series can be written as:

Σ n=1 |(0.5)^n-1-(0.2)^n|

Using the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series, we can write each term of the series as:

|(0.5)^n-1-(0.2)^n| = |(0.5)^(n-1) - (0.2)^n| = (0.5)^(n-1) - (0.2)^n

We can now write the series in a simpler form as:

Σ n=1 ((0.5)^(n-1) - (0.2)^n)

Next, we need to determine whether this series is convergent or divergent. To do this, we can use the ratio test. The ratio of consecutive terms is:

((0.5)^n-1 - (0.2)^n)/((0.5)^(n-1) - (0.2)^(n-1)) = (0.5 - (0.2)^n/(0.5))

As n approaches infinity, the second term in the numerator approaches zero and the ratio approaches 1/2. Since the ratio is less than 1, the series is convergent.

To find the sum of the series, we can use the formula for the sum of a geometric series:

a/(1-r)

where a is the first term and r is the common ratio. Here, a = 0.3 and r 0.5.

The sum of the series is thus:

0.3/(1-0.5) = 0.6

However, since the original series was expressed in absolute value, we need to take the negative of this sum to get the final answer:

-0.6

Therefore, the series is convergent and its sum is -0.6.

Learn more about convergent or divergent

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The probability that all three measurements of the voltage will lie between 116 and 118 is approximately 0.0025.

To solve this problem, we need to standardize the measurements of the voltage to obtain a standard normal distribution. We can do this by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the measured voltage, μ = 120 is the mean, σ = 2 is the standard deviation, and Z is a standard normal random variable. We want to find the probability that all three measurements will lie between 116 and 118, which can be written as:

P(116 < X < 118)³ = P((116 - 120)/2 < Z < (118 - 120)/2)³ = P(-2 < Z < -1)³

Using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard normal distribution, we can find that P(Z < -1) = 1 - P(Z < 1) = 1 - 0.841 = 0.159 and P(Z < -2) = 1 - P(Z < 2) = 1 - 0.977 = 0.023. Therefore, P(-2 < Z < -1) = P(Z < -1) - P(Z < -2) = 0.159 - 0.023 = 0.136. Finally, the probability that all three measurements will lie between 116 and 118 is:

P(-2 < Z < -1)³ = 0.136³ ≈ 0.0025

Therefore, the probability is approximately 0.0025.

To know more about probability, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780#
#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The initial amount to be invested by the first-year teacher in order to retire at 40 would be $12,763. Option 2.

The future value of an investment with continuous compounding is determined by the formula:

FV = Pe^(rt)

where:

FV = $150,000

r = 7.12% = 0.0712

t = 40 years

Substituting these values into the formula:

$150,000 = Pe^(0.0712*40)

e^(2.848) = P

P ≈ $12,763

Therefore, the teacher must initially invest approximately $12,763 to retire with at least $150,000 in the account.

More on future value of investments can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/20344604

#SPJ1

The point on the plane x - 2y + 3z = 6 that is closest to the point ( 0 , 1 , 1 ) is (3, 1, 0).

To find the point on the plane closest to (0, 1, 1), we need to find a point (x, y, z) on the plane x - 2y + 3z = 6 that minimizes the distance between (x, y, z) and (0, 1, 1). This is equivalent to minimizing the square of the distance between the points, which is given by:

Using the equation of the plane, we can write:

Substituting this into the equation for d², we get:

Taking the derivative of d² with respect to both x and y, and setting them equal to 0, we get a system of two equations:

2(x - 0) + 2((6 - x + 2y)/3 - 1)(-1/3) = 0

2(y - 1) + 2((6 - x + 2y)/3 - 1)(2/3) = 0

Simplifying these equations, we get:

x - 2y + 3z = 6

x + 4y = 18

Solving for x and y in terms of z, we get:

x = 18 - 4y

y = (18 - x)/4

Substituting these expressions into the equation of the plane, we get:

Substituting y = (18 - x)/4 into this expression, we get:

Thus, the point on the plane closest to (0, 1, 1) is given by:

x = 9

y = (18 - x)/4 = 3/2

z = 1 - x/9 = 2/3

So the point is (9, 3/2, 2/3).

Learn more about plane

https://brainly.com/question/28247880

#SPJ4

The average value of the function a(v) = 8v - 4v on the interval [1, 5] is 12.

To find the average value of a function on a given interval, we need to use the formula:

average value = (1/(b-a)) × integral from a to b of f(x)dx

In this case, the function is a(v) = 8v - 4v and the interval is [1, 5]. So we have:

average value = (1/(5-1)) × integral from 1 to 5 of (8v - 4v)dv

Simplifying the integral, we get:

average value = (1/4) × integral from 1 to 5 of 4vdv

Taking the integral, we get:

average value = (1/4) × [2v²] from 1 to 5

Plugging in the limits of integration, we get:

average value = (1/4) × [(2×5²) - (2×1²)]

Simplifying, we get:

average value = (1/4) × (50 - 2)

average value = (1/4) × 48

average value = 12

Therefore, the average value of the function a(v) = 8v - 4v on the interval [1, 5] is 12.

To learn more about average here:

brainly.com/question/24057012#

#SPJ11

To prove that if a is an integer and d is an integer greater than 1, then the quotient and remainder obtained when a is divided by d are [a/d] and a − d[a/d], respectively, we need to use the Division Algorithm.

The Division Algorithm states that for any two integers a and d with d>0, there exist unique integers q and r such that a = dq + r, where r is the remainder and 0 ≤ r < d.

Now, let's apply this algorithm to the given problem. We have:

a = dq + r

We want to express q and r in terms of a and d. To do this, we first divide both sides by d, giving:

a/d = q + r/d

Now, we take the floor function of both sides (i.e., the greatest integer less than or equal to a/d), giving:

[a/d] = q

Next, we multiply both sides by d and subtract from a, giving:

a - d[a/d] = a - dq = r

Therefore, the quotient and remainder obtained when a is divided by d are [a/d] and a − d[a/d], respectively. This proves the statement.

To learn more about integer click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29834917

#SPJ4

b) Making a Type I error in this context would mean rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

c) Making a Type II error in this context would mean failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false.

The null and alternative hypotheses for this situation can be stated as follows:

Null hypothesis: The mean of monthly cell phone bills is equal to $48.41.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean of monthly cell phone bills is different from $48.41.

Symbolically:

H0: μ = $48.41

Ha: μ ≠ $48.41

where μ represents the population mean of monthly cell phone bills.

b) Making a Type I error in this context would mean rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

In other words, it would mean concluding that the mean of monthly cell phone bills is different from $48.41 when it is not actually different. This is also known as a false positive, or a level of significance.

c) Making a Type II error in this context would mean failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false.

In other words, it would mean concluding that the mean of monthly cell phone bills is not different from $48.41 when it is actually different. This is also known as a false negative, or a beta error.

A type II error occurs when the sample size is too small or the hypothesis test is not powerful enough to detect a real difference.

Learn more about null hypothesis.

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Amy can make 9 half-pound servings of chicken with 4 1/2 pounds of chicken.

To determine the number of half-pound servings of chicken, Amy can make with  [tex]4 1/2[/tex] pounds of chicken, we need to divide the total weight of chicken by the weight of each serving.

Convert 4 1/2 pounds to an improper fraction:

[tex]4 1/2 = (4 \times 2 + 1) / 2 = 9/2[/tex]

Divide the total weight of chicken by the weight of each serving:

[tex]9/2 / 1/2 = 9/2 \times 2/1[/tex] (reciprocal of 1/2) = 9/1 = 9

Therefore,  Amy can make 9 half-pound servings of chicken with 4 1/2 pounds of chicken.

Learn more about fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/21449807

#SPJ1

Answer: Twice the product and three of a number.

Step-by-step explanation:

The total volume of the storage space is given by the last option:

s³ +  12 ft³

Remember that the volume of a cube of side length S, is:

V = S³

Here we have two cubes, so we need to find two volumes.

The first one has side length s, so its volume is:

V = s³

The second one has a volume of 12 ft³, the total volumeof the storage space is just the sum of the two volumes above, we will get.

s³ +  12 ft³

That is the correct option.

Learn more about volume at:

https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ1

The area of the surface is 180π.

The intersection of the paraboloid and the plane is given by x² + y² = 20. This is a circle of radius √(20) centered at the origin.

To find the surface area, we can use the formula:

A = ∫∫√(1 + [tex](fx)^2[/tex] + [tex](fy)^2)[/tex] [tex]dA[/tex]

where [tex]fx[/tex] and [tex]fy[/tex] are the partial derivatives of f([tex]x,y[/tex]) = x² + y² with respect to x and y, respectively, and [tex]dA[/tex] is the area element in the [tex]xy[/tex]-plane.

We have:

[tex]fx[/tex] = 2x

[tex]fy[/tex] = 2y

So,

1 + ([tex]fx[/tex])² + [tex](fy[/tex])² = 1 + 4x² + 4y² = 1 + 4(x² + y²) = 1 + 4(20) = 81

Thus, the surface area is:

A = ∫∫√(1 + ([tex]fx)[/tex]² + ([tex]fy[/tex])²) [tex]dA[/tex]

= ∫∫√81 [tex]dA[/tex]

= 9∫∫ [tex]dA[/tex]

= 9π(20)

= 180π

Therefore, the area of the surface cut from the paraboloid by the plane is 180π.

Learn more about paraboloid

brainly.com/question/30925041

#SPJ11

At the point (0,0), the partial derivative of g with respect to u is 5, and the partial derivative of g with respect to v is 3.

We are given that g(u, v) = f([tex]eu[/tex] + sin(v), [tex]eu[/tex] + cos(v)) and a table of values for f and its partial derivatives at two points. We need to find the partial derivatives of g with respect to u and v at the point (0, 0).

Using the chain rule, we have:

∂g/∂u = ∂f/∂x * ∂([tex]eu[/tex] + sin(v))/∂u + ∂f/∂y * ∂([tex]eu[/tex] + cos(v))/∂u

= [tex]e^u[/tex] * ∂f/∂x + [tex]e^u[/tex] * ∂f/∂y

∂g/∂v = ∂f/∂x * ∂([tex]eu[/tex] + sin(v))/∂v + ∂f/∂y * ∂([tex]eu[/tex] + cos(v))/∂v

= cos(v) * [tex]e^u[/tex] * ∂f/∂x - sin(v) * [tex]e^u[/tex] * ∂f/∂y

At the point (0, 0), we have [tex]e^u[/tex] = e^0 = 1 and sin(v) = sin(0) = 0, cos(v) = cos(0) = 1. Therefore, we can simplify the partial derivatives:

∂g/∂u (0,0) = ∂f/∂x (0,0) + ∂f/∂y (0,0) = 3 + 2 = 5

∂g/∂v (0,0) = ∂f/∂x (0,0) = 3

Therefore, (0,0) = 5 and [tex]gv[/tex](0,0) = 3.

Learn more about Partial derivatives

brainly.com/question/31397807

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is 7 socks.

Step-by-step explanation:

To ensure one matching pair, you need to pull out 4 socks. If none of the first three match, the fourth one will guarantee a matching pair.

You will then need to pull out 3 more socks, for a total of 7 socks, to ensure two matching pairs.

the sampling technique used is random stratified sampling

In the given scenario, the sampling technique used is random stratified sampling. The local polling center collects data by randomly interviewing 50 people from each of the age categories (18–25, 26–40, 41–64, and 65+), ensuring representation from all age groups. Stratified random sampling is a method of sampling that involves the division of a population into smaller subgroups known as strata. In stratified random sampling or stratification, the strata are formed based on members’ shared attributes or characteristics, such as income or educational attainment. Stratified random sampling has numerous applications and benefits, such as studying population demographics and life expectancy.

Stratified random sampling is also called proportional random sampling or quota random sampling.

Visit here to learn more about random stratified sampling:

brainly.com/question/29852583

#SPJ11

a) The percentage by which the amount the Lakeland Square Mall spends continues to increase, based on the function f(x)=12(1.12)^x, is 12%.

b) Given this function f(x)=12(1.12)^x, the amount being spent in 2011 is $23.70.

A function is a mathematical expression of the relationship between two or more variables.

Initial expenditure = $12

Growth rate of expenditure = 12%

The number of years between 2005 and 2011 = 6 years

f(x)=12(1.12)^x

= 12(1.12)^6

= $23.70

Thus, we can conclude that the initial expenditure of the Lakeland Square Mall of $12 in 2005 increased to $23.70 in 2011, based on the mathematical function.

Learn more about mathematical functions at https://brainly.com/question/11624077.

#SPJ1

The value of in the form y = f(x) by eliminating the parameter is y(t) = x - 2.

Identify the parameter that needs to be eliminated. Determine what type of parameter it is (independent, dependent, etc.). Determine how the parameter relates to the other variables in the equation.

Use algebraic manipulation techniques to eliminate the parameter. Check the final result to ensure that the parameter has been eliminated.

The expressions are x(t) = 3 + t² - 1 and y(t) = t².

We represent x(t) as x.

Now the expression is:

x = 3 + t² - 1

Simplify the expression

x = 2 + t²

Subtract 2 on both side, we get

t² = x - 2

Take square root on both side, we get

t = √x - 2

Now substitute the value of t in y(t) = t².

y(t) = (√x - 2)²

y(t) = x - 2

To learn more about eliminating the parameter link is here

brainly.com/question/15316914

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Express x(t) = 3 + t² - 1 and y(t) = t² in the form y=f(x) by eliminating the parameter. (express numbers in exact form. use symbolic notation and fractions where needed.)

Y =

The two other angles of rotation that take A to B are

If we wish to rotate point A on the unit circle by a negative 5π/4 radians, one method is to begin at point A and proceed clockwise with an angle of 5π/4 radians. Negative angles denote counterclockwise movement.

When attempting to find another rotation that transports A to B, we may augment -5π/4 radians by 2π (or multiples of 2π), yielding:

-5π/4 + 2π = 3π/4 radians

Alternatively, subtracting multiples of 2π from -5π/4 radians results in yet another rotation taking A to B:

-5π/4 - 2π = -13π/4 radians

Learn more about unit circle at

https://brainly.com/question/29268357

#SPJ1

We need to be cautious in interpreting this result since it is based on a sample and not the entire population.

If the confidence interval includes the reported rate of 31%, then the result is consistent with the reported rate. This means that we can be reasonably confident that the true proportion of defective candies in the population is around 31%, based on the sample data.

On the other hand, if the confidence interval does not include the reported rate of 31%, then the result is not consistent with the reported rate. This means that we cannot be confident that the true proportion of defective candies in the population is actually 31%, based on the sample data.

In the given question, the confidence interval for the proportion of defective candies does not include 31%, so the result is not consistent with the reported rate. This suggests that the true proportion of defective candies in the population may be different from 31%, based on the sample data. However, we need to be cautious in interpreting this result since it is based on a sample and not the entire population.

To learn more about population visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11