The tax levied by the state of Ohio based on the purchase price is known as the state conveyance fee. The correct option is B.
The state conveyance fee is a tax levied by the state of Ohio based on the purchase price of real property. It is assessed whenever property is transferred from one owner to another. The fee is calculated at a rate of $1.00 for every $1,000 of the property's sale price, rounded up to the nearest $100. For example, if a property sells for $150,000, the state conveyance fee would be $150.
This fee is typically paid by the seller, but the parties can negotiate who will pay it. The purpose of the state conveyance fee is to generate revenue for the state of Ohio, which uses the funds to support various programs and services. The correct option is B.
Learn more about tax levied at:
brainly.com/question/30546652
#SPJ4
When a higher court hears a case that has been previously decided at a lower level, it is using its authority of:
a. original jurisdiction
b. appellate jurisdiction
c. stare decisis
When a higher court hears a matter that has already been determined at a lower level, it is exercising its appellate jurisdictional authority.
What is the process known as when someone can challenge a lower court's ruling in an appeal to a higher court?Appeals resulting from civil disputes are referred to as civil appeals. In the essence, the Code of Civil Process governs civil appeals. A higher court's ability to reverse a decision is known as appellate jurisdiction.
What is the stare decisis doctrine?Stare decisis refers to the court's practise of upholding precedent. Literally, it means "to uphold settled affairs." Stare decisis is a contraction of the Latin expression "stare decisis et non quieta movere." To "stand by choices and not to upset established topics" is the meaning of this expression.
To know more about appellate jurisdictional visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/8849005
#SPJ1
The Negligent _______ doctrine has been used by courts to impose liability on employers when employees have a high level of public contract or the employees are entrusted in caring for vulnerable populations
The Negligent Entrustment doctrine has been used by courts to impose liability on employers when employees have a high level of public contact or the employees are entrusted in caring for vulnerable populations.
When workers have a lot of contact with the public or are entrusted with looking after vulnerable populations, courts have used the negligent entrustment doctrine to hold employers liable.
According to this doctrine, if the employer knew or should have known that the employee was unfit for the job or had a history of dangerous behavior but still permitted the employee to perform the job duties, the employer can be held accountable for the employee's negligent acts. The doctrine is frequently applied in situations where hiring, supervising, and retaining employees were negligent.
To know more about Negligent Entrustment doctrine. here
https://brainly.com/question/14789731
#SPJ4
It is possible to limit the exercise of any entitlement by the owner of a thing contractually. Elaborate whether or not you agree with this statement?
Yes, generally it is possible to limit the exercise of any entitlement by the owner of a thing contractually.
The owner of an item frequently has the option of agreeing to a contract with another party that restricts the execution of that party's entitlements or rights. A software creator may engage into a licence agreement with a user that restricts user's capacity to change or redistribute software, or a homeowner may enter into a contract with a renter that restricts tenant's use of property.
The amount to which the exercise of a right or entitlement can be constrained by contract, however, may be subject to legal restrictions. For instance, legislation protecting certain rights that cannot be waived or negotiated away may exist in some jurisdictions. Furthermore, any contractual restrictions on rights or entitlements must be properly drafted to ensure they are enforceable in court and do not violate any laws.
Read more about entitlement on:
https://brainly.com/question/24224291
#SPJ4
explain one political consequence that countries face as their populationas age
the role of a social institution from a functionalist perspective is to select one: a. meet basic social needs. b. foster everyday behavior. c. preserve autonomy. d. influence the masses.
The role of a social institution from a functionalist perspective is to meet basic social needs. option (A) is correct.
The functionalist point of view endeavors to clarify social organizations as the need might arise. It is at times called primary functionalism since it frequently centers around the ways social designs (e.g., social organizations) address social issues.
Functionalism stresses the significance of social foundations for social solidness and infers that expansive social change will be socially unsafe. The struggle hypothesis underscores social imbalance and proposes that extensive social change is expected to accomplish an equitable society.
Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about social institution:
https://brainly.com/question/30911389
#SPJ4
norms governing everyday behavior, the violation of which raises comparatively little concern, are known as select one: a. mores. b. cultural universals. c. folkways. d. laws.
Norms governing everyday behavior, the violation of which raises comparatively little concern, are known as folkways. The right answer is c.
Folkway is a social group's acquired behaviour that establishes a customary code of conduct. Folkways, according to the term's inventor, American sociologist William Graham Sumner, are social customs that the group's members do not deem to be morally significant.
Folkways emerge through the continuous repeating of behaviours that successfully satiate fundamental human needs, just like habits do. These behaviours standardise and gain acceptance. Folkways primarily function subconsciously and endure because they are practical.
The correct answer is option c.
Know more about folkways here
https://brainly.com/question/9044207
#SPJ4
Eton files a suit in a federal district court against Florida, alleging employment discrimina¬tion under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. The state asks the court to dismiss the suit. The court is most likely to rule that
a. the state is immune from the suit.
b. the suit can proceed.
c. Eton is immune from any defense the state might offer.
d. the court is immune from such request.
The state requests that the court dismiss the lawsuit. The state will probably be declared immune from the lawsuit by the court.
How is litigation funding referred to?A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against one or more other parties. Only a few laws from long ago that are still in force today include the phrase "suit in law." A dispute between individuals or groups that is taken to court for resolution: bring/file/threaten to sue SB Two ladies filed a lawsuit for sexual harassment against their former employer. A litigation should be dropped, settled, or dismissed. Legal actions that are resolved in court entail the plaintiff suing the defendant for damages.The financial compensation granted to a plaintiff in a court case is known as compensatory damages. In civil court situations, this kind of compensation is given.To learn more about lawsuit, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1065754
god's nation israel existed for over years before moses wrote the law.
This statement god's nation israel existed for over years before moses wrote the law is made by some religious scholars and believers, but it is not historically accurate.
In general , Moses is believed to have led the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt and received the Ten Commandments and other laws from God on Mount Sinai. These laws and commandments, known as the Mosaic Law or the Law of Moses, formed the basis for the religious and civil life of the Israelites.
Also, while the people of Israel existed before Moses, the nation of Israel as an organized entity with a system of laws did not exist until after Moses received the Law from God.
To learn more about Law from God , here
brainly.com/question/29999884
#SPJ4
Additional factors include: Vexatious motive. Where there is no evidence that the plaintiff had X in bringing the case specifically in a particular forum, courts usually deny the FNC motion.
A proper intent
B improper intent
C improper intention
D) proper intention
The correct answer is D) proper intention. A proper intent refers to an intent to pursue a claim in good faith and for the purpose of obtaining a valid legal remedy.
What is legal remedy?Legal remedy is a form of redress or compensation provided by the court system for a wrong or injury suffered by an individual as a result of another's actions or inaction. It is a form of legal action that seeks to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in if the wrong or injury had not occurred. Legal remedies can include monetary damages, such as compensatory damages, or non-monetary remedies, such as an injunction.
This type of intent is generally accepted by courts in determining whether a case is appropriate for a particular forum. Improper intent, on the other hand, would include an intent to harass or vex the defendant, which would be a valid basis for a FNC motion to be denied.
To learn more about legal remedy
https://brainly.com/question/28997429
#SPJ1
The rule established in federal and state courts that allows for certain appeals to be made before
a verdict is reached is referred to as the __________ appeal exception.
interlocutory
mid-trial
exigent
intervening
The rule established in federal and state courts that allows for certain appeals to be made before a verdict is reached is referred to as the interlocutory appeal exception.
What is interlocutory appeal ?An interlocutory appeal, can be described as the term that is been used in law of civil procedure which is very common in the United States.
It should be noted that this term is used to refers to the occurrence when a ruling by a trial court is appealed even though the aspects of the case are still proceeding, hence it can be seen as the common appeal.
Learn more about appeal at:
https://brainly.com/question/25915978
#SPJ1
under title vii of the civil rights act, most private firms are required to implement affirmative action policies. a. true b. false
The given statement "under title vii of the civil rights act, most private firms are required to implement affirmative action policies." is false as most private firms are not required to implement affirmative action policies.
Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, but it does not require affirmative action.
Affirmative action refers to policies or programs that give preferential treatment to individuals from underrepresented groups in an effort to promote diversity and overcome past discrimination. While affirmative action programs may be implemented voluntarily by private firms, they are not required by law under Title VII.
However, federal contractors and subcontractors are required to implement affirmative action policies under Executive Order 11246, which was signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965. This order requires contractors and subcontractors who do business with the federal government to take affirmative action to ensure that their employment practices are free from discrimination and promote diversity.
Learn more about civil rights act at:
brainly.com/question/12447824
#SPJ4
mary hired broker justin to find a ready, willing, and able buyer to purchase her home using an exclusive right to sell listing agreement. a few weeks before the expiration of the listing agreement, but prior to any sale, mary decided to cancel the listing agreement.
Mary's decision to cancel the exclusive right to sell listing agreement with her broker, Justin, a few weeks before the expiration of the agreement, raises important legal and ethical questions. Mary may be liable for breach of contract.
Under the terms of an exclusive right to sell listing agreement, Mary granted Justin the exclusive right to market and sell her home during the term of the agreement.
In return, Justin was obligated to use his best efforts to find a ready, willing, and able buyer for Mary's home. The agreement typically includes a specific expiration date, after which Mary is free to sell her home on her own or with another broker.
However, if Mary decides to cancel the agreement before the expiration date, she may be liable for breach of contract. The agreement may also include a provision for payment of a commission to Justin if he finds a buyer during the term of the agreement, even if the sale occurs after the expiration date.
To cancel the agreement, Mary should review the terms of the agreement carefully, including any provisions regarding cancellation and commission payments.
She should also notify Justin in writing of her decision to cancel the agreement and keep a copy of the written notice for her records.
If Justin has already found a potential buyer for Mary's home, Mary may still be obligated to pay a commission to Justin if the sale occurs within a certain time period after the expiration of the agreement.
This is known as a protection period or tail clause, which is typically included in exclusive right to sell listing agreements.
In summary, while Mary has the right to cancel the exclusive right to sell listing agreement with her broker, Justin, she should do so carefully and in accordance with the terms of the agreement to avoid any potential legal or ethical issues.
For more question on "Breach of Contract" :
https://brainly.com/question/31437165
#SPJ11
What essential conditions are necessary for a combustion reaction (fire triangle)?
Answer:
An oxygen, heat, and fuel triangle is commonly referred to as the "fire triangle." Add the fourth element, the chemical reaction, and you have a fire "tetrahedron." If you take any of these four things away, you will either not have a fire or it will be extinguished.
Explanation:
Please give the brainliest, really appreciated. Thank you
the court case eeoc v. founders pavillion, inc. illustrated enforcement of which law(s)?
The court case EEOC v. Founders Pavillion, Inc., which was heard in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, illustrated enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.
Title VII makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals who are 40 years of age or older.
In this case, the EEOC alleged that Founders Pavillion, Inc. had discriminated against two individuals based on their age and race. The court found that the company had, in fact, violated the two laws and ordered them to pay damages to the two individuals.
To know more about Discrimination , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29801080
#SPJ4
of all the defendants exonerated by dna evidence, what percentage of them were convicted in cases of mistaken identity?
It is difficult to estimate the exact percentage of defendants exonerated by DNA evidence who were convicted in cases of mistaken identity, as the available studies do not provide a clear answer.
However, a 2017 report by the National Registry of Exonerations states that of all defendants exonerated by DNA evidence, 36% were convicted in cases of mistaken identity. The report also states that misidentifications made by witnesses are the leading cause of wrongful convictions in the United States.
In addition, a 2019 study by the Innocence Project states that of the 338 DNA exonerations since 1989, 77% were based on non-DNA evidence, with mistaken witness identification being the most common cause of wrongful conviction. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that a significant proportion of those exonerated by DNA evidence were convicted in cases of mistaken identity.
To know more about DNA , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/264225
#SPJ4
the independent treasury completely separated the federal government from the nation’s banking system. true or false?
True. The Independent Treasury System, also known as the Subtreasury System, was a financial system that completely separated the federal government from the nation's banking system.
It was established in 1846 after years of controversy over the role of the federal government in banking and finance. Under this system, the federal government collected and disbursed its own funds without using private banks. The government stored its money in subtreasury buildings in various cities, rather than in banks, and used its own employees to handle the transactions. The Independent Treasury System was in place until 1921 when it was replaced by the modern Federal Reserve System.
Learn more about Independent Treasury System
https://brainly.com/question/29896654
#SPJ4
Please write an essay on:
What are the laws of conservation of protected areas in the
United Arabs Emirates
Gangs still flourish in many areas of the country, which has forced criminal justice officials and lawmakers to resort to ________ strategies.
Gangs still flourish in many areas of the country, which has forced criminal justice officials and lawmakers to resort to tougher and more comprehensive strategies in order to combat gang activity and ensure public safety.
To help students improve their reading comprehension, teachers should teach them the seven cognitive processes used by proficient readers: activation, insinuating, monitoring-clarifying, questioning, searching-selecting, summarising, and visualizing-organizing.
The best understanding techniques are:Summarizing.The fundamentals of how to use and activate it.Predicting.forming judgements.asking questions and giving answers.Visualizing.understanding oversightAs part of word reading interventions, comprehension strategies can be used to help your young students comprehend a chapter, text, or story. Several reading comprehension intervention approaches can be used with young children even before they can talk or read. In order to foster general thinking, logic, and creativity in children, it is important that they learn to pay attention to details, recognise hidden meanings, and seek the big picture.
Learn more about comprehension strategies here
https://brainly.com/question/29620445
#SPJ11
a fact that is of significance to a reasonable party which affects the party’s decision to enter into a real estate contract is called
A material fact is a fact that, to a reasonable party, would be important and would influence that party's choice to engage in a real estate contract.
What is meant by Material fact?A material fact is a fact that a reasonable person would consider relevant to the choice that needs to be taken, as opposed to minor, inconsequential, or irrelevant detail. In other words, it is a fact whose concealment would probably lead to a different choice.Examples of established Material Facts include the fact that the property was the scene of a murder or other major crime, the presence of asbestos or flammable cladding on or inside the property, and the fact that the property had previously been used as an illegal drug manufacturing facility.Structure-related issues with the home, soil issues, a leaky roof, unauthorized development, noise issues in the neighborhood, and any other issues that a buyer could find significant are examples of material facts that must be reported.To learn more about Material fact, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/16457245
Door-to-door contacts that police make with citizens to make policing more personalin nature is called
Door-to-door contacts that police make with citizens to make policing more personal in nature is called "community policing" or "neighborhood policing."
This approach fosters stronger relationships between law enforcement and the community, leading to improved public trust and cooperation.
Instead of only reacting to calls for assistance, community-oriented police put more of an emphasis on preventing crime and resolving social problems. This ideology is based on the notion that the police and the community must work together as partners to address the current difficulties affecting contemporary society. One of the most important tactical elements of community policing is problem-solving. Other tactical elements include constructive interaction and teamwork.
Some of the characteristics of community policing that have been noted in the papers include proactive crime prevention, increased visibility for police operations, the decentralisation of police operations to meet the needs of various neighbourhoods and constituencies, and increased cooperation between the police and community members.
Learn more about Community policing here
brainly.com/question/28366939
#SPJ11
the european union eu is an example of a free trade area multilateral trade negotiation customs union (True or False)
Answer: false
Explanation:
the statement is false as the EU is not a free trade area, nor a multilateral trade negotiation, but a customs union.
When English judges were asked to try a case, they would look for a _____.
When English judges were asked to try a case, they would look for a precedent. Precedent refers to a legal decision or case that serves as an authoritative guide for future similar cases.
English common law, which originated in medieval England, relied heavily on precedent as the main source of law. The doctrine of stare decisis, which means "let the decision stand," required judges to follow the decisions made in previous cases, as long as those decisions were based on sound legal reasoning and principles. Thus, when judges were asked to try a case, they would search for a precedent that would provide guidance and establish the appropriate legal principles to apply to the current case.
Learn more about English judges
https://brainly.com/question/30207523
#SPJ4
treason is the only crime mentioned in the u.s. constitution. (True or False)
True. The Constitution of the United States mentions treason as the only crime. Specifically, Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution defines treason as "levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
The Constitution also establishes the requirements for conviction of treason, which include testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or a confession in open court. While the Constitution does not mention any other specific crimes, it grants Congress the power to define and punish offenses against the United States in Article I, Section 8, and the federal criminal code has expanded significantly since the Constitution was written.
Learn more about treason
https://brainly.com/question/934001
#SPJ4
a plaintiff files a lawsuit against a defendant. the defendant, in turn, files a lawsuit against the plaintiff (a) and against a co-defendant (b). these two actions, (a) and (b) are called:
