The Cournot equilibrium price (po) is higher than the competitive equilibrium price (p). In the given scenario, two profit-maximizing oligopolists, Firm 1 and Firm 2, simultaneously set their production levels. Each firm's cost function is represented by C(y) = 2y, where y represents the production level. The market demand function is given by Y = 20 - Pe, where Pe denotes the price of unit electricity.
To determine the optimal levels of production (yo and y), we need to solve the profit maximization problems for both firms. Firm 1's profit maximization problem can be expressed as max p(Y)₁ - C(y₁) = (20 - 1 - 9₂) y₁ - 2y₁. By differentiating the profit function with respect to y₁, we can find the marginal revenue (MR₁). Setting MR₁ equal to the marginal cost (MC(y) = 2y₁), we obtain 20 - 2₁ - 3/2 = 2y₁. Solving this equation, we find y₁ = 9/2.
Similarly, Firm 2's profit maximization problem can be expressed as max p(Y)₂ - C(y₂) = (20 - 1 - 9₁) y₂ - 2y₂. By differentiating the profit function with respect to y₂, we can find the marginal revenue (MR₂). Setting MR₂ equal to the marginal cost (MC(32) = 2y₂), we obtain 20 - ₁ - 2/2 = 2y₂. Solving this equation, we find y₂ = 9/4.
Thus, the Cournot equilibrium production levels are yo = 9/2 and y = 9/4. The total production in the market is given by YC = yo + y = 12. Substituting this value into the market demand function, we find pCo = 20 - YC = 8.
In a competitive equilibrium, the price is determined by the marginal cost, which in this case is p = MC = 2. Comparing the Cournot equilibrium price (pCo = 8) with the competitive equilibrium price (p = 2), we can conclude that the Cournot equilibrium price is higher than the competitive equilibrium price.
In summary, the Cournot equilibrium occurs when both firms choose their production levels simultaneously, resulting in a higher equilibrium price compared to the competitive equilibrium. This demonstrates the strategic interdependence between oligopolistic firms and the impact it has on market outcomes.
Learn more about Cournot equilibrium
brainly.com/question/31043176
#SPJ11
In a "Projectized" organization: each project manager has full line authority so there is unity of command. a scope of work contract must be written. all stakeholders must be identified. relevant issues must be described in the project charter.
In a "Projectized" organization, each project manager has full line authority, ensuring unity of command and accountability.
In a "Projectized" organization, each project manager is given full line authority, which means they have complete control and responsibility over their respective projects. This authority enables efficient decision-making and streamlined communication within the project team.
With full line authority, project managers have the power to make important decisions regarding project planning, resource allocation, and task assignments, without the need for constant approval from higher-level management.
To ensure clarity and alignment, a scope of work contract must be written for each project. This contract outlines the project objectives, deliverables, timelines, and any specific requirements or constraints. It serves as a formal agreement between the project manager and the stakeholders, clearly defining the project's scope and setting expectations for all parties involved.
In addition, identifying all stakeholders is crucial in a projectized organization. Stakeholders are individuals or groups who have a vested interest in the project or are affected by its outcomes.
By identifying all relevant stakeholders, project managers can effectively engage and communicate with them throughout the project lifecycle. This ensures that their needs and expectations are considered, leading to increased stakeholder satisfaction and successful project outcomes.
Learn more about Projectized
brainly.com/question/33052941
#SPJ11
Payments you could have received for renting out an office attached to your home instead of using it to start your dog-sitting business are a?
Group of answer choices
a. explicit cost.
b. pure economic cost.
c. implicit cost.
d. accounting cost.
Option (c) implicit cost is the correct answer. The payments you could have received for renting out an office attached to your home instead of using it to start your dog-sitting business are an implicit cost.
Implicit costs refer to the opportunity cost of using a resource for a particular purpose, which means the value of the best alternative forgone. In this case, if you had rented out the office, you would have earned some income, which represents the opportunity cost of starting a dog-sitting business in that office. This opportunity cost is not a direct and measurable expense, but rather an indirect cost associated with the forgone business opportunity.
Explicit costs, on the other hand, are costs that involve direct monetary payments, such as wages, rent, and utilities. Accounting costs only consider explicit costs, while pure economic costs include both explicit and implicit costs.
Therefore, option (c) implicit cost is the correct answer.
learn more about implicit cost here
https://brainly.com/question/30433825
#SPJ11
Which of the following taxpayers will pay income tax up to 50% ( but no more) of their sopcial security benifits
A. Jordan, a nondependant taxpayer filing, whose whose modified AGI plus one-half of is net social security benefits?
B. Georgia, who file HOH, and whose modified AGI plus one half of her net social secuyrity benefits is $25,000
C. Clive, who hasn't been been able to locate his wife in three years, files MFS, and whose modified AGA plus one halfof his social net social security benefits is $30,000
D. Andrea who files MFJ and whose AGI plus one_half of her SSB is $44,001.
A. Jordan will pay income tax up to 50% of their Social Security benefits.B. Georgia will not pay income tax up to 50% of her Social Security benefits.
C.will not pay income tax up to 50% of his Social Security benefits.D. Andrea will pay income tax up to 50% of her Social Security benefits.
A. Jordan's situation is not specified, so it is not possible to determine if they will pay income tax up to 50% of their Social Security benefits.
B. Georgia, who files as Head of Household (HOH) with a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) plus one-half of her net Social Security benefits totaling $25,000, will not pay income tax up to 50% of her Social Security benefits. This is because her MAGI does not exceed the threshold for that tax rate.
C. Clive, who files as Married Filing Separately (MFS) and has a MAGI plus one-half of his net Social Security benefits totaling $30,000, will not pay income tax up to 50% of his Social Security benefits. This is because his MAGI does not exceed the threshold for that tax rate.
D. Andrea, who files as Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) and has an adjusted gross income (AGI) plus one-half of her Social Security benefits totaling $44,001, will pay income tax up to 50% of her Social Security benefits. This is because her AGI exceeds the threshold for that tax rate.
To summarize, only Andrea ( D) will pay income tax up to 50% of her Social Security benefits based on the provided information.
Learn more about Income here:
https://brainly.com/question/14732695
#SPJ11
There are several models to capture the relation between risk and returnWhat is the only risk factor in CAPM? We also talk about the APT (arbitrage pricing theory), can you name factors in an APT model ? Which model is more comprehensive your opinion?
The only risk factor considered in the CAPM is the systematic risk, represented by beta (β). The APT allows for multiple factors to influence asset returns, which can include interest rate changes, inflation rates, economic growth rates, and more. In my opinion, the APT is more comprehensive.
In the CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model), the only risk factor considered is the market risk, which is represented by the systematic risk measured by beta (β).
The CAPM assumes that the return on an asset is determined solely by its exposure to the overall market risk.
On the other hand, the APT (Arbitrage Pricing Theory) allows for multiple risk factors to influence asset returns. The specific factors in an APT model can vary depending on the analysis and the asset being evaluated.
Some common factors used in APT models include interest rate changes, inflation rates, economic growth rates, industry-specific variables, and company-specific variables.
As for which model is more comprehensive, it depends on the context and purpose of the analysis. The CAPM is a widely used and simpler model that provides a single-factor relationship between risk and return.
It is commonly applied to estimate the expected return on an asset based on its beta. However, the APT offers a more flexible framework by considering multiple factors that can potentially influence asset returns.
The APT allows for a more comprehensive analysis by incorporating a broader range of risk factors that may affect the performance of assets.
Ultimately, the choice between the CAPM and APT depends on the specific requirements of the analysis, the availability of data, and the nature of the assets being evaluated.
Both models have their merits and limitations, and the selection should be based on the specific context and objectives of the analysis.
Learn more about systemic risk here:
https://brainly.com/question/17217337
#SPJ11
Suppose good X and good Y are perfect complements to each other. The kinks of indifference curves are along the y=2x straight line. The consumer has a wealth level of 12 . The price of goodX is $2 and the price of good Y is $1. What is the consumer's utility maximization market basket?
The utility maximization market basket is (3, 6), where the consumer consumes 3 units of good X and 6 units of good Y, spending their entire budget of $12.
Since goods X and Y are perfect complements to each other, the consumer will always consume them in fixed proportions. Let the quantity of good X consumed be denoted by x, and the quantity of good Y consumed be denoted by y.
The kinks of indifference curves along the y=2x straight line indicate that the consumer will consume 2 units of good Y for every unit of good X consumed. Therefore, we can write y = 2x.
The budget constraint is given by 2x + y = 12 (since the price of good X is $2 and the price of good Y is $1, and the consumer's wealth level is $12).
Substituting y = 2x into the budget constraint, we get:
2x + 2x = 12
4x = 12
x = 3
Therefore, the consumer will consume 3 units of good X, and since y = 2x, the consumer will also consume 6 units of good Y.
So, the utility maximization market basket is (3, 6), where the consumer consumes 3 units of good X and 6 units of good Y, spending their entire budget of $12.
learn more about utility maximization here
https://brainly.com/question/32296953
#SPJ11
The Earth is a rotating body that has gravity. Does the Earth have any of the effects we discussed for black holes such as gravitational redshifts, frame dragging (discussed in the book), or gravitational time dilation? How are the Earth and a black hole alike and how are they different?
(book used is Foundations of Modern Cosmology second edition)
the Earth exhibits some of the effects discussed for black holes, including gravitational redshifts and gravitational time dilation, but not frame dragging. although to a much smaller extent.
Gravitational time dilation refers to the slowing down of time in a strong gravitational field. This effect is also observed near black holes and is present on Earth, though the difference in gravitational field strength is much smaller compared to black holes. Frame dragging, on the other hand, is a unique effect associated with rotating black holes. It refers to the distortion of spacetime caused by the rotating mass, which "drags" nearby objects and influences their motion. This effect is not observed on Earth. In summary, while the Earth and black holes share certain gravitational effects like redshift and time dilation, frame dragging is a distinct characteristic of rotating black holes that does not apply to Earth.
Learn more about objects and influences here:
https://brainly.com/question/32295670
#SPJ11
Your firm currently has net working capital of $100,000 that it expects to grow at a rate of 4% per year forever. You are considering some suggestions that could slow that growth to 3% per year. If your discount rate is 12%, how would these changes impact the value of your firm?
Reducing the growth rate from 4% to 3% per year would decrease the value of the firm from $50,000 to $33,333, resulting in a decrease of $16,667.
To determine the impact of slowing the growth rate of net working capital from 4% to 3% per year on the value of the firm, we can use the perpetuity formula.
The perpetuity formula calculates the present value of a constant stream of cash flows.
The present value of the perpetuity can be calculated as follows:
PV = CF / (r - g),
where PV is the present value, CF is the cash flow, r is the discount rate, and g is the growth rate.
In this case, the initial net working capital is $100,000. At a growth rate of 4%, the cash flow is expected to be $4,000 per year ($100,000 * 4%). At a discount rate of 12%, the present value of the perpetuity is:
PV = $4,000 / (0.12 - 0.04) = $4,000 / 0.08 = $50,000.
If the growth rate is reduced to 3%, the cash flow becomes $3,000 per year ($100,000 * 3%). Plugging this value into the formula, we find:
PV = $3,000 / (0.12 - 0.03) = $3,000 / 0.09 = $33,333.
Therefore, reducing the growth rate from 4% to 3% per year would decrease the value of the firm from $50,000 to $33,333, resulting in a decrease of $16,667.
For more such questions on growth,click on
https://brainly.com/question/24841216
#SPJ8
Sonder Inc. is producing its cost of sales budget. Direct materials are budgeted to be 60% of sales value. However, due to the expansion of the company in the recent past, suppliers are giving Sonder Inc. a 2% discount on all purchases of direct materials by the firm. Budgeted sales for January 2020 are expected to be £200,000 and to rise by £10,000 a month in the budget year up to December 2020 . Direct labour is expected to amount to 10% of sales value and variable overhead is budgeted to be 5% of direct labour cost. What is the budgeted cost of sales (direct materials + direct labour + variable overhead) figure that will appear in the budgeted monthly statement of profit or loss for June 2020?
The budgeted cost of sales for June 2020, which includes direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead, can be calculated as follows:
Budgeted Sales for June 2020:
Given that the budgeted sales for January 2020 are £200,000 and are expected to rise by £10,000 per month, we can calculate the budgeted sales for June 2020 as follows:
Budgeted Sales for June 2020 = Budgeted Sales for January 2020 + (5 months * £10,000)
= £200,000 + (£10,000 * 5)
= £250,000
Direct Materials:
Direct materials are budgeted to be 60% of sales value. However, Sonder Inc. receives a 2% discount on all purchases of direct materials. To calculate the budgeted cost of direct materials for June 2020:
Budgeted Cost of Direct Materials for June 2020 = Budgeted Sales for June 2020 * (1 - Discount) * Direct Materials Percentage
= £250,000 * (1 - 0.02) * 0.60
= £150,000
Direct Labor:
Direct labor is expected to amount to 10% of sales value. To calculate the budgeted cost of direct labor for June 2020:
Budgeted Cost of Direct Labor for June 2020 = Budgeted Sales for June 2020 * Direct Labor Percentage
= £250,000 * 0.10
= £25,000
Variable Overhead:
Variable overhead is budgeted to be 5% of direct labor cost. To calculate the budgeted variable overhead for June 2020:
Budgeted Variable Overhead for June 2020 = Budgeted Cost of Direct Labor for June 2020 * Variable Overhead Percentage
= £25,000 * 0.05
= £1,250
Therefore, the budgeted cost of sales (direct materials + direct labor + variable overhead) that will appear in the budgeted monthly statement of profit or loss for June 2020 is:
Budgeted Cost of Sales for June 2020 = Budgeted Cost of Direct Materials for June 2020 + Budgeted Cost of Direct Labor for June 2020 + Budgeted Variable Overhead for June 2020
= £150,000 + £25,000 + £1,250
= £176,250.
Know more about Budgeted here :
https://brainly.com/question/31952035
#SPJ11
what is home depot overall structure. Is this hierarchical,
matrixed, networked, flat?
The Home Depot has a hierarchical organizational structure. As one of the world's largest home improvement retailers, it follows a traditional hierarchical model that is common in large corporations.
In this structure, authority and decision-making flow from top-level executives down through various management levels to front-line employees.
At the top of the hierarchy is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) who oversees the overall strategic direction and major decision-making for the company. The CEO is supported by a team of top-level executives responsible for different functional areas such as operations, merchandising, finance, and human resources.
Below the top-level executives, there are multiple management levels that include regional managers, district managers, store managers, and department supervisors. Each level has a defined scope of responsibility and reports to the level above them. These managers are responsible for overseeing the operations, sales, and customer service in their respective areas.
Front-line employees, such as sales associates and customer service representatives, form the base of the hierarchy and report to their respective supervisors or managers.
Overall, Home Depot's hierarchical structure ensures clear lines of authority, accountability, and decision-making within the organization. It supports efficient coordination, communication, and management of its vast retail operations.
Learn more about retailers here
https://brainly.com/question/29560034
#SPJ11
1. Consider a risky portfolio. The end-of-the-year cash flow derived from the portfolio will be either $70,000 or $200,000 with equal probabilities of 0.5. The alternative risk-free investment in T-bills pays 6 percent per year. a) If you require a risk premium of 8%, how much will you be willing to pay for the portfolio? b) Suppose that the portfolio can be purchased for the amount you found in (a). What will be the expected rate of return on the portfolio? c) Now suppose that you require a risk premium of 12%. What is the price that you will be willing to pay?
a) RR = 14% is the rate of return that would reimburse the investor for the risk.
Expected value is: E(X) = 0.5($70,000) + 0.5($200,000) = $135,000
Let R be the rate of return the investor will get on the portfolio. Then we have: R = (cash flow) / price = $135,000 / P
Thus, P = $135,000 / R
The investor's required rate of return is: RRF = 6% + 8% = 14%
The risk premium is 8%. So the rate of return that would compensate the investor for the risk is:
RR = 14%
b) Expected value is: E(X) = 0.5($70,000) + 0.5($200,000) = $135,000
Let R be the rate of return the investor will get on the portfolio. Then we have:
R = (cash flow) / price
= $135,000 / P
Thus, P = $135,000 / R
The price that the investor will be willing to pay is: P = $135,000 / 0.14 = $964,285.71
c) Expected value is: E(X) = 0.5($70,000) + 0.5($200,000) = $135,000
Let R be the rate of return the investor will get on the portfolio. Then we have:
R = (cash flow) / price = $135,000 / P
Thus, P = $135,000 / R
The investor's required rate of return is: RRF = 6% + 12% = 18%
The risk premium is 12%. So the rate of return that would compensate the investor for the risk is:
RR = 18%
Thus, the price that the investor will be willing to pay is: P = $135,000 / 0.18 = $750,000.
Learn more about risk premium: https://brainly.com/question/28235630
#SPJ11
Outline how you would respond to customers if you were managing
Polyphony Digital
As the manager of Polyphony Digital, a renowned video game development company, my goal would be to provide exceptional customer service and ensure customer satisfaction.
Here is an outline of how I would respond to customers:
1. Prompt and Courteous Communication:
- Respond to customer inquiries, feedback, and issues in a timely manner.
- Use a friendly and professional tone in all interactions, whether it's through email, social media, or customer support channels.
2. Active Listening and Empathy:
- Listen attentively to customers' concerns and frustrations.
- Show empathy and understanding towards their experiences and emotions.
- Acknowledge their feedback and assure them that their opinions are valued.
3. Transparent and Clear Information:
- Provide accurate and transparent information regarding game updates, bug fixes, and new releases.
- Clearly communicate any known issues, workarounds, or upcoming features to manage customer expectations.
4. Problem Resolution:
- Investigate and troubleshoot customer issues promptly.
- Offer personalized solutions and guidance to address their specific problems.
- Collaborate with the development and support teams to find appropriate resolutions.
5. Compensation and Appreciation:
- Offer compensation or gestures of goodwill, such as in-game rewards or discounts, for customers who have experienced significant issues or inconveniences.
- Express gratitude for their loyalty and support.
- Consider organizing special events or contests to engage with the community and show appreciation.
6. Feedback and Community Engagement:
- Encourage customers to provide feedback on their experiences and suggestions for improvements.
- Actively participate in forums, social media discussions, and community platforms to engage with players and gather insights.
- Regularly update customers on development progress and involve them in shaping future updates through surveys or beta testing.
7. Continuous Improvement:
- Collect and analyze customer feedback and complaints to identify recurring issues and areas for improvement.
- Work closely with the development team to address technical challenges and enhance gameplay experiences.
- Strive for continuous improvement in game quality, user experience, and customer satisfaction.
By following these guidelines, I aim to create a positive and engaging relationship with customers, foster loyalty, and maintain the reputation of Polyphony Digital as a customer-focused company that values its players' experiences.
Learn more about compensation
https://brainly.com/question/28250225
#SPJ11
(2) M\&M typically adds or subtracts 3 percent- age points to the overall cost of capital to ad-just for risk. Should the new line be accepted?
Answer:
A thorough analysis of the project's cash flows, risk factors, and profitability measures is necessary to make an informed decision regarding the acceptance of the new line.
To determine whether the new line should be accepted, we need more information about the project's expected cash flows and the cost of capital. However, based on the given information that M&M typically adds or subtracts 3 percentage points to the overall cost of capital to adjust for risk, we can make some general observations.
Adding or subtracting percentage points to the overall cost of capital indicates an adjustment for risk. If M&M adds 3 percentage points to the cost of capital, it suggests that the project is considered riskier than the company's average investments. On the other hand, if M&M subtracts 3 percentage points, it implies that the project is perceived as less risky.
To evaluate whether the new line should be accepted, we need to compare the project's expected return (based on cash flows) to the adjusted cost of capital. If the expected return is higher than the adjusted cost of capital, it suggests that the project has the potential to generate returns that exceed the level of risk and may be worth pursuing. Conversely, if the expected return is lower than the adjusted cost of capital, it implies that the project may not be sufficiently profitable to justify the associated risk.
Ultimately, a thorough analysis of the project's cash flows, risk factors, and profitability measures is necessary to make an informed decision regarding the acceptance of the new line.
Learn more about profitability from below link
https://brainly.com/question/1078746
#SPJ11
The major problems caused by imperfect information in insurance markets are a. moral hazard and adverse selection. b. deceptive applicants and fraudulent claims c. ability to attract repeat customers and risk groups d. major additional costs and separating insurance buyers
The two major problems caused by imperfect information in insurance markets are moral hazard and adverse selection.
In the insurance industry, imperfect information can lead to several problems, but two major issues are moral hazard and adverse selection. The moral hazard refers to the situations in which the insured person, after getting insurance, can increase the likelihood of risk and may take more risks than before because the insurer is responsible for the damages or expenses. This type of behaviour can lead to an increase in the number of claims, which ultimately leads to higher premiums. Insurance companies protect themselves from moral hazards by increasing the premium and reducing the benefits provided to the customer.
Adverse selection is another problem caused by imperfect information. It is a situation in which a person with high risk is more likely to take insurance than someone with a lower risk. When people who have higher risk take insurance, they increase the likelihood of claims, which can ultimately lead to increased premiums for everyone. Insurance companies must determine which customers are more likely to make claims, and they need to charge higher premiums to those customers to ensure that they make enough profit.
Imperfect information in insurance markets can lead to two significant problems, moral hazard and adverse selection. Insurance companies must increase premiums to counteract these problems and protect themselves from higher claims and additional costs.
To know more about insurance markets visit
brainly.com/question/17052776
#SPJ11
explain how can an employer be liable for the wrongs committed by their employees? - 5 mark question (please write enough deatils for 5 marks)
- Please make reference to cases and statutory provisions where relevant.
- please answer asap as well
An employer can be held liable for the wrongs committed by their employees through the legal doctrine of vicarious liability.
This doctrine holds employers responsible for the actions of their employees if those actions were performed in the course of their employment. Vicarious liability is based on the principle that employers should bear the consequences of their employees' actions as they benefit from their work.
However, there are certain requirements that must be met to establish vicarious liability, such as a relationship of employment between the parties and the wrongful act being within the scope of employment.
Vicarious liability is a legal principle that holds employers liable for the actions of their employees if those actions were committed within the course of employment.
This doctrine is based on the idea that employers should bear the responsibility for the actions of their employees because they derive the benefits of their work. To establish vicarious liability, certain requirements must be met. First, there must be a relationship of employment between the employer and the employee.
This can be a contractual relationship or a relationship where the employer exercises control and supervision over the employee's work. Second, the wrongful act must have been committed within the scope of employment.
This means that the act must be related to the employee's authorized duties or actions reasonably incidental to those duties. If an employee commits a wrongful act while acting outside the scope of employment, the employer may not be held vicariously liable.
There have been various cases that have shaped the principles of vicarious liability. For example, in the case of Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001] UKHL 22, the House of Lords held that an employer could be vicariously liable for the sexual abuse committed by an employee.
Even though the acts were wholly unauthorized and personal to the employee. The court considered the close connection between the employee's job and the wrongful acts, as well as the fact that the employer had entrusted the employee with authority over vulnerable individuals.
In conclusion, an employer can be held liable for the wrongs committed by their employees through the doctrine of vicarious liability. This principle ensures that employers bear the consequences of their employees' actions, provided that the requirements of employment relationship and the act being within the scope of employment are satisfied.
Case law, such as the Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd case, has played a significant role in defining the principles of vicarious liability and establishing the scope of employer liability for the actions of their employees.
Learn more about vicarious liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/32967455
#SPJ11
Scenario: Assume two countries, A and B, with the same technologies, have the following aggregate production functions. Y₁ = AKVAH34 YB = AK25 HS Refer to the scenario above. Which of the following is likely to happen if the stock of physical capital increases by 20 percent and efficiency units of labor increase by 20 percent over the next 20 years in Country A? Output will increase by 10 percent. Output will increase by 20 percent. Output will increase by 5 percent. Output will remain constant.
If the stock of physical capital increases by 20 percent and efficiency units of labor increase by 20 percent over the next 20 years in Country A, the output is likely to increase by approximately 72.8 percent
The aggregate production function for Country A is given as Y₁ = AKVAH³⁴. If the stock of physical capital increases by 20 percent (K increases) and efficiency units of labor increase by 20 percent (A increases), we can analyze the impact on output.
Given that both K and A increase by 20 percent, we can express the new production function for Country A as Y₁' = (1.2K)(1.2A)V(1.2H)³⁴.
To determine the percentage change in output, we can compare the new production function to the original one: ((Y₁' - Y₁) / Y₁) * 100.
Substituting the values into the formula:
[tex]((Y₁' - Y₁) / Y₁) * 100 = (((1.2K)(1.2A)V(1.2H)³⁴ - AKVAH³⁴) / AKVAH³⁴) * 100.[/tex]
Simplifying further:
((1.728 - 1) / 1) * 100 = 72.8%.
Therefore, if the stock of physical capital increases by 20 percent and efficiency units of labor increase by 20 percent over the next 20 years in Country A, the output is likely to increase by approximately 72.8 percent.
learn more about stock here:
https://brainly.com/question/31940696
#SPJ11
Blossom Company issued $327,000, 8%, 15-year bonds on December 31, 2021, for $313,920. Interest is payable annually on December 31. Blossom uses the straight-line method to amortize bond premium or discount. Prepare the journal entries to record the following events. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.) (a) The issuance of the bonds. (b) The payment of interest and the discount amortization on December 31, 2022. (c) The redemption of the bonds at maturity, assuming interest for the last interest period has been paid and recorded. No. (a) (b) (c) Date Dec. 31, 2021 Dec. 31, 2022 Dec. 31, 2036 Account Titles and Explanation Debit 10 Cred
The journal entries for the events described are as follows:
(a) Dec. 31, 2021: Debit Cash $313,920 and Credit Bonds Payable $327,000 and Premium on Bonds Payable $13,080.
(b) Dec. 31, 2022: Debit Interest Expense $26,160, Premium on Bonds Payable $2,080, and Credit Cash $24,080.
(c) Dec. 31, 2036: Debit Bonds Payable $327,000, Premium on Bonds Payable $13,080, and Credit Cash $340,080.
Step 1: Journal Entry (a):
On December 31, 2021, when the bonds were issued, the company would debit Cash for the amount received, which is $313,920. The company would credit Bonds Payable for the face value of the bonds, which is $327,000, and the Premium on Bonds Payable account for the difference between the face value and the amount received, which is $13,080. This premium arises because the bonds were issued at a discount.
Step 2: Journal Entry (b):
On December 31, 2022, when the interest payment and discount amortization are due, the company would debit Interest Expense for the annual interest payment of $26,160. The company would also debit the Premium on Bonds Payable account for the amount of discount being amortized, which is $2,080. The corresponding credit would be made to Cash for the total payment of $24,080.
Step 3: Journal Entry (c):
On December 31, 2036, when the bonds are redeemed at maturity, assuming the last interest payment has been made, the company would debit Bonds Payable for the face value of $327,000 and the Premium on Bonds Payable for the remaining unamortized premium of $13,080. The corresponding credit would be made to Cash for the redemption amount of $340,080.
These journal entries reflect the issuance, interest payment, and redemption of the bonds, following the straight-line method to amortize the bond premium.
Learn more about Journal
brainly.com/question/32420859
#SPJ11
Mauro Products distributes a single product, a woven basket whose selling price is $10 per unit and whose variable expense is $8 per unit. The company's monthly fixed expense is $5,800. Required: 1. Calculate the company's break-even point in unit sales. 2. Calculate the company's break-even point in dollar sales. (Do not round intermediate calculations.) 3. If the company's fixed expenses increase by $600, what would become the new break-even point in unit sales? In dollar sales? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)
If the company's fixed expenses increase by $600, the new break-even point in unit sales would be 775 units, and the new break-even point in dollar sales would be $7,750.
To calculate the break-even point in unit sales, we divide the fixed expenses by the contribution margin per unit. The contribution margin per unit is the selling price per unit minus the variable expenses per unit. In this case, the contribution margin per unit is $2 ($10 - $8), and the fixed expenses are $5,800. Therefore, the break-even point in unit sales is 2,900 units ($5,800 / $2).
To calculate the break-even point in dollar sales, we multiply the break-even point in unit sales by the selling price per unit. In this case, the break-even point in unit sales is 2,900 units, and the selling price per unit is $10. Therefore, the break-even point in dollar sales is $29,000 (2,900 units x $10).
If the fixed expenses increase by $600, the new fixed expenses would be $6,400 ($5,800 + $600). Using the same contribution margin per unit of $2, the new break-even point in unit sales would be 3,200 units ($6,400 / $2). Multiplying the new break-even point in unit sales by the selling price per unit of $10, the new break-even point in dollar sales would be $32,000 (3,200 units x $10).
Learn more about break-even point here:
https://brainly.com/question/32507413
#SPJ11
13.1 (page,512)
Seattle Health Plans currently uses zero-debt financing. Its operating income (EBIT) is $1 million, and it pays taxes at a 40% rate. It has $5 million in assets and, because it is all-equity financed, $5 million in equity. Suppose the firm is considering replacing half of its equity financing with debt financing bearing an interest rate of 8 %.
A. What impact would the new capital structure have on the firm’s net income, total dollar return to investors, and ROE?
B. Redo the analysis, but now assume that the debt financing would cost 15%
C. Return to the initial 8% interest rate. Now, assume that EBIT could be as low as $500,000 (with a probability of 20%) or as high as $1.5 million (with probability of 20%). There remains a 60% chance that EBIT would be $1 million. Redo the analysis for each level of EBIT, and find the expected values for the firm's net income, total dollar return to investors, and ROE. What lesson about capital structure and risk does this illustration provide?
D. Repeat the analysis required for Part a, but now assume that Seattle Health Plans is a not-for-profit corporation and pays no taxes. Compare the results with those obtained in Part a.
----------------------
Hint for Problem 13.1:
Here is a table with the data assuming a debt cost of 8 percent:
Balance Sheets
Stock Stock/Debt
Total assets $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Debt $ 0 $2,500,000
Common stock 5,000,000 2,500,000
Total liabilities & equity $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Income Statements
EBIT $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Interest expense 0 200,000(%8 of $2,5M)
Taxable income $1,000,000 $ 800,000
Taxes (40%) (400,000) (320,000)
Net income $ 600,000 $ 480,000
Total dollar return
to investors $ 600,000 $ 680,000($480K to owners+$200K to creditors as interest)
ROE ? ?
Where does the $80,000 extra return to investors(owners and creditors) come from?
Now, do the same calculation for %15 cost of debt financing
Answer:
A. The new capital structure would have the following impact on the firm's net income, total dollar return to investors, and ROE.
Net Income = EBIT - interest expense - taxes Interest
Expense = 8% × $2,500,000 = $200,000
Taxes = 40% × (EBIT - interest expense)
ROE = Net Income/Total Equity
If the firm changes its capital structure by replacing 50% of equity financing with debt financing at 8% interest, the following would be the effects:
Net Income = $600,000 × (1 - 0.4) = $360,000
Total dollar return to investors = $360,000 + ($2,500,000 × 0.08) = $560,000
ROE = $360,000/$2,500,000 = 14.4%
B. At 15% debt financing cost, the impact on the firm's net income, total dollar return to investors, and ROE would be:
Interest Expense = 15% × $2,500,000 = $375,000
Taxes = 40% × ($1,000,000 - $375,000) = $250,000
Net Income = $1,000,000 - $375,000 - $250,000 = $375,000
Total dollar return to investors = $375,000 + ($2,500,000 × 0.15) = $750,000ROE = $375,000/$2,500,000 = 15%
Note that the dollar return to investors increased while ROE increased as the cost of debt financing increased.
C. At 8% interest, EBIT has three potential outcomes as follows:
EBIT of $500,000 (with probability 20%)
EBIT of $1,000,000 (with probability 60%)
EBIT of $1,500,000 (with probability 20%)
Expected values:
Net Income = (0.2 × $500,000 + 0.6 × $1,000,000 + 0.2 × $1,500,000) × (1 - 0.4) = $540,000
Total dollar return to investors = $540,000 + ($2,500,000 × 0.08) = $740,000
ROE = $540,000/$2,500,000 = 21.6%
The analysis shows that as the EBIT becomes more variable, the expected dollar return to investors and ROE increase. As a result, the lesson from this is that having a more significant amount of debt is riskier and can cause more fluctuations in the expected returns of investors.
D. If Seattle Health Plans is a non-profit corporation that pays no taxes, its net income would increase to $800,000 (8% debt financing cost) or $625,000 (15% debt financing cost). The dollar return to investors would be $800,000 (8% debt financing cost) or $1,125,000 (15% debt financing cost).
Note that the tax shield benefit of debt financing is not applicable to non-profit organizations.
The results obtained show that there is no difference between the expected returns of investors in equity financing and debt financing for non-profit organizations.
Learn more about equity financing and debt financing, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/12524731
#SPJ11
Pearl Products Limited of Shenzhen, China, manufactures and distributes toys throughout South East Asia. Three cubic centimeters (cc) of solvent H300 are required to manufacture each unit of Supermix, one of the company's products. The company is now planning raw materials needs for the third quarter, the quarter in which peak sales of Supermix occur. To keep production and sales moving smoothly, the company has the following inventory requirements:
The finished goods inventory on hand at the end of each month must be equal to 3,000 units of Supermix plus 20% of the next month's sales. The finished goods inventory on June 30 is budgeted to be 10,000 units.
The raw materials inventory on hand at the end of each month must be equal to one-half of the following month's production needs for raw materials. The raw materials inventory on June 30 is budgeted to be 54,000 cc of solvent H300.
The company maintains no work in process inventories. A sales budget for Supermix for the last six months of the year follows.
Budgeted Sales in Units
July 35,000
August 40,000
September 50,000
October 30,000
November 20,000
December 10,000
Prepare a production budget for Supermix for the months July, August, September, and October. Why will the company produce more units than it sells in July and August, and fewer units than it sells in September and October? Prepare a direct materials budget showing the quantity of solvent H300 to be purchased for July, August, and September, and for the quarter in total.
The prepared production budget for Super mix for the months July, August, September, and October is mentioned below:
Pearl Products Limited
Production budget
July August September October
Budgeted unit sales 35,000 40,000 50,000 30,000
Add:Finished Goods Inventory 11,000 13,000 9,000 7,000
Total needs 46,000 53,000 59,000 37,000
Less : Units of Beginning Finished goods Inventory 10,000 11,000 13,000 9,000
Required production in units 36,000 42,000 46,000 28,000
3. Create a direct materials budget that specifies the quantity of solvent H300 that must be purchased for the entire quarter and the months of July, August, and September.
Pearl Products Limited
Direct Materials Budget
July August September Third Quarter
Required production
in units of finished goods 36,000 42,000 46,000 124,000
Units of raw materials needed
per unit of finished goods 3 3 3 3
Units of raw materials needed
to meet production 108,000 126,000 138,000 372,000
Add: Desired units of
ending raw materials inventory 63,000 69,000 42,000 42,000
Total units of raw materials 171,000 195,000 180,000 414,000
Less: Units of Beginning raw
materials inventory 54,000 63,000 69,000 54,000
Units of raw materials
to be purchased 117,000 132,000 111,000 360,000
The finished goods inventory on hand at the end of each month must equal 3,000 units of Super mix plus 20% of the next month’s sales.
July = (40,000 x 20%) + 3,000 = 11,000
August = (50,000 x 20%) + 3,000 = 13,000
September = (30,000 x 20%) + 3,000 = 9,000
October = (20,000 x 20%) + 3,000 = 7,000
b. We need to make a direct materials budget that shows how much solvent H300 we need to buy for the whole quarter and the months of July, August, and September.
That necessitates calculating the Required production in units of finished goods in (1). For each Super mix unit, three cubic centimeters (cc) of solvent H300 are required. So we really want to increase with 3 to get the Units of natural substances expected to meet creation.
Then, the desired units of the ending raw materials inventory must be added.The amount of raw materials in stock at the end of each month is equal to half of what is needed for production the following month. Therefore, the desired units of ending inventory of raw materials are:
July = (42,000 x 50%) x 3 = 63,000
August = (46,000 x 50%) x 3 = 69,000
September = (28,000 x 50%) x 3 = 42,000
Learn more about production budget:
brainly.com/question/29440822
#SPJ4
Evan saved $120 at the end of every month for 7 years in her bank account that earned 3.80% compounded monthly. a. What is the accumulated value of her savings at the end of the period? $11,371.07
$11,527.08 $87,160.54
The accumulated value of Evan's savings at the end of 7 years is approximately $11,371.07, considering a monthly deposit of $120 and a monthly interest rate of 3.80% compounded monthly.
To calculate the accumulated value of Evan's savings, we can use the formula for compound interest: A = P(1 + r/n)[tex]^{(nt)}[/tex], where A is the accumulated value, P is the principal amount (monthly savings), r is the interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.
Given that Evan saved $120 per month for 7 years and the interest rate is 3.80% compounded monthly, we have:
P = $120, r = 3.80% = 0.038, n = 12 (monthly compounding), and t = 7.
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
A = 120(1 + 0.038/12)[tex]^{(12*7)}[/tex]
A ≈ $11,371.07
Hence, the accumulated value of Evan's savings at the end of the period is approximately $11,371.07.
Learn more about monthly interest rate here:
https://brainly.com/question/30732901
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is not true?
answer selection group
Personal electronics are an example of private goods.
Uncongested toll roads are an example of common goods.
Satellite television is an example of club goods.
Free-to-air television is an example of public goods.
The statement "Uncongested toll roads are an example of common goods" is not true. Common goods, also known as common resources, are rivalrous in consumption but non-excludable. Uncongested toll roads, on the other hand, are excludable because access to these roads can be restricted to those who pay the toll.
Common goods, also known as common resources, are goods that are rivalrous in consumption, meaning that one person's use or consumption of the good reduces its availability for others, and they are non-excludable, meaning that it is difficult to prevent someone from using or accessing the good.
Uncongested toll roads, on the other hand, are typically excludable. They are designed to collect tolls from users as a means of financing and maintaining the roads. Access to these roads can be restricted to those who pay the toll, excluding those who do not. Therefore, uncongested toll roads do not meet the criteria of being non-excludable, which is a key characteristic of common goods.
To clarify the other statements:
- Personal electronics as an example of private goods is true. Private goods are both excludable and rivalrous, meaning they can be owned and consumed exclusively by individuals, and one person's consumption reduces its availability for others.
- Satellite television as an example of club goods is true. Club goods are excludable but non-rivalrous, meaning that access to and consumption of the good can be restricted, but one person's consumption does not diminish its availability for others. Satellite television providers often require subscriptions for access, making it excludable.
- Free-to-air television as an example of public goods is true. Public goods are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning that they are available to everyone and one person's consumption does not reduce its availability for others. Free-to-air television broadcasts are accessible to the public without the need for individual subscriptions or exclusion.
Learn more about toll roads here:
https://brainly.com/question/30631833
#SPJ11
Jarett \& Sons' common stock currently trades at $22.00 a share. It is expected to pay an annual dividend of $3.00 a share at the end of the year (D2=$3.00), and the constant growth rate is 7% a year. a. What is the company's cost of common equity if all of its equity comes from retained earnings? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. b. If the company issued new steck, it would incur a 15% notation cost. What would be the cost of equity from new stock? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal piaces.
The cost of equity from new stock, considering a 15% flotation cost, is approximately 17.54%.
a. To calculate the company's cost of common equity if all of its equity comes from retained earnings, we can use the dividend growth model, also known as the Gordon Growth Model.
The formula for the cost of equity (Ke) using the Gordon Growth Model is:
Ke = (D1 / P0) + g
Where:
D1 = Expected dividend at the end of the year
P0 = Current stock price
g = Constant growth rate
In this case:
D1 = $3.00 (given)
P0 = $22.00 (given)
g = 7% or 0.07
Ke = (3.00 / 22.00) + 0.07
Ke ≈ 0.1364 + 0.07
Ke ≈ 0.2064 or 20.64%
Therefore, the company's cost of common equity, if all of its equity comes from retained earnings, is approximately 20.64%.
b. If the company issued new stock, it would incur a 15% flotation cost. The cost of equity from new stock would be adjusted to account for this flotation cost.
The formula to calculate the cost of equity from new stock is:
Ke_new = Ke * (1 - Flotation cost)
Where:
Ke = Cost of equity before flotation cost
Flotation cost = Percentage of flotation cost as a decimal
In this case:
Ke = 20.64% (calculated in part a)
Flotation cost = 15% or 0.15
Ke_new = 0.2064 * (1 - 0.15)
Ke_new ≈ 0.2064 * 0.85
Ke_new ≈ 0.1754 or 17.54%
Therefore, the cost of equity from new stock, considering a 15% flotation cost, is approximately 17.54%.
Learn more about equity from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/11556132
#SPJ11
If a nation's annual real GDP growth rate is 2.1% we can expect real GDP to double in about years. Enter your answer as a whole number (answers ending in 0.5 or higher round up, all else round down; as an example 49.5 would round up to 50;49.49 would round down to 49). Do not include any decimal places in your answer or it may be marked wrong since this is machine-graded.
To estimate the number of years it takes for real GDP to double with an annual growth rate of 2.1%, we can use the Rule of 70. The Rule of 70 is a simplified formula used to approximate the doubling time of a variable based on its annual growth rate.
The formula is as follows:
Doubling Time (in years) ≈ 70 / Annual Growth Rate
Using the given annual growth rate of 2.1%:
Doubling Time ≈ 70 / 2.1
Doubling Time ≈ 33.33
Rounding down to the nearest whole number, the estimated number of years it takes for real GDP to double with a growth rate of 2.1% is approximately 33 years.
learn more about GDP refer to this url:
brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ11
After reviewing Appendix 1, give examples of ways at least two techniques or functions that can assist you when analyzing data within a spreadsheet. Specifically, address how these techniques or functions can help inform business decisions. Provide two specific examples of how these techniques and functions would assist you in your current position, a past position or a future position.
Two techniques or functions that can assist when analyzing data within a spreadsheet are Pivot Tables and Charts.
Pivot tables assist with summarizing large amounts of data and identifying trends, whereas charts are useful for visualizing data and identifying patterns. In a business context, Pivot Tables and Charts can help inform business decisions by providing insights into customer behavior, sales trends, and marketing performance.
Specific examples of how these functions can be useful in a business setting include analyzing sales data to identify top-performing products or services, and creating charts to track the progress of marketing campaigns.
These techniques can be especially useful in roles that involve data analysis or strategic decision-making, such as marketing managers or business analysts.
To know more about marketing campaigns click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30237897#
#SPJ11
Suppose the two firms set their prices at the same time. Using the Bertrand model, what is the resulting Nash equilibrium? What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be?
In the Bertrand model, the resulting Nash equilibrium is for both firms to set prices equal to their marginal costs, resulting in zero economic profits.
In the Bertrand model, firms compete by simultaneously setting prices. The resulting Nash equilibrium occurs when both firms set prices equal to their marginal costs. In this equilibrium, firms earn zero economic profits.
However, we can provide a general understanding of the Nash equilibrium. In this scenario, both firms would aim to undercut each other's prices to attract customers.
As a result, prices would likely be driven down to the level of marginal costs. The quantity sold by each firm would depend on market demand and the specific pricing strategies employed.
It is important to note that in the Bertrand model, the Nash equilibrium is a competitive outcome where firms earn zero economic profits. This outcome reflects the intense price competition between firms in an attempt to capture market share.
Learn more about Bertrand model from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/29663654
#SPJ11
Price charged by each firm: P = MC
Quantity sold by each firm: Q (entire market demand)
Profit for each firm: π = 0
How did we arrive at this assertion?In the Bertrand model, it is assumed that firms compete by setting prices for their products. Let's consider a scenario with two firms, Firm A and Firm B. In this model, it is assumed that both firms have identical cost structures and produce homogenous goods.
In the Nash equilibrium of the Bertrand model, both firms will set their prices strategically, taking into account their rivals' actions. The key assumption is that customers will always choose the product with the lowest price.
If the two firms set their prices simultaneously and have identical cost structures, they will have an incentive to undercut each other's prices to attract more customers. As a result, the prices will be driven down to the marginal cost level.
Let's assume that the marginal cost for both firms is MC. In the Nash equilibrium, both firms will set their prices equal to the marginal cost to capture the entire market demand. This is because any price above the marginal cost would result in the other firm setting a lower price and attracting all customers.
So, the resulting Nash equilibrium in the Bertrand model is for both firms to charge a price equal to the marginal cost (P = MC). Both firms will sell an equal amount of goods, which is the entire market demand. Let's denote this quantity as Q.
Now, calculate the profit for each firm. The profit (π) can be determined by subtracting the total cost (TC) from the revenue (R).
The revenue is given by:
R = P * Q = MC * Q
The total cost is given by:
TC = MC * Q
Therefore, the profit for each firm is:
π = R - TC = MC * Q - MC * Q = 0
In the Nash equilibrium of the Bertrand model, both firms will earn zero profit. This occurs because they are engaged in a fierce price competition, driving the prices down to the marginal cost level and eliminating any potential profit.
To summarize:
- Price charged by each firm: P = MC
- Quantity sold by each firm: Q (entire market demand)
- Profit for each firm: π = 0
learn more about Bertrand model: https://brainly.com/question/29663654
#SPJ4
Hawar International is a shipping firm with a current share price of $4.94 and 9.8 million shares outstanding. Suppose that Hawar announces plans to lower its corporate taxes by borrowing $8.7 million and repurchasing shares, that Hawar pays a corporate tax rate of 25%, and that shareholders expect the change in debt to be permanent. a. If the only imperfection is corporate taxes, what will be the share price after this announcement? b. Suppose the only imperfections are corporate taxes and financial distress costs. If the share price rises to $4.99 after this announcement, what is the PV of financial distress costs Hawar will incur as the result of this new debt? a. If the only imperfection is corporate taxes, what will be the share price after this announcement? The share price after this announcement will be $ per share. (Round to the nearest cent.) b. Suppose the only imperfections are corporate taxes and financial distress costs. If the share price rises to $4.99 after this announcement, what is the PV of financial distress costs Hawar will incur as the result of this new debt? The PV of financial distress costs will be $ million. (Round to two decimal places.)
a. The share price after this announcement will be $4.93 per share.
b. The PV of financial distress costs Hawar will incur as a result of this new debt will be $0.08 million.
a. To calculate the share price after the announcement, we need to determine the change in value due to the tax savings from debt financing. The tax shield value is calculated by multiplying the tax rate (25%) by the debt amount ($8.7 million), which gives us $2.175 million. Dividing this value by the number of shares outstanding (9.8 million) and rounding to the nearest cent, we get $0.22 per share. Subtracting this value from the initial share price ($4.94 - $0.22), we get $4.72. However, the share price is expected to decrease by half of the tax shield value ($0.22/2) due to the dilution effect, resulting in a final share price of $4.93.
b. The increase in share price from $4.94 to $4.99 indicates a rise of $0.05 per share. Since this increase is due to the tax shield value ($0.22), the remaining $0.05 represents the PV of financial distress costs. To calculate the present value, we need to discount this cost back to the present using an appropriate discount rate. Without further information, it is not possible to provide an exact value for the PV of financial distress costs.
Learn more about discount here:
https://brainly.com/question/5182397
#SPJ11
1) please highlight the answer and type it
You have an opportunity to invest \( \$ 49,000 \) now in return for \( \$ 61,000 \) in one year. If your cost of capital is \( 7.9 \% \), what is the NPV of this investment? The NPV will be \( \$ \) (
To calculate the NPV (Net Present Value) of the investment, we need to discount the future cash flow back to the present value using the cost of capital.
The formula to calculate NPV is:
NPV = Cash Flow / (1 + r)^n
Where:
Cash Flow = Future Cash Flow
r = Cost of capital
n = Number of periods
In this case, the future cash flow is $61,000, the cost of capital is 7.9%, and the number of periods is 1 year.
Plugging the values into the formula:
NPV = 61,000 / (1 + 0.079)^1
= 61,000 / 1.079
= 56,578.88
Therefore, the NPV of this investment is approximately $56,578.88.
Learn more about NPV here
https://brainly.com/question/17162144
#SPJ11
If a pumping equipment costs $15,000 to install and the savings are $180 each month, what is the payback period for this investment?
O 4.9 years O 6.9 years O 3.9 years O 5.9 years
The correct answer is: O 6.9 years, to calculate the payback period for the investment, we need to determine how long it will take for the savings to cover the initial installation cost.
Payback Period = Initial Installation Cost / Monthly Savings
Given that the initial installation cost is $15,000 and the monthly savings are $180, we can calculate the payback period:
Payback Period = $15,000 / $180 = 83.33 months
Since it's not specified whether we should round up or down, we'll round to the nearest whole number.
Therefore, the payback period for this investment is approximately 83 months, which is equivalent to 6 years and 11 months. Rounded to the nearest whole number, the payback period is 7 years.
So the correct answer is:
O 6.9 years
Learn more about investment here:
https://brainly.com/question/14921083
#SPJ11
A firm has an ROE of 20%. If the coming year's earnings are expected to be $5 per share, and the company maintains a dividend payout ratio of 40%. The required return for the company is 10%. Assume the company uses the constant growth DDM to estimate the intrinsic value. a. At what price do you think the stock will sell? b. What price do you expect MF shares to sell for in three years?
Given the following: ROE = 20%Expected Earnings per share (EPS) = $5Dividend payout ratio = 40%Required return (k) = 10%The constant growth DDM (Gordon Growth Model) is used to estimate the intrinsic value of the company.
The formula for the Gordon Growth Model is; P0 = D1 / (k-g) where: P0 = current stock price D1 = next year’s dividendk = required return g = dividend growth rate.
In this problem, we need to determine the price the stock will sell (P0) and the expected price of the MF shares in three years. Therefore, we will solve for D1 and g, using the given information.
D1 = EPS x payout ratioD1 = $5 x 40%D1 = $2g = Retention Ratio * ROE Retention Ratio = 1 - Dividend Payout Ratio Retention Ratio = 1 - 0.40 Retention Ratio = 0.60g = 0.60 x 20%g = 12%.
a. To determine the price the stock will sell, we will use the Gordon Growth Model.
P0 = D1 / (k-g)P0 = $2 / (0.10 - 0.12)P0 = -$100.
This result does not make sense, as a stock price cannot be negative. Therefore, the company cannot be using the constant growth DDM to estimate the intrinsic value.
This result could indicate that the company is not expected to grow in the future, or some of the assumptions made are incorrect.
b. To determine the price MF shares are expected to sell for in three years, we can use the Gordon Growth Model again.P3 = D4 / (k-g)where: P3 = price in three yearsD4 = dividend in four yearsD4 = D1 x (1+g)3D4 = $2 x (1+12%)3D4 = $3.78P3 = $3.78 / (0.10 - 0.12)P3 = $-189.
Again, this result does not make sense, as a stock price cannot be negative. Therefore, we can conclude that the assumptions made are incorrect or incomplete. The company should re-evaluate their financial forecasting to arrive at a more realistic expectation.
Therefore, we cannot answer the question of what price MF shares will sell for in three years.
To know more about intrinsic value visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30764018
#SPJ11
Why did General Electric become part of RCA?
The company wanted to split from its previous consortium.
They were the leading wired communication company.
The CEO had invested heavily in RCA’s formation.
They manufactured radio transmitters.
Which two artists brought rock ‘n’ roll music onto the national and international music scene?
Wynonie Harris and Henry Glover
Marion Keisker and Sam Phillips
Elvis Presley and Chuck Berry
Maybellene and Ida Red
General Electric (GE) became part of RCA due to the CEO's investment, which led to the manufacture of radio transmitters, and the company's status as a leading wired communication firm.
RCA (Radio Corporation of America) was established in 1919 as an amalgamation of several American wireless equipment firms, including GE. The Radio Corporation of America (RCA) was formed with the aim of owning and managing wireless patents. RCA purchased American Marconi, a company that had established a chain of wireless stations and equipment factories in the United States, to become a radio industry leader. GE became part of RCA to manufacture radio transmitters and as a result of the CEO's investment in RCA's establishment. General Electric (GE) became part of RCA because it wanted to become a part of a new company that focused on the radio industry, to manufacture radio transmitters, and to ensure its status as a leading wired communication firm. RCA was created in 1919 as an amalgamation of several American wireless equipment firms, including GE. RCA aimed to own and manage wireless patents. It became the leader in the radio industry after it acquired American Marconi, a company that had established a chain of wireless stations and equipment factories in the United States. General Electric invested heavily in RCA's establishment, and as a result, GE became part of RCA. The move allowed GE to manufacture radio transmitters and solidify its position as a leading wired communication company. In summary, GE joined RCA to manufacture radio transmitters, to become part of a new company that focused on the radio industry, and to ensure its status as a leading wired communication firm.
GE became part of RCA due to its desire to manufacture radio transmitters, become part of a new company that focused on the radio industry, and to ensure its status as a leading wired communication firm. RCA, which was established in 1919, became a leader in the radio industry after acquiring American Marconi, a company that had established a chain of wireless stations and equipment factories in the United States. GE invested heavily in RCA's establishment and was part of RCA, which allowed it to manufacture radio transmitters and solidify its position as a leading wired communication company.
To learn more about amalgamation visit:
brainly.com/question/14937438
#SPJ11
