Answer:
Two reasons someone might want to live in Japan during the medieval period are:
Samurai culture: The medieval period in Japan is often associated with the rise of the samurai class and the development of their unique culture. Samurai were highly skilled warriors who were trained in various martial arts, and they were held in great esteem by society. For someone interested in martial arts, samurai culture, or Japanese history, living in medieval Japan could be an exciting and intriguing experience.Japanese aesthetics: The medieval period in Japan was also a time of great artistic and cultural achievement. Many of the great works of Japanese art, such as literature, poetry, and painting, were created during this time. Japan's unique aesthetic sensibilities, such as wabi-sabi and yugen, were also developed during this period. For someone interested in Japanese art and culture, living in medieval Japan could provide an opportunity to experience these works firsthand and to gain a deeper understanding of Japan's artistic traditions.Two reasons someone might not want to live in Japan during the medieval period are:
Social hierarchy: Like many other societies during this time, medieval Japan had a strict social hierarchy with little room for upward mobility. If someone was not born into a privileged position, it would be difficult for them to rise up in society or even to make a decent living. This could lead to a sense of frustration and hopelessness.Warfare and instability: The medieval period in Japan was marked by frequent warfare and political instability. In addition to the dangers of battle, there was also the risk of being caught up in political conflicts or being caught between competing factions. For someone looking for stability and safety, living in medieval Japan may not have been an attractive option.How Did Marx view the conditions of workers in the 1800s?
Marx viewed the conditions of workers in the 1800s as exploitative and alienating, with workers being treated as commodities.
Marx viewed the conditions of workers in the 1800s as deeply troubling and exploitative.
He believed that workers were being treated as mere commodities, forced to sell their labor power to capitalists in exchange for wages that were inadequate to meet their basic needs.
Marx argued that capitalism was inherently unequal and that it created a class struggle between the working class and the capitalist class.
He believed that the only way to overcome this exploitation was for the working class to rise up in revolution and seize control of the means of production.
Marx's critique of capitalism and his vision for a more just society have had a lasting impact on political and economic thought.
For more such questions on Marx:
https://brainly.com/question/1593519
#SPJ11
What did the Supreme Court find in Lemon v. Kurtzman?
a. Government aid may be used to purchase prayer books and religious music.
b. Government funding may support religious (non-secular) activities.
c. The government must avoid excessive entanglement with religion.
d. Government assistance to religious institutions must advance religious activities.
e. Government programs may advance one particular religion over another.
Answer:
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), established a tripartite test to determine violations of the First Amendment establishment clause. The Court found that two states violated the establishment clause by making state financial aid available to “church-related educational institutions.”
Which of these people would argue that this was the accurate and truthful model? Select all who apply.
Answer:
Where is the rest of the question?
Explanation:
Identify one historical example which demonstrates the agency of religion, and belief systems or traditions, on the historical development of science and answer the question: How has religion, or a religious or spiritual tradition, influenced the historical development of science?
Answer:
Religion has had a profound influence on the historical development of science. In the Middle Ages, for example, the Catholic Church was a major patron of science. The Church funded universities, libraries, and astronomical observatories. It also supported the work of scientists such as Roger Bacon and Albertus Magnus. These scientists made important contributions to the development of astronomy, mathematics, and medicine.
In the 17th century, the Scientific Revolution was a period of rapid scientific advancement. This period was marked by the development of new scientific methods, such as the scientific method, and the discovery of new scientific laws, such as the laws of motion and gravity. The Scientific Revolution was also influenced by religion. Many of the scientists of the Scientific Revolution were motivated by a desire to understand God's creation. They believed that by studying the natural world, they could learn more about God.
In the 19th and 20th centuries, science and religion have sometimes been seen as competing worldviews. However, there are many scientists who are also religious. They believe that science and religion can coexist peacefully. They argue that science can provide us with knowledge about the natural world, while religion can provide us with knowledge about the meaning of life.
Today, there is a growing interest in the intersection of science and religion. This is due in part to the fact that science is becoming increasingly complex, and it is difficult for laypeople to understand it. Religion can provide a framework for understanding science, and it can help us to make sense of the world around us.
Here are some specific examples of how religion has influenced the development of science:
The Catholic Church was a major patron of science in the Middle Ages. It funded universities, libraries, and astronomical observatories.
Many of the scientists of the Scientific Revolution were motivated by a desire to understand God's creation. They believed that by studying the natural world, they could learn more about God.
In the 19th and 20th centuries, there were many scientists who were also religious. They believed that science and religion can coexist peacefully.
Today, there is a growing interest in the intersection of science and religion. This is due in part to the fact that science is becoming increasingly complex, and it is difficult for laypeople to understand it. Religion can provide a framework for understanding science, and it can help us to make sense of the world around us.
Explanation:
1. compare Madero's success in overthrowing Díaz and winning the election, to his failure at uniting the country and following through on his promises. Make sure to discuss in detail two significant factors in both his success and his failure.
2. What did Ricardo Flores Magón warn of in his article published on the eve of the Revolution in 1910 (The Mexico Reader)? Do you think his predictions come true under the presidencies of Madero and Huerta? Compare your thoughts to those of the Zapatistas in the Plan of Ayala (The Mexico Reader). Make sure you use evidence from the readings.
1) Madero overthrew Daz and won the election, but he was unable to unite the country and fulfill his pledges because to his lack of political experience and refusal to handle agricultural reform.
2) Ricardo Flores Magón predicted that inequality and exploitation will continue under the new administration, as they had under Madero and Huerta, as proven by the Zapatista Plan of Ayala.
What did this lead to ?Despite these considerable achievements however Madero faced significant challenges in unifying the country afterwards due primarily to factors such as his limited leadership experience and hesitance towards more radical action on issues like land reform.
As Ricardo Flores Magón warned prior to the Revolution - a warning echoed by the Zapatistas' Plan of Ayala - simply replacing one despot with another would not suffice; true change would require deeper societal restructuring
The common belief among both Magón and the Zapatistas was that cosmetic alterations to politics would not be effective in building a society characterized by true democracy and equity.
Learn more about Madero:
https://brainly.com/question/14328558
#SPJ1
How is a marginal analysis different from a cost/benefit analysis? (1 point) A cost/benefit analysis is an economic tool used by large businesses, while a marginal analysis is better suited for small businesses or personal finance choices. A cost/benefit analysis focuses on increasing the profits of an existing product, while a marginal analysis analyzes the spending of revenues. A cost/benefit analysis is a more detailed type of marginal analysis meant to be performed throughout the production process. the additional costs and A cost/benefit analysis compares costs and benefits of a decision, while a marginal analysis compares O benefits of a specific decision.
The difference between marginal analysis and cost/benefit analysis is "C cost/benefit analysis is an economic tool used by large businesses, while a marginal analysis is better suited for small businesses or personal finance choices." Hence the correct answer is option C)
Marginal analysis and cost/benefit analysis are two important tools in economics that are used to make decisions related to production, pricing, and investment. Both methods have their own unique features and are suited for different types of decisions.
A marginal analysis is an economic tool that focuses on analyzing the effects of a small change in a specific variable. It is often used to evaluate production decisions related to a single unit or product. Marginal analysis is particularly useful for small businesses or personal finance choices where the decision makers are interested in maximizing the benefits from the limited resources available. For example, if a small business is deciding whether to produce an additional unit of a product, they would perform a marginal analysis to evaluate the additional costs and benefits of producing that unit.
On the other hand, a cost/benefit analysis is a more detailed type of economic analysis that compares the costs and benefits of a decision. This method is typically used by large businesses when making strategic decisions related to investment or expanding their operations. Option C) cost/benefit analysis takes into account the entire production process, from the initial investment to the final sale of the product, and evaluates the profitability of the decision based on the expected costs and benefits.
While both marginal analysis and cost/benefit analysis are important economic tools, they are used in different contexts and for different types of decisions. Marginal analysis is better suited for small business or personal finance choices, while cost/benefit analysis is typically used by large businesses when making strategic decisions related to investment or expanding their operations.
for more such question on marginal analysis
https://brainly.com/question/12530169
#SPJ11
Complete Question
How is a marginal analysis different from a cost/benefit analysis? (1 point)
A) cost/benefit analysis is an economic tool used by large businesses, while a marginal analysis is better suited for small businesses or personal finance choices.
B) cost/benefit analysis focuses on increasing the profits of an existing product, while a marginal analysis analyzes the spending of revenues.
C) cost/benefit analysis is a more detailed type of marginal analysis meant to be performed throughout the production process. the additional costs
D) cost/benefit analysis compares costs and benefits of a decision, while a marginal analysis compares O benefits of a specific decision.
Following the U.S. declaration of war against _____(Germany / Japan) in 1941, people of Japanese descent, including American citizens, were forcibly placed in _____(concentration camps / internment camps) that were located in _____(big cities / isolated locations).
Answer:
Japan, internment camps, isolated locations
Explanation:
America enter red the world war 2 in December 1941 after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor; as a part of military preparations, all Japanese Americans were placed in isolated internment camps as part of executive order 9066
1. The Kachhwaha Jaipur, as Catherine Asher emphasis, represents a city of tolerance and progress. Discuss.
This study contends that Jaipur, created in 1727 by the Kachhwaha monarch Sawai Jai Singh II, was meant to accommodate a variety of people, despite the city's reputation as a haven for Hindus.
The Mughal emperor Akbar's policy of sulh-i kul, which is loosely translated as "universal toleration," continues in many ways in Jaipur. A map of state policy that encouraged tolerance to ensure good governance and prosperity can be seen in Jaipur's architecture, which was constructed between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries, as well as in paintings housed in the royal collections of the court.
High ranking Hindu lords who were quickly welcomed by the Mughal court constructed on both their ancestral domains and crown territories throughout the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries, while those who accepted Mughal dominion under coercion had a more complex attitude toward temple construction. The latter group built most of the temples in their own areas, frequently at pilgrimage sites or at locations they intended to become pilgrimage destinations.
Learn more about Jaipur here:
https://brainly.com/question/31530735
#SPJ1
4
Antiphon think we are not equal because of *
O nature
O custom and human laws
Antiphon thinks we are not equal because of nature. The correct option is a.
In Christian ritual, an antiphon is a brief chant sung as a refrain. The Psalms are the texts of antiphons. Their form was preferred by St. Ambrose, and they are prominent in Ambrosian chant, yet they are also widely used in Gregorian chant. They can be used at Mass for the Introit, Offertory, or Communion. They are also used in the Liturgy for the Hours, most commonly for Lauds and Vespers.
The broader term antiphony refers to any call and response style of singing, such as kirtan or sea shanty, as well as songs and worship in African as well as African-American cultures.
Learn more about Antiphon, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1978513
#SPJ1
Semester 1 / HSY2601-23-S1 / Welcome Message / Assessment 6 Identify the German philosopher who predicted that the Industrial Revolution would unleash a communist revolution.
The German philosopher who predicted that the Industrial Revolution would unleash a communist revolution was Karl Marx.
The contribution of Karl Marx
Marx, along with Friedrich Engels, co-authored "The Communist Manifesto" in 1848, in which they outlined their theories on class struggle, historical materialism, and the inevitability of a proletarian revolution.
Marx believed that the Industrial Revolution and the capitalist system it engendered would lead to increasing social inequality, exploitation of the working class, and eventually, a revolution that would establish a communist society.
His ideas laid the foundation for the development of Marxism and had a profound impact on political and social thought worldwide.
Read more on Karl Marx here:https://brainly.com/question/31453767
#SPJ1
4. The European powers had more _____________and were able to establish _____________ in Africa.
which of the following was one effect of the Crusades on Western Europe a feudalism became a stronger institution b Christians and Muslims United c wealthy Europeans began to demand Eastern grades the economy suffered because trade between Western and Eastern people was no longer possible
One effect of the Crusades on Western Europe is wealthy Europeans began to demand Eastern goods, which led to an increase in wealth in Europe and a thriving economy. Thus the correct option is C.
A series of religious conflicts conducted in the Holy Land by Christians in order to recover Jerusalem from Muslim authority called The Crusades.
The Crusades had a variety of significant consequences on Western Europe, including the establishment of feudalism and the growth of wealthy merchants; one of the most notable economy ramifications of the Crusades was the desire for Eastern products.
Therefore, option C is appropriate.
Learn more about Crusades, here:
https://brainly.com/question/436980
#SPJ1
how did Calvinism affect society? a. people believed God's law was the only law in disobeyed local laws b. people believe that their leaders were chosen by God c. people turned away from God and the church d. people work hard and behave well
Answer:
i think the answer to this question is B
Explanation: cause A its not true and c that the complete opisite
and D people aready work there but off
Please Explain the difference between the 'harmony thesis' and 'separate spheres model' methodologies of the history of science and religion.
And Give one historical case study as an example to compare and contrast those methodologies in the answer.
Answer:
The harmony thesis and the separate spheres model are two historiographical approaches to the study of the relationship between science and religion. The harmony thesis argues that science and religion have always been compatible and have often worked together to advance human knowledge. The separate spheres model, on the other hand, argues that science and religion are distinct and separate spheres of human activity, and that they have often been in conflict with each other.
One historical case study that can be used to compare and contrast these two methodologies is the case of Galileo Galilei. Galileo was a 17th-century astronomer who made important discoveries about the solar system. His discoveries challenged the prevailing view that the Earth was the center of the universe, which was a view that was supported by the Catholic Church. Galileo was eventually put on trial by the Inquisition and forced to recant his beliefs.
The harmony thesis would argue that Galileo's case was an example of a conflict between science and religion, but that this conflict was an exception to the rule. The separate spheres model, on the other hand, would argue that Galileo's case was an example of the inherent conflict between science and religion.
The truth is probably somewhere in between these two extremes. Science and religion have often been compatible, but they have also often been in conflict. The relationship between science and religion is complex and ever-evolving, and it is difficult to make generalizations about it.
Here are some additional points to consider when comparing and contrasting the harmony thesis and the separate spheres model:
The harmony thesis is more optimistic about the relationship between science and religion, while the separate spheres model is more pessimistic.
The harmony thesis focuses on the similarities between science and religion, while the separate spheres model focuses on the differences between them.
The harmony thesis is more likely to see science and religion as complementary, while the separate spheres model is more likely to see them as competing.
Ultimately, the best way to understand the relationship between science and religion is to study it in its historical context. By looking at specific cases, we can see how the relationship has changed over time and how it has been shaped by different cultures and individuals.
Explanation:
Which of the following actions indicated U.S. isolationism after
World War I?
A.failure to ratify the Versailles Treaty and join the League of Nations
B.passage of the Prohibition Amendment
C.passage of the Women's Suffrage Amendment
D.establishment of and membership in the United Nations
E. increases in military spending
Answer:it’s a
Explanation:
trust
