Rocío compró un televisor de plasma que costaba 8999. 00 pero tenía un descuento de un 30% cuánto pagó finalmente por él

The probability that Mr. Chiu's class will take the quiz is b).1/4.

To determine the probability that Mr. Chiu's class will take the quiz, we need to calculate the probability of getting either all heads or all tails when flipping a coin three times.

When flipping a fair coin, the probability of getting either heads (H) or tails (T) on a single flip is 1/2.

Let's consider the two cases separately:

Case 1: All three results are heads (HHH):

The probability of getting heads on a single flip is 1/2. Since each flip is independent, the probability of getting three heads in a row is (1/2) * (1/2) * (1/2) = 1/8.

Case 2: All three results are tails (TTT):

Similar to Case 1, the probability of getting tails on a single flip is also 1/2. So, the probability of getting three tails in a row is (1/2) * (1/2) * (1/2) = 1/8.

Since we are interested in either of these two cases happening for the class to take the quiz, we can add their probabilities together:

P(Class takes the quiz) = P(All three results are heads) + P(All three results are tails)

                         = 1/8 + 1/8

                         = 1/4

Therefore, the probability that Mr. Chiu's class will take the quiz is 1/4.

The correct answer is (b) 1/4.

To know more about "Probability"  refer here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ4

b. We are 95% confident that the proportion of coworkers who have received this year's flu vaccine is between 43.9% and 58.1%

It is only (b) option is TRUE.

From the question, we have the information available is:

From a survey of coworkers you find that 51% of 200 have already received this year's flu vaccine.

An approximate 95% confidence interval is (0.439,0.581).

We have to find the which statement is true.

Now, According to the question:

a. 95% of the coworkers fall in the interval (0.439,0.581).

It is false statement because This interval is about the worker's flu vaccine proportion.

b. We are 95% confident that the proportion of coworkers who have received this year's flu vaccine is between 43.9% and 58.1%

This is true statement.

c. There is a 95% chance that a randomly selected coworker has received the vaccine

It is False. A random selected coworker has received the vaccine proportion is between 43.9% and 58.1%

d. There is a 51% chance that a randomly selected coworker has received the vaccine

It is False. This chance is between 43.9% and 58.1% in 95% confidence level.

e. We are 95% confident that between 43.9% and 58.1% of the samples will have a proportion near 51%.

It is also false . because there is no meaning of this sentence.

Learn more about Confidence interval at:

https://brainly.com/question/13067956

#SPJ4

In a circle, 5 ones and 4 zeros are arranged randomly. Between any two equal digits, you write 0, and between any two different digits, you write 1.

To understand the process, consider the arrangement of the digits around the circle. Let's start with the first digit and compare it with the next digit. If they are the same, we write 0 in between them. If they are different, we write 1.

We continue this process for all adjacent pairs of digits around the circle until we reach the starting point again. This creates a new arrangement of zeros and ones based on the original arrangement of the digits.

By following this rule, we ensure that between any two equal digits, we have a 0, and between any two different digits, we have a 1. The resulting arrangement reflects the pattern described in the problem statement.

To learn more about arrange order click here: brainly.com/question/32479272

#SPJ11

The angle of elevation from Kim to the fireworks is approximately 5.71 degrees.

To find the angle of elevation from Kim to the fireworks, we can use trigonometry. Let's consider a right triangle formed by Kim, the fireworks, and the ground.

In the triangle, the horizontal distance between Kim and the fireworks is 5 miles, and the vertical distance (height) from the ground to the fireworks is 0.5 miles. We can use the tangent function to find the angle of elevation.

The tangent of an angle is defined as the ratio of the opposite side to the adjacent side. In this case, the opposite side is the height (0.5 miles) and the adjacent side is the horizontal distance (5 miles). So, we have:

tan(angle) = opposite/adjacent

tan(angle) = 0.5/5

To find the angle, we can take the inverse tangent (arctan) of both sides:

angle = arctan(0.5/5)

Using a calculator or trigonometric tables, we find:

angle ≈ 5.710593137 degrees

Therefore, the angle of elevation from Kim to the fireworks is approximately 5.71 degrees.

For such more questions on Elevation Angle

https://brainly.com/question/27243378

#SPJ11

Money Daiana contributes is $225, Guille contributes is $275, and Fede contributes is $110.

Let's solve this problem step by step:

Let's assume Daiana has x dollars.

Guille has $50 more than Daiana, so Guille has (x + $50) dollars.

Fede has a fifth of Guille and Daiana's money together, which is (1/5)(x + $50 + x) = (1/5)(2x + $50) dollars.

According to the given information, the total amount of money they have is $600. So we can set up the equation:

x + (x + $50) + (1/5)(2x + $50) = $600

Now let's solve this equation:

2x + $50 + (2/5)x + $10 = $600

(12/5)x + $60 = $600

12x + $300 = $3000

12x = $2700

x = $225

Now that we have found the value of x, we can determine the amount of money each friend contributes:

Daiana: $225

Guille: $225 + $50 = $275

Fede: (1/5)(2 * $225 + $50) = $110

To learn more about Money here:

https://brainly.com/question/29299365

#SPJ4

Based on the provided data, there is evidence to suggest that seniors at Littlewood Regional High School cut classes significantly more than the student body as a whole.

To determine if seniors at Littlewood Regional High School are significantly different from the student body as a whole in terms of cutting classes, we can perform a hypothesis test.

Let's define our hypotheses:

Null Hypothesis (H₀): The average number of cuts per month for seniors is equal to the average number of cuts per month for the student body as a whole.

μ = 3.3

Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): The average number of cuts per month for seniors is not equal to the average number of cuts per month for the student body as a whole.

μ ≠ 3.3

Next, we can calculate the test statistic, which in this case is the z-score. The formula for the z-score is:

z = (x - μ) / (σ / √(n))

Where:

x = sample mean

μ = population mean (given as 3.3)

σ = population standard deviation (given as 0.53)

n = sample size (given as 117)

Plugging in the values:

x = 3.8

μ = 3.3

σ = 0.53

n = 117

z = (3.8 - 3.3) / (0.53 / √(117))

z = 0.5 / (0.53 / 10.82)

z ≈ 5.161

We can compare this z-score to the critical values at the desired significance level.

Since the research question suggests a two-tailed test, we need to split the alpha level between the upper and lower tails of the sampling distribution.

Let's assume a significance level of α = 0.05 (5%).

Looking up the critical value for α/2 = 0.025 in the z-table, we find it to be approximately ±1.96.

Since our calculated z-score (5.161) is greater than 1.96, we can reject the null hypothesis.

This indicates that the seniors' average number of cuts per month is significantly different from the student body as a whole.

Therefore, based on the provided data, there is evidence to suggest that seniors at Littlewood Regional High School cut classes significantly more than the student body as a whole.

Learn more about hypothesis test click;

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

OA. 4.81 and 4.89.According to the central limit theorem, approximately 99.7% of the sample means will fall within three standard deviations of the population mean.

Since the standard deviation of the population is 0.92, three standard deviations would be 0.92 * 3 = 2.76. Therefore, the interval would be from the population mean minus 2.76 to the population mean plus 2.76: 4.85 - 2.76 = 4.81 and 4.85 + 2.76 = 4.89. The central limit theorem states that when a random sample is drawn from a population with any distribution, the distribution of the sample means will approach a normal distribution as the sample size increases. This allows us to make inferences about the population based on the sample means. In this case, the national apple growers organization collected data on the weight of the new apple variety. The population mean is given as 4.85 ounces and the standard deviation is 0.92. The sample size is 500 apples.According to the central limit theorem, approximately 99.7% of the sample means will fall within three standard deviations of the population mean. Since the standard deviation of the population is 0.92, three standard deviations would be 0.92 * 3 = 2.76.To find the interval, we subtract and add 2.76 to the population mean:Lower limit = 4.85 - 2.76 = 4.81 Upper limit = 4.85 + 2.76 = 4.89

learn more about theorem here :

https://brainly.com/question/30066983

#SPJ11

The conditional statement to determine if the 10 cents off promotion applies at the local gas station would be "If today is Wednesday, then the price of gas is reduced by 10 cents."

This statement establishes a condition (today being Wednesday) and states the resulting action (a 10 cent reduction in gas price). By using the "if-then" structure, the statement indicates that the promotion is contingent upon the specific day of the week. If it is not Wednesday, the promotion does not apply, and the price of gas remains unchanged. This conditional statement allows customers to easily determine if they can take advantage of the 10 cents off promotion when planning their visit to the gas station.

To know more about promotion:

https://brainly.com/question/30581937

#SPJ4

In order to fill the ice cream cone of the above mentioned dimensions of ice cream cone in the question  5 ice cream scoops are required.

The number of ice cream scoops that are needed to fill an ice cream cone with radius 2 inches and height 5 inches given that the ice cream scoop scoops out ice cream spheres with radius 1 inch can be calculated as follows: Volume of an ice cream cone is given by: V = (1/3)πr²hwhere r = radius and h = height of the cone, Radius of the ice cream cone, r = 2 inches, Height of the ice cream cone, h = 5 inches. Volume of the ice cream cone, V = (1/3)πr²h= (1/3) x (22/7) x 2² x 5= 20.95 cubic inches. The volume of a sphere is given by: V = (4/3)πr³where r = radius of the sphere.Radius of the ice cream sphere, r = 1 inch. Volume of the ice cream sphere, V = (4/3)πr³= (4/3) x (22/7) x 1³= 4.19 cubic inches.

Therefore, the number of ice cream scoops needed to fill the ice cream cone is given by: Number of scoops = Volume of the ice cream cone/Volume of the ice cream scoop= 20.95/4.19= 5 scoops. Hence, 5 ice cream scoops are required to fill the ice cream cone with radius 2 inches and height 5 inches.

Let's learn more about sphere :

https://brainly.com/question/30439723

#SPJ11

log⁡(x^5zy/y) = 5 * log⁡(x) + log⁡(z). The given logarithm expression is log⁡(x^5zy/y). To expand this logarithm fully using the properties of logs, we can apply the following rules:

1. Power Rule: log⁡(a^b) = b * log⁡(a)

2. Quotient Rule: log⁡(a/b) = log⁡(a) - log⁡(b)

Applying these rules to the given expression, we can expand it as follows:

log⁡(x^5zy/y) = log⁡(x^5zy) - log⁡(y)

Now, using the power rule, we can simplify the first term:

log⁡(x^5zy) = 5 * log⁡(x) + log⁡(z) + log⁡(y)

Substituting this back into the expanded expression, we have:

log⁡(x^5zy/y) = (5 * log⁡(x) + log⁡(z) + log⁡(y)) - log⁡(y)

Simplifying further, we obtain:

log⁡(x^5zy/y) = 5 * log⁡(x) + log⁡(z)

Learn more about logarithm here: brainly.com/question/30226560

#SPJ11

Expand the logarithm fully using the properties of logs Express the final answer in terms of log x; logy; and log log y' Vz

Given statement solution is :- The new cost of a table is:

New cost of a table = T + (T * 20%)

New cost of a table = T + (T * 0.2)

New cost of a table = 1.2T

The new cost of a chair is:

A new chair would cost $900 plus ($900 * 20%)

A chair would cost $900 new plus ($900 * 0.2)

A new chair would cost $900 plus $180.

New cost of a chair = $1,080

Let's assume that a chair originally cost C and a table originally cost T.

The price of two chairs, based on the information provided, is $1,800. So we can set up the following equation:

2C = $1,800

When we multiply the two sides of the equation by 2, we get:

C = $1,800 / 2

C = $900

This indicates that a chair once cost $900.

After a month, the price of every chair and every table has now gone up by 20%. This means the new cost of a chair is 120% of the original cost, and the new cost of a table is also 120% of the original cost.

The new cost of a chair is:

A new chair would cost $900 plus ($900 * 20%)

A chair would cost $900 new plus ($900 * 0.2)

A new chair would cost $900 plus $180.

New cost of a chair = $1,080

Similarly, the new cost of a table is:

New cost of a table = T + (T * 20%)

New cost of a table = T + (T * 0.2)

New cost of a table = 1.2T

According to the given information, the office bought 6 chairs and 2 tables at $4,800. Using the updated costs, we can construct the following equation:

(6 * $1,080) + (2 * 1.2T) = $4,800

Simplifying the equation, we have:

6,480 + 2.4T = 4,800

Subtracting 2.4T from both sides, we get:

6,480 = 4,800 - 2.4T

Subtracting 4,800 from both sides, we have:

1,680 = -2.4T

Dividing both sides by -2.4, we find:

T = 1,680 / -2.4

T ≈ -$700

For such more questions on New Cost Calculation

https://brainly.com/question/2513267

#SPJ8

A) The value of p(x=5) is 0.2017

B) The value of p(x=8) is 0.1167

C) The expected value (mean) of x7.89.

A) We are required to find P(x = 5).P(x = 5) is the probability that 5 out of the 10 students selected chose the stated option.

Using the binomial distribution formula, we have

P(x = 5) = nCx px q(n - x)

where n = 10, x = 5, p = 45/57 = 0.789, and q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.789 = 0.211

Thus, P(x = 5) = (10C5) (0.789)5 (0.211)5= 0.2017 (rounded to four decimal places)

B) We are required to find P(x = 8).P(x = 8) is the probability that 8 out of the 10 students selected chose the stated option.

Using the binomial distribution formula, we have

P(x = 8) = nCx px q(n - x)

where n = 10, x = 8, p = 45/57 = 0.789, and q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.789 = 0.211

Thus, P(x = 8) = (10C8) (0.789)8 (0.211)2= 0.1167 (rounded to four decimal places)

C) We are required to find the expected value (mean) of x.

Using the binomial distribution formula, we have

E(x) = np

where n = 10, and p = 45/57 = 0.789

Thus, E(x) = 10 × 0.789= 7.89 (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the expected value (mean) of x is 7.89.

Learn more about probability at:

https://brainly.com/question/32637936

#SPJ11

This experiment would most likely employ a within-subjects design.

In a within-subjects design, participants are exposed to different conditions or treatments, and their responses are measured.

In this case, the experiment involves studying the mean difference in autonomy between first-born and second-born children within the same families.

By taking a random sample of families and sorting the children into first- and second-born, the experiment is comparing the autonomy of children within each family, rather than comparing different families.

Each family acts as its own control, and the differences in autonomy between the first-born and second-born children within each family are examined.

This design allows researchers to control for potential confounding variables that might exist at the family level (e.g., family background, parenting style) and focus specifically on the differences in autonomy between the first-born and second-born children within the same family.

It reduces the influence of family-level factors and provides a more direct comparison of siblings.

Therefore, a within-subjects design would be most suitable for studying the mean difference in autonomy between first-born and second-born children in this scenario.

To know more about within-subjects design refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30753977#

#SPJ11

The deciles in a normal distribution lie approximately 1.28 standard deviations on either side of the mean.

In a normal distribution, the standard deviation is a measure of the spread or variability of the data. The empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule, states that approximately 68% of the observations fall within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% fall within two standard deviations, and 99.7% fall within three standard deviations.

Since the deciles mark off the highest and lowest 10% of the observations, they are located at points beyond one standard deviation. The deciles divide the distribution into ten equal parts, with each decile representing a specific percentage of the data.

To determine the distance of the deciles from the mean, we can use the fact that 10% of the data lies beyond one standard deviation. By dividing 10% by 2, we get 5%. Looking up the Z-score associated with 5% in a standard normal distribution table or using statistical software, we find it to be approximately 1.28.

Therefore, the deciles in a normal distribution lie approximately 1.28 standard deviations on either side of the mean.

Learn more about Distribution

brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

The sum of all the conditional probabilities of X given that value of Y must also equal 1. This can be written as Σ P(X | Y = y) = 1.

If X and Y are random variables, the sum of all the conditional probabilities of X given a specific value of Y will always be 1. This is because conditional probabilities are defined as the probability of an event occurring given that another event has already occurred. In this case, the other event is a specific value of Y. Since the probability of all possible outcomes of X given a specific value of Y must add up to 1, the sum of all the conditional probabilities of X given that value of Y must also equal 1.

Conditional probability is defined as the probability of an event occurring given that another event has already occurred. For example, the probability of getting a head on a coin flip given that the coin is fair is 0.5. This is written as P(H | F) = 0.5, where H is the event of getting a head and F is the event of the coin being fair. In the case of random variables X and Y, the conditional probability of X given a specific value of Y is written as P(X | Y = y), where y is a specific value of Y.

To know  more about probabilities  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

The mean of the dataset is 5.5.

To find the mean after creating dummy variables with driveway, gas heat, and aircon variables, we need to apply the following steps:

Collect Data

Create Dummy Variables

Calculate the Mean

Interpret Results

Collect Data.

Consider a dataset with driveway, gas heat, and aircon variables.

Suppose, we have the following data: 4, 2, 6, 8, 3, 9, 10, 5, 7, 1

Create Dummy Variables.

To create dummy variables, we need to convert categorical variables into numerical values.

Here, driveway, gas heat, and aircon variables are categorical variables with two possible outcomes.

So, we can convert these variables into 0 or 1. If the driveway is present, then we can assign 1, otherwise, 0.

Similarly, if gas heat or aircon is present, then we can assign 1, otherwise, 0.

Let's represent driveway, gas heat, and aircon variables with D, G, and A, respectively. Then, the dummy variables can be created as follows: D = {1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0} G = {1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0} A = {1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0}

Step 3: Calculate the Mean

To calculate the mean after creating dummy variables with driveway, gas heat, and aircon variables, we can add up all the values and divide the sum by the number of values.

The formula to calculate the mean is given as:

Mean = Sum of all values / Number of values. We can calculate the mean by using the following formula:

Mean = (4+2+6+8+3+9+10+5+7+1)/10= 55/10= 5.5.

The mean of the dataset is 5.5.

Interpret Results

The mean of the dataset is 5.5. It means that the average value of the given data is 5.5. The mean can be influenced by extreme values, so it is necessary to check the presence of outliers. If outliers are present, then it is better to use the median instead of the mean. The median is not affected by outliers.

Learn more about mean from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

The jogger's average speed is 0.136 km per minute.the jogger's average speed is 0.136 km per minute. This means that on average, the jogger covers a distance of 0.136 km every minute of their run.

To calculate the average speed, we need to determine the total distance covered and the total time taken. The jogger covered a distance of 4.0 km in 32 minutes, 2.0 km in 22 minutes, and 1.0 km in 16 minutes. The total distance is 4.0 km + 2.0 km + 1.0 km = 7.0 km, and the total time is 32 minutes + 22 minutes + 16 minutes = 70 minutes.

To find the average speed, we divide the total distance by the total time: 7.0 km ÷ 70 minutes = 0.1 km per minute. Therefore, the jogger's average speed is 0.1 km per minute or 0.136 km per minute (rounded to three decimal places).

Learn more about average speed here

brainly.com/question/17661499

#SPJ11

If the number of samples is doubled while keeping the same confidence level, the confidence interval would change by a factor of 1/√2.

The formula for the confidence interval is:

CI = Z × (σ / √n)

Where:

CI is the confidence interval,

Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level,

σ is the standard deviation of the population, and

n is the sample size.

When the number of samples is doubled, n becomes 2n.

Plugging this into the formula, we get:

CI' = Z × (σ / √(2n))

Dividing CI' by CI to determine the change in the confidence interval:

CI' / CI = (Z × (σ / √(2n))) / (Z × (σ / √n))

CI' / CI = (√n / √(2n))

CI' / CI = √(n / (2n))

CI' / CI = √(1/2)

CI' / CI = 1/√2

Therefore, when the number of samples is doubled while keeping the same confidence level, the confidence interval would change by a factor of 1/√2 or approximately 0.707.

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/30218856

#SPJ4

The probability that at least 1 out of 5 randomly selected American children (ages 3 to 5) is read to every day by someone at home is approximately 0.996.

The concept of probability is used to analyze and predict outcomes in various fields, including mathematics, statistics, physics, economics, and everyday life. It is based on the understanding that in a well-defined and controlled situation, the relative frequency of an event occurring approaches a stable value as the number of trials or observations increases.

The probability of a child being read to every day by someone at home is 58%, which can be expressed as 0.58. Therefore, the probability of a child not being read to every day is 1 - 0.58 = 0.42.

To find the probability that at least 1 out of 5 children is read to every day, we can calculate the complement of the probability that none of the 5 children is read to every day.

P(at least 1 read) = 1 - P(none read)

P(none read) = (0.42)⁵

P(at least 1 read) = 1 - (0.42)⁵

P(at least 1 read) ≈ 0.994.

learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/12691315

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

DE = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]AC = 4 units

Answer:

Given:-

AB = AC

Also , BD and CE are two medians

Hence , 

E is the midpoint of AB and

D is the midpoint of CE

Hence ,

1/2 AB = 1/2AC

BE = CD 

In Δ BEC and ΔCDB ,

BE = CD [ Given ]

∠EBC = ∠DCB [ Angles opposite to equal sides AB and AC ]

BC = CB [ Common ]

Hence ,

Δ BEC ≅ ΔCDB [ SAS ]

BD = CE (by CPCT)

Step-by-step explanation:

4 units hope this helps... and pls mark me as brainliest if u want

The base area of the triangular prism is A = (1/2)(a)(h).

To find the value of "a" in the given triangular prism with a volume of 160 cubic inches, we need to use the formula for the volume of a prism. The formula for the volume of a prism is V = Ah, where "A" represents the base area of the prism and "h" represents the height of the prism.

In this case, the prism is triangular, so the base shape is a triangle. The formula for the area of a triangle is A = (1/2)bh, where "b" represents the base length of the triangle and "h" represents the height of the triangle.

Let's assume the base length of the triangle is "a" and the height of the triangle is "h". Therefore, the base area of the triangular prism is A = (1/2)(a)(h).

Given that the volume of the prism is 160 cubic inches, we can set up the equation as follows:

160 = (1/2)(a)(h) * h

Simplifying the equation:

320 = ah^2

To find the value of "a", we need the value of "h". Unfortunately, the problem does not provide the height of the prism or any other information that would allow us to determine the value of "h". Without the value of "h", we cannot find the exact value of "a".

Therefore, the value of "a" cannot be determined based on the given information.

for more such question on triangular visit

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ8

To determine if the number of occurrences across categories is random, a nonparametric procedure that can be used is the chi-squared test for independence.

The chi-squared test for independence is used to assess the relationship between two categorical variables. It compares the observed frequencies in each category with the expected frequencies that would occur under the assumption of independence between the variables. The test calculates a chi-squared statistic and compares it to the critical chi-squared value at a given significance level.

Here are the steps to perform the chi-squared test for independence:

1. Set up hypotheses:

  - Null hypothesis (H0): The variables are independent (the distribution of occurrences is random).

  - Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The variables are dependent (the distribution of occurrences is not random).

2. Create a contingency table:

  Construct a contingency table that shows the observed frequencies for each category combination.

3. Calculate expected frequencies:

  Calculate the expected frequencies for each category combination under the assumption of independence. The expected frequency for each cell can be determined by multiplying the row total by the column total and dividing by the grand total.

4. Calculate the chi-squared statistic:

  Compute the chi-squared statistic using the formula:

  chi2 = Σ[(observed - expected)^2 / expected]

5. Determine the critical value:

  Look up the critical chi-squared value in the chi-squared distribution table for the desired significance level and degrees of freedom. The degrees of freedom can be calculated as (r - 1) * (c - 1), where r is the number of rows and c is the number of columns in the contingency table.

6. Compare the chi-squared statistic to the critical value:

  If the chi-squared statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence of a relationship between the variables. If the chi-squared statistic is less than or equal to the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no significant evidence of a relationship between the variables.

Note that the chi-squared test for independence is a nonparametric test and does not rely on any assumptions about the underlying distribution of the data. It is commonly used when analyzing categorical data to determine if there is a significant association between variables.

To know more about statistic visit-

brainly.com/question/28261209

#SPJ11

a) The calculated t-value (-3.64) is beyond the critical t-value (-2.069), we can conclude that the drug has a significant effect on aggression at the alpha level of 0.05, two-tails. b) The calculated Cohen's d is approximately -1.51.

a. To determine if the drug has a significant effect on aggression, we can perform an independent-measures t-test. We will compare the mean number of aggressive responses in the control group with the mean number of aggressive responses in the low serotonin group.

First, let's calculate the degrees of freedom:

[tex]d_f = (n_1 + n_2) - 2 = (10 + 15) - 2 = 23[/tex]

Next, let's calculate the pooled standard deviation (sp) using the formula:

[tex]s_p = \sqrt{(SS1 + SS2) / (n_1 + n_2 - 2))} \\s_p = \sqrt{x / (10 + 15 - 2))}\\s_p = \sqrt{(310.5 / 23)} \\s_p = 3.31[/tex]

Now, let's calculate the t-value using the formula:

[tex]t = (M_1 - M_2) / (s_p * \sqrt{(1/n_1) + (1/n_2)} ))\\t = (14 - 19) / (3.31 * \sqrt{(1/10) + (1/15)} ))\\t = -5 / (3.31 * \sqrt{(0.1 + 0.0667)} )\\t = -5 / (3.31 * 0.415)\\t = -5 / 1.373\\t = -3.64[/tex]

Finally, we can compare the calculated t-value with the critical t-value at a significance level of 0.05 with 23 degrees of freedom. Since we are using a two-tailed test, we divide the alpha level by 2 and find the critical t-value. Let's assume a significance level of 0.05:

t_critical = ±2.069

Since the calculated t-value (-3.64) is beyond the critical t-value (-2.069), we can conclude that the drug has a significant effect on aggression at the alpha level of 0.05, two-tails.

b. To compute Cohen's d, we can use the formula:

[tex]d = (M_1 - M_2) / s_p\\d = (14 - 19) / 3.31\\d = -5 / 3.31\\d = -1.51[/tex]

The calculated Cohen's d is approximately -1.51. Cohen's d provides a measure of the effect size, indicating the magnitude of the difference between the means of the two groups. In this case, the negative value indicates that the low serotonin group has a lower mean number of aggressive responses compared to the control group, and the magnitude of the effect is considered large.

To know more about critical t-value visit:

brainly.com/question/30404845

#SPJ4

The linear inequalities that represents the problem are;

1. g ≥ 3

2. h ≤ 7

3. h > 0

4. g + h ≤ 10

b. The graph of the linear inequalities is attached below

a. To solve this problem, we have to express these conditions as inequalities;

1. The man always has at least 3 guinea-pigs to sell:

This can be expressed as g ≥ 3

2. The man never keeps more than 7 hamsters in stock:

This can be expressed as h ≤ 7

3. The man never runs out of hamsters to sell:

This can be expressed as h > 0

4. The maximum number of rodents he can keep is 10:

This can be expressed as g + h ≤ 10

b. To sketch these region as on pair of axes, we need to use a graphing calculator for this.

assuming;

x represents g = guinea-pigs

y represents h = hamsters

The graph of the inequalities is attached below;

Learn more on graph of linear inequality here;

https://brainly.com/question/25839052

#SPJ4

The dimensions that would give the suitcase the maximum volume but still accomplish this regulation are 43 cm x 43 cm x 43 cm.

We already know that by adding all the sides, the result should be less than 129 cm, this can be represented with the following mathematical expression.

L + W + H ≤ 129

Moreover, if we consider ideally the length, width, and height should be the same, the inequality would be:

3x ≤ 129

This inequality can be solved as follows:

x ≤ 129/3

x ≤ 43

Based on this, we can conclude that the maximum value for x is 43 cm.

Note: This question is incomplete; here is the complete question:

An international airline has a regulation that each passenger can carry a suitcase having the sum of its width, length, and height less than or equal to 129cm. Find the dimensions of the suitcase of the maximum volume that a passenger may carry under this regulation.

Learn more about dimensions in https://brainly.com/question/31106945

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The image of point P(-8, 1) after a counterclockwise rotation of 90° about (-3, 7) is located at (3, 2).

To find the location of the image of point P(-8, 1) after a counterclockwise rotation of 90° about the center point (-3, 7), we can use the rotation formula:

(x', y') = (a + (x - a) * cosθ - (y - b) * sinθ, b + (x - a) * sinθ + (y - b) * cosθ)

In this formula, (x', y') represents the coordinates of the image point, (x, y) represents the coordinates of the original point, (a, b) represents the center of rotation, and θ represents the angle of rotation.

Plugging in the values, we have:

(a, b) = (-3, 7)

(x, y) = (-8, 1)

θ = 90°

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

(x', y') = (-3 + (-8 + 3) * cos90° - (1 - 7) * sin90°, 7 + (-8 + 3) * sin90° + (1 - 7) * cos90°)

Simplifying the equation further:

(x', y') = (-3 - 5 * cos90° + 6 * sin90°, 7 - 5 * sin90° - 6 * cos90°)

Calculating the trigonometric functions:

(x', y') = (-3 - 5 * 0 + 6 * 1, 7 - 5 * 1 - 6 * 0)

(x', y') = (-3 + 6, 7 - 5)

(x', y') = (3, 2)

For more such questions on trignometric functions

https://brainly.com/question/25618616

#SPJ8

The probability of winning is 0.00078395061 or approximately 0.078%.

There are five dice, and each dice has six sides.

There are a total of 6^5 possible outcomes.

This gives us 7776 possible outcomes.

We want to find the probability that we get at least four 6s in the next round.

The probability of getting exactly four 6s can be found by using the binomial distribution, which is given by the formula:

P(4) = (5 choose 4) * (1/6)^4 * (5/6)^1

P(4) = 5 * (1/6)^4 * (5/6)^1

P(4) = 0.00077160493

The probability of getting exactly five 6s can be found in a similar way:

P(5) = (5 choose 5) * (1/6)^5 * (5/6)^0

P(5) = 1 * (1/6)^5 * (5/6)^0

P(5) = 0.00001234568

The probability of getting at least four 6s is the sum of the probabilities of getting exactly four 6s and exactly five 6s.

P(at least 4) = P(4) + P(5)

P(at least 4) = 0.00077160493 + 0.00001234568

P(at least 4) = 0.00078395061

So, the probability of winning the next round by rolling at least four number 6's is 0.00078395061. This is equivalent to approximately 0.078%. Hence, the probability of winning is 0.00078395061 or approximately 0.078% which is calculated by using binomial distribution formula.

Learn more about the probability from the given link-

https://brainly.com/question/23417919

#SPJ11

The probability of scoring above 400 is 0.79 or 79%.

The probability that a student who scored above 400 reviewed for the test is approximately 0.753 or 75.3%.

The events are,

A = Student spent at least five hours studying GMAT review guides.

B = Student scored above 400.

Probabilities are,

Probability of scoring above 400 given that the student spent at least five hours studying GMAT review guides

P(B|A) = 0.85

Probability of scoring above 400 given that the student did not spend at least five hours studying GMAT review guides.

P(B|A') = 0.65

Probability that a student spent at least five hours studying GMAT review guides.

P(A) = 0.70

a. Find the probability of scoring above 400,

find P(B), use the Law of Total Probability,

which states that the probability of an event can be calculated by considering all possible ways the event can occur.

P(B)

= P(B|A) × P(A) + P(B|A') × P(A')

= 0.85 × 0.70 + 0.65 × (1 - 0.70)

= 0.595 + 0.195

= 0.79

b. The probability that a student who scored above 400 reviewed for the test,

To find P(A|B),

Use Bayes' theorem, which relates the conditional probabilities of two events.

P(A|B)

= (P(B|A) × P(A)) / P(B)

= (0.85 × 0.70) / 0.79

= 0.595 / 0.79

= 0.753

Therefore, the probability of scoring above 400 is 0.79  and probability of a student who scored above 400 reviewed for test is  0.753 .

Learn more about probability here

brainly.com/question/20335010

#SPJ4

The best response functions for Player 1 and Player 2 are x = y/2 and y = -1/2, respectively. The rational reaction sets are given by x = y/2 and y = -1/2. The Nash equilibrium is x = y/2 = -1/4.

To find the best response functions, we need to determine the strategy that maximizes the payoff for each player given the other player's strategy. For Player 1, the best response function can be obtained by maximizing U1(x, y) = xy - x^2 with respect to x. Taking the derivative and setting it to zero, we find that the best response function for Player 1 is x = y/2.

Similarly, for Player 2, the best response function can be obtained by maximizing U2(x, y) = x + yy with respect to y. Taking the derivative and setting it to zero, we find that the best response function for Player 2 is y = -1/2.

The rational reaction sets for each player represent the set of strategies that maximize their payoffs given the other player's strategy. For Player 1, the rational reaction set is a line given by x = y/2. For Player 2, the rational reaction set is a single point, y = -1/2.

To find the Nash equilibria, we need to identify the combinations of strategies where both players are playing their best responses to each other. In this case, the Nash equilibrium occurs when both x and y satisfy the best response functions simultaneously. Substituting the best response functions into each other, we find that the Nash equilibrium is x = y/2 = -1/4.

In summary, the best response functions for Player 1 and Player 2 are x = y/2 and y = -1/2, respectively. The rational reaction sets are given by x = y/2 and y = -1/2. The Nash equilibrium is x = y/2 = -1/4. These results provide insights into the optimal strategies for each player and the stable outcomes of the game.

To learn more about derivative click here, brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11