Refer to the map below to answer the following question:

A map image of ancient China is shown. The region is divided into sections. The map shows the population change over a period of time in China. In the northeast, the population has decreased. In the northwest, the population has increased slightly or remained the same. In central and south China, the population has increased considerably. In the southeast, the population reached the highest level of increase.

In what part of China did the population decrease the most?

In the northeast
In the northwest
In the southeast
In the southwest

The settlement of the West had both positive and negative effects. One positive effect was that it led to the expansion of the United States and the development of new land. Settlers were able to establish new communities, farms, and mining towns. This led to economic growth and jobs for many Americans. Settlement also brought access to natural resources such as land, minerals, and water which allowed for the development of new industries. The West was also a source of fertile land for farming and the increase in agriculture led to the growth of the United States economy.

However, the negative effects of settling the West include the displacement and marginalization of Native American populations. Settlers and the U.S. government often dealt with Native American populations in a violent and unfair manner, leading to the loss of their land and culture. Settlers also brought with them diseases that Native Americans had no immunity to, which resulted in devastating losses of life. The destruction of the natural environment and wildlife in the West was another negative effect of settling. The overuse of land and resources through agriculture, mining, and other industries led to the degradation of the environment.

The arrival of railroads in the West also had both positive and negative effects. The railroad allowed for the efficient transport of goods and people across the country, which helped to grow the economy and connect people in new ways. However, the construction of the railroad had significant negative impacts on the physical environment. The construction of the railroad required the destruction of large areas of natural habitats, including the felling of forests for wood and the excavation of mountains for materials. Additionally, the railroad encouraged the spread of invasive species and disrupted local ecosystems.

In conclusion, while the settlement of the West brought many positive changes, the negative effects both on the environment and Native American communities cannot be ignored. The arrival of the railroad also helped to shape the West, but it also had negative effects on the natural environment. It is important to consider both the positive and negative effects of the Westward expansion in order to understand its impact on American history.

The settlement of the West had both positive and negative effects on the environment, economy, and indigenous peoples. On one hand, the expansion of the West facilitated trade and commerce, stimulated economic growth, and created opportunities for many people. The Homestead Act of 1862, which granted 160 acres of land to any individual who would settle and cultivate it for five years, encouraged many people to migrate to the West and start their own farms. This resulted in the growth of agriculture and ranching industries, and increased food production for the growing population of the United States.

However, the settlement of the West also had negative impacts on the environment and indigenous peoples. The introduction of agriculture and ranching led to overgrazing, soil depletion, and the depletion of water resources. The use of irrigation also led to the depletion of water resources and caused conflicts among settlers over water rights. The loss of land and resources negatively affected the livelihoods and cultures of many indigenous peoples, leading to displacement, marginalization, and even extermination.

The expansion of railroads was a key factor in the settlement of the West. While railroads facilitated the transportation of goods and people, they also had significant environmental impacts. The construction of railroads required the excavation of mountains and the clearing of forests, which disrupted ecosystems and caused soil erosion. The use of coal to power locomotives also led to air pollution and contributed to climate change.

In conclusion, the settlement of the West had both positive and negative effects on the environment, economy, and indigenous peoples. While it stimulated economic growth and created opportunities for many people, it also caused significant environmental damage and had negative impacts on indigenous peoples. The effects of railroads on the physical environment were also significant, with the construction and operation of railroads contributing to soil erosion, air pollution, and climate change.

Answer:

D) There is often much criticism.

What is America's Foreign Policy?

The officially stated goals of the foreign policy of the United States of America, including all the bureaus and offices in the United States Department of State, as mentioned in the Foreign Policy Agenda of the Department of State, are "to build and sustain a more democratic, secure, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community". The United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs states as some of its jurisdictional goals: "export controls, including nonproliferation of nuclear technology and nuclear hardware; measures to foster commercial interaction with foreign nations and to safeguard American business abroad; international commodity agreements; international education; protection of American citizens abroad; and expulsion". U.S. foreign policy and foreign aid have been the subject of much debate, praise, and criticism, both domestically and abroad.

United States foreign policy has been the subject of debate, receiving praise and criticism domestically and abroad.

In early 2017, the U.S. faced criticism from some scholars, activists and media outlets for dropping 26,171 bombs on seven countries throughout 2016: Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.

The U.S. has faced criticism for backing right-wing dictators that systematically violated human rights, such as Augusto Pinochet of Chile, Alfredo Stroessner of Paraguay, Efraín Ríos Montt of Guatemala, Jorge Rafael Videla of Argentina, Hissène Habré of Chad.

D there is often much criticism

“Congress write laws nominating judges; the president confirms judicial nominations.”

Congress establishes federal courts and the president nominates judges. Hence, the correct answer is option A.

What is the Congress?

The United States Congress is the bicameral legislative branch of the federal government of the United States. It consists of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The main responsibilities of Congress include passing laws, levying taxes, and overseeing the work of the executive branch of the government.

According to the US Constitution, Congress has the power to create lower federal courts, while the president is responsible for nominating judges to fill vacancies in the federal courts, subject to confirmation by the Senate.

Therefore, Congress establishes federal courts and the president nominates judges. Hence, the correct answer is option A.

Learn more about Congress, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2063003

#SPJ2

 

Answer: to make laws

Explanation:

legislative is the only branch that can create laws. executive could either be used to veto or carry out, and judicial could either be used for veto and interpret. I hope this helps!! :D

yes theyre correct, they carry out laws

Answer:

True is the correct answer.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

because there were few schools at that time

In response to the economic, social, and political challenges of the 1920s and 1930s, nations around the world adopted a range of measures to address the issues. Many countries, including the United States, implemented protectionist policies such as tariffs and quotas to protect their own industries against foreign competition. Other nations, such as Germany, adopted interventionist economic policies to try to combat high unemployment rates. On the social front, nations such as the United States began to introduce social welfare programs such as Social Security to provide assistance to those in need. Governments also took steps to address political issues, such as introducing new forms of democratic governance and attempting to restore international peace and stability.

Many nations implemented government intervention and policies to stimulate their economies. Some countries, like Germany, faced hyperinflation and economic instability. In response, they adopted policies such as currency reforms and austerity measures to stabilize the economies.

In many nations, the economic hardships of the time led to social unrest and protests. For example, the Great Depression sparked the bonus Army protests in the United States, where World War I veterans demanded their bonuses early. The ride in totalitarian regimes in countries like Germany and Italy offered social stability but at the expense of individual freedoms. These regimes used propaganda, censorship, and repression to control society.

The economic challenges of the 1920s and 1930s also had political implications. In some countries, such as the Weimar Republic in Germany, the economic crisis led to political instability and the rise of extremist ideologies. In response to the global economic downturn, nations began adopting protectionist trade policies, such as high tariffs, safeguard, domestic industries. The approach aimed to protect jobs and promote self sufficiency but also contributed to a decline in the international trade.

The reactions of nations to the economic, social, and political challenges of the 1920s and 1930s varied depending on the specific circumstances and ideologies of each country.

It’s C because I’m doing this stuff right now on tx history.

C, two-thirds of each house of congress vote to propose.

Answer:

In the 1830s, supporters of states’ rights believed that states had the right to nullify federal laws. Therefore, the correct answer is (D) States had the right to nullify federal laws.

This belief was based on the idea that the federal government was a creation of the states and that the states had the ultimate authority to decide whether or not to obey federal laws. This concept was particularly relevant in the debate over tariffs during this period, as many southern states believed that they were being unfairly taxed by the federal government and should have the right to nullify these taxes if they saw fit.

This belief in states’ rights was a major issue leading up to the Civil War, as many southern states argued that they had the right to secede from the Union based on their interpretation of states’ rights and nullification. Ultimately, the issue was resolved through the outcome of the war and the subsequent Reconstruction amendments to the Constitution, which clarified the relationship between the federal government and the states.

Answer: a i think

Explanation: