Solve using elimination

The expansion of expression (x² + 4)¹⁰ is x²⁰+40x¹⁸+720x¹⁶+7680x¹⁴+53760x¹²+258048x¹⁰+860160x⁸+1966080x⁶+2949120x⁴.

To expand the binomial (x² + 4)¹⁰, we can use the binomial theorem.

According to the binomial theorem, the expansion of (x + y)ⁿ can be written as:

(x + y)ⁿ = C(n, 0) × xⁿ × y⁰ + C(n, 1) × xⁿ⁻¹×y¹ + C(n, 2) × xⁿ⁻² ×y² + ... + C(n, n-1) * x¹×yⁿ⁻¹ + C(n, n)×x⁰× yⁿ

x = x² and y = 4, and n = 10.

Expanding (x² + 4)¹⁰ using the binomial theorem:

= C(10, 0) × (x²)¹⁰ × 4⁰ + C(10, 1) × (x²)⁹ × 4¹ + C(10, 2) × (x²)⁸ × 4² + ... + C(10, 9) × (x²)¹×4⁹ + C(10, 10)×(x²)⁰ × 4¹⁰

=x²⁰+40x¹⁸+720x¹⁶+7680x¹⁴+53760x¹²+258048x¹⁰+860160x⁸+1966080x⁶+2949120x⁴.

To learn more on Binomial Theorem click:

https://brainly.com/question/30095070

#SPJ4

Rounded to the nearest tenth, the volume of the cone is approximately 4712.4 cubic meters.

To find the volume of a cone, we can use the formula:

V = (1/3)πr^2h

Where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height (or slant height in this case).

Given:

Slant height (l) = 25 meters

Radius (r) = 15 meters

We need to find the height (h) of the cone. Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find the height:

h = √(l^2 - r^2)

= √(25^2 - 15^2)

= √(625 - 225)

= √400

= 20 meters

Now we can calculate the volume using the formula:

V = (1/3)πr^2h

= (1/3)π(15^2)(20)

= (1/3)π(225)(20)

= (1/3)(225π)(20)

≈ 4712.4 cubic meters

Rounded to the nearest tenth, the volume of the cone is approximately 4712.4 cubic meters.

Learn more about  volume  from

https://brainly.com/question/27710307

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Y = mx + b   is a line equation in slope intercdept form    slope = m

y = 3x-1 has slope m = 3   <====  Parallel slope is also '3'

then using the pont slope form of a line :

(y-5) = 3 (x-1)     is the new line

  re-arrange to   y = 3x +2

The answer is:

y = 3x + 2

Work/explanation:

If two lines are parallel to each other, their slopes are equal.

Consider the given equation, y = 3x - 1. Its slope is 3. Hence, the slope of the line that is parallel to y = 3x - 1 is 3.

So far, the equation is y = 3x + b.

Now, there are two ways we could find b. We could use point slope, and simplify to slope intercept, or, we could plug the point directly into the equation y = 3x + b, and solve for b. Allow me to demonstrate both ways.

[tex]\rule{350}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]\frak{Method~1-Point~slope~form}[/tex]

The equation is [tex]\sf{y-y_1=m(x-x_1)}[/tex], where m = slope and (x₁,y₁) is a point on the line.

Plug in the data

[tex]\sf{y-5=3(x-1)}[/tex]

Simplify

[tex]\sf{y-5=3x-3}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{y=5x-3+5}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{y=3x+2}[/tex]

Hence, the equation is y = 3x + 2. Now I will use the second method, and see if I obtain the same answer!

[tex]\rule{350}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\frak{Method~two-Slope~intercept~\mid~~Plugging~the~point~into~the~equation}[/tex]

Plug the point (1,5) directly into the equation y = 3x + b; plug in 1 for x, and 5 for y.

[tex]\sf{5=3(1)+b}[/tex]

Simplify

[tex]\sf{5=3+b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{5-3=b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{2=b}[/tex]

Hence, the y intercept is 2; and the equation is y = 3x + 2.

As you can see, I have used two different ways, and I have arrived at the same answer.

The correct answer is: None of these answers is correct.The random variable representing the time lapsed during the run in this experiment is a continuous random variable.

I apologize for the previous incorrect answer. The random variable representing the time lapsed during the run in the given experiment is a continuous random variable. A continuous random variable can take on any value within a specified range or interval. In this case, the time elapsed during the run can theoretically be any non-negative real number, allowing for an infinite number of possible outcomes. It is not restricted to specific discrete values or intervals. Examples of continuous random variables include time, length, weight, and temperature.

Continuous random variables are characterized by their probability density function (PDF), which describes the likelihood of observing different values. In contrast, a discrete random variable would have a finite or countable set of possible values, such as the number of heads obtained in a series of coin flips.

To learn more about number, click here:

brainly.com/question/29130992

#SPJ11

To find the profit function, maximum profit quantity, and maximum profit for a firm with revenue[tex]R(q) = 15q - 0.5q^2[/tex] and cost [tex]C(q) = q^3 - 13.5q^2\\[/tex] + 50q + 40, we first subtract the cost from the revenue to obtain the profit function [tex]\prod(q) = R(q) - C(q)[/tex]. Then, we can determine the quantity where the profit is maximized by using the second derivative test. Finally, we can calculate the maximum profit by substituting the quantity found in part (b) into the profit function [tex]\prod(q)[/tex].

a. The profit function [tex]\prod(q)[/tex] is obtained by subtracting the cost function C(q) from the revenue function R(q). Therefore, [tex]\prod(q) = R(q) - C(q)[/tex] =[tex](15q - 0.5q^2) - (q^3 - 13.5q^2 + 50q + 40[/tex]). Simplifying this expression gives [tex]\prod(q)[/tex] = [tex]-q^3 + 14q^2 - 35q - 40[/tex].

b. To determine the quantity where the profit is maximized, we can use the second derivative test. The second derivative of the profit function [tex]\prod(q)[/tex] is obtained by differentiating [tex]\prod(q)[/tex] with respect to q twice. Taking the second derivative of [tex]\prod(q)[/tex], we get [tex]\prod''(q) = -6q + 28[/tex]. To find the quantity where the profit is maximized, we set [tex]\prod''(q)[/tex] equal to zero and solve for q: -6q + 28 = 0. Solving this equation gives q = 28/6 = 14/3.

c. Once we have found the quantity q = 14/3, we can substitute this value into the profit function Π(q) to find the maximum profit. Plugging q = 14/3 into [tex]\prod(q)[/tex], we have [tex]\prod(14/3) = -(14/3)^3 + 14(14/3)^2 - 35(14/3) - 40[/tex]. Evaluating this expression gives the maximum profit value.

[tex]\prod(14/3) = -((14/3)^3) + 14((14/3)^2) - 35(14/3) - 40.[/tex]

Simplifying this expression gives:

[tex]\prod(14/3) = -2744/27 + 2744/9 - 490/3 - 40.[/tex]

Combining the terms and finding a common denominator:

[tex]\prod(14/3) = (-2744 + 8192 - 4410 - 1080)/27.[/tex]

Further simplification:

[tex]\prod(14/3) = 958/27.[/tex]

Therefore, the maximum profit at the quantity q = 14/3 is 958/27.

Learn more about second derivative test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30404403

#SPJ11

Note that the length of PD is 7.5. See the solution below.

Since AD ⇒ y = mx + c ⇒ y = -2x+6

and m = slope or gradient and c is intercept, hence,

We can submit that the x value of point D is 0 and the intercept of course is 6.

Next we look for the coordinates of point A.

Since the above shape is on a coordinate plane, we can submit that

the y value of point A is 0.

If y = -2x =6 and the y value of point A is 0, then

0 = -2x +6
2x = 6

x = 3

Hence point A coordinates is (3,0)

Next, we know that line PAB is perpendicular to line AD.

This means that their gradient are related.

Gradient for AD x Gradient for PAB = -1

that is
-2 x GPAB = -1

GPAB = 1/2

that is the gradient of line PAB = 1/2

Ths, the equation for line PAB is y = 1/2x + c

So solving for C we say

y = 1/2x + c

Recall that the x value for coordinate of A is 3 and it's y value is 0

So

y = 1/2(3) + C

0 = 1/2(3) + C

0 = 1.5 + c
C = -1.5


So since the x value for P is 0 and intercept y) is -1.5 we can derive the lenght of PD.

Recall that y value of point D is 6 and that of point P is -1.5 thus,

Length of PD = 1.5 + 6 = 7.5

Learn more about length:
https://brainly.com/question/28108430
#SPJ1

A differentiable function h(x) with specific conditions will have points where h(d) = d, h'(c) = 1/3, and h'(x) = 1/4.

(a) By the Intermediate Value Theorem, as h(x) is continuous, there exists a point d in the interval (0,3) where h(d) equals d, since h(0) = 1 and h(3) = 2.

(b) Using the Mean Value Theorem, as h(x) is differentiable, there exists a point c in (0,3) where h'(c) equals the average rate of change between h(0) and h(3), which is 1/3.

(c) By applying Rolle's theorem repeatedly, we can show that there exists a point in the domain of h(x) where the nth derivative of h(x) is zero.

Consequently, at that point, h'(x) is constant, and since h'(0) = h'(3), we can conclude that h'(x) equals 1/4 at some point in the domain.

Learn more about Function click here :brainly.com/question/572693

#SPJ11

Question -  Exercise 5.3.3. Let h be a differentiable function defined on the interval (0,3), and assume that h(0) = 1, h(1) = 2, and h(3) = 2. (a) Argue that there exists a point de [0,3] where h(d) = d. (b) Argue that at some point c we have h'(c) = 1/3. (c) Argue that h'(x) = 1/4 at some point in the domain.

The ordinary least squares (OLS) method of estimation obtains the estimates of slope and intercept by finding the least value (s) of the sum of squared residuals.

In the OLS method, the goal is to find the line that best fits a given set of data points. The sum of squared residuals represents the difference between the observed values and the values predicted by the line. The OLS method aims to minimize this sum of squared residuals by adjusting the values of slope and intercept.

By minimizing the sum of squared residuals, the OLS method finds the line that provides the best fit to the data, making it the "least squares" line. This line minimizes the overall distance between the observed data points and the predicted values on the line.

The estimation process involves finding the values of slope and intercept that minimize the sum of squared residuals. This is typically done using mathematical optimization techniques such as calculus, where the derivatives of the sum of squared residuals with respect to the slope and intercept are set to zero to find the optimal values.

To learn more about ordinary least squares

brainly.com/question/30548812

#SPJ11

a) Converting the problem to LP:

minimize c^T * x

subject to:

A * x ≤ b

x1 + x2 + x3 ≤ -1

-x1 - x2 - x3 ≤ -1

x1, x2, x3 ≤ 2

where c^T = [1, 1, 1] is the objective coefficient vector,

A = [1, -1, 2; -1, -1, -2] is the constraint matrix, and

b = [-1, -1] is the constraint vector.

b) Finding an optimal solution using CVX:

Implementation using CVX in MATLAB:

cvx_begin

   variable x(3)

   minimize(norm(x, 2))

   subject to

       x(1) - x(2) + 2*x(3) + sum(abs(x)) <= -1

       x <= 2

cvx_end

This code sets up the objective function, the constraint, and the variable x using CVX syntax. It then solves the optimization problem and obtains the optimal solution for x.

To convert the given problem to a linear programming (LP) problem, we first need to rewrite the objective function and constraints in a linear form. The objective function is already in a linear form, as it involves the norm of the variable x. The constraint (1) involves the norm (L1 norm) of x, which can be rewritten as a set of linear inequalities. We can rewrite ||x||1 ≤ −1 as x1 + x2 + x3 ≤ -1 and -x1 - x2 - x3 ≤ -1.

CVX is a modeling system for convex optimization problems. It allows us to express the optimization problem in a natural mathematical form and solves it using appropriate algorithms. To find an optimal solution using CVX, you can write the problem in CVX syntax and solve it using the appropriate solver.

Note: Since CVX is a specific software package, providing the detailed solution code and its execution is beyond the scope of a text-based response. However, by using CVX and following its documentation and guidelines, you can solve the problem and obtain the optimal solution for the given LP formulation.

Learn more about MATLAB here:

https://brainly.com/question/30641998

#SPJ11

To prove that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DCB, we can use the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) postulate.

The ASA postulate states that if two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.

In this case, we are given that angle ABC is congruent to angle DCB. This is one angle that is shared by both triangles.

Next, we need to identify another angle that is congruent between the two triangles. Looking at the given information, we can observe that angle B is common to both triangles ABC and DCB. Therefore, angle B is congruent to itself.

Lastly, we need to identify the included side, which is the side that is between the two given angles. In this case, side BC is the included side.

Thus, we have shown that angle ABC is congruent to angle DCB, angle B is congruent to angle B, and side BC is shared by both triangles.

By fulfilling the conditions of the ASA postulate (two congruent angles and the included side), we can conclude that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DCB.

Therefore, the ASA postulate can be used to prove that ABC = DCB, demonstrating the congruence between the two triangles based on the given information.

For more such questions on congruent

https://brainly.com/question/1675117

#SPJ8

The determinant of the given matrix is 20.

Given is a 3x3 order matrix [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 5\\3 & 1 & 0\\1 & 2 & 1\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

We need to find the determinant of the matrix,

To evaluate the determinant of the given matrix, we'll use the formula for a 3x3 matrix:

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a & b & c\\d & e & f\\g & h & i\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

The determinant of this matrix is given by the expression:

det = a(ei - fh) - b(di - fg) + c(dh - eg)

Here,

a = 1, b = 2, c = 5,

d = 3, e = 1, f = 0,

g = 1, h = 2, i = 1

Using the formula, we can substitute the values and calculate the determinant:

det = 1(1·1 - 2·0) - 2(3·1 - 0·1) + 5(3·2 - 1·1)

det = 1(1-0) - 2(3-0) + 5(6-1)

detr = 1 - 6 + 25                                          

det = -5 + 25

det = 20

Hence the determinant of the given matrix is 20.

Learn more about Matrix, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ4

Kirk Van Houten would need to earn an annual rate of return of approximately 6.63% on his investment to purchase the $10,500 diamond ring with a platinum setting for his 30-year wedding anniversary.

To calculate the annual rate of return Kirk needs to earn on his investment, we can use the formula for compound interest:

Future Value = Present Value * [tex](1 + Rate)^{Time}[/tex]

In this case, the Present Value is $4,576, and the Future Value (cost of the ring) is $10,500. Kirk wants to accumulate this amount over a period of 7 years (30 years of marriage minus 23 years already passed). Rearranging the formula to solve for the Rate, we have:

Rate = [tex](Future Value / Present Value)^{(1/Time)}[/tex] - 1

Plugging in the values, we get:

Rate =[tex]($10,500 / $4,576)^{(1/7)}[/tex] - 1

    = 1.2894 - 1

    ≈ 0.2894

So Kirk would need to earn a rate of approximately 0.2894 or 28.94% annually to accumulate enough money. However, this is a high rate of return, and it might be challenging to achieve consistently. If Kirk invests in less risky options like bonds or savings accounts, he might not be able to reach the required return. It would be advisable for Kirk to explore different investment options and consult a financial advisor to determine a realistic investment strategy that aligns with his financial goals and risk tolerance.

Learn more investment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29132934

#SPJ11

The solutions of the equation x² - 4 = 0 are x = -2 and x = 2. We can solve the equation by taking the square root of both sides. We have:

x² - 4 = 0

=> x² = 4

=> x = ±√4

This means that x is equal to either the positive or negative square root of 4. The positive square root of 4 is 2, and the negative square root of 4 is -2. Therefore, the solutions of the equation are x = -2 and x = 2.

To check our solutions, we can substitute them back into the original equation. We have:

x² - 4 = 0

=> (-2)² - 4 = 0

=> 4 - 4 = 0

=> 0 = 0

x² - 4 = 0

=> (2)² - 4 = 0

=> 4 - 4 = 0

=> 0 = 0

As we can see, both solutions satisfy the original equation.

To learn more about equation click here : brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

No, it is not possible for more than one value to complete the square for an expression. Completing the square results in a unique value and form for the expression.


Completing the square is a process used to rewrite a quadratic expression in the form of a perfect square trinomial. This process involves adding a constant term to the expression in such a way that it can be factored into a perfect square. The constant term is determined by taking half of the coefficient of the linear term and squaring it. This ensures that the quadratic expression can be factored into a squared binomial.

Since the constant term and the linear term in the expression are fixed values, there can only be one unique value that completes the square. Adding any other value would result in a different quadratic expression that does not satisfy the conditions of a perfect square trinomial. Therefore, completing the square for an expression results in a single, unique value and form.

Learn more about Squares here: brainly.com/question/14198272
#SPJ11

Answer:

|-10x| < 50

10|x| < 50

|x| < 5

-5 < x < 5

The opportunity cost of cheese in the home country is 2 gallons of wine per pound of cheese, while in the foreign country, it is 0.5 pounds of cheese per gallon of wine.

The opportunity cost of a good represents the value of the next best alternative that must be given up producing or consume that good. In the home country, producing 1 pound of cheese requires giving up the opportunity to produce 2 gallons of wine. Therefore, the opportunity cost of cheese in the home country is 2 gallons of wine per pound of cheese. In the foreign country, producing 1 gallon of wine requires giving up the opportunity to produce 0.5 pounds of cheese. Hence, the opportunity cost of cheese in the foreign country is 0.5 pounds of cheese per gallon of wine.

To construct the world relative supply (RS) curve, we need to compare the relative labor requirements of cheese and wine production between the home and foreign countries. The relative labor requirement is obtained by dividing the labor requirement for one good by the labor requirement for the other good. In this case, we divide the unit labor requirements of cheese by the unit labor requirements of wine. For the home country, the relative labor requirement is 1 hour of cheese per 2 hours of wine, and for the foreign country, it is 2 hours of cheese per 1 hour of wine.

The world relative supply (RS) curve shows the combinations of cheese and wine that can be produced globally given the available labor supply in both countries. It is derived by combining the relative labor requirements of the two countries. By plotting different combinations of cheese and wine production on the RS curve, we can observe the trade-off between the two goods and the potential gains from trade.

Learn more about combinations here: brainly.com/question/29595163

#SPJ11

The percentage of students at Jefferson College who have both a cell phone and a computer is 56%.

To find the percentage of students who have both a cell phone and a computer, we need to calculate the intersection of the two events. We start with the percentage of students who have cell phones, which is 80%.

Then, we multiply this percentage by the percentage of students who have computers, which is 70%. This gives us the percentage of students who have both.

Percentage of students with both a cell phone and a computer = 80% * 70% = 56%

Therefore, 56% of the students at Jefferson College have both a cell phone and a computer.

Learn more about percentages here:

https://brainly.com/question/31585260

#SPJ4

The value of n is 14  so that the line perpendicular to the line -2y + 4 = 6x + 8 passes through the points (n, -4) and (2, -8)

We need to determine the slope of the given line and then calculate the negative reciprocal of that slope. The negative reciprocal slope will be the slope of the perpendicular line. By using the slope-intercept form of a linear equation, we can find the equation of the perpendicular line and solve for the value of n.

We need to find the slope of the given line, find its negative reciprocal to get the slope of the perpendicular line, and then use the slope-intercept form to write the equation of the perpendicular line. From there, we can solve for the value of n by substituting the given coordinates.

The given line has the equation -2y + 4 = 6x + 8. We need to rewrite it in slope-intercept form (y = mx + b) to determine its slope.

Starting with the given equation:

-2y + 4 = 6x + 8

First, subtract 4 from both sides:

-2y = 6x + 4

Next, divide the entire equation by -2 to isolate y:

y = -3x - 2

The slope of the given line is -3. The negative reciprocal of -3 is 1/3, which represents the slope of the perpendicular line.

Using the point-slope form (y - y1 = m(x - x1)) and substituting the coordinates of (2, -8), we can write the equation of the perpendicular line as:

y - (-8) = (1/3)(x - 2)

Simplifying, we have:

y + 8 = (1/3)x - 2/3

To find the value of n, we substitute the y-coordinate of the other given point (-4) and solve for x:

-4 + 8 = (1/3)n - 2/3

4 = (1/3)n - 2/3

Adding 2/3 to both sides:

4 + 2/3 = (1/3)n

Now, we can simplify the equation and solve for n:

(12/3) + (2/3) = (1/3)n

14/3 = (1/3)n

Multiplying both sides by 3:

14 = n

Therefore, the value of n is 14.

Learn more about determine here

brainly.com/question/30795016

#SPJ11

The  cotθ can be expressed in terms of sinθ as cotθ = cosθ/sinθ.To express cotθ in terms of sinθ, we can use the reciprocal identities and the Pythagorean identity.

The reciprocal identity for cotangent is:

cotθ = 1/tanθ

The tangent function can be expressed in terms of sine and cosine as:

tanθ = sinθ/cosθ

Now, substituting this expression into the reciprocal identity, we get:

cotθ = 1/(sinθ/cosθ)

To simplify further, we can multiply the numerator and denominator by cosθ:

cotθ = cosθ/sinθ

Therefore, cotθ can be expressed in terms of sinθ as cotθ = cosθ/sinθ.

To learn more about function click here:

brainly.com/question/33656424

#SPJ11

The compound amount for a deposit of $9,000 at an interest rate of 5.43% compounded continuously for 2 years is approximately $10,118.10. The interest earned on this deposit is approximately $1,118.10.

In continuous compounding, the formula for the compound amount is given by A = P * e^(rt), where A is the compound amount, P is the principal amount, e is Euler's number (approximately 2.71828), r is the interest rate, and t is the time in years.

Plugging in the given values, we have A = 9000 * e^(0.0543*2). Evaluating this expression, we find that A is approximately $10,118.10.

To calculate the interest earned, we subtract the principal amount from the compound amount: Interest = A - P = $10,118.10 - $9,000 = $1,118.10. Therefore, the amount of interest earned on this deposit is approximately $1,118.10.

In summary, the compound amount for a deposit of $9,000 at 5.43% compounded continuously for 2 years is approximately $10,118.10. The interest earned on this deposit is approximately $1,118.10.

Learn more about interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/30955042

#SPJ11

To determine the correct symbol to fill in the blank and make a true statement, we need to compare the sizes of the two measurements: 1/4 inch and -1/2 inch.

When comparing two fractions, a helpful approach is to convert them to a common denominator. In this case, the common denominator for 1/4 and -1/2 is 4.  1/4 can be written as 1/4 and -1/2 can be written as -2/4 when both are expressed with a common denominator.

Now we can compare the fractions:

1/4 is greater than -2/4 since it is positive and closer to zero.

Therefore, we can fill in the blank with the symbol ">" to make the statement true:

1/4 in. > -1/2 in.

Learn more about fractions here: brainly.com/question/33315805

#SPJ11

Since the polynomial P(x) has rational coefficients, any additional roots must be found in conjugate pairs.  The given roots are 5+√3 and -√2. To find the additional roots, we take the conjugate of each root.

The conjugate of 5+√3 is 5-√3, and the conjugate of -√2 is √2. Therefore, the additional roots of P(x) are 5-√3 and √2. The polynomial P(x) can be factored as

[tex](x - (5+√3))(x - (5-√3))(x - (-√2))(x - √2), or equivalently, (x - 5 - √3)(x - 5 + √3)(x + √2)(x - √2).[/tex]

Learn more about irrational root here: brainly.com/question/29146228

#SPJ11

The examples of the use of tessellations in architecture include origami, quilts, oriental carpets etc; in mosaics include mosaic tiles, walls, floors, etc; and in artwork includes honeycomb, fritillary etc.

Tessellations are patterns of one or more shapes that repeat which are aesthetically appealing. They are employed in art and architecture all around the world.

In architecture it provides multi-functionality to the surface as well as allows to create geometrical surfaces. In the above examples the main aspect is the shapes or patterns in the making of the product.

Mosaics are itself a decorative art technique. Tessellations helps the mosaics to create patterns by repeating geometric shapes for the creation of images. In artworks it is used for defining repeating  shapes or patterns in a plane or geometric surface.

This way tessellations are used in the examples of architecture, mosaic and artwork.

To know more about tessellations

brainly.com/question/30659675

#SPJ4

Given :

a) total amount of money she earns for assembling

b) total no. of toys assembled by Fiona by earning:

convert $459 into cents

divide the sum by the cost of a single toy

hence, she assembled 540 toys and earned $459 out of them.

c) no. of toys she must assemble to earn

convert the sum into cents

divide the sum by the cost of a single toy

hence, she must assemble 235 toys in order to earn $200

convert the sum into cents

divide the sum by the cost of a single toy

hence,she must assemble 729 toys in order to earn $620

a. The solution to the system of equations is x = 4 and y = 1.

b. The solution obtained using the inverse matrix is x = -16/7 and y = -11/7, which is equivalent to x = 4 and y = 1 as obtained earlier using the substitution method.

a. To solve the system of equations:

3x + 2y = 14 -----(1)

2x - 4y = 4 -----(2)

Let's use the multiplication/addition method to eliminate one variable. We'll multiply equation (1) by 2 and equation (2) by 3 to create opposite coefficients for the x variable.

Multiply equation (1) by 2:

2(3x + 2y) = 2(14)

6x + 4y = 28 -----(3)

Multiply equation (2) by 3:

3(2x - 4y) = 3(4)

6x - 12y = 12 -----(4)

Now, we can add equation (3) and equation (4) to eliminate the x variable:

(6x + 4y) + (6x - 12y) = 28 + 12

12x - 8y = 40 -----(5)

Next, let's solve equations (2) and (5) as a system of equations:

2x - 4y = 4 -----(2)

12x - 8y = 40 -----(5)

We can simplify equation (5) by dividing both sides by 4:

3x - 2y = 10 -----(6)

Now, we have the following system of equations:

2x - 4y = 4 -----(2)

3x - 2y = 10 -----(6)

To solve this system, we can use the multiplication/addition method again. Multiply equation (2) by 3 and equation (6) by 2 to create opposite coefficients for the y variable:

Multiply equation (2) by 3:

3(2x - 4y) = 3(4)

6x - 12y = 12 -----(7)

Multiply equation (6) by 2:

2(3x - 2y) = 2(10)

6x - 4y = 20 -----(8)

Adding equation (7) and equation (8), we can eliminate the y variable:

(6x - 12y) + (6x - 4y) = 12 + 20

12x - 16y = 32

Now, let's solve this equation for x:

12x - 16y = 32

12x = 16y + 32

x = (16y + 32)/12

x = (4y + 8)/3 -----(9)

Substitute the value of x from equation (9) into equation (6):

3((4y + 8)/3) - 2y = 10

4y + 8 - 2y = 10

2y + 8 = 10

2y = 10 - 8

2y = 2

y = 2/2

y = 1

Now, substitute the value of y into equation (9) to find x:

x = (4y + 8)/3

x = (4*1 + 8)/3

x = (4 + 8)/3

x = 12/3

x = 4

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is x = 4 and y = 1.

b. Let's represent the given system of equations in matrix form:

| 3 2 | | x | = | 14 |

| 2 -4 | * | y | = | 4 |

To solve the system using the inverse matrix, we'll multiply both sides of the equation by the inverse of the coefficient matrix.

The coefficient matrix is A = | 3 2 |

| 2 -4 |

The inverse of A is A^(-1) = | -2/14 -1/14 |

| -1/7 -3/14 |

Multiplying both sides by A^(-1), we get:

A^(-1) * A * | x | = A^(-1) * | 14 |

| y | | 4 |

Simplifying further:

| x | = | -2/14 -1/14 | * | 14 |

| y | | -1/7 -3/14 | | 4 |

Performing the matrix multiplication:

| x | = | -2/14*14 + (-1/14)*4 |

| y | | (-1/7)*14 + (-3/14)*4 |

Simplifying:

| x | = | -2 + (-1/14)*4 |

| y | | (-2/7)*14 + (-3/14)*4 |

Simplifying further:

| x | = | -2 - 4/14 |

| y | | -4/7 - 6/14 |

Calculating:

| x | = | -2 - 2/7 |

| y | | -8/7 - 3/7 |

| x | = | -16/7 |

| y | | -11/7 |

Therefore, the solution obtained using the inverse matrix is x = -16/7 and y = -11/7, which is equivalent to x = 4 and y = 1 as obtained earlier using the substitution method.

​for such more question on inverse matrix

https://brainly.com/question/15066392

#SPJ8

Question

For the following questions, use the system of equations (1 point each):

3x + 2y = 14

2x- 4y = 4

a. Solve the system of equations using either the substitution method or the multiplication/addition method.

b. Check your solution by writing the system as a matrix equation and using the inverse matrix.​Detailed human generated answer without plagiarism

The opportunity cost of knitting one more scarf can be determined by calculating the additional number of hats that could have been produced instead.The resulting number represents the foregone opportunity.

To calculate the opportunity cost of knitting one more scarf in terms of hats, we need to determine the number of hats that could have been produced instead. The concept of opportunity cost implies that by choosing to allocate resources to one activity, we forgo the potential benefits of an alternative activity.

Let's assume that the knitter's production plan allocates a certain number of resources to knitting scarves and hats. If the plan originally included a specific number of scarves and hats, we can calculate the opportunity cost by comparing the resulting production levels.

For example, if the knitter's plan initially included 10 scarves and 15 hats, and by knitting one more scarf, the production becomes 11 scarves and 15 hats, the opportunity cost of knitting that additional scarf would be 0.067, rounded to two decimal places. This means that by choosing to knit one more scarf, the knitter gives up the opportunity to produce approximately 0.067 hats.

It's important to note that the specific production plan and resource allocation will determine the exact opportunity cost in terms of hats. By considering the foregone alternative and calculating the difference in production levels, we can determine the opportunity cost of knitting one more scarf.

Learn more about rounded here:

https://brainly.com/question/11911457

#SPJ11

Assuming that the function f is one-to-one, the inverse function [tex]f^-^1(7)[/tex]gives us  [tex]f^-^1(7) = 6[/tex].

To find the inverse of a function, we can swap the roles of x and y and solve for y.

Given that[tex]f(6) = 7[/tex], it means that when [tex]x = 6, f(x) = 7[/tex].

So, we have [tex]f(6) = 7[/tex].

To find [tex]f^-^1(7)[/tex], we need to solve for the input value x that corresponds to an output value of 7.

Let's set y = 7 and solve for x:

[tex]f(x) = y\\f(x) = 7[/tex]

Now we can swap x and y:

[tex]x = f^-^1(y)\\x = f^-^1(7)[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]f^-^1(7) = 6[/tex]

Assuming that the function f is one-to-one, the inverse function [tex]f^-^1(7)[/tex]gives us the input value that maps to an output value of 7. In this case, when the input value is 6, the function f outputs 7.

Learn more about inverse function here:

https://brainly.com/question/29141206

#SPJ11

Metal A oxidizes three times faster than Metal B, with oxidation rates of 1/(2√3) grams per second and 1/(6√3) grams per second, respectively.

Metal A is oxidized three times faster than Metal B. Metal A oxidizes x grams in 2x√3 seconds, while Metal B oxidizes the same amount in 6x√3 seconds. To determine the relative speed, we compare the oxidation rates.

Metal A oxidizes x grams in 2x√3 seconds, which means it oxidizes x/(2x√3) = 1/(2√3) grams per second.

Metal B oxidizes x grams in 6x√3 seconds, so its oxidation rate is x/(6x√3) = 1/(6√3) grams per second. To find the ratio of their oxidation rates, we divide the rate of Metal A by the rate of Metal B:

(1/(2√3)) / (1/(6√3)) = 6/2 = 3.

Therefore, Metal A oxidizes three times faster than Metal B.

The problem provides the oxidation times for Metal A and Metal B and asks for the comparison of their oxidation rates. By calculating the oxidation rates for each metal, we find that Metal A oxidizes x grams in 2x√3 seconds, resulting in a rate of 1/(2√3) grams per second. Metal B, on the other hand, oxidizes x grams in 6x√3 seconds, leading to a rate of 1/(6√3) grams per second. To compare their speeds, we divide the rate of Metal A by the rate of Metal B, simplifying to 6/2, which equals 3. Therefore, Metal A oxidizes three times faster than Metal B.

LEARN MORE ABOUT oxidation here: brainly.com/question/13182308

#SPJ11

The center of the circle with the equation (x + 3)² + (y - 2)² = 49 is (-3, 2). Therefore, option b. (-3, 2) is the correct answer.

In the equation of a circle, (x - h)² + (y - k)² = r², the center of the circle is represented by the coordinates (h, k).

Comparing this with the given equation, we can identify that the center of the circle is (-3, 2) since the terms (x + 3) and (y - 2) are squared.

The value of "h" in (x + 3)² indicates the x-coordinate of the center, and the value of "k" in (y - 2)² represents the y-coordinate of the center.

Therefore, the center of the circle with the equation (x + 3)² + (y - 2)² = 49 is located at (-3, 2).

Learn more about Equation of Circle here:

brainly.com/question/23799314

#SPJ11

The integral for finding the area of the region is:

A = ∫[lower bound]^[upper bound] [rightmost bound] dy

A = ∫[1/6]^∞ [6] dy

To sketch the region enclosed by the curves and determine whether to integrate with respect to x or y, let's analyze the given equations:

y = 1/x

y = 1/x^2

x = 6

To begin, let's plot these curves on a coordinate plane:

First, we can observe that both equations involve hyperbolas. The equation y = 1/x represents a hyperbola that passes through the points (1,1), (2,0.5), (-1,-1), etc. The equation y = 1/x^2 represents a hyperbola that passes through the points (1,1), (2,0.25), (-1,1), etc.

Next, the equation x = 6 represents a vertical line passing through the point (6,0) on the x-axis.

Now, to determine the enclosed region, we need to find the limits of integration.

Since the curves intersect at certain points, we need to find these points of intersection. Equating the two equations for y and solving, we get:

1/x = 1/x^2

Multiplying both sides by x^2 yields:

x = 1

Hence, the curves intersect at x = 1.

Therefore, the region enclosed by the curves is bounded by the following:

The curve y = 1/x,

The curve y = 1/x^2,

The vertical line x = 6, and

The x-axis.

To determine whether to integrate with respect to x or y, we need to consider the orientation of the curves. In this case, the curves are defined in terms of y = f(x). Thus, it is more convenient to integrate with respect to y.

To find the area of the region, we need to set up the integral bounds. Since the region is bounded by the curves y = 1/x and y = 1/x^2, we need to find the limits of y.

The lower bound is determined by the curve y = 1/x^2, and the upper bound is determined by the curve y = 1/x. The vertical line x = 6 acts as the rightmost boundary.

Therefore, the integral for finding the area of the region is:

A = ∫[lower bound]^[upper bound] [rightmost bound] dy

A = ∫[1/6]^∞ [6] dy

Now, we can proceed with evaluating this integral to find the area of the enclosed region.

Learn more about area from

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11