The first important difference between a sublease and an assignment is that in an assignment, responsibility for the original lease is completely transferred to the assignee.
This means that the assignee takes on all rights and obligations under the original lease contract and the original tenant has no further responsibility for fulfillment of the lease. In a sublease, on the other hand, the original tenant retains primary responsibility for performance of the original lease contract.
This means that the original tenant still has some responsibility for fulfillment of the lease, even after subleasing the right to occupy the property to another tenant.
To know more about lease contract go to
https://brainly.com/question/29380983
#SPJ4
what theory can explain why some drug dealers experience property victimization?
The theory some drug dealers experience property was victimization, considered as, lifestyle theory.
What is experience?As the word experience is referring as, the experience refers to intended psychological feature in general, and perceptual experience in particular, as well as the practical knowledge and acquaintance produced by these intended processes.
As, the lifestyle theory is considered, as people may become the unfortunate person of law-breaking because of their lifestyles and choices. For example, someone with a speculation or substance dependence could be as an “easy victim” by a con creative person.
Therefore, As a result, the lifestyle theory was the dealers experience property victimization.
Learn more about the experience here:
https://brainly.com/question/11256472
#SPJ1
How many African Americans served in the Senate during the entire twentieth century?
a. eight
b. ten
c. two
d. three
Eight African Americans served in the Senate during the entire twentieth century.
The correct option is (a).
Eleven Black Americans have held elected or appointed positions in the Senate. During the nineteenth and twentieth century, there were two each.
Black individuals, a definite noun Black people with African heritage who reside in the United States and are connected to those who were born in Africa are known as African-Americans. African-Americans currently make approximately 12% of the population.
Regardless of whether they are a part of or distinct from mainstream culture, "African-American culture," also referred to as "Black-American culture," refers to the cultural contributions made by African Americans to American society.
Three of the eight African Americans who have served in the Senate since the American Civil Rights Movement for African Americans have represented Illinois' Class 3 seat, including Barack Obama, who later became president of the country. As a result, Illinois now has the highest number of Black Americans serving as senators.
Therefore, the correct answer will be option (a)
To know more about African
https://brainly.com/question/13734659
#SPJ4
A man believed that he and his wife were headed toward a divorce, and was concerned that his wife would fight to keep a valuable painting they had purchased together on their honeymoon. Although the man was staying at a hotel, he decided to break into the house and take the painting when he believed his wife would be out. So as not to draw any neighbors' attention by walking in the front door, the man climbed through an open window in the back. The wife was in fact home, and she was furious when she saw the man there. She pushed him repeatedly, telling him to get out of her house. The man pushed the wife back, and the wife hit her head on the corner of a table. Because she had a blood clotting disorder, the injury caused excessive bleeding in her brain, and she died the next day. The man has been charged with felony murder. The evidence at trial shows that the man knew of his wife's blood clotting disorder. Is the man likely to be convicted of felony murder?
It is possible that the man could be convicted of felony murder. Felony murder is a legal doctrine that holds a person responsible for any deaths that occur during the commission of certain felonies, such as burglary.
In this case, the man committed the felony of burglary when he broke into the house to take the painting. During the commission of this felony, the man caused the death of his wife. The fact that the man knew of his wife's blood clotting disorder may be considered in determining his level of intent or knowledge, but it may not necessarily absolve him of responsibility for her death.
The specific details of the case and the laws of the jurisdiction in which it takes place would ultimately determine the outcome of the trial.
To know more about felony murder go to
https://brainly.com/question/3325097
#SPJ4
which of the following is not an example of public law? a. administrative law b. criminal law c. constitutional law d. contract law
no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The 14th amendment provides no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states.
According to the 14th Amendment, No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. According to this amendment no state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law and nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The Amendment 14 passed by the Senate on June 8, 1866 and ratified two years later on July 9, 1868. The Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship to all persons who born or naturalized in the United States including formerly enslaved people and provided all citizens with equal protection under the laws.
To learn more about 14th amendment
https://brainly.com/question/7570923
#SPJ4
The correct question is,
which amendment provides no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws ?
A homeowner lived next door to a vacant lot owned by another neighbor. From the time the homeowner purchased his own property, he told other people that he owned the vacant lot. The homeowner had an underground dog fence installed under the vacant lot without the neighbor's knowledge. The homeowner also mowed the vacant lot regularly in the summer. When he had landscaping services performed on his own property, the landscapers dug up vegetation beds, which extended three feet into the neighbor's lot. After the statutory period for bringing a trespass action had passed, the homeowner brought an action to quiet title, claiming ownership of the vacant lot.
Which of the following additional facts, if true, would be most helpful to the homeowner's case?
A One of the people that the homeowner often told about owning the vacant lot was the neighbor herself.
B The neighbor occasionally saw the homeowner's dog on the vacant lot, but never demanded that the homeowner keep the dog in the homeowner's yard.
C The vegetation beds continued to exist with the same dimensions, and were regularly maintained by the homeowner, for the entire statutory period.
D When he told people that he owned the vacant lot, the homeowner believed that it was true.
The following additional facts, if true, would be most helpful to the homeowner's case homeowner needs to establish OPEN hostile possession of the property... so she could tell the neighbor about her ownership of the lot.
What constitutes an unfavourable possession example?A person may assert a property right in land that is the property of another under the legal theory known as adverse possession. Continuous use of a private road or driveway or agricultural development on an undeveloped plot of land are typical examples of adverse occupation.
What is the most typical method for transferring real estate between parties?Deed of Warranty: A warranty deed is the most typical document used to transfer property (sometimes called a "grant deed"). A warranty deed specifically guarantees to the new owner that the grantor/seller has good title to the property while transferring ownership.
To Know more about ownership
https://brainly.com/question/14480423
#SPJ1
which branch power is being checked create and pass legislation
The legislative branch is the branch that has the power to check, create and pass a legislation.
The legislative branch may be referred to or taken into consideration as the branch that deals with the legal structuring and lawful observation in the society that falls under its jurisdiction. In order to maintain the legal formalities, the legislative branch also has the powers to make, amend, change, or discard the laws for creating and passing legislations within the constitution. Thus, the powers of legislative branch are given.
Learn more about the legislative branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/11883152
#SPJ4
complete question
Which branch's power is being checked to create and pass a legislation?
Give an example of current policy where we see marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix!
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a prominent example of marble cake federalism in which state and federal authorities are intertwined in an inseparable mix.
While providing federal cash to support private health insurance exchanges and provide other healthcare-related protections, the ACA compels states to extend Medicaid eligibility.
States can choose to implement the ACA on their own, but if they do not, the federal government will take over and do so. But, states are given significant latitude in how they carry out specific provisions of the legislation, such as how they run their Medicaid programmes and establish their insurance exchanges.
Under this form of federalism, states have some flexibility over how they carry out the law while federal authorities make sure that it is adhered to, creating the ideal balance between state and federal authority.
To learn more about legislation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ4
The state took possession of Oliver's farm when he passed away because he did not have a will or any heirs. What right did the state exercise?
a. condemnation
b. eminent domain
c. escheat
d. inverse condemnation
The state took possession of Oliver's farm when he passed away because he did not have a will or any heirs. Here the state exercised the power of escheat. The correct option is C.
The real estate of a person who passes away without heirs is given to the state or the crown under the common law doctrine of escheat. It makes sure that property does not remain unclaimed and in "limbo."
It first applied to a variety of circumstances in which a legal interest in land was eliminated by operation of law, reverting to the immediately superior feudal lord as the new owner.
Escheat is a concept that is embodied in Section 29. According to the doctrine of escheat, if a person passes away intestate and does not leave behind an eligible heir, their property passes to the government.
To know more about law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not a consideration when judging whether a method of criminal punishment of prison discipline is cruel and unusual?O Deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, education, and treatment of the offenders rather than on rehabilitationO Mandatory Minimum SentencesO General, specific, transferred, constructiveO Prevailing social values, Penological Purpose, Human Dignity
of the following, the most compelling reason for the united states to enter the war wasa. a moral obligation to halt the refugee crisis in Belgium.
b. concern over the repayment of Allied debts to American banks.
c. a desire to become more involved in the affairs of Europe.
d. the outrage of American citizens over German submarine warfare.
The most compelling reason for the United States to enter the war was d. the outrage of American citizens over German submarine warfare.
In 1915, the passenger liner Lusitania, carrying American passengers, was sunk by a German submarine, resulting in the loss of 1,198 lives, including 128 Americans. This event, along with continued unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany, outraged the American public and led to increased calls for the U.S. to enter the war on the side of the Allies. President Woodrow Wilson initially resisted these calls, but in 1917, after German attempts to form an alliance with Mexico were uncovered, Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany. The sinking of the Lusitania and other incidents of German aggression against American interests provided the most compelling reasons for the U.S. to enter the war.
To learn more about war, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1113074
#SPJ4
which types of penalties are only imposed after normal due process including a trial?
In the context of criminal law, penalties that are only imposed after normal due process including a trial are generally known as "punitive" or "criminal" penalties.
Punitive or criminal sanctions that are normally applied only after due process, including a trial, include:
Imprisonment or Incarceration: If convicted of a crime, a person may be sentenced to imprisonment or incarceration in a jail or prison facility.
Fines: If a person is found guilty of a crime, the court may order them to pay a fine, which is a monetary penalty.
Restitution: Whenever a person is found guilty of a crime, he or she may be required to make restitution, which entails compensating the victim for any damages or losses experienced as a result of the crime.
For such more question on criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
What is the role of the Texas Senate in appointments made by the governor?
The Texas Senate confirms the governor's nominees further they can remove nominees from office.
The governor of Texas is head of the state of Texas. The governor is head of the executive and legislative branch of the government and the commander in chief of the military of Texas. Governors were nominated across the state which is confirmed by the senate by a motion of majority further the senate has the right to remove any nomination from such a election on the basis of certain circumstances or situations. The senate can also convict the governor under the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. The senate can prohibit such officials from holding public offices in the future.
Know more about "Texas Senate" visit
brainly.com/question/15191795
#SPJ4
As a shopper was leaving a supermarket, an automatic door that should have opened outward opened inward, striking and breaking the shopper's nose. The owner of the building had installed the automatic door. The lease, pursuant to which the supermarket occupied the building, provided that the supermarket was responsible for all maintenance of the premises. The shopper sued the supermarket. At trial, neither the shopper nor the supermarket offered any testimony, expert or otherwise, as to why the door had opened inward. At the close of evidence, both the shopper and the supermarket moved for judgment as a matter of law.
How should the trial judge rule?
A: Grant judgment for the shopper, because it is undisputed that the door malfunctioned.
B: Grant judgment for the supermarket, because the shopper failed to join the owner of the building as a defendant.
C: Grant judgment for the supermarket, because the shopper failed to offer proof of the supermarket's negligence.
D: Submit the case to the jury, because on these facts negligence may be inferred.
The correct answer is C: Grant judgment for the supermarket, because the shopper failed to offer proof of the supermarket's negligence.
In this case, the shopper is suing the store for injuries caused as a result of the automatic door malfunction. According to the leasing agreement, the store is responsible for all property maintenance. Neither the consumer nor the supermarket testified or offered proof about the cause of the door issue during the trial.
To prove a negligence claim, the shopper must demonstrate that the supermarket owed the consumer a duty to maintain the automatic door, that the supermarket failed that obligation, and that the failure resulted in the shopper's injuries. In this case, the shopper failed to provide any evidence of the supermarket's carelessness. The malfunctioning of the door does not demonstrate fault on the side of the supermarket.
For such more question on judgment:
brainly.com/question/936272
#SPJ4
which amendment(s) address and protect the rights of women?part 3 ap gov
The 14th Amendment address and protect the rights of women. In 1937, the argument that restricting the freedom of contract by establishing minimum pay for women and children violates due process was finally abandoned.
The 14th Amendment states that all people who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and who were born or naturalized there are citizens of both the nation and the state in which they currently reside. No State shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no State shall rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection under the law.
The 14th Amendment disregarded such supporting evidence, declared it was unable to see any rational connection between the statute and the legitimate goals of health or safety, and condemned the statute as an arbitrary restriction on the right to contract in order to invalidate comparable legislation, such as laws establishing minimum wages for women and children.
Even in the Lochner era, the due process clause was interpreted to allow the States to establish maximum hours regulations that applied to female employees and those in particular professions deemed to be physically demanding or otherwise deserving of special protection.
To learn more about the 14th Amendment, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/29793577
#SPJ4
what part of the constitution includes the equal protection clause and was used to decide the case brown v. board of education?
The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution contains the Equal Protection Clause, which was used in the decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This clause provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause was central to the landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. The Court held that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision paved the way for the desegregation of public schools and became a catalyst for the broader civil rights movement in the United States.
learn more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
what was the hypothesis of the stanford prison experiment
The hypothesis of the Stanford prison experiment was that the prisoners and guards were self-selecting.
Zimbardo and his team set out to examine the claim that the main driver of abusive conduct in jail is the intrinsic personality features of both prisoners and guards. The hypothesis was based on self-selecting which means that they were not restricted to any actions and were free to perform whatever they wanted.
A two-week jail simulation was advertised when participants were being sought out. It was assumed that participants who were given the role of a guard would act in a manner consistent with the role, and those who were given the role of a prisoner would act in that capacity.
The exchanges between the guards and the convicts were unrestricted, yet they were unfriendly or even demeaning.
While the convicts were meek and despondent, the guards started acting aggressively and abusive towards them.
To know more about Stanford prison experiment, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/3838365
#SPJ4
politics a) is basically the same thing as government. b) is generally free of conflict. c) is the process that determines what government does. d) does not affect most people daily.
Politics is the process that determines what government does. Thus, option C is correct.
Politics is defined as the collection of activities involved with group decision-making or other types of power interactions among individuals. Politics is the process through which the government decides what to do.
Power is defined in social science and politics as the social creation of an impact that influences the capacities, actions, beliefs, or behavior of actors. Political action may be useful in and of itself since it socializes and educates citizens, and popular involvement can put strong elites in check.
Politics contributes to the development of decent citizens and leaders. It teaches about the state's constitution, laws, and responsibilities.
Learn more about the politics, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
Politics is the process by which the actions of the government are decided. Option C is right as a result.
The term "politics" refers to a variety of activities including group decision-making or other forms of power dynamics. The method by which the government makes decisions is called politics.
In social science and politics, power is described as the social development of an impact that affects actors' abilities, actions, beliefs, or behavior. Political action may be beneficial in and of itself since it educates and socializes the populace and can restrain powerful elites.
Politics aids in the growth of moral citizens and leaders. It imparts knowledge of the state's constitution, laws, and obligations.
To learn more about politics, refer to:
brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
in which of the following cases did the supreme court block states from regulating labor practices, concluding that doing so would violate factory owners' property rights?
Lochner v. New York is the cases did the supreme court block states from regulating labor practices, concluding that doing so would violate factory owners' property rights.
What did the Supreme Court decide in McCulloch v Maryland 1819?In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court determined that Congress had the implied authority to establish the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and that the state of Maryland lacked the authority to tax the Bank.
The Barron ruling successfully stopped many state cases from being heard in federal courts. Additionally, it gave the states carte blanche to ignore the Bill of Rights in their interactions with their constituents, who were forced to rely on state laws and constitutions to defend their rights.
Thus, Lochner v. New York.
For more information about Supreme Court decide in McCulloch v Maryland 1819, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14339452
#SPJ1
michels's analysis of the iron law of oligarchy reflected the ideas of which of the following perspectives? multiple choice feminist conflict symbolic interactionist functionalist
Michels's analysis of the iron law of oligarchy reflected the ideas of the conflict perspective.
He argued that organizations are inevitably dominated by a small group of leaders who maintain power through manipulation and control.
Who was Michels, and what was the iron law of oligarchy?Robert Michels was a German-Italian sociologist who lived from 1876 to 1936. His most famous work is "Political Parties," published in 1911, in which he introduced the concept of the "iron law of oligarchy." This idea suggests that all organizations, no matter how democratic they may start out, will eventually develop a small group of leaders who hold power and make decisions on behalf of the rest of the members. Michels believed that this was an inevitable result of the complexity of modern organizations and the need for efficiency and stability.
To know more about Political Parties visit:
brainly.com/question/12401053
#SPJ1
codification of roman law has strongly influenced european laws of today?
The Justinian codification of Roman law has strongly influenced the European laws of today. Justinian's compilation served as the cornerstone of law in all civil law jurisdictions and had a significant impact on canon law.
A drive was made to codify the law in order to better predict how decisions would be made during a time of social turmoil when some Romans believed that judicial decisions were being made arbitrarily. As a result, in 451 BCE, a group of ten men known as the decemvirs was assembled to draft the first version of the law.
Law was one method Justinian used to achieve this unity. In the third century CE, Roman citizenship had been extended outside of Italy, making people who lived there "citizens of Rome" and subject to Roman civil law. In order to spread the historical legacy, culture, and language of Roman law throughout the empire, Justinian assembled a commission of judges to collect all the known Roman legal precedents into a single work.
The resurgence of formal law, or the "legal renaissance," which had a significant impact on Western Europe in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, was sparked by the rediscovery of this treatise.
To learn more about law, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/29555353
#SPJ4
The given question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows:
Whose codification of Roman law has strongly influenced European laws of today?
A. Marcus Aurelius
B. Constantine
C. Augustus Caesar
D. Justinian
Niloufar was executed because she believed she was associated with something illegal. (T/F)
True: Niloufar was executed because she believed she was associated with something illegal.
Because it is forbidden to kill a unmarried lady under the strict religious laws of Iran, Niloufar was sexually assaulted before being forcedly married off to a jail guard. After the execution, Niloufar's family received a dowry for the wedding, adding cruel insult to already horrific wounds. Thus, the given statement is correct.
Satrapi's autobiography of her youth in Iran before, during, and after the Islamic revolution is told in the graphic novel. Marjane Satrapi uses strong graphic and textual components on pages 61 and 146 of her book Persepolis to depict how Marji's initial belief in heroes transforms as she learns that every hero has to endure agony and sorrow.
To know more about illegal assault, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/2258888
#SPJ4
the 2012 fiscal cliff was avoided by the passage of ______.
The 2012 fiscal cliff was avoided by the passage of the American taxpayer relief act of 2012.
The government of United States 2012 fiscal cliff refers to the combined effect of numerous previously-enacted laws that came into effect altogether in January 2013, by increasing taxes and decreasing spending. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) was enacted and passed by the United States Congress on January 1, 2013, and was signed by the president of United State Barack Obama on January 2, 2013 . The act was passed as a approach to combine spending cuts and hiking taxes and to prevent most of the sunsetting tax from expiring. The act permanently fixed the Alternative Minimum Taxes.
Know more about "fiscal cliff" visit
brainly.com/question/28804281
#SPJ4
1. how is the ratignolle marriage a contrast to the pontellier marriage?
In Kate Chopin's novel "The Awakening," the Ratignolle marriage is presented as a contrast to the Pontellier marriage in several ways:
Role of the HusbandGender RolesThe Ratignolle marriage is shown as a contrast to the Pontellier marriage in numerous ways in Kate Chopin's work "The Awakening":
The Husband's Role: Edna's husband, Leonce Pontellier, is revealed to be more engaged in business and social activities than in his wife and family. In contrast, Adele's husband, Alcee Ratignolle, is presented as being highly concerned in his family life as well as his wife's emotional and physical well-being.
Gender Roles: The Pontellier marriage follows traditional gender norms, with Leonce as the dominant spouse and Edna expected to fulfil her role as a faithful wife and mother. In contrast, the Ratignolle marriage is portrayed as more egalitarian, with Alcee and Adele cooperating as equal partners to produce a happy and successful marriage.
For such more question on Ratignolle :
https://brainly.com/question/19871938
#SPJ4
How can I get a form SSA-1099/1042S, Social Security Benefit Statement?
One can get a form SSA-1099/1042S, Social Security Benefit Statement Using your personal my Social Security account, and if you don't already have an account, you can create one online or by Calling at 1-800-772-1213.
A Social Security 1099 or 1042S Benefit Statement, also called an SSA-1099 or SSA-1042S, is a form of tax that shows the total amount of benefits a person receives from Social Security in the previous year. It is informed through mails out in each January of every year to people who can receive benefits and tells about the amount of social income to report to the IRS on the tax returns. Non-citizens who live outside United States get 1042S Benefit Statement instead of 1099. The replacement is probably available after 1st of February for the previous tax year. This social benefit is not available for people who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Know more about "Social Security Benefit Statement" visit
brainly.com/question/28803551
#SPJ4
What did the investigations into the Michael Brown shooting conclude?
The grand jury declined to indict Wilson on any charges, while the St. Louis County prosecutor's office found insufficient evidence to bring charges against him.
The investigations into the shooting of Michael Brown, an 18-year-old black man, by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, reached different conclusions depending on the agency conducting the investigation. The initial investigation by the Ferguson Police Department concluded that Officer Darren Wilson, who shot Brown, acted in self-defense and that the shooting was justified. However, this conclusion was widely criticized by activists and civil rights groups who argued that it was biased and incomplete. Subsequent investigations by the St. Louis County prosecutor's office, the U.S. Department of Justice, and a grand jury reached different conclusions. The grand jury declined to indict Wilson on any charges, while the St. Louis County prosecutor's office found insufficient evidence to bring charges against him. However, the U.S. Department of Justice conducted a separate investigation and released a report in 2015 that found a pattern of racially biased policing by the Ferguson Police Department and other systemic issues in the city's criminal justice system. The report also found no evidence to contradict Wilson's claim that he acted in self-defense during the encounter with Brown. Overall, the investigations into the Michael Brown shooting were controversial and exposed ongoing concerns about racial bias and police violence in the United States.
To know more about the grand jury, click here: https://brainly.com/question/18726345
#SPJ4
The Bill of Rights: What Does it Say?
Ten of the first amendments to the Constitution together make up the Bill of Rights. Regarding their government, it explains how Americans are entitled to certain fundamental rights.
The rights to freedom of expression, of the press, and of religion are ensured. Any jurisdiction not granted to the federal government is reserved for the people or the States, and it lays out guidelines for the administration of justice in conformity with the law. The Constitution further states that "the mention of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be regarded as a rejection or denigration of those preserved by the people." The First Amendment guarantees a number of rights, including the freedom to petition the government, form or join a group for a protest or other purpose, and the freedom to express one's political views.
Learn more about fundamental here:
https://brainly.com/question/28941950
#SPJ4
Which courts decide more than 95 percent of the nation’s legal cases?
answer choices
State courts
Supreme court
Small claims court
District courts
the u.s. government says a surveillance balloon from what country was found flying across the united states this year 2023 and was later shot down?
Uni Soviet
China
Japan
South Korea
The U.S. government says a surveillance balloon from China country was found flying across the united states this week and was later shot down.
It included collecting pod equipment, including cutting-edge technology that could capture communications signals and other sensitive information, positioned on the metal truss hanging below the balloon, according to government sources.
According to military officials, there was a disproportionate risk that people might be injured by debris when the balloon was over land. An F-22 Raptor from Virginia's 1st Fighter Wing's Langley Air Force Base launched one AIM-9X Sidewinder missile at the balloon.
The purported Chinese surveillance balloon is shot down in the waters off Surfside Beach, South Carolina.
To learn more about surveillance https://brainly.com/question/15136673
#SPJ4
Who was declared the rightful governor of Georgia in a special election in 1948?
Herman Talmadge was the rightful governor of Georgia in a special election in 1948.
The "three governors issue" in Georgia in 1946–1947, which was sparked by Eugene Talmadge's death as governor–elect, was one of the more peculiar political spectacles in American political history.
Upon Talmadge's passing, his supporters came up with a scheme that let the Georgia legislature choose a governor in January 1947. The newly elected lieutenant governor, Melvin E. Thompson, claimed the position of governor after the General Assembly chose Talmadge's son Herman Talmadge as governor.
Also, the previous governor, Ellis Arnall, refused to step down. Ultimately, the dispute was resolved by the Georgia Supreme Court.
The Georgia Supreme Court concluded in March 1947 that Melvin E. Thompson was the legitimate acting governor of the state because he was the lieutenant governor-elect and ran for re-election.
To know more about Herman Talmadge, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15003731
#SPJ4
