The correct answer is C.
The U.S. and EU approaches to antitrust law have some significant differences. While both the U.S. and EU prohibit anticompetitive behavior, the U.S. tends to focus more on the impact that the behavior has on competition, whereas the EU tends to focus more on protecting consumers.
Additionally, the U.S. follows the rule of reason approach, which means that a particular practice or agreement is only illegal if it has a negative impact on competition. In contrast, the EU follows the per se approach, which means that certain types of conduct are considered to be inherently illegal, regardless of their impact on competition.
Finally, while the U.S. and EU both have laws that prohibit cartels and monopolies, the EU has stricter rules against market dominance by cartels, even if the cartels have not caused any harm to consumers.
To know more about, antitrust law click here:https://brainly.com/question/29304553
#SPJ11
In states, cities, and townships, traffic court are courts of limited?
Limited jurisdiction is a type of jurisdiction conferred on courts with legal authority restricted to specific subjects, cases or persons. Examples of limited jurisdiction courts include family courts, traffic courts, probate courts and military courts.
Jurisdiction. This means the official power to make legal decisions and judgments.
emergency crossovers on the interstate are legal in tennessee for:
Yes, emergency crossovers on the interstate are legal in Tennessee for emergency situations only.
Emergency crossovers are typically found in the median of divided highways and are intended for emergency vehicles to quickly and safely reach the opposite side of the highway. In Tennessee, emergency crossovers are legal for emergency situations only and are not to be used for turning around or avoiding traffic congestion. Drivers must only use emergency crossovers if their vehicle is disabled or there is a life-threatening emergency. It is important to note that emergency crossovers are not designed for regular use and using them in non-emergency situations can result in fines or legal consequences. It is important for drivers to always be aware of their surroundings and follow traffic laws to ensure the safety of themselves and others on the road.
To know more about the highways visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9332435
#SPJ11
some people have raised concerns about the current laws regulating the use of federal funds to pay for abortions because they___
Some people have raised concerns about the current laws regulating the use of federal funds to pay for abortions because they believe that it violates their moral or religious beliefs.
These individuals may have strong convictions against abortion and view the use of federal funds to support the procedure as a direct endorsement or support for a practice they consider morally wrong. They argue that taxpayer money should not be used to fund a procedure they believe infringes upon the sanctity of life.
Additionally, there may be concerns about the potential misuse or allocation of federal funds, questioning whether taxpayer dollars should be utilized for controversial medical procedures. These concerns reflect the ongoing debates and differing perspectives surrounding the sensitive issue of abortion and the use of public funds in relation to it.
To learn more about abortion, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/28147361
#SPJ4
john irwin described the lifestyle of an inmate who takes advantage of the positive experiences the prison has to offer as:
John Irwin described the lifestyle of an inmate who takes advantage of the positive experiences the prison has to offer as "the convict subculture."
The convict subculture is characterized by inmates who adapt to prison life by engaging in positive activities and experiences, such as participating in educational and vocational programs, developing social networks, and forming constructive relationships with prison staff.
These inmates choose to make the best of their situation and use their time in prison as an opportunity for personal growth and self-improvement.
By embracing the positive aspects of prison life, they can potentially increase their chances of successful reintegration into society upon release, as they have acquired new skills, knowledge, and a supportive network that can help them transition back into the community.
To know more about self-improvement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1657752#
#SPJ11
The defendant was an alcoholic who frequently experienced auditory hallucinations that commanded him to engage in bizarre and sometimes violent behavior.
The statement describes a defendant who is an alcoholic and frequently experiences auditory hallucinations that command him to engage in bizarre and sometimes violent behavior.
The presence of auditory hallucinations suggests the possibility of an underlying mental health condition, such as schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. The defendant's alcoholism may exacerbate or contribute to these hallucinations. In the legal context, the defendant's mental state and the influence of alcohol on his behavior may be considered during legal proceedings, potentially impacting the assessment of criminal responsibility and determining appropriate legal measures, such as the need for psychiatric evaluation, treatment, or mitigation in the sentencing process.
Learn more about violent behavior.
https://brainly.com/question/30542180
#SPJ4
whether or not there is an antideficiency act violation after application of the two-part corrections test, you must
Whether or not there is an antideficiency act violation after application of the two-part corrections test, you must notify appropriate officials of the violation and take corrective action to address the violation.
The Antideficiency Act is a federal law that prohibits federal agencies from obligating or expending funds in excess of amounts available in appropriations or in violation of other legal limitations. The two-part corrections test is a process used to determine whether an Antideficiency Act violation has occurred and whether the violation is significant enough to warrant disciplinary action. If a violation is found, the agency must notify appropriate officials, such as the Inspector General or the agency's Chief Financial Officer, and take corrective action to address the violation. Corrective action may include reimbursing the government for any improper payments, taking disciplinary action against responsible individuals, or implementing procedures to prevent future violations. It is important for agencies to comply with the Antideficiency Act and take appropriate corrective action to ensure the proper use of federal funds.
To learn more about federal law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ11
T/F a criminal intent or mens rea is typically required to establish criminal liability.
The given statement "a criminal intent or mens rea is typically required to establish criminal liability" is true because in most legal systems, establishing criminal liability generally requires proof of a criminal intent or mens rea.
Mens rea refers to the mental state or intention of the person committing a crime. It involves showing that the individual had a guilty mind or wrongful purpose when engaging in the prohibited conduct.
Criminal intent can take various forms, ranging from intentional actions with the specific intent to commit a crime to reckless behavior or negligence that demonstrates a disregard for the potential consequences of one's actions. Different levels of intent may be required for different types of crimes, with some offenses requiring a higher degree of intent than others.
The presence of criminal intent is often a crucial element in determining culpability and differentiating between criminal acts and accidents or unintended consequences.
It helps ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions and that criminal liability is based on both the actus reus (the wrongful act or conduct) and the mens rea (the mental state) associated with the offense.
To know more about mens rea refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30639117
#SPJ11
the original position is when people don't know their and this is done to ensure that .
The original position is a concept in political philosophy that was introduced by John Rawls. It is a hypothetical scenario where individuals are placed in a state of ignorance about their own characteristics such as their social status, wealth, talents, and preferences.
By placing individuals in the original position, they are forced to make decisions without knowing how it would affect them personally. In this way, individuals are compelled to think about the needs and interests of everyone in society, not just their own. They are also encouraged to think about what principles of justice would be most fair and just for everyone.
The original position is used as a thought experiment to explore different theories of justice. The two main principles of justice that emerge from the original position are the principles of equal basic rights and opportunities, and the difference principle. The former holds that all individuals have an equal claim to basic rights and liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and association. The latter principle allows for inequalities in society, as long as they benefit the least advantaged members of society.
To know more about Original position visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27961485
#SPJ11
The original position is a hypothetical scenario in John Rawls' political philosophy, where individuals are placed in a situation of impartiality and ignorance regarding their personal characteristics, such as their socioeconomic status, race, and religion.
Rawls uses the original position as a thought experiment to determine the principles of justice that would be chosen by rational individuals who lack knowledge of their own situation. This hypothetical scenario is essential to Rawls' theory of justice, as it allows individuals to consider the basic principles that would govern a just society from a position of fairness and impartiality. In this way, Rawls aims to create a framework for determining the principles of justice that are most conducive to creating a society that is fair and just for all individuals. The original position is done to ensure that individuals' own biases and personal interests do not unduly influence their decision-making in selecting the principles of justice that would govern society.
Learn more about socioeconomic status: https://brainly.com/question/29973247
#SPJ11
compare and contrast the public and private sector with regard to policymaking.
The main difference between the public and private sectors in policymaking is that the public sector involves government entities creating policies for the general population, while the private sector focuses on industry-specific policies and operates independently from the government.
In the public sector, policymaking involves the formulation and implementation of laws, regulations, and policies by government bodies at various levels, such as federal, state, or local governments.
These policies are aimed at addressing public issues, providing public services, and promoting the general welfare of society. Public sector policymaking involves a democratic process that includes public input, accountability, and adherence to legal and constitutional frameworks.
On the other hand, in the private sector, policymaking typically revolves around internal decision-making processes within organizations or businesses.
Private sector policies are primarily focused on achieving organizational goals, maximizing profits, and serving the interests of stakeholders. Private sector policymaking is influenced by market dynamics, competition, and the specific needs and objectives of the organization.
To know more about policymaking, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13035851
#SPJ11
