How is the poem "On the Bus with Rosa Parks" different from the memoir My Story? Select five choices.
The poem describes a single scene; the memoir describes many scenes.
The poem uses few words; the memoir uses many words.
The poem has short lines and stanzas; the memoir is written in prose paragraphs.
The poem places the bus ride in historical perspective; the memoir does not.
The poem explains why Rosa Parks stayed seated; the memoir does not.
The poem shows an outsider’s point of view of Rosa Parks; the memoir does not.
The poem compares Rosa Parks’s gaze to a flame; the memoir does not.
Answers
Answer:
The answers are
A. The poem describes a single scene; the memoir describes many scenes.
B. The poem uses few words; the memoir uses many words.
C. The poem has short lines and stanzas; the memoir is written in prose paragraphs.
F. The poem shows an outsider’s point of view of Rosa Parks; the memoir does not.
G. The poem compares Rosa Parks’s gaze to a flame; the memoir does not.
Answer:
Sorry if this too late but its A,B,C,F,G
Explanation:
I just took the test
hope this helps
Related Questions
A. How do the men react to
Okonkwo's harsh words towards
Osugo? [RL 10.6)
Answers
Answer:
In the story, Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe,
In Chapter 4, in the scenario wherein Okonkwo belittled a man who contradicted what he says, he threw hard and harsh words at the man named Osugo. This Okonkwo's attitude was seen and witnessed by the men in the clan present in the Kindred meeting and it does not please them, yet they are shocked and did not allow Okonkwo to act like that, as they took side with Osugo.
Explanation:
Why?
In Chapter Four (4) of the story Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe, Okonkwo, the main character in the story has encountered a man named Osugo. It is during a kindred meeting wherein Okonkwo belittled those members of the clan who were less successful. Osugo, one of those less fortunate men, can't stand the rudeness and harshness of Okonkwo and speak against him. Though Osugo acknowledges the successful life of Okonkwo which he achieved through hard work and patience, in his perspective, it is not enough to embarrass and degrade people who are not his level.
Therefore, Okonkwo with his pride, spoken saying "This meeting is for men" which implies that he humiliates Osugo as not a man and not should be in the clan. This attitude of Okonkwo struck and upset people, especially the men who heard the humiliation. The men reacted taking the side of the other man Osugo. In short, they stand against Okonkwo's attitude, and the oldest man take part reminding Okonkwo to not forget to be humble despite of his success.
The men react to Okonkwo's harsh words by taking Osugo's side and reproaching Okonkwo's harsh words and lack of humility.
What did Okonkwo do?In Chapter 4 of "Things Fall Apart," during a meeting, Okonkwo offends a man who is less succesful than himself and who has no titles, Osugo. He tells him that "This meeting is for men," implying that the other is a woman and, therefore, shouldn't have a say in the meeting.
The other men present immediately take Osugo's side. As a matter of fact, the oldest man in the meeting tells Okonkwo that he should stay humble. Okonkwo then apologizes.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the men react by taking Osugo's side and reproaching Okonkwo.
Learn more about Okonkwo here:
https://brainly.com/question/5017121
Which word is NOT a synonym for savory?
a.
appetizing
c.
pleasing
b.
delectable
d.
repulsive
Answers
Answer:
Repulsive
Explanation:
Repulsive means disgust
Savory means acceptable.
Repulsive is not a synonym for savory. Thus, option D is correct. A term that has the same meaning as another word is said to be a synonym.
Even if they occasionally have different meanings from the original term, these terms might nevertheless be closely linked to it. The terms "syn" and "onym," which in Greek mean "together" and "name," respectively, are the origin of the phrase. Avoid using the same terms again whether speaking or writing; this will help you expand your vocabulary.
Additionally, you might look up synonyms using a thesaurus. One of the finest methods to increase your vocabulary while writing or speaking is to look for synonyms (words with related meanings) in a thesaurus. This will help you avoid using the same words again and over. Two purposes are served by synonyms. First, using synonyms can help you choose words that are more accurately matched to their meanings.
Learn more about synonyms here:
https://brainly.com/question/28598800
#SPJ6
50 points!!!!!!!!!!
Ethical Communication Discussion
What is the objective ethical ideal, and how does it apply to interpersonal communication?
Why is the objective ethical ideal preferable to the subjective ethical ideal in interpersonal relationships (i.e., spouses, siblings, friends, parent and child, employer and employee, teacher and student)?
How do you think this style of communication might impact those relationships?
(150 words in total!!)
Answers
Answer:
Here is a great summary to answer your questions.
Explanation:
What is the objective ethical ideal, and how does it apply to interpersonal communication?
Imagine a situation in which a friend asks you if you like her new haircut. Instead of telling her the cut is unflattering, you respond, “Wow, it’s so short!” No one ever said that telling the truth all the time was easy, but is it ethical to omit part of the truth to spare someone’s feelings? While this question must be answered individually, if the answer is yes, a subjective ethical ideal is upheld where the answer is not always right or wrong but perhaps somewhere in between and influenced by a person’s beliefs and morals. If the answer is no, an objective ethical ideal is upheld where the answer is always right or wrong and never influenced by personal considerations. Inevitably, ethical dilemmas will arise at work, home, and school. However, understanding the difference between ethical and unethical communication will allow you to make informed decisions about how to manage each situation.
Subjective ethical ideal:
This is the ideal that objective is too rigid or too confining and that all elements of the context need to be considered, such as personal values, beliefs, ideals, norms, expectations, feelings, and so forth.
Objective ethical ideal:
This is the ideal that the right or wrong of a situation is absolute and should not be influenced by personal morals, values, beliefs, and so forth. Because both people and contexts are always changing, it is often difficult to uphold an objective ethical ideal.
Why is the objective ethical ideal preferable to the subjective ethical ideal in interpersonal relationships (i.e., spouses, siblings, friends, parent and child, employer and employee, teacher and student)?
The objective ethical ideal is the ideal that the right or wrong of a situation is absolute and should not be influenced by personal morals, values, beliefs, and so forth. Because both people and contexts are always changing, it is often difficult to uphold an objective ethical ideal.
The subjective ethical ideal is the ideal that objective is too rigid or too confining and that all elements of the context need to be considered, such as personal values, beliefs, ideals, norms, expectations, feelings, and so forth.
The objective ethical ideal is preferable over the subjective ethical ideal because with the subjective ethical ideal, you must consider all elements of the context, and that is not helpful, because lots of people have differing views in all of those areas. Also, because the subjective ethical ideal is the idea that you can stretch the objective to fit that specific scenario.
How do you think this style of communication might impact those relationships?
Communication can be the end result of action and behavior, and communication can influence a person’s actions and behaviors. The most effective communicators understand that the process of communication creates a fluid exchange of ideas, enabling interpersonal communication to be used productively at work, at home, and in the ever-changing, interactive world.
Keywords and phrases:
Communication, ethical communication, subjective ethical ideal, objective ethical ideal, interpersonal communication.
Hope this helps! Brainliest would be much appreciated! Have a great day! :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Here is a great summary to answer your questions.
Explanation:
What is the objective ethical ideal, and how does it apply to interpersonal communication?
Imagine a situation in which a friend asks you if you like her new haircut. Instead of telling her the cut is unflattering, you respond, “Wow, it’s so short!” No one ever said that telling the truth all the time was easy, but is it ethical to omit part of the truth to spare someone’s feelings? While this question must be answered individually, if the answer is yes, a subjective ethical ideal is upheld where the answer is not always right or wrong but perhaps somewhere in between and influenced by a person’s beliefs and morals. If the answer is no, an objective ethical ideal is upheld where the answer is always right or wrong and never influenced by personal considerations. Inevitably, ethical dilemmas will arise at work, home, and school. However, understanding the difference between ethical and unethical communication will allow you to make informed decisions about how to manage each situation.
Subjective ethical ideal:
This is the ideal that objective is too rigid or too confining and that all elements of the context need to be considered, such as personal values, beliefs, ideals, norms, expectations, feelings, and so forth.
Objective ethical ideal:
This is the ideal that the right or wrong of a situation is absolute and should not be influenced by personal morals, values, beliefs, and so forth. Because both people and contexts are always changing, it is often difficult to uphold an objective ethical ideal.
Why is the objective ethical ideal preferable to the subjective ethical ideal in interpersonal relationships (i.e., spouses, siblings, friends, parent and child, employer and employee, teacher and student)?
The objective ethical ideal is the ideal that the right or wrong of a situation is absolute and should not be influenced by personal morals, values, beliefs, and so forth. Because both people and contexts are always changing, it is often difficult to uphold an objective ethical ideal.
The subjective ethical ideal is the ideal that objective is too rigid or too confining and that all elements of the context need to be considered, such as personal values, beliefs, ideals, norms, expectations, feelings, and so forth.
The objective ethical ideal is preferable over the subjective ethical ideal because with the subjective ethical ideal, you must consider all elements of the context, and that is not helpful, because lots of people have differing views in all of those areas. Also, because the subjective ethical ideal is the idea that you can stretch the objective to fit that specific scenario.
How do you think this style of communication might impact those relationships?
Communication can be the end result of action and behavior, and communication can influence a person’s actions and behaviors. The most effective communicators understand that the process of communication creates a fluid exchange of ideas, enabling interpersonal communication to be used productively at work, at home, and in the ever-changing, interactive world.
Keywords and phrases:
Communication, ethical communication, subjective ethical ideal, objective ethical ideal, interpersonal communication.
Hope this helps! Brainliest would be much appreciated! Have a great day! :)
Someone hurry and answer this ill give BRAINLIEST and there 50 POINTS
Answers
Answer:
last is first, third is second, second is third, and first is last.
Explanation:
hopes is helps
Answer:
It took me quite some time to answer this one.
The events happened in this order;
First, Shere Khan tricks Akela into a bad kill, then boldly speaks against Mowgli at the council, but when Mowgli holds up the sacred Red Flower, The tables are turned! Shere Khan cowers away from the flower, then runs away.
Explanation:
I have watched the original and live movie and have read The Jungle book myself!
What is a word for “a state where their freedom has been taken away”?
Answers
Answer:
captivity
Explanation:
captivity is a word for “a state where their freedom has been taken away
FORMAL a situation in which someone controls you and you have to obey them
bondage NOUN
FORMAL a situation in which you are not free because someone or something controls your life
prisoner NOUN
someone who has no freedom because their life is controlled by something or someone
Please help
George came back in with the beer, paused while a handicap signal shook him up. And then he sat down again. "You been crying" he said to Hazel. "Yup," she said. "What about?" he said. "I forget," she said. "Something real sad on television." "What was it?" he said. "It's all kind of mixed up in my mind," said Hazel. "Forget sad things," said George. "I always do," said Hazel. "That's my girl," said George. He winced. There was the sound of a riveting gun in his head. "Gee - I could tell that one was a doozy," said Hazel. "You can say that again," said George. "Gee-" said Hazel, "I could tell that one was a doozy."
What is the author's reason for ending the story with the dialogue between George and Hazel?
Question 3 options:
This ending puts reader's minds at ease because things go back to normal for the Bergerons.
Vonnegut intended to reinforce the importance of total equality by highlighting how well Hazel and George handled the death of their son.
The ending shows how this society has stripped its citizens of their humanity. They completely forget what happened and go about their loves.
Vonnegut intended to show readers that violence is effective in controlling the citizens.
Answers
The final dialogue between George and Hazel in "Harrison Bergeron" reveals the following reason:
C. The ending shows how this society has stripped its citizens of their humanity. They completely forget what happened and go about their lives.
What happens in "Harrison Bergeron"?While George was in the kitchen, his wife Hazel watched as their son, Harrison, was killed in live TV. However, she quickly forgets what she has seen, although she knows it was something sad.
The society in which they live has stripped them from their humanity. People are forced to wear handicaps in order to be average. And those, like Hazel, who are truly average, cannot understand a thing.
This is how the government controls people. Violence is not necessarily effective. So much so that Harrison still chose to defy the government, even though he knew they could kill him.
Control is more effective when people forget who they are, forget they are human. It is easier to control those who do not understand or remember a thing.
Learn more about "Harrison Bergeron" here:
https://brainly.com/question/11433020
can someone proof-read my expository essay explaining why hard work is necessary to be successful? i need a second opinion.
Answers
Answer:
You should highlight your continuing words ex:(also, next, last) and things in quotation marks.
Explanation:
which of the following words could be used to describe the style of a text?
A: States of being like tired or hungry
B: Writing types like conversational,informative,and descriptive.
C:Topics like society, courage, and bravery
D:Attitudes like cheerful, frightened, or nervous
Answers
What is one difference in the Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson poems you
read?
Answers
and Emily Dickinson is that Whitman uses
personification, whereas Dickinson avoids
figurative language. Whitman incorporates
transcendentalism and realism in his works. On the other hand, Dickinson's poems talks about death and immortality.
Hope that helps! Have a good day :)
Think about the forms of government discussed in the Article. How are they alike and different? Use
facts and details from the Article in your answer, including examples, when possible.
Answers
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_----------------------------_______________________thuck you
(b) What event provides him with a solution
Answers
what are the noouns in dis sentence
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
Mouse Finnie and Mars
Explanation:
Nouns are people, places, or things
Which of these careers would use a specimen to do its work?
an astronomer
an engineer
a computer scientist
a marine biologist
Answers
Explanation: It's the only one that actually works with animals in the question. (Btw I also did a quiz with a similar question and it had this as it's answer)
Answer:
Marine Biologest
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
If you have 1 cat that is black and 1 cat that is golden with brown spots. Wicth one has bad luck?
Answers
Answer:
The Black cat.
Explanation:
According to popular belief, a black cat crossing your path will bring you bad luck.
Please help me .....
Answers
3. a
4. h
5. b
6. g
7. d
8. f
What does claudius ask rosencrantz and guildenstern to do?.
Answers
Please add a screenshot of the question or tell me the title of the book.
which quote from the text best supports the answer too Part A? "The Gospel of Doubt"
Answers
Dictionary entries for the words "allowed" and "aloud" showing the number of syllables, their pronunciation, etymology, parts of speech and definition. Elementary school students are not ____________ to talk while the teacher reads __________ after lunch. Which words complete the sentence correctly? allowed, allowed aloud, aloud aloud, allowed allowed, aloud.
Answers
The correct words in the above sentences in order to complete the sentence include: allowed and aloud. Elementary school students are not allowed to talk while the teacher reads aloud after lunch.
What is Dictionary?Dictionary contains the words or group of words of a different languages along with their meanings, concepts and brief explanations. Dictionaries ae usually written in alphabetical order.
The teachers of particular class at elementary school are able to read aloud after having their lunch but, the students are not allowed to talk with each other because of Homophone.
Learn more about Dictionary, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1199071?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Its D
Explanation:
I took the test
Help I need an answer for this in 5 minutes. How is Pi a dynamic character?
Answers
Answer:
Pi Patel is a round character because he changes throughout the story. Richard Parker, the tiger aboard the life boat and a symbol of Pi's animalistic changes, is a dynamic character. Pi and Richard Parker were both motivated to stay alive at sea after the ship they were on sank.
Explanation:
Answer:
A dynamic character is one who changes.
Explanation:
Pi changes throughout the story after he must kill a fish in order to survive. He believed in the importance of life for all living things, and struggled to kill a fish, but realized that he had no other choice if he wanted to survive while on the lifeboat. This went against his morals and beliefs, making him change out of necessity.
Describe why you agree or disagree with requiring students to attend college upon graduation
Answers
Answer:
I think it is good because you have to move out of your home some day and you need to have money. But to do that you must have degree yes you have a job at McDonalds or Wendy's, but you need a real job to have enough money for your rent and bills. You may not want to or like it but its the best way to go.
Explanation:
Answer:
Students can attend college and contribute to society by doing something like become a doctor or being a mechanic.
Explanation:
I hope this helps! :D
For the last three years during Odysseus's absence, Penelope is able to trick the suitors and forestall their efforts to marry her by _
Answers
Answer:
hello there
Explanation:
Penelope delayed marrying one of the suitors by telling them that she would not marry until she. Penelope was able to trick her suitors for three years.
How do you know that Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy?
O There is a wedding.
Disaster is foreshadowed.
O Some of the characters are motivated by love.
O Some of the characters are motivated by greed.
Answers
Who wrote the bestselling memoir i know why the caged bird sings.
Answers
Answer:
Maya Angelou
Explanation:
After his battle with Grendel, what does Beowulf
do with Grendel's arm?
Answers
Answer:
Beowulf summons even greater strength and rips Grendel's arm completely out of its socket. Fatally wounded, Grendel slinks back to his swampy home to die. Back in the mead-hall, Beowulf holds up his gory trophy in triumph. He proudly hangs the arm high on the wall of Heorot as proof of his victory.
How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? by rephrasing it as a conclusion by adding a statistic or a quotation by deleting it and adding another claim by pointing out a flaw in the counterclaim.
Answers
A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger?Correct answer is option A.
By rephrasing it as a conclusion.This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/3959097
Answer:
The first answer is wrong
the answer is B: by adding a statistic or a quotation
What do you think writing effectively requires of a writer?.
Answers
Answer:
Writing effectively requires a writer to think cautiously about the purpose for the writing, an strategy of what and how to say it, and being able to comprehend what the author has to say.
Explanation:
What do you know about the role of the court in your own words
Answers
Answer:
Courts decide what really happened and what should be done about it. ... They also decide whether or not a person committed a crime and what the punishment should be.
Explanation:
Alex was flying a kite when it got stuck in the branches of a tall tree. He tried to get the kite out of the tree by yanking on the rope of the kite while standing under the tree. The kite did not fall out of the tree. Which statement correctly describes two forces that were acting on the kite?
Answers
Answer:
Alex was flying a kite when it got stuck in the branches of a tall tree
Explanation:
Force 1: it says that the kite was flying. the kite needs wind in order for it to fly, therefore the wind is pushing force on to the kite for it to fly.
Force 2: It say that the kite got stuck. Think about what you would feel if you were running and you got stuck in something. You would feel at least a little bit of force somewhere on your body.
Just like that, the kite felt some force from the leaves of the tree when it got stuck.
HOPE THIS HELPS. GOOD LUCK!
Choose the sentence parts that are required when naming the core parts of the sentence.
preposition
subject
predicate
complement
phrase
Answers
Subject and Predicate are the parts of a sentence that are required when naming the core parts of the sentence. The correct options are B and C.
Why is predicate important?Whether a sentence is simple, compound, or complete, predicates are a necessary component. Through actions or a state of being, predicates enable writers to give their subjects life, and the objects and modifiers contained within these predicates support the main verb by providing even more information about the subject.
The subject and predicate are a sentence's essential components; other elements like the preposition or the phrase are optional. The secret to creating effective sentences is to comprehend the Subject and Predicate. A complete sentence's subject and predicate both describe the person or thing that the sentence is about.
Thus, the ideal selection is options B and C.
Learn more about predicate here:
https://brainly.com/question/985028
#SPJ1
Auden interprets the scene as a human response to suffering. Do you agree or disagree with the poet's interpretation of the painting? Why?
Answers
The question requires a personal answer. For this reason, it is not correct for me to provide an answer for you, but I will show you how to find that answer.
For Auden, what is the human response to suffering?The indifference.The insensitivity.The carelessness.The superficiality.Auden has this interpretation of the painting as he realizes that during Icarus' downfall, people in the region went about their lives completely indifferent to Icarus' suffering from drowning.
So, to answer this question, you must think about the painting and Auden's opinion, and based on your perception of the painting, decide whether or not you agree with Auden.
Do you think people are indifferent to suffering? If your answer is yes or no, you should explain why and make a comparison between your opinion and Auden's opinion.
More information about The Fall of Icarus at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12271716
