Social media advertising is becoming an increasingly important tool for businesses to reach their target audience and increase brand awareness.
The article "Social Media Advertising in 2023: Costs, Types, Tips & Top Channels" discusses the importance of social media advertising in 2023 and provides insights into its types, costs, tips, and top channels. The article highlights the shift in the advertising industry towards social media platforms as a way to reach potential customers. The key takeaway is that social media advertising provides an excellent opportunity for businesses to reach their target audience, increase brand awareness and customer engagement.
The video further emphasizes the importance of social media advertising by highlighting its cost-effectiveness and high return on investment. It explains that social media advertising enables businesses to reach a large number of potential customers with a limited budget. The video also emphasizes the importance of creating engaging content that resonates with the target audience, as this will increase customer engagement and drive sales.
The concepts in the article and video are closely related to those in the textbook. The textbook emphasizes the importance of understanding the target audience, developing a clear message, and selecting the right advertising medium to reach the target audience. The article and video both highlight the importance of creating engaging content that resonates with the target audience to drive customer engagement and sales.
To know more about social media, here
brainly.com/question/29853945
#SPJ1
is a document that contains questions or blank spaces where the appilicant provides information
A job application is a document that contains questions or blank spaces where the applicant provides information.
Job application is used to choose the ideal applicant for a certain position inside the organization. The majority of businesses offer these forms upon asking for them, at which time it is the applicant's obligation to fill it out and submit it to the firm for review.
Credentials for a job are highlighted, including education, experience, abilities, and other pertinent data. Employers evaluate resumes to identify possible interviewees for certain jobs.
Learn more about the Job application, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30576240
#SPJ1
Evelyn Vollmer orally agreed to loan Danny Lang $150,000 to make an investment in a local nightclub. The loan was to be repaid from the profits received from the investment. Their agreement was never memorialized in writing, however. Eighteen months later, Lang had paid only $15,000 on the loan from the profits from the business. Vollmer filed a lawsuit alleging breach of contract. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.
Lang claimed that repayment of the loan would “almost certainly” take over a year and that his agreement with Vollmer was therefore unenforceable because it was not in writing. Is he correct? Explain.
Suppose that a week after Vollmer gave Lang the funds, she sent him an e-mail containing the terms of their loan agreement with her named typed at the bottom. Lang did not respond to the e-mail. Is this sufficient as a writing under the Statute of Frauds?
Assume that at trial the court finds that the contract falls within the Statute of Frauds. Further assume that the state in which the court sits recognizes every exception to the Statute of Frauds discussed in the chapter. What exception provides Vollmer with the best chance of enforcing the oral contract in this situation?
Suppose that at trial, Lang never raises the argument that the parties’ agreement violates the Statute of Frauds, and the court rules in favor of Vollmer. Then Lang appeals and raises the Statute of Frauds for the first time. What exception can Vollmer now argue?
Lang's claim that repayment of the loan would take over a year and therefore the agreement is unenforceable because it was not in writing is incorrect.
Answers to the aforementioned questions1. Lang's claim that repayment of the loan would take over a year and therefore the agreement is unenforceable because it was not in writing is incorrect.
The requirement for a written agreement under the Statute of Frauds varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but typically contracts that cannot be performed within one year are required to be in writing. In t
2. An e-mail containing the terms of the loan agreement, even with Vollmer's name at the bottom, may not be sufficient as a writing under the Statute of Frauds in some jurisdictions.
The requirements for a writing can vary, but generally, a writing must be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Since Lang did not respond to the e-mail and did not provide his own signature, it may not satisfy the writing requirement under the Statute of Frauds.
3. Assuming the contract falls within the Statute of Frauds and the state recognizes exceptions to the Statute of Frauds, the best chance for Vollmer to enforce the oral contract would be the partial performance exception.
The partial performance exception allows for the enforcement of an oral contract if one party has already partially performed their obligations under the contract.
4. If Lang raises the Statute of Frauds for the first time on appeal, Vollmer can argue the doctrine of promissory estoppel as an exception. Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a party from using the Statute of Frauds as a defense if the other party has relied on the oral agreement to their detriment.
Learn more about trial at https://brainly.com/question/30128460
#SPJ1
If I have bought 4 books and 2 pens plus tax each (you have to add the tax for each book and pen): $12.99, $12.99, $11.99, $7.99, $3.99, and $5.99. I gave them $60.00. The cashier gave me 32 cents back. Did the cashier give me the right amount of change back?
Answer:
To determine if the cashier gave you the correct amount of change back, we need to calculate the total cost of the books and pens, including tax, and compare it to the amount you paid.
The cost of the books with tax is:
$12.99 + $12.99 + $11.99 + $7.99 = $45.96
The cost of the pens with tax is:
$3.99 + $5.99 = $9.98
The total cost of the books and pens with tax is:
$45.96 + $9.98 = $55.94
You gave the cashier $60.00, and the cashier gave you 32 cents back.
So the amount you received back from the cashier is:
$60.00 - $55.94 = $4.06
The correct change you should have received is $4.06. Since the cashier gave you 32 cents back, it appears that the cashier did not give you the correct amount of change. You should have received $4.06 instead of 32 cents.
Therefore, it seems that the cashier made an error and did not give you the right amount of change back.
