Note: Enter your answer and show all the steps that you use to solve this problem in the space provided.

Solve the system of equations algebraically. Show all of your steps.

y
=
x
2
+
2
x
y
=
3
x
+
20









please help!!! i've been stuck on this and i can't figure it out :(

a) The decrease of the computer component, which is decreasing at a rate of 13% per year, is an exponential decay.

b) If the component costs $120 today, and continue to decrease at 13% annually, it will cost $79.02 in three years.

Exponential decay shows that a value continues to decrease at a constant rate per annum.

Exponential decay or decrease is the opposite of exponential growth, which is the other type of exponential function.

Annual decreasing rate = 13%

Decreasing factor = 0.87 (1 - 0.13)

Cost of the component today = $120

Number of years, n = 3

Decreased value in three years = $79.02 ($120 x 0.87^3)

Learn more about exponential decay at https://brainly.com/question/12139640.

#SPJ1

The company would need to reduce the standard deviation in the process to approximately 1.197 millimeters to meet the target defect probability of 1%.

To calculate the required reduction in the standard deviation, we first need to find the new tolerance interval that corresponds to a defect probability of 1%. We can use Table 9.1 in the textbook to do this.

First, we need to calculate the process capability index Cpk, which is given by:

Cpk = min[(USL - μ)/(3σ), (μ - LSL)/(3σ)]

where USL is the upper specification limit, LSL is the lower specification limit, μ is the process mean, and σ is the process standard deviation. Substituting the given values, we get:

Cpk = min[(23.2 - 23)/(3 × 0.15), (23 - 22.8)/(3 × 0.15)] = min[0.6667, 0.2222] = 0.2222

Table 9.1 provides the tolerance factor k for a given Cpk and defect probability p. We want to find k for Cpk = 0.2222 and p = 0.01. From the table, we find that:

k = 3.090

The tolerance interval is given by:

μ ± kσ

where μ is the process mean and σ is the process standard deviation. Substituting the given values, we get:

23 ± 3.090σ

To reduce the defect probability to 1%, we want this interval to cover at least 99% of the process output. Therefore, we need to solve the following equation for σ:

P[(23 - 3.090σ) ≤ X ≤ (23 + 3.090σ)] = 0.99

where X is the process output. Using Table 8 in the textbook, we can find the z-score corresponding to a tail probability of 0.005, which is 2.58.

Substituting the given values and solving for σ, we get:

0.99 = P[(23 - 3.090σ) ≤ X ≤ (23 + 3.090σ)]

= P[-2.58 ≤ Z ≤ 2.58] (where Z is the standard normal variable)

= 0.995 - 0.005

= 2 × 0.495 - 1

Therefore, we have:

2.58 = (23 + 3.090σ - 23)/σ

= 3.090

Solving for σ, we get:

σ = 3.090/2.58 ≈ 1.197 millimeters

Therefore, the company would need to reduce the standard deviation in the process to approximately 1.197 millimeters to meet the target defect probability of 1%.

To learn more about probability visit:  https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

A yearlong study by volunteer in California reported the number of animals killed by motor vehicles, useful for estimating the impact of roads on wildlife.

The quantity of creatures killed by engine vehicles is a significant element to consider while surveying the effect of streets on natural life. In California, a yearlong report led by volunteers gave information on the quantity of creatures killed by engine vehicles.

This information can be utilized to appraise the immediate impact of streets on untamed life mortality because of crashes. Species distinguishing proof and area data can likewise give bits of knowledge into which species are generally impacted by vehicle crashes and where they are happening.

This data can be utilized to foster procedures to decrease the quantity of natural life vehicle crashes, for example, executing natural life intersections, cautioning signs, and diminishing velocity limits in high-risk regions.

To learn more about increase in the number of volunteers reported, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14138135

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

What was the number of animals killed by motor vehicles in the yearlong study conducted by volunteers in California? How can this data be used to assess the impact of roads on wildlife?

For a mass m=2, spring constant k=3, and damping constant c=1, the system is underdamped. To make it critically damped, c should be √(4mk) = √(4*2*3) = 4.


a) To find the general solution, we use the second-order differential equation: mx'' + cx' + kx = 0, where x'' is acceleration, x' is velocity, and x is displacement.

With given values, the equation becomes: 2x'' + 1x' + 3x = 0.

b) To determine the damping condition, we calculate the discriminant Δ: Δ = (c²) - 4mk = (1²) - 4(2)(3) = 1 - 24 = -23. Since Δ < 0, the system is underdamped.

c) To find c for a critically damped system, we use the equation: c = √(4mk). Plugging in m=2 and k=3, we get c = √(4*2*3) = 4.

To know more about damping constant click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/12975843#

#SPJ11

(a) To find the maximum torque on the loop of wire, we can use the formula:

τmax = NABsinθ

where N is the number of turns, A is the area of the loop, B is the magnetic field strength, and θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the plane of the loop.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

N = 150
A = (16.5 cm)^2 = 272.25 cm^2
B = 1.8 T
θ = 90° (since the maximum torque occurs when the loop is perpendicular to the field)

τmax = (150)(272.25 cm^2)(1.8 T)sin90°
τmax = 7338 N-cm or 0.7338 N-m (rounded to four significant figures)

Therefore, the maximum torque on the loop of wire is 0.7338 N-m.

(b) To find the torque when the angle between the field and the normal to the plane of the loop is 150°, we can again use the formula:

τ = NABsinθ

where θ is now 150°.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

N = 150
A = (16.5 cm)^2 = 272.25 cm^2
B = 1.8 T
θ = 150°

τ = (150)(272.25 cm^2)(1.8 T)sin150°
τ = -1999 N-cm or -0.1999 N-m (rounded to four significant figures)

Therefore, the magnitude of the torque in N-m when the angle between the field and the normal to the plane of the loop is 150° is 0.1999 N-m (since the negative sign just indicates the direction of the torque).
(a) To find the maximum torque on the loop of wire, we can use the formula:

τ_max = n * B * A * I * sin(θ)

where n is the number of turns (150), B is the magnetic field (1.8 T), A is the area of the loop, I is the current (46 A), and θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the plane of the loop.

Since the maximum torque occurs when sin(θ) = 1 (i.e., θ = 90°), we can calculate A by converting the side length to meters and squaring it:

A = (0.165 m)^2 = 0.027225 m^2

Now, we can calculate the maximum torque:

τ_max = 150 * 1.8 * 0.027225 * 46
τ_max ≈ 335.12 Nm

(b) To find the magnitude of the torque when the angle is 150°, we can use the same formula and plug in sin(150°):

τ = n * B * A * I * sin(150°)
τ = 150 * 1.8 * 0.027225 * 46 * sin(150°)
τ ≈ 167.56 Nm

Learn more about trigonometry here: brainly.com/question/29002217

#SPJ11

To obtain the sampling distribution (likelihood) and the posterior distribution for this scenario, we can use Bayesian inference.

The sampling distribution (likelihood) can be represented as:

p(y|u,02) = (1/sqrt(2*pi*02)^n) * exp(-(1/(2*02)) * sum((yi-u)^2))

where y is the observed data, u is the mean of the normal distribution, and 02 is the variance of the normal distribution.

The non-informative prior for 02 can be represented as:

p(02) « 1/02

Using Bayes' theorem, we can obtain the posterior distribution:

p(u,02|y) = p(y|u,02) * p(02) / p(y)

where p(y) is the marginal likelihood. To simplify the calculation, we can integrate out u from the joint distribution:

p(02|y) = (p(y|02) * p(02)) / p(y)

where p(y|02) is the marginal likelihood for 02:

p(y|02) = (1/sqrt(2*pi*02)^n) * exp(-(n-1)/2)

We can then obtain the posterior distribution for 02:

p(02|y) « 1/02 * exp(-(n-1)/2)

This is a gamma distribution with shape parameter (n-1)/2 and scale parameter 1/2. Therefore, the posterior distribution for 02 is:

02|y ~ Gamma((n-1)/2, 1/2)

Learn more about Bayesian inference here:

https://brainly.com/question/31448061

#SPJ11

Answer: Well, after 5 weeks, she will earn $150.

Step-by-step explanation:

30 x 5 = 150.

$30 per week, times 5 weeks.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the formal area is l.w.h.

2x-5=66

2x=66+5

2/2x=71/2

x=35.5

Answer:

the small pillows costed $20 and the large pillows costed $45

Step-by-step explanation:

this can be set up were x= price of small pillows and y=price of large pillows

according the the question, 265=2x+5y and 635=7x+11y

so now solve this system of equations:

first solve 265=2x+5y for x

add -2x to both sides

-2x+265=5y

add -265 to both sides

-2x=5y-265

divide both sides by -2

x=(-5/2)y+(265/2)

substitute this value of x in 635=7x+11y and solve for y

635=7((-5/2)y+(265/2)) +11y

y=45

substitute 45 for y in x=(-5/2)y+(265/2)and solve for x

x=20

so the small pillows are $20 and the large are $45

True. When y is a vector in Rn that is a linear combination of nonzero vectors u1, u2,..., up from an orthogonal set in Rn, the coefficients cj can indeed be computed without using systems of linear equations or row operations on a matrix.

You can compute the coefficients cj using the dot product and the fact that orthogonal vectors have a dot product of zero.

Step-by-step solution:

1. You have the orthogonal vectors u1, u2,..., up in Rn.

2. You also have the linear combination y = c1u1 + c2u2 + ... + cpup.

3. To find the coefficients cj, you can use the dot product of the vectors. For each j (1 ≤ j ≤ p), follow these steps:

a. Calculate the dot product of y and uj: (y • uj).

b. Calculate the dot product of uj with itself: (uj • uj).

c. Divide the result of step a by the result of step b: cj = (y • uj) / (uj • uj).

By using the properties of the dot product and orthogonal vectors, you can compute the coefficients cj without solving systems of linear equations or performing row operations on a matrix.

Know more about orthogonal set,

https://brainly.in/question/11439903

#SPJ11

The given trapezium has a perimeter of 8 units.

The total distance encircling the perimeter of a two-dimensional geometric object is known as the perimeter.

It is the total length of the shape's sides and edges.

Depending on the measurement system employed, the perimeter is typically measured in length units such as centimeters, meters, feet, or inches.

Since AB || CD, we have ∠ADC = ∠BCD = 180° - ∠DAB - ∠CBA = 60°.

Consider E be the point of intersection of AD and BC. Then, triangle ADE and triangle BCE are equilateral triangles, since all their angles are

60° and all their sides are equal in length to 2. Therefore, AE = DE = BE = CE = 2.

Now, consider triangle CDE. We can apply the Law of Cosines to find the length of CD:

CD² = CE² + DE² - 2(CE)(DE)cos(60°) = 4 + 4 - 4 = 4

So, CD = 2.

Since AB is parallel to CD, triangle ABE is similar to triangle CDE. Therefore, we can use the proportion of corresponding sides to find the

length of AB:

AB/CD = AE/CE

AB/2 = 2/2

AB = 2

Finally, the perimeter of the trapezoid is:

AB + BC + CD + AD = 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 8

To know more about trapezoid visit:

brainly.com/question/23657233

#SPJ1

Answer:

The increase is $90 - $80 = $10.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the percent of increase, we start by finding the amount of increase as a fraction or proportion of the original amount. In this case, the amount of increase is:

$10 / $80 = 0.125

To convert this to a percentage, we multiply by 100:

0.125 × 100 = 12.5%

Therefore, Peter's salary increase represents a 12.5% increase from last week's salary.

hope it helps:)

Using cosine rule, the angle A In the triangle is

The angle is solved using cosine rule by the formula

cos A = (b² + c² - a²) ÷ 2bc

substituting the values

cos A = (30² + 71² - 89²) ÷ 2 x 30 x 71

cos A = -33/71

Taking the cos inverse

A = arc cos (-33 / 71 )

A = 117.697 degrees

A = 118 degrees to the nearest degree

Learn more about cosine and sine rule at

https://brainly.com/question/29247917

#SPJ1

Therefore, the diver's depth from the surface on Monday can be expressed as -13.75/1 and it is a rational number.

On Monday, divers dive to a depth of -13.75 feet.

On Tuesday he dives four times as deep as he did on Monday. So here's how deep she dives on Tuesday.

4 x (-13.75) = -55 feet

To precise a diver's profundity as a rational number, we have to express it as a division where the numerator is the profundity over the surface and the denominator is the unit of degree (feet in this case). 

Therefore, the diver's depth from the surface on Monday can be expressed as -13.75/1.

On Tuesday, the diver's depth from the surface can be expressed as -55/1. So on Tuesday, divers dive to a depth of -55 feet, which can be expressed as the rational number -55/1. 

learn more about rational numbers

brainly.com/question/24398433

#SPJ4

The probability that the sample mean would differ from the true mean by less than $40 when a sample of 466 persons is randomly selected is approximately 0.9135 or 91.35%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for the standard error of the mean, which is:

Standard Error = Standard Deviation / Square Root of Sample Size

In this case, the standard error would be:

Standard Error = 505 / Square Root of 466
Standard Error = 23.374

Next, we can use the formula for the z-score, which is:

z = (Sample Mean - True Mean) / Standard Error

If we want to find the probability that the sample mean would differ from the true mean by less than 40 dollars, we need to find the area under the normal curve between z = -1.70 and z = 1.70 (since 40 / 23.374 = 1.70).

We can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find that this area is approximately 0.9106.

Therefore, the probability that the sample mean would differ from the true mean by less than 40 dollars if a sample of 466 persons is randomly selected is 0.9106, rounded to four decimal places.

We will use the Central Limit Theorem and the z-score formula.

Given the mean per capita income (µ) is $17,145 per annum, the standard deviation (σ) is $505 per annum, and the sample size (n) is 466. We want to find the probability that the sample mean differs from the true mean by less than $40.

First, we need to calculate the standard error (SE) of the sample mean, which is given by:

SE = σ / √n

SE = 505 / √466 ≈ 23.38

Now, we will find the z-scores for the range of $40 from the true mean:

Lower bound: (17,145 - 40 - 17,145) / 23.38 ≈ -1.71
Upper bound: (17,145 + 40 - 17,145) / 23.38 ≈ 1.71

Finally, we will find the probability by looking up the z-scores in a standard normal table or using a calculator:

P(-1.71 < Z < 1.71) ≈ 0.9135

Visit here to learn more about Probability:

brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer: The solution for w, expressed as a natural logarithm, is:

w = ln(88/3) / 5

Step-by-step explanation: Starting with the given equation:

-3e^(5w) = -88

Dividing both sides by -3:

e^(5w) = 88/3

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(e^(5w)) = ln(88/3)

Using the property that ln(e^x) = x:

5w = ln(88/3)

Finally, solving for w by dividing both sides by 5:

w = (1/5)ln(88/3)

So the solution for w, expressed as a natural logarithm, is:

w = ln(88/3) / 5

The measure of angle CQJ from the given circle is  118 degree.

Given that, measure of arc KJ is 124° and the measure of arc IC is 38°.

The central angle of an arc is the central angle subtended by the arc. The measure of an arc is the measure of its central angle.

Here, m∠kQJ=1/2 ×124°

m∠kQJ=62°

m∠kQJ+m∠CQJ=180°

62°+m∠CQJ=180°

m∠CQJ=180°-62°

m∠CQJ=118°

Therefore, the measure of angle CQJ from the given circle is  118 degree.

To learn more about the circle theorems visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19906313.

#SPJ1

The correct graph to display this data is

The bar graph with the title favorite sport and the x-axis labeled sport and the y-axis labeled the number of students, with the first bar labeled basketball going to a value of 17, the second bar labeled baseball going to a value of 12, the third bar labeled soccer going to a value of 27, and the fourth bar labeled tennis going to a value of 44.

The bar graph is used to display categorical data and the number of observations in each category. In this case, the categories are the different sports and the number of observations is the number of students who selected each sport as their favorite.

Here we have

A random sample of 100 middle schoolers was asked about their favorite sport. The following data was collected from the students.

Sports              Basketball    Baseball    Soccer    Tennis

No of Students       17                  12             27            44

A histogram is used to display continuous data and is not appropriate for this categorical data.

Additionally, the order of the bars in the first histogram is incorrect, which can lead to confusion when interpreting the data.

The correct graph to display this data is

The bar graph with the title favorite sport and the x-axis labeled sport and the y-axis labeled the number of students, with the first bar labeled basketball going to a value of 17, the second bar labeled baseball going to a value of 12, the third bar labeled soccer going to a value of 27, and the fourth bar labeled tennis going to a value of 44.

Learn more about Graphs at

https://brainly.com/question/13298277

#SPJ1

Answer:

2/4 = 1/2

1/2 of 12 is 6

6 + 4 is 10

You have 10 strawberries.

Step-by-step explanation:

for more detail since my answer above is just my head math:

Let's first find out how many strawberries your friend has:

Your friend has 12 strawberries.

Now, we need to determine how many strawberries you have based on the given information. We know that you have 4 more strawberries than 2/4 as many strawberries as your friend.

2/4 of your friend's strawberries is equal to:

2/4 x 12 strawberries = 6 strawberries.

Now, add 4 more strawberries to this quantity to find the total number of strawberries you have:

6 strawberries + 4 strawberries = 10 strawberries.

Therefore, you have 10 strawberries.

The margin of error of a confidence interval increases as:
c) the population standard deviation increases.



The margin of error (MOE) is influenced by three factors: the confidence level, the population standard deviation, and the sample size.

1. Confidence level: As the confidence level increases, the margin of error also increases because a higher confidence level requires a wider interval to ensure that the true population parameter is captured.
2. Standard deviation: As the population standard deviation increases, the margin of error also increases. A higher standard deviation indicates more variability in the population, leading to a wider confidence interval to account for this variability.
3. Sample size: As the sample size increases, the margin of error actually decreases because a larger sample provides more accurate estimates of the population parameter.

Therefore, among the given options, the margin of error of a confidence interval increases as the population standard deviation increases (option c).

Visit here to learn more about standard deviation:

brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Both problems lack sufficient data to complete the requested tasks. Additional elevation and distance information is required to draw potentiometric lines, flow direction arrows, and calculate the gradient.

To address Problem 3, we will follow these steps:  Draw potentiometric lines, Draw flow direction arrows, and Calculate the gradient.
Draw potentiometric lines
Potentiometric lines connect points of equal elevation on the water table. Since we only have one elevation value (1444'), we cannot draw potentiometric lines for this problem. More elevation data is needed.
Draw flow direction arrows
Flow direction arrows indicate the direction of groundwater flow, which is from high elevation to low elevation. Again, since we only have one elevation value, we cannot determine the flow direction. More elevation data is needed.
Calculate the gradient
The gradient is calculated as the difference in elevation divided by the horizontal distance between two points. Since we only have one elevation value and no information on the distance between the wells, we cannot calculate the gradient. More information is needed.
For Problem 4, we will also follow these steps: 1) Draw potentiometric lines, 2) Draw flow direction arrows, and 3) Calculate the gradient.
Draw potentiometric lines
Similar to Problem 3, we cannot draw potentiometric lines for Problem 4 since only one elevation value (1260') is provided. More elevation data is needed.
Draw flow direction arrows
As with Problem 3, we cannot determine the flow direction due to insufficient elevation data.
Calculate the gradient
Again, with only one elevation value and no information on the distance between the wells, we cannot calculate the gradient for Problem 4. More information is needed.
Unfortunately, both problems lack sufficient data to complete the requested tasks. Additional elevation and distance information is required to draw potentiometric lines, flow direction arrows, and calculate the gradient.

for more questions on gradient

https://brainly.com/question/25573309

#SPJ11

Answer:

  x ≥ 5

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the solution to the inequality √(3x+1) > √(x -5).

The square root function is increasing everywhere so the relation between the arguments is the same as the relation between their roots:

  3x +1 > x -5

  2x > -6 . . . . . . subtract x+1

  x > -3 . . . . . . . . divide by 2

However, the argument of the square root function must be non-negative, so we require ...

  3x +1 ≥ 0

  x ≥ -1/3

and

  x -5 ≥ 0

  x ≥ 5

The solution set that satisfies all of these inequalities is ...

  x ≥ 5

__

Additional comment

We can rewrite the inequality to ...

  √(3x +1) -√(x -5) > 0

The attached graph shows the graph of the left side of this inequality. It is undefined for x < 5, and it is > 0 everywhere it is defined, in agreement with the above.

Answer: 1. Since TL is a diameter, we know that mICR + m/RCL = 90°. Substituting the given values, we get:

(3x + 5)° + (x - 1)° = 90°

Simplifying the equation, we get:

4x + 4 = 90

Solving for x, we get:

x = 22

Therefore, x = 22.

2. Since TL is a diameter, we know that mICR = 90°. Substituting the value of x, we get:

mICR = (3x + 5)° = (3 × 22 + 5)° = 71°

Therefore, mICR = 71°.

3. Since TL is a diameter, we know that mILR = 180° - mICR - m/RCL. Substituting the values of x, we get:

mILR = 180° - (3x + 5)° - (x - 1)° = 180° - 4x - 4°

Substituting the value of x, we get:

mILR = 180° - (4 × 22 + 4)° = 52°

Therefore, mILR = 52°.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) To find the joint CDF, we integrate the joint PDF over the appropriate region: FXY(x,y) = ∫∫fXY(u,v)dudv = ∫₀ˣ ∫₀ʸ e^(-u²/2)v*e^(-v²)dudv.

(b) To find P[sqrt(x) > y], we first rewrite it as P[x > y²]. We can then use the joint CDF to find the probability: P[x > y²] = 1 - FXY(y²,y).

(c) To find the marginal PDFs, we integrate the joint PDF over the appropriate variable: fX(x) = ∫₀^∞fXY(x,y)dy = xe^(-x/2) and fY(y) = ∫₀^∞fXY(x,y)dx = ye^(-y²).

(d) X and Y are independent if and only if their joint PDF factors into the product of their marginal PDFs. However, we can see that fXY(x,y) does not factor into xe^(-x/2) and ye^(-y²), so X and Y are not independent.

In summary, we found the joint CDF, used it to find a probability, and then found the marginal PDFs. We also determined that X and Y are not independent since their joint PDF does not factor into the product of their marginal PDFs.

To know more about joint PDF click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31064509#

#SPJ11

1. The random process: Roll the dice 10 times: even = make; odd = miss

2. Repeat the above process many times, such as 10,000 trials.

Probability is a scale from 0 to 1, with 0 denoting impossibility and 1 denoting certainty, that expresses the likelihood of an event occurring.

It aids us in making predictions and decisions based on uncertain or random outcomes by representing the relative frequency of an event's occurrence in a set number of trials.

Assuming that the player is able to make 50% of his three-point shots, we can model each shot as a Bernoulli trial with probability of success p=0.5.

To simulate this scenario using a die, we can roll a fair six-sided die 10 times and consider even numbers as a successful shot (making the shot) and odd numbers as a failed shot (missing the shot).

We then repeat this process many times, such as 10,000 trials, and count the number of times the player misses 7 or more shots in the first 10 attempts. We can use this count to estimate the probability of this outcome.

Therefore, the correct options for each step of the simulation are:

3. Count the number of trials where the player misses 7 or more shots in the first 10 attempts, and divide by the total number of trials (10,000) to estimate the probability.

If the probability is low (say, less than 5%), then we can conclude that missing 7 or more shots in the first 10 attempts is a surprising result, given the player's claim of making 50% of his three-point shots.

To know more about random process visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15549243

#SPJ1

The answer is option A (.0146).

To find the probability of obtaining a z value between -2.4 and -2.0, we need to find the area under the standard normal distribution curve between these two values.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the area to the left of -2.0 is .0228 and the area to the left of -2.4 is .0082.

To find the area between -2.4 and -2.0, we subtract the smaller area from the larger area:

.0228 - .0082 = .0146

Therefore, the probability of obtaining a z value between -2.4 and -2.0 is .0146.
In a standard normal distribution, the probability of obtaining a z value between -2.4 and -2.0 can be found by looking at the area under the curve between these two points. To calculate this, you need to find the cumulative probability for each z value and then subtract them.

For a z value of -2.4, the cumulative probability is 0.0082.
For a z value of -2.0, the cumulative probability is 0.0228.

Now, subtract the two probabilities:
0.0228 - 0.0082 = 0.0146

So, the probability of obtaining a z value between -2.4 and -2.0 is 0.0146 (option a).

Learn more about normal distribution here: brainly.com/question/15603885

#SPJ11

The chi-square test allows us to determine whether the difference between the predicted and observed distributions of grades on the final exam is significant or not. This can help us understand the effectiveness of the teacher's prediction and identify any factors that may have influenced the actual distribution.

To answer this question, we can use the chi-square test, which measures the difference between observed and expected frequencies. In this case, the expected frequencies are based on the teacher's prediction, while the observed frequencies come from the actual distribution in Table 11.28.

The chi-square test involves calculating a test statistic, which measures the degree of difference between the observed and expected frequencies. This test statistic follows a chi-square distribution, which we can use to calculate a p-value. The p-value tells us the probability of getting a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the one we calculated, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

In this case, the null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the predicted and observed distributions. If the p-value is less than a chosen significance level (e.g., 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the difference is significant.

Know more about chi-square test here:

https://brainly.com/question/14082240

#SPJ11

Answer: There are 56 one-eighth of a pound servings in a bag of walnuts that weighs 7 pounds.

Once upon a time, a farmer harvested a bountiful crop of walnuts. He filled up a bag with all the walnuts he had collected. When he weighed the bag, it was 7 pounds. He wanted to divide the walnuts into equal portions to sell them at the local market. He decided to divide them into servings of one-eighth of a pound each. When he counted the total number of servings, he found that there were 56 of them in the entire bag. And that's the story of how the farmer found out there were 56 one-eighth of a pound servings in a 7-pound bag of walnuts.

Step-by-step explanation:

The 10%-90% rise time of the response is approximately 0.3 seconds, to the nearest third decimal place.

To determine the 10%-90% rise time of a response, we need to find the time it takes for the response to go from 10% of its steady-state value to 90% of its steady-state value.

Looking at the graph or response data provided, we can estimate that the steady-state value of the response is approximately 1.4.

10% of 1.4 is 0.14, and 90% of 1.4 is 1.26.

So we need to find the time it takes for the response to go from 0.14 to 1.26.

By examining the graph or data, we can see that this occurs between t = 0.9 seconds and t = 1.2 seconds.

The difference between these two times is:

1.2 - 0.9 = 0.3 seconds

Therefore, the 10%-90% rise time of the response is approximately 0.3 seconds, to the nearest third decimal place.

To learn more about decimal place visit:  https://brainly.com/question/50455

#SPJ11