Answer:
The purpose is the requirement that a person otherwise eligible to vote register (or enroll) on an electoral roll before they will be entitled or permitted to vote.
Explanation:
I waited for my dad to come back from the store to get milk its been 18 years what happened to him
Answer:
I am sorry that this has happened however he is not going to come back. Most likely cause he dislikes you. :)
Explanation:
Provide 1 example for each of the following (6 Points)
Legislative to Executive
Executive to Legislative
Legislative to Judicial
Judicial to Legislative
Executive to Judicial
Judicial to Executive
As reproductive technology advanced, headlines announcing "Couple Battles over Frozen Embryos" became more and more commonplace. For example, in the 1980s a man went to court and succeeded in preventing his ex-wife from using their frozen embryos to become pregnant. He maintained that after he and his wife had divorced, he no longer wanted to become a parent, and should not be forced to do so against his will. In 1998, a divorced woman in New Jersey won a legal battle with her ex-husband over custody of seven frozen embryos the couple had created in vitro while still married. The wife wanted to have the embryos destroyed, while the ex-husband argued his right to adopt his own embryos to be implanted in a future partner or donated to an infertile couple.
Required:
a. In your opinion, should frozen embryos be considered property to be awarded during a divorce? Why or why not?
b. Should a man who loses custody of frozen embryos in a lawsuit be responsible for child support if his ex-wife is implanted with the embryos and becomes pregnant at a later date? Explain your answer.
c. Should the husband or wife who wins custody of frozen embryos be allowed to destroy them, against the wishes of the ex-husband or ex-wife? Why or why not?
Answer: Frozen embryo are those which are not used for the invitro fertilization and implantation procedures and then stored by the cryopreservation procedures for future use.
Explanation:
a. The frozen embryo is the advanced medical technology which can give birth to a new life. During the break up of relationships, it is advised not to be given to any one of the parents as it is the output of both parents not from a single one. Awarding to a single parent will be partiality for other one.
b. No the man will not be considered responsible for the child. It will grow by the mother after divorce the father can pay for the expenditures done on the child.
c. After obtaining the custody of the frozen embryo the parent can destroy the egg legally against the will of the ex-partner who is no longer responsible for the frozen embryo.
A rule of law enabling a defendant to win even if all of plaintiff's allegations are true is a(n) _____. Select one: a. counterclaim b. affirmative defense c. deposition d. judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Answer:
d .
Explanation:
d.judgment not withstanding the verdict
Imagine that you are a Security Administrator. Explain how you would respond to the following situations, and why? During an audit you discover an internal control weakness that could allow for the embezzlement of fund from the company. You notice your co-worker has recently started arriving to work in a new car and wearing more expensive clothes and jewelry. You are the assistant controller and you notice a control weakness that would allow you to embezzle funds from the company.
Answer:
The best thing to do is to get evidence that your co-worker embezzles funds from the company, If suspicions are true then report to the CEO of the company as this will prove your loyalty to the company therefore benefiting me a promotion.
When one or both parties to an illegal bargain are ignorant of the facts that made the bargain illegal, the court is most likely to: Select one: a. never allow either party to recover damages for breach of the agreement. b. allow recovery for performance rendered before the parties learned of the illegality. c. declare the bargain unconscionable. d. regard the contract a serious threat to public welfare and declare it void.
Answer:
Allow recovery for performance rendered before the parties learned of the illegality
Explanation: Allow recovery for performance rendered before the parties learned of the illegality
Your food preparation area surface needs to contain smooth, nonabsorbent food contact surfaces
Explanation:
if not possible, customer should not pass through food prep area to get to the restroom should be convenient, sanitary ... -be placed on smooth, durable, nonabsorbent surface (asphalt and concrete) -have tight fitting
All surfaces that come into contact with food during production, processing or packaging are considered food contact surfaces. Stainless steel are commonly used, however other materials such as wood, rubber or glass can also be used.
The correct thing is that surfaces that come into contact with food are smooth, non-absorbent and easy to clean.
A smooth, non-absorbent and easy-to-clean surface prevents:-
The proliferation of bacteria. The accumulation of organic particles. The accumulation of dirt. The possibility of causing food infection.To know more about food contact surfaces, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/4491389
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.VSuppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
The above scenario is an example of what?
Answer:
Negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, the operators' neglect to adjust the scale properly to ensure the proper functioning and accuracy of weighing resulted in the exposure of incorrect information that hindered the transportation and sale of a certain product. This is a case of Negligent misrepresentation, since there was a display of a false statement due to imprudence, a negligence.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DCMA) provides for which of the following: Select one:
a. Civil liability for transmitting copyrighted materials online.
b. Criminal penalties for circumvention of copyright protection systems
c. Has as its primary focus the criminalization of technologies that secure digital copies of music, videos, and literary works.
d. All of the above.
According to the reading, what were the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche? Check all that apply. to promote the Christian religion to celebrate the holiday to encourage the celebration of Christmas to show how the holiday started to act as a place for prayer
Answer:
to celebrate the holiday
to show how the holiday started
Explanation:
This is the reading
The narrow question is whether there is a secular purpose for Pawtucket's display of the crèche. The display is sponsored by the city to celebrate the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday. These are legitimate secular purposes.
—Chief Justice Warren Burger,
Opinion of the Court,
Lynch v. Donnelly
1984
From this reading it can be inferred that the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche was to show how the holiday started and also to to celebrate the holiday.
Answer:
To celebrate the holiday
To show how the holiday started
Explanation:
What is WAEC Expo 2020
Answer:
The West African Examinations Council (WAEC)
Explanation:
The West African Examinations Council (WAEC) says it is set to introduce a device that will henceforth check collusion during its examinations across the country.
The council’s Head, Media and Information, Mr classic said this in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Wednesday in Lagos.
He said that during the 2020/2021 examination, it was discovered that collusion was gradually replacing other previous forms of malpractices recorded by the council including impersonation.
“We are planning to introduce software called Item Differential Programme. This device is one that would assist in detecting collusion in any given examination.
“The introduction of the device is based on the high level of collusion that we discovered during the 2014/2015 examination.
“The device will be able to detect if candidates have jointly answered a particular multiple choice question, which we refer to as “item”.
“For instance, if out of 100 candidates, 80 per cent of them go for a particular item which might be wrong as their answer, the device will immediately flag such item and aggregate the candidates,” he explained.
Ojijeogu noted that the device, if approved by council, might be introduced at its 2020 November/December diet of the West Africa Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) for private candidates
An engineer designs a building that is constructed according to plans and specifications. The building owner hires a window washer to wash the windows. When the window washer falls from the building, he sues the design engineer. Discuss this suit under the Winterbottom v. Wright precedent. How would modern day courts decide such a case
Answer:
Ask how did he fall. where from. and why he believes it was the designer's fault.
Explanation:
Hope that helped
An officer has made application for a court order approving electronic surveillance of Defendant. The order is granted, stating: "From June 1 to June 7, Officer X, having established probable cause, is granted the authority to intercept the wire communications of Defendant." The officer proceeded to enter Defendant’s house, without a warrant, to install the listening device. Eventually, a recording is made of Defendant discussing his illegal activities with a friend. Defendant is arrested, charged, and has filed a motion to suppress the interception. Defendant asserts that the entry into his house was illegal. Discuss.
Answer:
he wasn't granted permission to enter the home
Explanation:
he was granted right to monitor not break in to his home
When merging, yield to traffic __.
A. already on the road you’re joining
B. on your right side only
C. if its going slower than you
D. if its going the same speed as you
When merging, yield to traffic already on the road you’re joining. Thus the correct option is A.
What is traffic?Traffic is referred to as the movement of vehicles on roads or highways. When this movement of vehicles is restricted it gives rise to jams making all the vehicles in slow motion and unable to make it to the destination.
In comparison to large-size vehicles, two-wheeled vehicles are smaller in size and can travel through traffic more effortlessly. Taking shortcuts on the road through narrow roads—which are impractical for four-wheelers like cars—also enables people to arrive on time.
When merging the vehicle in the lane one is required to evaluate the speed of running vehicles in order to avoid any accident or collision with them. one should see the movement of vehicles when changing lanes and maintain a slower speed.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Merging the vehicle, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4637613
#SPJ2
Function of law in society
Answer
To control disruptive behaviour.
Explanation:
Although there are several functions of law in society, yet it is to control the disruptive behaviour of individuals. In a society where there is no law, such will be characterised with disorderliness. Law helps to resolve dispute, protects right and freedom, establish rules of conduct, provides a system of enforcement and protect the society at large.
Laws are created in a society to instill discipline on it's citizens and to set out clearly what is right from what is wrong. It also maintains social order, economic and political stability in a society. It maintains social order in the scenes that there is a limit to how individuals must act in relation to one another in any given society.
Other functions of law are that it governs how people behave and then set out how government would deal with such behaviour. Individuals also have power or rights under law hence create a limit to government power which in turn promote peace in a society.
According to Hirschi and Hindelang, there is a clear link between criminality and:
Answer:
Low intelligence.
Answer:
low IQ
Explanation:
Also known as low intelligence
In the lawsuit referred to where a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine, is suing the Federal Government and the DEA, what can the defendants use to win this case
Answer:
The options are;
A. Commerce clause
B. The Separation of powers clause
C.The First Amendment
D. The Supremacy clause
The answer is D. The Supremacy clause
Explanation:
In the lawsuit which involved a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine suing the Federal Government and the DEA, the defendants are the Federal Government and DEA and the only way they can win the case is by applying the Supremacy clause which states that Federal laws are superior to State laws.
Although some states have legalized the use of marijuana, the Federal Government still considers the use of marijuana as illegal.
Sheela is severely injured by Alex in an automobile accident caused by Alex’s negligence. Sheela wishes to sue Alex for the tort of negligence to recover monetary damages for her injuries. Sheela borrows $ 5000 from TD Bank to pay her debts as she cannot work due to her injuries. Sheela defaults on the loan payment repayable with 8 per cent interest in equal monthly installments.
1. Can Sheela’s right to sue Alex be assigned?
2. Can TD Bank assign its right to recover loan amount from Sheela?
Answer: 7
Explanation: im a genius
How criminal courts influence public safety ?
You are walking down a street and pass by a beer brewery. A barrel rolls out of a third story window and injures you. You have no idea how this occurred, and you will have difficulty providing that the brewery was at fault. What legal theory will you best if you sue the brewery?
a. Res ipsa loquitur
b. Strict liability
c. Negligence per se
d. Battery
Answer:
B) strict liability ( I think )
Explanation:
Hope that helped! :)
explain commercial law
Answer:
Commercial law, also known as mercantile law or trade law, is the body of law that applies to the rights, relations, and conduct of persons and businesses engaged in commerce, merchandising, trade, and sales.[1] It is often considered to be a branch of civil law and deals with issues of both private law and public law.
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
A) To show how primitive human beings lived before they formed societies.
B)To determine the natural rights of human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
C)To show that all governments represents at least marginal improvements to the state of nature.
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
E)To show the rights to property obtains in the state of nature but not in civil society.
Answer:
b) to determine the natural rights of human beings and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
The purpose in examining the “state of Nature” is To determine the natural rights of a human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power. Thus, option (B) is correct.
What is natural rights?Natural law claims that persons have certain rights. For instance, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed as natural rights in the United States Declaration of Independence.
The right to property, the freedom to criticize the government, and the right to free, and independent thought are all examples of natural rights.
These are universal and inalienable since they are not founded on the laws, customs, or beliefs of any one community or government.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the goal of studying the "state of Nature" is to evaluate a human being's inherent rights and, as a result, the rightful degree of political authority. Hence, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about natural rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/20887193
#SPJ2
The legitimacy of the police as a social institution implemented to provide assistance to the public is weakened when officers enforce the law for reasons other than public safety.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
It is true because of the fact that basic function of policing revolves around the safety of the public and when law is enforced for other reasons than assisting public for their safety, their legitimacy is weakened and people tend to lose trust in the institution.
Answer: A. TRUE
Explanation:
The police was implemented as a social institution established by the government which represents the civil authority of government.
Police are generally responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, investigating and detecting criminal activities. Performing of this functions is what is known as policing. When police officers enforces the law for reasons other than public safety they undermine the legitimacy of the police as a social institution established for providing assistance to the general public.
Is it a violation of the Federal Wiretap Law (Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act) for Gary to allow law enforcement officers to listen to a telephone conversation between himself and Terry without Terry’s knowledge
Answer:
I think it's a crime and it shows no manners
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) During which phase of a trial is evidence given in the attempt to convince the judge that there is enough evidence to go to trial? arraignment preliminary hearing deposition discovery
Answer:
Preliminary hearing.
Explanation:
A preliminary hearing in criminal litigation is commonly referred to as a prelim and is the legal process of a "trial before the trial" of an accused or the defendant.
This simply means that, at the preliminary hearing, the judge using the "probable cause" legal standard, decides whether there is enough evidence to warrant the defendant to stand trial but not to determine whether he or she is guilty or innocent of the crime. Thus, no jury is present or required at this phase of trial because the defendant isn't entitled to any at the preliminary hearing.
Additionally, during the preliminary hearing phase of a trial, evidence is given in the attempt to convince the judge that there is enough evidence to go to trial. A prosecutor on behalf of the government may call witnesses to testify against the defendant and even present physical evidence to the judge, so that the case may go to trial while the defense counsel will work towards having the case dismissed by cross examining the government witnesses and disputing any evidence presented.
In recent years, local government entities have filed lawsuits against oil companies to hold them responsible for the public costs of climate change under the theory of public nuisance. Marin and San Mateo Counties brought a case in 2017. These cases are still pending in the courts today.
What is your opinion regarding using the courts and the legal claim of public nuisance to hold oil companies responsible for public costs of climate change?
Answer:
jsnndnejz
I need points so don't listen to me
Privileges or immunities of national citizenship are most evident outside of the country.
Answer:
please say that! now what should we do?
what is vicarious liability in tort ?
Answer:
Vicarious liability in tort involves holding a particular entity responsible for any wrong doing . The entity may not necessarily be the one who committed it.
The entity bears the consequences and brunt of such tortious actions which may vary from accidents to loss or damage of certain goods and services. The entity is the one who pays the compensations or other forms of reliefs to the victims of the tortious actions.
The Probable Cause Panel of FREC acts as a grand jury. They determine if there is a law violation or not and they recommend whether to take further action or dismiss the case to the FREC. How long does the Probable Cause Panel have to determine whether the case should go forward?
Answer:
30 days.
Explanation:
FREC means "Florida Real Estate Commission." It was created to protect the public through education and regulation of real estate licensees. The Commission consists of seven members appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation by the Senate.
The Probable Cause Panel of FREC is given 30 days from the receipt of the final investigative report to make a probable cause determination.
The Panel is usually composed of two current members or one current and one former member of the FREC, appointed by the Commission's chairperson, with one of the members being a professional member.
Compare the text of the United States' first amendment, guaranteeing Freedom of Expression, with the United Kingdom's Human Rights Act of 1998 which offers similar protection. By your reading of the two texts, which country offers broader protections, and why?
Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety prevent disorder or crime protect health or morals protect the rights and reputations of other people prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"Cheers!
The United States does not guarantee the freedom of expression. However, the United Kingdom does. It states that is properly used so nobody gets hurt. The United Kingdom offers broader protections by protecting the well-being of the state. The U.s is less strict.
