The box plot displays the cost of a movie ticket in several cities.

A box plot uses a number line from 5 to 26 with tick marks every one unit. The box extends from 11 to 16 on the number line. A line in the box is at 13. The lines outside the box end at 6 and 25. The graph is titled Movie Ticket Prices, and the line is labeled Cost Of Ticket.

Which of the following is the best measure of center for the data shown, and what is that value?

A: The median is the best measure of center and equals 13.
B: The median is the best measure of center and equals 12.
C: The mean is the best measure of center and equals 12.
D: The mean is the best measure of center and equals 13.

Answer:

The radius of convergence (r) is 1/6.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine the Taylor series for the function f centered at 4, we need to get its derivatives and evaluate them at x = 4

.Let's start by finding the derivatives of f:

f'(x) = (-1)^1 * 1! * 3(1)(1 - 1) = 0f''(x)

= (-1)^2 * 2! * 3(2)(2 - 1)

= 12f'''(x)

= (-1)^3 * 3! * 3(3)(3 - 1)

= -108f''''(x)

= (-1)^4 * 4! * 3(4)(4 - 1)

= 432

Continuing this pattern, we can get the nth derivative:f^(n)(x) = (-1)^n * n! * 3n(n - 1).

Now, let's evaluate these derivatives at x = 4:

f(4) = f^(0)(4)

= (-1)^0 * 0! * 3(0)(0 - 1)

= 0f'(4)

= f^(1)(4)

= 0f''(4)

= f^(2)(4)

= 12f'''(4)

= f^(3)(4)

= -108f''''(4)

= f^(4)(4)

= 432

We can see that all the odd derivatives evaluate to zero at x = 4.

Next, we can express the Taylor series for f centered at 4 as follows:

f(x) = f(4) + f'(4)(x - 4)^1 + f''(4)(x - 4)^2 + f'''(4)(x - 4)^3 + ...

Since all the odd derivatives evaluate to zero at x = 4, we can simplify the Taylor series as:

f(x) = 0 + 0 + 12(x - 4)^2 + 0 + 432(x - 4)^4 + ...

Simplifying further, we have:

f(x) = 12(x - 4)^2 + 432(x - 4)^4 + ...

The radius of convergence (r) of the Taylor series can be determined using the ratio test. The ratio test states that if the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is L, then the series converges if L < 1 and diverges if L > 1.

In our case, the ratio of consecutive terms is:

L = lim(n->∞) |a(n+1) / a(n)|

For the Taylor series of f, the terms are:

a(n) = 12(x - 4)^2 for even values of na(n) = 432(x - 4)^4 for even values of n

Taking the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms and simplifying, we have:

L = lim(n->∞) |432(x - 4)^4 / 12(x - 4)^2|L

= lim(n->∞) |36(x - 4)^2|

The limit depends on the value of (x - 4)^2.

For the series to converge, we need |36(x - 4)^2| < 1. This means that the absolute value of (x - 4)^2 must be less than 1/36.

Therefore, the radius of convergence (r) is 1/6.The Taylor series for f centered at 4 is:f(x) = 12(x - 4)^2 + 432(x - 4)^

Learn more about radius of convergence here, https://brainly.com/question/17019250

#SPJ11

The p-value to interpret for the test of whether the average ending weight is less than the average beginning weight in the paired analysis is not provided in the question.

What is p-value?

The p-value is a probability value that measures the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis in a hypothesis test. It quantifies the likelihood of obtaining the observed data or more extreme results, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

In this scenario, a paired analysis is appropriate because the same group of students is measured before and after the diet intervention. Paired analysis allows for comparing the differences within each pair of observations.

To test if the average ending weight is less than the average beginning weight, a paired t-test can be performed. The null hypothesis (H₀) would state that there is no difference between the average beginning weight and the average ending weight. The alternative hypothesis (H₁) would state that the average ending weight is less than the average beginning weight.

By conducting the paired t-test, we calculate the test statistic and obtain the associated p-value. The p-value represents the probability of observing a difference as extreme as or more extreme than the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

However, without specific data or information about the test statistic or p-value, it is not possible to provide the p-value to interpret. To draw a conclusion about the effectiveness of the diet, the p-value needs to be compared to the chosen significance level (α) to determine if the difference in weights is statistically significant or not.

learn more about p-value here:

https://brainly.com/question/31833098

#SPJ4

The least common denominator (LCD) of the equation 1/2x + 2/x = x/2 is equal to 2x

The least common denominator (LCD) is a term commonly used in fractions. It refers to the smallest multiple that two or more denominators have in common.

Given the fractions of the equation:

1/2x + 2/x = x/2

The denominators of these fractions are 2x, x, and 2 respectively.

The multiples of 2x are: 2x, 4x, 6x,...

The multiples of x are: x, 2x, 6x,...

The multiples of 2 are: 2, 4, 6,...

The smallest multiple they have in common is 2x.

Therefore, the least common denominator (LCD) of the equation 1/2x + 2/x = x/2 is equal to 2x

Read more about LCD here:https://brainly.com/question/19249494

#SPJ1

There are 30,240 different ways that the museum can arrange the 5 paintings by Picasso on the wall here concept of the permutation is used.

To see why, we can use the permutation formula.

P(n, r) = n! / (n - r)!

where n! represents the factorial of n (i.e. the product of all positive integers up to and including n).

In this case, we have 10 paintings to choose from and we want to arrange 5 of them on the wall, so we can use the permutation formula to find the number of ways to do this:

P(10, 5) = 10! / (10 - 5)!= 30,240

Therefore, there are 30,240 different ways that the museum can arrange 5 paintings by Picasso on the wall.

https://brainly.com/question/1216161

#SPJ11

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean is approximately (48.450, 71.550).

What is confidence interval?

A confidence interval is a range of values that is used to estimate an unknown population parameter based on sample data. It provides a measure of the uncertainty or variability associated with the estimation. The confidence interval consists of two numbers, an upper bound and a lower bound, which define a range within which the true population parameter is likely to fall.

a-1. The value of the population mean is unknown. We are trying to estimate it using the sample data.

a-2. The best estimate of the population mean is the sample mean, which is 60 gallons.

c. For a 95% confidence interval, we need to find the value of t with (n-1) degrees of freedom. In this case, the sample size is 14, so the degrees of freedom is 14 - 1 = 13. Consulting the t-distribution table or using a statistical calculator, the value of t for a 95% confidence level with 13 degrees of freedom is approximately 2.160.

d. To develop the 95% confidence interval for the population mean, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = Sample Mean ± (t * Standard Error)

Standard Error = Standard Deviation / √Sample Size

Using the given values, we can calculate the standard error:

Standard Error = 20 / √14 ≈ 5.348

Substituting the values into the formula, we have:

Confidence Interval = 60 ± (2.160 * 5.348) ≈ 60 ± 11.550

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean is approximately (48.450, 71.550).

e. It would not be reasonable to conclude that the population mean is 52 gallons because the value of 52 falls outside the 95% confidence interval. Since the confidence interval includes the range of plausible values for the population mean, any value outside the interval is less likely to be the true population mean.

To know more about confidence interval visit:;

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

Answer:

Part A: See the chart below

Part B: The correlation is that the taller the players are, the more they weigh. The correlation coefficient is about 0.7 (0.6994)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Determine the minimum sample size required when you want to be 99​% confident that the sample mean is within one unit of the population mean and σ=11.6. Assume the population is normally distributed.

To determine the minimum sample size required to be 99% confident that the sample mean is within one unit of the population mean with a standard deviation of 11.6 and assuming the population is normally distributed , we can use the following formula:

n = (z*σ / E)^2

where n is the sample size, z* is the z-score corresponding to the confidence level (in this case, 2.58 for 99% confidence), σ is the population standard deviation, and E is the maximum error or distance between the sample mean and the population mean (in this case, 1 unit).

Plugging in the given values, we get:

n = (2.58 * 11.6 / 1)^2 n ≈ 284.7

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a minimum sample size of 285. Therefore, we need a sample size of at least 285 to be 99% confident that the sample mean is within one unit of the population mean , assuming a normal population distribution and a population standard deviation of 11.6.

Step-by-step explanation:

The smallest perimeter that Isabelle's new shape can have with three rectangles is 28 cm.

Given that each rectangle has a length of 5 cm and a width of 3 cm, we can consider two possible arrangements:

First arrangement:

The three rectangles are placed side by side, forming a longer shape. The total length of the new shape remains 5 cm, and the total width becomes 9 cm (3 cm + 3 cm + 3 cm)

Perimeter = 5 cm + 9 cm + 5 cm + 9 cm = 28 cm

Second arrangement:

Two rectangles are stacked vertically, and one is placed beside them horizontally.

The total length of the new shape becomes 8 cm (5 cm + 3 cm), and the total width remains 6 cm.

Perimeter = 8 cm + 6 cm + 8 cm + 6 cm = 28 cm

Therefore, the smallest perimeter that Isabelle's new shape can have with three rectangles is 28 cm.

To learn more on Perimeter click:

https://brainly.com/question/7486523

#SPJ1

We can use the formula for the distance from a point to a plane, which involves finding the projection of the vector from the point to the plane onto the normal vector of the plane. The closest point will be the point on the plane that is reached by adding this projection vector to the given point.

To find the point on the plane x + 4y + 5z = 16 that is closest to the point (1,1,1), we first need to find the normal vector of the plane. The coefficients of x, y, and z in the equation of the plane give us the components of the normal vector, which is (1, 4, 5).

Next, we need to find the vector from the given point (1,1,1) to the plane. This vector is given by subtracting the coordinates of any point on the plane from the coordinates of the given point. For convenience, we can choose the point (1,0,0) on the plane, which gives us the vector (0, 1, 1).

To find the projection of this vector onto the normal vector of the plane, we can use the formula for the projection of a vector u onto a vector v:

proj_v(u) = (u · v / |v|^2) * v

where · denotes the dot product and |v| denotes the length of v. Plugging in the values of u and v, we get:

proj_(1,4,5)((0,1,1)) = ((0,1,1) · (1,4,5) / |(1,4,5)|^2) * (1,4,5)

= (4/42) * (1,4,5)

= (2/21, 8/21, 10/21)

Finally, we can find the closest point on the plane by adding this projection vector to the given point (1,1,1). This gives us the point:

(1,1,1) + (2/21, 8/21, 10/21) = (23/21, 29/21, 31/21)

Therefore, the point on the plane x + 4y + 5z = 16 closest to the point (1,1,1) is (23/21, 29/21, 31/21).

To learn more about normal vector click here : brainly.com/question/31479401

#SPJ11

We can use the formula for the distance from a point to a plane, which involves finding the projection of the vector from the point to the plane onto the normal vector of the plane. The closest point will be the point on the plane that is reached by adding this projection vector to the given point.

To find the point on the plane x + 4y + 5z = 16 that is closest to the point (1,1,1), we first need to find the normal vector of the plane. The coefficients of x, y, and z in the equation of the plane give us the components of the normal vector, which is (1, 4, 5).

Next, we need to find the vector from the given point (1,1,1) to the plane. This vector is given by subtracting the coordinates of any point on the plane from the coordinates of the given point. For convenience, we can choose the point (1,0,0) on the plane, which gives us the vector (0, 1, 1).

To find the projection of this vector onto the normal vector of the plane, we can use the formula for the projection of a vector u onto a vector v:

proj_v(u) = (u · v / |v|^2) * v

where · denotes the dot product and |v| denotes the length of v. Plugging in the values of u and v, we get:

proj_(1,4,5)((0,1,1)) = ((0,1,1) · (1,4,5) / |(1,4,5)|^2) * (1,4,5)

= (4/42) * (1,4,5)

= (2/21, 8/21, 10/21)

Finally, we can find the closest point on the plane by adding this projection vector to the given point (1,1,1). This gives us the point:

(1,1,1) + (2/21, 8/21, 10/21) = (23/21, 29/21, 31/21)

Therefore, the point on the plane x + 4y + 5z = 16 closest to the point (1,1,1) is (23/21, 29/21, 31/21).

To learn more about normal vector click here : brainly.com/question/31479401

#SPJ11

The number of frogs among the four amphibians is [tex]$\boxed{\textbf{(C)}\ 2}$.[/tex]

If Brian is a toad, then Mike must be a frog, and vice versa. Therefore, Brian and Mike cannot be of different species. Hence, Brian is a frog. Since Chris is a frog if and only if LeRoy is a toad, and since Chris's statement is false, we know that LeRoy is a frog. This implies that Chris's statement is true, which is a contradiction.

Therefore, Chris is also a frog. Finally, Mike's statement implies that there are at least two toads among the four amphibians. Since Brian and Mike are both frogs, the other two amphibians, Chris and LeRoy, must both be toads. Therefore, the number of frogs among the four amphibians is [tex]$\boxed{\textbf{(C)}\ 2}$.[/tex]

For more questions like Frogs click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/3505647

#SPJ11

While a data set consisting only of anomalous objects is possible, it would be an abuse of the terminology since it would not reflect the expected or normal behavior of the system.

It's possible for a dataset to consist only of anomalous objects if the dataset has been specifically curated to include dissimilar documents, as you've described. In this context, the term "anomalous" refers to documents that are not highly related, connected, or similar to one another.

However, it's important to note that this might be an unusual case or an atypical use of the term "anomalous," as anomalies generally refer to rare or unexpected occurrences within a larger, more homogeneous dataset.

In your described scenario, the selected documents might be more accurately referred to as "diverse" or "dissimilar" rather than strictly "anomalous."

For similar question on dataset.

https://brainly.com/question/14548171

#SPJ11

The proof that the trigonometry equation [tex]\frac{\cos(x)}{\(sec(x)\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex] is an identity is shown below

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

[tex]\frac{\cos(x)}{\(sec(x)\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

To prove the trigonometry equation is an identity, we start by simplifying the left-hand side of the equation using trigonometric identities

So, we have

[tex]\frac{\cos(x)}{\sec(x)\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

sec(x) = 1/cos(x)

So, we have

[tex]\frac{\cos(x)}{\frac{1}{\cos(x)} * \sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

When the product is evaluated, the equation becomes

[tex]\frac{\cos^2(x)}{\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

cos²(x) = 1 - sin²(x).

So, we have

[tex]\frac{1 - \sin\²(x)}{\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

Expand the fraction

[tex]\frac{1}{\sin(x)} - \frac{\sin\²(x)}{\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

Simplify the fraction

csc(x) - sin(x) = csc(x) - sin(x)

Because both sides of the equation are the same

It means that we have proven that [tex]\frac{\cos(x)}{\(sec(x)\sin(x)} = \csc(x) - \sin(x)[/tex]

The graph that proves the identity is also added as an attachment

Read more about trigonometry function at

https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

a. The probability that Miami will be hit by a hurricane in any given year is 1/25.

b. The probability that Miami will be hit by hurricanes in both of the next two consecutive years is (1/25) x (1/25) = 1/625.

c. The probability that Miami will be hit by hurricanes in either the next year or the year after is equal to the probability of Miami being hit in the next year plus the probability of Miami being hit in the year after next minus the probability of Miami being hit in both years. Therefore, the probability is (1/25) + (1/25) - (1/625) = 49/625.

d. The probability that Miami will be hit by at least one hurricane in the next seven years can be calculated as the complement of the probability that Miami will not be hit by any hurricanes in the next seven years. The probability of Miami not being hit by a hurricane in any given year is (24/25), so the probability of Miami not being hit in seven years is (24/25)^7.

Therefore, the probability of Miami being hit by at least one hurricane in the next seven years is 1 - (24/25)^7, which is approximately 20.356%.

Based on historical records, Miami is hit by a hurricane once every 25 years, so the probability of Miami being hit by a hurricane in any given year is 1/25. To calculate the probability of Miami being hit by hurricanes in both of the next two consecutive years, we multiply the probability of Miami being hit in one year by the probability of Miami being hit in the following year, which gives us 1/625.

To calculate the probability of Miami being hit by hurricanes in either the next year or the year after, we add the probability of Miami being hit in the next year to the probability of Miami being hit in the year after next and subtract the probability of Miami being hit in both years. This gives us a probability of 49/625.

To calculate the probability of Miami being hit by at least one hurricane in the next seven years, we use the complement rule. We calculate the probability of Miami not being hit by any hurricanes in the next seven years and subtract it from 1. The probability of Miami not being hit by a hurricane in any given year is 24/25, so the probability of Miami not being hit in seven years is (24/25)^7.

Therefore, the probability of Miami being hit by at least one hurricane in the next seven years is 1 - (24/25)^7, which is approximately 20.356%.

For more questions like Probability click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

The container would hold 2040 cubic feet of shipped goods when it's three-quarters full.

The dimensions of the container are given as 40 ft by 8 ft by 8 ft 6 in. We need to convert the height of 8 ft 6 in to feet by dividing it by 12 since there are 12 inches in a foot:

8 ft 6 in = 8 ft + (6 in / 12) ft

         = 8 ft + 0.5 ft

         = 8.5 ft

Now we can calculate the volume of the container:

Volume = Length × Width × Height

      = 40 ft × 8 ft × 8.5 ft

      = 2720 ft³

To find the volume when the container is three-quarters full, we multiply the total volume by 0.75:

Volume when three-quarters full = 2720 ft³ × 0.75

                              = 2040 ft³

Therefore, the container would hold 2040 cubic feet of shipped goods when it's three-quarters full.

Learn more about Volume at https://brainly.com/question/27710307

#SPJ1

The value of "a" in the equation of the parabola in the form f(x) = [tex]a(x-h)^2 + k[/tex] can be determined by using the given information. The value of "a" for this specific parabola is 1/4.

The vertex form of a quadratic function is given by f(x) = [tex]a(x-h)^2 + k[/tex], where (h, k) represents the vertex of the parabola. In this case, the vertex is (3, 8).

Using the vertex form and substituting the given vertex coordinates, we have f(x) = a(x-3)^2 + 8.

We also know that the parabola passes through the point (-5, 24). We can substitute these coordinates into the equation to get 24 = [tex]a(-5-3)^2 + 8[/tex].

Simplifying further, we have 24 = [tex]a(-8)^2 + 8[/tex], which becomes 24 = 64a + 8.

To isolate "a," we subtract 8 from both sides: 16 = 64a.

Finally, we divide both sides by 64: 1/4 = a.

Therefore, the value of "a" in the equation of the parabola is 1/4.

Learn more about parabola here:

https://brainly.com/question/11911877

#SPJ11

The point on the sphere nearest to (0,-6,-7) is (0,-2,-7/3).

To find the point on the sphere nearest to the point (0,-6,-7), we need to minimize the distance between the point and the sphere. The distance between the point (x, y, z) and (0,-6,-7) is given by the distance formula:

d = sqrt((x-0)^2 + (y+6)^2 + (z+7)^2)

Since we want to minimize the distance, we can minimize d^2 instead:

d^2 = (x-0)^2 + (y+6)^2 + (z+7)^2

Now we need to find the point on the sphere that minimizes d^2 subject to the constraint x^2(y^2)^2(z^2+7^2) = 9.

To do this, we can use Lagrange multipliers. We need to minimize the function:

F(x,y,z,λ) = (x-0)^2 + (y+6)^2 + (z+7)^2 + λ(x^2(y^2)^2(z^2+7^2) - 9)

Taking the partial derivatives and setting them equal to zero, we get:

2(x-0) + 2λxy^4(z^2+7^2) = 0

2(y+6) + 2λx^2y^3(z^2+7^2) = 0

2(z+7) + 2λx^2(y^2)^2z = 0

x^2(y^2)^2(z^2+7^2) - 9 = 0

Simplifying and solving for x, y, z, and λ, we get:

x = 0

y = -2

z = -7/3

λ = -9/(1764(5/4))

Therefore, the point on the sphere is (0,-2,-7/3).

To learn more about constraint, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/30703729

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (b) 4 Dummy Variables: Sedan, Station Wagon, Van and Other.

To model the style factor with 5 categories, we need to use 4 dummy variables, one for each category except the base case (sportscar). The appropriate set of dummy variables would be:

d1 = 1 if the car is a sedan, 0 otherwise

d2 = 1 if the car is a station wagon, 0 otherwise

d3 = 1 if the car is a van, 0 otherwise

d4 = 1 if the car is other, 0 otherwise

Note that we do not need a separate dummy variable for sportscar, as it is already included in the intercept term of the regression model. This is because the intercept term represents the expected mileage for the base case (sportscar) when all dummy variables are zero.

Therefore, the correct answer is (b) 4 Dummy Variables: Sedan, Station Wagon, Van and Other.

Learn more about variables

https://brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

The population when t=10 is approximately 281943.6.

This problem can be modeled by the following differential equation:

dp/dt = -k*p, where k is a constant of proportionality.

The general solution to this differential equation is:

p(t) = [tex]Ce^{(-k*t)}[/tex], where C is a constant of integration.

We can use the given initial conditions to find the values of C and k.

p(2) = 400000 = [tex]Ce^{(-2k)}[/tex]

p(4) = 350000 = [tex]Ce^{(-4k)}[/tex]

Dividing these equations, we get:

400000/350000 = [tex]e^{(2k)}[/tex]

ln(400000/350000) = 2k

k = ln(400000/350000) / 2

k ≈ 0.0436

Substituting this value of k into one of the initial conditions, we get:

400000 = [tex]Ce^{(-2*0.0436)}[/tex]

C ≈ 496277.4

Therefore, the population function is:

p(t) = 496277.4 [tex]e^{(-0.0436*t)}[/tex]

To find the population when t=10, we can substitute t=10 into this function:

p(10) = 496277.4[tex]e^{(-0.0436*10)}[/tex] ≈ 281943.6

Therefore, the population when t=10 is approximately 281943.6.

To know more about population refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11

The appropriate conclusion is:

(1) P-value = 0.0099, There is sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance

What is null hypothesis?

In statistics, the null hypothesis (H0) is a statement that assumes that there is no significant difference between two or more groups, samples, or populations.

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of Reed College students who graduate in two years is equal to 0.07, and the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion is greater than 0.07.

To determine the p-value, we can use a one-tailed z-test for the proportion.

The test statistic is calculated as:

z = (p - P) / √(P(1-P)/n)

where p is the sample proportion, P is the hypothesized proportion, and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (12/90 - 0.07) / √(0.07 * 0.93 / 90) = 2.72

Using a z-table, we can find the area to the right of z = 2.72, which is approximately 0.003.

Since this is a one-tailed test, we multiply the area by 2 to get the p-value:

p-value = 0.006

The p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, so we reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, The appropriate conclusion is:

(1) P-value = 0.0099, There is sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance, to conclude that the proportion of Reed College students that will graduate in two years is greater than 0.07.

To learn more about null hypothesis from the given link:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

The surface area of the regular pyramid can be calculated using the formula: SA = (base area) + (0.5 × perimeter of base × slant height).

The surface area of a regular pyramid is found by adding the base area to half the product of the perimeter of the base and the slant height. The base area is calculated by multiplying the length and width of the base, and the slant height is the distance between the apex (top) of the pyramid and the base along the slanting edges. By plugging in the given measurements, multiplying the base length and width, finding the perimeter of the base, and then substituting the values into the formula, the surface area of the regular pyramid can be determined.

Learn more about  surface area

brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A linear function will result in a straight line.  Thus, the difference between each x coordinate will be the same and the difference between each y coordinate will be the same.  

For example, in Table A, the difference for each X coordinate is  2 (9-7. 7-5, etc...).  

However, the difference between the Y coordinates is -2 until you reach the last one where 1-0 is -1 so it is not linear.  

Applying this to the other tables shows the linear function in Table C.

After eight bounces, the height of the ball is,

⇒ 0.518 feet

Now, we know that the ball falls from 10 feet off the ground, so its initial height is 10 feet.

Then, we know that with each bounce, the ball loses 60% of its height.

This means that after one bounce, the ball will be at 40% of its initial height, or 4 feet.

Hence, For the height of the ball after two bounces, we need to take 60% of the height after one bounce, which is,

⇒ 0.6 × 4 = 2.4 feet.

So the height of the ball after two bounces is,

⇒ 4 + 2.4 = 6.4 feet.

Hence, After three bounces, the height of the ball is,

4 + 0.6 2.4 = 5.44 feet.

After four bounces, the height of the ball is,

4 + 0.6 0.6 * 4 = 4.864 feet.

So, after eight bounces, the height of the ball is,

4 + 0.6 x 10 = 0.518 feet,

Learn more about the multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10873737

#SPJ1

The Laplace transform of f(t) is f(s) = (1/(s-2)) - 8 e^(-4s).

We can split the function into two parts:

f(t) = e^(2t) - 8h(t-4)

Taking the Laplace transform of each part separately, we get:

L{e^(2t)} = ∫_0^∞ e^(-st) e^(2t) dt = ∫_0^∞ e^(t(2-s)) dt = 1/(s-2) (by using the Laplace transform formula for e^(at))

L{8h(t-4)} = 8 e^(-4s) (by using the formula for the Laplace transform of the unit step function h(t-a))

Thus, the Laplace transform of f(t) is:

f(s) = L{f(t)} = L{e^(2t)} - L{8h(t-4)} = 1/(s-2) - 8 e^(-4s)

Therefore, the Laplace transform of f(t) is f(s) = (1/(s-2)) - 8 e^(-4s).

To know more about Laplace transform refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31481915

#SPJ11

The area of the triangle is 162a^2 * √2 square centimeters.

Let's denote the base length of the triangle as b and the height as h. According to the given information, we have:

Base length (b) = 6a√2

Height (h) = b + 3

To find the area of the triangle, we can use the formula:

Area = (1/2) * base * height

Substituting the values we have:

Area = (1/2) * (6a√2) * (6a√2 + 3)

Simplifying the expression:

Area = (1/2) * (36a^2 * √2) * (6a√2 + 3)

Area = (1/2) * (36a^2 * √2 * 6a√2 + 36a^2 * √2 * 3)

Area = (1/2) * (216a^2 * √2 + 108a^2 * √2)

Area = (1/2) * 324a^2 * √2

Area = 162a^2 * √2

Know more about triangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

The suitable property to use is the distributive property and the simplified expression is -37000

The suitable property to use is the distributive property. The distributive property states that the product of a number and a sum is equal to the sum of the products of the number and each of the terms in the sum.

Using the distributive property to simplify this expression states that:

a(b + c) = ab + ac

In this case:

-37 + 999 × –37 = -37(1 + 999)

Then simplify the expression as follows:

-37(1 + 999) = -37(1000) = -37000

Therefore, the simplified expression is -37000.

Find out more on distributive property here: https://brainly.com/question/2807928

#SPJ1

The ratio of the heights of the larger pyramid to the smaller pyramid is 4 : 3

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The pyramids (see attachment)

Where we have
Big pyramid = 22 m

Small pyramid = 16.5 m

The ratio is represented as

Ratio = Big pyramid : Small pyramid

So, we have

Ratio = 22 : 16.5

So, we have

Ratio = 4 : 3

Hence, the ratio of the larger pyramid to the smaller pyramid is 4 : 3

Read more about similar shapes at

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1