If she then brakes to a stop in 0.55 s, what is her acceleration in meters per square second?

a) Number of exposures = (1 - r) / (r * p)

b) Total number of claims = (1 - r) / r

c) Total sum of claim amounts = λ * Total number of claims

r: credibility factor (fraction of observed claims used in credibility calculations)

p: probability of a policyholder having a claim (P[Ni = 1])

q: probability of a policyholder not having a claim (P[Ni = 0])

λ: parameter of the Poisson distribution for individual claims (Yi,k)

To learn more about probability click here: https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The integral [tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx[/tex] when evaluated is 72π

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx[/tex]

Expand

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = \int\limits^6_{-6} {[x\sqrt{36 - x^2} + 4\sqrt{36 - x^2}}] \, dx[/tex]

So, we have

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = \int\limits^6_{-6} {[x\sqrt{36 - x^2} dx+ 4\int\limits^6_{-6}\sqrt{36 - x^2}}] \, dx[/tex]

Let u = 36 - x² and du = -2x

So, we have:

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 4\int\limits^6_{-6}\sqrt{36 - x^2}}] \, dx[/tex]

Next, we have

x = 6sin(u), where [tex]u = \sin^{-1}(\frac x6})[/tex]

This gives

dx = 6cos(u)du

So, we have

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 4\int\limits^6_{-6} 6\cos(u) \sqrt{36 - 36\sin^2(u)}}] \, du[/tex]

Factor out √36

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 4\int\limits^6_{-6} 6\cos(u) * 6\sqrt{1 - \sin^2(u)}}] \, du[/tex]

Rewrite as

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 4\int\limits^6_{-6} 6\cos(u) * 6\sqrt{\cos^2(u)}}] \, du[/tex]

So, we have

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 4\int\limits^6_{-6} 6\cos(u) * 6\cos(u)}] \, du[/tex]

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 4\int\limits^6_{-6} 36\cos^2(u)}] \, du[/tex]

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = [-\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac 32}{3}]|\limits^6_{-6} + 144\int\limits^6_{-6} \cos^2(u)} \, du[/tex]

When integrated, we have

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = -\frac{(36 - x^2)^\frac23}{3} + 2x\sqrt{36 - x^2} + 72\sin^{-1}(\frac{x}{6})[/tex]

Substitute in the boundaries and evaluate

So, we have

[tex]\int\limits^6_{-6} {(x + 4)\sqrt{36 - x^2}} \, dx = 72\pi[/tex]

Hence, the solution is 72π

Read more about integral at

https://brainly.com/question/32418363

#SPJ4

The matrix represents each system. x + 2y = 11 2x + 3y = 18 is;

[1  2 | 11]

[2  3 | 18]

We are given that;

The functions

x + 2y = 11

2x + 3y = 18

Now,

We can write a matrix to represent this system of equations by using the coefficients of x and y as the entries in the matrix.

The augmented matrix will include the constants on the right-hand side of each equation.

So for the system:

x + 2y = 11

2x + 3y = 18

Therefore, by matrix the answer will be

[1  2 | 11]

[2  3 | 18]

To learn more about matrix visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ4

The complete question is;

Write a matrix to represent each system.

x + 2y = 11

2x + 3y = 18

The expression with the rationalized denominator is √(15x²y⁵) / (5xy³).

To rationalize the denominator of the expression √3xy² / √5xy³, we multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, which is √5xy³.

√3xy² / √5xy³  * (√5xy³ / √5xy³)

This simplifies to: (√3xy² * √5xy³) / (√5xy³ * √5xy³)

To multiply the square roots in the numerator and denominator, we combine them into a single square root: √(3xy² * 5xy³) / √(5xy³ * 5xy³)

Simplifying further: √(15x²y⁵) / √(25x²y⁶)

Since the denominator contains a perfect square, we can simplify it to its square root: √(15x²y⁵) / (5xy³)

Thus, the expression with the rationalized denominator is √(15x²y⁵) / (5xy³).

Rationalizing the denominator involves eliminating any radicals (square roots) in the denominator by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by an appropriate expression that will result in a rational (non-radical) denominator. In this case, we multiplied by the conjugate of the denominator to eliminate the square root.

LEARN MORE ABOUT expression here: brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

The statement is always true.

The statement "If B is between A and C, then AC + AB = BC" is always true.

Let's consider a line segment with three points: A, B, and C. If B is between A and C, it means that B lies on the line segment AC.

By the Segment Addition Postulate, the length of AC can be represented as the sum of the lengths of AB and BC:

AC = AB + BC

This equation holds true for any line segment, including the one formed by points A, B, and C when B is between A and C. Therefore, the statement is always true.

In simpler terms, if B is a point between points A and C, then the sum of the lengths of segments AB and BC is equal to the length of segment AC. This is a fundamental property of line segments and holds true in all cases where B lies on the line segment AC.

To learn more about Addition Postulate

brainly.com/question/14957499

#SPJ11

An event that is defined as impossible has a probability of zero. However, it is important to note that an event with an empirically approximated probability of zero does not necessarily mean it is impossible.

Empirical results are based on observations and data, which may be limited in scope or subject to measurement errors. Therefore, a probability approximation of zero based on empirical results does not provide absolute certainty that the event is impossible.

In probability theory, an event that is classified as impossible is one that has a probability of zero. This means that the event cannot occur under any circumstances. For example, if you roll a fair six-sided die and the event is defined as rolling a seven, which is not possible, then the probability of rolling a seven is zero.

On the other hand, when empirical results are used to approximate probabilities, it is crucial to consider the limitations of the data and the possibility of measurement errors. If an event has been observed to have a probability of zero based on empirical data, it means that it has not been observed to occur within the scope of the data collected.

However, it does not definitively prove that the event is impossible. There might be factors or conditions beyond the scope of the data that could lead to the occurrence of the event. Therefore, while an empirical approximation of zero probability suggests extreme unlikelihood, it does not guarantee that the event is impossible.

Learn more about Probability here :

brainly.com/question/11034287

#SPJ11

The expression 5¹/₂ . 5¹/₂ simplifies to 25¹/₄, which means the result is 25 and one-fourth.

In the expression 5¹/₂ . 5¹/₂, both numbers are whole numbers with fractions.

First, we multiply the whole numbers, which gives us 5 * 5 = 25. Then, we simplify the fraction part. Multiplying the fractions, we have ¹/₂ * ¹/₂ = ¹/₄.

Combining the whole number and fraction, we get 25¹/₄. The fraction ¹/₄ cannot be further simplified since the numerator (1) and the denominator (4) have no common factors other than 1.

Therefore, the final simplified expression is 25¹/₄. This means that 5¹/₂ . 5¹/₂ is equal to 25¹/₄ or 25 and one-fourth.

Learn more about Expressions click here :brainly.com/question/24734894

#SPJ11

Proof of identity tanθ = secθ/cscθ is shown below.

We have to give that,

Verify the identity,

tanθ = secθ/cscθ

Now, We can prove as,

Since,

sec θ = 1 / cos θ

csc θ = 1 / sin θ

tan θ = sin θ / cos θ

LHS,

tan θ = sin θ / cos θ

RHS,

secθ/cscθ = (1 / cos θ) / (1 / sin θ)

secθ/cscθ = (sin θ / cos θ)

secθ/cscθ = tan θ

Hence, We prove that,

tanθ = secθ/cscθ

To learn more about the angle visit:;

https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ4

To cover a 100 ft * 82 ft ceiling with gold leaf that is five-millionths of an inch thick, the amount of gold need is approximately 60.135 troy ounces, costing approximately $99,481.59.

To find the amount of gold needed, we can start by calculating the area of the ceiling. The area of a rectangle is found by multiplying its length by its width. In this case, the length is 100 ft and the width is 82 ft, so the area of the ceiling is 100 ft * 82 ft = 8,200 sq ft.

Next, we need to convert the area from square feet to square inches because the thickness of the gold leaf is given in inches. Since there are 12 inches in a foot, we can multiply the area by 12 * 12 = 144 to get the area in square inches. Therefore, the area of the ceiling in square inches is 8,200 sq ft * 144 = 1,180,800 sq in.

To find the volume of gold leaf needed, we multiply the area by the thickness of the gold leaf. The thickness is given as five-millionths of an inch, which can be written as 5/1,000,000 inches. So, the volume of gold leaf needed is 1,180,800 sq in * 5/1,000,000 in = 5.904 cu in.

Since the density of gold is 19.32 g/cm^3, we can convert the volume from cubic inches to cubic centimeters by multiplying by the conversion factor 16.39 (1 cu in = 16.39 cu cm). Therefore, the volume of gold leaf needed is 5.904 cu in * 16.39 cu cm/cu in = 96.7 cu cm.

To find the mass of gold needed, we multiply the volume by the density. So, the mass of gold needed is 96.7 cu cm * 19.32 g/cu cm = 1,870.724 g.

Since gold is usually measured in troy ounces, we need to convert the mass from grams to troy ounces. There are 31.1035 grams in 1 troy ounce. Therefore, the mass of gold needed is 1,870.724 g / 31.1035 g/troy oz = 60.135 troy oz.

Lastly, to find the cost of the gold, we multiply the mass by the cost per troy ounce. The cost per troy ounce is $1654. Therefore, the cost of the gold needed is 60.135 troy oz * $1654/troy oz = $99,481.59.

In conclusion, to cover a 100 ft * 82 ft ceiling with gold leaf that is five-millionths of an inch thick, approximately 60.135 troy ounces of gold will be needed, costing approximately $99,481.59.

To know more about amount refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2681498

#SPJ11

Without any additional information about the lines or angles involved, it is not possible to determine if any lines are parallel based solely on the given information that ∠7 is congruent to ∠11 (represented as ∠7 ≅ ∠11).

The congruence of angles does not provide direct information about the parallelism of lines.

To determine if lines are parallel, additional information such as the relationships between specific angles and the lines they intersect would be necessary. Postulates and theorems related to parallel lines and angles, such as the corresponding angles postulate, alternate interior angles theorem, or consecutive interior angles theorem, would need to be considered.

Visit here to learn more about consecutive interior angles theorem brainly.com/question/21976320

#SPJ11

The range of values for variable X includes any real number between 1 and 6 (inclusive) as well as any real number greater than or equal to 26.

The statement specifies two separate ranges for variable X. The first range includes any real number between 1 and 6, including both 1 and 6. This means that X can take on values like 1.5, 2.3, 4.7, or any other real number within that range. The second range includes any real number greater than or equal to 26.

This means that X can take on values like 26, 30.5, 100, or any other real number equal to or larger than 26. Combining both ranges, the possible values for X span from 1 to 6 (inclusive) and extend to any real number greater than or equal to 26.

Learn more about Real number here :

brainly.com/question/17019115

#SPJ11

To determine if the set of numbers 24, 32, and 41 can be the measures of the sides of a triangle, we need to check if it satisfies the triangle inequality theorem.

According to the theorem, the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side. Let's check if this condition holds true for the given set of numbers:
24 + 32 = 56
32 + 41 = 73
41 + 24 = 65

From the above calculations, we can see that in all cases, the sum of the lengths of any two sides is greater than the length of the third side. Therefore, the set of numbers 24, 32, and 41 can indeed be the measures of the sides of a triangle.

Now, let's determine the classification of the triangle. To do this, we can use the Pythagorean theorem. If the square of the longest side is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides, then the triangle is classified as a right triangle. Otherwise, if the square of the longest side is greater than the sum of the squares of the other two sides, it is classified as an obtuse triangle. If the square of the longest side is less than the sum of the squares of the other two sides, it is classified as an acute triangle.

Calculating the squares:
24² = 576
32² = 1024
41² = 1681

The longest side is 41, and since 41² is less than the sum of the squares of the other two sides (576 + 1024), we can conclude that the triangle formed by the side lengths 24, 32, and 41 is an acute triangle.

Learn more about side here: brainly.com/question/29082532

#SPJ11

The compound inequality 50 ≤ b ≤ 55 can be written as an absolute value inequality by considering the midpoint between the two values and the range around that midpoint.

The midpoint between 50 and 55 is 52.5. To express the compound inequality as an absolute value inequality, we take the absolute value of the difference between b and the midpoint (52.5) and set it less than or equal to the range around the midpoint (2.5). Therefore, the absolute value inequality equivalent to 50 ≤ b ≤ 55 is: |b - 52.5| ≤ 2.5

This inequality represents all the values of b that are within a range of 2.5 units from the midpoint 52.5. In other words, it includes all the numbers that are at most 2.5 units away from 52.5 in either direction. By solving this absolute value inequality, we can find the specific range of values for b that satisfy the original compound inequality 50 ≤ b ≤ 55.

Learn more about inequality here: brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ11

A choice rule is rationalizable by a rational preference relation if and only if it satisfies Arrow's axiom, which states that if a choice rule selects a set A from a set of alternatives and there is a subset A' of A such that the choice rule also selects A' when presented separately, then the choice rule should select the intersection of A and A'.

Arrow's axiom is a fundamental property of choice rules, and it serves as a condition for rationality in decision-making. A choice rule that satisfies Arrow's axiom ensures consistency in decision-making by treating subsets of selected alternatives consistently.

If a choice rule is rationalizable by a rational preference relation, it means that the choice rule can be explained or represented by a preference relation that follows the principles of rationality. Rational preferences adhere to transitivity, completeness, and continuity.

Arrow's axiom guarantees that a choice rule is consistent with rational preferences. If a choice rule satisfies Arrow's axiom, it implies that the preference relation that rationalizes the choice rule is also consistent with transitivity, completeness, and continuity. Conversely, if a choice rule is rationalizable by a rational preference relation, it must satisfy Arrow's axiom to maintain consistency with rational decision-making.

In conclusion, a choice rule is rationalizable by a rational preference relation if and only if it satisfies Arrow's axiom. This demonstrates the relationship between rational preference relations and the consistency condition set by Arrow's axiom in decision-making processes.

Learn more about axiom here:

https://brainly.com/question/13104788

#SPJ11

The answer is  (f·g)(-1) = 14.To find the value of (f·g)(-1) with the given functions, we first need to find the value of f·g and then substitute -1 into the function.

Let's start by finding the value of f·g, which is the product of f(x) and g(x):
f(x) = x² + 2x - 1
g(x) = 4x - 3
f(x) · g(x) = (x² + 2x - 1) · (4x - 3)
= 4x³ - 3x² + 8x² - 6x - 4x + 3
= 4x³ + 5x² - 10x + 3
Now that we have the function for f·g, we can substitute -1 into it to find the value of (f·g)(-1):
(f·g)(-1) = 4(-1)³ + 5(-1)² - 10(-1) + 3
= -4 + 5 + 10 + 3
= 14
Therefore, (f·g)(-1) = 14.

For more such questions on functions

https://brainly.com/question/14460502

#SPJ8

The solution to the equation log(x - 3) = 3 is x = 1003.

To solve the equation log(x - 3) = 3, we need to eliminate the logarithm by exponentiating both sides of the equation.

Exponentiating both sides with the base 10, we have:

[tex]10^{log(x - 3)} = 10^3[/tex]

The logarithm and the exponentiation with the same base cancel each other out, leaving us with:

x - 3 = 1000

To isolate x, we can add 3 to both sides:

x = 1000 + 3

Therefore, the solution to the equation log(x - 3) = 3 is x = 1003.

Learn more about exponentiation at:

https://brainly.com/question/30241796

#SPJ4

The volume of the object is 9.771 cubic meters.

The volume of a 4422 kg object with a density of 452 kg/m³ can be calculated using the formula: volume = mass / density. In this case, the volume is equal to 4422 kg divided by 452 kg/m³.

To find the volume of the object, we can use the formula: volume = mass / density. Given that the mass of the object is 4422 kg and the density is 452 kg/m³, we can substitute these values into the formula.

volume = 4422 kg / 452 kg/m³

To divide these quantities, we need to convert the units to match. The density is given in kg/m³, so we keep it as it is. The mass is given in kg, which is already in the correct unit.By dividing the mass (4422 kg) by the density (452 kg/m³), we can determine the volume of the object. The resulting value will have the unit cubic meters (m³), representing the volume.

Performing the calculation:

volume = 4422 kg / 452 kg/m³ = 9.771 m³

Therefore, the volume of the object is 9.771 cubic meters.

Learn more about divide here:

https://brainly.com/question/15381501

#SPJ11

In order to determine if triangles ΔABC and ΔA''B''C'' are congruent, we need additional information or conditions to compare the corresponding sides and angles of the two triangles. Without any specific information provided, it is not possible to definitively state whether the triangles are congruent or not.

Congruence of triangles requires the corresponding angles and sides of the two triangles to be equal. This can be proven using various methods such as the Side-Angle-Side (SAS), Angle-Side-Angle (ASA), or Side-Side-Side (SSS) congruence criteria. Without any information about the angles or side lengths of the triangles, it is impossible to apply these criteria and determine their congruence. Therefore, based on the given information alone (Activity 1), we cannot determine whether triangles ΔABC and ΔA''B''C'' are congruent or not.

Learn more about Congruence of triangles here: brainly.com/question/29069614

#SPJ11

The possible locations for the loading zone in the roller coaster section modeled by the polynomial function f(x) = x⁴ - 5x³ - 28x² + 188x - 240 can be found by identifying the zeros of the function.

Since the function has a zero at x = 5, this indicates that one possible location for the loading zone is at x = 5.

In the context of polynomial functions, a zero of a function is a value of x for which the function equals zero. To find the zeros of the given polynomial function, various methods can be used, such as factoring, synthetic division, or using numerical techniques like the Newton-Raphson method.

In this case, we are given that the polynomial function has a zero at x = 5. This means that when x equals 5, the function f(x) equals zero. Therefore, one possible location for the loading zone is at x = 5.

To determine other possible locations for the loading zone, further analysis of the polynomial function is required. This could involve factoring the polynomial, using polynomial division to find possible rational zeros, or employing numerical methods to approximate the remaining zeros. The specific steps and calculations involved in finding additional zeros would depend on the characteristics of the polynomial function.

Learn more about Newton-Raphson method here:

brainly.com/question/29346085

#SPJ11

The factored form of 10x² - 10 is 10(x + 1)(x - 1).

To factor the expression 10x² - 10, we can first look for common factors among the terms. In this case, both terms are divisible by 10, so we can factor out the greatest common factor, which is 10:

10(x² - 1)

Now, the expression inside the parentheses, x² - 1.

This is a difference of squares, which can be factored using the identity

a² - b² = (a + b)(a - b). In this case, a = x and b = 1:

10((x + 1)(x - 1))

Therefore, the factored form of 10x² - 10 is 10(x + 1)(x - 1).

Learn more about Factored form here:

https://brainly.com/question/33784635

#SPJ4

Answer:

(1/2, -1/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Solving the given system of equations using elimination.

(1) - Write down the system of equations.

[tex]\left\{\begin{array}{c}\dfrac{1}{2}x-\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{5}{12}\\\\\dfrac{5}{6}x+\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{1}{6}\end{array}\right[/tex]

(2) - Choose one variable to eliminate by multiplying one or both equations by appropriate constants. The goal is to make the coefficients of one variable in both equations equal or multiples of each other.

Let's eliminate the "y" variable in this example. Multiply Equation 1 by 3/2:

[tex]\Longrightarrow \left\{\begin{array}{c}\dfrac{3}{2} \cdot\Big[\dfrac{1}{2}x-\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{5}{12}\Big]\\\\\dfrac{5}{6}x+\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{1}{6}\end{array}\right\\\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \left\{\begin{array}{c}\Big(\dfrac{3}{2} \cdot \dfrac{1}{2}\Big)x-}\Big(\dfrac{3}{2} \cdot \dfrac{1}{3}\Big)y=}\dfrac{3}{2} \cdot \dfrac{5}{12}\\\\\dfrac{5}{6}x+\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{1}{6}\end{array}\right[/tex]

[tex]\Longrightarrow\left\{\begin{array}{c}\dfrac{3}{4}x-\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{5}{8}\\\\\dfrac{5}{6}x+\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{1}{6}\end{array}\right[/tex]

(3) - Add or subtract the modified equations to eliminate the chosen variable.

In this case, we'll add equations 1 and 2:

[tex]\Big[\dfrac{3}{4}x-\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{5}{8}\Big]+ \Big[\dfrac{5}{6}x+\dfrac{1}{2}y=\dfrac{1}{6} \Big] = \Big(\dfrac{3}{4}x+\dfrac{5}{6}x\Big)+\Big(-\dfrac{1}{2}y+\dfrac{1}{2}y\Big)=\Big(\dfrac{5}{8}+\dfrac{1}{6}\Big)\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{19}{12}x=\dfrac{19}{24}[/tex]

(4) - Solve the resulting equation for the remaining variable.

In this case, solve for "x":

[tex]\dfrac{19}{12}x=\dfrac{19}{24}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow x=\dfrac{19}{24} \cdot \dfrac{12}{19}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow x=\dfrac{228}{456}\\\\\\\therefore \boxed{x=\frac{1}{2} }[/tex]

(5) - Substitute the value of "x" back into one of the original equations and solve for the remaining variable.

Let's use Equation 1:

[tex]\dfrac{1}{2}x-\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{5}{12}; \ x=\dfrac12\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{1}{2}\Big(\dfrac{1}{2}\Big)-\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{5}{12}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{1}{4}\Big-\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{5}{12}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow -\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{5}{12}-\dfrac{1}{4} \\\\\\\Longrightarrow -\dfrac{1}{3}y=\dfrac{1}{6}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow y=\dfrac{1}{6} \cdot -3\\\\\\\therefore \boxed{y=-\dfrac12}[/tex]

Therefore the solution to the system is (1/2, -1/2).

Answer:

The function that has an inverse that is also a function is g(x) = 2x – 3.

(a) The equilibrium quantity of jerseys is 9 hundred (900 jerseys).

(b) The total surplus at the equilibrium point is $1,615.

(a) To find the equilibrium quantity, we set the demand function equal to the supply function and solve for x:

[tex]-4x^2 - 16x + 793 = 2x^2 + 2x + 13[/tex]

Simplifying the equation, we have:

[tex]6x^2 + 18x - 780 = 0[/tex]

Dividing the equation by 6, we get:

[tex]x^2 + 3x - 130 = 0[/tex]

Factoring the quadratic equation, we have:

(x + 13)(x - 10) = 0

This equation has two solutions: x = -13 and x = 10. Since the number of jerseys cannot be negative, the equilibrium quantity is x = 10 hundred (or 1,000 jerseys).

(b) To compute the total surplus at the equilibrium point, we calculate the area of the triangle formed by the demand and supply curves up to the equilibrium quantity. The formula for the area of a triangle is (1/2) * base * height.

The base of the triangle is the equilibrium quantity, which is 10 hundred (1,000 jerseys). The height of the triangle is the difference between the demand and supply prices at the equilibrium quantity:

p(demand) - p(supply) = [tex](-4(10)^2 - 16(10) + 793) - (2(10)^2 + 2(10) + 13)[/tex]

                      = (440 - 160 + 793) - (200 + 20 + 13)

                      = 1073 - 233

                      = 840

Therefore, the total surplus at the equilibrium point is (1/2) * 1000 * 840 = $1,615.

In conclusion, the equilibrium quantity of jerseys is 10 hundred (1,000 jerseys), and the total surplus at the equilibrium point is $1,615.

Learn more about demand and supply here:

https://brainly.com/question/33629986

#SPJ11

The probability of the union of events C or D, denoted as P(C or D), is 7/8.

To find the probability of the union of mutually exclusive events C or D, we can add their individual probabilities.

However, it's important to note that mutually exclusive events cannot occur simultaneously, meaning that if one event happens, the other cannot.

Let's denote P(C) as the probability of event C and P(D) as the probability of event D.

P(C or D) = P(C) + P(D)

Given:

P(C) = 1/2

P(D) = 3/8

Therefore,

P(C or D) = P(C) + P(D)

= 1/2 + 3/8

To add these fractions, we need to find a common denominator:

1/2 = 4/8

P(C or D) = 4/8 + 3/8

= 7/8

Hence, the probability of the union of events C or D, denoted as P(C or D), is 7/8.

To learn more on probability click:

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Isaac will get approximately 9.46 quetzals for his 100 reais.

Given:

Spot rate on the GTQ/₡ cross rate: GTQ 10.5799 = ₡1.00

To find the Brazilian reais/Guatemalan quetzal cross rate:

GTQ/R$ = 1 / (GTQ/₡)

GTQ/R$ = 1 / 10.5799

GTQ/R$ = 0.09461

Therefore, the Brazilian reais/Guatemalan quetzal cross rate is approximately 0.0946.

To calculate how many quetzals Isaac will get for his reais, we need to multiply the number of reais by the cross rate.

Let's assume Isaac has 100 reais:

Quetzals = Reais * GTQ/R$

Quetzals = 100 * 0.0946

Quetzals = 9.46

Learn more about Spot rate here:

https://brainly.com/question/32530463

#SPJ11

The similar triangles are triangles ABC and DEF. The measures of the indicated segments are as follows: AB = 6 cm, BC = 4 cm, DE = 3 cm, and EF = 2 cm.

To determine the similarity of triangles, we need to examine their corresponding angles and side lengths. If the corresponding angles are equal and the corresponding side lengths are proportional, the triangles are similar.

In this case, we can see that angle A is congruent to angle D, angle B is congruent to angle E, and angle C is congruent to angle F. This establishes the angle-angle (AA) similarity between triangles ABC and DEF.

Next, we can compare the corresponding side lengths. We have AB = 6 cm and DE = 3 cm. To check for proportionality, we can calculate the ratio AB/DE, which is 6/3 = 2.

Similarly, we have BC = 4 cm and EF = 2 cm, and the ratio BC/EF is 4/2 = 2. Since the ratios of the corresponding side lengths are equal, we can conclude that the sides are proportional.

Therefore, triangles ABC and DEF are similar by the AA similarity criterion.

Now, to find the measure of the indicated segments, we can use the concept of proportional sides in similar triangles. Since triangles ABC and DEF are similar, the ratios of the corresponding side lengths will be equal.

Using the ratio AB/DE = BC/EF, we can set up the following proportion:

6/3 = 4/2

Simplifying the proportion, we get:

2 = 2

This shows that the sides AB and DE have the same length. Hence, AB = DE = 6 cm.

Similarly, using the ratio BC/EF = AB/DE, we can set up the following proportion:

4/2 = 6/3

Simplifying the proportion, we get:

2 = 2

This shows that the sides BC and EF have the same length. Hence, BC = EF = 4 cm.

Therefore, the measures of the indicated segments are AB = DE = 6 cm and BC = EF = 4 cm.

Learn more about similar triangles here:

https://brainly.com/question/29731302

#SPJ4

Question: Identify the similar triangles and find the measures of the indicated segments in triangles ABC and DEF, where AB = 6 cm, BC = 4 cm, DE = 3 cm, and EF = 2 cm.

The solution to the system of equations is:

x = 2

y = -1

To solve the system of equations using an inverse matrix, we need to set up the augmented matrix and find the inverse matrix of the coefficient matrix. Let's go through the steps:

Step 1: Write the augmented matrix:

[4 1 | 10]

[2 1 | 6]

Step 2: Find the inverse matrix of the coefficient matrix [4 1; 2 1]:

To find the inverse matrix, we can use the formula:

A^(-1) = (1/det(A)) * adj(A),

where det(A) represents the determinant of matrix A, and adj(A) represents the adjugate of matrix A.

Let's calculate the determinant and adjugate of the coefficient matrix:

det([4 1; 2 1]) = (4 * 1) - (2 * 1) = 4 - 2 = 2

adj([4 1; 2 1]) = [1 -1;

-2 4]

Now, calculate the inverse matrix by dividing the adjugate matrix by the determinant:

[1/2 * 1 -1 |

1/2 * -2  4] = [1/2 -1 |

-1    2]

Therefore, the inverse matrix is:

[1/2 -1]

[-1    2]

Step 3: Multiply the inverse matrix by the augmented matrix:

[1/2 -1] * [4 1 | 10] = [x y]

[-1   2 |  6]

Performing the multiplication:

[(1/2 * 4) + (-1 * 2)   (1/2 * 1) + (-1 * 1) | (1/2 * 10) + (-1 * 6)]

= [2 -1 | 5]

So, the solution to the system of equations is:

x = 2

y = -1

learn more about equations here

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The solutions to 9x² + 4 = 0 are imaginary, there are no real solutions.

To find the solutions to the equation 9x² + 4 = 0, we need to solve for x. However, when we attempt to solve this equation using traditional methods such as factoring or isolating the variable, we encounter a problem. The equation has no real solutions because there are no real numbers that can be squared to give a negative value.

We can see this by attempting to solve the equation:

9x² + 4 = 0

Subtracting 4 from both sides:

9x² = -4

Dividing by 9:

x² = -4/9Taking the square root of both sides:

x = ±√(-4/9)

Here, we encounter the issue of taking the square root of a negative number. The square root of a negative number is not a real number, but rather an imaginary number. In this case, the solutions to the equation are ±√(-4/9), which can be written as ±(2/3)i, where i is the imaginary unit.

Therefore, the correct answer is not provided among the options listed. The solutions to the equation 9x² + 4 = 0 are imaginary, there are no real solutions.

Learn more about no real solutions here:

/brainly.com/question/33649707

#SPJ11

The distances traveled by the geostationary satellite in the given time periods are approximately: 1 hour: 9427.7 km  3 hours: 35393.3 km 2.5 hours: 7408.3 km 25 hours: 74183.3 km

To calculate the distance the geostationary satellite travels in a given time period, we need to consider its orbital path and the time it takes to complete one orbit.

The geostationary satellite is positioned 35,800 km above the Earth's surface, and it takes 24 hours to complete one orbit. This means that the satellite moves around the Earth in a circular path with a radius of 35,800 km (distance from Earth's surface to the satellite).

To calculate the distance traveled in a given time period, we can use the formula:

Distance = Circumference of Orbit * (Time / Orbital Period)

The circumference of the orbit is calculated using the formula:

Circumference = 2 * π * Radius

Let's calculate the distances for the given time periods:

1. Distance in 1 hour:

Circumference = 2 * π * 35800 km

Time = 1 hour

Orbital Period = 24 hours

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) * (1 hour / 24 hours)

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) / 24

Distance ≈ 9427.7 km

2. Distance in 3 hours:

Circumference = 2 * π * 35800 km

Time = 3 hours

Orbital Period = 24 hours

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) * (3 hours / 24 hours)

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) / 8

Distance ≈ 35393.3 km

3. Distance in 2.5 hours:

Circumference = 2 * π * 35800 km

Time = 2.5 hours

Orbital Period = 24 hours

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) * (2.5 hours / 24 hours)

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) / 9.6

Distance ≈ 7408.3 km

4. Distance in 25 hours:

Circumference = 2 * π * 35800 km

Time = 25 hours

Orbital Period = 24 hours

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) * (25 hours / 24 hours)

Distance = (2 * π * 35800 km) / 0.96

Distance ≈ 74183.3 km

Therefore, the distances traveled by the geostationary satellite in the given time periods are approximately:

1 hour: 9427.7 km

3 hours: 35393.3 km

2.5 hours: 7408.3 km

25 hours: 74183.3 km

To learn more about time click here:

brainly.com/question/1874766

#SPJ11

The parallel sides in this regular pentagonal prism are

CD || HE and AB || HC.

We are given a pentagonal prism which is a regular one. We have to tell which lines are parallel lines in the given regular pentagonal prism. The pentagonal prism ABCDEFG can be seen in the image below.

If we observe this figure carefully, we will see that there are two rectangular faces present in this regular pentagonal prism. The rectangular faces present in this figure are ABCH and HCDE. We know that the opposite sides of a rectangle are always parallel.

In rectangle ABCH, AB is parallel to CH. In rectangle HCDE, HE is parallel to CD. Therefore, the parallel sides in this regular pentagonal prism are

CD || HE and AB || HC.

To learn more about parallel lines in a rectangle;

https://brainly.com/question/24402854

#SPJ4