What is the highest number of Saturdays that any year has ever had?

The complete parametric equations for the line through the given points are: x(t) = 7 - 7t, y(t) = 1 + 2t, and z(t) = -6 + 11t

To find the parametric equations of the line through the points (7, 1, -6) and (0, 3, 5), we can use the following formula:

P(t) = P_0 + t(P_1 - P_0)

where P(t) is a point on the line, P_0 is the initial point (7, 1, -6), P_1 is the terminal point (0, 3, 5), and t is a parameter.

Substituting the given values, we get:

P(t) = (7, 1, -6) + t[(0, 3, 5) - (7, 1, -6)]

Simplifying, we get:

P(t) = (7, 1, -6) + t(-7, 2, 11)

Expanding the equation for P(t) in terms of x, y, and z, we get:

x(t) = 7 - 7t

y(t) = 1 + 2t

z(t) = -6 + 11t

Therefore, the complete parametric equations for the line through the given points are:

x(t) = 7 - 7t

y(t) = 1 + 2t

z(t) = -6 + 11t

Learn more about parametric equations

brainly.com/question/28537985

#SPJ11

An altitude of an isosceles triangle is not always the median of the triangle. False.

A median of a triangle is a line segment that connects a vertex of the triangle to the midpoint of the opposite side. An altitude of a triangle is a line segment from a vertex perpendicular to the opposite side.

In an isosceles triangle, where two sides are congruent, the altitude from the vertex opposite the base bisects the base, creating two congruent line segments. However, this does not mean that the altitude is also a median, as the midpoint of the base may not coincide with the midpoint of the altitude.

In some cases, such as when the isosceles triangle is also an equilateral triangle, all three medians and all three altitudes coincide. But in general, an altitude of an isosceles triangle is not always a median.

Learn more about equilateral triangle

https://brainly.com/question/3461022

#SPJ4

The expected value of standard deviation is 0.8 and The answer in (a) differs from the conventional mean of 1.5 because the conventional mean calculates the average without considering the probability distribution.

The expected value (E(X)) and standard deviation (SD) of X are 1.4 and 0.8, respectively.

To find the expected value, E(X), we use the formula E(X) = Σ[x*P(X)]. Calculate it as follows:
E(X) = (0 * 0.1) + (1 * 0.3) + (2 * 0.4) + (3 * 0.2) = 0 + 0.3 + 0.8 + 0.6 = 1.4

To find the standard deviation, first find the variance, Var(X) = Σ[(x - E(X))^2 * P(X)]:
Var(X) = ((0 - 1.4)²* 0.1) + ((1 - 1.4)² * 0.3) + ((2 - 1.4)² * 0.4) + ((3 - 1.4)² * 0.2) = 0.56

Now, find the standard deviation: SD = √Var(X) = √0.56 = 0.8.

The expected value, however, takes into account the probability distribution, which results in a more accurate representation of the data.

To know more about standard deviation click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14747159#

#SPJ11

If the surface area of a sphere is 1, then its radius is √(1/4π) = 0.2821 (approximate to four decimal places).

The surface area of a hemisphere with the same radius is half that of the sphere since it only covers half of the surface area.

So, the surface area (including the base area) of the hemisphere would be:

2π(0.2821)^2 + π(0.2821)^2 = 0.5 + 0.25π = 0.7854 (approximate to four decimal places).

Therefore, the surface area (including the base area) of the hemisphere with the same radius is approximately 0.7854 square units.
Hi! To find the surface area of a hemisphere with the same radius as a sphere, we'll first determine the radius using the sphere's surface area formula, and then apply the hemisphere's surface area formula.

1. Sphere's surface area formula: A = 4πr²
Given surface area A = 1, we'll solve for radius r:

1 = 4πr²
Divide both sides by 4π:
1 / 4π = r²

2. Find r:
r = √(1 / 4π)

3. Hemisphere's surface area formula (including base area): A_hemisphere = 3πr²
Substitute r with the value we found:

A_hemisphere = 3π(√(1 / 4π))²

4. Simplify the expression:
A_hemisphere = 3π(1 / 4π)
A_hemisphere = (3/4)π

So, the surface area (including the base area) of the hemisphere with the same radius as the given sphere is (3/4)π.

know more

https://brainly.com/question/31464920

#SPJ11

The series b_n diverges (the harmonic series), we conclude that the given series also diverges.

The given series is of the form 1, 6, 1, 13, 1, 20, 1, 27, 1, 34, ...

We notice that every other term of the series is 1, while the remaining terms increase by 7 each time. Hence, we can write the nth term of the series as:

[tex]a_n = 1 + 7[(n-1)/2], for\ n = 1, 2, 3, ...[/tex]

Now, we can use the limit comparison test to determine the convergence of the series. We compare the given series with the series [tex]b_n = 1/n[/tex], which is a p-series with p = 1.

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity of [tex](a_n/b_n)[/tex], we get:

[tex]lim (n- > \infty) [(1 + 7[(n-1)/2])/n] \\= lim (n- > \infty) [1/n + 7/2] = 7/2[/tex]

Since the limit is a positive, finite constant, and not equal to zero, we conclude that the given series and the series [tex]b_n[/tex] either both converge or both diverge.

To Learn More About Diverges

https://brainly.com/question/28452298

#SPJ11

The mode would not decrease if the number 56 were added to the data set because the mode is equal to 65.

In Mathematics and Statistics, a mode can be defined as a statistical term that is used to denote the value that appears most often or occurs repeatedly in a given data set i.e the number with highest number of frequency in a given data set.

In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the median differs from the mode of a given data set. In conclusion, the mode of the given data set is equal to 65 and it would remain the same even if the number 56 were added to the data set.

Read more on median here: brainly.com/question/452652

#SPJ1

The Laplace transform of the function. 1, 0 π t<π t < oo 16. f(t) = 10 is [tex](-1/s) (e^{(-s\pi)} - 1)[/tex].

The Laplace transform of a function f(t) is defined as:

F(s) = L{f(t)} = ∫[0,∞) [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] f(t) dt

We need to find the Laplace transform of f(t) = 1, 0 ≤ t < π and f(t) = 0, t ≥ π.

Using the definition of the Laplace transform, we have:

F(s) = ∫[0,∞) [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] f(t) dt

= ∫[0,π] [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex] dt (since f(t) = 1 for 0 ≤ t < π)

= [-1/s [tex]e^{(-st)[/tex]]_[0,π]

= (-1/s) ([tex]e^{(-s\pi)} - 1[/tex])

So, the Laplace transform of f(t) is (-1/s) ([tex]e^{(-s\pi )} - 1[/tex]).

Know more about Laplace transform here:

https://brainly.com/question/31041670

#SPJ11

The probabilities are 0.6288, 0.7457, 0.2332, and  0.4491.

Given that X is an exponentially distributed random variable with λ=0.47, we can use the formula for the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of an exponential distribution to find the probabilities we need.

A. P(X > 1) = 1 - P(X ≤ 1) = 1 - (1 - e^(-0.47*1)) = e^(-0.47) ≈ 0.6288

B. P(X > 0.36) = 1 - P(X ≤ 0.36) = 1 - (1 - e^(-0.47*0.36)) = e^(-0.47*0.36) ≈ 0.7457

C. P(X < 0.47) = 1 - P(X ≥ 0.47) = 1 - e^(-0.47*0.47) ≈ 0.2332

D. P(0.32 < X < 2.46) = P(X > 0.32) - P(X > 2.46) = (1 - e^(-0.47*0.32)) - (1 - e^(-0.47*2.46)) ≈ 0.4491

Know more about probabilities here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The easiest order of integration is ∫∫∫[tex](2z/x^2 + z^2)[/tex]dxdydz.

Hi! I'd be happy to help you with your triple integral question. The easiest order of integration for the integral E [tex](2z/x^2 + z^2)[/tex]dV, where E={(x,y,z)| 0 <= x <= z, 1/3 <= y <= 1, y <= z <= 1}, would be integrating with respect to x first, then y, and finally z.

Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Since the bounds for x are given by 0 <= x <= z, it's easiest to integrate with respect to x first.

2. The bounds for y are given by 1/3 <= y <= 1, so integrating with respect to y comes next.

3. Finally, the bounds for z are given by y <= z <= 1, which makes it convenient to integrate with respect to z last.

So, the easiest order of integration for this problem is: ∫∫∫[tex](2z/x^2 + z^2)[/tex] dxdydz.

Learn more about order of integration

brainly.com/question/30286960

#SPJ11

Answer:

The volume of the cylinder is 647.07 cm cubed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of a cylinder = base * height

Base = [tex]\pi r^2[/tex]

Height = [tex]6.5 + 6.5 + 6.5 = 19.5 cm[/tex]

We know the diameter of each ball is 6.5 cm, so the diameter of the cylinder is equal to that: 6.5 cm.

The radius is half the diameter, so 6.5 / 2 = 3.25 cm

Now we find the area of the base:

[tex]\pi r^2 = 3.14 (3.25)^2 = 33.18 cm^2[/tex]

Now we calculate the volume of the cylinder

[tex]Base * Height = 33.18 * 19.5 = 647.07 cm^3[/tex]

The volume of the cylinder is therefore, 647.07 cm cubed.

Hope this helps :)

The explanatory variable in this scenario would be the higher quality diet. The student wants to determine if this variable (the diet) has an impact on another variable (the grade point average).

The explanatory variable is the one that is being manipulated or changed in order to observe its effect on the response variable (in this case, the grade point average). Therefore, the student will be changing their diet in order to determine if it has an impact on their grades. It is important to note that in order to properly test the impact of the diet, the student would need to establish a control group (those who do not change their diet) and a treatment group (those who do change their diet to a higher quality one). By comparing the results of these two groups, the student can determine if the higher quality diet has a significant impact on their grades.

In conclusion, the explanatory variable in this scenario is the higher quality diet as it is the variable being manipulated in order to observe its effect on the response variable (the grade point average).

Learn more about  quality here:

https://brainly.com/question/18376767

#SPJ11

In the given right triangle, one leg has a length of 6 cm and the other leg has a length of 8 cm. Since it is a right triangle, you can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of the hypotenuse: a² + b² = c². In this case, a = 6 and b = 8.

6² + 8² = 36 + 64 = 100. Taking the square root of both sides, we get c = 10 cm. So, the hypotenuse of the triangle is 10 cm.

Now, let's denote the length of one side of the square as s. Since the square has a vertex on each of the two legs of the triangle and one side on the hypotenuse, we can form two similar right triangles within the triangle. The ratio of their sides will be the same.

For the smaller right triangle formed, the length of the leg along the 6 cm side is s, and the length of the leg along the 8 cm side is (8 - s). The ratio of the sides in this triangle to the original triangle is s/6 = (8 - s)/8.

Cross-multiplying, we get:

8s = 6(8 - s)
8s = 48 - 6s
14s = 48
s = 48/14

Simplifying the fraction, we get:

s = 24/7 cm

So, the length of one side of the square is 24/7 cm.

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ11

Answer:

-3 < x [tex]\leq[/tex] 4

Step-by-step explanation:

A closed circle means that you are including that number in the solution and an open circle means that you are not including that number in the solution.  In this situation 4 is a solution, but -3 is not.

Helping in the name of Jesus.

The method-of-moments estimator for λ is simply the sample mean, which is, λ_hat = (1/n) * ∑yi, where i = 1 to n, where λ_hat is the estimator of λ, yi are the observed values of the random sample, and n is the sample size.

The Poisson distribution is used to model the probability of a certain number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space when these events occur independently and at a constant rate.

In the method-of-moments, we equate the sample moments to their corresponding population moments and solve for the unknown parameter. For the Poisson distribution, the mean and variance are both equal to λ.

Thus, the method-of-moments estimator for λ is simply the sample mean, which is:

λ_hat = (1/n) * ∑yi, where i = 1 to n

Where λ_hat is the estimator of λ, yi are the observed values of the random sample, and n is the sample size.

To know more about Poisson distribution, here

brainly.com/question/17157139

#SPJ4

(a) In the context of the scatterplot:
(i) Positive: A positive relationship indicates that as the length (x) of the wolves increases, their weight (y) also increases.
(ii) Linear: A linear relationship means that the increase in weight is proportional to the increase in length, and can be represented by a straight line.
(iii) Strong: A strong relationship implies that the data points are closely clustered around the line, showing a consistent pattern between length and weight.

(b) The slope of the least-squares equation (LSRL), 35.02, represents the change in the weight of the wolf (in kg) for each one-meter increase in length. In this case, a wolf that is one meter longer would be expected to weigh approximately 35.02 kg more.

(c) The y-intercept of the LSRL, -16.46, represents the estimated weight (in kg) of a wolf with a length of 0 meters. Although this value is not practically applicable, as wolves cannot have a length of 0 meters, it is used to determine the starting point of the line.

(d) To find the weight of the wolf with a length of 1.4 meters and a residual of -9.67 kg, first calculate the predicted weight using the LSRL: ŷ = -16.46 + 35.02(1.4) = 32.9 kg. Then, add the residual to the predicted weight: 32.9 kg + (-9.67 kg) = 23.23 kg. The weight of the wolf is 23.23 kg.

Learn more about scatterplot here:

https://brainly.com/question/30017616

#SPJ11

The maximum height of the parabola approximating the given trajectory is approximately 5.22 units.

To approximate the trajectory with a parabola in the least squares sense, we need to find the best-fitting quadratic function of the form y = ax² + bx + c. We can use the method of least squares to minimize the sum of the squares of the vertical distances between the data points and the parabola.

1. Set up a system of linear equations using the given data points: (0,0), (1,3), (2,5), and (3,4).
2. Solve the system using linear algebra or other methods to find the coefficients a, b, and c.
3. Determine the maximum height of the parabola using the vertex formula: x = -b/(2a).
4. Plug the value of x back into the equation y = ax² + bx + c to find the maximum height.

Following these steps, we find that the best-fitting parabola is approximately y = -0.5x² + 2.5x + 0.5. The maximum height occurs at x = -b/(2a) ≈ 2.5, and the corresponding height is approximately 5.22 units.

To know more about quadratic function click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/27958964#

#SPJ11

The statement 'if all samples fall within control limits of mean and range then variations in process are not random and exhibit patterns that are problematic' is true.

For the samples fall within the control limits of both the mean and range control charts.

Possible condition for variations process are not random and also exhibit patterns which are problematic.

Such patterns could indicate the presence of non-random causes of variation in the process.

Which may require further investigation and corrective action to improve the quality and consistency of the output.

This implies that, it is important to analyze the control charts for any patterns or trends.

In addition to checking whether the samples fall within the control limits.

learn more about samples here

brainly.com/question/14987349

#SPJ4

The functions 1/x, 1-x², and 1-3x are linearly independent on any interval that does not contain x=0, but they are dependent at x=0.

To determine whether the functions 1/x, 1-x², and 1-3x are linearly independent, we can use the Wronskian method. The Wronskian of a set of functions f1(x), f2(x), ..., fn(x) is defined as:

W(f1, f2, ..., fn) = det | f1 f2 ... fn |

| f1' f2' ... fn' |

where f1', f2', ..., fn' are the derivatives of the functions with respect to x.

If the Wronskian is nonzero for all values of x in a given interval, then the functions are linearly independent on that interval. If the Wronskian is zero for at least one value of x in the interval, then the functions are linearly dependent on that interval.

For the functions 1/x, 1-x², and 1-3x, we have:

W(1/x, 1-x², 1-3x) = det | 1/x 1-x² 1-3x |

| -1/x² -2x -3 |

| 0 -2x 0 |

Expanding the determinant, we get:

W(1/x, 1-x², 1-3x) = -6/[tex]x^3[/tex]

Since the Wronskian is nonzero for all values of x except x = 0, the functions 1/x, 1-x², and 1-3x are linearly independent on any interval that does not contain x = 0.

Therefore, the functions are linearly independent except at x = 0.

Learn more about Wronskian method

brainly.com/question/14309076

#SPJ11

Answer:

3 days.

Step-by-step explanation:

Simple ratio:

8/2=12/x

4/1=12/x

4x=12

x=3

Hope this helps!

Applying the intersecting secants theorem, the length of KL is calculated as: 15 units.

Based on the intersecting secants theorem, the equation below can be formed to solve for x:

MS * NM = MK * ML

Plug in the values:

18 * 7 = (6 + x + 15) * 6

126 = (x + 21) * 6

126 = 6x + 126

126 - 126 = 6x

0 = 6x

x = 0

KL = x + 15 = 0 + 15

KL = 15

Learn more about the intersecting secants theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/31592339

#SPJ1

The circumference of the monocle circle would be; 18.84 square centimeters

WE know that circumference of the circle that has a radius of r is defined as the product of diameter to the pie value.

The circumference of the circle = 2πr

We are given that For Halloween, Elizabeth wears a monocle that has a radius of 3 centimeters.

R = 3 centimeters

P.S: Diameter is radius + radius so that means that diameter is 3 + 3.

The circumference of the circle = 2πr

The circumference of the circle = 2 (3.14 ) 3

The circumference of the circle = 18.84

Learn more about circumference here;

brainly.com/question/12512221

#SPJ1

Yes, that is correct. The derivative of a vector function is obtained by differentiating each component function with respect to the independent variable, and forming a new vector with the resulting derivatives as its components.

The derivative of a vector function can be thought of as the rate of change of the vector function with respect to the independent variable. In other words, how much does the vector change as the independent variable changes.

A vector function is typically defined as a function that maps a scalar input (the independent variable) to a vector output. For example, let's consider a vector function f(t) = (f1(t), f2(t), f3(t)), where f1(t), f2(t), and f3(t) are scalar functions of t.

To find the derivative of the vector function f(t), we differentiate each component function with respect to t using the rules of calculus. This means taking the derivative of f1(t) with respect to t, which gives us f1'(t), taking the derivative of f2(t) with respect to t, which gives us f2'(t), and taking the derivative of f3(t) with respect to t, which gives us f3'(t).

To know more about derivative,

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The weight of the original statue under the condition it was 20 feet tall then it measure up to 384 pounds.

The given measure length original statue is 7 feet tall and let us consider the x pounds for its weight.

The measurement of small statue is 10 inches and the weight is 16 pounds.

Using the context concerning x to find its value

7 feet = 84 inches

16 pounds / 10 inches = x / 84 inches

Solving for x:

x = (16 pounds / 10 inches) x 84 inches

x = 134.4 pounds

Given condition if the original statue measures up to 20 feet tall, then the weight is

(134.4 pounds / 7 feet) x 20 feet

= 384 pounds

The weight of the original statue under the condition it was 20 feet tall then it measure up to 384 pounds.

To learn more about weight,

https://brainly.com/question/28571689

#SPJ4

The language of palindromes over {0, 1} containing equal numbers of 0's and 1's is not context-free, as demonstrated through the pumping lemma for context-free languages.

To show that the language of palindromes over {0, 1} containing equal numbers of 0's and 1's is not context-free, we will use the pumping lemma for context-free languages.

Assume that the language is context-free, and let p be the pumping length guaranteed by the pumping lemma. Consider the palindrome w = 0^p 1^p 0^p 1^p. This string is in the language, as it contains an equal number of 0's and 1's, and is a palindrome.

By the pumping lemma, we can write w as w = uvxyz, where |vxy| ≤ p, |vy| ≥ 1, and for all i ≥ 0, uv^ixy^iz is also in the language.

Since |vxy| ≤ p, the substring vxy must occur entirely within one block of 0's or 1's. Thus, v and y must consist entirely of either 0's or 1's.

Consider the case where v and y consist entirely of 0's. Let u = 0^a and z = 0^b1^p0^p1^p, where a + b = p - |vy|. Then, we have

uv^2xy^2z = 0^a(0^{|v|+|y|})0^b1^p0^p1^p,

which is not a palindrome, since the middle block of 1's separates two different blocks of 0's.

Similarly, if v and y consist entirely of 1's, we can choose u and z such that uv^2xy^2z is not a palindrome.

Learn more about palindrome here

brainly.com/question/19052372

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

We can simplify each fraction with a common denominator of 6:

= (3/6) + (2/6) + (5/6)

= 10/6

Now, we can simplify the fraction:

= (1+4/6)

= (1+2/3)

= 5/3

Therefore, the expression is equal to 5/3.

A t-test is used instead of a z-test when the population standard deviation is unknown .

When population standard deviation value is not given then instead of z-test we use t-test.

It must be estimated from the sample, and the sample size is small typically less than 30.

A z-test is used when the population standard deviation is known or when the sample size is large.

If the population standard deviation is known and the sample size is large typically greater than 30, a z-test can be used.

However, in many cases, the population standard deviation is unknown, and a t-test is more appropriate.

Therefore, a t-test is used instead of a z-test in situations where the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is small.

learn more about t-test here

brainly.com/question/31235782

#SPJ4

The probabilities for AUB, A© , and B of two events A and B are 0.65,0.35, 0.55

a) To find the probability of the union of two events A and B, we use the formula P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A∩B). We are given P(A) and P(A∩B), but we need to find P(B) first. We know that P(BC) = 0.45, which means that P(B) = 1 - P(BC) = 1 - 0.45 = 0.55. Now we can plug in the values to get P(AUB) = 0.35 + 0.55 - 0.25 = 0.65.

b) To find the probability of the intersection of two events A and B, we use the symbol © (which means "and" or "intersection"). We are asked to find P(A©), which is the same as P(A). We are given that P(A∩B) = 0.25, but we can't use that to find P(A) directly. Instead, we use the fact that P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A∩B) = 0.65. We already found P(AUB) in part (a), so we can rearrange the formula to solve for P(A): P(A) = P(AUB) - P(B) + P(A∩B) = 0.65 - 0.55 + 0.25 = 0.35. Therefore, P(A©) = P(A) = 0.35.

c) We already found P(B) in part (a): P(B) = 0.55.

Learn more about probability: https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The 95% confidence interval will be narrower (have a smaller range) than the 99% confidence interval.(C)

When comparing a 95% confidence interval and a 99% confidence interval using the same sample data, the difference lies in the confidence level. A higher confidence level (99%) requires a wider interval to capture the true population parameter more often.

Conversely, a lower confidence level (95%) requires a narrower interval. This is because increasing the confidence level means increasing the certainty of capturing the true population parameter, which requires a larger range to account for the greater likelihood of inclusion.(C)

To know more about confidence interval click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/24131141#

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis is that the average amount of sleep on weeknights for LMC students is not significantly different from the national average of 6.9 hours.

Based on the given scenario, the student at Los Medinas College wants to determine if the average amount of sleep on weeknights is different for LMC students compared to the national average. The hypotheses can be formulated as follows:

Null hypothesis (H0): The average amount of sleep for LMC students is equal to the national average, which is 6.9 hours per night on weeknights. Mathematically, H0: μ = 6.9

Alternative hypothesis (H1): The average amount of sleep for LMC students is different from the national average. Mathematically, H1: μ ≠ 6.9

Here, μ represents the average amount of sleep for LMC students on weeknights. The student will test these hypotheses at a 5% level of significance using the collected data. The alternative hypothesis is that the average amount of sleep on weeknights for LMC students is significantly different from the national average.

Learn more about the Null Hypothesis:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The inverse of A is A^-1 = P^-1 * D^-1 * P, which shows that A^-1 is also diagonalizable. Therefore option B is correct.

To show that if A is both diagonalizable and invertible, then so is A^-1:

We first need to understand the given terms:

If A is diagonalizable, it means A can be expressed in the form A = PDP^-1, where P is an invertible matrix and D is a diagonal matrix (option a).

If A is invertible, it means zero is not an eigenvalue of A, so the diagonal entries in D are not zero, and D is invertible (option d).

Now, we know A = PDP^-1, and we want to find the inverse of A, which is A^-1.

To do this, we can multiply both sides of the equation by A^-1:

A^-1 * A = A^-1 * (PDP^-1)
I = A^-1 * P * D * P^-1, where I is the identity matrix.

Now, multiply both sides by P:

P^-1 * I * P = (A^-1 * P * D * P^-1) * P
P^-1 = A^-1 * P * D

Next, multiply both sides by D^-1:

D * P^-1 = A^-1 * P * D * D^-1
D * P^-1 = A^-1 * P

Finally, multiply both sides by P^-1:

D * P^-1 * P = A^-1 * P * P^-1
D = A^-1

So, A^-1 = P^-1 * D^-1 * P (option B), which shows that A^-1 is also diagonalizable.

To know more about Diagonalizable:

https://brainly.com/question/28119462

#SPJ11