What is the feminist theory in politics?

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The primary legal responsibility of a business is to obey the law. This means that businesses must operate within the legal framework established by the government, including complying with relevant laws, regulations, and rules. Businesses must also fulfill their legal obligations, such as paying taxes, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, and complying with labor laws and environmental regulations. While businesses have many other responsibilities, such as fulfilling their obligations to customers and stakeholders, obeying the law is the foundation of any ethical and responsible business practice.

There is no cap on punitive damages in Title VII cases based on discrimination other than race.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Under Title VII, an employee who has been subjected to unlawful employment discrimination can seek remedies such as back pay, front pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages.

While there are caps on punitive damages in some other types of cases, there is no cap on punitive damages in Title VII cases based on discrimination other than race.

Learn more about punitive damages at:

https://brainly.com/question/15145458

#SPJ1

The Truman Doctrine was an American foreign policy announced by President Harry S. Truman in 1947. It declared that the United States would support Greece and Turkey in their effort to resist Communism and Soviet expansion.

The doctrine, which was a part of the greater Cold War conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union, was prompted by Soviet threats to Greece and Turkey after World War II.

The theory sought to stop the development of Communism by giving Greece, Turkey, and any other country under Soviet danger economic and military support.

The Truman Doctrine, which sought to stop the expansion of Communism in Europe and the Middle East, was successful in its endeavour, and it is still a crucial component of American foreign policy today.

To learn more about foreign policy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14238816

#SPJ4

The appropriate motion for either of the parties to file is MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT.

Motion for summary judgement is a request made that begs a court to determine a case that no factual issue are in dispute and that the case is to be decided in favor of one party or the other based on the legal issues surrounding the case. This judgement involves a court ruling a case on at least one claim.

In this question, since both are in agreement as to what happened during the accident, summary judgement will be made on their interpretation of the state law affecting who had the right of way when they collided.

To know more about JUDGEMENT visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16184384

#SPJ1

The right to freedom of religion,the right to due process,the right to vote and the right to freedom of speech  are included in the Bill of Rights found in the US Constitution.

A bill is a proposed law that must be approved by a legislature before it can become a law. It is a draft of a legislative proposal that is introduced in a legislature and, if it passes, it can become a law. The process of a bill becoming a law is known as the legislative process and it involves several steps. First, the bill must be proposed in either the house or the senate by a legislator. Secondly, the bill must be debated and voted upon by the members of the legislature. If the bill passes both chambers, it is then sent to the president to be signed into law. If the president signs the bill, it becomes a law and is enforced by the government.

To learn more about Bill

https://brainly.com/question/29550065

#SPJ1

Order in which they received the right to vote from earliest to most recent: white males with property -> black males -> women -> people aged 18-20.

The order in which different groups received the right to vote reflects the shifting social and political landscape of the country. White males with property were the first group to receive the right to vote, with the 19th Amendment finally granting women the right to vote in 1920.

Finally, in 1971, the 26th Amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18, giving people aged 18-20 the right to vote. The struggle for voting rights continues today, with ongoing efforts to combat voter suppression and expand access to the ballot box for all Americans.

To know more about vote , click here.

https://brainly.com/question/30359890

#SPJ4

The party that ultimately determines what constitutes the fair use of tests in the hiring process is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

This is because the EEOC is responsible for ensuring that all hiring practices and procedures comply with federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment. The EEOC reviews and approves any testing procedures that an employer plans to use for hiring purposes, and ensures that any such testing procedures are designed to accurately measure job-relevant skills and knowledge rather than the candidate's personal characteristics such as age, gender or race.

The EEOC has also established standards for the use of criminal history background checks in the hiring process in order to ensure that they do not result in unnecessary discrimination against individuals with criminal histories.

To know more about Equal Employment Opportunity Commission go to

https://brainly.com/question/17198465

#SPJ4

Laws are the formal expression of governmental decisions. Men and women should esteem the right more highly than the law, in Thoreau's opinion, because the latter may not represent the former given that it is determined by numerical criteria rather than moral standards.

Resistance to Civil Government, an article by Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862), introduced the concept of civil disobedience, which holds that people should not allow any government to intrude upon their consciences.

Thoreau argues that it is the responsibility of conscientious individuals to act in order to avoid being instruments of the government's injustice, for as by refusing to pay taxes in the face of an unjust law.

Thoreau's question, "Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?," is an example of this kind of thinking. It has negative effects on people's attitudes towards their governments and has legal repercussions.

To know more about Laws

https://brainly.com/question/14661439

#SPJ4

According to "The Relationship Between Campaign Contributions and Voting in Congress," politicians would never want the public to know that their actions are influenced by financial contributions.

This section discusses the laws, rules, and standards of conduct governing three aspects of campaign or political contributions: solicitation of contributions, receipt and acceptance of contributions, and the general prohibition against acting in one's official capacity for political reasons. A special interest group (SIG) is a community within a larger organisation that has a shared interest in advancing a specific area of knowledge, learning, or technology, and where members collaborate to affect or produce solutions within their specific field, and may communicate, meet, and organise conferences. The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), an academic and professional computer society, coined the term in 1961.

To learn more about contributions:

https://brainly.com/question/15317541

#SPJ4

A court that follows stare decisis may make a decision to not use a rule of common law from an earlier case in the situations when the court distinguishes the decisions given in the earlier case. Therefore, the option B holds true.

The doctrine of stare decisis can be taken into interpretation as the provision under law wherein the earlier judgments of the court in similar cases are given priority when making a decision. However, this doctrine does not apply when there are differences in the decisions made by the earlier courts.

Learn more about stare decisis here:

https://brainly.com/question/21085371

#SPJ4

The given statement " a protocol is a set of rules that govern the format of messages that computers exchange." is True.

A protocol is a set of rules that governs the format and communication of data between different devices or systems, including computers. In computer networking, protocols define the rules and procedures for communication between devices, including how data is transmitted, received, and processed.

This includes the format of messages that computers exchange, as well as the procedures for handling errors, establishing connections, and terminating connections. Common network protocols include TCP/IP, HTTP, SMTP, FTP, and others. Each of these protocols defines a specific set of rules that govern the behavior of devices and systems in a network.

To know more about protocol here

https://brainly.com/question/27581708

#SPJ4

The law that was passed by Congress following the second Selma March is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

In addition to allowing federal workers to register voters in southern states, this historic legislation abolished the use of literacy tests for voter registration.

The Act also included provisions to safeguard African Americans' right to vote by establishing federal oversight of state election procedures and outlawing any discriminatory actions that might limit or deny that right.

Additionally, it gave the U.S. Attorney General permission to file cases against governments that deprive its residents of their right to vote through the use of discriminatory methods.

This Act was a significant turning point in the history of civil rights and had a significant impact on preserving African Americans' ability to vote.

To learn more about Congress visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16880802

#SPJ4

Answer:

Lower voting age

Explanation:

The 26th Amendment to the US Constitution was passed in 1971 to ensure that young Americans who were being drafted to fight in the Vietnam War could vote. It lowered the minimum voting age to 18.

In order to counteract the current impacts of previous behaviors, policies, or hurdles to equal employment opportunity, affirmative action is positive activity that is conducted sincerely and diligently.

The OFCCP regulations define affirmative action as the duty on the part of the contractor to take steps to ensure that applicants are hired and employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, or disability.

According to OFCCP regulations, affirmative action refers to a contractor's duty to take measures to guarantee that applicants are hired and workers are treated fairly while working, regardless of a person's race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or gender.

To know more about employment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1361941

#SPJ1

The judge decides whether there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the crime for which he or she is charged, during the Preliminary hearing.

Five different sorts of legal hearings might occur during a criminal trial:

Learn more about hearings during a criminal trial here:

brainly.com/question/20318649

#SPJ4

For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a corporation is considered to be a citizen of each and every state in which it has been incorporated, and the state in which it has its principal place of operations of its business. Therefore, the option A holds true.

A corporation has a principal place of business in the state where its headquarters are usually registered. However, since it might operate in many states, it is considered as a citizen of each and every state that it operates in. This concept of citizenship is considered for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction.

Learn more about diversity jurisdiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/14598342

#SPJ4

Identity theft is when someone else uses your personal information to commit fraud.

Identity theft is a type of fraud in which someone steals another person's personal information and uses it to impersonate them. This stolen information may include a person's name, date of birth, social security number, credit card numbers, bank account information, and other identifying details.
The thief may use the stolen information to open new credit accounts, take out loans, make purchases, or commit other fraudulent activities in the victim's name. This can result in financial losses, damage to the victim's credit score, and even legal issues.
Identity theft can occur through a variety of means, including phishing scams, data breaches, stolen wallets or mail, and even social engineering tactics. It can be difficult to detect and resolve, often requiring victims to contact their financial institutions, credit bureaus, and law enforcement agencies to report the fraud and take steps to prevent further damage.

To learn more about, fraud, click here,
https://brainly.com/question/30715266

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete. The complete questions is given as:

_____ is when someone else uses your personal information to commit fraud.

The Sherman antitrust act was passed by the congress to prevent merger of companies and restrained competition which can interfere in the free market and disturb free competition. Congress took it as a opportunity to divert people criticism of the government but was not likely given power. It was not enforced and later weakened by the courts of justice.

The Sherman antitrust act was passed in the United States in the year 1890 by the congress, which underlines importance of competitiveness in the market, outlawed trusts, monopolies, and cartels to increase economic competitiveness in the free market. The act prevented mergers of companies to form a monopoly protecting fair and healthy competitive behavior in the market but it was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as trust, monopoly, combination etc.

Know more about "Sherman antitrust act" visit

brainly.com/question/838791

#SPJ4

It is largely believed that the property-related criminal activities increases significantly due to the downturn led to the American economy.

The phase of economic downturn within the American society was largely evident during the times of different social crises that the society went through. In fact, the economic downturn led to a downfall in the prices of properties, and thus, many people turned into criminals for undertaking activities related to property-related crimes. Thus, it may be said that economic downturn had a significant impact on the property-related crime.

Learn more about economic downturn here:

https://brainly.com/question/3762037?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Option (a) is correct. When eastern Europeans revolted in the 1950s and 1960s, the soviet union responded with military force.

In the 1950s, the Stalinist economic system began to show signs of stagnation in both the USSR and Eastern Europe. That process was become more critical in the latter. That means the communist governments imposed by the Soviet Union could not deliver on their promise of a better life which was their only claim to legitimacy. There were some limited Soviet experiments in economic reform in the mid-1960s but reform implementation went much further in Hungary than anywhere else in the bloc in the beginning of 1968. Soviet Union always affected the satellites in Eastern Europe.

To learn more about Soviet Union

https://brainly.com/question/1310325

#SPJ4

The correct question is,

When Eastern Europeans revolted in the 1950s and 1960s

A) the Soviets responded with military force.

B) they were able to break away and form their own governments.

C) the Soviets responded by sending political advisors.

D) the Americans built a wall in Berlin

Based on the excerpt, the accurate conclusion is:

C. The Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying due process; the Fifth Amendment had been applied only to the national government.

Generally, The Fifth Amendment's due process clause was originally applied only to the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment extended this protection to state governments as well.

The excerpt from the Fourteenth Amendment specifically states that "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

This clause prevents state governments from depriving individuals of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law, which includes the right to a fair trial and other legal protections.

The Fifth Amendment's due process clause, on the other hand, only applies to the federal government.

Read more about Fifth Amendment's

https://brainly.com/question/29894002

#SPJ1

The claim seems to be accurate. That implies that any attempts to register duplicates (more than once) for a given market would be rejected.

Depending on the situation, the word "market" might indicate many things. A market is typically used to describe a certain business or sector where products or services are bought and sold. It may also refer to the region or demographic segment where a good or service is marketed or offered for sale. In business and economics, the idea of a market is crucial because it influences supply and demand, pricing, and competition. In some situations, the word "market" can also refer to a system or platform where transactions are carried out, such a stock exchange or an online marketplace. Creating a winning company plan and achieving commercial success require an understanding of the market.

Learn more about market here:

https://brainly.com/question/13627328

#SPJ4

The statement that the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 gave nearly all power to the governor and included a bill of rights is False.

The Virginia State Constitution of 1776 did establish a strong governorship, but it did not give nearly all power to the governor. Instead, it created a system of checks and balances between the governor, the legislature, and the judiciary.

The judiciary was also given the power of judicial review, allowing it to interpret the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. Additionally, the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 did include a Bill of Rights, which enumerated a set of individual rights and protections, including freedom of speech and religion

Find out more on the Virginia State Constitution of 1776 at https://brainly.com/question/5800706

#SPJ1

The US Constitution reflected specific concerns of southern states by including provisions that protected their interests.

Such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which allowed southern states to count enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining representation in Congress, and the Fugitive Slave Clause, which required northern states to return escaped slaves to their southern owners.

Southern states were concerned about losing power in the federal government due to their smaller populations compared to northern states. The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed this concern by giving southern states a greater number of representatives in Congress, as enslaved individuals were counted towards the population even though they were not able to vote or participate in government.

Southern states were also concerned about the possibility of enslaved individuals escaping to the North. The Fugitive Slave Clause addressed this concern by requiring northern states to cooperate in the capture and return of escaped slaves to their southern owners. This provision was particularly important to southern states as the institution of slavery was a key component of their economy and way of life.

In addition to these specific provisions, the US Constitution also protected the institution of slavery more broadly by including language that prevented Congress from banning the international slave trade for 20 years after the Constitution's ratification and by including a provision that prevented states from interfering with the "migration" of enslaved individuals between states.

Overall, the US Constitution reflected the concerns of southern states by including provisions that protected their interests in terms of representation in Congress and the protection of the institution of slavery. These provisions ultimately played a role in the tensions between northern and southern states that led to the Civil War.

learn more about constitution at :

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ4

When Mary thinks it is moral to employ a hiring technique that is unlawful in the United States in a nation where it is acceptable, she is probably mistaken.

What word best describes employ?

Use and use are frequent synonyms for employ. Employ implies the employment of a person or thing that is available but idle, inactive, or disengaged, even though all three words have the same meaning—"to put into service especially to gain an end”—to achieve. The business has 18 employees. In the tourism sector, there are around 3,000 local employees. Her first spouse had worked for a chemical manufacturer.

Know more about  nation Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9015813

#SPJ1

The statement is partially correct.

The term "government" typically refers to the institutions and processes through which a society or political entity makes decisions and exercises authority over its citizens. This can include a variety of actors, such as elected officials, bureaucrats, and courts, who are responsible for enacting laws and policies, enforcing them, and resolving disputes.

While some governments may be established to strengthen and perpetuate the power of a particular ruler or ruling elite, not all governments are designed in this way. Many governments are created with the goal of serving the broader interests of the population, such as protecting their security, promoting economic development, and upholding human rights.

The term "state" is often used to refer to a more complex form of government that has a defined territory, a permanent population, and a centralized authority that exercises control over that territory.

To learn more about rights click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30349401

#SPJ4

Halal refers to food and beverages that are permissible according to Islamic dietary laws.

In general, halal food must meet the following criteria:

   The animal must be slaughtered by a Muslim in the name of Allah.

   The animal must be healthy and free from disease at the time of slaughter.

   The animal must be killed with a swift cut to the throat with a sharp knife.

   The blood must be completely drained from the animal.

   The meat must be handled and prepared according to Islamic guidelines.

Some common examples of halal food include:

   Meat from animals that have been slaughtered according to Islamic guidelines (beef, lamb, chicken, goat, etc.)

   Fish and seafood

   Fruits and vegetables

   Dairy products (milk, cheese, yogurt, etc.) that are made with halal ingredients and do not contain any animal-derived rennet

   Grains and legumes (rice, wheat, barley, lentils, etc.)

   Eggs from chickens that have been fed a halal diet

It's important to note that not all food products are automatically halal, and some may contain ingredients or additives that are not permissible under Islamic dietary laws. Therefore, it's important to check the ingredients list or look for halal certification labels to ensure that a particular food product is halal approved.

For such more question on halal food

https://brainly.com/question/30787965

#SPJ4

Since the unanimous ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), the Supreme Court has maintained that public officials cannot get restitution for libel without demonstrating genuine malice in their statements.

What was the ruling in New York?

Bruen. The Heller decision expanded the right to possess a firearm for self-defense beyond the home by finding New York's concealed carry legislation unconstitutional. The existing law requires that applicants for Federal firearms dealer licenses certify that secure gun storage or safety devices will be available at any location where firearms are sold under the license to non-licensed individuals. This rule amends ATF regulations to take into account this requirement.

Know more about Supreme Court Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ1

In the criminal justice process in the United States, a judge typically determines whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed at the preliminary hearing stage.

During the preliminary hearing, the prosecutor presents evidence to the judge in order to demonstrate that there is probable cause to believe that the accused committed a crime.

The judge will review the evidence presented by the prosecutor, and if the judge finds that there is probable cause, the case will move forward to trial.

It's important to note that in some cases, a grand jury may determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, rather than a judge at a preliminary hearing.

In this process, the grand jury hears evidence presented by the prosecutor and decides whether there is enough evidence to formally charge the accused with a crime.

To know more about preliminary hearing stage here:

https://brainly.com/question/13623782

#SPJ4

In order for a public figure to obtain a damage award under libel laws, they must prove that the defendant made a false and defamatory statement about them.

That the statement was made with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth, and that the statement caused them harm or damage.

The actual malice standard means that the defendant made the statement with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard for whether it was true or false. This standard applies to public figures, such as politicians, celebrities, and other individuals who have become well-known in the public eye. It is higher than the standard applied to private individuals, who only need to show that the defendant was negligent in making the false statement.

The harm or damage that a public figure must prove in order to obtain a damage award can take many forms, including damage to their reputation, emotional distress, or financial harm. Public figures may also be required to prove that the false statement caused them to suffer specific, quantifiable losses, such as lost business opportunities or damage to their career prospects.

Overall, the actual malice standard makes it more difficult for public figures to win libel cases, as they must prove that the defendant made the false statement with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. However, if a public figure is able to meet this standard and prove that they suffered harm as a result of the false statement, they may be able to obtain a damage award under libel laws.

For such more question on defendant

https://brainly.com/question/14661448

#SPJ4