Answer:
True
Explanation:
That statement describes liberal viewpoints
what does the vote have to be to convict the kid of first degree murder?
The votes have to be unanimous to convict the kid of first-degree murder. The sentence for first-degree murder might range from a minimum of 25 years to a maximum of life without the possibility of release.
Before you are found guilty, the prosecution must persuade the jury that your objectives were related to the specific crime. First-degree murder usually involves planning and calls for deliberate action on the side of the accused. For instance, before they committed the crime, they might have kept the victim on hand.
The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a Louisiana legislation today that permits major offenses to be adjudicated without a unanimous verdict from the jury. A 1972 decision that supported such verdicts was reversed by the 6-3 decision. Nina Totenberg, an NPR legal affairs correspondent, provides updates.
The Supreme Court left open the issue of whether those 1,700 individuals have the right to a retrial, or, to put it another way if the ruling made today would ultimately be applied retroactively. There has never been any question that the federal government is subject to the unanimous jury requirement. Here, the issue was whether the states also enjoyed the right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment.
To learn more about first-degree murder, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/13097311
#SPJ4
which scenario would violate a person’s 5th amendment right?
When confessions are coerced from a suspect, their 5th amendment right has been violated.
The fifth amendment right states that “no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself".
The right to stay silent, the right to have legal representation present while being questioned, and the right to have a government-appointed lawyer if the suspect cannot afford one are all examples of what are known as the Miranda rights.
The Fifth Amendment is divided into five rights or safeguards: the right to a jury trial when you are accused of a crime, the safeguard against double jeopardy, the safeguard against self-incrimination, the safeguard for a fair trial, and the safeguard against the government seizing your property without just compensation.
To know more about the fifth amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30391361
#SPJ4
what is rasmussen presidential poll?
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll is a political poll conducted by the polling firm Rasmussen Reports.
The poll is a daily snapshot of likely voters' opinions on the job performance of the current President of the United States. The poll also includes questions about presidential approval ratings, the direction of the country, and other political issues of the day.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll is considered by some to be a leading indicator of the president's approval rating, although it is important to note that polling results can vary widely and should be viewed with caution.
To know more about Rasmussen Reports here
https://brainly.com/question/13950778
#SPJ4
What is one important difference between a sublease and a lease assignment?A. In an assignment, responsibility for the original lease is transferred completely to the assignee.B. In a sublease, the original tenant retains primary responsibility for performance of the original lease contract.C. A sublease does not convey any of the leasehold interest.D. A sublease conveys the entire leasehold interest.
The first important difference between a sublease and an assignment is that in an assignment, responsibility for the original lease is completely transferred to the assignee.
This means that the assignee takes on all rights and obligations under the original lease contract and the original tenant has no further responsibility for fulfillment of the lease. In a sublease, on the other hand, the original tenant retains primary responsibility for performance of the original lease contract.
This means that the original tenant still has some responsibility for fulfillment of the lease, even after subleasing the right to occupy the property to another tenant.
To know more about lease contract go to
https://brainly.com/question/29380983
#SPJ4
which of the following situations is not one of the six situations in which a warrantless search is valid?
Therefore, a situation that is not one of the six is likely to involve a circumstance that does not fall under any of the above categories.
What is a warrantless search?Generally, A warrantless search is a search conducted by law enforcement without the need for a valid search warrant. The power of a warrantless search is usually based on the concept of implied or apparent consent, or on the existence of exigent circumstances. Examples of warrantless searches include searches incident to arrest, searches of items in plain view, and emergency searches.
speaking, the six situations in which a warrantless search might be considered valid are:
Incident to a lawful arrestStop and friskPlain viewConsentAutomobile searchesEmergency searchesRead more about warrantless search
https://brainly.com/question/140436
#SPJ1
What Is the Fundamental Attribution Error?
The fundamental attribution fallacy is the propensity for an individual to attribute another's behaviour to their personality or character while attributing their own to situational elements beyond their control.
In other words, you tend to be forgiving of yourself while being completely unforgiving of others. For instance, if you've ever criticised a "lazy employee" for arriving late to a meeting and then proceeded to find an explanation for your own tardiness the next day, you've committed the basic attribution error. Because of the way that individuals see the world, the basic attribution error exists. You typically don't know everything that's going on with someone else, even though you have at least a general understanding of your personality, goals, and external circumstances that influence your day-to-day.
Learn more about personality here:
https://brainly.com/question/30167357
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about the Supreme Court is correct?
1. The supreme court must put all cases on the docket (calendar) if they were tried by the highest courts in a state.
2. The supreme court has the right to decide which cases it will put on the docket(calendar).
3.The supreme court must put all cases on the docket(calendar) if there was no verdict made during the trial.
4. The supreme court must put all cases on the docket(calendar) if it was tried in the lowest courts.
The correct statement about the Supreme Court is option 2: The Supreme Court has the right to decide which cases it will put on the docket or calendar.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it has the power to review and overturn decisions made by lower courts. However, the Court does not have to hear every case that is appealed to it. Instead, the Court can choose which cases to take on based on a variety of factors, such as the importance of the legal issue at hand, the level of controversy surrounding the case, and whether there are conflicting decisions from lower courts that need to be resolved. The process of selecting cases to hear is an important part of the Supreme Court's role in interpreting the Constitution and ensuring the fair and consistent application of the law.To know more about supreme court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30446176
#SPJ1
when a party wishes to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason, the party may exercise a:
When a party wishes to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason, the party may exercise a peremptory challenge. This is a special type of challenge that allows a party to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason and without the approval of the other party or the court.
This type of challenge allows a party to remove a potential juror from the pool without any reason or explanation; it is a "challenger for cause" that does not require the party to meet a burden of proof or demonstrate cause for the challenge.
In a civil case, each side may exercise a limited number of peremptory challenges; in criminal cases, the state gets a limited number of peremptory challenges and the defendant gets an unlimited number of peremptory challenges.
To know more about peremptory challenge go to
https://brainly.com/question/30655221
#SPJ4
true/false. in a federal system, governmental responsibilities are group of answer choices carried out by private corporations. the sole responsibility of the federal government shared by both state and federal authorities under the complete authority of the state governments.
False. In a federal system, governmental responsibilities are carried out by public institutions, not private corporations. The responsibilities are divided between the federal and state governments, with some shared authority, but the ultimate authority of the federal government is guaranteed by the Constitution.
How do state governments and federal authorities share responsibility in a federal system?In a federal system of government, state governments and federal authorities share responsibility for governance and decision-making. This division of powers is enshrined in the constitution and sets out the roles and responsibilities of each level of government. Generally, state governments are responsible for issues that affect their respective states, such as education, public health, and transportation, while the federal government has responsibility for issues that affect the entire country, such as defense, foreign policy, and trade. However, there is often overlap between the two levels of government, and some responsibilities are shared. For example, both state and federal authorities may be responsible for enforcing environmental regulations or ensuring compliance with labor laws. This sharing of responsibilities can sometimes lead to tensions or conflicts between the different levels of government.
To know more about Federal Government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ1
What was one of the original goals of the First Amendment?
The First Amendment declared that the government could not establish a state religion or impose excessive limitations on religious practice, but rather that it must respect people's freedom to exercise their faith as they see fit.
In 1789, the United States' first amendment came into existence. Even today, it protects citizens' rights to freedom of expression, of the press, of religion, of peaceful assembly, and of petitioning the government to make their complaints heard.
Religion, speech, the press, the right to petition, and the freedom to assemble are five important social values that are protected by the First Amendment of our Constitution. Our steadfast dedication to these ideals has endured challenging conflicts throughout our history and has remained a cornerstone.
To know more about the first amendment, refer to the:
https://brainly.com/question/6501700
#SPJ4
what are the penalties for driving without a license or with a suspended or revoked license?
The penalties for driving without a license or with a suspended or revoked license can vary depending on the state or jurisdiction where the offense occurs.
Driving without a licence or with a suspended or revoked licence has different punishments depending on the state or jurisdiction where the incident occurs. Nonetheless, the following are some examples of common fines that may be imposed:
Fines: A driver who is discovered driving without a licence or with a suspended or revoked licence may face a punishment that ranges from hundreds to thousands of dollars depending on the jurisdiction and the precise circumstances of the incident.
License Suspension or Revocation: Depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the act, a driver who is caught driving without a licence or with a suspended or revoked licence may have their licence suspended or revoked for a length of time.
For such more question on license:
https://brainly.com/question/29106760
#SPJ4
What is universe law?
In the fields of law and ethics, the terms "universal law" or "universal principle" refer to ideas of legal legitimacy, whereby the principles and regulations governing human behaviour.
They are most universal in their acceptance, their applicability, their translation, and their philosophical foundation are therefore regarded as the most legitimate. There is a significant universal law that, if followed carefully, can help in resolving problems involving human actions. However, even though this universal law has remained constant over time, partial application without full comprehension has resulted in many failures in dealing with problems involving humanity. The Universal Law of Human Functioning is this law. "HUMAN FUNCTIONALITY IS EQUAL TO ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE AND THE APPLICATION OF THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, IF OTHER CONDITIONS REMAIN CONSTANT" states the universal law of human functionality.
Learn more about functionality here:
https://brainly.com/question/30553767
#SPJ4
what is the vast majority of american law enforcement agencies?
The majority of the nearly 19,000 law enforcement organisations in the US are state and municipal, and local police departments, which employ around 650,000 officers, account for the vast majority of law enforcement personnel.
Who is the main law enforcement organisation?The main goal of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) is to help the law enforcement authorities in the states and union territories uphold law and order and quell insurrection.
Why are there so many law enforcement organisations in the US?As each level of government has an own enforcement organisation. You have town, county, state, and federal government as you move up. Each of these is autonomous, and many of their chief executives are chosen by the public.
To know more about federal government, visit:
brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ1
Which group does not have their own standard form construction contracts?
A. American Institute of Architects (AIA)
B. Associated General Contractors of America (AGC)
C. American Institute of Constructions (AIC)
D. The Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC)
The American Institute of Construction or the AIC do not have their own standard form of the construction contracts.
The correct option is option C.
A construction contract is basically a contract which is specifically negotiated for the purpose of construction of a particular asset or a combination of a few assets which are closely interrelated or are interdependent in the terms of their design, function, technology or their purpose or use.
A construction contract can possibly be negotiated for the construction of a single asset for example, a building, a bridge, a road, a dam etc. The American Institute of Construction do not have their own standard form of the construction contracts.
To know more about construction contract
https://brainly.com/question/15276606
#SPJ4
which of the following best characterizes the policy of the national government toward indigenous americans during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries?
US efforts to isolate Native Americans on reservations were stepped up due to political, economic, and even humanitarian considerations.
Which of the following best encapsulates American attitudes toward equality?Few Americans support the concept of equality of results, while the majority support it in terms of political equality and equality of opportunity.
What impact did the construction of new railroads have on the West's native population?Ecosystems were significantly impacted by the Transcontinental Railroad. For instance, it attracted a large number of hunters who killed the bison on which Native Americans depended. The situation in Cheyenne was unique. Intertribal trading on the Plains was hampered by the railroad, which also destroyed a crucial component of Cheyenne economic life.
To know more about Americans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2600449
#SPJ1
authoritarian constitutional and what type of government
An authoritarian constitutional government is a type of government in which the constitution outlines a framework for the exercise of power by the government, but the government's actions are heavily centralized and often lack democratic principles.
In this form of government, power is typically concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small group of leaders who exercise strong control over political, economic, and social affairs.
While the government operates within the framework of a constitution, individual rights and liberties may be restricted or ignored, and the rule of law may be subverted in favor of the government's interests.
This type of government is often associated with countries where there are weak institutions, a lack of accountability, and limited political competition. Examples of authoritarian constitutional governments include Russia, China, and Iran.
In these countries, the constitution provides a framework for government action, but the government often operates in ways that are not transparent, democratic, or accountable.
To know more about authoritarian constitutional government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
what is the punishment for crossing the border illegally
The punishment for illegally crossing a border varies depending on the country, the circumstances, and the individual's crime history.
Those who are caught trying to cross the border illegally usually face deportation, fines, and sometimes even jail time. Illegal entry is a misdemeanour in the United States, punishable by a fine of up to $250 and up to six months in jail for a first conviction.
The punishment for entering the United States illegally and without proper documentation is up to two years in prison. A lifetime ban from entering the country may also follow a conviction for illegal entry.
However, those who attempt to enter a foreign nation without authorization or the required documentation risk being arrested and possibly imprisoned. Lastly, attempting to obtain future visas or being denied admission are further penalties for unauthorised border crossing.
Complete Question:
What is the punishment for illegally crossing a border?
To learn more about crime visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13143195
#SPJ4
what the one issue you are addressing as the od practitioner recall?
The organization's staff training programme is one of the main challenges at hand. Employee productivity and efficiency increase with training.
By implementing innovative training techniques, the OD practitioner aids the organisation by assisting in the improvement of employees' skill sets, which is advantageous to the business. The effects of a recent change in the company's procedures or organisational structure are another problem that an OD petitioner must address. The new strategy will be examined by OD professionals, who will also gather data about it, compile a report, and then submit it.
Those tasked with implementing the firm's preplanned changes are organisational development practitioners. By implementing appropriate adjustments to the current system that will be highly effective, they play a significant part in the development of an organisation. About the problems the company is facing, they engage with other specialists there and come up with a workable plan for change.
To know more about OD practitioner, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30265271
#SPJ4
Which of the following powers is NOT explicitly given to Congress by the Constitution? a. the power to impeach the President b. the power to regulate commerce among the states c. the power to extradite a person accused of a crime from one state to another d. the power
The power to impeach the President is not explicitly given to Congress under the Constitution.
The correct option is A.
According to the Constitution, Congress has the power to oust the President, Vice President, and all federal civil servants for treason, bribery, or other serious offences.
This technique was brought over from English practice, where Parliament impeached and found guilty ministers and Crown favorites in an effort to check the Monarch's power.
The Framers of the Constitution understood the impeachment power of Congress as a critical instrument for holding government officials accountable for legal infractions and abuses of power.
It serves as a significant check on the Executive and Judicial Branches.
All federal are liable to removal via impeachment, but the President and federal judges have been the targets of most notable use of the instrument by Congress.
To know more about the impeachment process, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11542266
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Which of the following powers is NOT explicitly given to Congress by the Constitution?
a. the power to impeach the president
b. the power to regulate commerce among the states
c. the power to extradite a person accused of a crime from one state to another
d. the power to confirm the president's nominee to fill a vacancy in the vice-presidency
What branch can refuse to confirm judicial appointments?
The senate can refuse to confirm judicial appointments. It is the upper chamber of the United States Congress.
Being the upper chamber of Congress the Senate has many powers of advice and consent which are unique. The power includes the approval of treaties and the confirmation of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges including Federal Supreme Court justices, flag officers, regulatory officials, ambassadors and other federal executive officials and federal uniformed officers. If anyone not receives a majority of electors for vice president then the duty falls to the Senate to elect one of the top two recipients of electors for that office. The Senate has been considered as both deliberative and prestigious body than the House of representatives due to the longer terms it has and smaller size and statewide constituencies which historically led to a more collegial and less partisan atmosphere.
To learn more about Senate
https://brainly.com/question/29790817
#SPJ4
What is the burden of proof?
The responsibility to provide evidence to support your claims, such as when you are accusing someone of a crime. This prosecution has the burden of proof.
The legal illustration the innocence of those accused of crimes is assumed. It is the prosecutor's responsibility to provide evidence that they are guilty. The accuser is not required to provide any evidence. Innocent until proven guilty is the presumption that applies if the prosecution fails to achieve its burden of proof. One side in a legal disagreement has the duty of proving their case, whereas the other side has no such burden and is assumed to be right. The burden of proof demands a party to present proof to demonstrate the veracity of the facts necessary to substantiate the necessary legal requirements for the dispute. Determining who is in charge of presenting evidence that supports or refutes a claim is a requirement under the law. It also establishes how much proof is required to reach that objective. The law compels you to present sufficient proof to substantiate your allegations if your side is the one with the burden of proof.
Learn more about burden of proof here:
https://brainly.com/question/12960124
#SPJ4
Describe the three different tax rates discussed in the chapter and how taxpayers might use them.
-Marginal Tax Rate
-Average Tax Rate
-Effective Tax Rate
The three different tax rates discussed in the chapter are Marginal Tax Rate, Average Tax Rate, and Effective Tax Rate.
The tax rate is the percentage at that a trade or character is burdened. There are various procedures used to present a tax rate: sanctioned, average, slight, and productive. These rates can too convene utilizing various definitions used for a tax base: all-embracing and restricted.
A elector's average tax rate (or active tax rate) is the share of profit that they pay in taxes. By contrast, a person native of country's slight tax rate is the tax rate set on their last currency of salary. Taxpayers' average tax rates are lower — ordinarily much lower — than their borderline rates.
To know more about tax rates refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29557982
#SPJ4
True/False? in general, courts will not enforce a contract in which the offer states that the offeree’s failure to respond will be considered an acceptance of the offer.
False. As long as certain requirements are satisfied, courts will often uphold a contract where the offer specifies that the offeree's failure to react would be deemed an acceptance of the offer.
Only in specific situations can courts uphold a contract if the offer specifies that the offeree's failure to react would be deemed an acceptance of the offer. The term "mailbox rule" or "silence is acceptance" rule is used to describe this kind of contract clause. The setting of the transaction, the nature of the connection between the parties, and the wording of the contract are just a few of the variables that might affect whether or not the rule is enforceable. In rare circumstances, the offeror might need to go farther to make sure the offeree has received and comprehends the offer's conditions. In the end, the particular facts and circumstances of the case will determine whether or not such a contract clause is enforceable.
learn more about courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
What does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act require about financial statements of all public companies?
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act demands that the administration of public parties evaluate the influence of the within the control of issuers for commercial newsgathering.
Section 404(b) demands a candidly-held association's bookkeeper to ideas, and report on, the administration's evaluation of allure within controls. The Sarbanes Oxley Act demands all monetary reports to contain an Internal Controls Report. This shows that an association's fiscal dossier is correct and able controls are working to safeguard the commercial dossier. Year-end financial disclosure reports are again a necessity.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act focuses on organizing commercial and verifying regions. This Act guarantees the security of the financiers' interests. But this Act does not have a connection with explaining sound allied government.
To know more about Sarbanes Oxley Act refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29336194
#SPJ4
In general, courts will not enforce a contract in which the offer states that the offeree's failure to respond will be considered an acceptance of the offer. True or False
Generally speaking, a contract in which the offer specifies that the offeree's refusal to react shall be deemed an acceptance shall not be enforced in court.
What does deeming mean in law?
Generally speaking, if an offer specifies that the offeree's failure to react shall be deemed an acceptance, a court will not enforce the contract.
The procedure through which another person's income and/or resources are taken into account in order to determine if an SSI claimant's (or recipient's) basic need for food and shelter may be satisfied is known by the Social Security Administration as "deeming."
Acting against the law or in defiance of it is not lawful since it is not permitted by law or justified by it. a possessor acting illegally.
Know more about speaking Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28735583
#SPJ1
What major political party is described as more “to the right” or conservative?
Answer:
Republican
Explanation:
An example of a Republican would be Donald Trump
What's the meaning of The Free Exercise Clause ?
Answer:
The Free Exercise Clause is a clause in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution that states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". This clause protects the right of individuals to practice the religion of their choosing without fear of government interference.
Who is responsible for on-scene safety of EMS providers?
A) Traffic director
B) Law enforcement
C) All crew members
D) Triage officer
All the crew members are responsible for on-scene safety of EMS providers.
Hence, the correct answer is C.
EMS or the Emergency Medical Services are medical experts whose main responsibility is to Respond to 911 calls for emergency medical assistance, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or bandaging a wound, to evaluate a patient's condition and determine a course of treatment, provide first-aid treatment or life support care to sick or injured patients, and transport patients safely in an ambulance. The EMS acts as a live saver and it is the responsibility of the on-scene safety of EMS providers is handed over to all the crew members. The EMS is supported by few of the major parts such as the Emergency Medical Responder (EMR), Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) and Advanced-EMT (AEMT).
Know more about "Emergency Medical Services" visit
brainly.com/question/17257100
#SPJ4
identify one true statement about the nondelegable obligations under the agency law: .
Delegation of authority is not permitted in contracts that require a principal to fulfill personally, which is one fact relating to the agency law's non-delegable requirements.
What are non-delegable obligations?The term "nondelegable obligation" (also known as "non-delegable duty") refers to a legal obligation or duty that cannot legally be assigned or if assigned, for which the principal is still liable.
They are also referred to as non-assignable obligations or duties.
The nondelegable responsibility doctrine deals with an affirmative obligation imposed because of a person's or an entity's connections to others.
The assignment of such a duty to an independent contractor cannot prevent it.
One fact regarding the agency law's non-delegable requirements is that delegation of authority is not allowed in contracts that call for a principal's personal performance.
Therefore, a delegation of authority is not permitted in contracts that require a principal to fulfill personally, which is one fact relating to the agency law's non-delegable requirements.
Know more about non-delegable obligations here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403793
#SPJ1
Correct question:
Identify ONE true statement about the non-delegable obligations under the agency law: ______________.
what is restricted from higher speed roadways
Certain types of vehicles and certain types of cargo are restricted from higher speed roadways. For example, in the United States, large commercial trucks carrying hazardous materials are generally not allowed on roads with a speed limit of 60 MPH or greater.
The primary legal restriction on higher speed roadways, generally defined as "limited access highways," is that the use of these roadways is restricted to motorized vehicles. High-speed roadways also generally do not allow animals or pedestrians on them, and often have restrictions on bicycle traffic as well. In general, high-speed roadways are reserved exclusively for motor vehicles that are traveling at relatively high speeds.
In certain instances, however, it may be legal to operate a bicycle or a tractor on higher speed roadways, but only if this is permitted by the traffic control devices at the entry points to the roadway.
To know more about traffic control go to
https://brainly.com/question/16999226
#SPJ4
