The decay equation is: N(t) = [tex]N0 * (1/2)^(t/T),[/tex] where N0 is the initial amount, T is the half-life, and t is time.
How to find the milligrams are remaining after 45 hoursFor 45 hours, t = 45/24 = 1.875 days.
Plug values into the equation:
N(1.875) = [tex]100 * (1/2)^(1.875/0.625)[/tex]
= [tex]100 * (1/2)^3[/tex] = 12.5 milligrams.
To find when there are 5 milligrams left,
5 = [tex]100 * (1/2)^(t/0.625).[/tex]
Solving for t: t = 0.625 * log2(100/5)
= 0.625 * 4.322 = 2.70 days.
Read more about half-life here:
https://brainly.com/question/2320811
#SPJ1
If your research gives you a statistic that 70% of Americans are health conscious, then compare that to the amount of money spent each year on fast
food in America, you will probably find a conflict in those numbers. This would be evidence that your study lacked_validity.
If a research study indicates that 70% of Americans are health conscious, but when compared to the amount of money spent on fast food in America, a conflict arises, it would suggest a lack of validity in the study.
Validity refers to the extent to which a study accurately measures or reflects the concept it claims to be studying.
In this case, the conflict arises because the high percentage of health-conscious individuals does not align with the substantial amount of money spent on fast food.
If the study had strong validity, we would expect to see a correlation between health consciousness and a corresponding decrease in fast food consumption or expenditure. However, the evidence suggests otherwise.
The lack of validity may be due to various reasons such as flawed data collection methods, biased sampling techniques, or inaccurate survey questions.
It is essential to critically evaluate the study's methodology and data to identify any potential sources of error or bias that could have contributed to the conflict between the reported health consciousness percentage and the expenditure on fast food.
For more questions on validity, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28566014
#SPJ8
provide one specific example of when you might incorporate a source in your writing for work or school. Then in 2-3 sentences explain the value of incorporating sources into your writing
Incorporating sources into your writing adds value by enhancing the quality and reliability of your work.
One specific example of when you might incorporate a source in your writing for work or school is when you are writing a research paper on a specific topic. In this case, you would include sources such as academic journals, books, or reputable websites to support your arguments, provide evidence, and give credibility to your work.
Incorporating sources into your writing adds value by enhancing the quality and reliability of your work. It demonstrates that you have conducted thorough research, considered different perspectives, and built your arguments on a foundation of existing knowledge. By citing credible sources, you also acknowledge the contributions of others and give readers the opportunity to explore the topic further.
Learn more about Incorporating sources here:
https://brainly.com/question/30925460
#SPJ2
What does a record tell you about a source?
Technician A says that one function of a damage report is to help prevent misunderstandings between the repairer and customer.
Technician B says that one function of a damage report is to document authorization to repair the vehicle.
Who is right?
Answer: both a and b
Explanation: