The court provided three analysis in the grimes vs young life case that the contract was primarily signed for the construction of services. The usage of words like project and construction in the contract and the contract gives an estimated rice of the project.
Olivia Grimes died at a Camp in Carolina Point which is owned by Young Life, while on a three person giant swing Olivia Grimes fell from the swing causing death. A plea or quest was filed in order to crossclaim against Young Life arguing that Young Life should indemnify it against any Judgement, under which the court pronounced that the contract was primarily signed for the construction of services. The usage of words like project and construction in the contract and the contract gives an estimated rice of the project. The plaintiff claimed negligence on the part of the defendant.
Know more about "grimes vs young life" visit
brainly.com/question/30430860
#SPJ4
which federal law prohibits intercepting any communication, regardless of how it was transmitted?
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Title 18 prohibits intercepting any communication, regardless of how it was transmitted.
United States cybersecurity legislation known as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (CFAA) was passed in 1986 as an addendum to the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984's provisions on computer fraud. Accessing a computer without authority or in excess of that authorization is against the law. Computer crimes were previously tried as mail and wire fraud, although the applicable statute was frequently insufficient until there were computer-specific criminal laws.
Concerned that crimes involving computers would go unpunished, the initial bill from 1984 was passed. The 1983 techno-thriller WarGames, in which a young Seattle teen breaks into a U.S. military supercomputer programmed to predict possible outcomes of nuclear war and unwittingly almost starts World War III, was referred to in the House Committee Report to the original computer crime bill as "a realistic representation of the automatic dialling and access capabilities of the personal computer."
To know more about statute, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7582973
#SPJ4
What happened in Lemon v Kurtzman?
In Lemon v. Kurtzman, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that laws in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island that gave Catholic school instructors a taxpayer-funded wage supplement were unconstitutional for violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Lemon v. Kurtzman decision is significant because it created the Lemon Rule, a three-part analysis to assess whether a law violates the First Amendment's ban on the establishment of religion. A significant Supreme Court ruling called Lemon v. Kurtzman forbade state governments from giving taxpayer money to schools with a religious affiliation. State financing may now be used in religiously connected schools in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island to pay teachers' salaries and purchase instructional supplies. The Establishment Clause and the separation of church and state were both broken, according to the Supreme Court's ruling.
Learn more about Lemon v Kurtzman here:
https://brainly.com/question/9031401
#SPJ4
nicaragua releases over 200 political prisoners and sends them to the us. (true or false)
It is true that following years of repression by the nation's President Daniel Ortega, the government of Nicaragua freed more than 200 political prisoners, many of whom, according to officials, landed in the United States.
Many opposition leaders and activists have been imprisoned by the autocratic regime, especially in the months before the most recent elections in November 2021.
At a news conference on Thursday, Judge Octavio Rothschuh Andino announced the release of at least 222 prisoners from the prison system of Nicaragua, adding that some were already traveling to the US.
According to US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, one of the released inmates is an American. Blinken applauded the action and referred to it as the result of American diplomacy.
Blinken reported that individuals who were detained included "political and economic leaders, journalists, civil society members, and students".
According to Price, the people, who all traveled to Dulles International Airport, will be given humanitarian parole for two years, enabling them to stay in the US and giving them the opportunity to request asylum if they so choose.
To learn more about Nicaragua, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/16839526
#SPJ4
what are the three types of authority exercised in a construction contract
The three types of authority exercised in a construction contract are apparent, expressed(written) and limited.
A construction contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties for construction of any building or monuments in exchange of certain money based on a tender. This contract mentions every detail of the construction work which gives right to the parties to exercise their rights and claim answers to that. Three types of authority are conferred by contract in a construction work apparent, expressed(written) and limited authority. where apparent authority refers to the power of an agent to act on behalf of a principal, even though not expressly or impliedly granted. Expressed authority is a form of written authority to a agent to work on behalf of principal, and limited authority where certain decisions cannot be solely made by the principal or agent it has to be discussed. These are the three types of authorities exercised in a construction contract.
Know more about "contract" visit
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
the goal of president obama’s stimulus package and increased government spending following the deep economic downturn in 2008 and 2009 was to reduce inflation. (T/F)
The given statement " the goal of president obama’s stimulus package and increased government spending following the deep economic downturn in 2008 and 2009 was to reduce inflation." is False.
The goal of President Obama's stimulus package and increased government spending following the deep economic downturn in 2008 and 2009 was not to reduce inflation. Instead, it was aimed at stimulating economic growth, creating jobs, and preventing a further economic downturn.
At the time, the United States was experiencing a severe recession, and the government implemented various measures to try to stimulate the economy and promote growth. These measures included increased government spending on infrastructure projects, tax cuts for individuals and businesses, and other measures aimed at boosting consumer spending and business investment.
Reducing inflation was not a primary goal of these policies, although the government likely hoped that increased economic growth would help to stabilize prices and prevent inflation from rising too rapidly.
To know more about inflation here
https://brainly.com/question/30112292
#SPJ4
what are situations that require extralegal or exceptional actions by the police?
Under exigent circumstances situations that require extralegal or exceptional actions by the police.
Situations that require extralegal or exceptional actions by the police are called exigent circumstances. In such circumstances the police officers are justified not to follow procedural rules framed for the effective policing and to prohibit illegal usage of the post and power they are free from certain procedural rules such as to pertain search and arrest warrants under the fourth amendment. Situations that may lead to exigent circumstances are 1) violent nature of the crimes committed 2)a reasonable belief that the suspect is armed 3)probability the the suspect has committed the crime in such situations the exigent circumstances come to existence.
Know more about "exigent circumstances" visit
brainly.com/question/28850681
#SPJ4
Which process of taking fingerprints involves the development of prints by using amino acids resulting from perspiration?O handwriting from a murder suspect
O ninhydrinO photographingO fingerprint scanning
Answer:
A. Ninhydrin
Explanation:
Ninhydrin reagent, which reacts with amino acids in the oil from fingers to produce a blue-purple stain pattern, was an early addition to fingerprint identification. Other chemical methods have followed, including fuming an object with iodine vapor, treating with silver nitrate, or forming metal complexes
When hearing a disparate treatment case, the court first tries to rule out the ______. most obvious reasons for rejecting the plaintiff's claim.
When hearing a disparate treatment case, the court first tries to rule out the "legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons". Most obvious reasons for rejecting the plaintiff's claim.
This means that the defendant (usually an employer) has the opportunity to present evidence that their actions were based on reasons other than discrimination, such as the plaintiff's performance or qualifications for a particular job.
The burden of proof then shifts back to the plaintiff to show that the defendant's proffered reasons are merely a pretext for discrimination.
Disparate treatment is a type of employment discrimination that occurs when an employer treats an employee or group of employees less favorably because of their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability status.
When an employee alleges that they have been subjected to disparate treatment, they must first establish a prima facie case.
To know more about disparate treatment here:
https://brainly.com/question/9811846
#SPJ4
The public's right to know via the media does not conflict with the victim's right to privacy. True or false?
The statement "The public's right to know via the media does not conflict with the victim's right to privacy" is false.
Whenever a person suffers a crime, its identity is safeguarded from media so as to protect their rights, but the facts of cases can't be concealed until personal or private in order spread awareness among the masses. The UN Declaration recognized the major components of the rights of victims of crime: 1. access to justice and fair treatment; 2. restitution 3. compensation in the form of money or job that can secure the future of the victims from society; 4. rehabilitation or assistance throughout the legal process and right to protection of privacy and safety.
Know more about "right to privacy" visit
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
what rule (law) did the court apply in the neumann v liles case?
There may be multiple cases with similar names, and the specific rule or law that was applied in a case can depend on the jurisdiction and the details of the case.
If you can provide me with additional information about the Neumann v Liles case, such as the jurisdiction or a brief summary of the case facts, I may be able to help you with your question.
In legal terms, innuendo refers to "an indirect hint," and it can be used to prove that the complainant/plaintiff is the person about whom defamatory allegations have been made in a blind item in defamation litigation (libel or slander).
If someone is accused of defamation, they must demonstrate that what they have written or said is accurate. So, in defamation proceedings, the burden of proof is inverted and the defendant is required to establish their case.
For such more question on jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/11744340
#SPJ4
may take from 2 months to 7 years in which trade name is finalized and nda review is completed
The review of a new drug application may take from 2 months to 7 years after the trade name is finalized, and the NDA (New Drug Application) review is completed.
Preclinical (animal) testing comes first in the evaluation of new drug applications. A new medicine's sponsor's plans for clinical trial human testing are outlined in an investigational novel drug application. The studies of Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 are conducted after it. The time frame immediately preceding the submission of an NDA or new drug application. A regular time for meetings between the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and drug sponsors. The official procedure to request that the FDA consider approving a medicine for commercialization is to submit an NDA. The FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) has 60 days from the time it receives an NDA to decide whether to file it for review. An FDA review panel is tasked with assessing the sponsor's analysis of the drug's safety and efficacy if the FDA submits the NDA (new drug application). The FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) examines the information on a drug's official labeling. As part of the approval procedure, the FDA inspects the factories where the medicine will be made. FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) reviewers will either accept the application or send a letter with a detailed response. This whole procedure may take from 2 months to 7 years.
To learn more about U.S. Food and Drug Administration, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/30302103
#SPJ4
which civil rights act banned discrimination against any person based on race or color?
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the act that outlawed prejudice based on race or color.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as improved, protects representatives and task applicants from hiring bias established by race, color, cult, sexuality, and nationwide origin. In 1964, Congress gave Public Law 88-352 (78 Stat. 241). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits bias on the footing of race, color, doctrine, sexuality, or national inception.
Provisions concerning this civil liberties act outlawed bias on the base of sex, in addition to, race in engaging, advancing, and discharging. The 1968 Act extended previous acts and forbidden bias having to do with the auction, rent, and financing of the place of accommodation established race, morality, social inception, sexuality, (and as amended) handicap, and offspring rank.
To know more about Civil Rights Act refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29768407
#SPJ4
if a restriction imposed on speech by the government is content neutral, then a court will not allow it. True or False.
False, A court may nonetheless approve a speech restriction by the government if it complies with certain requirements even if it is content-neutral, meaning it does not support or oppose certain opinions or ideas.
To be content-nonpartisan, discourse impediments should pass what is known as the "halfway examination" standard under the Primary Change of the US Constitution.
This implies that the government must demonstrate that the limitation furthers a significant governmental interest while not significantly restricting speech beyond what is required to serve that purpose.
Time, place, and manner limitations on speech, such as prohibitions on the use of loudspeakers in residential areas or guidelines requiring demonstrators to keep a particular distance from the public, are examples of material restrictions that may be permitted under intermediate scrutiny.
Learn more about governmental restrictions at
https://brainly.com/question/12355914
#SPJ4
signs that temporary and let you know when you should be prepared to stop or detour due to an unplanned event. TEMPORARY SIGNS. fluorescent pink w black lettering. (lane ends, exit closed, be prepared to stop, hazardous material spill, unplanned incident, natural disaster, road user incident.
Temporary regulatory signs warn drivers when they should expect to halt or take a diversion because of an unforeseen circumstance.
TRANSIENT SIGNAGE. neon pink with black writing. (lane closing, exit closed, be ready to halt, spill of hazardous substance, accident without warning, natural catastrophe, road user event)
Most regulatory signs, which are often in the shape of a vertical triangle, are used to regulate traffic and to encourage people to observe the regulations.
These signs are used to control traffic for things like lane usage, parking, turning, and speed, and they are also known as regulatory signs when they are used in certain circumstances.
They often have a triangular form with a red circle or dot within to indicate the signs, the direction they must go in, and the rule they must not follow.
No right turn, no left turn, and no U-turn are a few instances.
To learn more about TEMPORARY SIGNS (Regulatory signs)
https://brainly.com/question/27992785
#SPJ4
What is the meaning of individual rights?
Individual rights are moral or legal rights given to a individual.
The rights are assigned and protected by the constitution itself, to honor their liberty and freedom. These rights are protected by the judiciary and whenever a person violates such rights of another person the constitution gives the individual the right to seek help from judiciary. Individual rights are personal rights given to a person to protect his sovereignty but these don't exist in vaccum they are followed by numerous liberties as well which the person is liable perform. Individual rights enabled citizens to live freely and own property, and work according to their own interest without violating the rights of others.
Know more about "Individual rights" visit
brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ4
gene is bringing a suit in strict liability for personal injuries caused by a defectively designed hair dryer. which of the following parties can be defendants in this case? (select all the answer options that are correct) group of answer choices employee that sold it kamp;l inc., who manufactured the hair dryer big retail outlet who sold the dryer to gene electronic designs, who designed the hair dyer
The answer is option B. Electronic Designs, who designed the hair dryer and C. Kamp:L Inc., who manufactured dryer. These parties can be defendants in this case.
What are the two categories of responsibility under the law?In contrast to criminal liability, which is frequently filed by the State to address a public wrong, civil liability is typically brought by a private person to suit for damages, injunctions, or other remedies.
What constitutes the legal foundation for liability?Civil law can impose legal obligation based on legislation, contracts, or torts. A liability insurance policy often obligates the insurer to defend the insured against accusations that, if accurate, would be covered by the policy.
To know more about Liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30638370
#SPJ1
A mining company that operated a copper mine in a remote location kept dynamite in a storage facility at the mine. The storage facility was designed and operated in conformity with state-of-the-art safety standards. In the jurisdiction, the storage of dynamite is deemed an abnormally dangerous activity. Dynamite that was stored in the mining company's storage facility and that had been manufactured by an explosives manufacturer exploded due to an unknown cause. The explosion injured a state employee who was at the mine performing a safety audit. The employee brought an action in strict liability against the mining company. What would be the mining company's best defense?
A. The mine was in a remote location.
B. The mining company did not manufacture the dynamite.
C. The state employee assumed the risk of injury inherent in the job.
D. The storage facility conformed to state-of-the-art safety standards.
The correct answer is C). The state employee assumed the risk of injury inherent in the job. A mining corporation kept explosives in a storage facility while running a distant copper mine. The state employee accepted the occupational risk of injury.
Under the legal principle known as "assumption of risk," a person is prohibited from suing for damages if they involuntarily exposed himself to a known danger. In certain states, taking on risk is viewed as contributing to negligence. In strict liability proceedings, assumption of risk cannot be used as a defence.
Even though a reasonable person would have been aware of such a risk, a plaintiff cannot accept a risk that he or she is uninformed of.
Read more about storage facility at
https://brainly.com/question/30461678
#SPJ4
