1. Guards: The guards experienced cognitive dissonance because they were asked to behave in a way that was inconsistent with their personal values.
Prisoners: The prisoners experienced cognitive dissonance because they were stripped of their personal identity and forced to live in a dehumanizing environment.
How to explain the information2. Guards: The guards coped with their dissonance by rationalizing their behavior.
Prisoners: The prisoners coped with their dissonance by developing coping mechanisms such as humor and self-deception.
3. Zimbardo used a number of techniques to help the prisoners and guards get “comfortable” in their roles. He dressed the guards in uniforms and gave them badges of authority.
4. The Fundamental Attribution Error is the tendency to attribute the behavior of others to their internal characteristics, while attributing our own behavior to external factors.
5. Asch’s research on conformity suggests that people are more likely to conform to the expectations of a group, even if those expectations are wrong. This can be seen in the Stanford Prison Experiment, where the guards conformed to the expectations of the authoritarian prison environment.
6. The Stanford Prison Experiment violated a number of current psychological ethical principles. First, it did not obtain informed consent from the participants.
7. Diffusion of responsibility is the tendency for people to feel less responsible for their actions when they are part of a group.
8. Milgram’s research on obedience suggests that people are more likely to obey authority figures, even if those authority figures are asking them to do something that they believe is wrong.
9. The research about in-group and out-group relationships can be applied to the Stanford Prison Study in a number of ways. First, the guards and prisoners quickly formed in-groups and out-groups. The guards saw themselves as the "good guys" and the prisoners as the "bad guys." This created a sense of us vs. them, which made it easier for the guards to mistreat the prisoners. Second, the guards and prisoners used stereotypes to make sense of each other.
10 Schemas contributed to the abuses that took place in the Stanford Prison Study and Abu Ghraib in a number of ways. First, schemas can lead to prejudice and discrimination. The guards and soldiers in these studies had schemas about prisoners and enemy combatants that led them to view these groups as less than human.
Learn more about dissonance on
https://brainly.com/question/29807266
#SPJ1
Write a message to Mr. Chang explaining why the groundwater heating system will warm the school more than the water heater system. Use evidence to support your claim. For each piece of evidence you use, explain how the evidence supports your claim.
Answer:
Dear Mr. Chang,
I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to explain why implementing a groundwater heating system would be more effective in warming the school compared to the traditional water heater system. I have gathered some evidence to support this claim:
Efficiency: Groundwater heating systems are known for their high efficiency in extracting heat from the ground. According to research conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy, these systems can achieve efficiency levels of 300-500% compared to the 90-98% efficiency of traditional water heaters. This means that for every unit of energy consumed, the groundwater heating system can provide three to five units of heat, resulting in a more effective heating process for the school.
Consistent Temperature: Groundwater temperatures remain relatively stable throughout the year, typically ranging from 50°F to 60°F (10°C to 15.5°C). By utilizing this consistent and relatively higher temperature, the groundwater heating system can provide a more stable and reliable heat source for the school compared to a water heater system that relies on external energy sources. This ensures a more consistent and comfortable indoor climate throughout the year.
Cost Savings: Implementing a groundwater heating system can lead to significant cost savings in the long run. The higher efficiency and lower operating costs of these systems can result in reduced energy consumption and lower utility bills for the school. Additionally, as groundwater heating systems have longer lifespans and require less maintenance compared to traditional water heaters, the overall maintenance and replacement costs are also reduced.
Based on this evidence, it is clear that a groundwater heating system would be more effective in warming the school compared to a water heater system. The higher efficiency, consistent temperature, and cost savings associated with groundwater heating systems make them a reliable and sustainable solution for providing efficient heating throughout the school.
I would be more than happy to discuss this further or provide any additional information you may require. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
[Your Name]
Explanation:
I'm about to take an Algebra One end-of-the-year test in about 30 mins,
I'm really stressed about it, does anybody have any tips or tricks for me?
Answer:
I would personally think that what you did before (like pre-studying) should count the most. Right now, just don't stress. Stress and anxiety affect memory because they make it harder for you to concentrate and lock new information and skills into memory. You may end up forgetting something simply because you were not really paying attention or had too much on your mind.
If you are allowed to use a calculator (which you probably should be able too), just make sure you know how to use it properly and all it's functions.
The best thing to do though, is too just flip through your previous notes or what I do is try and keep something that I'm not to good at or forget easily (related to the test) and just keep it in my mind. And then I would just get my test paper or working out page and write it down there. Although the best thing you could probably do is just revise formulas and sneak in maybe one or two practise questions if you can. That's pretty much the best thing for dealing with mathematics.