please help, i will give brainliest to the right answer

Answer:

It's the third one i hope this helps

Mark be brainest i said it first

Answer:

Normally punishments fit the crime more than the criminal. Countries have big long lists of minimum and maximum sentances for particular crimes. Within this there is a little leaway dependent upon the state of mind of the criminal, repeat offences and what their motivation was.

Answer:

I believe it is 0.08

Explanation:

There re different kinds of agreement. Because of breaking off the fire, the agreement gets void due to the fact that there was fire loss.

A void contract is known to be a kind of formal agreement that is effectively said to be illegitimate and cannot be enforced  from the time it is formed.

A contract may be said to be void if it is not enforceable as it was said to have been written. due to the fire loss, the agreement is no longer standing.

Learn more about agreements from

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

Coordination structure help organize and measure the capabilities of whole community by addressing the requirements of response mission areas, by enabling problem solving and by fostering coordination earlier to and subsequent to an incident.

Coordination structure is that structure which States held the main responsible for humanitarian reliefs in their border. Coordination structure is segregated on the jurisdictional basis. Such as, territorial coordination structure and tribal coordination structure.

By the term whole community, according to FEMA, means "A way for citizens, disaster response practitioners, organizational and community leaders, and public officials to cumulatively understand and consider the needs of their respective communities and figure out the best way to arrange and boost their assets, capabilities, and interests,"

Mission areas are those fields which serves as the end goal for the government within the disaster areas. There are 5 mission areas. Those are prevention, protection, mitigation, response and recovery of the disaster struck residents.

to know more about coordination structures here,

https://brainly.com/question/24792538

#SPJ2

Answer:

It's very important because without the people lending that power, the United States Constitution would not have been able to become the guideline for the Republican government we have today.

Explanation:

Answer:

the Southern states had tried to secede from the united states due to disagreements on slavery in the stated which then let to one of the biggest events which was the civil war.

Explanation:

Answer:

best answer ever

Explanation:

So, if I am Prime minister of ..... l,  I may do the following things, and again, just because a PM says or does something doesn’t mean it happens automatically, you have to deal with individual ministries and civil servants, media, the opposition party, judiciary, and others, It’s not a dictatorship where things get done just by speaking. Anyway, here are a few things.

Rule of law: Yes, that’s my priority to ensure that Constitution and laws are applied to everybody, rich and poor, politically connected, and others. This will be very difficult in the case of a coalition Govt but it can be done in a majority Govt with strong will and good ministers in various places. What can be done?? Well, we can first start by prosecuting previous cases of violation of rule of law by powerful politicians and others, media can help in that. Giving resources to public prosecutors and hiring good people so that accused are punished. Increasing punishment for things like corruption (It’s just 2 years in Nepal for big corruption) can also help. it must be assured that nobody is above the law and that way, their faith in Govt and democracy will be restored a bit.

Expedite construction projects: We have too many problems in Nepal with slow approval process or red tape regulation and also with procurement and contractors, among others which delays vital projects like building roads, airports, bridges, pipelines for water among others and even if they are built, it’s of less quality because a lot of money is being wasted on commission and there is corruption. I will create a task force of expert people from all relevant backgrounds to suggest ways to expedite construction projects including Hydropower projects, try to find out root problems and how to address them, see if the problems are politicians bureaucrats or private sector, and give me ways. A PM cannot know everything and we need to rely on experts for a solution. One of the biggest problems in Nepal is that politicians here including PM believe only they are real experts and don’t need help from anybody. We need to change that approach.

Electricity generation: This is a must for economic development in Nepal because without electricity there can be no industrialization. As everyone knows, Nepal has a huge potential in hydroelectricity which is renewable but big projects have been delayed for a long time. We need to expedite such big projects but also help the private sector build small hydropower projects in small communities to make them itself-sufficientient. Nepal’s total hydropower generation many says is around 80,000 MW (I am not sure, need to look at that as well) and many in Nepal say, we must build hydropower projects to then immediately sell to India. I think, first, we should make Nepal self-sufficient and then only think about other Countries. Electricity can be used not just for regular stuff but also for industries, we can give thousands of MW to industries in Nepal that will employ millions of good-paying jobs in Nepal, we can use electricity to make Nepal a leader in electric vehicles, and using renewables. We import billions of petroleum from India, if we can only try to reduce it by using electric vehicles, esp in Kathmandu, it will make a difference. Again, these are long-term projects and only a PM cannot do anything, huge amount of cooperation is needed on all sides, from Nepali people to the private sector. Nepal govt can always give incentives like custom-free electric vehicles that are cheap to tax credits for companies among others.

The rate of violent hate crime in 2005 was less than the rate of violent crime in 2019.

This comparison is not surprising because there had been a downward trend in violent hate crime but this began to rise in 2016 till it reached the rate of 1.0% in 2019.

With the election of Donald Trump, far right activists gained renewed momentum as they felt he was on their side. As a result, they increased their tendency to engage in violent hate crime.

Find out more on far right activists at https://brainly.com/question/511410.

Answer:

Write to your local U.S. Representative.

Explanation:

Answer:

The force Lebron James drives into the court when he jumps

i hope this helps

Answer:

JAIL- jails are intended for short sentences and temporary confinement

PRISONS- prisons are for felony sentencing longer than a year.

Explanation:

Explanation:

Jail and Prison are often used interchangeably, but they serve different purposes. The key difference: jails are intended for short sentences and temporary confinement while prisons are for felony sentencing longer than a year.

According to the divine command, they are not permitted to steal food for their family.

The idea that something is right because God has ordered it to be thus is known as the divine command theory. In other words, it implies that morally repugnant or immoral actions are wrong because God forbids them. This theory is absolutist.

According to the divine command doctrine, God has given humans the prohibition against stealing. Therefore, it is morally required of people to not steal.

Divine command theory provides a cause to be concerned that God's commands are arbitrary as general guidelines for moral behavior. They might or might not be kind, loving, or possess any other quality we regard as morally admirable, and they might even be harsh and cruel.

To learn more about divine command

https://brainly.com/question/24356569

#SPJ2

Explanation:

only claim crédits since the 3

Answer:

Minor in possession or minor in consumption of alcohol is a common criminal offense in Washington. According to RCW 66.44.270, it is unlawful for any person under the age of 21 to acquire, consume, or possess alcoholic beverages of any kind. Additionally, it is illegal for any person under the age of 21 to appear intoxicated in a public place or inside of a motor vehicle parked in a public place.

Explanation:

There are certain situations where these laws do not apply, including the following:

The minor’s parent or guardian provided him or her with the alcohol and he or she consumed the alcohol in the presence of the parent or guardian.

A parent, guardian, physician, or dentist provided the minor with the alcohol for medicinal purposes.

The minor possesses the alcohol for use in connection with religious services, such as communion, and he or she is consuming the minimal amount required for the religious service.

Answer:

The underage drinking laws help ensure that children (under 18 yrs of age) don't get injured or mentallly harmed. Alcohol is a serious topic, and even a small sip could cause diseases or injuries.

Answer:

Twisting: Misrepresenting by an insurance entity causing clients to drop the policy.

Explanation:

Defamation is incorrect because the slander/misrepresentation of a personal identity doesn't make the forfeit any policies.

Churning has nothing to do with this, as churning means a broker or agent breaks an agreement of sorts with the client.

Coercion is basically intimidation so that the victim doesn't speak out and acts a threat of violent force if the victim does speak out.

Answer:

the purpose of a will is so you can give you recent belongings and money to you family and friends.

Explanation:

Answer:

The patients.

Explanation:

Explanation/answer:

9th:

gives a ton of freedom to the people basically saying that they have the freedom to retain the rights even though they were not specifically discussed in the bill of rights, this limits the power of the government because it gives the people more power

10th:

Lets the states impose their own laws special to those states. having its own law would let the state become nearly as powerful as the federal government, so that takes away power from the federal government.

Honestly, it's good that the federal government doesn't have all the power otherwise it would be kinda like a dictatorship.

Answer:

Explanation:

Prejudice means: preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.

So without prejudice means: without any preconceived opinion that is not based.

Answer:

the legislative branch makes all laws, declares war, regulates interstate and foreign commerce and controls taxing and spending policies.

Answer: An act of piracy must meet very specific criteria to be considered an act of piracy according to the International Maritime Bureau.

Explanation: Among those criteria are: The pirates must board another vessel; The pirates must intend to steal or commit another crime.

This is not Plagiarized and can be directly copied and pasted to whatever assignment your working on.

Answer:

Explanation:

Pros:

Repair: Rather than simply dealing with crime in a clinical way, restorative justice acknowledges that it causes real harm to real people and real communities, helping everyone involved better understand a holistic view of the effects of crime.

Encounter: By bringing the victim and offender together in a safe way, the offender is given the chance to make amends rather than only deal with the legal consequences of their actions.

Transformation: The restorative process is designed to help bring about transformation in both parties. Some studies have indicated that restorative justice methods are more effective in improving victim-offender satisfaction, increasing the likelihood that the offender will comply with consequences or restitution, and decreasing the chance that offenders will reoffend in the future.

Cons:

In the case of a violent crime in which the victim and offender knew each other before the incident took place, the victim may want no further contact with the offender. In cases in which violence became a pattern, such as in a domestic abuse situation, attempts at preserving a toxic victim-offender relationship may be much more dangerous than potentially helpful.

Restorative justice also assumes that the offender is remorseful and willing to make amends, which may not always be true. In the case of in-person meetings, even if they’re monitored, there’s always the possibility that communications will deteriorate and cause the victim additional emotional or mental trauma.

On the other hand, even if the offender is remorseful, there’s no guarantee that the victim will be open to receiving an apology. Things may take a very different turn, and the victim or victims may interrogate the offender in a way that doesn’t turn out to be beneficial.

In instances of minor crimes, sometimes attempts at restorative justice may lead to a criminal receiving a lighter sentence or avoiding a criminal record altogether. Whether or not this is just can vary on a case-to-case basis.