What is the first step toward becoming a U.S. Supreme Court judge, according to Article III of the Constitution?

a general election

nomination by the President

judicial review

appointment by a member of Congress

The procedure that the police officers used in the situation, to ask Josue to exit the vehicle was C. probable cause searching

Probable cause is a legal standard that must be met before law enforcement officers can make an arrest, conduct a search, or take other similar actions. It refers to a level of suspicion that is based on facts and circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed, or that certain evidence of a crime will be found in a specific place.

This standard is used to protect citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, and is an essential element of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

This is therefore what the police officers used in asking Josue to exit the vehicle for searching.

Find out more on probable cause at https://brainly.com/question/28399684

#SPJ1

Answer:

C. are settled out of court.

Explanation:

The majority of police litigation cases are settled out of court, often because the costs of going to trial are too high for either party. Settlements also allow for more flexibility in terms of providing compensation and making adjustments to policies or procedures in order to minimize similar legal disputes in the future.

The government of the U.S. represents its people properly as it follows a representative form of government, where the elected members represent the citizens.

A government is a system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary. Government is a means by which organizational policies are enforced, as well as a mechanism for determining policy. In many countries, the government has a kind of constitution, a statement of its governing principles and philosophy.

A government is a system to govern a state or community.

Learn more about government, here:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

Answer:

The pluralist perspective recognizes that different groups in society may have different perspectives on what should be considered criminal behavior. This can lead to debate and disagreement over what actions should be criminalized and what actions should not be.

One way that this debate is resolved is through the democratic process. In a democratic society, laws and criminal codes are created and amended through the participation of citizens and their elected representatives. This allows for different perspectives and opinions to be heard and considered in the law-making process.

Another way that debate is resolved is through the court system. The court system is responsible for interpreting and applying criminal laws and codes. In cases where there is a disagreement about the interpretation or application of a law, the court system can provide clarification and guidance. For example, when there is disagreement about the meaning of the term "criminal behavior", courts may interpret the law in a way that takes into account the diversity of society and the different perspectives that exist.

Additionally, the debate can be resolved through the use of discretion by law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and judges. Discretion refers to the ability of these actors to make decisions about how to enforce the law in a particular situation. They can take into account the specific circumstances of a case and the diverse perspectives of different groups in society when deciding how to proceed.

Overall, resolving debate over criminal behavior in a pluralist society may involve a combination of these approaches, including democratic process, court interpretation and discretion. It is important to note that the process of resolving debate over criminal behavior is ongoing, as society's values and perspectives continue to evolve over time.

Answer:

Explanation:

If you get involved in three crashes within 36 months and you don't take care of the initial penalties, you could face a license suspension. Depending on the severity of the crashes, you could also face fines, points on your license, and/or higher insurance premiums. Additionally, if the crashes are considered to be more serious (such as a hit-and-run), you could face criminal charges.

On Thursday around 4 p.m., a woman's body is discovered laying on her back on the kitchen floor. Nothing is visibly angry. On the body, flies and their eggs can be seen.

4.7 hours have passed since his death. 98.6 - 91.6 is 7 / 1.5, or 4.6, or about 5 hours. In the dead of winter, a body's temperature is 91.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

Rectal temperature is deducted from the average body temperature of 98 degrees Fahrenheit since the algorithm estimates that the body loses 1.5 degrees every hour. The period since death is roughly calculated by dividing the difference between the two by 1.5.

To Know more about   kitchen floor Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3687038

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The answer to this question is complicated and depends on many factors. It is important to consider the context of the protest, the nature of the protest, and the actions taken by the organizers.

In general, the organizers of a protest should be held responsible for the safety of life and property. This means that the organizers should be aware of and take steps to mitigate potential risks, such as ensuring that the protest is peaceful, providing adequate security measures, and monitoring the crowd.

However, organizers should not be held accountable for any violence that takes place during a protest. While an organizer's speech may be inflammatory and may incite violence, this does not mean that they should be automatically held responsible for any violence that occurs.

In cases of extreme violence, the organizers may be held accountable, especially if they are found to have encouraged or participated in the violence. However, the burden of proof for such a case would be high, and it is important to consider the full context of the situation before determining if the organizers should be held accountable.

Answer: Its false i took the test

Explanation dont listin to that guy  uptop

The statement All organisms use different genetic information is False.

All living organisms share the same genetic code, which is the set of instructions that tells cells how to make proteins.

Adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T) are the four nucleotides that make up this code. The sequence of amino acids in proteins is determined by the arrangement of these nucleotides in DNA.

But not every organism have the same genes. Genes are sections of DNA that contain the protein coding information. An organism's DNA contains a variety of different types and numbers of genes. For instance, whereas bacteria only have roughly 4,000 genes, humans have about 20,000.

The diversity of life on Earth is a result of genetic variations among various creatures. These variations might be minor—like a single nucleotide change—or substantial, like the difference between the genomes of humans and chimpanzees.

Life depends on the genetic material that all living things share. It serves as the manual for constructing and caring for organs, tissues, and cells. Additionally, it affects immunity, development, and reproduction.

Life would not be possible as we know it today without the shared genetic code.

To know more about organisms:

https://brainly.com/question/13278945

#SPJ2

Answer:

It brings the realization that all of the gang members were children at one point.

Explanation:

People sometimes forget that gang members started out just like the rest of us. Some came from decent homes and families, others from poverty and lack of parental guidance. Something caused them to join, it may have been friends, the location of their homes, or even just wanting to be a part of something. Looking at the photos, it makes you realize what could have been, some could even remind you of someone you know.

Answer:

The court generally does not favor the submission of last-minute evidence during a trial. This is because trials are typically scheduled well in advance and both parties have had ample time to gather and present evidence. In most cases, evidence must be disclosed and made available to the opposing party well before the trial commences. This allows both parties to review and prepare for the evidence that will be presented.

However, in some instances, new evidence may become available after the trial has begun, such as when a previously unknown witness comes forward. In such cases, the court has discretion to decide whether or not to admit the new evidence. The court will take into consideration factors such as the relevance and materiality of the new evidence to the case, whether it was discovered through due diligence, and whether its admission would be unfairly prejudicial to the opposing party.

It is worth noting that different jurisdictions may have different rules for both criminal and civil trials, therefore, it's important to check the specific rules and regulations of the jurisdiction where the trial is taking place. It may be different from state to state though.