Select the statement that best describes SST. Question 3 options: SST measures the variability of the actual data. SST measures the variability between the data and the best guess at a linear model of the data. A large SST guarantees that the independent and dependent variables are related. A low SST minimizes the error between the data's actual y values and the model's y values

Marquise ran a total of 3 and 1/4 miles, with 2/3 of his run taking place in a park.

we need to calculate 2/3 of his total run. First, we convert the mixed fraction of 3 and 1/4 into an improper fraction. Multiplying the whole number (3) by the denominator (4) and adding the numerator (1) gives us 13/4. Now, we add this fraction to the remaining fraction of 1/4, resulting in a total of 14/4.

Next, we determine how many miles Marquise ran through the park. Since 2/3 of his run took place in the park, we multiply 14/4 by 2/3. To do this, we multiply the numerators (14 * 2 = 28) and multiply the denominators (4 * 3 = 12), giving us 28/12.

To simplify the fraction, we can divide both the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 4. Dividing 28 by 4 yields 7, and dividing 12 by 4 gives us 3. Hence, Marquise ran approximately 7/3 or 2.3 miles through the park, rounded to one decimal place,

Learn more about total here:

https://brainly.com/question/32027918

#SPJ11

the probability that an individual is really allergic to cats given a positive test result is approximately 0.0985 or 9.85%.

To determine the probability that an individual is really allergic to cats given a positive test result, we can use Bayes' theorem.

Let's define the following probabilities:

P(A) = Probability of being allergic to cats = 0.01 (1% of the population)

P(T) = Probability of a positive test result

P(T|A) = Probability of a positive test result given that the individual is allergic to cats (true positive rate) = 0.80

P(T|not A) = Probability of a positive test result given that the individual is not allergic to cats (false positive rate) = 0.10

We want to find P(A|T), the probability of being allergic to cats given a positive test result.

According to Bayes' theorem:

P(A|T) = (P(T|A) * P(A)) / P(T)

To calculate P(T), we need to consider both the true positive cases (allergic individuals who test positive) and the false positive cases (non-allergic individuals who test positive):

P(T) = P(T|A) * P(A) + P(T|not A) * P(not A)

P(not A) represents the probability of not being allergic to cats, which is equal to 1 - P(A).

Let's substitute the given values into the formula:

P(T) = (0.80 * 0.01) + (0.10 * (1 - 0.01)) = 0.0809

Now we can calculate P(A|T):

P(A|T) = (0.80 * 0.01) / 0.0809 ≈ 0.0985

Therefore, the probability that an individual is really allergic to cats given a positive test result is approximately 0.0985 or 9.85%.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ4

To express 80 mm^2 as a fraction of 2.4 cm^2 in its simplest form, we need to convert both measurements to the same unit.

To solve the problem, we first convert the measurement of 2.4 cm^2 to mm2 so that both measurements are in the same unit. We know that 1 cm is equal to 10 mm. Therefore, to convert cm^2 to mm^2, we need to multiply the measurement by 100, since 10 mm multiplied by 10 mm gives us 100 mm2.

Multiplying 2.4 cm^2 by 100 gives us 240 mm^2. Now, we have two measurements in 2: 80 mm^2 and 240 mm^2. To express 80 mm^2 as a fraction of 240 mm^2, we divide 80 by 240. Simplifying this fraction, we can divide both the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common divisor, which in this case is 80.

When we divide 80 by 80, we get 1, and when we divide 240 by 80, we get 3. Therefore, the fraction 80 mm 2/240 mm^2 can be simplified to 1/3. This means that 80 mm^2 is equal to one-third of 240 mm^2.

In conclusion, to express 80 mm2 as a fraction of 2.4 cm^2 in its simplest form, we convert both measurements to mm^2 and find that 80 mm^2 is equivalent to 1/3 of 240 mm^2.

To learn more about mm^2 - brainly.com/question/31295427

#SPJ11

The standard error of the sample mean is 3.85 (option d), indicating the average amount of deviation between the sample mean and the population means in the study of commuting times in Clairmont.

The standard error of the sample mean is a measure of the variability or dispersion of the sample mean from the true population mean. It represents the average amount of error that can be expected when estimating the population mean based on a sample.

To calculate the standard error of the sample mean, we use the formula:

Standard Error = Standard Deviation / √(Sample Size)

In this case, the standard deviation is given as 27.2, and the sample size is 50. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

Standard Error = 27.2 / √50 = 3.85

Therefore, the standard error of the sample mean is approximately 3.85. This indicates the average amount of deviation we can expect between the sample mean and the population mean.

To learn more about Standard error, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30404883

#SPJ11

The equation, T(p) which models the total number of tickets sold as a sum of N(p) and S(p) is 0.2p² + 79p + 12700

Total number of tickets sold can be related as follows :

S(p) = 61p + 8400

N(p) = 0.2p² + 18p + 4300

Hence,

T(p) = (61p + 8400) + (0.2p² + 18p + 4300)

Collect like terms

T(p) = 61p + 18p + 8400 + 4300 + 0.2p²

T(p) = 0.2p² + 79p + 12700

Therefore, the total number of tickets sold can be written as :

Learn more on equations : https://brainly.com/question/30164833

#SPJ4

Complete question:

At a certain school, the number of student tickets sold for a home football game can be modeled by S(p)=61p+8400, where p is the winning percent of the home team. The number of nonstudent tickets sold for these home games is given by N(p)=0. 2p^2+18p+4300.

An equation for the total number of tickets sold for a home football game at this school as a function of the winning percent p is T(p) - (Use integers or decimals for any numbers in the expression.)

Deon takes 5 hours to run the half marathon.

We are supposed to find the amount of time Deon takes to run the half marathon.

First, we convert the mixed fraction to an improper fraction by multiplying the denominator by the whole number and adding the numerator to the result 6 1/4 = 25/4 hours

Therefore, Kerri takes 25/4 hours to run the half marathon.

Now, let's find out the amount of time Deon takes to run the half marathon.

Deon runs the same race in 4/5 the amount of time.

We can calculate the amount of time Deon takes to run the half marathon by multiplying Kerri's time by 4/5.

Let's do this: 25/4 × 4/5= 5

The amount of time Deon takes to run the half marathon is 5 hours.

learn more about marathon from given link

https://brainly.com/question/23844021

#SPJ11

Carol is likely taking a test called a True-False Test or a True-False Questionnaire.

Based on the information,

Carol is taking a questionnaire consisting of more than 500 true-false items.

In a True-False Test, the test-taker is presented with a series of statements or propositions .

And is required to determine whether each statement is true or false.

This type of test is commonly used in educational settings to assess,

a person's knowledge, understanding, or critical thinking skills on a particular subject.

The test may cover a specific subject area or a range of topics, depending on the purpose of the assessment.

By answering each true-false question, the test-taker demonstrates their ability to evaluate the accuracy of the statements presented.

It's worth noting that the term "true-false test" is often used interchangeably with terms like "multiple-choice test" or "objective test".

Since they all involve selecting the correct answer from a given set of options.

Therefore, questionnaire based on true-false test, the options are limited to 'true' or 'false' for each statement.

learn more about questionnaire here

brainly.com/question/15021447

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Carol is asked to complete a questionnaire made up of more than 500 true-false items. What test is she taking?

3600 in. is equal to 25 square feet, calculated using two unit multipliers.

To convert 3600 in. to square feet, there are two unit multipliers we can use: 1 ft/12 in and (1 ft/12 in)^2. Here's how to perform the conversion:

Multiply 3600 in. by 1 ft/12 in (the first multiplier) to convert inches to feet:

3600 in. × (1 ft/12 in) = 300 ft

Multiply 300 ft by (1 ft/12 in)^2 (the second multiplier) to convert square feet back to square inches:

300 ft × (1 ft/12 in)^2 = 3600 sq in.

Since you initially had 3600 sq in, which is equivalent to 25 sq ft (because 1 sq ft = 144 sq in), your final answer is:

3600 in. = 25 sq ft

Therefore, 3600 in. is equal to 25 square feet.

Learn more about unit multipliers

https://brainly.com/question/30304643

#SPJ11

The combination of large size, deep drilling ability, suitable working conditions, and advanced technology make oil drilling ships an optimal starting point for scientists seeking to design a ship capable of investigating the seafloor.

Oil drilling ships possess several qualities that make them an excellent starting point for scientists designing a ship to investigate the seafloor. These qualities include:

In conclusion, the combination of large size, deep drilling ability, suitable working conditions, and advanced technology make oil drilling ships an optimal starting point for scientists seeking to design a ship capable of investigating the seafloor.

Learn more about seafloor

https://brainly.com/question/12659717

#SPJ11

Considering the extremas, the graph D represents the situation in this problem.

For this problem, we have that 33 days is the period between the relative maximums of the function, hence graph D represents the situation in this problem.

More can be learned about relative minimums of a function at https://brainly.com/question/9839310

#SPJ1

The probability that a student chosen randomly from the class does not have a sister is 0.529 or 52.9%.

From the data table, there are a total of 8 students who have a sister and 9 students who do not have a sister.

The total number of students in the class is the sum of the students in each category: students with a sister (8) + students without a sister (9) = 17.

Therefore, the probability that a student chosen randomly from the class does not have a sister is:

Probability = Number of students without a sister / Total number of students

Probability = 9 / 17

Probability ≈ 0.529 or 52.9%

Learn more about probability at:

#SPJ1

Brutus Construction Company pays approximately 0.80% of the outstanding principal in interest each month.

To calculate the percentage of the outstanding principal that Brutus Construction Company pays in interest each month,

Calculate the monthly interest rate.

The Annual Percentage Rate (APR) is 9.60%.

To find the monthly interest rate, we divide the APR by 12: 9.60% / 12 = 0.80% (0.008 in decimal form).

Determine the number of months for the loan.

The loan is for five years, so the number of months is 5 years× 12 months/year = 60 months.

Calculate the monthly payment.

To calculate the monthly payment,

we can use a loan amortization formula or financial calculator.

For the purpose of this calculation,

we'll assume the loan is fully amortizing,

meaning the principal and interest are paid off by the end of the loan term.

In this case, the monthly payment can be calculated by dividing the total loan amount by the number of months:

$1,235,000 / 60 = $20,583.33.

Calculate the interest payment for the first month.

The interest payment for the first month can be calculated by multiplying the outstanding principal (initial loan amount) by the monthly interest rate:

$1,235,000×0.008 = $9,880.

Calculate the percentage of the outstanding principal paid in interest each month.

To find the percentage, we divide the interest payment for the month by the outstanding principal and multiply by 100:

($9,880 / $1,235,000) × 100 ≈ 0.80%.

Learn more about outstanding principal here:

https://brainly.com/question/31789894
#SPJ4

The probability that a German child recognized both SpongeBob and Squidward is 0.76 or 76%.

The probability that a German child recognized both SpongeBob and Squidward can be calculated using conditional probability.

Here, we will use Bayes' theorem to find the probability.

Let A be the event that a child recognized Sponge Bob and B be the event that a child recognized Squidward.

Then we need to find the probability of A and B occurring together.

Using Bayes' theorem, we can write:

P(B|A) = P(A|B)P(B) / P(A)

where P(B|A) is the probability of B given A,

P(A|B) is the probability of A given B,

P(B) is the probability of B,

and P(A) is the probability of A.

Here, P(B) = 0.87 (given),

P(A) = 0.9 (given),

and P(A|B) = P(A and B) / P(B).

We know that 90% of children under 13 in Germany recognized SpongeBob.

So, out of 100 children, 90 recognized SpongeBob.

Of these 90, 87% recognized Squidward.

So, the number of children who recognized both SpongeBob and Squidward is 0.87 × 90

= 78.

So, P(A and B)

= 78/100

= 0.78

Substituting these values in Bayes' theorem, we get:

P(B|A) = (0.78 / 0.87) × 0.87 / 0.9

= 0.76

The probability that a German child recognized both SpongeBob and Squidward is 0.76 or 76%.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Using the area formula for a rectangle and considering the geometric properties of a trapezoid, we have derived the formula for finding the area of a trapezoid.

The formula for the area of a trapezoid can be derived by using the area formula for a rectangle and some mathematical properties.

Let's consider a trapezoid with bases of lengths b1 and b2, and a height h. To find the area of the trapezoid, we can break it down into two parts: a rectangle and two right triangles.

Start by drawing a straight line parallel to the bases of the trapezoid to create a rectangle.

The length of the rectangle is the average of the lengths of the two bases: (b1 + b2) / 2.

The width of the rectangle is equal to the height of the trapezoid: h.

The area of the rectangle is given by the formula: Area_rectangle = length * width = ((b1 + b2) / 2) * h.

Now, we need to subtract the areas of the two right triangles formed outside the rectangle.

Each right triangle has a base equal to the difference between one of the trapezoid bases and the length of the rectangle: (b1 - ((b1 + b2) / 2)) and (b2 - ((b1 + b2) / 2)).

The height of each right triangle is equal to the height of the trapezoid: h.

The area of a right triangle is given by the formula: Area_triangle = (base * height) / 2.

Therefore, the combined area of the two right triangles is: 2 * [(b1 - ((b1 + b2) / 2)) * h / 2].

Simplifying the expression: (b1 - ((b1 + b2) / 2)) * h = (b1 - b1/2 - b2/2) * h = (b1/2 - b2/2) * h = ((b1 - b2) / 2) * h.

Adding the area of the rectangle and subtracting the combined area of the two right triangles, we get the formula for the area of the trapezoid:

Area_trapezoid = ((b1 + b2) / 2) * h - ((b1 - b2) / 2) * h.

Simplifying further, we can factor out the common factor of h:

Area_trapezoid = (b1 + b2 - (b1 - b2)) * h / 2.

Finally, simplifying the expression within the parentheses:

Area_trapezoid = (2b2) * h / 2.

This simplifies to the formula for the area of a trapezoid:

Area_trapezoid = (b1 + b2) * h / 2.

Therefore, using the area formula for a rectangle and considering the geometric properties of a trapezoid, we have derived the formula for finding the area of a trapezoid.

for such more question on rectangle

https://brainly.com/question/17297081

#SPJ11

The dimensions of the rectangular play yard are 30 feet by 18 feet.

Let's assume that the length of the rectangular play yard is L and the width is W.

The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula: P = 2L + 2W.

According to the problem, the Browns installed 96 feet of fencing, so we have:

2L + 2W = 96 (Equation 1)

The area of a rectangle is given by the formula: A = L * W.

According to the problem, the area of the play yard is 540 square feet, so we have:

L * W = 540 (Equation 2)

To solve this system of equations, we can use substitution or elimination. Let's use substitution:

From Equation 2, we can isolate L:

L = 540 / W

Now substitute this expression for L in Equation 1:

2(540 / W) + 2W = 96

Multiply through by W to eliminate the fraction:

[tex]2(540) + 2W^2 = 96W\\1080 + 2W^2 = 96W[/tex]

Rearrange the equation:

[tex]2W^2 - 96W + 1080 = 0[/tex]

Divide through by 2 to simplify:

[tex]W^2 - 48W + 540 = 0[/tex]

Now we can solve this quadratic equation to find the values of W, which represents the width of the play yard. Once we have the value of W, we can substitute it back into Equation 2 to find the corresponding length, L.

Using the quadratic formula:

W = (-b ± [tex]\sqrt{(b^2 - 4ac)}[/tex]) / (2a)

For the equation [tex]W^2 - 48W + 540 = 0,[/tex] we have a = 1, b = -48, and c = 540.

Plugging these values into the quadratic formula, we get:

W = (-(-48) ± √[tex]\sqrt{((-48)^2 - 4(1)(540))}[/tex]) / (2(1))

= (48 ± [tex]\sqrt{(2304 - 2160)}[/tex]) / 2

= (48 ± [tex]\sqrt{144}[/tex]) / 2

= (48 ± 12) / 2

So, we have two possible values for W:

W1 = (48 + 12) / 2 = 60 / 2 = 30

W2 = (48 - 12) / 2 = 36 / 2 = 18

Now substitute these values of W back into Equation 2 to find the corresponding lengths:

For W = 30:

L = 540 / 30 = 18

For W = 18:

L = 540 / 18 = 30

Therefore, the dimensions of the rectangular play yard are 30 feet by 18 feet.

Know more about rectangle here:

brainly.com/question/19819849

#SPJ4

The margin of error for a 99% confidence interval estimate is approximately 0.0838 or 8.38%.

To calculate the margin of error for a 99% confidence interval estimate, we can use the formula:

Margin of Error = Z * sqrt(p_hat * (1 - p_hat) / n)

Where:

Z is the z-value corresponding to the desired confidence level (99% confidence level corresponds to a z-value of approximately 2.576).

p_hat is the sample proportion (percentage of apples with bruises), which is calculated as the number of apples with bruises divided by the total sample size.

n is the sample size.

Given:

Sample size (n) = 100

Number of apples with bruises = 12

Calculating the sample proportion:

p_hat = 12 / 100 = 0.12

Using the z-value for a 99% confidence level (z = 2.576), we can calculate the margin of error:

Margin of Error = 2.576 * sqrt(0.12 * (1 - 0.12) / 100)

Calculating the margin of error:

Margin of Error = 2.576 * sqrt(0.12 * 0.88 / 100)

Margin of Error = 2.576 * sqrt(0.1056 / 100)

Margin of Error = 2.576 * sqrt(0.001056)

Margin of Error ≈ 2.576 * 0.0325

Margin of Error ≈ 0.0838

Therefore, the margin of error for a 99% confidence interval estimate is approximately 0.0838 or 8.38%.

for such more question on confidence interval

https://brainly.com/question/14771284

#SPJ11

The shaded area of the 22mm face of the cylinder is approximately 380 square millimeters.

To find the shaded area of the 22mm face of the cylinder, we need to determine the area of the circular face.

The formula for the area of a circle is:

Area = π * radius^2

The radius of the circular face is half of the diameter, which is 22mm, the radius would be 22mm / 2 = 11mm.

Substituting the radius into the area formula:

Area = π * (11mm)^2

Calculating the value:

Area ≈ 3.14159 * (11mm)^2

≈ 3.14159 * 121mm^2

≈ 380.1327mm^2

Rounding the area to the nearest whole number:

Area ≈ 380mm^2

Therefore, the shaded area of the 22mm face of the cylinder is approximately 380 square millimeters.

To read more about cylinder, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9554871

#SPJ11

Robin and 2 friends each jumped rope for 4/5 of a minute. To find the total time they jumped rope altogether, we need to multiply the individual time by the number of participants.

Since Robin and 2 friends each jumped rope for 4/5 of a minute, we can calculate the total time by multiplying the individual time by the number of participants.

Individual time: 4/5 minute

Number of participants: 3 (Robin and 2 friends)

To find the total time, we multiply the individual time by the number of participants:

Total time = (4/5) minute * 3

To multiply fractions, we multiply the numerators and denominators separately:

Total time = (4 * 3) / (5 * 1)

Simplifying the multiplication:

Total time = 12 / 5

Therefore, Robin and 2 friends jumped rope for a total of 12/5 minutes, which can also be expressed as 2 and 2/5 minutes or 2.4 minutes.

Learn more about multiply here: brainly.com/question/23536361

#SPJ11

The value of k in Chebyshev's theorem can be any positive real number.

Chebyshev's theorem, also known as Chebyshev's inequality, is a statistical theorem that provides an upper bound on the proportion of observations that lie within a certain number of standard deviations from the mean in any distribution.

The theorem states that for any distribution (regardless of its shape), at least [tex](1 - 1/k^2)[/tex] proportion of the data falls within k standard deviations from the mean, where k is any positive number greater than 1.

Mathematically, Chebyshev's theorem can be expressed as:

P(|X - μ| < kσ) ≥ [tex]1 - 1/k^2[/tex]

Where:

P(|X - μ| < kσ) represents the probability that a randomly selected observation from the distribution falls within k standard deviations from the mean.

μ represents the mean of the distribution.

σ represents the standard deviation of the distribution.

k is the number of standard deviations from the mean.

The value of k in Chebyshev's theorem can be any positive real number.

Learn more about Chebyshev's theorem at:

brainly.com/question/231802

#SPJ4

Robin earns $689 in total.

To calculate Robin's earnings, we need to determine two components: the fixed base salary of $560 per week and the additional earnings based on the sales.

First, let's calculate the additional earnings based on sales over $6,500. The sales amount exceeding $6,500 is $10,800 - $6,500 = $4,300.

Next, we need to find 3% of the sales exceeding $6,500:

Additional earnings = 3% * ($4,300) = 0.03 * ($4,300) = $129.

Now, we can calculate Robin's total earnings by adding the base salary and the additional earnings:

Total earnings = Base salary + Additional earnings

             = $560 + $129

             = $689.

Therefore, Robin earns $689 in total.

Know more about earnings here:

brainly.com/question/31280058

#SPJ4

1. The special angles used to create an equation to find x is: same-side exterior angles.    2. x = 24      3. Measure of angle 6 = 79°.

1. In the image attached below, which shows transversal D intercepting lines A and B that are parallel, the special angles created by this intersection is known as same-side exterior angles, which are supplementary. Thus, to find x, the equation created will be:

3x + 7 + 4x + 5 = 180

2. Solve to find x:

3x + 7 + 4x + 5 = 180

Combine like terms:

7x + 12 = 180

7x = 180 - 12

7x = 168

x = 168/7

x = 24

3. Measure of angle 6 = 3x + 7 [corresponding angles are equal]

Plug in the value of x:

Measure of angle 6 = 3(24) + 7

= 79°

Learn more about special angles on:

https://brainly.com/question/28824597

#SPJ4

Clary means that everyone has some darkness inside, when she tells Lina. Clary means that everyone has some bad side to them. It's up to us whether we act on that or not. Lina is a kind girl, but she also has a bad side. She is not always happy and sometimes she gets angry. Doon is also a good boy, but he also has a bad side.

He can get mad easily and he sometimes is impatient. Both of these characters show that everyone has a good side and a bad side.The darkness that we have detected in Lina is that she is not always happy. She can get angry and upset. She also has a hard time dealing with people who are mean to her. Doon can also be impatient and get mad easily. He is a good boy, but he also has a bad side like Lina. He has a hard time controlling his emotions when he gets upset.

In conclusion, Clary means that everyone has some bad side to them. It's up to us whether we act on that or not. Lina and Doon show that everyone has a good side and a bad side.

Learn more about darkness

https://brainly.com/question/931623

#SPJ11

The study examining the effect of two strength-training programs (balance ball vs. stationary exercise equipment) on blood pressure and cholesterol levels in women over 60 is a double-blind randomized experiment.

What is a double-blind randomized experiment? A double-blind randomized experiment is a type of experiment where neither the experimenter nor the study subjects know what treatment the subject is receiving. In this type of experiment, the participants are randomly assigned to a treatment group. This type of experiment aims to reduce the placebo effect and reduce bias from the experimenter or study participants.

What is the purpose of the study? The purpose of the study was to determine the effect on blood pressure and cholesterol levels in women over the age of 60 of two different strength-training programs, one involving the use of a balance ball and the other using stationary exercise equipment. The subjects were aware of the purpose of the study, but they were not told that there were two different treatment groups involved. The cholesterol levels and blood pressure of subjects were measured at the start and at the end of the eight weeks.

What is the result of the study? The result of the study was not included in the question, so it is not possible to determine the result of the study. However, the study is an example of a double-blind randomized experiment, which is used to reduce the placebo effect and reduce bias from the experimenter or study participants.

In this scenario, the study involves randomly dividing the participants into two equal-sized experimental groups. The participants and the medical technician are unaware of which group each participant belongs to, indicating a double-blind setup. This helps to minimize potential biases and ensure objective measurements of blood pressure and cholesterol levels. The use of double-blind methodology is common in experiments to reduce the influence of bias and increase the reliability of the results.

Learn more about the double-blind randomized experiment at:

brainly.com/question/31417485

#SPJ11

The statement that the Mandate of Heaven was a belief that the emperor of China was chosen by heaven to rule is true.

The Mandate of Heaven was a central concept in ancient Chinese political and philosophical beliefs. It was the belief that heaven granted the emperor the right to rule based on their virtue and ability to govern justly.

According to this belief, if a ruler became corrupt or failed to govern effectively, they could lose the Mandate of Heaven, leading to their downfall or even the collapse of a dynasty. The concept of the Mandate of Heaven provided a philosophical justification for the emperor's authority and legitimacy as the ruler of China.

To learn more about China click here: brainly.com/question/10231207

#SPJ11

Yes, at 1% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to support this claim.

N1(Bottles of own production) = 120, N2(Bottles of competing company) = 45,

X1(pH value of their own company) = 7.25, X2(pH value of the competing company) = 7.48,

s1= 0.004, s2 = 0.003

The null and alternative hypotheses are given as:

Null Hypothesis (H0): µ1 = µ2

Alternative Hypothesis(H1): µ1 < µ2

The level of significance is 1% and the sample sizes of both the groups are large enough. We use z-test for the difference of means. The z-statistic is given as:

z = (X1 - X2) / [√(s12/N1 + s22/N2)]

Here, the value of z-statistic is -6.0124

Critical Value:

At α = 0.01 and df = N1 + N2 - 2 = 163, the critical value is -2.346. We reject the null hypothesis if the calculated value is less than the critical value.

Now, let's calculate the value of the z-statistic.

z = (X1 - X2) / [√(s12/N1 + s22/N2)] = (7.25 - 7.48) / [√((0.004)2/120 + (0.003)2/45)] = -13.8854

As the calculated value (-13.8854) is less than the critical value (-2.346), we reject the null hypothesis.

Hence, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the pH value of the natural spring water made by the company is lower than the competing company.

Therefore, at 1% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to support this claim.

To know more about the Hypothesis Test, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ11

The cutoff score for determining higher reading proficiency would be 76 (national mean score) as the cutoff point. Any score above 76 can be considered higher than the national norm.

To determine whether the reading proficiency of high school seniors in your city is higher than the national norm, we can conduct a hypothesis test using the given information. Here are the steps to follow:

State the hypotheses:

The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that the reading proficiency of high school seniors in your city is not higher than the national norm.

The alternative hypothesis (H1) assumes that the reading proficiency of high school seniors in your city is higher than the national norm.

H0: μ ≤ 76 (population mean reading score is less than or equal to the national mean)

H1: μ > 76 (population mean reading score is greater than the national mean)

Determine the significance level:

The significance level (α) is given as 5%, which means we can reject the null hypothesis if the probability of observing the given data is less than 5%.

Calculate the z-score:

To compare the sample reading score of 78 with the national norm, we need to calculate the z-score using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Where:

x = Sample mean (78)

μ = Population mean (76)

σ = Population standard deviation (1.2)

Substituting the values into the formula:

z = (78 - 76) / 1.2

z = 2 / 1.2

z = 1.67

Find the critical value:

Since our alternative hypothesis is one-tailed (μ > 76), we need to find the critical value from the z-table corresponding to a 5% significance level in the right tail.

Looking up the z-table, we find that the critical z-value for a 5% significance level is approximately 1.645.

Compare the z-score with the critical value:

If the calculated z-score is greater than the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we fail to reject it.

In this case, the calculated z-score is 1.67, which is greater than the critical value of 1.645.

Make a decision:

Since the calculated z-score is greater than the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusion:

Based on the sample reading score of 78 and the given information, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the reading proficiency of high school seniors in your city is higher than the national norm at a 5% significance level.

In summary, the cutoff score for determining higher reading proficiency would be 76 (national mean score) as the cutoff point. Any score above 76 can be considered higher than the national norm.

for such more question on cutoff score

https://brainly.com/question/15222372

#SPJ11

The required percentage of 6th graders who don’t have a pet is 83%.

Given, Pets Survey Pets No Pets296th grade23,7th grade23,8th grade25

We have to find the percentage of the 6th graders who don't have a pet.

Step 1: Let the total number of students in 6th grade be ‘x’.

So, the number of students in 6th grade who have pets = 23

and the number of students in 6th grade who don’t have pets will be x − 23 (as the total number of students in 6th grade = number of students who have pets + number of students who don't have pets)

x − 23 = Number of 6th graders who don’t have pets x = Number of 6th graders who don’t have pets + 23

Now, the total number of students (having pets and not having pets) in 6th grade = x + 23= Number of 6th graders

who don’t have pets + 23 + 23= Number of 6th graders

who don’t have pets + 46

So, Number of 6th graders who don’t have pets = x − 23= Number of 6th graders

who don’t have pets + 46 − 23= x + 23 − 23= x

Percent of 6th graders who don’t have a pet= number of 6th graders

who don’t have a pet/total number of students in 6th grade×100= x/x+23×100

Since, the value of x is not given, we cannot determine the exact percentage.

We can only calculate the percentage by taking x = 1,2,3,…so on (because x is a positive integer)

Now, if x = 1,Number of 6th graders who don’t have pets = 1+23=24Percent of 6th graders

who don’t have a pet= number of 6th graders

who don’t have a pet/total number of students in 6th grade×100=24/29×100=82.75862068≈83% (rounded to the nearest whole number percent)=83%

Note: Since, the value of x can be any positive integer, the percentage of 6th graders who don’t have a pet can be any value from 0% to 100%.

To know more about percentage visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32197511

#SPJ11

Given that, Averi paid $59.88 for 6 months of her premium online music account. The equation for the given information can be written as;6x = 59.88. Hence, Averi pays $9.98 each month for her music account.

We have given that Averi paid $59.88 for 6 months of her premium online music account. Let x represent the cost Averi pays each month.The total cost paid by Averi in 6 months = $59.88And, the cost paid each month = x. Therefore, we can write the given information in terms of an equation as;6x = 59.88By solving the above equation, we can get the value of x.x = 59.88/6 = $9.98Therefore, Averi pays $9.98 each month for her music account.Hence, the correct option is (C) $9.98.

It can be concluded that Averi pays $9.98 each month for her premium online music account by solving the given equation 6x = 59.88.

To know more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/10724260

#SPJ11

The probability of not drawing a blue marble is 0.51, which can also be expressed as 51/100 or 51%.

To find the probability of not drawing a blue marble (P(no blue)), we need to consider the outcomes where blue marbles are not drawn.

From the given table, we can see that the outcomes are categorized as Red, Red; Red, Blue; Blue, Blue; and Blue, Red.

The outcomes "Red, Red" and "Red, Blue" are the ones where blue marbles are not drawn, as the first marble drawn is red in both cases.

The frequency of the outcome "Red, Red" is 19, and the frequency of the outcome "Red, Blue" is 32.

Adding these frequencies together gives us 19 + 32 = 51.

Since the experiment involves drawing marbles twice and replacing them, the total number of outcomes is 100.

Therefore, the probability of not drawing a blue marble (P(no blue)) can be calculated as the frequency of the desired outcomes (51) divided by the total number of outcomes (100):

P(no blue) = 51/100

Simplifying this fraction, we get:

P(no blue) = 0.51.

So, the probability of not drawing a blue marble is 0.51, which can also be expressed as 51/100 or 51%.

In conclusion, based on the given data, the probability of not drawing a blue marble in the experiment is 0.51 or 51%.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/7965468  

#SPJ11

If 8% of all drivers were involved in a car accident last year and 20 drivers are randomly selected, the probability that exactly 2 were involved in a car accident is 0.2368.

A car insurance company has determined that 8% of all drivers were involved in a car accident last year. If 20 drivers are randomly selected, we need to find the probability that exactly 2 were involved in a car accident.

P(A driver was involved in a car accident last year) = 8% = 0.08

Let X be the number of drivers who were involved in a car accident.

X follows the binomial distribution with parameters n = 20 and p = 0.08.

The probability of exactly 2 drivers being involved in a car accident is given by:

P(X = 2) = (20C2) * (0.08)^2 * (0.92)^18

where 20C2 is the number of ways of selecting 2 drivers out of 20.

The combination is given by:

20C2 = (20!)/[(20-2)! * 2!] = (20*19)/(2*1) = 190

So,P(X = 2) = (20C2) * (0.08)^2 * (0.92)^18 = 190 * (0.08)^2 * (0.92)^18= 0.2368

Hence, the probability that exactly 2 drivers were involved in a car accident is 0.2368.

Learn more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11