Who are we without society

Answer:

Dear Mr. Chang,

I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to explain why implementing a groundwater heating system would be more effective in warming the school compared to the traditional water heater system. I have gathered some evidence to support this claim:

Efficiency: Groundwater heating systems are known for their high efficiency in extracting heat from the ground. According to research conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy, these systems can achieve efficiency levels of 300-500% compared to the 90-98% efficiency of traditional water heaters. This means that for every unit of energy consumed, the groundwater heating system can provide three to five units of heat, resulting in a more effective heating process for the school.

Consistent Temperature: Groundwater temperatures remain relatively stable throughout the year, typically ranging from 50°F to 60°F (10°C to 15.5°C). By utilizing this consistent and relatively higher temperature, the groundwater heating system can provide a more stable and reliable heat source for the school compared to a water heater system that relies on external energy sources. This ensures a more consistent and comfortable indoor climate throughout the year.

Cost Savings: Implementing a groundwater heating system can lead to significant cost savings in the long run. The higher efficiency and lower operating costs of these systems can result in reduced energy consumption and lower utility bills for the school. Additionally, as groundwater heating systems have longer lifespans and require less maintenance compared to traditional water heaters, the overall maintenance and replacement costs are also reduced.

Based on this evidence, it is clear that a groundwater heating system would be more effective in warming the school compared to a water heater system. The higher efficiency, consistent temperature, and cost savings associated with groundwater heating systems make them a reliable and sustainable solution for providing efficient heating throughout the school.

I would be more than happy to discuss this further or provide any additional information you may require. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,

[Your Name]

Explanation:

Dear Mr. Chang,

I am writing to explain why the groundwater heating system will warm the school more effectively than the water heater system. Firstly, the groundwater system uses heat from the earth's core to warm the building, whereas the water heater system uses electricity or gas to heat water. This means that the groundwater system is a more sustainable and cost-effective option, as it does not rely on non-renewable resources to function.

Additionally, the groundwater heating system circulates warm water through the building's floors and walls, which helps to maintain a consistently warm temperature throughout the day. On the other hand, the water heater system only heats water that is used for activities such as showers or washing dishes.

Furthermore, the groundwater system is able to provide more consistent and stable heat than the water heater system. This is because the temperature of groundwater remains fairly steady year-round, whereas the temperature of the water in the water heater may be affected by external factors such as the weather.

In conclusion, the groundwater heating system is a superior option as it provides sustainable and cost-effective heating, maintains a consistent temperature throughout the day, and is more stable than the water heating system. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

1. Guards: The guards experienced cognitive dissonance because they were asked to behave in a way that was inconsistent with their personal values.

Prisoners: The prisoners experienced cognitive dissonance because they were stripped of their personal identity and forced to live in a dehumanizing environment.

How to explain the information

2. Guards: The guards coped with their dissonance by rationalizing their behavior.

Prisoners: The prisoners coped with their dissonance by developing coping mechanisms such as humor and self-deception.

3.  Zimbardo used a number of techniques to help the prisoners and guards get “comfortable” in their roles. He dressed the guards in uniforms and gave them badges of authority.

4. The Fundamental Attribution Error is the tendency to attribute the behavior of others to their internal characteristics, while attributing our own behavior to external factors.

5. Asch’s research on conformity suggests that people are more likely to conform to the expectations of a group, even if those expectations are wrong. This can be seen in the Stanford Prison Experiment, where the guards conformed to the expectations of the authoritarian prison environment.

6. The Stanford Prison Experiment violated a number of current psychological ethical principles. First, it did not obtain informed consent from the participants.

7. Diffusion of responsibility is the tendency for people to feel less responsible for their actions when they are part of a group.

8. Milgram’s research on obedience suggests that people are more likely to obey authority figures, even if those authority figures are asking them to do something that they believe is wrong.

9. The research about in-group and out-group relationships can be applied to the Stanford Prison Study in a number of ways. First, the guards and prisoners quickly formed in-groups and out-groups. The guards saw themselves as the "good guys" and the prisoners as the "bad guys." This created a sense of us vs. them, which made it easier for the guards to mistreat the prisoners. Second, the guards and prisoners used stereotypes to make sense of each other.

10 Schemas contributed to the abuses that took place in the Stanford Prison Study and Abu Ghraib in a number of ways. First, schemas can lead to prejudice and discrimination. The guards and soldiers in these studies had schemas about prisoners and enemy combatants that led them to view these groups as less than human.

Learn more about dissonance on

https://brainly.com/question/29807266

#SPJ1

1. Guards experienced cognitive dissonance when they had to choose between their personal beliefs and the role they were assigned to play. They had to reconcile their internal beliefs with their actions. Prisoners experienced cognitive dissonance when they were forced to accept their new identity as prisoners and had to reconcile their behavior with their self-image.

2. Guards coped with their dissonance by developing harsher attitudes towards prisoners and justifying their behavior. Prisoners coped by becoming passive and accepting their situation.

3. Zimbardo used deindividuation to help prisoners and guards get comfortable in their roles by removing their individuality and giving them uniforms and numbers.

4. The Fundamental Attribution Error can be applied to this study because people tend to overemphasize dispositional factors in explaining behavior, rather than situational factors. People may have attributed the behavior of the guards and prisoners to their personality traits, rather than the situation they were in.

5. Asch's conformity experiments could be used to explain why the guards joined "John Wayne" in the mistreatment of the prisoners. The guards conformed to the group norms and followed the lead of the more aggressive guards. The prisoners went along with the prisoners who rebelled and later obeyed because they wanted to fit in and avoid punishment.

6. This experiment violates the ethical principles of informed consent, deception, and protection from harm.

7. Diffusion of Responsibility was exhibited by the guards in their explanations for what they did to prisoners when they claimed that they were just following orders and not responsible for their actions.

8. Milgram's findings on obedience are applicable to the Stanford Prison Study and Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal because they both show how people can be influenced to do things they wouldn't normally do by authority figures.

9. In-group and out-group relationships can be applied to the Stanford Prison Study because the guards and prisoners formed distinct groups with different norms and values. The guards saw the prisoners as the out-group and treated them accordingly.

10. Schemas contributed to abuses that took place in the Stanford Prison Study and Abu Ghraib because the guards and soldiers had preconceived ideas about the roles they were supposed to play and the behavior that was expected of them. They acted according to these schemas, even if it meant mistreating others.